Report SEP Rubric 2

advertisement

Science and Engineering Practices

SEP

Asking Questions

Exemplary

Asks precise, testable questions that require sufficient and relevant evidence to answer and

evaluates the testability of the questions.

Discusses predicted relationships,

including quantitative relationships,

between dependent and independent variables and

appropriate controls.

Proficient

Asks

precise

, testable questions that require sufficient and relevant evidence to answer.

Discusses

predicted relationships between dependent and independent variables.

Progressing

Asks testable questions that require sufficient and relevant evidence to answer.

Not Yet

Asks general, imprecise questions that require greater specificity to be testable. Identifies predicted relationships between dependent and independent variables

with minor errors

. Identifies dependent and independent variables with unclear predicted relationships. Developing and using Models

Thoroughly explains

the predicted relationships in the relevant model(s). Designs, explains, and evaluates a model to generate data to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, and/or solve problems.

Identifies

model(s) appropriate control(s) (if applicable) OR relationships in the relevant Designs and explains a model that generates data to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, and/or solve problems. Identifies control(s) OR relationships in the relevant model or models with

minor errors or omissions.

Designs and explains a model that generates data to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, and/or solve problems. Design or explanation of the model includes minor errors or omissions. Uses or tests two different models of the same proposed tool, process, mechanism or system. Uses or tests the model and evaluates the accuracy and limitations of the model to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, or solve problems. Uses or tests the model and evaluates the accuracy and limitations of the model to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, or solve problems. Evaluates the accuracy and limitations of the two different models in order to select a model that best fits the evidence or design criteria. Makes recommendations to revise the model. Explanation or evaluation of model includes minor errors or omissions. Identifies inappropriate controls and/or inappropriate models. Designs and explains a model that generates data to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, and/or solve problems. Design or explanation of the model includes major errors or omissions. Uses or tests the model and identifies the limitations OR accuracy of the model (with errors or omissions) to support explanations, predict phenomena, analyze systems, or solve problems. Explanation or evaluation of the model includes major errors or omissions.

Planning and Carrying Out Investigations Analyzing & Interpreting Data Using Mathematical and Computational Thinking Designs and evaluates an investigation identifying and explaining the variables (dependent, independent, and controls) Identifies possible confounding variables. Includes thorough description of replicable data collection procedures. Justifies the selection of the tools/instrument and type of measurements that will produce relevant data and/or evidence to answer the question(s). Uses appropriate scientific techniques and systematically collects multiple trials (if appropriate) of relevant data consistent within narrow range. Evaluates the consistency (precision) of the data as well as the appropriateness of the data collection procedures. Analyzes and evaluates data using tools, technologies, and/or models in order to identify patterns, to make reasonable and well supported scientific claims (or to determine an optimal design solution). Thoroughly evaluates the limitations of data analysis (e.g., measurement error, sample selection) and provides a detailed explanation of the implications on the findings. Accurately applies appropriate mathematical concepts and methods to represent and solve scientific questions and explains whether the answer “makes sense”. Designs an investigation identifying and explaining the variables (dependent, independent, and controls). Includes sufficiently detailed description of replicable data collection procedures. Describes tools/instrument and type of measurements that will produce relevant data and/or evidence to answer the question(s). Uses appropriate scientific techniques and systematically collects multiple trials (if appropriate) of relevant data consistent within a reasonable range Evaluates the consistency (precision) of the data. Analyzes and explains data using tools, technologies, and/or models in order to identify patterns, to make reasonable and supported scientific claims (or to determine an optimal design solution). Evaluates the limitations of the data analysis (e.g., measurement error, sample selection) and identifies some implications for the findings. Accurately applies appropriate mathematical concepts and methods (e.g., ratio, rate, percent, basic operations, algebra, and functions) to answer scientific questions. Designs an investigation identifying variables (dependent, independent, and controls). Includes data collection procedures that are mostly replicable. Identifies tools/instrument and type of measurements that will produce relevant data and/or evidence to answer the question(s). Uses appropriate scientific techniques and collects multiple trials (if appropriate) of relevant data consistent within a reasonable range. Analyzes and explains data using tools, technologies, and/or models in order to identify patterns, to make reasonable scientific claims (or to determine an optimal design solution). Analysis or explanation includes minor errors or omissions. Identifies the limitations of the data analysis (e.g., measurement error, sample selection). Applies appropriate mathematical concepts or methods relevant to scientific questions or engineering problems, but applies them with minor errors or omissions. Designs an investigation that will produce relevant data but with minimal detail about the variables Includes incomplete description of data collection procedures that impede replication Describes general evidence to be used to answer the question(s) with minimal detail. Uses appropriate scientific techniques and collects multiple trials (if appropriate) of relevant data but the data is not consistent within a reasonable range. Attempts to analyze data using tools, technologies, and/or models in order to identify patterns, to make scientific claims (or to determine an optimal design solution). Analysis or explanation includes major errors or omissions. Identifies the limitations of the data analysis (e.g., measurement error, sample selection) with incomplete or inaccurate elements Identifies mathematical concepts or methods relevant to scientific questions or engineering problems, but applies them with major errors or omissions.

