International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) International Open Access Journal ISSN No: 2456 - 6470 | www.ijtsrd.com | Volume - 2 | Issue – 1 Analyzation of Weak Convergence on L^p Space R. Ranjitha Research Scholar, Department of Mathematics, Vivekanandha College of Arts and Sciences for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamilnadu, India S. Dickson Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Vivekanandha College for Women, Tiruchengode, Tami Tamilnadu, India ABSTRACT In this paper a study on duality, weak convergences and weak sequential compactness on 𝐿 space. A new generalized 𝐿 space is investigated from the weak sequential convergence. Some more special types and properties of 𝐿 are presented. Few relevant examples are also included to justify the proposed notions. Keywords: Dual space, Linear functional, Weak Convergence, Compact 1. INTRODUCTION The Lp spaces were introduced by FrigyesRiesz [9] as part of a program to formulate for functional and mappings defined on infinite dimensional spaces appropriate versions of properties possessed by functionals and mappings ings defined on finite dimensional spaces. In this paper, we study the weak convergence and weak compactness on the so-called called Lebe Lebesgue spaces (or Lp – spaces as they are usually called). 2. PRELIMINARIES J. Ravi Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Vivekanandha College for Women, Tiruchengode, Tamilnadu, India Definition 2.2 Let X be a linear space and let f X . The norm of f is denoted f by f and it is defined as, f, f. Definition 2.3 Let X be a linear space. A real-valued real functional‖ . ‖on X is called a norm provided for each f and g in X and each real number , f 0 and f 0 if and only if f 0 , i) f g f g , ii) iii) f f .By a normed linear space we mean a linear space together with a norm. Definition 2.4 Let f : X R be a measurable function on a measure space X , A, . The essential supremem of f on X is ess sup f = inf{𝑎 ∈ ℝ: ℝ 𝜇[𝑥𝜖𝑋: 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝑎] = 0}. X Definition 2.1 Let X be a measure space. The measurable function fis said to be in Lp if it is p-integrable, integrable, that is, if Equivalently, ess sup f inf sup g : g f po int wisea.e. Thus, the essential supremum of a function depends only on its -a.e. a.e. equivalence class. f f p Lp d . The Lp f p d 1/ p norm of f is defined by X X @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec Dec 2017 Page: 1142 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 Definition 2.4 Let X , A, be a measure space. The space L X consists of point wise a.e.- equivalence classes of essentially bounded measurable functions f : X R with norm f L ess sup f . In future, we will write X ess sup f =sup f . Definition 2.5 If p and q are positive real numbers such that 1 1 p q pq or equivalently, 1 , p q 1 p ,1 q .Then we call p and q a pair of Young’s inequality3.1 a p bq , with equality p q occurring if and only if a p 1 b . for any a, b 0 , we have ab Holder inequality 3.2 Let 1 p , and let in the mean of order P if each f n belongs to LP and f fn p 0. 1 1 1 .If p q then fg L1 E and fg E Lemma 3.3 Let 1 p . f g p p 2p fg f If f , g L p , f p p p g q. E g p p then f g Lp . consequently, LP and is a vector space. Note: Convergence in L is nearly uniform convergence. Definition 2.7 A linear functional on a linear space X is a real-valued function T on X such that for g and h in X and 𝛼 and 𝛽 real numbers, T .g .h .T g .T h . Note: 2.8 1. The collection of linear functionals on a linear space is itself a linear space. 2. A linear functional is bounded if and only if it is continuous. Definition 2.9 Let X and Y be a normed linear spaces. An isometric isomorphism of X into Y is a one-one linear transformation f : X Y such that, f x x , q be defined by f Lp E and g Lq E conjugate exponents. Definition 2.6 A sequence of function x f n is said to converge to f 1 1 1 .Then, p q Let 1 p and let q be defined by for all x X . 