Analytical strategies of sample preparation for determination of mercury in food matrices - A review Sergio L.C. Ferreira, Valfredo A. Lemos, Laiana O.B. Silva, Antonio F.S. Queiroz, Anderson S. Souza, Erik G.P. da Silva, Walter N.L. dos Santos, Cesário F. das Virgens PII: DOI: Reference: S0026-265X(15)00037-5 doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.02.012 MICROC 2095 To appear in: Microchemical Journal Received date: Revised date: Accepted date: 16 January 2015 2 February 2015 25 February 2015 Please cite this article as: Sergio L.C. Ferreira, Valfredo A. Lemos, Laiana O.B. Silva, Antonio F.S. Queiroz, Anderson S. Souza, Erik G.P. da Silva, Walter N.L. dos Santos, Cesário F. das Virgens, Analytical strategies of sample preparation for determination of mercury in food matrices - A review, Microchemical Journal (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.02.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Analytical strategies of sample preparation for determination of mercury in food matrices - T A review IP Sergio L. C. Ferreira1,2, Valfredo A. Lemos3, Laiana O. B. Silva1,2, Antonio F. S. Queiroz4, SC R Anderson S. Souza1,2, Erik G. P. da Silva5, Walter N. L. dos Santos6, NU Cesário F. das Virgens6 1- Universidade Federal da Bahia, Grupo de Pesquisa em Química e Quimiometria, 40170- MA 270, Salvador - Bahia, Brazil. 2- Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia, INCT, de Energia e Ambiente, Universidade D Federal da Bahia, 40170-290, Salvador - Bahia, Brazil. CE P Jequié - Bahia, Brazil. TE 3- Universidade Estadual Sudoeste Bahia, Laboratório de Química Analítica LQA, 45206-510, 4- Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Geociencias, 40170-290, Salvador - Bahia, Brazil. AC 5- Universidade Estadual Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia, 45662900, Ilheus, - Bahia, Brazil. 6- Universidade do Estado da Bahia, Departamento de Ciências Exatas e da Terra, 41150000, Salvador - Bahia, Brazil. Author correspondence S.L.C. Ferreira E-mail: slcf@ufba.br Tel/Fax: 55-71-32355166 Abstract ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The present paper reports advantages, drawbacks and applications of the main techniques of sample preparation employed during determinations of total mercury and methylmercury in food matrices employing analytical methods such as: cold vapor atomic T absorption spectrometry (CV AAS), cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CV AFS), IP inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), voltammetry, neutron activation SC R analysis and others. The use of slurry sampling, solid sampling, microwave assisted extraction, reflux system by cold finger and Vigreux column were discussed. Also a brief text on use of chromatographic techniques for speciation analysis of mercury is presented. A list of 134 references is cited and analytical characteristics of some these procedures proposed D MA NU are showed as tables. TE Keywords: Mercury; Food samples; Slurry sampling; Solid sampling; Direct Mercury Analyzer: AC CE P Cold finger; Vigreux column; CV AAS; CV AFS; CV ICP-MS. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Contents 1. Introduction T 1.1. Toxicity of mercury and its compounds IP 1.2. Analytical methods SC R 2. Determination of mercury in food matrices employing direct analysis 2.1. Direct Mercury Analyzer (DMA) NU 2.2. Slurry sampling 2.3. Solid sampling MA 3. Strategies involving sample digestion for determination of mercury in food matrices 3.1. Acid digestion bombs 3.4. Vigreux column CE P 4. Other procedures TE 3.3. Microwave digestion D 3.2. Cold finger 5. Speciation analysis of mercury in food samples AC Conclusions ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction 1.1. Human exposure to mercury and its compounds Mercury and its organic and inorganic species are toxic to the central and peripheral T nervous system, however, this toxicity depends of this chemical form, among which organic IP mercury compounds are the most toxic. The principal chemical forms of mercury are: SC R elemental mercury (Hgo), divalent inorganic mercury (Hg2+), methyl mercury (CH3Hg+) and dimethylmercury ((CH3)2Hg) [1]. The biomonitoring of mercury exposure depends of the chemical form. So, blood and urinary mercury are used to assess occupational exposure in NU case of contamination by elemental mercury. For exposure by methylmercury, the bioindicators used are blood and hair samples [1]. The mercury species are volatile and this MA is worrying because the inhalation of mercury vapor and its compounds produce harmful effects on the nervous, digestive and immune systems and the lungs and kidneys. Children and babies are most affected by mercury toxicity. Mercury releases in the environment are D originated from natural sources as such volcanoes and or human activity as production of TE non-ferrous metal (smelters), cement, caustic soda and also waste disposal. For humans, the main contamination by mercury comes from foods, especially fish and seafood. In fishes, CE P elemental mercury is naturally transformed into methylmercury, compound of great toxicity [2,3,4]. Plant foods may also be contaminated by mercury due to use of phosphate fertilizers in agricultural processing [5]. These inputs often contain appreciable amounts of toxic AC elements such as: mercury, cadmium, lead and others. Jesus et al. determined mercury in six phosphate fertilizer samples [5]. The mercury content found varied from 34 to 210 µg kg-1. This way, several plant foods can contain mercury as contaminant. Rice grown in contaminated regions accumulates mercury. It is concerned because mercury can be methylated by bacteria to produce methylmercury. So, many methods have been published for determination of methylmercury in rice [6,7,8,9]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a maximum intake of methylmercury of 1.6 μg kg−1 per week [10]. 1.2. Analytical methods ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The determination of mercury in food samples can be established in two steps: firstly, a sample preparation procedure is required and afterward the quantification step. The sample preparation step is complicated because of the volatile character of mercury and its species T [11]. However, the mercury determination step is relatively simple and it has been often IP performed using the vapor generation technique coupled to atomic absorption spectrometry SC R (CV AAS), fluorescence spectrometry (CV AFS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (CV ICP OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CV ICP-MS) [12,13,14,15,16]. The vapor generation reaction can be performed employing NaBH4 or SnCl2 in acid medium as reducing agent [17,18,19]. NaBH4 promotes faster and more effective NU reduction so that it is preferred to SnCl2. However, the use of NaBH4 promotes the formation of an excess of H2 resulting in spectral interferences. MA Some problems and interference are encountered in the determination of mercury species by ICP-MS [20]. For example, a significant memory effect is observed in the sample D introduction system, resulting in long washing times and poor accuracy and reliability. TE It is suggested that this problem is caused by adherence of mercury to the walls of the spray chamber and the transfer tubing of the introduction system [21]. The mercury CE P vapor builds up slowly in the spray chamber, due to the volatility of the element increased by large pressure during the pneumatic nebulization. This effect has been eliminated by some different approaches, such as adding gold to the samples and standards as a stabilizing AC agent and using a combination of flow injection sample introduction [22]. Additionally, procedures utilizing isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (IDA ICPMS) have been very proposed in recent years [23,24,25,26]. Clémens et al. published a review paper about speciation analysis of mercury in seafood using this technique. Several methods proposed were discussed [2]. Mercury has been determined also using electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry (ET AAS) [27,28]. Alternatively, voltammetric methods have been also proposed for determination of mercury in several matrices. These are suitable for determination of mercury in food samples because they are simple, fast, inexpensive and involve an instrumentation that can easily be operated. Further, the voltammetric methods have low limits of quantification because these are established having a pre-concentration step of mercury on the working electrode and subsequent stripping. A review recently ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT published summarizes methods proposed for the determination of mercury employing electroanalytical techniques including applications for analyze of food samples [29]. The neutron activation analysis (NAA) is a direct analysis technique employed for T many matrices including foods, which have advantages such as: non-destructive character of IP the samples, good accuracy, ability to multi-elemental determinations and high selectivity SC R and sensitivity. This is a good alternative for the determination of mercury considering the volatile nature of this element and the lower limits of quantification that can be obtained AC CE P TE D MA NU [30,31]. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2. Determination of mercury in food matrices employing direct analysis 2.1. Direct Mercury Analyzer (DMA) T The use of the Direct Mercury Analyzer (DMA) is one of the good alternatives that have been IP proposed for determination of trace amounts of mercury in complex matrices, including foods [21 - 30]. This equipment can be employed for analyses in solid and liquid samples and SC R it does not require any pre-treatment of these. It operates on a basis of sample thermal decomposition, followed of mercury catalytic reduction and amalgamation on a gold system for vapor mercury trapping and, subsequently mercury desorption and analytical measured NU by atomic absorption spectrometry. The efficiency of a chemical analysis using DMA depends strongly of the sample homogeneity which is being processed. Generally, the MA calibration curves are established using certified reference materials but, eventually can be performed also by external calibration technique employing aqueous standard solutions D [26,29]. This way, DMA has been used for determination of mercury traces in several matrices [8,32,33]. Ipolyi et al. proposed a method for determination of total mercury and TE methylmercury in mussel samples. Total mercury was quantified using DMA and CE P methylmercury by gas chromatography – mass spectrometry after acid extraction. Two certified reference materials were analyzed and confirmed the accuracy of the method performed for determination of total mercury [34]. Ikem and Egiebor used DMA for AC determination of trace amount of mercury in canned fishes (mackerel, tuna, salmon, sardines and herring). The calibration of the equipment was performed using a certified reference material of dogfish muscle. The analysis of two certified reference materials demonstrated accuracy of this method [35]. Carbonell et al. employed DMA in method proposed for quantification of total mercury and methylmercury content in muscle of seawater fish. Total mercury content is determined directly in the fish muscle and methylmercury after an extraction step using microwave assisted extraction in acidic conditions with toluene [36]. Tsaiab et al determined the total mercury content in 69 red mould rice (Monascus) food samples purchased in Taipei, Taiwan using DMA. During the validation studies the accuracy was confirmed by analysis of a certified reference material of apple leaves. Addition/recovery tests were also performed and the average recovery was 95% [37]. Martin et al. established a method employing DMA for quantification of total mercury content in 87 infant food samples purchased in Lisbon City, Portugal. The accuracy ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT evaluation involved analysis of certified reference materials of skimmed milk powder, rice, spinach, chicken, strawberry leaves and oyster tissue [38]. A method proposed by Torres et al. determined total mercury content in two types of fresh fish samples employing DMA. In T it, analytical curves were performed using external calibration with aqueous standard IP solutions [39]. Vieira et al proposed and compared two methods for determination of SC R mercury in honey samples. A method using CV AAS and the other employing DMA. The principal drawback of the DMA method is the sample amount that is limited at 100 mg, however the DMA method provides limits of detection and quantification lower than CV AAS method [40]. The Table 1 shows analytical parameters of methods proposed for NU determination of mercury in food samples employing DMA. AC CE P TE D MA Table 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.2. Slurry sampling Slurry sampling is a good alternative that has been often employed in recent times for sample preparation during determination of mercury employing spectrometric methods T [41]. In these procedures, the samples are handled with diluted acid solutions under room IP temperature or eventually under temperature conditions that are not critical to loss of SC R volatile elements. The main advantages are: allows frequently use of the external calibration technique, lower risk of contamination by reagents, sample masses and reagent volumes are not parameters critical, such as occur in microwave-assisted digestion with pressurized closed-vessel methods. Additionally, slurry sampling allows also the development of NU procedures for speciation analysis of mercury [42]. Silva et al propose a method for analysis of rice samples. Firstly, the samples are heated at 60 oC for 20 min in closed system and, MA afterward the suspension obtained is sonicated for 30 min at 60 oC in the presence of 6 mol L-1 hydrochloric acid and thiourea. Under these conditions, mercury is quantitatively D transferred from solid phase to liquid phase of the suspension and it is determinate by CV TE AAS [9]. Several analytical techniques have been employed for determination of mercury in food matrices using slurry sampling, however the procedures which used ETV ICP-MS CE P [43,44,45,46] and CV ICP-MS [47] provided have lower limit of quantification. During the determination of mercury in cereals using slurry sampling and flow injection chemical vapor generation as the sample introduction system in ICP-MS, mercury was quantified by isotope AC dilution technique because the external calibration technique cannot be used [38]. CavaMontesinos et al proposed a method employing cold vapour atomic fluorescence for determination of mercury in milk by slurry sampling using multicommutation. Several chemical reagents were used for slurry preparation including potassium bromide and potassium bromate [48]. Segade and Tyson proposed two simple flow injection (FI) systems for mercury speciation analysis in fish tissue samples by slurry sampling cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry [49]. Chen and Jiang developed a method employing slurry sampling electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for determination of arsenic, selenium and mercury in fish samples. Palladium and thioacetamide were used as modifiers. The quantification of the elements was performed using analyte addition technique [50]. The Table 2 shows analytical parameters of methods developed for determination of mercury in food matrices using slurry sampling. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2 T 2.3. Solid sampling IP Direct analysis employing the solid sampling technique has great advantages over sample SC R digestion procedures especially for determination of mercury because of the volatile character this element and its species. Solid sampling allows acceleration and simplification of the analytical procedures of sample preparation with sensitivity due to the absence of any NU dilution, it avoids use of chemical reagents and frequently allows quantifications employing the external calibration technique using aqueous standards. However, the drawbacks of this MA technique are: the accuracy is very influenced by sample homogeneity and low reproducibility. The solid sampling has been utilized for determination of mercury in several matrices as: contaminated soils [51], airborne particulate matter [52], polymers [53], D biological samples [54,55], but its application for food analysis has been limited. Methods TE have been established for determination of mercury in fish [56], tuna fish [50], milk powder [50], spinach [57], seafood [58] and fish [59]. The Table 3 shows analytical parameters of Table 3 AC CE P methods proposed for determination of mercury in food samples. 3. Strategies involving sample digestion for determination of mercury in food matrices 3.1. Closed vessels and thermal heating Acid digestion bombs are closed systems that are heated by convection using conventional oven. In this, the sample amount used for digestion is rigorously controlled because of risk of explosions. In the past, this digester system were widely recommended for sample mineralization during the determination of volatile species including mercury [60,61]. 3.2. Cold finger ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The sample mineralization utilizing the reflux system "cold finger" [62] is one of the strategies that have been recently employed for sample preparation during the determination of volatile chemical elements such as: lead [63,64],arsenic [,65], and others T [66,67]. The “cold finger” is a glass tube in the shape of finger, which is placed over the IP digester tube during the acid digestion by conventional heating using block digester [55]. SC R This system causes reflux and condensation of the volatile species, avoiding the loss by evaporation. Advantages, drawbacks and use of this reflux system during digestion of inorganic and organic matrices are summarized in review paper [55]. The "cold finger" system has been used in sample preparation procedures for determination of mercury in NU sediment samples [68, biological matrices [69], crude oil and related products [70]. However, it has not reported any work involving digestion of food samples for the determination of D MA mercury. TE 3.3. Microwave heating Microwave heating enables a rapid decomposition of samples due a control over the time CE P and heating power. Microwave digestion can be performed in open, closed, and flow systems. Open microwave systems have the risk of escape of volatile components of the sample, which may influence greatly the results. However, this type of system allows AC removal of gaseous products of the reactions and also the addition of reagents during the digestion process. Closed microwave systems are simpler and faster than open systems and their use reduces the risk of contamination. However, this type of device allows the use of only small amounts of sample, due to the large amount of gases released and the consequent risk of explosion. In microwave assisted extraction, the critical experimental factors are the concentration and volume of the extractor reagent, irradiation temperature, extraction time, sample mass and stability of the species [71,72]. Extraction procedures using dilute acid combined with solvent extraction have been proposed solid samples such as food, soil and sediments. Nitric acid, hydrochloric acid and hydrogen peroxide reagents have been used in the digestion procedures. Alkaline solution of tetramethylammonium hydroxide was used in digestion procedure of a method proposed for determination of methylmercury in fish employing gas ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT chromatography-mass spectrometry. Digestion conditions were optimized and the results obtained demonstrated that the analytical signals were strongly dependent of the heating time and irradiating power. Long heating times or high irradiating power resulted in low T content of methylmercury [73]. Tuzen used nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide in a IP microwave digestion system for determination of mercury and other trace