NAME OF THE COURT
IN THE FBI
IN THE USSS
JANE DOE
Plaintiff,
vs
JOHN DOE
Defendant,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Number:
(case number goes here)
Order to Show Cause
Comes Now, John Doe, Authorized Representative for the alleged Defendant in the above-styled civil action,
and files this his order to show cause to the Plaintiff’s petition for child support. It is not believed that the
alleged Defendant has any contractual agreement with the said Plaintiff. Therefore, the burden of proof is on the
Plaintiff to prove her claim. If the Plaintiff fails to provide evidence to substantiate her claim, alleged Defendant
shall move the court for immediate dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a claim for which relief can be
granted.
Further sayeth not.
The cause of action are Social Security Act §1101(d)1, 42 U.S. Code § 13012, violation of the supremacy clause3,
Equitable Estoppel Law, Violation of the First Civil Right 1866, fruit of the poisonous tree4, 18 U.S. Code § 241,
18 U.S. Code § 242, 18 U.S. Code § 1001, 18 U.S. Code § 1002, 42 U.S. Code § 1981, 42 U.S. Code § 1983 and
42 U.S. Code § 14141 transferred to 34 U.S. Code § 126015
I raise the fruit of poisonous three because did under color of law committed treason, fraud and forge court
instrument against my will.
Rebuttal of Presumptions of the Court
Now comes rebuttal all of the following presumptions of this court matter:
a) No official(s) has been appointed or recognized as having agent jurisdiction for the alleged Defendant
unless valid patents under which such claim is made are produced immediately.
b) This “court” is a privately own business and its officials took oaths to a foreign state, England’s own
British Accreditation Registry (BAR), therefore are of foreign status to the persons of this case pursuant
to 8 U.S. Code § 1481, therefore having no authority to administer in such way to deprive the People of
Georgia Republic of any rights protected by the Constitution without probable cause.
1
Social Security Act §1101(d) Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing any Federal official, agent, or representative, in
carrying out any of the provisions of this Act, to take charge of any child over the objection of either of the parents of such child, or of
the person standing in loco parentis to such child.
2
42 U.S. Code § 1301(d) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as authorizing any Federal official, agent, or representative, in
carrying out any of the provisions of this chapter, to take charge of any child over the objection of either of the parents of such child,
or of the person standing in loco parentis to such child.
3
The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States, Article VI, Clause 2, establishes that the Constitution, federal laws
made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the “supreme Law of the Land”, and thus take priority over any
conflicting state laws. It provides that state courts are bound by, and state constitutions subordinate to, the supreme law. However,
federal statutes and treaties are supreme only if they do not contravene the Constitution.
4
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree - A doctrine that extends the exclusionary rule to make evidence inadmissible in court if it was derived
from evidence that was illegally obtained. As the metaphor suggests, if the evidential "tree" is tainted, so is its "fruit." The doctrine
was established in 1920 by the decision in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, and the phrase "fruit of the poisonous tree" was
coined by Justice Frankfurter in his 1939 opinion in Nardone v. United States.
5
34 U.S. Code § 12601 - Cause of action- (a) Unlawful conduct - It shall be unlawful for any governmental authority, or any agent
thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority, to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement
officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the
incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of
the United States.
Page 1 of 3
c) Said private officials have conflict of interest since they cannot possibly stand under public oath and
oath to a foreign state simultaneously.
d) Members of the BAR acting in the capacity of “public officials” such as judges, prosecutors, and
magistrates during court proceedings are not immune from personal claims of injury and liability.
e) This case is a part of the Public Record and my filing on the Public Record of papers issued by the
state identifying my registered control as executor of the fictitious all-caps-name proves that the alleged
Defendant on the Court’s docket and in this case is not the same as the man solely authorized to conduct
business with said name.
YOU RESPONSE WILL BE ONLY ACCEPTED under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1746 (2)
and under false statements, concealment pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 1001.
John Doe
c/o 123 Pine Hurst Drive
Columbus, Georgia [12345]
By: _____________________________AR
Authorized Representative for
JOHN DOE
State of Georgia
}
}ss
Muscogee County
}
Subscribed and sworn before me on the _____
day of ___________, of the year ______.
______________________________
Notary Public
Certificate of Service
This is to certify that a copy of this “Order to Show Cause” and "COL Form" has been served to the following
individuals via certified mail, regular mail or hand delivery:
Judge's Natural Name
Address
Certified mail: 12344455556778889
Prosecutor or Case Workers
Address
Page 2 of 3
Certified mail: 12344455556778889
This ____ day of August, 2019
c/o 123 Pine Hurst Drive
Columbus, Georgia [12345]
By: _______________________________AR
Authorized Representative for
JOHN DOE
Page 3 of 3