Why Study Auditing? Auditing and assurance services play an important role in ensuring the reliability, credibility and relevance of business information which is used for decision making purposes. Users of financial statements have additional assurance that the financial statement are reported honestly and accurately, and the users will be more willing to rely on and trust these financial statements. Reliable information is important for managers, investors, creditors, analysts, employees, regulatory bodies, and others to make informed decisions in the form of economic and financial decision. Auditing also helps to ensure that information is understandable, relevant, reliable, and trustworthy. Auditing is vital to the proper functioning of the economic system The Objectives, Purpose, and Importance of Audit What is Auditing? Auditing is the process of reviewing the financial statements, that is prepared by the management of the company, to determine whether the financial statements: Comply with the applicable financial reporting framework (i.e. accounting standards, MFRS/IFRS). Are free of material misstatements; and Comply with the requirements of the Companies Act, 2016 MAIN DEFINITION Overall objectives of an auditing To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether the MM is due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework; and To report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the ISAs, in accordance with the auditor’s findings. Purpose of an Audit – ISA200 To enhance the degree of confidence of intended users in the financial statements. An auditor expresses an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework. An audit conducted in accordance with ISAs and relevant ethical requirements enables the auditor to form that opinion. Objectives and Purpose of an Audit – Important Phrases Reasonable assurance is the highest level of assurance that can be given by an auditor to the users of financial statements. Auditors do not provide absolute assurance which means 100% assurance. Financial information/statements consist of income statements, statement of financial position, statement of changes in equity, cash flow statements, notes to the financial statements Misstatement is an unintentional errors or intentional fraud Material is the concept of materiality Applicable financial reporting framework consist of IFRS/MFRS; MPERS; or FRS) Auditors’ Opinion can be either Unmodified/Clean/Unqualified OR Modified Ethical requirements – MIA professional code of conduct, IESBA rule Auditor’s Responsibilities The auditor has a responsibility to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud. Due to the nature of audit evidence and the characteristics of fraud, the auditor is only able to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that material misstatements are detected. Auditors’ Personal Responsibility The auditors have a personal responsibility to: Have appropriate competence Comply with ethical requirements Maintain professional scepticism and professional judgement Professional Judgement The auditor, within the context provided by auditing and ethical standards, applies relevant training, knowledge, and experience in making informed decisions during the audit Professional Skepticism ISA 200 para 13 definition: “an attitude that includes a questioning mind, being alert to conditions which may indicate possible misstatement due to error or fraud, and a critical assessment of audit evidence”. ISAs explicitly require the auditor to plan and perform an audit with professional skepticism recognising that circumstances may exist that cause the financial statements to be materially misstated Professional scepticism requires that, throughout the audit, the auditors should be alert for: Audit evidence that contradicts other evidence Information that raises a question about the reliability of documents and responses to inquiries Conditions indicating possible fraud Circumstances suggesting the need for additional audit procedures beyond those ordinarily required Reasonable Assurance Auditors’ work in the audit of financial statements results in the auditors being able to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements follow applicable financial reporting framework Reasonable assurance implies that there is a low level of audit risk (i.e. that the financial statements are properly stated when they are not). The auditors express an opinion on the financial statements, not statement of fact Reasonable assurance is achieved when audit risk is at an acceptably low level Obtaining absolute assurance is not possible because: 1. The nature of financial reporting (e.g. necessary use of judgement and estimates) 2. The nature of audit procedures (e.g. audit procedures more often than not do not provide absolutely conclusive evidence; use of sampling) 3. The need to conduct an audit within a reasonable period of time at a reasonable cost 4. Incidence of fraud is difficult to detect because it involves concealment, collusion, manipulation and overriding control procedures Independence of Auditors It is critical that auditors remain independent when performing audits of financial statements. An auditor’s opinion on the financial statements will be questioned unless the auditor is truly independent. An auditor who owns shares in a company that they audit, or if the auditor serves as a director – the auditor is likely to be biased in the performance of his auditing duties. The auditor should avoid any relationship with a client that would cause an outsider who have knowledge of all the facts to doubt the auditor’s independence. Independence of auditor is a primary ethical requirement which is: Independent to report errors and irregularities which the auditor discovers Independence is the most critical area of the auditor’s credibility Two factors are important to independence: Independence in fact (state of the mind where the auditors are expected to dissociate themselves from influences that might affect their judgments) Independence in appearance (public perception of auditors’ independence) The Role of Auditing Auditing can be described within several contexts: 1. As a process of review 2. In the framework of the principal-agent relationship 3. As a major