Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
Management Contracts in Hospitality Organizations: Sheraton Reviewed
When managing a hotel there are many parameters to consider. As the manager, the
responsibility of maintaining the hotel’s brand and standards are central. How did the hospitality
industry get to a point in which it recognized the need to bind managers to certain standards.
Hotel management contracts were first prepared over fifty years ago as a mechanism to allow
resort operators to extend globally without extensive capital investment, the modern global
management agreement has emerged as a nicely established arrangement among hotel owners
and the companies that managed them (Evanoff, 2016). While the first control agreements
empowered the operating companies’ interests, current contracts have accomplished extra
stability between the parties (frequently with a third-party lender also expressing interest in the
settlement provisions). Most of the risk still rests with the proprietor, but these days the operator
usually should meet performance goals to preserve the agreement in force (DeGenova, 2007). It
is also viable for a proprietor to dismiss an operator for no reason (underneath ideas of agency
and private carrier agreement regulation). However, damages may also then be because of the
operator. Particular contract provisions, including base fee and incentive price formulas and the
duration of the settlement, evolve and modifications in line with market forces and the relative
bargaining strength of the events. This paper will delineate the history of, why hotel owners
needs, and the impact of hotel management agencies on Starwood’s Hotels and Resorts brand,
the Sheraton.
Given the arrival of hotel management contracts in North America during the Nineteen
Seventies, settlement negotiations, and the proprietor-operator association dictated by a risky
mixture of economics and power many respects were very volatile. During the early years of
1
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
hotel management agreement negotiations, operators wielded extensive control over the
procedure, due to the combination of better levels of expertise in operations and contracted
negotiation and control over the brand association.
Consequently, branded operators more or less dictated contract terms to proprietors who
normally had little hospitality industry understanding or experience yielding control agreements
closely favorable to the operator. The occasional pension fund or big institutional investor
become capable of standing its ground in management contract negotiations because of the
dimensions of its portfolio, but in standard, the negotiating power laid with the manager. In such
an environment, the owner’s level of oversight and approval once the agreement was in force
denoted as blind faith. In the course of times of economic increase and prosperity, the association
between hotel proprietors and operators were fairly non-violent (DeGenova, 2007).
Hotel proprietors reaped the monetary benefits of lodge ownership, which outpaced
returns from most other real property investment entities, while operators were able to expand
the number of rooms maintained under their management and their brand distribution networks
without substantial capital funding. Both parties benefited from the association, and little interest
paid to compare whether or not the rewards were proportional to the financial danger assumed.
Due to the fact properties were appearing satisfactorily, contract termination provisions invoked.
The right execution of a hotel management contract among the owner and the operator is an
important step inside the development of a hit motel undertaking. In the contemporary highly
competitive environment, operators are eager to "seal the deal” as quickly as possible, sometimes
overpromising performance results. Owners, however, are now extra aware and knowledgeable,
wanting to safeguard their funding via knowledge the management contract terms and conditions
very well before signing.
2
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
Over the past few years, the hotel proprietor’s mentality has changed over time.
Proprietors now conduct major consideration of the impact that management contract provisions
have on the value of their investments. The proprietors’ ability to realize that cost through a sale
and the equalizing of hazards and rewards accessible to the proprietor and the operator is
paramount to a hotel’s success (Lodging Staff, 2018). Also, owners now realize that the
operator’s interests aligned with theirs and that a level of control over the hotel management
function is essential to defend their investment value and their flexibility. In part, this evolution
may attribute to the monetary downturns that have examined the connection between proprietors
and operators, revealing imbalances that owners did no longer formally recognize. But the most
important thing riding the shift in owners’ questioning is without a doubt the better stage of class
and revel in observed in nowadays’s hotel proprietors. Present-Day resort proprietors are
drastically extra informed about the hospitality industry than their counterparts in the 1970s and
1980s (Lodging Staff, 2018).
Moreover, today’s owners often appoint, either internally or externally, dedicated hotel
investment experts, asset managers, and legal counsel to symbolize their pursuits. These days'
hotel owners recognize the impact of the term, ‘no-cut’ management agreement have on the
worth of their property in the event of a sale. Many hotel proprietors have witnessed or worked at
the negative outcomes on belongings of brand effect; and have read court rulings consisting of
Woolley v. Embassy Suites,1 2660 Woodley Road v. ITT Sheraton and other that verify owners’
rights and the operator’s fiduciary obligations to ownership (Evanoff, 2016).