elements in fish SC R samples [74]. De Paz et al. also employed hydrogen peroxide and nitric acid in a digestion procedure of fish samples using microwave oven for determination of mercury by flow injection analysis system cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry [75]. Hight and Cheng used a mixture of nitric acid and sodium chloride in microwave oven during digestion of NU seafood samples for determination of total mercury by CV AAS [76]. Drennan-Harris et al. established comparison between microwave digestion and acid extraction procedures MA proposed for determination of mercury in rice samples using ICP-MS. They concluded that both procedures are effective for rice digestion [77]. Carrasco and Vassileva proposed an D analytical procedure for the determination of methylmercury in marine biota samples using TE gas chromatography coupled to atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Five different extraction procedures were tested, including acid and alkaline leaching assisted by microwave and CE P conventional oven heating and also enzymatic digestion. The highest extraction recoveries were obtained using alkaline extraction (potassium hydroxide in methanol), microwaveassisted extraction employing hydrochloric acid and enzymatic digestion with protease XIV AC [78]. A method was proposed for determination of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury in seafood species used for sashimi. The mineralization procedure of the samples was performed in a closed microwave digestion system utilizing 7 mL of concentrated nitric acid and 3 mL of hydrogen peroxide. The elements were determined by ICP OES [79]. Kosanovic et al. quantified cadmium, mercury, lead, arsenic, copper, and zinc in human breast milk by ICP‐MS. The sample mineralization procedure involved use of microwave oven [80]. A sample preparation procedure for the determination of mercury in breast milk was established using a 1 mL of homogenized milk sample, 2 mL suprapur nitric acid and a closed microwave oven. The digested obtained was transferred to a 25 mL volumetric flask utilizing ultrapure water and the total mercury was determined by AFS using stannous chloride as reduction agent [81]. Koplik et al. proposed a method for the determination of methylmercury and inorganic divalent mercury in fish, vegetables, herbs and cereals using reversed-phase liquid chromatography hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT spectrometry. A procedure involving an extraction step of the mercury species using a mercaptoethanol acid solution was efficient for quantification of methylmercury and inorganic divalent mercury in fish muscle and vegetable tissues [82]. Qin el al. determined T total mercury in fishes employing ICP-MS. The sample mineralization was performed using IP nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide in microwave oven [83]. Zhao et al. proposed a method for SC R speciation analysis of mercury in fish samples by using capillary electrophoresis-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The mercury species were extracted using a 1 M hydrochloric acid solution in a microwave digester [84]. The efficiency of eight different analytical procedures commonly used for extraction of mercury species in biological samples NU was evaluated by analysis of a certified reference material of fish used for determination of total mercury and methylmercury [85]. The extraction procedures tested were: alkaline MA extraction with KOH or tetramethylammonium hydroxide; acid leaching with hydrochloric, nitric or acetic; extraction using L-cysteine hydrochloride; and enzymatic digestion with D protease XIV. Total mercury and mercury species from all extractions were determined using TE ICP-MS and HPLC-ICP-MS, respectively. Procedures using alkaline digestion with microwave assisted extraction and ultrasonic assisted extraction were the most efficient, where levels of CE P transformation of mercury species were the lowest (6% or less). Extraction using 5.0 mol L-1 hydrochloric acid and/or enzymatic digestion with protease also showed good results. The authors warn that despite the frequent use of acid leaching for the extraction of mercury species in fish samples, the lowest extraction efficiencies and greater transformation 1 AC between mercury species were obtained when microwave assisted extraction with 4.0 mol Lnitric acid or acetic acid were used [84]. An efficient method was proposed for speciation analysis of mercury in fish tissue using microwave assisted extraction in a closed system. Quantitative extraction of mercury species were obtained by leaching using 5.0 mol L-1 hydrochloric acid and 0.25 mol L-1 sodium chloride for 10 min at 60 oC. Total mercury and mercury species were determined using ICP-MS and HPLC-ICP-MS, respectively [86]. An alternative procedure using a vessel that allows partial release of gases was reported. This device enabled an increase of sample mass, the completeness of oxidation, and the retention of volatile elements in solution [87]. The Table 4 summarizes analytical parameters of procedures proposed for the determination of mercury in food samples employing microwave assisted digestion. 88,899091929394 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4 3.4. Vigreux column In 1990, Landi et al. used the Fricdrichs and Vigreux condensers in sample preparation T procedures during the determination of mercury in vegetable matrices employing CV AAS IP [95]. In another method, these authors employed potassium dichromate, diluted sulphuric SC R acid and a reflux system using a condenser for determination of total mercury in seafood and other protein-rich products by CV AAS [96]. Subsequentially, a sample digestion procedure using the Vigreux column was proposed for the determination of mercury in core NU sediments by cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectroscopy [97]. In the last times, this same research group has established sample preparation procedures using Vigreux column and MA oxidant acid mixtures for determination of mercury in foods as: vegetables [98], teas [99], meals [100] and other matrices [101,102] employing square wave anodic stripping D voltammetry (SW ASV) using a gold electrode. TE 4. Other sample preparation procedures for determination of mercury in food samples CE P Although NAA presents great advantages for the determination of mercury, the employ this technique for analysis of food is relatively low. Singh and Garg determined the content of 16 trace elements in Indian cereals, vegetables and spices employing NAA. The sample AC preparation procedure for neutron irradiation of the seed matrices (rice, wheat fenugreek and black pepper) involved cleaned with tissue paper, followed by drying using an IR lamp at 80°C. Afterward, grinding to powder using a food processor/mixer and an agate mortar. The vegetable samples were washed distilled water and dried in oven <80°C for overnight. Then, these matrices were grinding to powder in an agate mortar [103]. Rizzo et al determined total mercury in muscle and liver of four fish species by NAA. For irradiation, the samples were dried, homogenized and sealed in quartz ampoules. These authors warn that the limits of detection and quantification for mercury in NAA determinations depend strongly of the analytical conditions of the analyzed sample, particularly the gamma-ray spectral background generated by other elements contained in the sample [104]. Anderson evaluated the effect of L-cysteine on drying and neutron irradiation loss of mercury and other elements from fish tissue. During the experiments some tissue samples were dried and ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT analyzed by NAA. Other samples were treated with L-cysteine followed by freeze drying and also analyzed by NAA. The results for the untreated tissues showed that mercury may be largely lost (23–49%) by volatilization during irradiation. Treatment with L-cysteine reduced T significantly these losses, however, these reductions were highly dependent of the drying IP procedure used. Freeze drying of treated tissues at - 50 oC and 1.3 – 2.7 Pa was most SC R efficient (1.0 – 3.5%) [105]. Antoine et al. determined mercury and several other elements in twenty-five rice brands originated from Jamaican using NAA. For neutron irradiation the rice samples were weighed out into pre-cleaned double polyethylene bags and heat sealed in NU pre-cleaned polyethylene vials [106]. Analytical strategies involving microwave-induced combustion (MIC) have been considered MA as a good alternative for sample preparation during determination of metals and non-metals in complex matrices [107, ,108]. This technique has as advantage the possibility to digest relatively large amounts of sample (up to 500 mg) using low volumes of acids, allowing a D final solution with a low residual carbon content. So, MIC has been also employed for sample TE digestion during determination of mercury in fish [109], soil [110] and coal [111]. CE P Schmidt et al. evaluated the influence of drying conditions on the behavior of mercury species (inorganic mercury and methylmercury) present in six different fish species. The drying conditions studied were as follow: air circulation drying oven in different AC temperatures (50 to 175 oC) and lyophilization (0.25 mm Hg, -2 oC). The evaluation of the results was based on losses and conversions of original Hg species after each drying condition. The determination of total mercury and its species were performed employing CVG ICP-MS) and LC-CVG-ICP-MS, respectively. The results demonstrated that for drying temperatures above 100 oC, losses and conversions of methylmercury to inorganic mercury can occur for some fish species [112]. Mashhadizadeh et al proposed a pre-concentration procedure by magnetic solid phase extraction using Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with 3-(trimethoxysilyl)-1-propanethiol and modified with ethylene glycol bis-mercaptoacetate for determination of mercury in food samples (rice, tuna fish and tea leaves) employing CV AAS as analytical technique [113]. Lemos et al employed