International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)
Volume 10, Issue 04, April 2019, pp. 1392-1401, Article ID: IJCIET_10_04_146
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=10&IType=04
ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316
© IAEME Publication
Scopus Indexed
VALUES-BASED ORIENTATIONS AS A FORMATION
FACTOR OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY
V. A. Ivashova
Associate Professor, Candidate of Sociological Science, Sociological Research and
Marketing Department, FSAEI HE «Stavropol State Agrarian University», Stavropol, Russia
V. N. Goncharov
Professor, Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, FSAEI HE «North Caucasus
Federal University», Stavropol, Russia
A.M. Erokhin
Professor, Doctor of Sociology, Head of Philosophy Department, FSAEI HE «North
Caucasus Federal University», Stavropol, Russia
O. U. Kolosova
Professor, Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Socio-economic and Humanitarian
Disciplines Stavropol branch of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of
Russia, Stavropol, Russia
L. A. Tronina
Professor, Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies SFEI HE
"Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute", Stavropol, Russia
O.N. Kamalova
Associated Professor, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Department of Philosophy,
FSBEI HE "Rostov State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian
Federation", Russia
ABSTRACT
The article presents the results of a study of the value orientations of specialists
with higher education working in the region and representing such professional
communities as IT specialists, mechanical engineers, food technologists, veterinarians
and financial economists. The analysis of the influence of value orientations on
attitudes to corporate social responsibility and within the boundaries of the
professional community has been carried out.
\http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1392
editor@iaeme.com
Values-Based Orientations as a Formation Factor of the Social Responsibility of the Professional
Community
Corporate social responsibility is considered as an indicator of the overall image
of the organization and an integral part of the corporate culture, which cannot be fully
realized in practice, if not shared by members of workers, production teams, formal
and, as a rule, informal leaders of which are specialists with higher education.
At the level of statistical observations the professional community’s understanding
of the importance of professional social responsibility with localization within specific
enterprises and a high status value is “own safety and the safety of others” and “wellbeing of loved ones” in the system of value orientations of professional communities of
the region was obtained.
The professional community of specialists describes at the level of competencies the
high significance of various types of social and professional responsibility;
accordingly, they are determined by their own professional activity and responsibility.
Key words: corporate social responsibility, value orientations, professional
community.
Cite this Article: V. A. Ivashova, V. N. Goncharov, A.M. Erokhin, O. U. Kolosova,
L. A. Tronina and O.N. Kamalova, Values-Based Orientations as a Formation Factor
of the Social Responsibility of the Professional Community. International Journal of
Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(04), 2019, pp. 1392-1401
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=10&IType=04
1. INTRODUCTION
Corporate social responsibility is a concept according to which organizations take into account
the interests of society, imposing responsibility for the impact of their activities on firms and
other interested parties in the public sphere. Corporate social responsibility is considered as an
indicator of the overall image of the organization, an integral part of the corporate culture,
which cannot be fully realized in practice, if not shared by members of workers, production
teams, formal and, as a rule, informal leaders of which are specialists with higher education [1,
2, 3, 4, 6].
The purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between the value orientations of
specialists and their attitude to issues of corporate social responsibility in the segmentation of
different professional communities: IT specialists, mechanical engineers, food technology
technologists, veterinarians and financial economists [7, 25, 9].
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
For modern organizations the image and brand of the organization is an essential factor of
competition. Practical expression of such work takes in actions aimed at promoting corporate
and social responsibility, as part of the overall image of the organization. Since a meaningful
image must find reinforcements in specific actions of personnel, it becomes more urgent to
focus the requirements of corporate culture on socially responsible actions of personnel. Such
studies are presented in the publications Utgård J. [24], Robinson S., Wood S. [18].
