RAF9059 Consultancy Meeting to Improve the Radiation Protection Curriculum for Radiographers Kelli Welch Haynes, MSRS, RT(R) United States IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency INTRODUCTION TO RADIATION PROTECTION CHAPTER 1 and 2 IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency 3 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. W HAT A RE X-R AYS ? A form of ionizing radiation ▬ Ionizing radiation is radiation that produces positively and negatively charged particles (ions) when passing through matter 4 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. C ONSEQUENCES OF I ONIZATION IN H UMAN C ELLS 5 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. H OW W E C AN S AFELY C ONTROL THE U SE OF “R ADIANT E NERGY ” Employ effective methods to eliminate those hazards Control radiation produced from an x-ray tube and ensure radiation safety during all medical radiation procedures ▬ Limiting the energy deposited in living tissue by radiation can reduce the potential for adverse biologic effects FIGURE 1-1 Radiant energy is emitted from the xray tube in the form of waves (or particles). This manmade energy can be controlled by the selection of equipment components and devices made for this purpose and by the selection of appropriate technical exposure factors Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. 6 EFFECTIVE RADIATION PROTECTION Ongoing responsibility of diagnostic imaging professionals to ensure radiation safety during all medical radiation procedures Effective measures employed by radiation workers to safeguard patients, personnel, and the general public from unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation Unnecessary radiation ▬ Any radiation that does not benefit a person in terms of diagnostic information obtained for the clinical management of medical needs ▬ Any radiation exposure that does not enhance the quality of the study 7 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. N EED TO S AFEGUARD A GAINST S IGNIFICANT AND C ONTINUING R ADIATION E XPOSURE Based on evidence of harmful biologic effects ▬ Damage to living tissue of animals and humans exposed to radiation 8 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. J USTIFICATION AND R ESPONSIBILITY FOR I MAGING P ROCEDURES Benefit vs. risk ▬ Patient can elect to assume the relatively small risk of exposure to ionizing radiation 1. To obtain essential diagnostic medical information when illness or injury occurs 2. When a specific imaging procedure for health screening purposes is prudent 9 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. R ADIATION E XPOSURE TO THE G ENERAL P UBLIC Should always be kept at the lowest possible level 10 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. D IAGNOSTIC E FFICACY ▬ The degree to which the diagnostic study accurately reveals the presence or absence of disease in the patient ▬ Provides the basis for determining whether an imaging procedure or practice is justified 11 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. R ESPONSIBILITY FOR D ETERMINING N ECESSITY OF A P ROCEDURE FOR THE P T Referring physician ▬ Accepts basic responsibility for protecting the pt from unnecessary radiation exposure ▬ Relies on qualified imaging personnel Radiographer and participating radiologist ▬ Share in keeping pt medical radiation exposure at the lowest possible level ▬ Ensure that both occupational and nonoccupational doses remain well below allowable levels 12 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. K EEPING O CCUPATIONAL AND N ONOCCUPATIONAL D OSES W ELL B ELOW M AXIMUM A LLOWABLE L EVELS Use the smallest radiation exposure that will produce useful images Produce optimal images with the first exposure Avoid repeat examinations FIGURE 1-4 A, Posteroanterior chest projection requiring a repeat examination because of multiple external foreign bodies (several necklaces and an underwire bra) that should have been removed before the x-ray examination. 13 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. ALARA PRINCIPLE ALARA ▬ Intention behind these concepts of radiologic practice: ▬ to keep radiation exposure and consequent dose to the lowest possible level 14 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. R ESPONSIBILITY FOR M AINTAINING ALARA 15 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. PATIENT PROTECTION AND PATIENT EDUCATION Educating patients about imaging procedures helps to ensure the highest quality of service Answer questions about the potential risk of radiation exposure honestly Inform patients of what needs to be done, if anything, as a follow-up to their examination (From Radiology and radiation protection: Mosby’s radiographic instructional series, St Louis, 1999, Mosby.) Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. 16 R ISK OF I MAGING P ROCEDURE VS P OTENTIAL B ENEFIT Risk (in general terms) ▬ The probability of injury, ailment, or death resulting from an activity Risk (in the medical industry) with reference to the radiation sciences ▬ The possibility of inducing a radiogenic cancer or genetic defect after irradiation Willingness to accept risk ▬ Perception that the potential benefit to be obtained is greater than the risk involved 17 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. B ACKGROUND E QUIVALENT R ADIATION T IME (BERT) BERT ▬ A method that can be used to reduce patient fears and anxiety ▬ Compares the amount of radiation received with natural background radiation received over a given period of time ▬ Based on annual U.S. population exposure of approximately 3 millisieverts per year (300 millirems per year) 18 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. RADIATION Energy ▬ Ability to do work How radiation relates to energy ▬ Radiation refers to energy that passes from one location to another and can have many manifestations. 