a pre-concentration system containing a mini-column packed with the Amberlite XAD-4 sorbent functionalised with 2-(2'-benzothiazolylazo)-p-cresol (BTAC) for ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT determination of mercury in fish, shellfish and saliva using CV AAS [114]. An enrichment procedure employing Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with dithizone was investigated for extraction and determination of ultra-trace amounts of mercury in table T salt, green tea, vegetables, toothpaste, and water samples using CV AAS [115]. A pre- IP concentration procedure for determination of amount trace of mercury in sea and river fish SC R samples was proposed using dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction [116]. A procedure for determination of total mercury in muscle tissue of fish was developed using GF AAS. Copper nitrate and sodium tungstate were tested as chemical modifier and permanent modifier, NU respectively. A limit of quantification of 0.047 mg kg-1 was obtained [117]. A multisyringe flow injection system was established for determination of total mercury in MA rice samples using cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CV AFS). The limits of detection and quantification obtained were 0.48 and 1.61 ng g-1, respectively [92]. D A non-chromatographic method was developed for determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in muscles tissues of ten freshwater fish species employing CV AAS as TE analytical technique. For speciation, the digested samples in alkaline conditions were CE P reduced sequentially with stannous chloride and sodium tetrahydroborate for quantification of inorganic mercury and methylmercury, respectively [118]. A procedure involving sample thermal decomposition followed by mercury amalgamation and atomic absorption has been AC performed for determination of methylmercury in fish. An extraction step with toluene and back-extraction into an aqueous L-cysteine solution allows the separation for speciation analysis [119]. An on-line pre-concentration system with valves electronically controlled using a minicolumn packed with polytetrafluoroethylene was developed for determination of mercury in water samples employing CV AAS. In it, mercury(II) ions as pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate complexes are firstly pre-concentrated on the minicolumn and afterward these complexes are eluted and reduced using a solution sodium tetrahydroborate(III). A pre-concentration factor of 35 and a limit of detection of 0.02 µg L-1 was obtained [120]. Goudarzi et al. determined Mercury, lead and cadmium in breast milk of healthy lactating women from Iran. The sample preparation step involved a volume of 25 mL of milk sample and digestion in semi-closed glass apparatus in presence of 7 mL concentrated nitric acid and 3 mL of hydrogen peroxide. After cooling, the volume was adjusted to 50 mL using ultrapure water and mercury as quantified employing CV AAS [121]. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Procedures involving amalgamation in gold traps or Pd-based substrates have been described for the preconcentration of mercury after cold vapor generation [122,123]. Pdbased substrates, such as a Pd wire, Pd-coated SiO2 fiber and Pd-coated stainless steel wire T have also been applied for preconcentration of Hg using solid-phase microextraction IP methodology. Hg vapor generation is carried out in a vial and the volatile Hg formed is then SC R amalgamated onto the Pd-based materials. The preconcentration procedures based on the trapping of mercury on a gold filament preconcentrator are followed by rapid thermal desorption and detection. The absorption of mercury in a gold surface is highly effective and well known [124, 125]. This phenomenon usually generates selective procedures because NU mercury is the only species absorbed if gases acids are removed. Preconcentration using mercury amalgamation in gold trap has been applied to the determination of the element in MA fish tissues [126], water [127] and biological matrices [128]. D 5. Sample preparation for speciation analysis of mercury in food samples TE The determination of organic mercury in food has been frequently reported in the CE P literature, due to the high toxicity of these species [129]. Various chromatographic techniques have been employed for the quantification of mercury species, including the gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [130]. The AC hyphenation with spectrometric detection techniques, such as atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), atomic emission spectrometry (AES), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and mass spectrometry (MS) have resulted in powerful tools for speciation of organic mercury species in various samples such as red wine [131], fish [132,133,134], rice [135] and seafood [136]. Capillary electrophoresis has also been used in some applications. The determination of methylmercury in fish was performed by leaching with HBr analyte extraction with toluene and back-extraction with aqueous L-cysteine [119]. MeHg was determined using sample thermal decomposition followed by mercury amalgamation and atomic absorption. A method for the speciation of mercury in seafood used the hyphenation LC-ICP-MS and a fast sample preparation procedure [128]. Mercaptoethanol, L-cysteine and HCl were used to extract the mercury species, with the aid of sonication for 15.0 minutes. A C8 reverse phase column has been used for separation of mercury species. Organic and inorganic mercury were determined in fresh and canned fish and in blood using a method ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT based on ICP-MS coupled with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [137]. Gas chromatography with atomic emission detection has been used in a simple method for speciation of mercury species in fish and seafood [138]. Methylmercury was measured in T rice (Oryza sativa L.) using gas chromatography (GC)-CVAFS detection. The cereal grown in IP soils from areas of abandoned mercury mines [116]. Flow injection cold vapour generation- SC R inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (FI-CVG-ICP-MS) and gas chromatographyICP-MS (GC-ICP-MS) have been applied to determination of total Hg, inorganic Hg and methylmercury in red wine [112]. Hight and Cheng proposed a method for determination of methylmercury and total mercury in seafood samples [139]. In it, mercury compounds are NU extracted of the samples using 50 mL of an aqueous solution containing V L-cysteine and hydrochloric acid followed of heating by 120 min at 60 oC. Afterward, the mercury MA compounds containing in the aqueous extracts are separated by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography using a C-18 column and detected employing D inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry at mass-to-charge ratio 202. Methyl and TE inorganic mercury are determined in extracts. Montero-Alvarez et al. developed a method for speciation analysis of mercury in edible fish samples employing HPLC-ICP-MS and isotope CE P dilution analysis. The extraction of the mercury species was performed mercaptoethanol, Lcysteine, hidrochloric acid and sonication for 30 min [140]. Huang et al. proposed a procedure for determination of methylmercury and total mercury in marine fish samples AC (five species). Methylmercury was quantified employing HPLC -AFS and total mercury using a direct mercury analyzer. The methylmercury was extracted using microwave radiation [141]. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Conclusions The development of methods for the determination of trace amounts of mercury in food samples has been still important and timely considering the high toxicity of this IP T element and its compounds. During the determination of mercury in food samples the quantification step is very SC R simple and can be done using CV AFS or CV AAS, which are analytical techniques highly sensitive for mercury with low cost. The ICP-MS and CV ICP-MS techniques are also often used but the analytical cost is very high. However, the sample preparation step is very NU critical because of the volatile character of mercury and its compounds. Thus, further studies MA should be made considering the variety of food matrices that may contain this element. The employ of the Direct Mercury Analyzer (DMA) has been a good option for direct determination of mercury in samples of solid and liquid foods. This enables the analysis D without the use of chemical reagents and it allows the use of external calibration technique TE using certified reference materials or aqueous standards. Slurry sampling is a sample preparation technique that has been also very employed CE P for determination of mercury in food samples. In this, the sample amount is not limited as DMA and/or solid sampling technique and the calibration can be performed eventually by external calibration technique using aqueous standards. Procedures have been established AC by chemical vapor generation as: CV AAS, CV AFS, CV ICP-MS and also using electrothermal vaporization-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ETV-ICP-MS), which allows low limits of detection and quantification. Foods of animal and vegetable origin have been analyzed by this technique. The reflux system using "cold finger" has been often employed for sample preparation during the determination of volatile elements. Several methods for determination of mercury in complex matrices as: crude oil, sediment and biological samples have been developed using this digestion strategy. However, there is no a work involving sample preparation using cold finger for determination of mercury in food samples. Studies carried out with other volatile elements in food matrices and the works established for ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT mercury, suggest that this technique of reflux may be used for mineralization of food samples for determination of mercury. Microwave assisted digestion (MAD) in closed vessels has been widely applied for the T digestion of many food matrices during determination of mercury, due to its high efficiency IP and reduced risks of losses and contamination in comparison with conventional digestion SC R procedures using open vessels. For determination of total mercury, the reagents most often used are: nitric acid, hydrochloric acid and hydrogen peroxide. Alkaline digestions using tetramethylammonium or potassium hydroxide have been recommended by several authors NU for determination of methylmercury. The speciation analysis of mercury in food samples has been performed employing MA gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as separation techniques, being the detection established by several spectroanalytical techniques such as: D atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) and AC CE P TE inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB) and T Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for providing grants AC CE P TE D MA NU SC R IP and fellowships and for the financial support. