CRITERION 2
TeachingLearning and
Evaluation
Criterion 2:
Teaching-Learning and
Evaluation
KEY INDICATORS:
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
2.1 Student Enrollment Process
Registration on DTE
web site for CET
Exam
Check Admission
Status
Find ARC
(Application
Reporting Centre)
for admission
Check MH-CET
Result
Fill up On-line
Option Form
Approach the
College for
Admission
Find FC (Facilitation
center)
Shortlist Your
Preferred College
Online Registration
for cap round and
documents verified
at FC
Check Provisional
Merit List
2.2.1 Student Diversity 2017-18 (MBA)
STUDENTS ENROLLED
FOR 2017-2018
TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS
6; 7%
SC
MS
ST
OMS
27%
36%
80;
93%
NT-A
0%
1%
5% 0%
MALE v/s FEMALE
RATIO
FOR 2017-18
10%
MALE
37%
63%
VJ
FEMALE
4%
15%
NT-B
NT-C
NT-D
OBC
SBC
OPEN
2%
2.2.1 Assessment of Learning Levels of Students
Skill Set
Learning Abilities
Knowledge
Class Participation
Learning Levels
of Students
 Admission
 Analysis of Graduation and
Entrance Exam Score
 Aptitude Test during Induction
Program
 List of Advanced and Slow
Learners
 Validation
from
Class
Coordinator/Faculty/Mentor
 Involvement of Advanced and
SPPU Result
Slow learners in various cocurricular activities
 Mentorship- Counseling
5
2.2.1 Learning Levels
Slow Learner
Advanced Learner
Mentorship Program
Value Added Courseseg. HR Generalist,
Equity Analytics etc.
Extra Lectures/
Remedial Classes
On The Job Training/
Entrepreneurship
Workshops
Self-Learning Sessions
Certificates & Medals
Subject-wise
counselling by faculty
members
NIPM Platform for
Industry Exposure
6
2.3 Teaching-Learning @ IIMS
Robust
Feedback
Mechanism
Transparency
in Continuous
Internal
Evaluation
System
Supporting
Infrastructur
e
Competent
Human
Resource
Placements,
Results and
Higher
Studies
Student
Mentorship
Program
Innovative
Teaching
Learning
Methods
Student
Training
Program
Case Study
7
2.3 Teaching Methods/Pedagogy
Industry Visits
Institute and Industry Interface
Guest Lectures
Assignments
Group Discussion
Role Playing
Activity Based Learning
Management Games
Case Studies
Presentations
Class Room Learning
2.3.1 Student Centric Methods
Experiential
Learning
•
•
•
•
•
•
On Job Training
Computer Lab (CAPPTL, Ms Excel Lab)
Internships
Dissertation
Volunteering
Assignment
Participative
Learning
•
•
•
•
•
Role Plays
Management Games
Group Discussion
Presentation of Experiences
Interactive Lectures
Problem Solving
Methodology
• Case Study Approach
• Simulation Exercises
• Project Based Learning
9
2.3.2 Percentage of teachers using ICT for effective
teaching with Learning Management Systems (LMS), Elearning resources etc.
• Response: 100
2.3.3 Ratio of students to mentor for academic
and stress related issues
• Response: 9.27
2.3.2.1 Number of teachers using
ICT
• Response: 15
2.3.3 Ratio of students to mentor for academic
and stress related issues
• Response: 9.27
2.3.3.1 Number of mentors
• Response: 15
2.3.4 Innovation and creativity in
teaching-learning
• Innovative approaches used for effective
teaching learning are :
I. Outcome-Based Learning (OBE),
II. Student-Centred Learning (SCL),
III. Problem-based learning (PBL),
IV. Case Study (CS)
2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers
against sanctioned posts during the last five
years
• Response: 100
2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers
with Ph.D. during the last five years
2.4.3 Teaching experience per
full time teacher in number of
years
• Response: 16.33
2.4.4 Percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition,
fellowships at State, National, International level from Government,
recognised bodies during the last five years
• Response: 0
2.4.4.1 Number of full time teachers receiving awards from state
/national /international level from Government recognized bodies yearwise during the last five years
2.4.5 Average percentage of full time teachers from other States
against sanctioned posts during the last five years
• Response: 22.17
2.5.1 Reforms in Continuous Internal
Evaluation(CIE) system at the institutional level
The university of Pune has adopted major reform
in the evaluation by introducing Choice Based
Credit System (CBCS) from the academic year
2013-14 and the institute has adopted the same.
