Making PowerPoint Slides Avoiding the Pitfalls of Bad Slides Presentation Guidelines 2 Don’t use (presented by) or (Name) words in title slide. Don’t use Mr. or Ms., may use Dr. or Prof. with name. Don’t use Wikipedia or other un-authenticated sources. Get the technical material from books, periodicals, etc. Last slide should be bibliography (references) Slide number must be added (insert slide number from Menu) How to Use this Template 3 This presentation template has all the formatting inbuilt Save this template with the name of the presentation you want to prepare Read all the guidelines – slides Delete the slides not required by you Add new slides by selecting “New Slide” option type of slide All the formatting is automatically available You can change the template design using “Design” option How to Use this Template 4 Your first slide should be Title slide Next Slide will contain “Contents” or “Outline” Then all the slides as per requirement Last slide should be “Summary” or “Conclusions” Add “References” after “Summary” or “Conclusions” Next is “Questions?” Finally “Thank You” <Title of Presentation> <Name of Presenter> <Class> <Roll No> Guide: <Guide Name> Chemical Engineering Department AISSMS College of Engineering, Pune -1 Outline or Contents (to be Covered) 6 Outlines Slide Structure Fonts Colour Background Graphs Spelling and Grammar Conclusions References Questions Outline Make your 1st or 2nd slide an outline of your presentation – Follow the order of your outline for the rest of the presentation Only place main points on the outline slide – 7 Ex: previous slide Ex: Use the titles of each slide as main points Slide Structure – Good 8 Use 1-2 slides per minute of your presentation Write in point form, not complete sentences Include a maximum of 8-10 points per slide Avoid wordiness: use key words and phrases only Slide Structure - Bad 9 This page contains too many words for a presentation slide. It is not written in point form, making it difficult both for your audience to read and for you to present each point. Although there are exactly the same number of points on this slide as the previous slide, it looks much more complicated. In short, your audience will spend too much time trying to read this paragraph instead of listening to you. Slide Structure – Good (Not Mandatory) Show one point at a time: – – – 10 Will help audience concentrate on what you are saying Will prevent audience from reading ahead Will help you keep your presentation focused Slide Structure - Bad 11 Do not use distracting animation Do not go overboard with the animation Be consistent with the animation that you use Fonts - Good Use at least an 18-point font Use different size fonts for main points and secondary points – 12 this font is 24-point, the main point font is 28-point, and the title font is 36-point Use a standard font Arial Fonts - Bad 13 If you use a small font, your audience won’t be able to read what you have written DO NOT CAPITALIZE. IT IS DIFFICULT TO READ Don’t use a complicated font Colour - Good Use a colour of font that contrasts sharply with the background – Use colour to reinforce the logic of your structure – Ex: light blue title and dark blue text Use colour to emphasize a point – 14 Ex: blue font on white background But only use this occasionally Colour - Bad Using a font colour that does not contrast with the background colour is hard to read Using colour for decoration is distracting and annoying. Using a different colour for each point is unnecessary – 15 Using a different colour for secondary points is also unnecessary Trying to be creative can also be bad Background - Good 16 Use backgrounds such as this one that are attractive but simple Use backgrounds which are light Use the same background consistently throughout your presentation Background – Bad 17 Avoid backgrounds that are distracting or difficult to read from Always be consistent with the background that you use Graphs - Good Use graphs rather than just charts and words – – 18 Data in graphs is easier to comprehend & retain than is raw data Trends are easier to visualize in graph form Always title (label) for your graphs (description) Tables - Bad January February Blue Balls 20.4 27.4 Red Balls 30.6 38.6 19 March 90 34.6 April 20.4 31.6 Graphs - Good Items Sold in First Quarter of 2002 100 90 80 70 60 Blue Balls Red Balls 50 40 30 20 10 0 January 20 February March April Graphs - Bad 100 90 