In order to inform the public about the activities of companies in the field of corporate
social responsibility, specialized reports are used that are publicly available through external
communication channels. The authors of Tsalis T.A., Stylianou M.S., Nikolaou I.E. in their
publication speak about improving the methodology of such reports [26]. The relevance of such
a research methodology reports helps managers and stakeholders to assess the best experience
of organizations in the field of increasing social responsibility of staff.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1393
editor@iaeme.com
V. A. Ivashova, V. N. Goncharov, A.M. Erokhin, O. U. Kolosova, L. A. Tronina and O.N.
Kamalova
Social responsibility of specialists should be formed during the period of vocational
training at the university. Such a position is especially actively promoted in the engineering,
medical, agrarian professional communities[5, 8, 10].
The authors of Ventres, W., Boelen, C., Haq, C. Express their conviction that social
responsibility must be an important part of institutional occupational identity [28]. In their
view, at the level of professional competence of medical workers, social responsibility should
manifest itself not only in knowledge, but also in the real actions of specialists, especially when
it comes to medical care for people in socially unfavorable conditions.
The need to make high social responsibility in the professional activities of veterinarians is
discussed by researchers Sumner C.L., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. in the publication “Canadian
dairy cattle veterinarian perspectives on calf welfare” [24]. In their opinion, working with
objects of nature should be approached with a high level of social responsibility. This principle
is spelled out by law in a special protocol “On the protection and welfare of animals”, for
example, in the European Union and recognizes animals as beings that have feelings and
obliges European institutions to develop and implement their policies to take care of their wellbeing. The authors of the article on the example of focus groups with veterinarians show the
opinion of the professional community of veterinarians of Canada about the responsibility for
the conditions of detention, therapeutic and preventive procedures that do not cause significant
damage to the welfare of animals. The importance of not only instrumental professional skills,
but also general cultural values and professional social responsibility is emphasized.
Many examples of the implementation of professional social responsibility sound at the
level of quality management processes in organizations of various fields of activity, the
achievement of which is an integral component of the personal responsibility of each specialist
[13, 15, 20, 21, 22].
3. METHODS AND MATERIAL
A survey of specialists, representatives of different professional communities (IT specialists,
mechanical engineers, food technologists, veterinarians, and financial economists) was
conducted in the Stavropol Territory. 621 specialists of enterprises and organizations of the
region took part in the expert assessment procedure. A statistical processing of the survey
results was carried out in the SPSS program (version 21), which made it possible to carry out
a ranking of the significance of life values in professional communities and to conduct their
comparative analysis.
In addition, it was based on the World Engineering Initiative (CDIO) standards. The survey
participants from the professional community of mechanical engineers conducted a survey of
119 experts who expressed their views on the importance of the competencies of future
engineers. The competence significance indicators were subjected to factor analysis in the
SPSS program (version 21) and showed the grouping of competencies, including those related
to the formation and expression of social responsibility of a mechanical engineer in terms of
the requirements of professional activity and the expectations of the professional environment.
4. RESULTS
A list of values was proposed, which are relevant to the professional community, in the survey
of specialists from enterprises and organizations in the southern region of Russia. The
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1394
editor@iaeme.com
Values-Based Orientations as a Formation Factor of the Social Responsibility of the Professional
Community
evaluation of relevance on a five-point scale and the calculation of average values made it
possible to rank the results obtained in segmentation by groups of professional communities.
The data presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Evaluation by experts of the values’ significance (average score on a 5-point scale)
List of values
1. Approval of others whose opinion is important to
me
2. High social status (material well-being and
power)
3. Creative and research activities
4. Getting pleasure from life
5. The ambition for the new unknown
6. Well-being of loved ones and relatives
7. Tolerance and patient attitude to others
8. Faith in God
9. Following the traditional culture and customs of
own nation
10. Own safety and the safety of others
11. Respect for elders, self-discipline and obedience
Veterinaria
ns
Economist
s,
IT engineers
financiers
Food
technologist
Engine
ers
3,8
3,6
4,2
2,5
4,2
4,5
4,6
4,1
3,5
4,1
4,3
3,9
4,1
4,8
4,2
4,2
4,0
4,6
3,6
5,0
4,0
3,7
3,1
3,8
3,9
5,0
3,9
4,1
4,3
4,5
4,1
5,0
3,7
3,4
3,1
3,8
3,9
5,0
3,9
4,1
4,6
4,1
4,0
3,2
4,0
4,9
4,1
5,0
4,9
5,0
4,2
5,0
4,3
5,0
4,2
The first place in all represented professional groups of specialists is occupied by the value
“own safety and the safety of others” and “well-being of loved ones” It should be noted the
deep conviction of professional communities of specialists with higher education in social
responsibility for their own lives, the lives and well-being of others, family and relatives. If in
the assessment of other values there is a certain range of opinions, then it is in these that it is
minimal.
