Take a Stand Is Animal Testing Necessary? "There is no reason to continue to use nonhuman animals for scientific or commercial testing. There are ample non-animal alternatives that are readily available that are just as good or better in the Ethical, Economical, and Educational arenas. “If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal who hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” ― Ellen DeGeneres, My Point... And I Do Have One Many teachers and researchers agree with this point of view. https://www.the-scientist.com/newsopinion/software-based-chemical-screen-couldminimize-animal-testing-64491 Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado and author of The Emotional Lives of Animals Free-Choice: Images, graphs (with URLs cited) https://www.animalalliance.ca/animal-researchcanada/ Summaries of Sources Defense of sources (Why are these sources credible?) No https://www.veggieathletic.com/food-giantsinvolved-in-animal-testing-scandal/ Marc Bekoff, PhD, former Professor of Ecology and Additional power-quotes “But the toxicology tests on which regulators rely to gather this information are stuck in a time warp, and are largely based on wasteful and often poorly predictive animal experiments” The toxicity tests that have been used for decades are “simply bad science”, he explains. “We now have an opportunity to start with a clean slate and develop evidence based tests that have true predictive value.” “To test a chemical for its potential to cause cancer takes five years and involves 400 rats. More than 50% of the results are positive, of which 90% are false positives.” Thomas Hartung Lists of sources for further study https://speakingofresearch.com/facts/medical-benefits/ https://animal-testing.procon.org/ https://blogs.unimelb.edu.au/sciencecommunication/201 6/10/22/animal-testing-is-it-necessary/ http://www.vib.be/en/aboutvib/organization/Pages/Why-animal-research-isessential.aspx https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/fact-sheetcosmetic-testing Thesis Statement: (Animal Testing is unnecessary, because it causes animals suffering, it costs more money and we have other alternatives.) Most Compelling Evidence: 1) It causes animals to suffer. According to the 1988 Animal Welfare Enforcement Report by the Department of Agriculture, about 94 percent of all laboratory animals reported are not exposed to painful procedures or are given drugs to relieve any pain caused by a procedure.30 The remaining 6 percent of animals are exposed to painful procedures because to relieve them of the pain would defeat the purpose of the experiment. Even in these cases, however, the pain is usually neither severe nor long-lasting. https://www.nap.edu/read/10089/chapter/12 2) It costs more money. According to the Lexington HeraldLeader, the $71,000 that went to the cocaine study is only the tip of the iceberg. Among several different institutes studying several different addictive substances, the scientific community has wasted $20 million taxpayer dollars exposing animals to drugs for a variety of arbitrary and pointless tests. https://www.care2.com/causes/high-cost-of-animaltesting.html 3) We have other alternatives. These alternatives to animal testing include sophisticated tests using human cells and tissues (also known as in vitro methods), advanced computer-modeling techniques (often referred to as in silico models), and studies with human volunteers. https://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-forexperimentation/alternatives-animal-testing/ Commentary: So what? Why should we care? Where do we go from here? Animal testing is unnecessary and sometimes it’s cruel and inhuman. Scientists are researching other alternatives to reduce animal experimentation. Those alternatives cost less money and safer than experimenting on animals. In some cases, animals don’t receive pain relieve so they experiment pain, this is cruel. Animals died because their necks are broken or from the effect of injections. Mock Poster Template Name: Alice Nguyen Period: 3 Date: December 1, 2018 To avoid the space constraints above, you may, alternatively, draft your board below: Thesis Statement: (Animal testing is unnecessary because it causes animals suffering, it costs more money and we have other alternatives.) Most Compelling Evidence: 1) It causes animals suffering: According to the 1988 Animal Welfare Enforcement Report by the Department of Agriculture, about 94 percent of all laboratory animals reported are not exposed to painful procedures or are given drugs to relieve any pain caused by a procedure.30 The remaining 6 percent of animals are exposed to painful procedures because to relieve them of the pain would defeat the purpose of the experiment. Even in these cases, however, the pain is usually neither severe nor long-lasting. 2) It costs more money: According to the Lexington Herald-Leader, the $71,000 that went to the cocaine study is only the tip of the iceberg. Among several different institutes studying several different addictive substances, the scientific community has wasted $20 million taxpayer dollars exposing animals to drugs for a variety of arbitrary and pointless tests. 3) We have other alternatives: These alternatives to animal testing include sophisticated tests using human cells and tissues (also known as in vitro methods), advanced computer-modeling techniques (often referred to as in silico models), and studies with human volunteers. Commentary: So what? Why should we care? Where do we go from here? Animal testing is unnecessary and sometimes it’s cruel and inhuman. Scientists are researching other alternatives to reduce animal experimentation. Those alternatives cost less money and safer than experimenting on animals. In some cases, animals don’t receive pain relieve so they experiment pain, this is cruel. Animals died because their necks are broken or from the effect of injections. Background Information What is the history of this issue? Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research. Early Greek physician-scientists, such as Aristotle, (384 – 322 BC) and Erasistratus, (304 – 258 BC), performed experiments on living animals. Similarly, Galen (129 – 199 / 217 AD), a Greek physician who practiced in Rome, conducted animal experiments to advance the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients. Who is affected? Animals such as mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and monkeys. Why is this issue important? Animal experiments are performed in Belgium and in many other countries. These experiments are performed on animals, in most instances because it is impossible to perform them on humans. Animal experiments are performed for scientific – particularly biomedical – research, for the testing of the safety of certain consumer products and for the testing of the safety of chemical substances. Persuasive Appeals Best example(s) of research (ethos): As a science student nearing the end of my degree, this burning question is at the forefront of my mind. Since neuroscience may be the field that I major in, whether I want to use animals is an important factor to consider. Best example(s) of research (logos): An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC. Best example(s) of research (pathos): The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia.