Journal of Surgical Oncology Surgical Anatomy of Vascularized Submental Lymph Node Flap: Shared Vascular Contribution of Submental Artery with Facial Artery and Topographic Relationship with Anterior Belly of Digastric Muscle Fo Journal: Journal of Surgical Oncology Manuscript ID Draft rP Wiley - Manuscript type: Research Article Date Submitted by the n/a Author: ee Key Words: iew ev rR Complete List of Authors: Piyaman, Parkpoom; Department Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Patchanee, Krittayot; Department Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Oonjitti, Thanaphorn; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Ratanalekha, Rosarin; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Yodrabum, Nutcha; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Submental lymph node, Submandibular lymph node, Vascularized lymph node transplantation, Lymphedema John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 1 of 27 1 Surgical Anatomy of Vascularized Submental Lymph Node Flap: Shared Vascular Contribution of Submental Artery with Facial Artery and Topographic Relationship with Anterior Belly of Digastric Muscle Parkpoom Piyaman, MD1, Krittayot Patchanee, MD1, Thanaphorn Oonjitti, MD1, Rosarin Ratanalekha, MD1, Nutcha Yodrabum MD2* 1 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University 2 Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Fo Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University rP * Corresponding author: Nutcha Yodrabum ee Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University rR 2, Wanglang Road, Bangkok Noi District, Bangkok, Thailand, 10700, 66 2 419 8002 Email: n.yodrabum@gmail.com iew ev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology Presented at the 8th World Symposium for Lymphedema Surgery, April 2016, Taipei, Taiwan Running head: VSLN flap facial artery digastric muscle Synopsis: Forty vascularized submental lymph node flaps were dissected from 23 cadavers. Facial artery contributed significantly arterial supply to the lymph nodes in the area. Keywords: Submental lymph node, submandibular lymph node, perforator, vascularized lymph node transplantation, Lymphedema, Histology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 2 Abstract Background and objectives: Contribution of facial artery in vascularized submental lymph node (VSLN) flap was neglected and relationship with the anterior belly of digastric muscle (ABDM) was elusive. This study aimed to elaborate anatomy of the lymph node in aspects of arterial supply and relationship with ABDM. Methods: 40 VSLN flaps were harvested from 23 cadavers. The lymph nodes and arterial supply were studied macroscopically and under microscopy. The nodes were classified by arterial supplies, location along longitudinal axis and relationship with ABDM. Fo Results: VSLN flap had 4.4 ±1.9 lymph nodes by average predominantly located in posterior three-quarter. Submandibular nodes supplied by facial artery were 1.2 ± 0.9 by average rP dominating in posterior quarter. Half of submental perforators were originated deep to ee ABDM and extended to the nodes in every zones. Lateral to ABDM located the most surgically accessible submental nodes. Nevertheless, their arterial supply sometimes came rR from the perforators located deep to ABDM. Only 1.2 ±1.1 submental nodes per flap remained free from ABDM. ev Conclusion: Flap could be reduced to posterior three-quarter of original due to node iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 2 of 27 concentration. Facial artery should be harvested to obtain submandibular nodes. ABDM should be sacrificed due to intimate relationship with arterial supply to submental nodes. Introduction Vascularized lymph node transplantation (VLNT) is becoming mainstream surgical treatment for chronic lymphedema beside lymphovenular anastomosis (LVA). Despite much complicated procedures, advantage of VLNT over LVA was demonstrated in clinical outcomes among advanced stage lymphedema [1]. Varieties of donor sites have been John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 3 of 27 3 proposed [2]. The key principle is a direct correlation between the number of transferred lymph nodes and the improvement on lymphatic function [3]. Focusing on lower extremity lymphedema, submental flap was advantageous according to higher number of lymph nodes followed by groin and supraclavicular flap [4]. Vascularized submental lymph node flap is harvested from