PART A
Chairperson’s Visit Report
Undergraduate Engineering Program
TIER-II
Name of the Institution
__________________________________
Name of the Program
_______________________
Visit Dates
___________________
NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION
NBCC Place, East Tower, 4th Floor, Bhisham Pitamah Marg, Pragati
Vihar, New Delhi 110003
Tel: +91 112430620-22; 01124360654; www.nbaind.org
Team composition
Name of the Chairperson:______________________________________________________
Designation:_________________________________________________________________
Program 1:
Program evaluator 1
Name
Organization:
Program evaluator 2
Name
Organization:
Program 2:
Program evaluator 1
Name
Organization:
Program evaluator 2
Name
Organization:
Program 3:
Program evaluator 1
Name
Organization:
Program evaluator 2
Name
Organization:
Program 4:
Program evaluator 1
Name
Organization:
Program evaluator 2
Name
Organization:
Program 5:
Program evaluator 1
Name
Organization:
Program evaluator 2
Name
Organization:
Institute Details
Year of Establishment: _________________________
Physical Infrastructure and Ambience: __________________________________
Number of programs being run in the Institute*:
(i) UG- ____________________
(ii) PG - ____________________
Total Number of Students:
(i) In UG programs - _____________
(ii) In PG programs - _____________
Name of programs applied for accreditation
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
*to be verified from SAR
Information for Evaluation
Award of Accreditation (TIER II (UG)
1. Full Accreditation for Six years will be accorded to a program on
fulfilment of the following requirements:
i.
Program scoring a minimum of 750 points in aggregate out of 1000
points with minimum score of 60% in mandatory fields (criteria 4 to
6)
ii.
The number of available Ph.D. in the department is greater than or
equal to 30% of the required number of faculty averaged for
previous two academic years including current academic year.
iii.
Admissions in the UG program at the program level are more than or
equal to 75% while at the institute level, the admissions are more
than or equal to 50%, averaged for previous three academic years
including Current Academic Year.
iv.
Faculty Student Ratio in the department is less than or equal to 1:15
averaged for the previous three academic years including current
academic year.
v.
At least 2 Professors or 1 Professor and 1 Associate Professor (on a
full-time/regular basis) with Ph.D. Degree are available in the
concerned department for previous two academic years including
current academic year.
vi.
The HOD of the program under consideration possesses Ph.D.
Degree.
vii.
The placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship ratio is
greater than or equal to 40% averaged over previous three
assessment years
2. Provisional Accreditation for Three years will be accorded to a
program on fulfilment of the following requirements:
i.
The score for the program is greater than or equal to 600 points
with minimum 40% marks in Criterion V (Faculty Information and
Contributions).
ii.
At least one Professor or one Associate Professor with Ph.D. degree
(on a full-time/regular basis) is available in the respective
Department for previous two academic years including current
academic year.
iii.
The student faculty ratio in the department under consideration is
less than or equal to 1:25 averaged for previous three academic
years including current academic year.
iv.
The number of available Ph.D. in the department is greater than or
equal to 10% of the required number of faculty averaged for
previous two academic years including current academic year.
v.
The placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship ratio is
greater than or equal to 40% averaged over previous three
assessment years
3.
No Accreditation of the program
If the program scores less than 600 marks or less than 40% marks in
Faculty Information and Contributions (Criterion V) or fails to meet the
criteria for award of provisional accreditation for 3 years, the program avail
not be considered for accreditation.
Name of the Program 1:_______________________________________________________
Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.
Max.
Marks
Criteria
6.
Vision, Mission and Program
Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students’ Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support
7.
Continuous Improvement
50
TOTAL
780
2.
3.
4.
5.
Marks
Awarded
60
120
120
150
200
80
B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :
Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.
First Year Academics
50
9.
Student Support Systems
50
10.
Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources
Remarks
Remarks
120
TOTAL
220
GRAND TOTAL (A +B)
1000
*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 2:_______________________________________________________
Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.
Max.
Marks
Criteria
6.
Vision, Mission and Program
Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students’ Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support
7.
Continuous Improvement
50
TOTAL
780
2.
3.
4.
5.
Marks
Awarded
60
120
120
150
200
80
B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :
Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.
First Year Academics
50
9.
Student Support Systems
50
10.
Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources
Remarks
Remarks
120
TOTAL
220
GRAND TOTAL (A +B)
1000
*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 3:_______________________________________________________
Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.
Max.
Marks
Criteria
6.
Vision, Mission and Program
Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students’ Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support
7.
Continuous Improvement
50
TOTAL
780
2.
3.
4.
5.
Marks
Awarded
60
120
120
150
200
80
B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :
Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.
First Year Academics
50
9.
Student Support Systems
50
10.
Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources
Remarks
Remarks
120
TOTAL
220
GRAND TOTAL (A +B)
1000
*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 4:_______________________________________________________
Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.
Max.
Marks
Criteria
6.
Vision, Mission and Program
Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students’ Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support
7.
Continuous Improvement
50
TOTAL
780
2.
3.
4.
5.
Marks
Awarded
60
120
120
150
200
80
B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :
Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.
First Year Academics
50
9.
Student Support Systems
50
10.
Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources
Remarks
Remarks
120
TOTAL
220
GRAND TOTAL (A +B)
1000
*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Name of the Program 5:_______________________________________________________
Marks given by Evaluators:
A. Department/Program Specific Criteria:
S. No.
1.
Max.
Marks
Criteria
6.
Vision, Mission and Program
Educational Objectives
Program Curriculum and
Teaching-Learning Processes
Course Outcomes and Program
Outcomes
Students’ Performance
Faculty Information and
Contributions
Facilities and Technical Support
7.
Continuous Improvement
50
TOTAL
780
2.
3.
4.
5.
Marks
Awarded
60
120
120
150
200
80
B. Institute Level Criteria (to be filled by the Chairman) :
Max.
Marks
S. No.
Criteria
Marks
Awarded
8.
First Year Academics
50
9.
Student Support Systems
50
10.
Governance, Institutional
Support and Financial Resources
Remarks
Remarks
120
TOTAL
220
GRAND TOTAL (A +B)
1000
*Assessment for Criteria 8 (8.3, 8.4 &8.5) and 10 (10.3) is different for individual program.
_______________________
Signature
(Chairman)
Overall Observations
1.
S. No.
Name of the
Program
Intake
Admissions
StudentFaculty
Ratio
Placement
(last year)
2. About the progress since last accreditation (to be filled for institutes who have applied for reaccreditation)
Kindly mention the changes made as recommended by NBA, since the previous visit.
3. Observation on general facilities and about the programs.
Kindly mention general observations about facilities like labs, library etc. and a general review about
the programs.




1st year
Academic Ambience
Student Support Systems
Strengths, Weaknesses, Concerns, Suggestions
4. Status of imbibing of outcome based accreditation. For Example:


Formulation of PEOs, PSOs, COs and mappings carried out and implemented
Methodology for assessing the attainment of outcomes

Continual improvement process has been set up

Stakeholders (especially the faculty, HOD, students etc.) awareness about the process