2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) New realizations of OTRA based sinusoidal oscillator Rajeshwari Pandey1, Neeta Pandey2, Gurumurthy Komanapalli3, Alok Kumar Singh4, Rashika Anurag5 1,2,3,4, 5 Department of Electronics and Communication Delhi Technological University, Delhi, INDIA 1 rajeshwaripandey@gmail.com,2n66pandey@rediffmail.co m, 3murthykgm@gmail.com, 4aloksingh.dce@gmail.com, Department of Electronics and Communication, JSS Academy of Technical Education, NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh, 5 raashika@rediffmail.com Abstract— Two new topologies of OTRA based sinusoidal oscillators are presented. The first topology makes use of lossless integrators. whereas the second topology is designed using a second order all pass section. The proposed topologies can be made fully integrated by implementing the resistors using matched transistors operating in linear region, which facilitates electronic tuning of oscillation frequency. The non-ideality analysis of the circuits is also given and for high frequency applications self compensation can be used. Workability of the proposed oscillators is verified through PSPICE simulations using 0.5ȝm AGILENT CMOS process parameters. The total harmonic distortion (THD) for both the designs is found to be quite low. OTRA has been extensively used as an analog building block for realizing a number of sinusoidal oscillators [8,9,13-21] which can be classified as those providing single phase [1315], quadrature phase [8,9 16-19] and multiphase [20,21] ouputs. In this paper two new realizations of OTRA based sinusoidal oscillators have been presented. One of the proposed configurations makes use of two lossless integrators connected in inverting and non inverting mode respectively whereas the other configuration uses a second order allpass section with unity feedback to form close loop. The proposed structures can be made fully integrated by implementing the resistors using matched transistors operating in linear region and thus can be tuned electronically. Keywords— Sinusoidal oscillator, OTRA, THD, Analog signal processing II. I. INTRODUCTION Oscillators are an important class of circuits and find wide application in communication, instrumentation, measurement, and control systems [1]. For these applications low value of total harmonic distortion (THD) is an essential requirement as higher harmonics have detrimental effects on electrical equipment. A variety of sinusoidal oscillators using op-amps, a representative voltage mode analog building block; are available in the literature [1-3]. However, these configurations are limited in their high frequency operations due to lower slew rate and constant gain-bandwidth product of the op-amps. Over the last few decades current-mode (CM) processing has emerged as an alternative design technique using current signals for signal processing [4]. The CM circuits are low impedance node networks; hence result in low time constant. This improves system performance in terms of speed and slew rate. Current- mode signal processing has resulted in emergence of numerous analog building blocks as mentioned in [senani] and references cited therin which are used for realization of various signal processing and generation circuits. The circuit element Operational Transresistance Amplifier (OTRA) [5] is one among those and is a current controlled voltage source (CCVS). Several high performance CMOS OTRA topologies have been proposed in literature [57] leading to growing interest in OTRA based analog signal processing and generation circuits [5, 8-21]. In recent past 978-1-4799-5991-4/15/$31.00 ©2015 IEEE CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION The OTRA is a high gain current input voltage output device. The circuit symbol of OTRA is shown in Fig. 1 and the port characteristics are given by (1), where Rm is transresistance gain of OTRA. For ideal operations the Rm of the OTRA approaches infinity and forces the input currents to be equal. ୮ Ͳ ୬ ൌ Ͳ ୫ VO Ͳ Ͳ െ ୫ Ͳ ୮ Ͳ൩ ୬ Ͳ (1) Figure1. OTRA Circuit symbol The input and output terminals of the OTRA are characterized by low impedance, thus the response limitations incurred by capacitive time constantscan be ignored [5]. 