cervical zone Ia and Ib. The surgery collects lymph nodes, the submental artery as major donor artery, and venous tributaries to secure viability of the nodes. Comprehensive anatomical studies were Fo conducted on number and distribution of lymph nodes [5, 6, 7]. Although histology remains gold standard for lymph node identification, the only histological study was conducted in rP small group of 6 specimens from 3 cadavers [7]. Other modalities included visualization ee during dissection [6], ultrasonography [5, 6] and MR imaging [5]. Despite of the difference in modalities, the studies show similar trend about concentration of lymph nodes in posterior rR part of flap [5, 6] or around submandibular glands [5]. The evidences should have realized a ev smaller flap design that reduced conventional flap area to posterior half. Nevertheless, surgical dilemmas remain unsolved: firstly, whether or not to include the facial artery in the iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology flap. The inclusion of the artery was previously considered only by intended pedicle length since the artery had been convenient resource for pedicle extension. Nevertheless, the facial artery also supplies lymph nodes located in flap area; the submandibular group. Previous studies focused on identification of submental lymph nodes [6, 7], hence number of submandibular lymph nodes is still elusive. True number, if appears substantial, may worth sacrifice of facial artery that benefits in increasing number of the lymph nodes and mobility of the flap. Secondly, majority of the submental artery run deep to the anterior belly of digastric muscles [8]. How submental perforators supply lymph nodes located superficially to the muscles has come to question. According to previous study [9], one may imply that the John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 4 perforators penetrate the muscles to supply the superficial nodes. New insight into topographic relationship between muscle and arteries should resolve whether or not to sacrifice digastric muscles for viability of the lymph nodes. Materials and methods Forty vascularized submental lymph node flaps were obtained from 23 fresh cadavers. The cadavers were self-donated by living will to Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Fo Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Based on donation records, cadavers were Thai nationality, 10 males and 13 females in the age range of 56-76 years. Exclusion criteria were rP 1) visible cranial and cervical deformity. 2) medical history of lymphatic diseases involved ee head and neck. 3) visible surgical wound to cervical zone Ia and Ib if the cadavers were subjected to other medical training or research prior to our study. The procedure was rR approved by Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SiRB) with protocol number 366/2561(Exempt). iew ev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 4 of 27 To visualize the vessels, external carotid arteries of both sides were cannulated, irrigated with 0.9% saline solution and injected with red polyacrylamide solution [10]. The solution was produced in two parts. For part A, forty milliliters of 40% acrylamide gel (19:1) was mixed with 40 ml of acrylic color (Daler-Rowney, England). For part B, 80 µm of tetramethylehylenediamine (TEMED) are mixed with 0.8 ml of 10% ammonium persulphate. Then, part A and B were mixed immediately before injection. The solution is injected 80 ml per vessel, 160 ml per head. After injection, the specimens were left in 25°c environment for an hour until the polymerization was completed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 5 of 27 5 Dissection of vascularized submental lymph node flap was adapted from previous study [6]. Flap design was elliptical skin paddle where longitudinal axis ran from mental protuberance (gnathion) to angle of mandible (gonion). Medial curve was demarcated roughly by both bellies of digastric muscle, while lateral curve by inferior mandibular border. Then, 3 imaginary lines were drawn perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis dividing flap into 4 quarters (Q1 ~ Q4) from anterior to posterior end (gnathion to gonion) (Fig. 1a). The flaps were approached laterally to include the anterior belly of digastric muscles, entire submental artery, a segment of facial artery from its origin to mandibular border, and part of Fo submandibular gland (Fig. 1b). The superficial lobe of the gland