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AC CE P TE D MA NU SC R IP T References ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. Analytical parameters of methods developed for determination of mercury in food samples using DMA Sample LOD LOQ RSD strategy (g) Kg-1 Canned 1 35 0.02 ng <1.5% 36 0.24 µg Kg-1 - 0.1 1.0 ng 4.1% 38 < 1.0% 39 < 4.4% ECT 40 1 2.5 ng g-1 2.7–3.4% g-1 ECT - External calibration technique. AC 37 Kg-1 3.0 µg Kg- CE P Honey 0.1 0.29 µg TE Kg-1 foods Fishes 0.10 µg D 0.1 – 0.5 ECT Kg-1 *Rice Infant < 14.79% MA 0.05 – 0.10 0.6 µg muscle 34 <1.5% fishes Fish ECT 0.01 ng NU 0.1 2 - 14% SC R 0.08 µg 0.3 µg Kg- Nuts Mussel References T mass Calibration IP Sample *- Foods from Taiwan containing red mould rice (Monascus) 41 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 2. Analytical characteristics of methods developed for determination of mercury in Sampl e Homogenizati e mass on Size (µm ) Analytic Precisio generatio al n LO Referenc n techniqu Q es e AC CE P TE D MA NU SC R (g) Vapor T Sampl IP food samples using slurry sampling ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Herbs 0.5 Ultrasonic bath 150 - ETV-ICP-MS 4.0 0.3 ng g-1 44 150 - ETV-ICP-MS < 10 2.6 ng g-1 45 ETV-ICP-MS 2.6 ng g-1 46 ETV-ICP-MS 1.75 ng g-1 47 microcarpa 1.0 Ultrasonic bath and Vortex mixer IP Ficus T Rice and Rice and Wheat flour Ultrasonic bath 100 - 0.2 Ultrasonic bath 100 - 0.6 Ultrasonic bath 2 Ultrasonic bath - Fish 0.25 Magnetic stirrer 100 NaBH4 AC CE P Milk Fish 2.25% (w/v) - heated (85°C) US Rice flour 0.1 MA N Wheat flour 3 mol L-1 HCl TE D Rice and CR Leaves 2.5% (w/v) SnCl2 0.75% (w/v) NaBH4 CV-ICP-MS - 0.23 ng g-1 48 CV AFS 3.4 0.036 ng g−1 49 FI-CV AAS 2.49 221 ng g-1 50 ETV-ICP-MS < 11% 112 ng g-1 51 AC CE P TE D MA NU SC R IP T ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 3. Analytical characteristics of methods developed for determination of total mercury AC CE P TE D MA NU SC R IP T in food samples using direct solid sampling (SS). ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT None ETV-ICPMS Several matrices Up to 35 None GF AAS Seafood - None GF AAS 0.2 - 0.4 Ir permanent + Pd + Mg LOQ 6 ng g-1 TE D CE P AC Fish Ir permanent + Pd + Mg + Triton X-100 GF AAS Remarks References Wet fish; drying step in the temperature program 59 <3 (0.5 - 50 ng) 8 ng g-1 Zeeman-effect background correction; Ni–Cr tube with Pt platform; one-step temperature program 60 1.5 (5 ng) 0.04 ng Special Ni tube furnace; Zeeman-effect background correction 61 - 0.789 µg g-1 Speciation analysis 62 MA N Fish Precision % R.S.D 7.2 (wet fish) T Detection IP Chemical modifier CR Sample mass (mg) ~1 US Sample 0.623 µg g-1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT AC CE P TE D MA NU SC R IP T ETV-ICP-MS electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, GFAAS graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, LOQ limit of quantification, ZAAS zeeman atomic absorption spectrometry. 29 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4. Characteristics of procedures for microwave digestion of food samples for determination of total mercury. Time of Sample amount Reagent for digestion Power (W) samples) or 0.5 nd foodstuffs of and 1.0g (wet animal origin samples) 1.0g 3.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%), 6.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%), 2.0 mL of concentrated H2O2 (30%)and 2.0 mL of H2O D 0.5g 10.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%) 0.1-0.4g Seafood 0.1 mg Rice 0.50g Breast milk 1.0 mL Rice 0.5g Fish 0.25 Rice 0.5g a b b irradiation (min) 10.0 20.0 250 2.0 0 2.0 250 6.0 400 5.0 c technique ICP-MS 97, 98 CV AAS 83 8.0 d 100 , 50 , 15.0 c 100 ,100 d 20.0 100 ,150 c d 20.0 c d 10.0 c d 0.0 100 ,175 100 , 20 Hg analyser 300 4.0 FIAS-CV mL of concentrated H2O2 (30%) 600 2.0 AAS 1.0 mL of 1.0 % w/v NaCl and 5.0 mL of 300 5.0 concentrated HNO3 (65%) 1200 20.0 5.0 800 2.0 800 2.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%), 1.0 mL of 4.0 900 concentrated H2O2 (30%)and 5.0 mL of H2O 2.0 900 10.0 1000 10.0 1000 ----400 2.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%) 200 mg of L-cysteine, 3.0 mL of H2O and 3.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%) e 99 84 CV AAS 85 CV AFS 102 ----- CV AFS 100 20.0 ICP-MS 86 ICP-MS 101 CV AFS 103 5.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%) and 0.5 75 mL of concentrated H2O2 (30%) 180 15 4.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (69%), 2.0 mL of RT-85 3.0 e Referenc 20.0 0 ,0 550 Detection 4.0 mL of concentrated HNO3 (65%) and 0.2 AC Fish CE P TE etary supplements b 800 ,1000 a MA Fish 500 , 800 SC R eakfast and lunch) a 0.2 and 0.5g (dry NU Duplicate meals IP T Sample 1 30 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 85-145 9.0 145-180 4.0 180 15.0 180-30 25.0 T concentrated H2O2 (35%)and 4.0 mL of H2O IP a: inicial; b: final; c: 100% power; d: pression, psi; e: ventilation; TMAH: tetramethylammonium hydroxide; GCMS: gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; ICP-MS: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; CV AAS: SC R cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry; FIAS-CV-AAS: flow injection analysis system cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry; AFS: cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry NU [1] R. Cornelis, J.A. Caruso, H. Crews, K.G. Heumann (Eds.), Handbook of Elemental Speciation, Handbook of Elemental Speciation II: Species in the Environment, Food, Medicine MA and Occupational Health. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 2005. [2] S. Clemens, M. Monperrus, O.F.X. Donard, D. Amouroux, T. Guerin, Mercury speciation in TE D seafood using isotope dilution analysis: A review, Talanta, 89 (2012) 12-20. [3] L. Carrasco, E. Vassileva, Determination of methylmercury in marine biota samples: CE P Method validation, Talanta, 122 (2014) 106-114. [4] T.F. Shen, Q.L. Yue, X.X. Jiang, L. Wang, S.L. Xu, H.B. Li, X.H. Gu, S.Q. Zhang, J.F. Liu, A AC reusable and sensitive biosensor for total mercury in canned fish based on fluorescence polarization, Talanta, 117 (2013) 81-86. [5] R.M. de Jesus, L.O.B. Silva, J.T. Castro, A.D.A. Neto, R.M. de Jesus, Sergio L.C. Ferreira, Determination of mercury in phosphate fertilizers by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, Talanta 16 (2013) 293–297. [6] X. Feng, P. Li, G. Qiu, S. Wang, G. Li, L. Shang, B. Meng, H. Jiang, W. Bai, Z. Li, X. Fu, Human exposure to methylmercury through rice intake in mercury mining areas, Guizhou province, China, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008) 326-32. 31 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [7] G. Qiu, X. Feng, P. Li, S. Wang, G. Li, L. Shang, X. Fu, Methylmercury accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown at abandoned mercury mines in Guizhou, China, J. Agric. Food Chem, IP T 56 (2008) 2465-2468. [8] H. Zhang, D.M. Wang, J.L. Zhang, X.H. Shang, Y.F. Zhao, Y.N. Wu, Total mercury in milled SC R rice and brown rice from China and health risk evaluation, Food Addit. Contam. B, 7 (2014) 141-146. NU [9] L.O.B. Silva, D.G. da Silva, D.J. Leao, G.D. Matos, S.L.C. Ferreira, Slurry sampling for the determination of mercury in rice using cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, Food. MA Anal. Method. 5 (2012) 1289-1295. [10] FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Evaluation of certain food additives D and contaminants: sixty-first report of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food TE additives. Ed. World Health Organization. V. 61. World Health Organization, 2004. CE P [11] H. Matusiewicz, R.E. Sturgeon, Chemical vapor generation with slurry sampling: a review of applications to atomic and mass spectrometry, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 47 (2012) 41-82. AC [12] W. Maher, F. Krikowa, M. Ellwood, S. Foster, R. Jagtap, G. Raber, Overview of hyphenated techniques using an ICP-MS detector with an emphasis on extraction techniques for measurement of metalloids by HPLC-ICPMS, Microchem. J. 105 (2012) 15-31 SI. [13] Z. Long, C. Chen, X.D. Hou, C.B. Zheng, Recent Advance of Hydride Generation-Analytical Atomic Spectrometry: Part II-Analysis of Real Samples, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 47 (2012) 495517. [14] M. Slachcinski, Recent Achievements in Sample Introduction Systems for Use in Chemical Vapor Generation Plasma Optical Emission and Mass Spectrometry: From Macroto Microanalytics, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 49 (2014) 271-321. 