3. WEAK SEQUENTIAL CONVERGENCE ON Lp SPACE Some basic inequalities and results have been discussed. Minkowski’s Inequality 3.4 Let 1 p and let f , g L p .Then, f g L p and f g p f p g p . Definition 3.5 Let X be a normed linear space. Then the collection of bounded linear functionals on X is a linear space on which ‖ . ‖∗ is a norm.This normed linear space is called the dual space of X and denoted by X * . Definition 3.6 Let X be a normed linear space. A sequence fn in X is said to converges weakly in X to f in X provided lim T n * f n T f for all T X .We write f n ⟶ f in X to mean that f and each f n belong to X and fn converges weakly in X to f. Definition 3.7 A subset K of a normed linear space X is said to be weakly sequentially compact in X provided every sequence f n in K has a subsequence that converges weakly to f K . @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1143 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 Theorem 3.8 Let E be a measurable set and 1 p . fn and f f in Lp E . Then f n is bounded in Lp E p lim inf f n p Since k . f k * Suppose . q 1 for all k , the sequence of partial 3k sums of the series . f k 1 Lq E . * k k is a Cauchy sequencein Proof: Let q be a conjugate of p and f * the conjugate function of f . We first establish the right-hand side on the above inequality. We infer from Holder’s Inequality that We know that, ‟If X is a measure space and 1 p , f Define the function g L E by g * . fn f E f . * . fn p for all n . q q E Since fn converges weakly to f and f * belongs to Lq E , n f p lim inf fn E p By contradiction to show that fn is bounded in f is unbounded. Without loss of L E . Assume p n p generality, by possibly taking scalar multiples of a subsequence, we suppose 1 f n p n.3n for all n ⇒ n f n p n forall n .⟶① 3 We inductively select a sequence of real numbers k 1 1 for each k . Define 1 . If n is a k 3 3 natural number for which 1 , 2 ,....n have been defined. Define for which k * 1 1 n 1 n 1 if k fn . fn1 0 and n 1 n 1 if 3 3 E k 1 the above integral is negative. Therefore, by ① and the definition of conjugate function, n 1 n * k fk . fn n fn E 3 k 1 p n * k . fk . fn n ⟶② E k 1 and n . f n * q . f k 1 * k k . We infer from the triangle inequality, ②, and Holder’s Inequality that * k . fk . fn E g. fn E k 1 f p f *. fn lim f *. fn E Fix a natural number n . fn fn p for all n . * then Lp X is complete” [2] tells us that Lq E is complete. n * * k . fk . fn k . fk . fn E kn1 E k1 n * * k . fk . fn k . fk . fn E k1 E kn1 * n k . fk . fn E k n1 1 1 1 n k . fn p n n . . f n 3 2 k n1 3 g. f E n p n . 2 This is a contradiction because, the sequence f n converges weakly in Lp E and g belongs to Lq E . The sequence of real numbers g . f n converges and E therefore is bounded. Hence f n is bounded in Lp . Corollary 3.9 Let E be a measurable set, 1 p and q the conjugate of p . Suppose f n converges weakly to f in Lp E 1 for all n . 3n @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1144 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 gn and converges strongly to g in Lq E .Then lim gn . fn g. f n E E E g .f g. f g .f g.f g.f g.f n n n E n n E n E E gn g . fn g. fn g. f E E E n n E n E n E E n E n n E E E n n E E n E E . E E E E E E E f n E f . g 0 g f n f .g E f .g f .g n 0 E 0 E Since fn fn f p . g0 g q f n .g f .g . E E is bounded in L E and the linear span of p is dense in Lq E , there is a function g in this linear span for which . g0 g p q lim fn .g f .g . n E E Therefore, there is a natural number N for which E f .g f .g 2 if n N .It is clear that②holds for gn . fn g. f . It follows that lim n E E for all n . 2 We infer from ①, the linearity of integration, and the linearity of convergence for sequences of real numbers, that E 0 E fn f lim gn . fn g. f 0 n n E and therefore, by using Holder’s inequality, E E E E 0 E lim gn. fn g. f 0 n E f .g f .g lim gn. fn g. f C.0 g. f g. f E n E E E Substitute above inequalities in equation ① , we get n 0 E E E E lim gn g q 0and lim g. fn g. f 0 fn .g0 f .g0 fn f . g0 g fn f .g From these inequalities and the fact that both n E E n E n E E lim gn. fn g. f C.lim gn g q lim g. fn g. f ⟶① E 0 E f n f .g0 fn f .g fn f .g Taking limit on both sides, we get lim gn . fn g. f lim C. gn g q g. fn g. f n n E E E E n 0 f n .g 0 f . g 0 f n . g f .g f n . g f . g C. gn g q g. fn g.f for all n E if n N . ⟶② 0 E n n E g .f g. f E n 0 E g . f g. f g g.f g. f g. f n n E f .g f .g f .g f .g f .g f .g f .g f .g E Therefore, by Holder’s Inequality, n f .g f . g Observe that for any g Lq E and natural number n , g . f g. f g g.f g. f g. f n E must find a natural number N for which E E E lim fn .g0 f .g0 .Let 0 . We n We show that E According to the preceding theorem, there is a constant C 0 for which f n p C for all n . Consider f .g for all g 𝓕.