was cut partially. In some case whereas the gland was not overlapped with other crucial structures it was preserved with the body. ee rP We adapted measurements from previous study [6] to produce comparable results. rR Measurements included a) length of inferior mandibular border from gnathion to gonion, b) ev lengths and diameters of the facial and the submental artery and c) mandibular projection (MP) defined as a location of the structures projected on mandibular border. The projection iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology was also represented in percentage of total length of mandibular border. (Fig. 2a). Additionally, size and distribution of the lymph nodes were recorded then classified by blood supply, quarter, and zone. For blood supply, the nodes were classified into submandibular group supplied by facial artery and submental group supplied by submental arteries. For quarter, the nodes were classified by position along longitudinal axis of the flap into Q1 ~ Q4 (Fig. 1, 2a). For zone, the nodes were classified by relationship with ABDM into medial, superficial, deep and lateral zones (Fig. 2b). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 6 Once removed, flaps were hardened in 10% formalin then sliced by 2-mm thickness. The lymph nodes were recounted under stereo microscopy. The slices of flap were subjected to serial microscopic section for final structural identification and topography. To achieve precise relationship, the specimens were carefully oriented from dissection histological process whereas dermis on each slice was conserved as the superficial demarcation (Fig. 1). Result The arteries Fo The facial artery was measured 68.6 ±19.9 mm in length from origin to crossing point (Table I). Along its course, the artery branched off the submental artery at 44.6 ±16.5 mm from the rP origin, which located 77.0 ±9.0% of mandibular projection. The facial artery crossed inferior ee mandibular border at 74.6 ±6.8%. Its diameter was gradually decreased from 3.9 ±0.7 mm at origin to 3.4 ±0.8 mm at submental branch and 2.8 ±0.7 mm at mandibular border. rR The submental artery ran toward gnathion for 63.9 ±12.0 mm on average. Posterior ev (proximal) part of the artery was obscured by superficial lobe of submandibular gland. The separation between the two was challenged by vascular connection formed by multiples iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 6 of 27 glandular branches from facial and submental arteries. Each glandular branch was carefully distinguished from perforators supplying lymph nodes. The former was cut adjacent to the gland whereas the latter were kept entirely as lymph node pedicles. Distal part of submental artery arose from the gland then traversed and superimposed with anterior belly of digastric muscle (ABDM). Majority of them, 33 branches (82.5%), lied deep to the muscle defined as deep type and the rest lied superficially defined as superficial type (Fig 3). The submental artery usually enveloped ABDM, one side by the artery itself and another side by its branches originated just before the artery superimposed by the muscle. The envelopment complicated typing of submental arteries that eventually resolved by microscopic examination in some John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 7 of 27 7 case. Each submental artery branched off 2 to 6 perforators, 3.8 in average (Table II). The study counted 153 submental perforators. Their mandibular projections ranged from 60.9% to 21.7%, beyond posterior border of ABDM. Only 124 branches (81.0%) was confirmed under microscopy to supply lymph nodes. Half of those, 61 branches (49.6%), were originated deep to ABDM (Table III). They extended beyond deep zone to supplied the nodes in medial, superficial and lateral zones. Some of them perforated through ABDM from deep zone to the Fo nodes in superficial zone (Fig.3). The rests of perforators were originated in lateral (36.6%), superficial (9.8%) and medial zone (4.1%). The perforators supplying submandibular nodes rP had significantly larger diameter comparing to those supplying submental nodes, 0.59 ±0.22 ee mm versus 0.47 ±0.18 mm (Table IV). The lymph nodes ev rR Serial tracing under microscopy identified 174 lymph nodes from 40 flaps. The number was comprised of 124 nodes (71.3%) from submental group, 48 nodes (38.7%) from iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology submandibular group and 2 nodes (2.1%) remained unidentifiable (Table V). Average number per flap was 4.4 ± 1.9 nodes. Of these, 3.1 ± 1.7 nodes were submental group and 1.2 ± 0.9 nodes were submandibular group (Table VI). Submandibular group has a significantly larger size than submental group, 5.6 ±2.5 mm versus 3.9 ±1.7 mm (Table IV). Classified by quarter from Q1 ~ Q4, the nodes were distributed 9.2%, 24.1%, 28.2%, and 38.5%, respectively (Table V). Submandibular group was concentrated in Q4 accounted for 93.8% (45 in 48) of submandibular group. In this area, the group also predominated over submental group and contributed 67.1% (45 of 67 nodes) of all nodes in Q4. The group were superimposed by submandibular gland occupying much of Q3 ~ Q4. The glands nevertheless John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 8 were well-encapsulated and appeared surgically separable from superimposed nodes. Submental group, 124 nodes, was distributed in every quarters 13.1%, 34.4%, 37.1% and 16.4% from Q1 ~ Q4, respectively (Table V). They were subdivided by ABDM into 68 nodes (54.8%) in lateral zone (Table III). The rests: 31 nodes (25.0%) in superficial, 13 nodes (10.5%) in deep and 12 nodes (9.7%) in medial zone. All of 13 deep nodes were coincided with deep type submental artery (Fig. 3b, 3d). The lateral nodes were the most visually distinct during lateral surgical approach. However, their arterial supplies were not always Fo distinct as well since they were not confined in lateral zone. Twenty of 68 lateral nodes were supplied by perforators from the deep zone. As a result, only 46 nodes, (37.1%) of all rP submental nodes were definitely “free” from ABDM (labelled as LF in Fig. 3, 4). The free ee submental node was found inconsistently, 1.2 ± 1.1 by average. The fascia investing over ABDM were thinner than capsule investing submandibular gland. The deep lymph nodes and rR deep perforators appeared very close to the fascia. Superficial group, on the other hand, ev showed varied proximity to ABDM due to amount of subcutaneous fat (Fig. 4d, 4e). Discussion iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 8 of 27 Reliable lymph node identification Previous MRI study [5] excluded lymph nodes smaller than 1.0 mm from the study due to limitation of MRI resolution. Our study revealed that all of lymph node in this area were larger than 1.0 mm, hence supporting validity of previous MRI data. However, their average number of lymph node per flap; 7.2 ± 2.4, were significantly higher than ours; 4.4 ± 1.9, counted from microscopic serial section. Such difference could be attributed partly to our harvest process under unaided eyes. The harvest may miss some of submandibular lymph John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 9 of 27 9 nodes that located deep in subcutaneous tissue near the origin of facial artery. On the other hand, MRI study did not verify the source of blood supply of each lymph node and virtual demarcation of flap area by software appeared indefinite. MRI-based counting might unintentionally include lymph node other than submental and submandibular groups. Focusing on submental group alone, average numbers in each flap were consistent across studies, 2.9 ± 1.5 by our study, 3.0 ±0.6 [6] and 3.3 ±1.5 [7]. Hence, the actual number of submandibular group remains debatable. Fo The optimal area for vascularized submental lymph node flap Recent study [5] showed that lymph nodes, disregarded of their arterial supply, were rP concentrated in central quarter (Q2 ~ Q3) comprising 61% of all nodes. Our study located ee 52.3% (Table V); 2.3 ± 1.4 nodes by average in the same area (Table VI). We also showed that harvesting Q3 and Q4 (posterior half) would obtain about two-third of all nodes, 2.9 ± rR 1.4 by average whereas harvesting Q2 to Q4 (posterior three quarters) would obtain most of ev the nodes. Asuncion et al. [5] also showed close relationship between lymph nodes and submandibular gland implying the latter as optimal landmark for harvest area. It is iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology noteworthy that large proportion of the Q4 lymph nodes superimposed by the gland were submandibular group, 67.1% of Q4 nodes (Table V). Decision to harvest Q4 nodes therefore should include facial artery for viability of submandibular group. Lymph node perforators that superimposed by the gland should be differentiated carefully from glandular branches, 1.5 branches by average [11]. On the other hand, inclusion of the facial artery would increase