Uploaded by Dustin Diener

Final paper

advertisement
Dustin Diener
HUMN-115-001
Miles
5/13/2020
Corona Issue
The issue needing a resolution is deciding whether to increase the price on our
medical supplies or not. Increasing price would lead to a larger profit margin with our
dwindling supplies. If we keep the price the same we can still expect demand to
increase, but it may not reach all the people that need it. If the price is lowered it would
allow for those who need it more accessibility, but could drain our supplies faster then
we can restock. We must decide from these 3 options.
The core value of an entrepreneur is to be a problem solver. This can be for an
internal problem or an external one. The origins of this really come from the evolution of
mankind. As we evolved we needed more tools to perform tasks. We have always been
entrepreneurs as we have always been able to solve problems. At the utmost core, this
is what being an entrepreneur is about. With this being said, since we are problem
solvers it’s our ethical duty to help others with their issues.
The industry norms in the U.S. have been to maintain their prices. Most states
and countries outside of the U.S. have laws inplace to avoid price gouging. Without
these laws I would imagine that most companies would try to raise their prices as soon
as possible to try to capitalize on the higher demand. These companies would most
likely be giants of the industry. Though, some would sustain the prices they have in
order to try to help other people out. Some unexpected companies have also reached
out a hand in trying to help those in need, or have even shifted their manufacturing in
order to make masks, face shields, and gloves.
The main ethical issue put into question is responsibility. Should we be
maintaining a level of social responsibility that we have had or should we be going
above what we have in the past? A secondary issue would be centered around
compassion. Should we show compassion in the dire time or should we refrain for fear
of the future?
There are many different approaches to take throughout this issue. The utilitarian
approach would be to benefit the most. The most beneficial to society would be to give
the rest of our supplies to impoverished areas. This would allow for those who can’t
afford supplies to get them, but we would make no profit. Most stakeholders will not be
satisfied by this decision. The rights approach would be almost opposite of what was
previously mentioned. It’s basically saying we have the right to increase our prices.
Which we could, if we wanted to sell our supply in a country that allows for price
gouging. This would allow for a short term profit gain, but could lead to a long term
damaged reputation in the public eye. The fairness approach is basically a middle
ground. We would continue operations as usual with no increase or decrease in price.
This would allow for an equal playing field for our customers to get our product as only
the demand has changed, we as a company have not. The common good approach is
close to the utilitarian approach. If we followed this approach we would focus on our
surrounding community and lower the price on our products. It’s possible to get them
out for free as well, but this largely focuses on the surrounding community. This would
hopefully allow our customers to trust us and keep us in business though COVID-19.
The last approach is the virtue approach. This is sticking to the value of being a problem
solver. Meaning that we would also need to help others with their problems as well. If
we chose this approach then we would most likely follow the same steps as the
utilitarian or common good approaches with the same result.
I believe the common good approach would be the smartest gamble to take. This
is because it would allow us to focus on helping our community. Our community is what
will keep us in business though and pass the COVID-19 outbreak if we treat them with
compassion. I recommend we lower the prices on our products and focus on helping
where it is needed. This will allow us to maintain a high amount of ethicality while not
going out of business.
As a producer of medical supplies our main focus is to help people. Although we
would like to help everyone in the world, we can’t. We are a small start-up that’s just
starting to get our feet wet. We can’t afford to give out many supplies for free, but we
can give out what we can. We also still need to be able to maintain a level of profitability
to function, but not enough to sustainably grow. With that being said I believe we need
to perform an in-depth profit analysis to see how far we can drop our prices before
hitting a level of financial insecurity.
Download