In the process of analyzing the content of state standards of preparation by the expert
community of various professional fields, the need to increase attention to the competencies of
professional social responsibility of university graduates can be traced. For example, specialists
of the veterinary services of the region, along with functional skills, speak about competence
like the ability and willingness to organize and conduct monitoring of the occurrence and
spread of infectious, invasive and other diseases, biological environmental pollution,
quarantine measures, protection of the population in the centers of especially dangerous
infections , with the deterioration of the radiation situation and natural disasters; the ability and
willingness to organize and monitor the conduct of mass diagnostic and medical-preventive
activities aimed at the early detection, prevention and prompt treatment of dangerous diseases,
including zoo-anthropozoonosts. The expert community of financial economists calls their
readiness to act in unusual situations, to bear social and ethical responsibility for the decisions
made among the most important for future graduates.
Using the results of an expert survey of mechanical engineers as an example, the desired
competencies / attributes were analyzed. In the professional community opinion a graduate of
an undergraduate of a bachelor program should possess. The list of possible competencies was
formulated based on the approaches of the World Engineering Initiative (CDIO).
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1395
editor@iaeme.com
V. A. Ivashova, V. N. Goncharov, A.M. Erokhin, O. U. Kolosova, L. A. Tronina and O.N.
Kamalova
As a result of the factor analysis carried out in the SPSS program (version 21, selection
method — principal component analysis, rotation method — varimax with Kaiser
normalization), the relationships between the values of variables were studied, which were 24
desirable competencies / attributes.
The full explained variance is presented in the following Table 2.
Table 2 – Full explained variance
Compon
ent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Initialeigenvalue
Extraction sums of squared loadings Rotation sums of squared loadings
Cumulative
%
Cumulativ
%
Cumulativ
Total
% Variance
Total
Total
%
Variance
e%
Variance
e%
9,190
38,291
38,291
9,190
38,291
38,291
6,447
26,862
26,862
3,543
14,762
53,053
3,543
14,762
53,053
3,501
14,589
41,451
2,717
11,320
64,373
2,717
11,320
64,373
3,043
12,678
54,129
2,259
9,412
73,786
2,259
9,412
73,786
2,795
11,648
65,776
1,285
5,355
79,140
1,285
5,355
79,140
1,970
8,208
73,984
1,158
4,823
83,964
1,158
4,823
83,964
1,798
7,491
81,475
1,020
4,251
88,215
1,020
4,251
88,215
1,618
6,740
88,215
,844
3,516
91,731
,679
2,831
94,562
,433
1,804
96,367
,341
1,422
97,788
,210
,874
98,662
,184
,767
99,429
,062
,257
99,686
,046
,190
99,876
,026
,109
99,985
,004
,015
100,000
7,441E-16 3,100E-15
100,000
3,784E-16 1,577E-15
100,000
2,003E-16 8,346E-16
100,000
5,998E-17 2,499E-16
100,000
-8,733E-3,639E-16
100,000
17
-2,637E-1,099E-15
100,000
16
-1,060E-4,416E-15
100,000
15
Allocation method: principal component analysis
The factor analysis procedure allowed us to group the listed 24 desirable competencies into
7 key attributes of the graduate model of the bachelor program in Mechanical Engineering.