pedicle length by 44.6 16.5 mm (Table I). A patient who cannot afford to sacrifice the facial artery should avoid Q4 due to large contribution of facial artery to the area. The harvest of Q2 ~ Q3 or Q1 ~ Q3 should obtain 2.2 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 10 ±1.4 or 2.6 ±1.5 submental nodes, respectively with neglectable number of submandibular group. The dilemma to sacrifice anterior belly of digastric muscle (ABDM) ABDM is usually sacrificed during harvest of submental lymph node flap especially when it obscured the submental arteries that, according to our data, would occur 82.5% of the cases. The number are very close to Magden et al. [8] at 81%, but slightly different from Faltaous et al. [9] at 70%. Previous study [6] showed mandibular projection of anteriormost submental Fo perforators at 41%. They concluded that submental perforators were limited anteriorly by posterior (lateral) border of ABDM. Hence surgical exploration beyond posterior border of rP ABDM to gain more viable lymph node seem futile. Our data nevertheless showed a slightly ee more anterior version of mandibular projection of submental perforator. Vascular injection and serial sectioning revealed that anteriormost submental perforators extended beyond rR posterior border of ABDM up to 21.5% of mandibular projection. Some perforated through ev ABDM from its deep zone to supply submental lymph nodes located superficial to the muscle. iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 10 of 27 Ramification of the submental artery diminished the possibility to preserve ABDM as it would compromise lymph node’s arterial supply related to the muscle. Firstly, a plan to preserve ABDM in case of superficial type submental artery seems futile because the typing of the artery would be difficult by conventional surgical procedures. According to our study, major artery had only slightly larger diameter than its branches so that the typing had to be resolved by total exposure of ABDM or microscopic sections. Secondly, Number of lymph node in deep zone might be trivial, 10.6% of submental group, but the deep zone harbored much of perforators supplying the node in every zones. Definitely free submental nodes; non- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 11 of 27 11 overlapped node and perforators, was reduced and found inconsistently in the flap. Nonetheless, the attempt to separate the perforators from the muscle required great cares. Muscular fascia investing ABDM was thinner than submandibular gland capsule. Limitation of the study Our methods were insufficient to resolve two issues: firstly, debatable number of submandibular lymph nodes that might be a result of inadequate dissection. Secondly, potential collateral or coalescent arterial supply to a lymph node. Our dissection simulated Fo actual flap harvest that limited exploration on ipsi- and contralateral arterial supply to the nodes. We suggest “en bloc” approach in further study harvesting both sides of cervical zone rP Ia Ib simultaneously with part of mandible. The approach should preserve topographical ee accuracy of all structures, especially submandibular gland that usually disoriented during dissection processes. ev Conclusion rR Lymph nodes were concentrated in posterior three quarter of the flap; therefore, harvest area iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology could be reduced accordingly. Facial artery had significant contribution supplying lymph nodes in posterior quarter of the flap. Sacrifice of facial artery would benefit both in viability of the nodes and increasing mobility of the flap. Alternatively, submental-only design should select central quarters or anterior three quarter of the flap predominated by the submental lymph nodes. ABDM should be sacrificed to secure arterial supply of the submental nodes due to intimate relationship of the perforator supplying the node with the muscles. Acknowledgment John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 12 For dissection part, we wish to thank Suphalerk Lohasammakul, Warit Chongkolwatana, Phattarapong Predapramote and Kittipich Sangkamard, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University for their excellent surgical skill. For microscopy part, we wish to thank all staffs in Microtechnique Unit, Department of Anatomy for painstaking production of serial microscopic sections and Chanagun Tounkhrua for industrious tracing and identification of all lymph nodes. iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 12 of 27 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 13 of 27 1 Abbreviation list VSLN flap, vascularized submental lymph node flap VLNT, vascularized lymph node transplantation LVA, lymphovenular anastomosis ABDM, anterior belly of digastric muscle SMG, submandibular gland Q, quarter MP, mandibular projection iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 1 References 1. Akita S, Mitsukawa N, Kuriyama M, et al: Comparison of vascularized supraclavicular lymph node transfer and lymphaticovenular anastomosis for advanced stage lower extremity lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg 74:573-9, 2015 2. Ozturk CN, Ozturk C, Glasgow M, et al: Free vascularized lymph node transfer for treatment of lymphedema: A systematic evidence-based review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:123447, 2016 Fo 3. Nguyen DH, Chou PY, Hsieh YH, et al: Quantity of lymph nodes correlates with rP improvement in lymphatic drainage in treatment of hind limb lymphedema with lymph node ee flap transfer in rats. Microsurgery 36:239-45, 2016 rR 4. Patel KM, Chu SY, Huang JJ, et al: Preplanning vascularized lymph node transfer with ev duplex ultrasonography: an evaluation of 3 donor sites. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2:e193, 2014 iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 14 of 27 5. Asuncion MO, Chu SY, Huang YL, et al: Accurate Prediction of Submental Lymph Nodes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymphedema Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6:e1691, 2018 6. Tzou CH, Meng S, Ines T, et al: Surgical anatomy of the vascularized submental lymph node flap: Anatomic study of correlation of submental artery perforators and quantity of submental lymph node. J Surg Oncol 115:54-59, 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 15 of 27 2 7. Cheng MH, Huang JJ, Nguyen DH, et al: A novel approach to the treatment of lower extremity lymphedema by transferring a vascularized submental lymph node flap to the ankle. Gynecol Oncol 126:93-8, 2012 8. Magden O, Edizer M, Tayfur V, et al: Anatomic Study of the Vasculature of the Submental Artery Flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 114:1719-1723, 2004 9. Faltaous Adel A YRJ: The Submental Artery Flap: An Anatomic Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:56-60, 1996 rP Fo 10. Lohasammakul S, Turbpaiboon C, Chompoopong S, et al: Vascular Nature and Existence ee of Anastomoses of Extrinsic Postauricular Fascia: Application for Staged Auricular Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 78:723-727, 2017 ev rR 11. Li L, Gao X-l, Song Y-z, et al: Anatomy of arteries and veins of submandibular glands. Chinese Medical Journal 120:1179-82, 2007 iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology 1 Figure legends Fig. 1. Photographs show 4 steps of study method. (a) The flap area was drawn from gnathion to gonion demarcating mandibular and medial borders. Then 3 perpendicular lines were drawn to divided the flap into 4 quarters, Q1 ~ Q4. (b) The flap was harvested by lateral approach. The anterior belly of digastric muscle was cut from mandible and reflected. (c) Once removed, the flap was dissected further to expose the facial artery (FA), the submental artery (SA), perforators (P) and lymph nodes (L). Then the flap was fixed with 10% formalin. (d) The entire flap was sliced at 2-mm thick and subjected to histological Fo processes. Mylohyoid (MH), submandibular gland (SMG), anterior belly of digastric muscle (DM). ee rP Fig. 2. (a) Inferior view diagram shows measurements of the facial artery; the length from its origin to the origin of the submental artery (FL1), the length from the origin of the submental rR artery to mandibular border (FL2), the diameter at origin (F1), the diameter at the origin of ev the submental artery (F2), and the diameter at the crossing point over mandibular border (F3). The submental artery was measured for total length (SL) and diameter at the origin iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 16 of 27 (S1). The positions relative to mandibular border (mandibular projection, MP) were measured at F3, S1, location of the lymph nodes and the perforators. The percentage of mandibular projection (MP%) are approximately coincided with Q1 ~ Q4 at 0~25%, 25~50% 50~75% and 75~100%, respectively. (b) Coronal section diagram shows zoning of the flap by anterior belly of