Diversity in Science Poster Presentations
Hi Biol110,
Below is a line-up for the poster presentations tomorrow to make sure that everyone gets an equal
opportunity to present. We will have three (3) rounds of presentations. For rounds one (1) and two (2),
I have randomly selected partners for you to present to. For the final round, you are asked to walk
around and view at least 2 poster you have not previously had a chance to see. For the first two rounds,
each person will have 5 mins to present their poster, with 2 mins for questions, for a total of 15 mins per
round.
You will all be given a sheet to assess you classmates’ poster. You will be assessing on four (4) larger
criteria; 1) Creativity, 2) Content, 3) Clarity and Organization and 4) Engagement. Each section is
described on the rubric sheet.
You all have amazing posters and I am excited to learn more about the persons you have decided to
present on.
1. Sample Rubric
Area
Creativity
A
Student put
significant thought
into their choice of
person (person
chosen not largely
recognized)
B
Student put
thought into their
choice of person
(person chosen not
largely recognized)
C
Not much thought but
person still from an
underrepresented
group (person easily
recognizable)
D
Not much thought in
selection of person.
Person does not
belong to an
underrepresented
group
Content
Provides
information about
the person and their
contributions
Clear flow of story,
high quality of
graphics, organized
poster
Provides some
information about
the person and
their contributions
Somewhat clear
flow of story, high
quality of graphics,
somewhat
organized poster
Student mostly
knowledgeable and
engaged, answered
some questions
Provides little
information about the
person and their
contributions
Flow of story not clear
but high quality of
graphics. Poster
content not organized
Does not provide
information about the
person or their
contributions
Flow of story not clear.
Poster content not
organized
Student somewhat
knowledgeable and
engaged, could not
answer questions
Student not
knowledgeable or
engaged, could not
answer questions
Organization
and clarity:
Engagement
Student very
knowledgeable and
engaged, answered
questions
2. Presentation Assignments
Round 1
Strom, Anna
Swett, Robert
Dutcher, Arik
Arberry, Raina
Tangen, Cameron
Cichosz, Shawn
Scanlon, Bryce
Wickland, Conner
Jones, Lacey
Jahn, Benjamin
Gingrich, Amelia
Bal, Harkameljot
Bonn, Kyle
Livers, Miranda
Cane, Cassandra
Ruffin, Mikael
Frankel, Max
Brownstein, Sophia
Kim, Yun
Franko, Cole
Graham, Benjamin
Castillo-Flores,
Ricardo
Morita, Dana
Chawkins, Dania
Nelson, Andrew
Adams, Samuel
Giannini, Connor
Weiner, Andrew
Round 2
Strom, Anna
Livers, Miranda
Dutcher, Arik
Ruffin, Mikael
Tangen, Cameron
Brownstein, Sophia
Scanlon, Bryce
Franko, Cole
Jones, Lacey
Chawkins, Dania
Gingrich, Amelia
Giannini, Connor
Weiner, Andrew
Bonn, Kyle
Adams, Samuel
Cane, Cassandra
Swett, Robert
Frankel, Max
Arberry, Raina
Kim, Yun
Cichosz, Shawn
Graham, Benjamin
Wickland, Conner
Castillo-Flores, Ricardo
Jahn, Benjamin
Morita, Dana
Bal, Harkameljot
Nelson, Andrew