32 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [15] A. Ohki, M. Taira, S. Hirakawa, K. Haraguchi, F. Kanechika, T. Nakajima, H. Takanashi, T Determination of mercury in various coals from different countries by heat-vaporization IP atomic absorption spectrometry: Influence of particle size distribution of coal, Microchem. J., 114 (2014) 119-124 SC R [16] E. Stanisz, J. Werner, H. Matusiewicz, Task specific ionic liquid-coated PTFE tube for solid-phase microextraction prior to chemical and photo-induced mercury cold vapour NU generation, Microchem. J., 114 (2014) 229-237 [17] L.B. Escudero, R.A. Olsina, R.G. Wuilloud, Polymer-supported ionic liquid solid phase MA extraction for trace inorganic and organic mercury determination in water samples by flow injection-cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, Talanta 116 (2013) 133-140. D [18] P. Pohl, I.J. Zapata, E. Voges, N.H. Bings, J.A.C. Broekaert, Comparison of the cold vapor TE generation using NaBH4 and SnCl2 as reducing agents and atomic emission spectrometry for the determination of Hg with a microstrip microwave induced argon plasma exiting from the CE P wafer, Microchim. Acta, 161 (2008) 175-184 [19] N. Bansal, J. Vaughan, A. Boullemant, T. Leong, Determination of total mercury in AC bauxite and bauxite residue by flow injection cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry, Microchem. J., 113 (2014) 36-41 [20] C.F. Harrington, S.A. Merson, T.M.D. D' Silva, Method to reduce the memory effect of mercury in the analysis of fish tissue using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta, 505 (2004) 247-254 [21] A. Woller, H. Garraud, F. Martin, O.F.X. Donard, P. Fodor, Determination of total mercury in sediments by microwave-assisted digestion-flow injection-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 12 (1997) 53-56 33 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [22] J. Allibone, E. Fatemian, P.J. Walker, Determination of mercury in potable water by ICP- T MS using gold as a stabilising agent, J. Anal. Atom. Spectrom., 14 (1999) 235-239 IP [23] R. Liu, M. Xu, Z. Shi, J. Zhang, Y. Gao, L. Yang, Determination of total mercury in biological tissue by isotope dilution ICP-MS after UV photochemical vapor generation, SC R Talanta, 117 (2013) 371-375. [24] H. Pietila, P. Peramaki, J. Piispanen, L. Majuri, M. Starr, T. Nieminen, M. Kantola, L. NU Ukonmaanaho, Determination of methylmercury in humic-rich natural water samples using N2-distillation with isotope dilution and on-line purge and trap GC-ICP-MS, Microchem. J., MA 112 (2014) 113-118. [25] E. Vassileva, I. Wysocka, M. Betti, Reference measurements for cadmium, copper, D mercury, lead, zinc and methylmercury mass fractions in scallop sample by isotope dilution TE inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Microchem. J., 116 (2014) 197-205. CE P [26] H. Pietila, P. Peramaki, J. Piispanen, L. Majuri, M. Starr, T. Nieminen, M. Kantola, L. Ukonmaanaho, Determination of methyl mercury in humic-rich natural water samples using N-2-distillation with isotope dilution and on-line purge and trap GC-ICP-MS, Microchem. J., AC 112 (2014) 113-118 [27] C.P. Braga, A.C. Bittarello, C.C.F. Padilha, A.L. Leite, P.M. Moraes, M.A.R. Buzalaf, L.F. Zara, P.M. Padilha, Mercury fractionation in dourada (Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii) of the Madeira River in Brazil using metalloproteomic strategies, Talanta, 132 (2015) 239–244. [28] A. de Jesus, R.E. Sturgeon, J.X. Liu, M.M. Silva, Determination of mercury in gasoline by photochemical vapor generation coupled to graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, Microchem. J., 117 (2014) 100-105 34 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [29] D. Martín-Yerga, M.B. González-García, A. Costa-García, Electrochemical determination T of mercury: A review, Talanta, 116 (2013) 1091-1104. IP [30] E. Witkowska, K. Szczepaniak, M. Biziuk, Some applications of neutron activation SC R analysis: A review, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 265 (2005) 141 – 150. [31] R.R. Greenberg, P. Bode, E.A.D.N. Fernandes, Neutron activation analysis: A primary NU method of measurement, Spectrochim. Acta, B 66 (2011) 193 – 241. [32] S.J.M. Butala, L.P. Scanlan, S.N. Chaudhuri, A detailed study of thermal decomposition, MA amalgamation/atomic absorption spectrophotometry methodology for the quantitative analysis of mercury in fish and hair, J. Food Protect. 69 (2006) 2720-2728. D [33] M.J. da Silva, A.P.S. Paim, M.F. Pimentel, M.L. Cervera, M. de la Guardia, Determination TE of total mercury in nuts at ultratrace level, Anal. Chim. Acta, 838 (2014) 13-19. CE P [34] I. Ipolyi, P. Massanisso, S. Sposato, P. Fodor, R. Morabito, Concentration levels of total and methylmercury in mussel samples collected along the coasts of Sardinia Island (Italy), AC Anal. Chim. Acta, 505 (2004) 145–151. [35] A. Ikem, N.O. Egiebor, Assessment of trace elements in canned fishes (mackerel, tuna, salmon, sardines and herrings) marketed in Georgia and Alabama (United States of America), J. Food Compos. Anal., 18 (2005) 771-787. [36] G. Carbonell, J.C. Bravo, C. Fernandez, J.V. Tarazona, A New Method for Total Mercury and Methyl Mercury Analysis in Muscle of Seawater Fish, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 83 (2009) 210-213. 35 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [37] C.F. Tsaiab, D.Y.C. Shiha, Y.T. Shyub, Survey of total mercury in foods from Taiwan containing red mould rice (Monascus) using a direct mercury analyser (DMA), Food Addit. IP T Contam. B, 3 (2010) 84-89. [38] C. Martins, E. Vasco, E. Paixao, P. Alvito, Total mercury in infant food, occurrence and SC R exposure assessment in Portugal, Food Addit. Contam., B 6 (2013) 151-157. [39] D.P. Torres, M.B. Martins-Teixeira, Method development for the control determination NU of mercury in seafood by solid-sampling thermal decomposition amalgamation atomic MA absorption spectrometry (TDA AAS), Food Addit. Contam., B 29 (2012) 625-632. [40] H.P. Vieira, C.C. Nascentes, C.C. Windmoller, Development and comparison of two analytical methods to quantify the mercury content in honey, J. Food Compos. Anal., 34 TE D (2014) 1-6. [41] S.L.C. Ferreira, M. Miro, E.G.P. da Silva, G.D. Matos, P.S. dos Reis, G.C. Brandao, W.N.L. CE P dos Santos, A.T. Duarte, M.G.R. Vale, R.G.O. Araujo, Slurry sampling—An analytical strategy for the determination of metals and metalloids by spectroanalytical techniques, Appl. AC Spectrosc. Rev., 45 (2010) 44 – 62. [42] S.R. Segade, J.F. Tyson, Determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in water samples by slurry sampling cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry in a flow injection system after preconcentration on silica C18 modified, Talanta, 71 (2007) 1696-1702. [43] M.L. Lin, Determination of As, Cd, Hg and Pb in herbs using slurry sampling electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Food Chem., 141 (2013) 2158-2162. 36 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [44] Y.Z. Yi, S.J. Jiang, A.C. Sahayam, Palladium nanoparticles as the modifier for the determination of Zn, As, Cd, Sb, Hg and Pb in biological samples by ultrasonic slurry sampling T electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Anal. At. IP Spectrom., 27 (2012) 426-431. SC R [45] S.Y. Huang, S.J. Jiang, 8-Hydroxyquinoline-5-sulfonic acid as the modifier for the determination of trace elements in cereals by slurry sampling electrothermal vaporization NU ICP-MS, Anal. Methods., 2 (2010) 1310-1315. [46] P.C. Li, S.J. Jiang, Electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma-mass MA spectrometry for the determination of Cr, Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb in rice flour, Anal. Chim. Acta, 495 (2003) 143-150. D [47] F.Y. Chen, S.J. Jiang, Slurry Sampling Flow Injection Chemical Vapor Generation TE Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of As, Cd, and Hg in CE P Cereals, J. Agr. Food Chem., 57 (2009) 6564-6569. [48] P. Cava-Montesinos, E. Rodenes-Torralba, A. Morales-Rubio, M.L. Cervera, M. de la Guardia, Cold vapour atomic fluorescence determination of mercury in milk by slurry AC sampling using multicommutation, Anal. Chim. Acta, 506 (2004) 145-153. [49] S.R. Segade, J.F. Tyson, Evaluation of two flow injection systems for mercury speciation analysis in fish tissue samples by slurry sampling cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 18 (2003) 268-273. [50] S.F. Chen, S.J. Jiang, Determination of arsenic, selenium and mercury in fish samples by slurry sampling electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 13 (1998) 673-677. [51] J. Sysalova, J. Kucera, M. Fikrle, B. Drtinova, Determination of the total mercury in contaminated soils by direct solid sampling atomic absorption spectrometry using an AMA37 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 254 device and radiochemical neutron activation analysis, Microchem. J., 110 (2013) 691- T 694. IP [52] H. Zelinkova, R. Cervenka, J. Komarek, Stabilizing Agents for Calibration in the Determination of Mercury Using Solid Sampling Electrothermal Atomic Absorption SC R Spectrometry, Sci. World J. Article ID 439875 (2012) 1-7. [53] R.G.O. Araujo, F. Vignola, I.N.B. Castilho, D.L.G. Borges, B. Welz, M.G.R. Vale, P. NU Smichowski, S.L.C. Ferreira, H. Becker-Ross, Determination of mercury in airborne particulate matter collected on glass fiber filters using high-resolution continuum source graphite MA furnace atomic absorption spectrometry and direct solid sampling, Spectrochim. Acta B, 66 (2011) 378-382. D [54] M. Resano, J. Briceno, M.A. Belarra, Direct determination of Hg in polymers by solid TE sampling-graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry: A comparison of the performance of line source and continuum source instrumentation, Spectrochim. Acta B, 64 CE P (2009) 520-529 SI. [55] A.F. da Silva, F.G. Lepri, D.L.G. Borges, B. Welz, A.J. Curtius, U. Heitmann, Determination AC of mercury in biological samples using solid sampling high-resolution continuum source electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry with calibration against aqueous standards, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 21 (2006) 1321-1326. [56] M. Resano, I. Gelaude, R. Dams, F. Vanhaecke, Solid sampling–electrothermal vaporization–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the direct determination of Hg in different materials using isotope dilution with a gaseous phase for calibration, Spectrochim. Acta B, 60 (2005) 319-326. 