The evaluation has three Components:
1. University Examination: 50 Marks ( 5 questions with internal option
spread across 5 topics).
2. Online Examination: 20 Marks conducted by the University.
3. Concurrent Internal Evaluation: 30 Marks based on continuous
internal evaluation carried by individual faculty members (applicable
across all the semesters).
2.5.2 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent
and robust in terms of frequency and variety
• The COE is nominated by the Institute for
every term which is further approved by the
University for the smooth conduct of
Examinations.
• Major Academic Reform at the University
Level:
• University syllabus has undergone the major
reform in the academic year 2013-14 and the
pattern was set as Choice Based Credit System
(CBCS).
• Reforms at the Institute level:
2.5.3 Mechanism to deal with examination related grievances is
transparent, time-bound and efficient
•
Response:
•
Institute Level:
•
There is complete transparency in the internal assessment. The criterion adopted is as directed by the University.
•
The students are informed about various components of CIE before commencement of every semester by the respective faculty
members.
•
CEO appointed by the Institute is recognized by the University ,who communicates the examination time table declared by the university
well in advance with the students, plans for the invigilation and executes the examination as per the norms under the vigilance of external
supervisors and internal flying squads.
•
After every examination the sealed packages of the answer sheets are transferred to the CAP center and office copy of the receipts of
answer sheet is maintained by the exam committee. This transparency in the process ensures low/no complaints/ grievances in the exams.
•
University Level:
•
Students apply for revaluation and verification of marks. The University provides the photocopy of answer books to students
on demand after paying some fee. After receiving own answer-sheet if student wants he/she can apply for reassessment of
answer book. In addition, follow up is kept with the University until the grievance is settled.
•
If the student is not satisfied with this decision, he/she can submit appeal to the higher authorities (Registrar/ VC) within a
stipulated time.
•
University level committee shall process grievance(s) submitted by the students within a stipulated period.
2.5.4 The institution adheres to the academic
calendar for the conduct of CIE
• Response:
• The Institute holds ISO 9001:2008 certificate
(Certificate number FS593359) and in 2018 it has
received ISO 9001:2015 certificates signifies that
Institute follows Quality Management System which
ensures academic calendar designing process as an
inherent part of the academic planning.
• The Institute strongly trusts on in transparency in its
functioning. The institute has a well-defined standard
operating procedure to develop the academic teaching
plans and it follows a well-defined academic calendar.
• The academic calendar uploaded by the Savitribai
Phule Pune University forms the basis for designing
institutional academic calendar.
• The suggestions given by the Governing Body are
incorporated in the academic calendar before it is
2.6.1 Program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course
outcomes for all programs offered by the Institution are stated and
displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students
Response:
• Hard Copy of syllabi and Learning Outcomes
are available in the Institute for ready
reference to the Faculty members and
students
• The Institute adheres to the guidelines set by
Savitribai Phule Pune University.
• The Bloom's Taxonomy is referred for the
CO,PO & PSO.
• Learning Outcomes of the Programs of
Courses are displayed on the website of the
2.6.2 Attainment of program outcomes, program
specific outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated
by the institution
• Response:
The program/learning outcomes are:
• 1. The Students will evince knowledge of basic management
concepts.
• 2. The Students will be able to develop the Ability to develop
the Value based Leadership ability
• 3.The Students will apply knowledge of management theories
and practices to solve business problems
• 4.The Students will exhibit ability to comprehend and solve
multidisciplinary business related problems through
systematic approach.
• 5.The Students will demonstrate knowledge of values and
professional ethics in their activities.
• 6. The Students will recognize the need for and develop an
ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the
broadest context of change in business environment.
• 7. The Students will be able to create, select, and apply
Contd..
• The process of mapping the course outcomes at
the institute:
• Every year after the declaration of the results by
Savitribai Phule Pune University, institute prepares
the result analysis to map the and course
outcomes against each and every student to
understand the attainment
• of the outcomes and same is compared with the
overall result of the university. Institute has a
continuous feedback mechanism wherein every
stakeholder shares the feedback about the
syllabus which helps in fine tuning of the outcomes
by matching with the stakeholders expectation.
2.6.3 Average pass percentage of
Students
• Response: 72.41
• 2.6.3.1 Total number of final year students
who passed the examination conducted by
Institution.
• Response: 42
• 2.6.3.2 Total number of final year students
who appeared for the examination
conducted by the institution
2.7.1 SSR
• 3.75/4