Table 3 – Matrix of rotated componentsa
1.Basic knowledge of
mathematics and physics
1
2
3
Component
4
0,281
0,130
0,183
0,017
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1396
5
6
7
0,903
0,038
0,073
editor@iaeme.com
Values-Based Orientations as a Formation Factor of the Social Responsibility of the Professional
Community
2.Key knowledge of
engineering fundamentals
3.In-depth knowledge of
the basics of engineering,
methods and tools
4.Analytical foundation
and problem solving
5.Ability to conduct
experiments and research
6.Operational thinking
7.Ethics, justice and other
responsibilities
8. Ability to carry out
effective interaction with
people around
9. Ability to manage a
team
10.Ability to carry out
effective communication
in foreign languages
11.Understanding the role
and responsibility of an
engineer
12.Engineer's
entrepreneurial and
business initiative
13. The ability to analyze
the process, evaluate the
results of the work and
plan the activities of the
unit
14.Willingness to
participate in the design of
technical tools and
technological processes
and production systems
15.Ability to organize
production process and
ensure compliance with
safety and sanitation
requirements
16.Operational readiness
of production machines,
process equipment and
systems
17.Ability to organize a
team to perform
production tasks
efficiently and on time
0,759
0,075
-0,357
0,116
0,467
0,132
-0,013
0,926
0,035
-0,169
0,091
0,077
0,062
-0,077
0,280
0,532
0,315
0,218
0,488
0,040
-0,104
-0,228
0,149
0,769
0,285
0,006
0,013
-0,275
0,016
0,724
0,225
0,227
-0,046
0,057
0,028
0,021
0,759
0,220
0,079
0,258
0,002
0,467
0,076
0,653
-0,063
0,020
0,334
0,319
0,496
0,102
0,246
0,820
-0,286
0,238
0,026
0,236
0,116
0,254
0,034
0,156
0,045
0,884
0,127
0,259
0,873
0,152
-0,062
0,005
0,074
-0,197
0,828
0,185
0,324
0,179
0,194
0,071
0,095
0,656
0,308
0,417
-0,133
0,444
-0,023
-0,181
0,426
0,285
0,678
-0,033
0,153
0,303
-0,069
0,892
-0,080
0,002
0,109
0,306
0,018
-0,088
0,579
0,584
-0,106
-0,118
0,244
0,360
0,146
0,890
0,197
0,198
-0,080
-0,071
0,149
0,103
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1397
editor@iaeme.com
V. A. Ivashova, V. N. Goncharov, A.M. Erokhin, O. U. Kolosova, L. A. Tronina and O.N.
Kamalova
18.Ability to conduct
procedures for testing,
verification, certification
and certification of
production facilities
19.Ability to use standard
technologies for
maintenance, repair and
restoration of worn-out
machine parts
20.Personnel training in
the use of devices,
mechanisms,
technologies, models and
systems
21.Ability to complete the
life cycle and recycle
products and waste
22.The ability to use
modern methods of
installation, adjustment of
machines and plants
23.Innovation
implementation from
concept, design,
production, to the launch
of new products and
services on the market
24.Development of
engineering
entrepreneurship skills
0,772
0,232
-0,041
0,393
-0,047
0,086
-0,116
0,623
0,186
0,379
-0,021
0,079
0,324
0,551
0,583
0,009
0,213
-0,074
0,114
0,056
-0,652
0,372
-0,109
0,165
0,521
-0,011
0,609
-0,252
0,107
-0,034
-0,111
0,873
0,121
0,168
-0,093
0,114
0,236
0,014
0,864
-0,040
0,138
0,128
0,011
0,069
0,585
0,674
-0,018
-0,310
0,163
Allocation method: Principal component analysis.
Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization.
a. The rotation converged in 12 iterations.
The first factor can be meaningfully interpreted as a confident possession of all engineering
processes during the production cycle.
The second factor reflects all types of responsibility from ensuring safety and sanitation to
ethics and justice, understanding the role and professional responsibility of an engineer not
only to the production team, but also to the community.
The third factor is the organization of the production team for the team result of innovation
and design, i.e. not that, but the organization of actions of the structural division of the
company.
