11th MEETING of the INTERNATIONAL POST-COMBUSTION CO2 CAPTURE NETWORK Post Combustion Systems Coal Fired Pilot Plant and Multipollutant Control Masaki Iijima 20th -21st May, 2008 Vienna, Austria CONTENTS 1. MHI’s Commercial Achievements 2 MHI’s Long Term 10 t/d CO2 Capt 2. Capture re Demonstration Tests from a Coal Fired Boiler 3 MHI’s CO2 Recovery 3. Reco er Technolog Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration 4 Ph 4. Phased d Approach A h to t Commercialization C i li ti for f Coal Application 5 MHI’s 5. MHI’ S Scope iin a CCS Project P j t 6. Conclusions 1. MHI’s Commercial Achievements MHI’s Operating Commercial CO2 Capture Plants Malaysia India Client: Petoronas Start up: 1999~ Start-up: CO2 Source: Nat. Gas Reformer Capacity: 200 t/d Product: Urea Client: IFFCO Location: Aonla Start-up: Dec 2006~ CO2 Source: Nat. Gas Reformer Capacity: 450 t/d Product: Urea Japan India Client: Chemical Co. Start-up: Start up: 2005~ 2005 CO2 Source: Nat. Gas Boiler Capacity: 330 t/d Product: General use Client: IFFCO Location: Phulpur Start-up: Dec 2006~ CO2 Source: Nat. Gas Reformer Capacity: 450 t/d Product: Urea 1. MHI’s Commercial Achievements MHI’s MHI s Recently Awarded Commercial Projects OTHER PROJECTS Abu Dhabi India Bahrain ‘Asia’ Asia China Project Status Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction Under Construction FEED Complete Flue Gas Source Nat. Gas. Reformer Nat. Gas. Reformer Nat. Gas. Reformer Nat. Gas. Reformer Nat. Gas. Boiler Expected on stream 2009 2009 2010 2010 TBC CO2 Capture Capacity (T/D) 400 450 450 340 800 2. MHI’s long term 10 t/d CO2 capture demonstration tests from a coal fired boiler Coal Fired Long Term Demonstration Plant Plant Outline Solvent : C Capacity it : Feed Gas : Start-up : Location : KS-1 10 T/D Coal Fired Boiler (14.1 v% CO2) July 2006 Nagasaki, g , Japan p Operational experiences Increased understanding of the effects of impurities on the system (dust, SOx, NOx, etc.) Identifying and incorporating countermeasures for each impurity >5,000 hours of operation and experience Test results exceeded expectations and will facilitate scale up CO2 capture for coal fired boilers Confirms that the MHI CO2 capture process can be applied to coal fired flue gas streams 2. MHI’s long term 10 t/d CO2 capture demonstration tests from a coal fired boiler Coal Fired Long Term Demonstration Plant - Results Test Item Result • Achieve long term stable operation 9 >5000 hours of near continuous operation • Confirm effect of various impurities on CO2 capture process & equipment 9 Advanced know-how of the impacts of dust, SO2 and NOx • Achieve high CO2 purity performance 9 >99.9% achieved • Confirm heat consumption required for CO2 recovery 9 730-820 kcal/kg-CO2 (Improved process reduced by a further 15%) • Record pressure loss observed in the cooler and absorber 9 No major pressure fluctuations • Confirm process can be applied to coal fired flue gas 9 Yes - KM-CDR Process can be applied to coal fired power stations 3. MHI’s CO2 Recovery Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration Process Flow for Amine Absorption p Boiler Particulate Capture Facility DeNOx FGD Stack Flue Gas Outlet CO2 Purity 99.9 % Flue Gas Treated Flue Gas CO2 Capture Compression & Dehydration CO2 Product ABSORBER STRIPPER (Regenerator) C.W. Flue Gas Fl G Cooler/Deep FGD C.W. Flue Gas Pre-treated Flue gas C.W. Steam Reboiler 3. MHI’s CO2 Recovery Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration MHI’s Flue Gas CO2 Recovery y Improved p Process Recovered CO2 15% steam consumption reduction over MHI’s conventional p process Advanced process demonstrated at MHI’s Nanko Pilot Plant & Commercial Plants Process Features Utilize lean solvent and steam condensate heat for regeneration inside the stripper Heat Recovery & Solvent Regeneration Stripper CO2 Steam Lean solvent Performance Steam Condensate *Steam Consumption: 1.30 Ton Steam/ Ton CO2 (660 Kcal/ Kg CO2) Advanced Amine Solvent ‘KS-1’ Note: Steam = 3 BarG Saturated • High CO2 Loading *Regeneration Energy less than 700 Kcal/ Kg CO2 can be guaranteed Patent Application submitted in various countries • Low Solvent Degradation • Low L C Corrosion i • No Corrosion Inhibitor 3. MHI’s CO2 