Uploaded by Ron Simon

New DOC Document

advertisement
lConjuring Act
Nearly 60 years ago, Weldon Kees vanished without a trace. Why is Kathleen Rooney summoning him
today?
BY JAMES REIDEL
Weldon Kees and Kathleen Rooney. (Rooney photo by Beth Rooney.)
Weldon Kees has been gone close to 60 years, but he continues to inspire. The Nebraska-born poet,
who also wrote fiction, composed jazz, and produced experimental films, is the animating spirit
behind Kathleen Rooney’s book Robinson Alone (Gold Wake Press, 2012). In her new collection,
Rooney pays homage to Kees’s best-known work, the four Robinson poems that he published before
disappearing in July 1955. (His car was discovered in a parking lot near the Golden Gate Bridge, his
body never found.) James Reidel, author of Vanished Act: The Life and Art of Weldon Kees (University
of Nebraska Press, 2003), interviewed Rooney for the Poetry Foundation. They spoke about why Kees
is an invitational writer, what Nickelodeon has to do with poetry, and the aesthetic elegance of
disappearance.
Robinson was considered a doppelgänger of Kees, an urban and urbane Robinson Crusoe. Why write
an entire book of post-Robinson poems?
The Robinson series is onmmvbmvbmvmme of Kees’s projects that I would have liked to read more of,
but there isn’t any more. Not to say that the four poems aren’t “enough” or that the series feels
“unfinished”—if anything, I admire Kees’s economy—but I really love the poems and their mysterious,
quasi-alter ego, and I wanted to see the story continue. One of the poems in Robinson Alone
concludes with the couplet “Incompletion makes people / want to fill your blanks in.” The impulse to
create, I think, often comes from this feeling, even if it’s not always as direct as it is in the case of my
post-Robinson poems. Probably a lot of writers could tell you vivid and specific stories of the writers
they read who struck or inspired them in such a way as to make them want to create their own work;
I think of these writers as not just “inspirational” but “invitational”—like what they’re doing is an
invitation to try to do it yourself. Kees is an invitational writer for me.
An example of this invitajllltional phenomenon that sticks with me is from an episode of the
Nickelodeon kids’ show The Adventures of Pete & Pete, which I watched all the time growing up.
Little Pete is on his way to school, and he passes a garage band that happens to be rehearsing a song
that he falls head over heels for. He can’t get it out of his mind, but when he comes back later, the
band has disappeared. Ultimately, Pete realizes that the only solution (in the absence of ever finding
the band again) is to start his own band and make his own songs. The Robinson poems are like that to
me.
I am with you on “incompletion.” As his biographer, a title and task that grew on me slowly, I found an
enormous blank to fill. And we’re not the only ones who keep inserting things into this Kees void.
Donald Justice wrote “Sestina on Six Words by Weldon Kees” in Gainesville, Florida, while Kees was
still alive in San Francisco’s Mission District. Justice said that he had planned to send the completed
poem to Kees himself, but by the time it was published, it was too late.
Much poetry—and art in general—is addressed to an unknown audience: whoever will eventually
read or see it. But it’s also interesting when things are addressed to impossible audiences: people
who can never see the work no matter what. The poetic convention of the apostrophe comes from
these circumstances, obviously. Justice’s poem isn’t actually addressed to Kees, of course, but it’s
significant that he wanted to show it to Kees.
You can get some appealing effects by just imagining the absent poet as part of the audience. This
conceptual approach is what Brian Eno might call an “oblique strategy,” and it can be generative:
although I think a lot about what Kees would have made of my Robinson poems, and I want to think
he would have liked them, they’re not addressed to him, and, furthermore, he’s not even in them. I’m
borrowing his fictional creation and reimagining his own life through that character.
I find the biography you wrote—and the biographical info about Kees in general—to be fairly
sympathetic to its subject, but that may be because of his unsympathetic aspects. In an interview at
the end of her memoir The Chronology of Water, Lidia Yuknavitch says, “I’ve never met anyone who
hasn’t fucked up in their life a time or two. Royally. I’m pretty sure that’s what keeps us connected to
one another,” and I’m inclined to agree. In much the same way, I suppose, that incompleteness
engages the imagination, imperfection and fallibility make people more human, more like individuals
we’d actually want to know. Perfect, or perfectly successful, people are not so interesting, not so
instructive.
For some poets who discover Kees’s work, he’s like finding—having—an imaginary friend. I remember
how Justice said there was this pleasure in discovering Kees for yourself. I had that experience in a big
way, but I would fear, too, that my biography might spoil this discovery. I don’t think so with your
book. We have poets possessed by Kees and possessing Kees—for you; for Larry Levis in his homage
to Kees’s “fabulous touch”; for David Wojahn, imagining Kees in Mexico living with a pretty, Frida
Kahlo–like ingénue in “Weldon Kees in Mexico, 1966”; for Simon Armitage, channeling himself via the
agency of Robinson. Indeed, Kees is both discovered and still missing—liminal in that way. He played
with liminality too; there is his frequently anthologized “For My Daughter,” that liminal daughter
whom he both beautifully and terrifyingly has. Are we playing with Kees’s Robinson doll, or is he
playing with ours?
