Errors and corrections
Page 1
For males, the 2 cases diagnosed by urinary examination was diagnosed also by US
For males, the 2 cases detected by urinary examination was diagnosed also by US
Page 2
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 7
Female are the most commonly
Female were the most commonly
Studies in Sweden and other parts of Europe decide that
Studies in Sweden and other parts of Europe decided that
basic test for evaluation of suspected
basic test for the evaluation of suspected
2- 59 years were selected randomly
2- 59 years were randomly selected
All the patient are selected after the abdominal ultrasound revealed the
All the patient were selected after the abdominal ultrasound detected the
the patient are carried out using Logic 9 (GE machine) using 3.5 /5MHz
the patient were carried out using Logic 9 (GE machine) with 3.5 /5MHz
Page 3
Statistical analysis
Paragraph 1
Frequency of participants who suffer from
examinations; were calculated
examinations; were calculated
with urinary infection by urine culture
with urinary infection diagnosed by urine culture
without urinary infection by urine
without urinary infection diagnosed by urine
without urinary infection by
without urinary infection diagnosed by
those without urinary infection by urine
those without urinary infection diagnosed by urine
Results
36.57 + 14.84 years (range: 6-59 years), while the mean age for female patients was 22.75 + 19.55 years
36.57 ± 14.84 years (range: 6-59 years), while the mean age for female patients was 22.75 ± 19.55 years
cases diagnosed by urinary examination was diagnosed
cases detected by urinary examination was diagnosed
Page 7
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 8
medical treatment at 2007 was
medical treatment in 2007 was
In between 2006 and 2009, in the United state,
Between 2006 and 2009, in the United States,
with UTI ask for
with UTI asked for
Each year in the United state about 10%
Each year in the United States about 10%
referred as a name of dirty
referred to as dirty
areas within not rising to the level of minimal back pressure changes with blurring of renal sinus fat
this sences is not clear, and needs to be clarified more.
Comments to the Author
Such a good novel study would be more informative if the values to consider the results
true positive or false negative were mentioned.