Sheraton hotels and resorts is an international hotel chain retained by Marriott
International. Sheraton presently manages over 500 hotels globally, including locations in North
3
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
America, Africa, Asia Pacific, Central and South America, Europe, the Middle East, and the
Caribbean. It acts as an independent management company (Marriott International, Inc., 2017).
Independent management companies are hotels that function under a brand (if any) via a
license contract between the proprietor of the hotel and the brand (Marriott, Hilton, Hilton,
Hyatt, Fairmont, Starwood, etc.), and the inn itself is operated on behalf of proprietor by a third
celebration unbiased management company. For impartial management corporations, the overall
initial period is 5 to 10 years with the occasional addendum of a five-year renewal term (Marriott
International, Inc., 2017). The hotel management agreement (HMA), is often terminable upon
the sale of the lodge to a third celebration, or upon the price of a termination charge that
commonly stages among 1 to 5 years worth of management fees. It is beneath this structure, the
motel owner ought to pay franchise charges to the logo as well as management charges to the
independent management organization, but impartial management companies have lower value
structure (inclusive of worker costs) — the shape used with constrained service, select provider,
and extended stay brands. Examples of many of the corporate independent management
companies include Interstate Hotels & Resorts, Crescent hotels, Sage Hospitality, and Davidson
Hotel Company (Marriott International, Inc., 2017).
In the late 1950s and continuing during the 1960s, the management agreement model,
setting apart possession from the operation of the asset, gained severe traction in the United
States (Evanoff, 2016). As Hilton international and InterContinental prospered overseas,
different U.S. hotel organizations decided to enter the international market, the use of the
enormously new management agreement model. Sheraton commenced increasing beyond the
united states in the Sixties, as did Western global (Westin) and Marriott. Hyatt, which
commenced operations in 1957 underneath the ownership of the Pritzker circle of relatives,
4
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
opened its first worldwide lodge in Hong Kong in 1969. With some exceptions, those
organizations relied mostly on management agreements (and not possession) for global growth
(Evanoff, 2016).
Moreover, although Pan Am and Transglobal faded from the scene, Hilton international
and InterContinental persisted in increasing below a chain of different owners. Today, the global
lodge management agreement is vastly more complex than it was at the same time as late as the
1990s. For tax and other reasons, the primary agreement split into as many as six or seven
different documents. New ideas introduced as hotel management companies, and owners have
grown classier, and as the landscape of the marketplace has undergone significant change,
because of increased7 David Eisen, “management Agreements put under the Microscope,” hotel
management, August 2012 (Lodging Staff, 2018). Sheraton and Westin are now owned by
Starwood hotels and resorts, which has a large variety of other brands.
The Marriott family of hotels has grown to consist of Ritz-Carlton and numerous different top
class brands (and Marriott has agreed to acquire Starwood at this writing). Hyatt presently has
four top class brands: Hyatt Regency, Grand Hyatt, Park Hyatt, and Andaz, the latest addition.
Hilton has the Conrad brand. Few if any of the major chains are limited to at least one top rate
product, and all have lower-tier manufacturers (indeed, more than one decrease-tier brands). Tne
cause that the management settlement and the license agreement are separate, for example, is that
withholding taxes are usually higher for management charges than for royalties. The taxation of
the operator’s fees and other receipts is an extremely complex count number this is beyond this
paper’s scope (DeGenova, 2007).
The other number one purpose for separate agreements is to lessen the effect of the
termination case regulation, the theory being that the control settlement can be a challenge to
5
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
termination without cause under company regulation principles, but the licensing settlement
would continue to exist intact. I've in no way seen this examined. Competition, advances in
technology, new rules, and diverse court decisions motivated modifications in HMAs. However,
nowadays’s worldwide management agreements nonetheless have tons not unusual with people
who negotiated more than forty years ago.