digastric muscles (DM) medial (M), superficial (S), deep (D) and lateral (L) zones. Submandibular gland (SMG). Fig. 3. Diagrams of the submental artery (SA) comparing between the superficial (a, c) and the deep type (b, d) in aspect of distribution of the submental perforators and submental John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 17 of 27 2 lymph nodes. The superficial type submental artery harbors the submental nodes in 3 zones relative to anterior belly of digastric muscle (DM); medial (M), superficial (S) and lateral (L) but not in deep zone (D). The latter was only found in the deep type submental artery. The deep perforators of the deep artery (b, d) are either circumvent or perforate the muscle to supply the superficial node located on the opposite side. Free lateral node (LF) is located where related perforator is also not overlapped with the muscle. Facial artery (FA), submandibular gland (SMG), hyoid bone (H), mylohyoid muscle (MH), platysma (PL). Fo Fig. 4. Micrographs show variations in topographical relationship between the submental lymph nodes and the perforator supplying them. (a) Free lateral node (LF) is located where rP both node and entire perforator (arrowhead) are lateral to the anterior belly of digastric ee muscle (DM). (b) Lateral node (L) is supplied by perforator originated deep to the muscle. (c, e) Deep perforators circumvent the muscle to supply medial (M) and superficial nodes (S). rR (d) Deep perforator perforates the muscle to supply superficial node (S). (f) Perforator and ev the node are both in deep zone. Perforator (arrowhead), platysma (PL), mylohyoid (MH). iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology Table I. Characteristics of the Mandible, the Facial Artery and the Submental Artery Length (mm) Facial artery Diameter (mm) FL1 + FL2: 68.6 19.9 F1: 3.9 0.7 FL1: 44.6 16.5 F2: 3.4 0.8 FL2: 25.9 8.2 F3: 2.8 0.7 SL: 63.9 12.0 S1: 2.4 0.7 Submental artery The data are represented by mean standard deviation FL1, the length of the facial artery from its origin to the origin of the submental artery FL2, the length of the facial artery from the origin of the submental artery to mandibular border Fo F1, the diameter of the facial artery at origin rP F2, the diameter of the facial artery at the origin of the submental artery F3, the diameter of the facial artery at the crossing point over mandibular border ee SL, the total length of the submental artery S1, diameter of the submental artery at the origin iew ev rR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 18 of 27 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 19 of 27 Table II. Mandibular Projection of the Facial Artery, the Submental Artery and Submental Perforators Mandibular projection Inferior mandibular border mm % 98.8 6.1 100 (gnathion to gonion) Facial artery At F3 (n = 40) 74.6 6.8 75.6 6.6 Submental artery At S1 (n = 40) 77.0 9.0 78.2 9.3 1st (n = 40) 59.8 9.1 60.9 10.4 2nd (n = 38) 50.5 9.6 51.4 10.4 3rd (n = 35) 40.0 11.3 40.6 11.9 4th (n = 19) 34.0 9.6 34.5 10.4 5th (n = 14) 28.6 8.9 29.0 8.4 6th 21.5 5.3 21.7 4.7 Submental perforator rP Fo (n = 7) ee The data are represented by mean standard deviation rR At F3, at the crossing point over mandibular border At S1, at origin of the submental artery iew ev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology Table III. Zoning of Submental Perforators supplying the lymph nodes and the Submental Lymph Nodes According to Relationship with Anterior Belly of Digastric Muscles (ABDM) Zoning by ABDM (count, %) The perforators supplying the submental nodes (n = 124) Submental nodes (n = 124) Medial Deep Superficial Lateral 5 (4.1%) 61 (49.6%) 12 (9.8%) 45 (36.6%) 12 (9.8%) 13 (10.6%) 31 (25.2%) 67 (54.5%) iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 20 of 27 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 21 of 27 Table IV. Comparisons Between Submandibular Lymph Nodes and Submental Lymph Nodes in Terms of Node’s Size and Diameter of The Perforator Supplying Them All nodes (n = 174) Submandibular nodes (n = 48) Submental nodes (n = 124) Lymph nodes size (mm) 4.4 2.2 5.6 2.5 3.9 1.9 0.00005 Perforators diameter (mm) 0.50 0.20 0.59 0.22 0.47 0.18 0.00670 Value are in mm, represented by mean standard deviation iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. P value (P < 0.05, 2-tailed) Journal of Surgical Oncology Table V. Distribution of the Lymph Nodes by Quarter (Q) Lymph node count (nodes, %) All Submandibular Submental 