38 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [57] K.H. Grobecker, A. Detcheva, Validation of mercury determination by solid sampling Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometry and a specially designed furnace, Talanta, 70 IP T (2006) 962-965. [58] A. Detcheva K.H. Grobecker, Determination of Hg, Cd, Mn, Pb and Sn in seafood by solid SC R sampling Zeeman atomic absorption spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta B, 61 (2006) 454-459. [59] J. Naozuka C.S. Nomura, Total determination and direct chemical speciation of Hg in fish NU by solid sampling GF AAS, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 26 (2011) 2257-2262. MA [60] S.C. Foo, T.C. Tan, Elements in the hair of South-east Asian islanders, Sci. Total Envirom., 209 (1998) 185-192. D [61] K. Araujo, M. Colina, R. Mazurek, J. Delgado, H. Ledo, E. Gutierrez, L. Herrera, Mercury TE determination by CV-AAS in wastewater and sewage sludge from a stabilization pond CE P system, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 355 (1996) 319-320. [62] S.L.C. Ferreira, L.O.B. Silva, F.A. de Santana, M.M.S. Junior, G.D. Matos, W.N.L. dos Santos, A review of reflux systems using cold finger for sample preparation in the AC determination of volatile elements, Microchem. J., 106 (2013) 307-310. [63] R.M. de Jesus, M.M.S. Junior, G.D. Matos, A.M.P. dos Santos, S.L.C. Ferreira, Validation of a digestion system using a digester block/cold finger system for the determination of lead in vegetable foods by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry, J. AOAC Int., 94 (2011) 942-946. [64] M.B. Dessuy, R.M. de Jesus, G.C. Brandao, S.L.C. Ferreira, M.G.R. Vale, B. Welz, Food Addit. Contam. A, 30 (2013) 202-207. 39 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [65] E.V. Silva, S.M. Sella, E.C. Spinola, I.R. Santos, W. Machado, L.D. Lacerda, Mercury, zinc, manganese, and iron accumulation in leachate pond sediments from a refuse tip in IP T Southeastern Brazil, Microchem. J., 82 (2006) 196-200. [66] E.Q. Oreste, R.M. de Oliveira, A.M. Nunes, M.A. Vieira, A.S. Ribeiro, Sample preparation SC R methods for determination of Cd, Pb and Sn in meat samples by GFAAS: use of acid digestion associated with a cold finger apparatus versus solubilization methods, Anal. Methods, 5 NU (2013) 1590-1595. [67] A.C.D. Pinheiro, M.T. Lisboa, A.S. Ribeiro, A.M. Nunes, A. Yamasaki, Evaluation of rice MA sample mineralization using a reflux system for determination of Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn by FAAS, Quim. Nova, 37 (2014) 6-9. D [68] E.V. Silva-Filho, S.M. Sella, E.C. Spinola, I.R. Santos, W. Machado, L.D. Lacerda, Mercury, TE zinc, manganese, and iron accumulation in leachate pond sediments from a refuse tip in CE P Southeastern Brazil, Microchem. J., 82 (2006) 196-200. [69] E.Q. Oreste, A. de Jesus, R.M. de Oliveira, M.M. da Silva, M.A. Vieira, A.S. Ribeiro, New design of cold finger for sample preparation in open system: Determination of Hg in AC biological samples by CV-AAS, Microchem. J., 109 (2013) 5-9 SI. [70] F.V.M. Pontes, M.C. Carneiro, D.S Vaitsman, M.I.C. Monteiro, A.A. Neto, M.L.B. Tristao, M.F. Guerrante, Comparative study of sample decomposition methods for the determination of total Hg in crude oil and related products, Fuel Process. Technol., 106 (2013) 122-126. [71]. L.H. Reyes, J.L.G. Mar, A. Hernández-Ramírez, J.M. Peralta-Hernández, J.M.A. Barbosa, H.M.S. Kingston, Microwave assited extraction for mercury speciation analysis. Microchim. Acta, 172 (2011) 3-14. 40 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [72]. Y. Gao, Z.M. Shi, Z. Long, P. Wu, C.B. Zheng, X.D. Hou, Determination and speciation of mercury in environmental and biological samples by analytical atomic spectrometry, IP T Microchem. J., 103 (2012) 1-14. [73] S.S. Chen, S.S. Chou, D.F. Hwang, Determination of methylmercury in fish using focused SC R microwave digestion following by Cu2+ addition, sodium tetrapropylborate derivatization, nheptane extraction, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A, 1024 NU (2004) 209 - 215. [74] M. Tuzen, Toxic and essential trace elemental contents in fish species from the Black MA Sea, Turkey, Food Chem. Toxicol., 47 (2009) 1785 - 1790 [75] L.A. de Paz, A. Alegria, R. Barbera, R. Farre, M.J. Lagarda, Determination of mercury in D dry fish samples by microwave digestion and flow injection analysis system cold vapor TE atomic absorption spectrometry, Food Chem., 58 (1997) 169-172. CE P [76] S.C. Hight, J. Cheng, Determination of total mercury in seafood by cold vapor-atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS) after microwave decomposition, Food Chem., 91 (2005) AC 557–570. [77] L.R. Drennan-Harris, S. Wongwilawan, J.F. Tyson, Trace determination of total mercury in rice by conventional inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 28 (2013) 259-265. [78]. L. Carrasco, E. Vassileva, Determination of methylmercury in marine biota samples: Method validation, Talanta, 122 (2014) 106 - 114. [79] M.A. Morgano, L.C. Rabonato, R.F. Milani, L. Miyagusku, K.D. Quintaes, As, Cd, Cr, Pb and Hg in seafood species used for sashimi and evaluation of dietary exposure, Food control, 36 (2014) 24 – 29. 41 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [80] M. Kosanovic, A. Adem, M. Jokanovic, Y. M. Abdulrazzaq, Simultaneous Determination of Cadmium, Mercury, Lead, Arsenic, Copper, and Zinc in Human Breast Milk by IP T ICP‐MS/Microwave Digestion, Anal. Lett., 41 (2008) 406 – 416. SC R [81] L.R. da Cunha, T.H.M. da Costa, E.D. Caldas, Mercury Concentration in Breast Milk and Infant Exposure Assessment During the First 90 Days of Lactation in a Midwestern Region of NU Brazil, Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 151 (2013) 30 – 37. [82] R. Koplik, I. Klimesova, K. Malisova, O. Mestek, Determination of Mercury Species in MA Foodstuffs using LC-ICP-MS: the Applicability and Limitations of the Method, Czech. J. Food Sci., 32 (2014) 249 -259. [83] D.L. Qin, Dongli, Z.X. Chen, H.T. Wang, J.W. Zhao, Z.B. Mou, Determination of Total D Mercury in Fish from Amur and Ussuri River of China by Microwave Digestion-ICP/MS TE Method, Asian J. Chem. , 25 (2013) 3665 - 3667. CE P [84] Y.Q. Zhao, J.P. Zheng, L. Fang, Q. Lin, Y.N. Wu, Z.M. Xue, F.F. Fu, Speciation analysis of mercury in natural water and fish samples by using capillary electrophoresis-inductively AC coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Talanta, 89 (2012) 280 - 285. [85] L.H. Reyes, G.M.M. Rahman, T. Fahrenholz, H.M.S. Kingston, Comparison of methods with respect to efficiencies, recoveries, and quantitation of mercury species interconversions in food demonstrated using tuna fish, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 390 (2008) 2123-2132. [86]. L.H. Reyes, G.M.M. Rahman, H.M.S. Kingston, Robust microwave-assisted extraction protocol for determination of total mercury and methylmercury in fish tissues, Anal. Chim. Acta, 631 (2009) 121-128. 42 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [87] O.A. Tyutyunnik, M.L. Getsina, E.S. Toropchenova, I.V. Kubrakova, Microwave preparation of natural samples to the determination of mercury and other toxic elements by IP T atomic absorption spectrometry, J. Anal. Chem., 68 (2013) 377-385 [88] L. Noel, J.C. Leblanc, T. Guerin, Determination of several elements in duplicate meals SC R from catering establishments using closed vessel microwave digestion with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection: estimation of daily dietary intake, Food Addit. NU Contam., 20 (2003) 44-56 [89] L. Noel, V. Dufailly, N. Lemahieu, C. Vastel, T. Guerin, Simultaneous analysis of cadmium, MA lead, mercury, and arsenic content in foodstuffs of animal origin by inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry after closed vessel microwave digestion: Method validation, J. D AOAC Int., 88 (2005) 1811-1821. TE [90] M. Kim, Mercury, cadmium and arsenic contents of calcium dietary supplements, Food CE P Addit. Contam., 21 (2004) 763-767 [91] L.R. da Cunha, T.H.M. da Costa, E.D. Caldas, Mercury Concentration in Breast Milk and Infant Exposure Assessment During the First 90 Days of Lactation in a Midwestern Region of AC Brazil, Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 151 (2013) 30-37. [92] J. Djedjibegovic, T. Larssen, A. Skrbo, A. Marjanovic, M. Sober, Contents of cadmium, copper, mercury and lead in fish from the Neretva river (Bosnia and Herzegovina) determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), Food Chem., 131 (2012) 469-476. [93] D.G. da Silva, L.A. Portugal, A.M. Serra, S.L.C. Ferreira, V. Cerda, Determination of mercury in rice by MSFIA and cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry, Food Chem., 137 (2013) 159-163. 43 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [94] M.J. da Silva, A.P.S. Palm, M.F. Pimentel, M.L. Cervera, M. de la Guardia, Determination of mercury in rice by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry after microwave-assisted IP T digestion, Anal. Chim. Acta, 667 (2010) 43-48. [95] S. Landi, F. Fagioli, C. Locatelli, R. Vecchietti, Digestion method for the determination of SC R mercury in vegetable matrices by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry, Analyst, 115 (1990) 173 - 177. NU [96]S. Landi, F. Fagioli, C. Locatelli, Determination of total mercury in seafood and other MA protein-rich products, J. AOAC Int., 75 (1992) 1023 - 1028. [97] D. Fabbri, G. Gabbianelli, C. Locatelli, D. Lubrano, C. Trombini, I. Vassura, Distribution of TE Soil Pol, 129 (2001) 143 – 153. D mercury and other heavy metals in core sediments of the northern Adriatic sea, Water Air [98] C. Locatelli, D. Melucci, Voltammetric method for ultra-trace determination of total CE P mercury and toxic metals in vegetables. Comparison with spectroscopy, Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 11 (2013) 790 - 800. AC [99] D. Melucci, M. Locatelli, C. Locatelli, Trace level voltammetric determination of heavy metals and total mercury in tea matrices (Camellia sinensis), Food Chem. Toxicol. 62 (2013) 901 – 907. [100] C. Locatelli, D. Melucci, Voltammetric determination of ultra-trace total mercury and toxic metals in meals, Food Chem., 130 (2012) 460 – 466. [101] C. Locatelli, Mutual interference problems in the simultaneous voltammetric determination of trace total mercury(II) in presence of copper(II) at gold electrode. Applications to environmental matrices, Anal. Methods, 2 (2010) 1784 – 1791. 