Uploaded by Raiza Dawn Dayot

Transpo Codal

advertisement
SECTION 4. - Common Carriers (n)
SUBSECTION 3. - Safety of Passengers
SUBSECTION 1. - General Provisions
Art. 1755. A common carrier is bound to carry the passengers
safely as far as human care and foresight can provide, using the
utmost diligence of very cautious persons, with a due regard for
all the circumstances.
Art. 1732. Common carriers are persons, corporations, firms or
associations engaged in the business of carrying or transporting
passengers or goods or both, by land, water, or air, for
compensation, offering their services to the public.
Art. 1733. Common carriers, from the nature of their business
and for reasons of public policy, are bound to observe
extraordinary diligence in the vigilance over the goods and for
the safety of the passengers transported by them, according to
all the circumstances of each case.
Such extraordinary diligence in the vigilance over the goods is
further expressed in Articles 1734, 1735, and 1745, Nos. 5, 6, and
7, while the extraordinary diligence for the safety of the
passengers is further set forth in Articles 1755 and 1756.
SUBSECTION 4. - Common Provisions
Art. 1764. Damages in cases comprised in this Section shall be
awarded in accordance with Title XVIII of this Book, concerning
Damages. Article 2206 shall also apply to the death of a
passenger caused by the breach of contract by a common carrier.
Art. 1765. The Public Service Commission may, on its own
motion or on petition of any interested party, after due hearing,
cancel the certificate of public convenience granted to any
common carrier that repeatedly fails to comply with his or its
duty to observe extraordinary diligence as prescribed in this
Section.
Art. 1766. In all matters not regulated by this Code, the rights
and obligations of common carriers shall be governed by the
Code of Commerce and by special laws.
Art. 1756. In case of death of or injuries to passengers, common
carriers are presumed to have been at fault or to have acted
negligently, unless they prove that they observed extraordinary
diligence as prescribed in Articles 1733 and 1755.
Art. 1757. The responsibility of a common carrier for the safety
of passengers as required in Articles 1733 and 1755 cannot be
dispensed with or lessened by stipulation, by the posting of
notices, by statements on tickets, or otherwise.
Art. 1758. When a passenger is carried gratuitously, a stipulation
limiting the common carrier's liability for negligence is valid, but
not for wilful acts or gross negligence.
The reduction of fare does not justify any limitation of the
common carrier's liability.
Art. 1759. Common carriers are liable for the death of or injuries
to passengers through the negligence or wilful acts of the
former's employees, although such employees may have acted
beyond the scope of their authority or in violation of the orders
of the common carriers.
This liability of the common carriers does not cease upon proof
that they exercised all the diligence of a good father of a family
in the selection and supervision of their employees.
Art. 1760. The common carrier's responsibility prescribed in the
preceding article cannot be eliminated or limited by stipulation,
by the posting of notices, by statements on the tickets or
otherwise.
Art. 1761. The passenger must observe the diligence of a good
father of a family to avoid injury to himself.
Art. 1762. The contributory negligence of the passenger does not
bar recovery of damages for his death or injuries, if the
proximate cause thereof is the negligence of the common
carrier, but the amount of damages shall be equitably reduced.
Art. 1763. A common carrier is responsible for injuries suffered
by a passenger on account of the wilful acts or negligence of
other passengers or of strangers, if the common carrier's
employees through the exercise of the diligence of a good father
of a family could have prevented or stopped the act or omission.
SUBSECTION 2. - Vigilance Over Goods
Art. 1734. Common carriers are responsible for the loss,
destruction, or deterioration of the goods, unless the same is due
to any of the following causes only:
(1) Flood, storm, earthquake, lightning, or other natural disaster
or calamity;
(2) Act of the public enemy in war, whether international or civil;
(3) Act of omission of the shipper or owner of the goods;
(4) The character of the goods or defects in the packing or in the
containers;
(5) Order or act of competent public authority.
Art. 1735. In all cases other than those mentioned in Nos. 1, 2, 3,
4, and 5 of the preceding article, if the goods are lost, destroyed
or deteriorated, common carriers are presumed to have been at
fault or to have acted negligently, unless they prove that they
observed extraordinary diligence as required in Article 1733.
