LAB REPORT DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS DEPARTMENT OF POLYMER ENGINEERING SPRING 2020 VISHAL TYAGI 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 PROCEDURE..........................................................................................................................6 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS......................................................................................................9 RESULTS...............................................................................................................................10 CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................................13 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................13 FIGURES Figure 1. Representative applied sinusoidal load and measured sinusoidal response of the specimen………………………………………………………………………….………………….03 Figure 2. Schematic plot of the occurrence of a glass transition process and its respective classification…………………………………………………………………………………..……..05 Figure 3 . Experimental objective of determining activation energy of glass transition process……………………………………………………………………………………...………..05 Figure 4. Dynamic mechanical analysis apparatus, TA Instruments Q800 DMA………..…..06 Figure 5. Schematic illustration of film tension clamp for Q800 DMA. ……………….………07 Figure 6 . Plot for determining activation energy………………………………………...………09 Figure 7 . Plot of cos(δ) Vs Temperature……………………………………………………………10 Figure 8 . Plot of sin(δ) Vs Temperature……………………………………………………........….11 TABLES Table 1. Regression statistics for line of fit……………………………………………………....09 2 INTRODUCTION Polymers, because of their viscoelastic nature, exhibit behavior during deformation which is both temperature and time (frequency) dependent. For example, if a polymer is subjected to a constant load, the elastic modulus exhibited by the material will decrease over a period of time. This occurs because the polymer under a load undergoes molecular rearrangement in an attempt to minimize localized stresses. Hence, modulus (stiffness) measurements performed over a short time span result in higher values than longer term measurements. This time dependent behavior would seem to imply that to accurately evaluate material performance for a specific application, one needs to test the material under the actual temperature and time conditions it will see in end-use. Fortunately, that type of tedious testing is not necessary .Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) is a technique which measures the modulus (stiffness) and damping (energy dissipation) properties of a material as the material is deformed under periodic stress. It is one of the best thermal analysis techniques for using this time/temperature predictive approach. In dynamic mechanical analysis,Tg can either be defined as the temperature where the maximum loss tangent or the maximum loss modulus is observed, or as the inflexion point at which a significant drop of the storage modulus occurs. However,the respective peaks or points usually occur at different temperatures which results in a broad transition region for polymeric materials. In addition to the inherent chemical properties and the used criterion of es-timating theTg value, factors related to instrument and test conditions, such as test frequency, heating rate, sample size and clamping effects can also influence the measured Tg value. It has been reported that increasing the test frequency or heating rate leads to a shift of Tg to higher temperatures. The bond rotations and segmental motion associated with temperature above glass transition are responsible for the rubbery state of polymers .The energy associated with these phenomena is the activation energy.once the activation energy barrier is crossed the polymer chains are free to move. Activation energy can be measured using the arrhenius relation , If a DMA scan is performed with multiple frequencies, one may get an estimate of the activation energy by plotting the tan delta maximum temperatures (1/T) measured at different frequencies vs. log frequency. 3 BACKGROUND AND THEORY Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) is a characterization tool that is used to determine the viscoelastic properties of materials. DMA is sometimes referred to as a thermal analysis technique as it can be used to detect temperature sensitive molecular phenomena such as the glass transition and crystallization. In DMA, the transient or dynamic viscoelastic properties can be measured. Transient viscoelastic properties refer to tests such as creep or stress relaxation where either an instantaneous stress or strain is applied to the specimen and the strain or stress monitored as a function of time respectively. The dynamic viscoelastic properties refer to tests where the specimen is under a sinusoidal (time-varying) deformation. DMA is able to differentiate the elastic and viscous components of the viscoelastic response. In our experiment we will be applying a sinusoidal strain to the sample at different rates (i.e frequencies). Figure 1. Representative applied sinusoidal load and measured sinusoidal response of the specimen. For viscoelastic materials, the measured sinusoidal response is typically out of phase with the input sinusoidal load. If the phase difference (also called phase angle), δ, is 0o the material is purely elastic, and if δ is 90o then the material is purely viscous. Viscoelastic materials such as polymers typically have 0o < δ < 90o. The elastic response of the material denotes the tendency to store energy while the viscous response denotes the tendency to dissipate energy. Viscoelastic properties are dependent on temperature and time. Controlling the rate at which the sinusoidal load is applied enables the study of time effects on viscoelastic properties. DMA 4 can be used to prescribe practical end-use applications as it forms the basis for predicting polymer performance under load, temperature and time (or frequency). The measured stress and strain values are functions of temperature, frequency and applied load. There are basically two types of DMA measurement. Deformation-controlled tests apply a sinusoidal deformation to the specimen and measure the stress. Force-controlled tests apply a dynamic sinusoidal stress and measure the deformation. Dynamic load may essentially be achieved in free vibration or in forced vibration. Also, Molecular motion is impacted by the rate of deformation. The glass transition process is a kinetically trapped non-equilibrium phenomenon and its manifestation can be impacted by the rate of sample deformation as well. When frequency is increased, the respective relaxation may only occur at higher temperatures and thus an apparent increase in Tg is observed. The loading of a viscoelastic material with a sinusoidal strain is represented as, ε∗ = ε0ππ₯π(πππ‘) Where ε0 is the strain amplitude, ω is the angular frequency (= 2f) of the strain oscillation and t is the elapsed time. The stress response, π∗, of the viscoelastic material to the sinusoidal strain is represented as, π∗ = π0ππ₯π[π(ππ‘ + πΏ)] where πΏ is the phase angle and π0 is the stress amplitude. The complex modulus E* can therefore be represented in the form, πΈ∗ = π∗/ε∗ = πΈ′ + π πΈ′′ = |πΈ∗|ππ₯π(ππΏ) where |E*| is the absolute modulus which is (πΈ′2 + πΈ′′2 )0.5 The storage modulus, E’, is defined as, πΈ′ = |πΈ∗|πππ (πΏ) and the loss modulus, E’’, is defined as, πΈ′′ = |πΈ∗|π ππ(πΏ) The storage and loss modulus are related through, π‘ππ(πΏ) =πΈ′′/πΈ′ Notice E’, E’’ and tan (δ) are functions of the angular frequency. 5 Temperature sweeps in DMA can be used to determine the glass transition temperature, Tg, due to the sudden changes in E’ and E’’ as Tg occurs. The criteria for determining Tg is typically a matter of resolution as E’, E’’ and tan δ can be used to determine Tg. Conventionally, the temperature at which E’’ or tan δ go through a peak maximum is usually considered as Tg. In this experiment tan δ was used to determine Tg. Figure 2. Schematic plot of the occurrence of a glass transition process and its respective classification. When using tan δ to monitor Tg, the temperature at which the peak is maximum will vary as a function of deformation frequency. Tg will shift to higher temperatures with increasing frequencies. An Arrhenius relationship can be used to describe the relationship between frequency and Tg, π = ππππ₯π(−πΈπ΄ /π ππ) where f0 is a frequency coefficient (sometimes referred to as an activation frequency), R is the universal gas constant and EA is the activation energy. A plot of ln f versus 1/ Tg should yield a linear relationship if the system follows an Arrhenius behavior. The activation energy can be calculated as the slope of line times the gas constant R. Figure 3 . Experimental objective of determining activation energy of glass transition process. 