44 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [102] D. Melucci, S. Montalbani, C. Locatelli, Optimization of analytical procedures for the simultaneous voltammetric determination of total Hg(II) in presence of Cu(II) in IP T environmental matrices, Cent. Eur. J. Chem., 10 (2012) 267 - 276. [103] V. Singh, A.N. Garg, Availability of essential trace elements in Indian cereals, vegetables SC R and spices using INAA and the contribution of spices to daily dietary intake, Food Chem., 94 (2006) 81 - 89. NU [104] A. Rizzo, M. Arcagni, M.A. Arribere, D. Bubach, S. Ribeiro Guevara, Mercury in the biotic compartments of Northwest Patagonia lakes, Argentina, Chemosphere, 84 (2011) 70 – MA 79. [105] D.L. Anderson, Effect of L-cysteine on drying and neutron irradiation loss of Hg, Se, As, TE D and Br from fish tissue, J. Food Compos. Anal., 28 (2012) 88 – 98. [106] J.M.R. Antoine, L.A.H. Fung, C. N. Grant, H.T. Dennis, G.C. Lalor, Dietary intake of (2012) 111 – 121. CE P minerals and trace elements in rice on the Jamaican market, J. Food Compos. Anal., 26 AC [107] C.C. Muller, A.L.H. Muller, C. Pirola, F.A. Duarte, E.M.M. Flores, E.I. Muller, Feasibility of nut digestion using single reaction chamber for further trace element determination by ICP-OES, Microchem. J., 116 (2014) 255 - 260. [108] J.S. Barin, J.S.F. Pereira, P.A. Mello, C.L. Knorr, D.P. Moraes, M.F. Mesko, J.A. Nobrega, M.G.A. Korn, E.M.M. Flores, Focused microwave-induced combustion for digestion of botanical samples and metals determination by ICP OES and ICP-MS, Talanta, 94 (2012) 308314. 45 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [109] L. Schmidt, C.A. Bizzi, F.A. Duarte, V.L. Dressler, E.M.M. Flores, Evaluation of drying conditions of fish tissues for inorganic mercury and methylmercury speciation analysis, IP T Microchem. J., 108 (2013) 53 – 59. [110] R.S. Picoloto, H. Wiltsche, G. Knapp, J.S. Barin, E.M.M. Flores, Mercury determination SC R in soil by CVG-ICP-MS after volatilization using microwave-induced combustion, Anal. Methods, 4 (2012) 630-636. NU [111] F.G. Antes, F.A. Duarte, M.F. Mesko, M. A. G. Nunes, V. A. Pereira, E. I. Mueller, V. L. Dressler, E. M.M. Flores, Determination of toxic elements in coal by ICP-MS after digestion MA using microwave-induced combustion, Talanta, 83 (2010) 364 - 369. [112] L. Schmidt, C.A. Bizzi, F.A. Duarte, V.L. Dressler, E.M.M. Flores, Evaluation of drying TE Microchem j., 108 (2013) 53 - 59. D conditions of fish tissues for inorganic mercury and methylmercury speciation analysis, CE P [113] M.H. Mashhadizadeh, M. Amoli-Diva, M.R. Shapouri, H. Afruzi, Solid phase extraction of trace amounts of silver, cadmium, copper, mercury, and lead in various food samples based on ethylene glycol bis-mercaptoacetate modified 3-(trimethoxysilyl)-1-propanethiol AC coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles, Food Chem., 151 (2014) 300 - 305. [114] V.A. Lemos, L.O. dos Santos, A new method for preconcentration and determination of mercury in fish, shellfish and saliva by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry, Food Chem., 149 (2014) 203 - 207. [115] L. Adlnasab, H. Ebrahimzadeh, A.A. Asgharinezhad, M.N. Aghdam, A. Dehghani, S. Esmaeilpour, A Preconcentration Procedure for Determination of Ultra-Trace Mercury (II) in Environmental Samples Employing Continuous-Flow Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, Food Anal. Method, 7 (2014) 616 - 628. 46 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [116] M. Hossien-poor-Zaryabi, M. Chamsaz, T. Heidari, M.H.A. Zavar, M. Behbahani, M. Salarian, Application of Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Micro-extraction Using Mean Centering of T Ratio Spectra Method for Trace Determination of Mercury in Food and Environmental IP Samples, Food Anal. Method, 7 (2014) 352 - 359. SC R [117] P.M. Moraes, F.A. Santos, B. Cavecci, C.C.F. Padilha, J.C.S. Vieira, P.S. Roldan, P.D.M. Padilha, GFAAS determination of mercury in muscle samples of fish from Amazon, Brazil, NU Food Chem., 141 (2013) 2614 - 2617. [118] A.Q. Shah, T.G. Kazi, J.A. Baig, H.I. Afridi, M.B. Arain, Simultaneously determination of MA methyl and inorganic mercury in fish species by cold vapour generation atomic absorption spectrometry, Food Chem., 134 (2012) 2345 - 2349. D [119] M. Ruiz-de-Cenzano, A. Rochina-Marco, M. Luisa Cervera, M. de la Guardia, Speciation TE of methylmercury in market seafood by thermal degradation, amalgamation and atomic CE P absorption spectroscopy, Ecotox. Environ. Safe., 107 (2014) 90 - 96. [120] L.O. Dos Santos, V.A. Lemos, Development of an On-line Preconcentration System for AC Determination of Mercury in Environmental Samples, Water air soil poll., 225 (2014) 2086. [121] M.A. Goudarzi, P. Parsaei, F. Nayebpour, E. Rahimi, Determination of mercury, cadmium and lead in human milk in Iran, Toxicol. Ind. Health, 29 (2013) 820 – 823. [122] V. Romero, I. Costas-Mora, I. Lavilla, C. Bendicho, Cold vapor-solid phase microextraction using amalgamation in different Pd-based substrates combined with direct thermal desorption in a modified absorption cell for the determination of Hg by atomic absorption spectrometry, Spectrochim Acta B, 66 (2011) 156-162 [123] X. Yuan, G. Yang, Y. Ding, X.M. Li, X.F. Zhan, Z.J. Zhao, Y.X. Duan, An effective analytical system based on a pulsed direct current microplasma source for ultra-trace mercury 47 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT determination using gold amalgamation cold vapor atomic emission spectrometry, Spectrochim Acta B, 93 (2014) 1-7 T [124] P. Rivaro, C. Ianni, F. Soggia, R. Frache, Mercury speciation in environmental samples IP by cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry with in situ preconcentration on a gold trap, SC R Microchim. Acta, 158 (2007) 345-352 [125] E.L.M. Flores, J.N.G. Paniz, E.M.M. Flores, D. Pozebon, V.L. Dressler, Mercury NU Speciation in Urban Landfill Leachate by Cold Vapor Generation Atomic Absorption Spectrometry using Ion Exchange and Amalgamation, J Brazil Chem Soc, 20 (2009) 1659- MA 1666 [126] J.V. Cizdziel, T.A. Hinners, E.M. Heithmar, Determination of total mercury in fish tissues D using combustion atomic absorption spectrometry with gold amalgamation, Water Air Soil TE Poll., 135 (2002) 355-370 CE P [127] T. Frentiu, A.I. Mihaltan, E. Darvasi, M. Ponta, C. Roman, M. Frentiu, A novel analytical system with a capacitively coupled plasma microtorch and a gold filament microcollector for the determination of total Hg in water by cold vapour atomic emission spectrometry, J. Anal. AC Atom. Spectrom., 27 (2012) 1753-1760 [128] S. Halbach, G. Welzl, In-situ measurements of low-level mercury vapor exposure from dental amalgam with Zeeman atomic absorption spectroscopy, Toxicol. Mech. Method, 14 (2004) 293-299 [129] K. Leopold, M. Foulkes, P.I. Worsfold, Preconcentration techniques for the determination of mercury species in natural waters, Trac-Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 28 (2009) 426 - 435 48 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [130] A.M. Carro, M.C. Mejuto, Application of chromatographic and electrophoretic methodology to the speciation of organomercury compounds in food analysis, J. IP T Chromatogr. A, 882 (2000) 283 - 307. [131] V.L. Dressler, C.M.M. Santos, F.G. Antes, F.R.S. Bentlin, D. Pozebon, E.M.M. Flores, SC R Total Mercury, Inorganic Mercury and Methyl Mercury Determination in Red Wine, Food Anal. Meth., 5 (2012) 505 - 511. NU [132] M. Ruiz-de-Cenzano, A. Rochina-Marco, M.L. Cervera, M. de la Guardia, Speciation of methylmercury in market seafood by thermal degradation, amalgamation and atomic MA absorption spectroscopy, Ecotox. Environ. Safe., 107 (2014) 90 - 96. [133] F.A. Duarte, C.A. Bizzi, F.G. Antes, V.L. Dressler, E.M.D. Flores, Organic, inorganic and D total mercury determination in fish by chemical vapor generation with collection on a gold TE gauze and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta B, 64 (2009) CE P 513 - 519. [134] L. Schmidt, C.A. Bizzi, F.A. Duarte, V.L. Dressler, E.M.M. Flores, Evaluation of drying conditions of fish tissues for inorganic mercury and methylmercury speciation analysis, AC Microchem. J., 108 (2013) 53 - 59. [135] G.L. Qiu, X.B. Feng, P. Li, S.F. Wang, G.H. Li, L.H. Shang, X.W. Fu, Methylmercury accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown at abandoned mercury mines in Guizhou, China, J. Agric. Food Chem., 56 (2008) 2465 - 2468. [136] B.L. Batista, J.L., Rodrigues, S.S. de Souza, V.C.O. Souza, F. Barbosa, Mercury speciation in seafood samples by LC-ICP-MS with a rapid ultrasound-assisted extraction procedure: Application to the determination of mercury in Brazilian seafood samples, Food Chem., 126 (2011) 2000 - 2004. 49 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [137] M. Prodana, A. Murariu, A. Meghea, I. Demetrescu, Biomonitoring as assessment of human exposure to heavy metals. Speciation of Hg in fish food and impact on human health, IP T Mater. Res. Innov., 13 (2009) 409 - 412. [138] T. Kuballa, E. Leonhardt, K. Schoeberl, D.W. Lachenmeier, Determination of SC R methylmercury in fish and seafood using optimized digestion and derivatization followed by gas chromatography with atomic emission detection, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 228 (2009) NU 425 - 431. [139] S.C. Hight, J. Cheng, Determination of methylmercury and estimation of total mercury MA in seafood using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS): Method development and validation, Anal. Chim. Acta, D 567 (2006) 160 - 172. TE [140] A. Montero-Alvarez, M.D.F. de la Campa, A. Sanz-Medel, Mercury speciation in Cuban commercial edible fish by HPLC-ICP-MS using the double spike isotope dilution analysis CE P strategy, Int. j. Environ. An. Ch., 94 (2014) 36 - 47. [141] Z. Huang, X.D. Pan, J.L. Han, P.G. Wu, J. Tang, Y. Tan, Determination of methylmercury 187. AC in marine fish from coastal areas of Zhejiang, China, Food Addit. Contam. B, 5 (2012) 182 - 50