component of the corporate governance process 4. As a fundamental piece of the capital markets system 1. Auditing as a Process Review Auditing is the process of reviewing (or examining) the financial information prepared by the management of a company (the financial statements and the footnotes) to determine that it conforms to a particular standard (i.e. the applicable financial reporting framework). The person conducting the assessment follows a set of standards (i.e. generally accepted auditing standards / International Standard on Auditing). The person completing the assessment is not an employee of the company but works for an accounting firm that is associated with the company by being hired to perform an audit (a firm that is independent from the company).The person doing the assessment is hired to verify the truth and fairness of the decisions recorded by the company so that outsiders have accurate information to make decisions. Without such assessment, outsiders would be forced to rely solely on the information the company provided. 2. Auditing in the Framework of the Principal-Agent Relationship Principal-agent relationship exists because the owners of the company (i.e. the principals) are not involved in the daily management of the company. The management (i.e. the agent) is hired by the owners of the company (i.e. principal) to run the company for them and to make daily decisions for the company. Owners of the company (i.e. principal) are removed from the its daily operations and that management (i.e. agent) has more knowledge about the daily operations than the owners. Owners would like management to report correctly, so the owners appoint an auditor to increase the likelihood of correct reporting. Knowing that an auditor will assess the financial information, management is likely to prepare the information in accordance with the accounting standards. Benefits outsiders too who will be getting the same financial information as the owners. 3. Auditing as a Major Component of the Corporate Governance Process A Model of Business: Business organisations exist to create value for their stakeholders. Due to the way resources are invested and managed in the modern business world, a system of corporate governance is necessary, through which managers are overseen and supervised.The term Corporate Governance refers to the rules, processes and laws by which businesses are operated, regulated and controlled. Effective corporate governance requires that the interests of a company’s management, shareholders, creditors, and other stakeholders be properly balanced. The Corporate Governance process protects outsiders from misstated financial statements. Auditor performs an important and unique role in the CG process, being a trained professional independent of the company. Being independent, auditors can provide an opinion on whether the financial statements presented by management have been prepared according to an applicable financial reporting framework. Outsiders might reasonably trust an opinion from an independent professional than an opinion from a non-independent person. Auditor will present a relatively unbiased picture of the company’s compliance or noncompliance with the applicable financial reporting framework. 4. Auditing as a Fundamental Piece of the Capital Markets System Capital markets require accurate information. Outsiders make decisions about the companies based on information disclosed. If information is wrong, the decision is likely to be wrong. If auditors fail to do their job, their failure has serious implications for the decisions made by outsiders. Examples: Banks may wrongly lend to companies that they shouldn’t or may lend at a lower interest rate than appropriate had the banks known the correct information. Investors may fail to sell or buy shares in companies they wouldn’t if they had information that fairly presented the company’s financial position. Management’s Incentive to Misstate Financial Statements To be a good auditor, it is important to understand management’s incentive to misstate financial statements. Management of public companies typically prefer higher net income to lower net income. Net income can be increased by either reducing expenses or increasing revenues .Managers may try to show that revenue has increased, even if it has not, because outsiders, particularly stockholders, expect this level of growth and if companies fail to meet these targets, the company’s stock price may drop. The principal reason to misstate financial statements is to keep the company’s stock price from falling The areas in which management is more likely to misstate transactions are riskier for the auditor => failure to correct the misstatement may lead to the issuance of “clean” audit opinion on financial statements that are materially misstated. Auditor’s should gather sufficient appropriate evidence and to assess with professional skepticism the decisions that management made in preparing the financial statements Plan the audit to devote an increased amount of time to transactions that are more likely to be wrong than other transactions Identify financial statement accounts with the most potential for misstatement Design audit procedures to determine that the accounts are fairly presented according to the applicable financial reporting framework Gather evidence to support the assessment that the financial statements are prepared using applicable financial reporting framework Management Assertions about Financial Statements: An Introduction Management Assertions Management of businesses make implicit assertions about the financial statements to the users of these financial statements. These assertions are implicit for each account in the financial statements. Financial statement assertions (or management assertions about financial statements) are management’s expressed or implied claims about information reflected in the financial statements. Financial statement assertions are important to the auditors: The auditors collect sufficient appropriate evidence that management assertions about the financial statements are correct Understanding management assertions in terms of classes of transactions, account balances, and presentation and disclosures help the auditors focus on the different