2 (n = 174) (n = 48) (n = 124) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 16 42 49 67 (9.2%) (24.1%) (28.2%) (38.5%) 0 0 3 45 (0%) (0%) (6.3%) (93.8%) 16 42 46 20 (13.1%) (34.4%) (37.1%) (16.4%) lymph nodes were unclassifiable. iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Page 22 of 27 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 23 of 27 Table VI. Average number of the Lymph Nodes by Quarter (Q) Lymph node by average All Q All Submandibular Submental 2 Q1 ~ Q3 Q2 ~ Q3 Q3 ~ Q4 (central quarters) (posterior half) (n = 174) 4.4 1.9 2.7 1.5 2.3 1.4 2.9 1.4 (n = 48) 1.2 0.9 - - 1.2 0.9 (n = 124) 3.1 1.7 2.6 1.5 2.2 1.4 1.7 1.3 lymph nodes were unclassifiable Average is represented by mean standard deviation neglectable numbers iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Fig. 1. Photographs show 4 steps of study method. (a) The flap area was drawn from gnathion to gonion demarcating mandibular and medial borders. Then 3 perpendicular lines were drawn to divided the flap into 4 quarters, Q1 ~ Q4. (b) The flap was harvested by lateral approach. The anterior belly of digastric muscle was cut from mandible and reflected. (c) Once removed, the flap was dissected further to expose the facial artery (FA), the submental artery (SA), perforators (P) and lymph nodes (L). Then the flap was fixed with 10% formalin. (d) The entire flap was sliced at 2-mm thick and subjected to histological processes. Mylohyoid (MH), submandibular gland (SMG), anterior belly of digastric muscle (DM). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 24 of 27 Page 25 of 27 iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology Fig. 2. (a) Inferior view diagram shows measurements of the facial artery; the length from its origin to the origin of the submental artery (FL1), the length from the origin of the submental artery to mandibular border (FL2), the diameter at origin (FΦ1), the diameter at the origin of the submental artery (FΦ2), and the diameter at the crossing point over mandibular border (FΦ3). The submental artery was measured for total length (SL) and diameter at the origin (SΦ1). The positions relative to mandibular border (mandibular projection, MP) were measured at FΦ3, SΦ1, location of the lymph nodes and the perforators. The percentage of mandibular projections (MP%) are approximately coincided with Q1 ~ Q4 at 0~25%, 25~50% 50~75% and 75~100%, respectively. (b) Coronal section diagram shows zoning of the flap by anterior belly of digastric muscles (DM) medial (M), superficial (S), deep (D) and lateral (L) zones. Submandibular gland (SMG). 80x160mm (600 x 600 DPI) John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 26 of 27 Page 27 of 27 ev rR ee rP Fo Fig. 3. Diagrams of the submental artery (SA) comparing between the superficial (a, c) and the deep type (b, d) in aspect of distribution of the submental perforators and submental lymph nodes. The superficial type submental artery harbors the submental nodes in 3 zones relative to anterior belly of digastric muscle (DM); medial (M), superficial (S) and lateral (L) but not in deep zone (D). The latter was only found in the deep type submental artery. The deep perforators of the deep artery (b, d) are either circumvent or perforate the muscle to supply the superficial node located on the opposite side. Free lateral node (LF) is located where related perforator is also not overlapped with the muscle. Facial artery (FA), submandibular gland (SMG), hyoid bone (H), mylohyoid muscle (MH), platysma (PL). iew 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Journal of Surgical Oncology 133x118mm (600 x 600 DPI) John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Surgical Oncology iew ev rR ee rP Fo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Fig. 4. Micrographs show variations in topographical relationship between the submental lymph nodes and the perforator supplying them. (a) Free lateral node (LF) is located where both node and entire perforator (arrowhead) are lateral to the anterior belly of digastric muscle (DM). (b) Lateral node (L) is supplied by perforator originated deep to the muscle. (c, e) Deep perforators circumvent the muscle to supply medial (M) and superficial nodes (S). (d) Deep perforator perforates the muscle to supply superficial node (S). (f) Perforator and the node are both in deep zone. Perforator (arrowhead), platysma (PL), mylohyoid (MH). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Page 28 of 27