⟶① Proof: Assume that ① holds. To verify weak convergence, let g 0 belong to Lq E . Proof: For each index n E f n .g f in Lp E if and only if lim n fn n E Proposition 3.10 Let E be a measurable set, 1 p , and q E E this choice of N .Therefore lim f n . g f . g is true n the conjugate of p .Assume𝓕 is a subset of Lq E whose E E for all g 𝓕. linear span is dense in Lq E .Let f n be a bounded sequence in Lp E and f belong to Lp E . Then @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1145 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 4. DUALITY ON Lp SPACE Theorem 4.1 Suppose that X , A, is If f Lp X , a measure space and then F g fg 1 1 p . d , defines a bounded linear functional F : Lp X R , and F f Lp* 1 Lp B . Then g L1 X with g B Let g sgn f .If X is a finite, then the same result holds for p 1 . F g f 1 Lp g Lp which implies that F is a bounded linear functional on L with F Lp* f L . In proving the reverse inequality, we may assume that f 0 (otherwise the result is trivial). First, suppose that 1 p . P p1 f Let g sgn f f Lp1 and p1 / p 1 .Then g Lp , since f Lp , g Lp 1. Also, f F g sgn f f f p1 L Since p1 p1 1 , p since 1 p 1 d f g Lp 1, we have F Lp* f F p* L 1 Lp . F g ,so that F g 1 f d f B B It follows that F L1* f 1 Lp . F Lp* is actually attained for a suitable function g . Suppose that p 1 and X is finite. For 0 , let L L . , therefore F L1* f L since 0 is arbitrary. This theorem shows that the map F J f defined by J : Lp X Lp X , * J f : g fg 1 d , Is a isometry from Lp into Lp* . Note: 4.2 The following result is that J is onto when 1 p , meaning that every bounded linear functional on LP 1 arises in this way from an Lp - function. The proof is based on that if F : Lp X R is a bounded linear functional on Lp X , then E F E defines an absolutely continuous measure on X , A, . Lemma4.3 Let X , A, be a finite measure space and 1 p . For f an integrable function over X, suppose there is an M 0 such that for every simple function g on X that vanishes outside of a set of finite measure, fg d M . g p . …(1). Then f belongs X to L X , , where q is conjugate of p . Moreover, q If p , we get the same conclusion by taking g sgn f L . Thus, in these cases the supremum defining 1, and 1 Proof: From Holder’s inequality, we have for 1 p that L1 A x X : f x f L . Then 0 A .Moreover, since X is finite, there is an increasing sequence of sets An of finite measure whose union is A such that An A . So we can find a subset B A such that 0 B . f q M . Proof: First consider the case p 1 .Since f is a non-negative measurable function and the measure space is finite, according to the Simple Approximation Theorem, there is a sequence of simple functions n , each of which vanishes outside of a set of finite measure, that converges point wise on X to f and n f on E for all n . q Since nq converges point wise on X to f . We know that,” If X , A, is a measure space and fn a sequence of non-negative measurable functions @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1146 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 on X for which fn f point wise a.e. on X and if f f is measurable. Then d lim inf X f d .” [3] Theorem 5.1 Let X be a separable normed linear space and Tn a q sequence in its dual space X * that is bounded, that is, n X The above statement tells us that to show that f is integrable and f M q it suffices to show that X Fix a natural number n. To verify (1), we estimate the functional values of nq as follows: nq n nq 1 f .nq 1 q n q 1 n X d M g n p . ….....................................(4) Since p and q are therefore g n d n p q 1 p X p q 1 q conjugate, X and d nq d X 1/ p Thus we may rewrite (4) as d M . nq d X X q n For each , n is a simple function that vanishes outside of a set of finite measure and therefore it is integrable. Thus the preceding integral inequality may be rewritten as q n 11/ p q n d X T of Tn and X* for f T f ….(2) for all f in X . nk lim Tnk k T in which Let f j j1 be a countable subset of X that is dense in X .We infer from (1) that the sequence of real numbers Tn f1 is bounded. Therefore, by the Bolzano- WeierstrassTheorem,“Every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence.” there is a strictly increasing sequence of integers s 1, n and a d f .g n d X f ……(1) Define the simple function g n by g n sgn f . on X. We infer from (1) and (2) that X M. Proof: nq f .sgn f .nq 1 on X…............................(3) q n there is an M 0 for which Tn f for all f in X and all n .Then there is subsequence q q n d M for all n…................................