6 EXPERIMENTAL Material: Natural Rubber For this experiment, a TA Instruments Q800 Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (DMA) was used. Figure 4. Dynamic mechanical analysis apparatus, TA Instruments Q800 DMA. In this equipment, oscillatory and static forces are enabled by a non-contact, direct drive motor that is thermostated and has low compliance. A wide range of material properties can be measured due to the rapid and reproducible forces that can be generated. Forces from the drive motor are transmitted directly to an air bearing slide. Pressurized air flows to the bearing and permits a near frictionless surface that makes the slide essentially float. Displacement is measured by a linear optical encoder that uses light diffraction patterns through a stationary and moveable grating which gives high resolution to measure very small amplitudes. A variety of clamps are available for use on the Q800 DMA to enable different sample deformation modes. For this experiment we used the film/fiber tension clamp geometry where the sample is mounted between a fixed and moveable clamp, which is ideal for tensile studies on films and fibers. Figure 5. Schematic illustration of film tension clamp for Q800 DMA. 7 The stages involved in a DMA measurement are as follows: 1.choose a load appropriate to the problem, and a clamping device, 2.prepare specimen (geometry, degree of plane-parallelism) 3.clamp the specimen 4.choose measuring parameters Factors exerting an influence on the apparatus and specimen are: 1. Clamps 2. Specimen geometry 3. Frequency 4. Type of load 5. Temperature program 6. Tightening torque Influential factors PROCEDURE: 1.The average length and thickness of tensile testing specimens was measured and provided as input into the sample geometry section in the TA Thermal Advantage software. 2.When loading the sample, care should be taken to ensure proper vertical alignment. 3.Frequency was held constant while the temperature was ramped from -80ºC to 0ºC at a rate of 2ºC/min. 4.The equipment was run in strain-controlled mode at a strain value of 0.1%. 5.A pre-load force of 0.01 N was applied to the fiber to keep the specimen taut prior to the start of the experiment to establish a baseline length. A force track value of 125% was enabled to ensure the specimen stays taut during the experiment. 6.Prior to the start of the experiment, the specimen was equilibrated at -80 oC for two minutes. 7.The temperature sweep data was collected. 7.The same process was repeated for frequencies 1, 2, 3, 5 10, 15, 20, 30 and 50 Hz. 8 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 1.calculation of activation energy π = ππππ₯π(−πΈπ΄ /π ππ) Taking log on both sides we obtain ln(π)= ln(ππ) - πΈπ΄ /π ππ This is a form of general equation of a straight type Y= mX + C Where m = slope of straight line Comparing the slope from the plot we get m= - πΈπ΄ /π ⇒πΈπ΄ = - (Slope) x R = -(-20133) X 8.314= 167386 J Calculation of storage and loss modulus from tan Tan(πΏ) = 0.04457015 ⇒(πΏ) = π‘ππ−1 (0.04457015)= 2.551992 Loss modulus Sin (πΏ) = sin (2.551992) = 0.044525 Storage modulus Cos (πΏ) = cos (2.551992) = 0.9990 9 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Activation energy measurements Ln(f) Vs 1/T 4.5 4 3.5 3 Ln(f),Hz 2.5 2 y = -20160x + 90.804 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.00425 -0.5 0.00430 0.00435 0.00440 0.00445 0.00450 0.00455 1/T (1/k) Figure 6 . Plot for determining activation energy Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.990307 R Square 0.980709 Adjusted R Square 0.977953 Standard Error 0.195149 Observations 9 Table 1. Regression statistics for line of fit. Using the Arrhenius relation, the activation energy was calculated and was observed to be 167386 J..the line of fit has a R Square value of 0.980709 which implies that it fits approximately 98 % of the values. 10 All semi crystalline and amorphous Polymers exhibit a glass transition. The glass transition is the property of the amorphous part of the polymer. As the temperature is decreased polymers turn from an amorphous state of low viscosity to a supercooled liquid with very high viscosity. This transition is characterized by the glass transition temperature (Tg). Glass transition is a kinetically trapped non-equilibrium phenomenon and at temperatures above the glass transition range they have sufficient kinetic energy to move enhancing the mobility of chains in amorphous regions . The bond rotations and segmental motion associated with temperature above glass transition are responsible for the rubbery state of polymers .the energy associated with these phenomena is the activation energy.once the activation energy barrier is crossed the polymer chains are free to move. relationship between storage modulus and temperature. storage modulus Vs Temperature 1.2 f=30 0.8 f=50 0.6 f=20 f= 10 0.4 f= 15 f=5 0.2 f=3 f=2 0 -78.670166 -72.556816 -65.86232 -61.962753 -58.532787 -55.570564 -53.655613 -52.556305 -50.934338 -50.008686 -48.967857 -48.274677 -46.766956 -44.499016 -42.399815 -40.59029 -38.779922 -36.561817 -34.343792 -30.668474 -27.169353 -23.146387 -18.367353 -13.996313 -10.673899 -6.362862 -2.2854843 storage modulus 1 temperature (C) Figure 7 . Plot of cos(δ) Vs Temperature f= 1 11 relationship between loss modulus and temperature. Loss modulus Vs Temperature 0.8 0.7 f= 50 Hz 0.5 f=30 Hz 0.4 f=20 Hz 0.3 f=15 Hz f=5 Hz 0.2 f= 10 Hz 0.1 f= 3 Hz 0 -78.670166 -72.556816 -65.86232 -61.962753 -58.532787 -55.570564 -53.655613 -52.556305 -50.934338 -50.008686 -48.967857 -48.274677 -46.766956 -44.499016 -42.399815 -40.59029 -38.779922 -36.561817 -34.343792 -30.668474 -27.169353 -23.146387 -18.367353 -13.996313 -10.673899 -6.362862 -2.2854843 Loss modulus 0.6 f=2 Hz f=1 Hz Temperature (C) Figure 8 . Plot of sin(δ) Vs Temperature Use of Tan δ to represent Tg Tan δ represents the ratio of the viscous to elastic response of a viscoelastic material or in another word the energy dissipation potential of a material. To make it simple, assume that one applies a load to a polymer, some part of the applied load is dissipated by the energy dissipation mechanisms (such as polymer chain segmental motion) in the bulk of polymer, and other part of the load is stored in the material that will be release upon removal of the load (such as the elastic response of a spring). Tanδ also relates to vibration damping. For vibration damping (or energy dissipation) you need high tanδ. Tanδ can provide information on the overall flexibility and the interactions between the components of a composite material. The height and area under the tanδ curve give an indication of the total amount of energy that can be absorbed by a material. A large area under the tanδ curve indicates a great degree of molecular mobility, which translates into better damping properties, meaning that the material can better absorb and dissipate energy better. So, for the design of a material that can absorb impact better, we like to increase the area under the tanδ curve. 12 Increasing tanδ indicates that material has more energy dissipation potential so the greater the tanδ, the more dissipative the material is. On the other hand, decreasing tanδ means that material acts more elastic now and by applying a load, it has more potential to store the load rather than dissipatin g it. For example, in case of nano-composites (and filled polymers), increasing the nano-particle content diminishes the value of tanδ as nano-particles impose restrictions against molecular motion of polymer chains (due to the adsorption of polymer chain on the surface of the particles) resulting in more elastic response of the material. Since the measurement of glass transition temperature from the maximum loss factor is fairly easy than measuring the glass transition temperature from loss modulus (which requires construction of tangents and determining their intersection point) it is favorable to determine glass transition temperature from the maximum loss factor. Also, Glass transition temperature can also be described using: 1. Onset of the drop in storage modulus(E') 2. peak in loss modulus (E") From the plots it can be seen that the drop in storage modulus and peak in loss modulus also occur at approximately the same temperature at which the peak in the tan delta vs temperature curve is observed. Effect of frequency on glass transition temperature The Tg value for epoxy resins based on the tanδ peak is significantly influenced by the test frequency. When characterizing a material by DMA, the time of the deformation is related to the frequency as frequency is the inverse of time (frequency = 1/time). Therefore, high frequencies are analogous to short times and low frequencies to long times.The glass transition is a molecular relaxation that involves segmental motion whose rate will depend on temperature. Therefore, as the frequency of the test increases, the molecular relaxations can only occur at higher temperatures and Consequently , the Tg increases with increasing frequency. 13 CONCLUSION In the experiment, temperature was ramped from -80°CC to 0°C at a rate of 2°C/min. The frequencies used to explore the thermal characteristics were 1, 2, 3, 5 10, 15, 20, 30 and 50 Hz.The temperature at which tan (δ) showed a maximum was interpreted as the glass transition temperature (Tg).It was observed that Tg increases with increase in test frequency. Using the Arrhenius relation, the activation energy was calculated and was observed to be 167386 J. Also,Data for the storage (E’) and loss (E’’) modulus as well as tan (δ) was reported in graphical form as a function of temperature, T. The temperature at which tan (δ) showed a maximum was interpreted as the glass transition temperature (Tg). REFERENCES 1. E. Turi, ed.,Thermal Characterization of Polymeric Materials, Academic Press,Boston, Mass., 1981; 2. H. Barnes, J. Hutton, and K. Walters,An Introduction to Rheology, Elsevier SciencePublishing, Co., New York, 1989 3. G. Martin, A. Tungare, and J. Gotro,Polymer Characterization, ACS, WashingtonD. C., 1990 4.S. Rosen,Fundamantal Principles of Polymeric Materials, Wiley Interscience, NewYork, 1993, pp. 53–77 and 258–259. 5. E. Turi, ed., Thermal Analysis in Polymer Characterization, Heydon, London, 1981.