17-18 Ver 1 2017-18 MENTOR TEACHING OBSERVATION FORM Trainee: Fred Flintstone Date/Time: 13.15-15.45 23 April 18 Observer: Bambam Location: City College - Quarry Bank site Subject Specialism: Geology Qualification, Level and Year: Btec L3 year 1. Topic of this session: Shale and mudstone identification No of learners: 12 Current PGCE/CertEd Module: LTA DLLS 490/690 Professional values and practice 2.Evaluate and challenge your practice, values and beliefs; 6. Build positive and collaborative relationships with colleagues and learners; 20.Contribute to organisational development and quality improvement through collaboration with others This documentation must be available to observer: Course/Teaching File (containing scheme of work, previous lesson plans and resources) Y Lesson Plan Y All previous Obs Feedback Forms Y Reflective Development Plan Y Where appropriate Planning for Support Assistant NA Planning identifies responses to: Health and safety Y Differentiation Y - see notes Outcomes of initial assessment Y Equality & Diversity Y Minimum Core Y Employability Y Use of ILT Y Professional Standards Y Subject specialist teaching and learning Standards: 3.Inspire, motivate and raise aspirations of learners through your enthusiasm and knowledge; 7. Maintain and update knowledge of your subject and/or vocational area; 16. Address the mathematics and English needs of learners and work creatively to overcome individual barriers to learning; 19. Maintain and update your teaching and training expertise and vocational skills through collaboration with employers. Impact of Subject Specialist Teaching on learners and their learning experience Effectiveness and impact of these areas to be addressed in feedback: Planning for specialist subject teaching and learning, meeting a diversity of learner needs; Delivery of up-to-date subject specialist content, addressing common errors and misconceptions; Support of maths, English and ICT skills and recognition of their impact on learning, as appropriate; Teaching that raises aspirations of learners; Traditional/creative/innovative approaches appropriate to specialist subject area; Sharing knowledge and understandings of FE or HE progression, and employment opportunities in subject specialist area. Very well planned session with a detailed lesson plan and scheme of work available. Topic was soil and rock formation. A comprehensive group profile showed an in-depth knowledge of learners and their individual needs and differences – appropriate actions clearly identified in the differentiation statement. Preparation of artefacts and sample materials was excellent – these immediately engaged learners and stimulated their interest in learning e.g. mystery box of soil samples. Excellent ILT resources (short videos/visual examples used in early part of session in preparation for the outdoor activity). This demonstrated your developing personal knowledge of the course specifications. Using the slides supported the learner summary and were very effective reinforcing learning points. Plan was available to LSA prior to the session, and their expert knowledge of a particular learner’s needs was effective in managing behaviour. You also guided LSA in supporting learning during group work in the preparation time just prior to the learner summary which enhanced learner engagement. Having the time in the quarry enabled conversations about possible future employment opportunities and industry roles, including some information on routes through FE and HE leading to these roles. Using the ‘mystery samples’ for discussion, and asking them to share their experiences and observation of others, was very effective and further embedded the learning by creating an inclusive and positive learning environment encouraging correct use of terminology as samples were described. The sheet of key questions provided a useful structure and was very effective as a prompt when pairs of learners were finding the investigation difficult to manage alone. It was also good to hear learners correcting each other as they worked out where errors, and unsupported assumptions, had been made in their calculations as they made use of the key question sheet – well done! Overall an excellent session: learners were motivated, enthusiastic and challenged throughout: meticulous planning, well designed activities, sensitive and skilled facilitation of paired work all meant that less confident learners were encouraged to offer suggestions and contributions in an inclusive and supportive manner – very well done. Your group management enabled you to check prior learning. Especially good to hear you suggest that learners use their personal glossary pages when writing up the day’s events. Particularly good to hear and see the learners engaged in calculations regarding time spans (duration of era) and aging processes, and for weight and density – an excellent way to include numeracy principles alongside the literacy skills associated with speaking and listening throughout the session. 17-18 Ver 1 Grade: 1. Outstanding. 2. Good. Please delete as appropriate 3. Developing. 