913 2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) CIRCUIT I Symbols ‘p’ and ‘n’ represent the non-inverting and the inverting terminals of the OTRA. As can be seen from the figure, the voltages at the drain and the source terminals for both MOSFETs are equal. On taking the difference of the currents flowing in the two transistors, the non linearity gets The first proposed oscillator configuration is shown in Fig.2.It consists of two lossless integrators forming a closed loop, connected in inverting and non inverting modes respectively. Figure 2 Circuit I The characteristic equation of the Circuit I can be deduced as ଶ ܥ ݏଵ ܥଶ ܴଶ ܴଵ ͳ ൌ Ͳ Figure 3 Circuit II (2) The frequency of oscillation (FO) from (2) can be deteremined as FO: ݂ ൌ ଵ ଶగ ଵ ට (3) భ మ ோమ ோభ From (3) it is clear that the circuit of Fig.2 results in sustained oscillations and the FO can be adjusted by varying either resistors or capacitor values. cancelled out. The resistor value realized can be expressed as CIRCUIT II ܴൌ The second design topology is shown in Fig.3. It is based on a single second order allpass section with unity feedback to form close loop. Routine analysis of the circuit of Fig. 2 results in following characteristic equation as Where ௐ ܭே ൌ ߤܥை ʹ ݏଶ ܿଵ ܿଶ ݏሾʹ భ ோమ ʹ మ ோభ െ భ ோభ ሿ ଶ ோభ ோమ ൌͲ Figure 4. The MOS based resistor ܥଵ ൌ Ͷܥଶ ǡ ܴଶ ൌ Ͷܴଵ FO: ݂ ൌ ଵ ට ଶ େ ଵ భ େ మ ୖభ ୖమ (4) ଵ ଼ୖେ (9) KN needs to be determined for the transistors being used to implement the resistors and ȝ, COX and W/L represent standard transistor parameters. The MOS based implementation of Circuit I is shown in Fig.5 (a) and that of circuit II is depicted in Fig. 5(b). (5) III. (6) NON IDEAL ANALYSIS The output of the oscillators may deviate due to non ideality of OTRA in practice. Ideally the transresistance gain Rm is assumed to approach infinity. However, practically Rm is a frequency dependent finite value. Considering a single pole model for the trans-resistance gain, Rm can be expressed as Denoting C2 and R1 by C and R respectively and using (5) the FO can be rewritten as ݂ൌ (8) From this characteristic equation the condition of oscillation (CO) and frequency of oscillation (FO) can be obtained as CO: ଵ ಿ ሺೌ ି್ ሻ (7) ܴ ሺݏሻ ൌ ቆ The current differencing property of the OTRA makes it possible to implement the resistors connected to the input terminals of OTRA, using MOS transistors with complete non linearity cancellation [5]. Each resistor requires two matched n-MOSFETs connected in a manner as shown in Fig 4 which represents a typical MOS implementation of resistance connected at negative input of OTRA. ோబ ೞ ഘబ ଵା ቇ (10) Where ܴ is dc transresistance gain. For high frequency applications the transresistance gain ܴ (s) reduces to ܴ ሺݏሻ ൌ ൬ ଵ ௦ ൰ where ܥ ൌ ଵ ோబ ఠబ Taking this effect into account (2) modifies to 914 (11) 2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) ݏଶ ሺܿଵ ܿ ሻሺܿଶ ܿ ሻܴଵ ܴଶ ͳ ൌ Ͳ and ܥଶ =25 pF, for circuit II . The simulated value of FO for both the topologies was observed to be 160 KHz. For Circuit I, the simulated steady state time domain output and corresponding frequency spectrum are shown in Fig.6 and those for Circuit II are depicted in Fig.7. (12) From (12) it is found that FO for circuit I changes to ݂ൌ ଵ ଶగ ටሺ ଵ (13) భ ା ሻሺమ ା ሻோభ ோమ (a) (a) (b) Figure.6 Output of Circuit I (a) Steady state (b) Frequency spectrum (b) Figure.5. The MOS-C realization of proposed circuits. (a) Circuit I (b) Circuit II Due to nonideality effect of OTRA the characteristic equation of circuit II modifies to ଶ ʹ ݏሺܿଵ ܿ ሻሺܿଶ ܿ ሻ ݏሾʹ ଶ ோభ ோమ ሺభ ା ሻ ோమ ʹ ሺమ ା ሻ ோభ ൌͲ െ (a) ሺభ ା ሻ ோభ ሿ (14) This results in modified FO as ݂ൌ ଵ ଶగ ටሺ ଵ భ ା ሻሺమ ା ሻோభ ோమ (15) The effect of Cp in (13) and (15) can be eliminated by preadjusting the values of capacitors C1, C2 thus achieving self compensation. IV. (b) Figure.7 Output of Circuit I (a) Steady state (b) Frequency spectrum The percentage total harmonic distortion (THD) as recorded in Table 1 is 2.89% for Circuit I. Similarly for Circuit II the THD is observed to be 1.07% as has been listed in Table 2. SIMULATION RESULTS The proposed sinusoidal undamped oscillators are verified through simulations using the CMOS implementation of the OTRA proposed in [6]. The SPICE simulations are