90 80 70 60 Blue Balls 50 Red Balls 38.6 40 34.6 31.6 30.6 27.4 30 20.4 20.4 20 10 0 January 21 February March April Graphs – Bad (Previous Slide) 22 Minor gridlines are unnecessary Font is too small Colours are illogical Title is missing Shading is distracting Spelling and Grammar Proof your slides for: – – – 23 speling mistakes the use of of repeated words grammatical errors you might have make If English is not your first language, please have someone else check your presentation! Conclusions Use an effective and strong closing – Use a conclusion slide to: – – 24 Your audience is likely to remember your last words Summarize the main points of your presentation (not detailed description) Suggest future avenues of research References Use the standards given in the following slides for references. 25 References Books Eckhoff, R. K., “Dust Explosions in the Process Industries,” 3rd ed., Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, TX (2003). Rothenberg, G., “Catalysis: Concepts and Green Applications,” WileyVCH, Weinheim, Germany (2008). Allen, M. P., and D. J. Tildesley, “Computer Simulation of Liquids,” Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K. (1987). Doherty, M. F., et al., “Distillation,” Section 13 in Green, D. W., and R. H. Perry, eds., “Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook,” 8th ed., McGrawHill, New York, NY (2008). 26 References Papers Babb, S. E., Jr., “Parameters in the Simon Equation Relating Pressure and Melting Temperature,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 35 (2), pp. 400– 413 (1963). Bertrand, R. R., and J. H. Siegell, “Emissions of Trace Compounds from Catalytic Reforming Units,” Environmental Progress, 22 (1) pp. 74–77 (Apr. 2003). Wolsky, A. M., et al., “CO2 Capture from the Flue Gas of Conventional Fossil-Fuel-Fired Power Plants,” Environmental Progress, 13 (3), pp. 214–219 (Aug. 1994). 27 References Meeting Papers and Presentations Benin, A., et al., “Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for CO2 Capture,” presented at the 2008 AIChE Spring National Meeting, New Orleans, LA (Apr. 7–9, 2008). Baldwin, P., “Ramgen Power Systems Low-Cost, High-Efficiency CO2 Compressor,” presented at the 7th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration, Pittsburgh, PA (May 5–8, 2008). McLarnon, C. R., and J. L. Duncan, “Testing of Ammonia-Based CO2 Capture with Multi-Pollutant Control Technology,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Washington, DC (Nov. 16–20, 2008). 28 References Government Agency Publications U.S. Chemical Safety and Investigation Board, “Combustible Dust Hazard Study,” Investigation Report 2006-H-1, CSB, Washington, DC (Nov. 2006). U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board, “Improving Reactive Hazards,” www.csb.gov/reports, CSB, Washington, DC (2002). 29 References Government Regulations U.S. Occupational Health and Safety Administration, “Standard for Hazardous Materials — Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals,” 29 CFR 1910.119. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “National Emissions Standards for Equipment Leaks — Control Level 2 Standards,” 40 CFR 63, Supbart UU. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing and Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing: Proposed Rule,” Federal Register, 67 (65), pp. 16154–16259, www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/mon/monpg.html (Apr. 2, 2002). 30 References Industry Standards National Fire Protection Association, “Standard for the Prevention of the Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids,” NFPA 654, NFPA, Quincy, MA (2006). Instrument Society of America, “Application of Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industries (S84.01 Standard),” ANSI/ISAS84.01-1996, ISA, Research Triangle Park, NC (Feb. 1996). 31 References Technical Society and Industry Association Publications American Petroleum Institute, “Development of Emission Factors for Leaks in Refinery Components in Heavy Liquid Service,” Publication No. 337, API, Washington, DC (Aug. 1996). American Petroleum Institute, “Evaporative Loss from Storage Tank Floating Roo Landings,” Technical Report 2567, API, Washington, DC (2005). 32 Questions?? End your presentation with a simple question slide to: – – – 33 Invite your audience to ask questions Provide a visual aid during question period Avoid ending a presentation abruptly 34