The fourth factor is the skills of introducing innovations from concept, design and
installation to engineering entrepreneurial initiatives to promote the results of innovations in
the consumer environment.
The fifth factor is the availability of basic theoretical knowledge in the field of physics,
mathematics and related fields of knowledge, depending on the specifics of the activity.
The sixth factor is the possession of production waste disposal methods at the level of world
approaches and trends.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1398
editor@iaeme.com
Values-Based Orientations as a Formation Factor of the Social Responsibility of the Professional
Community
The seventh factor is readiness for mentoring and training personnel to use devices,
mechanisms, technologies, models and systems.
Thus, practically 5 out of 7 key attributes of the model of a graduate of a bachelor program
in Mechanical Engineering, to some degree or other, touch upon aspects of the social
professional responsibility of a specialist.
Since the professional community of specialists describes the high importance of various
types of social and professional responsibility at the level of competencies. They are
respectively harmonized with their own professional activities and responsibilities.
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Thus, at the level of statistical observations we get confirmation of the understanding of the
significance of professional social responsibility with localization within specific enterprises
and a high status value “own safety and the safety of others” and “well-being of loved ones” in
the system of value orientations of professional communities of the region [11, 17, 29].
The information obtained in the course of the study is important for improving the training
of graduates of higher education, building an organizational culture in accordance with the
requirements of the concept of corporate social responsibility, ensuring the quality of the image
of organizations that position themselves as CSR supporters. The research strategy can be
complemented by benchmarking with other professional groups and regions [12, 14, 16].
Monitoring studies of the impact of value orientations of specialists on corporate social
responsibility will help the understanding of opinion leaders of professional communities and
ensure a balance of interests of enterprises and organizations and the regional community,
business and society as a whole.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Akdere, M., Hickman, L., Kirchner, M. Developing Leadership Competencies for STEM
Fields: The Case of Purdue Polytechnic Leadership Academy (2019) Advances in
Developing Human Resources, 21(1), pp. 49-71
Axjonow, A., Ernstberger, J., Pott, C. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility
Disclosure on Corporate Reputation: A Non-professional Stakeholder Perspective (2018)
Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), pp. 429-450
Ayala-Rodríguez, N., Barreto, I., RozasOssandón, G., Castro, A., Moreno, S. Social
transcultural representations about the concept of university social responsibility (2019)
Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), pp. 245-259
Barsukova, T., Ivashova, V., Gunko, J., Gavrilova, O., Chaplitskaya, A. Designing
professional competence of leaders of the regional agrarian sector (2019) International
Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(1), pp. 768-776
Baklanov, I.S., Baklanova, O.A., Goncharov, V.N., Erokhin, A.M., Kolosova, O.Y.
Ontological status and valuable determination of social norms and normative systems
(2015) Social Sciences (Pakistan), 10(9), с. 2216-2220
Chen, Z.F., Hong, C., Occa, A. How different CSR dimensions impact organizationemployee relationships: The moderating role of CSR-culture fit (2019) Corporate
Communications, 24(1), pp. 63-78
Contreras, M.V., Albornoz, J.M. Methodological adjustments in a computer engineering
course to enhance social responsibility (2018) Proceedings - International Conference of
the Chilean Computer Science Society, SCCC, 2017-October, pp.. 1-4
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1399
editor@iaeme.com
V. A. Ivashova, V. N. Goncharov, A.M. Erokhin, O. U. Kolosova, L. A. Tronina and O.N.
Kamalova
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
Elembilassery, V., Gurunathan, L. Mandated CSR and mode of implementation: the Indian
context (2018) Social Responsibility Journal, 14(4), pp. 701-718
Foley, R., Gibbs, B. Connecting Engineering Processes and Responsible Innovation: A
Response to Macro-Ethical Challenges (2019) Engineering Studies, article in press.