Kees as a playful poet is something that I feel a connection with and is what drew me to his work
initially. Because of his mysterious end, there is a temptation to read his work and life in a singularly
gloomy light, but his poems are very often a ton of fun, and it seems as though he personally would
have been—not all the time, but sometimes—too. To apply an ugly-sounding (to my ear) but apt
word to his poetic style, Kees’s writing is ludic—it feels like a serious game that he is very good at and
is having a good time playing. The poem that you mention, “For My Daughter,” is a bitter poem, but
it’s also a fake-out—a trick—and I say that with admiration. So to answer your question about who
possesses Kees/Robinson: Games consist of the change of possession. Name a sport that involves a
ball, and the game probably consists of the ball being passed; that’s the game. And in literature—and
maybe art in general—almost anything of value gains its value by being passed on. Kees started the
game, and I’m still playing.
Let’s turn to the game. I see you’ve versified some of Kees’s letters and interpolated these centos in
your book. I can see why. Kees wrote really good letters. Some passages of his correspondence are
epistolary prose poems. I actually tried to compose my own cento from a letter Kees wrote from
California in January 1951. Do you think Kees wrote them knowing that one day they would be read
by strangers, biographers, poets? What’s amusing to me is that the man who edited his letters,
Robert Knoll, called Kees a solipsist, the kind of person who might not care if we exist or not.
I’m not familiar with Knoll’s justification for terming Kees a solipsist, but it seems worth mentioning
that at least one of Kees’s Robinson poems, “Robinson,” is animated by a horror of solipsism: the idea
that things disappear when you’re not there to look at them. As to whether he thought anyone
besides their explicit recipients would read his letters, I suspect it would depend on when you asked
him. There were likely times that he felt (despairingly) that nobody would care at all about anything
he wrote, letters or otherwise, and other times that he probably had grandiose notions about being
read by some kind of “posterity.” The sense that you get when you encounter a piece of ostensibly
private correspondence that feels as highly crafted as Kees’s letters do is first that you’re in the
presence of someone who just loves and is skilled at language, but there is also this painful sense of
hope—a Who knows what kind of life this bunch of sentences is going to have once I turn it loose in
the world kind of feeling.
So that brings us somewhat full circle, to completion. I must ask you what I ask myself from a
cold-blooded biographer’s POV: Do you think that Kees, a careful poet, understood the bad form of
standing there hale and hearty beside the kind of poems he wrote? There is a kind of elegance to his
disappearance, an aesthetic if you will, that looks far less like the self-treatment with extreme
prejudice of, say Plath or Berryman. How does one survive writing like Kees?
The aesthetic elegance of Kees’s disappearance strikes me, too, certainly, hence the last poem in
Robinson Alone, including the lines “Preoccupation & a certain mode of self-presentation. / Even
when absent, Robinson has a style.” As for how one survives writing like Kees, one should probably
immediately try to write again in a style that is decidedly un-Keesian. Aside from collaborating with
my writing partner Elisa Gabbert, I’m taking a break from poems for a while and trying to focus on
writing a novel (though not a campus one, since Kees has one of those).
Originally Published: January 8th, 2013
James Reidel is the author of the poetry collections Jim's Book (Black Lawrence Press, 2013) and My
Window Seat for Arlena Twigg (Black Lawrence Press, 2006). He wrote the definitive and only
biography on Weldon Kees, Vanished Act: The Life and Work of Weldon Kees (University of Nebraska
Press, 2003), and edited 3 Entertertainments (Knives Forks...
Read Full Biography
RELATED CONTENT
RELATED PODCASTS
Asleep, But Not at Rest
RELATED POEMS
Aspects of Robinson
For My Daughter
Relating to Robinson
Robinson
Robinson at Home
RELATED AUTHORS
Weldon Kees
Kathleen Rooney
See All Related Content
AUDIO
Asleep, But Not at Rest
FROM POETRY OFF THE SHELFJanuary 2013
Kathleen Rooney on Weldon Kees and his mysterious poetic character Robinson
Read More
POEM
Aspects of Robinson
BY WELDON KEES
Robinson at cards at the Algonquin; a thin
Blue light comes down once more outside the blinds.
Gray men in overcoats are ghosts blown past the door.
The taxis streak the avenues with yellow, orange, and red.
This is Grand Central, Mr. Robinson.
Robinson on...
Read More
POEM
For My Daughter
BY WELDON KEES
Looking into my daughter’s eyes I read
Beneath the innocence of morning flesh
Concealed, hintings of death she does not heed.
Coldest of winds have blown this hair, and mesh
Of seaweed snarled these miniatures of hands;
The night’s slow poison, tolerant and bland,
Has moved...
Read More
AUTHOR
Weldon Kees
Weldon Kees was born in Beatrice, Nebraska and attended Doane College, the University of Missouri
and the University of Nebraska, earning his degree in 1935. In addition to writing, Kees...
Read More
POEM
Relating to Robinson
BY WELDON KEES
Somewhere in Chelsea, early summer;
And, walking in the twilight toward the docks,
I thought I made out Robinson ahead of me.
From an uncurtained second-story room, a radio
Was playing There’s a Small Hotel; a kite
Twisted above dark rooftops and slow drifting birds.
We...
Read More
POEM
Robinson
BY WELDON KEES