Recovery Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration MHI Heat integration g Concept(Base p( Case)) ① ② LP Steam extraction from the LP Turbine Recovery of overhead condenser heat LP Turbine HP/MP Turbine Air Heater ESP Boiler ① ② Reboiler Condenser Regenerator Condenser Deaerator Boiler Feed Water Pump JP Patent No. 207444 Boiler Feed Water Pump Boiler Feed Water Heater 3. MHI’s CO2 Recovery Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration MHI Heat integration g Concept p MP Turbine 900 C HP Turbine 800 A D G 700 Enthalpy (kcal/kg) Extraction to Reboiler B LP Turbine 600 E E Steam Condensing Curve 500 200 Reboiler Condensate Power loss of steam turbine Utilize this heat for the reboiler Waste Heat from the condenser H 100 F Condensate 0 Entropy (kcal/kg・K) Utilize waste heat of CO2 recovery 3. MHI’s CO2 Recovery Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration CO2 Recovery Plant Power Output Penalty Assessment and Heat Integration Options; 1) Base Case + 2) Recovery of Compression Heat 3) Recovery of Flue Gas Heat Power output penalty of CO2 capture and compression without heat integration CO2 Compressor Power Output (M MW) 1 000 1, 800 600 400 1200 Deep FGD CO2 Recovery Auxillary Equipment Power Loss by LP Steam Extraction Power Output Penalty by MHI CCCP (Base Case) 22% of Gross Output Power Output Penalty decreased to 20% 1000 800 Net Output + Plant Auxiliary Equipment Power Consumption 200 Power Output (M MW) 1,200 Net output improvement with heat integration Power Output Penalty by MHI CCCP 600 Net Output + Plant Auxiliary Equipment Power 400 CCCP: CO2 Capture, Compression Plant 200 0 0 1,070MW (Gross) Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power Plant; Bituminus Coal Case Without CCCP With MHI CCCP (Base Case) With MHI CCCP + Max Heat Integration 3. MHI’s CO2 Recovery Technology: Process Improvements & Heat Integration Multi Pollutant Test Plant (FGD & CO2 Capture) Multi-Pollutant Absorber 1 by 1 Scale Test Facility (400 MW equivalent) Absorber Spray pipes Fan 32 m Recirculation Pumps Commercial Scale Tests • Q1 2008 – Extensive E t i Liquid Distribution Tests • Rectangular Absorber • Panel Design 4. Phased approach to commercialization for Coal application MHI’s Operating Experience • Pilot plants (1-2 t/d) • Small scale demonstration plant (10 t/d) • Commercial plants (200-450 t/d) • Experience with natural gas and coal 2 t/d 10 t/d Pilot scale experience (Natural Gas & Coal) 200 t/d 330 t/d 450 t/d Commercial Experience (Natural Gas) 800 t/d ~500 t/d FEED Complete (Natural Gas) Phase 1 (Coal) Fulll scale com mmercial Med dium scale demo 1 t/d 3000 t/d ~3000 t/d Basic Design Complete (Nat. Gas) Phase 2 (Coal) 4. Phased approach to commercialization for Coal application MHI s Conceptual Schedule for a Medium – Large MHI’s Scale Coal Fired CO2 Capture Demonstration Plant Y Year 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Pilot Test (1 t/d) MHI Funded Coal Fired CO2 p Testing g Capture Small Scale Demo (10 t/d) Small Demo Operation Completed p -2p phases Medium Scale Demo (500 t/d) Demo Plant Starts Commercial Deployment (>3000 t/d) Commercial Plant Starts FEED Project Organization Construction Operation Note: This schedule is a conceptual figure only and shows MHI’s roadmap for the future commercialization of this technology for coal fired boilers 18 5. MHI’s Scope in a CCS Project Steam Turbine Boiler SCR NOx EP Dust FGD CO2 Capture SOx CO2 CO2 Transport CO2 Compression Centrifugal Compressors Coal Fired Power Station FGD CO2 Capture Plant ABSORBER COOLER STRIPPER DCFS MHI Can Supply All Technology – Efficient Integration 6. Conclusions Need for Carbon Capture & Storage ① Coal will remain a dominant fuel for electric power generation ② Coal with CCS technology can play an important part in CO2 mitigation - regulatory certainty and political support is needed ③ Governments must continue to support CCS and a ‘suite’ of carbon mitigation strategies ④ Incentives for first stage commercial CCS plants are necessary to reduce technical and financial uncertainties ⑤ Post combustion CO2 capture technology offers many advantages and can be transferred to developing countries ⑥ Allows for future zero emission use of coal