4. Fail. Further comments on subject specific teaching and/or comments on other aspects of the observed session that may relate to: Planning for learning, Assessment for learning, Promoting Inclusion, Managing teaching and learning, and Professional values and practice. Learning was assessed throughout this session using question and answer. The teacher managed this in an inclusive and informal way, which actually encouraged contributions and learners supporting each other and confirming, or challenging, ideas and suggestions. The whole session was managed in a very professional manner with deepening and extending questions used well to develop learning and differentiation of assessment. Activities were summarised effectively – and I particular note that the learners themselves did most of the summarising presenting yet more opportunity to check learning with directed questions asked and care taken to ensure each learners’ progress was checked. Other assessment strategies used included a quick-quiz and a discussion on personal experiences of different landscapes and environments. All the activities required skilful management and this was achieved using a flexible approach that responded to learner need. Strengths and examples of good practice – 1. Reflect on what works best in your teaching and learning to meet the diverse needs of learners. High level of differentiation throughout the session to meet learners’ needs. • Excellent preparation of artefacts, ILT and session planning. • Group interventions, support and facilitation were managed very well, maintaining an engaging and dynamic learning environment • Range of activities used well to stimulate learners and address different learning styles. • Skilled use of question and answer to deepen, develop and differentiate learning – and check understanding. • Targets (with particular focus on subject specialist targets) to be incorporated into trainee’s Reflective Development Plan in their Professional Portfolio – 10. Evaluate your practice with others and evaluate its impact on learning. Consider keeping notes (maybe on the lesson plan itself) as you go along of any particularly good and interesting points that learners make, or recurring errors, so that these can be revisited when back in the classroom setting. Try to make use of the notes leaners have made on their key question sheets either in the classroom, or as possible revision/review sheets in follow-up sessions. Refer back to these will further encourage their use in the future. Continue to prepare to this level of detail – it is proving very effective! To support the subject content of these sessions try to provide posters around the room that show the characteristics of various rock formations. Perhaps create a ppt or rolling slide show with descriptions but no pictures, and pictures and no words as a quick-quiz/revision tool. Observation by Mentor Observer name (print): Bambam 17-18 Ver 1 Overall Pass / Fail 1 / Fail 2 Please circle as appropriate Observer’s signature: Bambam See attached sheet for guidance on grades in this area of observed practice. 17-18 Ver 1 Observation grading for PGCE/Cert Ed (inc DET) 2017-18 Introduction to role of mentor as observer in this instance – We are very grateful for your support in developing your mentees’ teaching practice through their teacher training programme. The mentor role is a vital one, particularly in relation to subject specialist pedagogy. As well as demonstrating their subject knowledge, through their teaching practice, they must enable their learners to extend their depth and breadth of the subject. Your expertise in teaching your subject specialism will support your mentee in learning how to develop their skills, knowledge and understanding and evaluate the impact their teaching has on learning. Impact of Subject Specialist Teaching on learners and their learning experience: Teaching and learning develops subject specialism as well as English, mathematics, ICT and functional skills to support the achievement of learning goals and career aims Grade 1 - Outstanding Demonstration of excellent subject knowledge and pedagogy which supports and engages learners, with ability to consistently and confidently anticipate and address common errors and misconceptions. Consistent modelling of very high standards of written and spoken communication, maths and ICT, successfully developing these skills in their learners. Employment and design of creative and realistic subject specific assessment activities. Confident and consistent support of knowledge and understanding of FE/HE and relevant employment opportunities, and wider social and environmental contexts. Consistent and confident demonstration of impact on learning through adaption and advancement of subject specialist knowledge and pedagogy. Grade2 - Good Demonstration of well-developed subject knowledge, using different and engaging teaching approaches, with ability to identify, explain and address common errors and misconceptions. Modelling of good standards of written and spoken communication, maths and ICT encouraging and supporting these skills in learners. Ability to design and employ effective and realistic subject specific assessment activities. Ability to support knowledge and understanding of FE/HE and relevant employment opportunities, and wider social and environmental contexts. Demonstrates impact on learning through adaption and advancement of personal subject specialist knowledge and pedagogy. Grade 3 – Developing Application of secure subject knowledge, including accurate and consistent use of subject specific language that engages learners, develops key concepts and addresses common errors and misconceptions. Secure level of personal maths, English and ICT, building these into lessons in support of these skills in learners. Ability to employ suitable and relevant subject specific assessment activities. Ability to identify FE/HE and employment opportunities and relate these to learners. Ability to adapt subject specialist knowledge and pedagogy. Grade 4 - Fail Insufficient knowledge of specialist subject. Failure to select and apply interesting or relevant methods for teaching or assessing learner’s subject specific knowledge and skills as appropriate to 17-18 Ver 1 the group or individual. Failure to adapt, or develop, set subject specialist knowledge or pedagogical targets