Constructing Explanations Engaging in Argument Construct and revise an explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from a variety of sources (including your own investigations, models, theories, simulations, peer review) and the assumption that theories and laws that describe the natural world operate today as they did in the past and will continue to do so in the future. Apply scientific ideas, principles, and/or evidence to provide an explanation of phenomena, taking into account possible unanticipated effects. Apply scientific reasoning, theory, and/or models to link evidence to the claims to assess the extent to which the reasoning and data support the explanation or conclusion in a unique way.

Compare and evaluate competing arguments in light of currently accepted explanations, new evidence, limitations (e.g., trade-offs), constraints, and ethical issues. Evaluates the claims, evidence, and/or reasoning behind currently accepted to determine the merits of arguments. Construct and revise an explanation based on evidence obtained from a few of sources (including your own investigations, models, theories, simulations, peer review) and the assumption that theories and laws that describe the natural world operate today as they did in the past and will continue to do so in the future. Apply scientific ideas, principles, and/or evidence to provide an explanation of phenomena. Apply scientific reasoning, theory, and/or models to link evidence to the claims to assess the extent to which the reasoning and data support the explanation or conclusion . Compare and begin to evaluate competing arguments in light of currently accepted explanations, new evidence, limitations (e.g., trade-offs), constraints, and ethical issues. Discusses the claims, evidence, and/or reasoning behind currently accepted explanations to determine the merits of arguments. Construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources (including your own experiments) and the assumption that theories and laws that describe the natural world operate today as they did in the past and will continue to do so in the future. Apply scientific ideas, principles, and/or evidence to construct, revise and/or use an explanation for real world phenomena, examples, or events. Apply scientific reasoning to show why the data or evidence is adequate for the explanation or conclusion. Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts. Identifies the claims, evidence, and/or reasoning behind currently accepted explanations to determine the merits of arguments. Use evidence (e.g., measurements, observations, patterns) to construct or support an explanation. Id entify the evidence that supports particular points in an explanation. Identify the evidence that supports particular points in an explanation. Find an explanation on the topic being addressed and discuss it without evaluating or opposing points of view. Includes the claims but not the evidence or reasoning behind currently accepted explanations to determine the merits of arguments. Obtaining, Evaluating and Communicating Information When conducting independent research, selects multiple relevant, high-quality scientific sources representing a variety of viewpoints, and thoroughly evaluates the evidence and credibility of each source. When conducting independent research, selects multiple relevant scientific sources, and evaluates the evidence and credibility of each source. When conducting independent research, selects a limited number of relevant scientific sources and evaluates their credibility minimally. When conducting independent research, relies on one or two relevant sources without evaluating their credibility.

Sources: National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. Center for Assessment, Learning, & Equity (SCALE) & Literacy Design Collaborative April 3, 2015 DRAFT

Download