types of audit procedures needed to test the assertions in the 3 different categories Examples: Assets – owners of assets have the right to use the assets in anyway that the owners want – rights management assertion Liabilities – creditors are obligated to pay and to settle their liabilities – obligations management assertion Income statement for the year ended 30 June 2018 – implies that all transactions relating to income and expenses for the financial year have been recorded in the proper accounting period – cut-off management assertion Defining Auditing and Assurance Auditing and Assurance Defined Auditing definition Assurance Definition Distinction between Auditing and Accounting What is Accounting? Accounting is the recording, classifying, and summarising of economic events in a logical manner for the purpose of providing financial information for decision making. To provide relevant information, accountants must have a thorough understanding of the principles and rules that provide the basis for preparing the accounting information. Accountants must develop a system to ensure the company’s economic events are properly recorded on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost. Overview of the Financial Statement Audit Process Distinction between Auditing and Accounting Auditors focus on determining whether recorded information properly reflects the economic events that occurred during the accounting period. Auditors must understand those international accounting standards that provide the criteria for evaluating whether the accounting information is properly recorded. Auditor possess the expertise to accumulate and interpret audit evidence – the differentiating factor that distinguishes auditors from accountants. Fundamental Concepts in Conducting a Financial Statement Audit: An Introduction Management assertions about the financial statements are used by the auditors as the framework to guide the auditors in the collection of audit evidence. Management assertions, together with he auditor’s assessments of materiality and audit risk influence the nature, timing and extent of the audit evidence to be gathered Materiality Audit Risk risk that the auditor expresses a wrong opinion sedangkan the FS is actually mm Evidence Regarding Management Assertions Sampling: Inferences Based on Limited Observations The Audit Process: An Introduction The Audit Process The Audit Report: An Introduction Issue the Audit Report The auditor’s report is the main product or output of the audit. The audit report with an unmodified (‘clean’) opinion is the most common type of report issued. The title line of the audit report includes the word ‘Independent’, and usually, the report is addressed to the stockholders of the company. The audit report includes an introductory paragraph, a management’s responsibility paragraph, an auditor’s responsibility paragraph, an auditor’s opinion paragraph and basis of auditor’s opinion . The audit report is signed and dated. The auditor may issue a modified opinion. Suppose an auditee’s financial statements contain a misstatement that the auditor considers material and the client refuses to correct the misstatement. The auditor will likely qualify the opinion, explaining that the financial statements are fairly stated except for the misstatement identified by the auditor. The auditor may issue an adverse opinion. Suppose a client’s financial statements contain a material misstatement and the auditor considers the significance of the effect on the financial statements of the material misstatement pervasive. Given such a situation, the auditor will issue an adverse opinion, indicating that the financial statements are not fairly stated and should not be relied upon. Different Types of Auditors, and the Services provided by the Auditors Types of Auditors Types of Services Offered by Audit Firms Public Accounting Firms Audit Firms – Big 5 Audit Firms Audit Firms – Others Challenges Facing the Auditing Profession Regulation Society’s Expectations and the Auditors’ Responsibilities Society’s Expectations Financial statement audits have a very important role in the functioning of the economy, thus, society expects auditors to exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism in their work .If the auditor fails to exercise professional judgement and to maintain professional scepticism, he/she may be held liable for civil damages or even criminal penalties The Context of Financial Statement Auditing Context of Financial Statement Auditing A Model of Business The Role of the Auditor in the Corporate Governance Process Today’s auditor plays a crucial role in business and society. However, recent audit failures have taken a toll on the accounting profession, including the loss of public reputation Recent scandals have demonstrated the vulnerability of accounting firms and the high cost of audit failures In 2002, Arthur Andersen‘s audit failure forced it out of business The public value of the audit cannot be too highly emphasized. The negative impact of failed audits –loss of public confidence and investors’ trust—is very apparent to observers of the profession. The accounting profession is currently reforming itself. Auditors are expected to approach an audit with an independent mind and to recognise that they are appointed to protect the interests of outsiders. Principle A of the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (revised 2017) requires the integrity of financial and nonfinancial reporting to be upheld as one of the many responsibilities of the Board of Directors of public listed companies; and Principle B of MCCG 2017 recommends that the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of public-listed companies establish policies and procedures to assess the suitability, objectivity and independence of external auditors The Auditing Standards and the Auditing Standard-Setting Body Ethics, Independence and the Code of Ethics Ethical behaviour and auditors’ independence are vital to the audit function. Auditors are required to be competent and independent. Auditors who are incompetent or lacks independence will result in affected parties placing little or no value on the audit IESBA Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants Auditors’ Legal Liability