Art. 1741. If the shipper or owner merely contributed to the loss,
destruction or deterioration of the goods, the proximate cause
thereof being the negligence of the common carrier, the latter
shall be liable in damages, which however, shall be equitably
reduced.
Art. 1742. Even if the loss, destruction, or deterioration of the
goods should be caused by the character of the goods, or the
faulty nature of the packing or of the containers, the common
carrier must exercise due diligence to forestall or lessen the loss.
Art. 1743. If through the order of public authority the goods are
seized or destroyed, the common carrier is not responsible,
provided said public authority had power to issue the order.
Art. 1744. A stipulation between the common carrier and the
shipper or owner limiting the liability of the former for the loss,
destruction, or deterioration of the goods to a degree less than
extraordinary diligence shall be valid, provided it be:
Art. 1736. The extraordinary responsibility of the common
carrier lasts from the time the goods are unconditionally placed
in the possession of, and received by the carrier for
transportation until the same are delivered, actually or
constructively, by the carrier to the consignee, or to the person
who has a right to receive them, without prejudice to the
provisions of Article 1738.
(1) In writing, signed by the shipper or owner;
(2) Supported by a valuable consideration other than the service
rendered by the common carrier; and
(3) Reasonable, just and not contrary to public policy.
Art. 1737. The common carrier's duty to observe extraordinary
diligence over the goods remains in full force and effect even
when they are temporarily unloaded or stored in transit, unless
the shipper or owner has made use of the right of stoppage in
transitu.
g
Art. 1738. The extraordinary liability of the common carrier
continues to be operative even during the time the goods are
stored in a warehouse of the carrier at the place of destination,
until the consignee has been advised of the arrival of the goods
and has had reasonable opportunity thereafter to remove them
or otherwise dispose of them.
Art. 1747. If the common carrier, without just cause, delays the
transportation of the goods or changes the stipulated or usual
route, the contract limiting the common carrier's liability cannot
be availed of in case of the loss, destruction, or deterioration of
the goods.
Art. 1739. In order that the common carrier may be exempted
from responsibility, the natural disaster must have been the
proximate and only cause of the loss. However, the common
carrier must exercise due diligence to prevent or minimize loss
before, during and after the occurrence of flood, storm or other
natural disaster in order that the common carrier may be
exempted from liability for the loss, destruction, or deterioration
of the goods. The same duty is incumbent upon the common
carrier in case of an act of the public enemy referred to in Article
1734, No. 2.
Art. 1740. If the common carrier negligently incurs in delay in
transporting the goods, a natural disaster shall not free such
carrier from responsibility.
Art. 1745. Any of the following or similar stipulations shall be
considered unreasonable, unjust and contrary to public policy:
Art. 1746. An agreement limiting the common carrier's liability
may be annulled by the shipper or owner if the common carrier
refused to carry the goods unless the former agreed to such
stipulation.
Art. 1748. An agreement limiting the common carrier's liability
for delay on account of strikes or riots is valid.
Art. 1749. A stipulation that the common carrier's liability is
limited to the value of the goods appearing in the bill of lading,
unless the shipper or owner declares a greater value, is binding.
Art. 1750. A contract fixing the sum that may be recovered. by
the owner or shipper for the loss, destruction, or deterioration
of the goods is valid, if it is reasonable and just under the
circumstances, and has been fairly and freely agreed upon.
Art. 1751. The fact that the common carrier has no competitor
along the line or route, or a part thereof, to which the contract
refers shall be taken into consideration on the question of
whether or not a stipulation limiting the common carrier's
liability is reasonable, just and in consonance with public policy.
Art. 1752. Even when there is an agreement limiting the liability
of the common carrier in the vigilance over the goods, the
common carrier is disputably presumed to have been negligent
in case of their loss, destruction or deterioration.
Art. 1753. The law of the country to which the goods are to be
transported shall govern the liability of the common carrier for
their loss, destruction or deterioration.
Art. 1754. The provisions of Articles 1733 to 1753 shall apply to
the passenger's baggage which is not in his personal custody or
in that of his employee. As to other baggage, the rules in Articles
1998 and 2000 to 2003 concerning the responsibility of hotelkeepers shall be applicable.
Download