PEER ASSESSMENT COLLABORATION RUBRIC
4
PARTICIPATION
3
Group member participated fully and
was always on task.
2
1
Group member participated most
Group member participated but
Group
member
of the time and was on task most
wasted time regularly or was
participate,
of the time.
rarely on task.
worked on unrelated material.
wasted
did
not
time,
Group member assumed leadership in
LEADERSHIP
an appropriate way when necessary
by helping the group stay on track,
encouraging
group
participation,
posing solutions to problems, and
Group
member
assumed
sometimes
leadership
in
an
appropriate way.
Group member usually allowed
others
to
assume
leadership,
alternatively, or often dominated
the group.
Group member did not assume
leadership or assumed it in a
nonproductive manner.
having a positive attitude.
LISTENING
FEEDBACK
Group member listened carefully to
Group member usually listened to
Group member sometimes did
others’ ideas.
others’ ideas.
not listen to others’ ideas.
Group
member
constructive
appropriate.
offered
detailed,
feedback
when
Group
constructive
appropriate.
member
feedback
offered
when
Group
member
offered
constructive
Group member did not listen to
others and often interrupted
them.
occasionally
feedback,
but sometimes the comments
were inappropriate or not useful.
Group member did not offer
constructive or useful feedback.
or
COOPERATION
Group
member
treated
others
member
usually
treated
Group
member
sometimes
Group
member
often
treated
respectfully and shared the workload
others respectfully and shared the
treated others disrespectfully or
others disrespectfully or did not
fairly.
workload fairly.
did not share the workload fairly.
share the workload fairly.
Group member usually completed
TIME
MANAGEMENT
Group
Group member completed assigned
tasks on time.
assigned tasks on time and did
not hold up progress on the
projects because of incomplete
work.
Group Member
Participation
Group member did not complete
Group member often did not
most of the assigned tasks on
complete assigned tasks on time,
time and often forced the group
and
to make last-minute adjustments
held
up
completion
of
project work.
and changes to accommodate
missing work.
Leadership
Listening
Feedback
Time
Cooperation
Management
Jailani
4
4
4
4
4
4
Gaunzon
4
4
4
4
4
4
Rivera
4
4
4
4
4
4
Ricalde
4
4
4
4
4
4
Estrella
4
4
4
4
4
4
Baliong
4
4
4
4
4
4
Javier
4
4
4
4
4
4
Acbay
4
4
4
4
4
4
Coste
4
4
4
4
4
4
Ibisate
4
4
4
4
4
4
Beringuel
4
4
4
4
4
4
Peer Assessment Scoring (Based on Average Total Peer Rating)
3.5 – 4.0 = 50; 2.9 – 3.4 = 45; 2.3 – 2.8 = 40; 1.7 – 2.2 = 35; 1.1 – 1.6 = 30.
YOUR SCORE WOULD BE: 70% of the Group Score + 30% of Your Average Total Peer Rating
COMMENTS:
1. What did you learn from the experience?
Aside from learning more about the topic of the paper, I appreciate the value of teamwork even more now after this experience.
I’m currently in my hometown and our town really does not have signal. I have to go to the city to obtain internet connection. My
groupmates were very considerate and understood that I am unable to be as interactive and responsive as others. I’m very grateful.
2. What do you think went well?
Considering that our side was a little harder to argue for, I think the points that the group gathered were strong. The final
position paper was superbly written too. Nice did a really nice job.
3. What would you have done differently, given the opportunity?
The circumstances prevented me from being as interactive as I would have liked.
4. Do you have any other comments or suggestions about the project?
I like this project. It forced me to think outside of the box and expanded my understanding.