Hautakangas, M., Ahva, L. Introducing a New Form of Socially Responsible Journalism:
Experiences from the Conciliatory Journalism Project (2018) Journalism Practice, 12(6),
pp. 730-746
Hills, S., Walker, M., Barry, A.E. Sport as a vehicle for health promotion: A shared value
example of corporate social responsibility (2019) Sport Management Review, 22(1),
pp.126-141\
Lavee, E., Cohen, N., Nouman, H. Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and
practices in street-level bureaucrats' engagement in policy design (2018) Public
Administration, 96(2), с. 333-348
Lee, S.Y., Lee, J.Y., Cho, Y.-S. Framing corporate social responsibility for a controversial
product (2018) Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 35(8), pp. 988-999
Miller, K.E., Zoltowski, C.B., Buzzanell, P.M., (...), Corple, D., Feister, M.K. Exploring
team social responsibility in multidisciplinary design teams (2018) ASEE Annual
Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018-June
Nieusma, D., Cieminski, M. Ethics education as enculturation: Student learning of
personal, social, and professional responsibility (2018) ASEE Annual Conference and
Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018-June
Nittala, S., Zephirin, T., Howland, S.M.J., (...), Katz, A., Jesiek, B.K. Investigating
influences on first-year engineering students' views of ethics and social responsibility
(2018) ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018-June
Osagie, E.R., Wesselink, R., Runhaar, P., Mulder, M. Unraveling the Competence
Development of Corporate Social Responsibility Leaders: The Importance of Peer
Learning, Learning Goal Orientation, and Learning Climate (2018) Journal of Business
Ethics, 151(4), pp. 891-906
Robinson, S., Wood, S. A “good” new brand – What happens when new brands try to stand
out through corporate social responsibility (2018) Journal of Business Research, 92, pp.
231-241
Severino-González, P., Moraga, O.A. Educational training of socially responsible
professionals. Experience of a public and state university | [Formaçãoeducacional de
profissionaissocialmenteresponsáveis.Experiência de umauniversidadepública e estadual]
(2019) Espacios, 40(5)
Smith, J.M., Lucena, J.C. Social responsibility in engineering education and practice:
Alignments, mismatches, and future directions (2018) ASEE Annual Conference and
Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018-June
Smith, J.M., Smith, N.M., Rulifson, G., (...), Sarver, E.A., Kaunda, R.B. Student learning
about engineering and corporate social responsibility: A comparison across engineering
and liberal arts courses (2018) ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference
Proceedings, 2018-June
Smith, N.M., Smith, J.M., Battalora, L.A., Teschner, B.A. Industry-University
Partnerships: Engineering Education and Corporate Social Responsibility (2018) Journal
of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 144(3),04018002
Spencer, B.J., Sriraman, V., Talley, K.G., Ortiz, A.M. Social cognitive impact of industry
internships upon engineering technology students developing professional identity: A case
study (2018) ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018June
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1400
editor@iaeme.com
Values-Based Orientations as a Formation Factor of the Social Responsibility of the Professional
Community
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
Sumner, C.L., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. Canadian dairy cattle veterinarian perspectives on
calf welfare (2018) Journal of Dairy Science, 101(11), pp.. 10303-10316
Teixeira, A., Ferreira, M.R., Correia, A., Lima, V. Students’ perceptions of corporate social
responsibility: evidences from a Portuguese higher education institution (2018)
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(2), pp. 235-252
Tsalis, T.A., Stylianou, M.S., Nikolaou, I.E. Evaluating the quality of corporate social
responsibility reports: The case of occupational health and safety disclosures (2018) Safety
Science, 109, pp. 313-323
Utgård, J. Retail chains’ corporate social responsibility communication (2018) Journal of
Business Ethics, 147(2), pp. 385-400
Ventres, W., Boelen, C., Haq, C. Time for action: key considerations for implementing
social accountability in the education of health professionals (2018) Advances in Health
Sciences Education, 23(4), pp. 853-862
Zou, Z., Wu, Y., Zhu, Q., Yang, S. Do Female Executives Prioritize Corporate Social
Responsibility?(2018) Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(13), pp. 2965-2981
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp
1401
editor@iaeme.com