(2) 5. WEAK SEQUENTIAL COMPACTNESS number a1 for which lim Ts1,n f1 a1 . n We again use (1) to conclude that the sequence of real numbers Ts 1, n f 2 is bounded and so again by the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, there is a subsequence s 2, n of s 1, n and a number for a2 which lim Ts 2,n f2 a2 .We inductively continue this n selection process to obtain a countable collection of strictly increasing sequences of natural numbers s j, n j1 and a sequence of real numbers a j such that for each j , s j 1, n is a subsequence of M. 1 1 , we have verified (2). p q It remains to consider the case p 1 . We must show that M is an essential upper bound for f . We argue by contradiction. If M is not an essential upper bound, then there is some Since 1 ∈>0 for which the set X x X : f x M has nonzero measure. Since X is finite, we may choose a subset of X with finite positive measure. If we let g be the characteristic function of such a set we contradict (1). T f j aj . s j, n , and lim n s j,n For each index k , define nk s k , k . Then for each j , nk k j is a subsequence of s j, k lim Tnk f j a j for all j .Since T n k k is and hence bounded in f is a Cauchy sequence for each a dense subset of X , T f is Cauchy for all X * and T n k nk f is f in X . The real numbers are complete. Therefore we may define T f limTnk f for all f X . k @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1147 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 Since each Tnk is linear, the limit functional T is linear. M . f for all k and T f lim Tn f M . f for all f X k Since Tnk f all f X , k Therefore T is bounded. Theorem 5.3 Let E be a measurable set and 1 p . Then every bounded sequence in Lp E has a subsequence that converges weakly in Lp E to a function in Lp E . Proof: Let q be the conjugate of p . Let f n be a bounded sequence in Lp E . Define X Lq E . Let n be a natural number. Define the functional Tn on Tn g fn .g for g in X L E . q E We use the statement, ‟ Let E be a measurable set, 1 p , q the conjugate of p and g belong to Lq E . Define the functional T on Lp E by T f g. f for all f L E . p E Then T is a bounded linear functional on Lp E and T * g q .” Now p and q interchanged and the observation that p is the conjugate of q , tells us that each Tn is a bounded linear functional on X and Since fn Tn * fn p is a bounded sequence in Lp E , Tn is a for which Tn f M . f for all f in X and all n ”. Then there is subsequence Tnk of Tn and T in X * f T f for all f in for which lim Tnk k is Note 5.2: The following theorem tells the existence of week sequential compactness on Lp space X by bounded, that is, there is an M 0 a subsequence Tnk and T X * X .”There such that limTnk g T g for all g in X Lq E …(1) k The Riesz Representation Theorem, with p and q interchanged, tells us that there is a function f in Lp E for which T g f .g for all g in X L E . q E But (1)means that lim k f nk E .g f .g for all g in E g. f n g. f X Lq E lim . n E E According to‟ Let E be a measurable set, 1 p and q the conjugate of p . Then f n f in Lp E if and only iffor all g Lq E .” converges weakly to f Therefore f nk in Lp E . Hence every bounded sequence in Lp E has a subsequence that converges weakly in Lp E to a function in Lp E . 6. CONCLUSION In this paper the duality, weak convergences and weak sequential compactness on 𝐿 space has been discussed. A new generalized 𝐿 space viz. theorem of compactness on 𝐿 spaceare investigated. We hope that the space will be a powerful tool to study the various properties of lebesgue space and this endeavor is a small step towards that goal. bounded sequence in X * . Moreover, according to ‟ A function f on a closed, REFERENCES bounded interval 1. Novinger, W.P [1992], Mean convergence in Lp spaces, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 34, 627-628. a, b is absolutely continuous on a, b if and if only if it is an indefinite integral over a, b .” [3] Since 1 q , X Lq E is separable. Therefore, by ‟Let X be a separable normed linear space and Tn a sequence in its dual space X * that is 2. Walter Rudin [1966], Real and complex analysis, 3rdedition, Tata McGraw Hill, New York, 1987. 3. Roydon,H.L[1963], Real Analysis, 3rd edition, Macmillan, New York, 1988. @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1148 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470 4. Jain P.K, Gupta V.P and Pankaj Jain, Lebesgue Measure And Integration, 2nd edition, New Age International (P) Limited, New Delhi. 5. Carothers N.L, Real University press, UK. Analysis, Cambridge 6. Karunakaran .V, Real Analysis, Pearson, India, www.pearsoned.co.in/vkarunakaran. 7. Royden H.L, and Fitzpatrick P.M, Real Analysis, 4th edition, Pearson India Education Services Pvt. Ltd. India, www.peaeson.co.in. 8. FrigyesRiesz and BelaSz-Nagy, Analysis,Dover, 1990. Functional @ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 1 | Nov-Dec 2017 Page: 1149