performed using 0.5 ȝm CMOS process parameters provided by MOSIS (AGILENT). Supply voltages taken are ±1.5V. Both the topologies are designed for an FO of 159 KHz for which the component values are taken as ܴଵ ൌ ܴଶ ൌ ͳͲȳǡ ܥଵ ൌ ܥଶ ൌ ͳͲͲ for circuit I and ܴଵ ൌ ͳͲȳǡ ܴଶ ൌ40ȳ,ܥଵ =100 pF CONCLUSION Two new topologies of OTRA based sinusoidal oscillators are presented. The first topology makes use of lossless integrators. whereas the second topology is designed using a second order all pass section. Both the topologies are electronically tunable. Workability of the proposed oscillators is verified 915 2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) through PSPICE simulations using 0.5ȝm AGILENT CMOS process parameters. The total harmonic distortion (THD) for both the designs is found to be quite low. Table I. Total harmonic distortion for circuit I Harmoni Frequency Fourier Normalized (hz) Compone Component c nt No 1 1.600E+05 2.764E-01 1.000E+00 phase (deg) Normalized phase(deg) -1.784E+02 0.000E+00 -1.356E+02 2.211E+02 2 3.200E+05 4.466E-03 1.616E-02 3 4.800E+05 3.722E-03 1.347E-02 -1.408E+02 3.943E+02 4 6.400E+05 3.330E-03 1.205E-02 -1.529E+02 5.605E+02 5 8.000E+05 2.856E-03 1.033E-02 -1.669E+02 7.249E+02 6 7 8 9.600E+05 2.266E-03 1.120E+06 1.653E-03 1.280E+06 1.180E-03 8.199E-03 5.980E-03 4.267E-03 -1.798E+02 1.719E+02 1.727E+02 8.904E+02 1.420E+03 1.600E+03 9 1.440E+06 9.843E-04 3.561E-03 -1.785E+02 1.427E+03 10 1.600E+06 9.813E-04 3.550E-03 -1.747E+02 1.609E+03 Communication and Computer Technology, ICCCT-12, pp.77 -80, 2012. [6] Rajeshwari Pandey, Neeta Pandey, Gurumurthy Komanapalli and Rashika Anurag, “OTRA Based Voltage Mode Third Order Quadrature Oscillator,” ISRN Electronics Volume 2014, Article ID 126471, 5 pages [7] Cem Cakir, Ugur Cam, and Oguzhan Cicekoglu, “Novel Allpass Filter Con¿guration Employing Single OTRA,” IEEE transactions on circuits and systems—ii: express briefs, vol. 52, no. 3, pp.122-125, 2005 [8] Ahmet Gokcen and Ugur Cam “MOS-C single ampli¿er biquads using the operational transresistance ampli¿er,” Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ),vol.63, pp. 660–664, 2009. [9] Rajeshwari Pandey and Mayank Bothra “Multiphase Sinusoidal Oscillators Using Operational Trans-Resistance Amplifier”, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009). [10] Rajeshwari Pandey,Neeta Pandey,Mayank Bothra and Sajal K. Paul “Operational Transresistance Ampli¿er-Based Multiphase Sinusoidal Oscillators” Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Volume 2011, Article ID 586853, 8 pages doi:10.1155/2011/586853 TOTAL HARMONIC DISTORTION = 2.899574E+00 PERCENT Table II. Total harmonic distortion for circuit II Frequenc y (hz) Fourier Compone nt 1 1.600E+05 8.371E-02 Normalize d Componen t 1.000E+00 Harmonic No Phase (deg) -8.806E-01 Normalize d Phase(deg ) 0.000E+00 2 3.200E+05 7.362E-04 8.794E-03 1.122E+01 1.298E+01 3 4 4.800E+05 6.400E+05 3.345E-05 2.786E-04 3.996E-04 3.328E-03 -2.769E+01 -4.849E+00 -2.505E+01 -1.327E+00 5 8.000E+05 3.295E-04 3.936E-03 2.009E+01 2.449E+01 6 9.600E+05 1.451E-04 1.734E-03 -5.222E-01 4.761E+00 7 1.120E+06 1.527E-04 1.824E-03 -2.931E+01 -2.315E+01 8 1.280E+06 1.213E-04 1.449E-03 1.093E+01 1.798E+01 9 1.440E+06 1.008E-04 1.204E-03 3.406E+01 4.198E+01 10 1.600E+06 1.110E-04 1.326E-03 5.452E+00 1.426E+01 TOTAL HARMONIC DISTORTION = 1.075666E+00 PERCENT REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] operational transresistance amplifiers with MOS-C realization,” Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol. 19, pp. 363–372, 2011. K. N. Salama and A. M. Soliman, “Novel Oscillators using the operational transresistance amplifier, ” Microelectronics journal, vol. 31, pp. 39-47, 2000. Ugur Cam, “A Novel single resistance controlled sinusoidal oscillator employing single operational transresistance amplifier,” Analog integrated circuits and signal processing, vol.32, pp 183-186, 2002 Rajeshwari Pandey, Neeta Pandey, Rajendra Kumar, and Garima Solanki, “A Novel OTRA Based Oscillator with Non Interactive Control,” International conference on Communication and Computer Technology, ICCCT’10,2010. R. Pandey, N. Pandey and S.K. Paul, “MOS-C Third Order Quadrature Oscillator using OTRA,” Third International Conference on 916