Many participants of the general public hold one of two conflicting misconceptions,
concerning motel chains’ franchising and lodge ownership reputation. The primary false
impression is that every one motel chains use a franchising version, where the motel corporation
licenses its call and recognize how, and components a reservations gadget and worldwide
advertising. In franchising, operations performed with the aid of the owner or a chosen thirdparty lodge working company. This owner-operator franchising model is genuinely present about
many finances and mid-level firms. Franchising is common with organizations offering restricted
services, usually only rooms, even though a few operators franchise their full-service, lower-tier
business-degree properties (along with Hilton, Marriott, Sheraton, and Westin), provided a
skilled third-party operator covered in the arrangement. However, a few of the high-end
operators; organizations that operate large, luxurious resorts; franchising of premium brands is
extremely rare. Maintaining standards is critical to these operators, and complete control
produces a much higher price movement. Full control, of course, does include more capital
funding and higher overhead, but these fees offset with the aid of higher expenses and gadget
costs for such things as education, chain-wide advertising offerings, and reservations. I’ll make
bigger on machine-reimbursable fees below in my discussion of contract provisions.
The second one (and conflicting) false impression is that motel control groups do in truth
very own all of the houses they operate. As part of beyond improvement efforts a control
6
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
business enterprise may additionally nicely personal a number of its residences, and for
numerous motives, a chain may also make a small investment in a new motel, however usually
these days the chains steer clear of ownership, together with the attendant risks. A few chains
have created real property investment trusts to own a number of their resorts. However, that is
most commonplace in the united states. Marriott becomes one of the first chains to do this, MGM
inns and motels simply announced that ten owned properties within the U.S. placed into a REIT,
and Hilton is also getting ready to spin off its owned motels to a newly created REIT (Lodging
Staff, 2018). It is genuine that there are a handful of chains that choose ownership, but usually,
the ones are smaller chains owned by way of rich families that wish to have absolute control in
their assets. The Peninsula group is a working example.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Sheraton's proprietors, Starwood Hotels & Resorts
International, Inc. signed a hundred and twenty lodge management and franchise contracts,
representing about 21,400 rooms, of which 101 are new builds, and 19 are conversions from
other brands (Marriott International, Inc., 2017). On June 30, 2016, the corporation had
approximately 640 motels inside the active pipeline representing approximately 132,000 rooms.
In the course of the second zone of 2016, 20 new resorts and resorts (representing about 4,200
rooms) entered the system, consisting of The St. Regis Kuala Lumpur, (Malaysia, 208 rooms),
Le Méridien Singapore, Sentosa (Singapore, 191 rooms), W Dubai Al Habtoor city (United Arab
Emirates, 423 rooms), Sheraton Grand Hangzhou Binjiang hotel (China, 301 rooms) and Aloft
Guangzhou Tianhe (China, 496 rooms). Throughout the quarter, four properties (representing
approximately 1,000 rooms) eliminated from the system (Evanoff, 2016).
In summary, hotel management is critical for the success of any type and size of the hotel
for both the proprietors and managers. Having clear boundaries and expectations set for both
7
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
owners and proprietors increases the chances for success for a budding or existing entity.
Sheraton’s long history will continue if proper management of the brand persists. Starwood has
made many changes to how the brand communicated in the 21st century. The changes
implemented in the development of the new properties
In summary, hotel management is critical for the success of any type and size of the hotel
for both the proprietors and managers. Having clear boundaries and expectations set for both
owners and proprietors increases the chances for success for a budding or existing entity.
Sheraton’s long history will continue if proper management of the brand persists. Starwood has
made many changes to how the brand communicated in the 21st century. The changes
implemented in the development of the new properties and closing of some old locations have
reinvented and reintroduced the brand of Sheraton to millennials and those already familiar with
the Sheraton brand.
8
Khori Wilkins
HMG 433 Legal Environment in Hospitality
Works Cited
DeGenova, N. (2007, November 29). News for Hospitality Executive. Retrieved October 29,
2018, from Hotel Online.
Evanoff, M. (2016). Cornell University School of Hotel Administration: The International Hotel
Management Agreement: Origins; Evolution, and Status. The Scholarly Commons, 1-20.
Lodging Staff. (2018, August 8). RAR Hospitality Acquires Management Contract for Four
Points by Sheraton San Diego. Retrieved November 12, 2018, from Lodging Magazine.
Marriott International, Inc. (2017, January 5). 2016 Annual Report. Retrieved October 29, 2018,
from Shareholder.
9