19 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. T YPES OF R ADIATION 1. Mechanical vibration of materials a. Ultrasound 2. The electromagnetic wave a. Radio waves b. Microwaves c. Infrared d. Visible light e. Ultraviolet f. X-rays g. Gamma rays 20 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. E LECTROMAGNETIC WAVES In electromagnetic waves, electric and magnetic fields fluctuate rapidly as they travel through space. Electromagnetic waves are characterized by their 1. Frequency 2. Wavelength Dual nature of electromagnetic radiation (wave-particle duality) ▬ This form of radiation can travel through space in the form of a wave but can interact with matter as a particle of energy. 21 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. T HE E LECTROMAGNETIC S PECTRUM Electromagnetic spectrum ▬ The complete range of frequencies and energies of electromagnetic radiation (see Table 1-2 in the textbook). Insert Figure 1-7. 22 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. I ONIZING AND N ONIONIZING R ADIATION 1. Ionizing radiation (x-rays, gamma rays, and high-energy) ultraviolet radiation (energy above 10 eV) 2. Nonionizing radiation (low energy ultraviolet radiation, visible light, infrared rays, microwaves, and radio waves) ▬ Nonionizing radiations do not have sufficient kinetic energy to eject electrons from atoms 23 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. I ONIZING R ADIATION Conversion of atoms to ions Electromagnetic radiation with high enough frequency transfers sufficient energy to orbital electrons to remove them from the atoms to which they were attached Has undesirable result of potentially producing some damage in the biologic material The amount of energy transferred to electrons in biologic tissue by ionizing radiation is the basis of the concept of radiation dose 24 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. PARTICULATE R ADIATION Form of radiation that includes alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, and protons (subatomic particles that are ejected from atoms at very high speeds) Possess sufficient kinetic energy to be capable of causing ionization by direct atomic collision 25 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. A LPHA PARTICLES Emitted from nuclei of very heavy elements, such as uranium and plutonium, during the process of radioactive decay Each contain two protons and two neutrons Are simply helium nuclei Have a large mass and a positive charge twice that of an electron 26 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. A BILITY OF A LPHA PARTICLES TO P ENETRATE M ATTER Particulate radiations vary in their ability to penetrate matter Alpha particles 1. Are less penetrating than beta particles. 2. Lose energy quickly, travel a short distance in biologic matter, so they are considered virtually harmless as an external source of radiation. 3. As an internal source of radiation, can be very damaging if emitted from a radioisotope deposited in the body 27 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. B ETA PARTICLES (B ETA R AYS ) Are identical to high-speed electrons except for their origin Are 8,000 times lighter than alpha particles and have only one unit of electrical charge (-1) as compared with the alpha’s two units of electrical charge (+2) Will not interact as strongly with their surroundings as alpha particles do. Capable of penetrating biologic matter to a greater depth than alpha particles, with far less ionization along their paths. 28 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. H IGH -S PEED E LECTRONS T HAT A RE N OT B ETA R ADIATION Are produced in a radiation oncology treatment machine called a linear accelerator Use ▬ To treat superficial skin lesions in small areas ▬ To deliver radiation boost treatments to breast tumors at tissue depths typically not exceeding 5 to 6 cm 29 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. B ETA R AYS WITH A L ESSER P ROBABILITY OF I NTERACTION Can penetrate matter more deeply and therefore cannot be stopped by an ordinary piece of paper like an external alpha particle Either a thick block of wood or a 1-mm-thick lead shield would be required to absorb them 30 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. P ROTONS Positively charged components of an atom Have a very small mass, which, however, exceeds that of an electron by a factor of 2800 Number of protons in the nucleus of an atom constitutes its atomic number, or “Z” number 31 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. N EUTRONS Are the electrically neutral components of an atom Have approximately the same mass as a proton If two atoms have the same number of protons but a different number of neutrons in their nuclei, they are referred to as isotopes. 32 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. R ADIATION D OSE S PECIFICATION : E QUIVALENT D OSE Equivalent dose (EqD) ▬ A radiation quantity used for radiation protection purposes when a person receives exposure from various types of ionizing radiation ▬ Enables the calculation of the effective dose (EfD) ▬ The SI unit of EqD is the sievert (Sv) ▬ 1 sievert equals 100 rem ▬ Both occupational and nonoccupational dose limits are expressed as EfD and may be stated in sieverts (rem) 33 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. E FFECTIVE D OSE (E F D) Effective dose (EfD) ▬ Takes into account the dose for all types of ionizing radiation to irradiated organs or tissues in the human body ▬ By including weighting factors for specific body parts, EfD takes into account the chance of individual irradiated organs or tissues for developing a radiation-induced cancer 34 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. B IOLOGIC D AMAGE P OTENTIAL Biologic damage ▬ Produced by ionizing radiation while penetrating body tissues primarily by ejecting electrons from atoms composing the tissues Result of destructive radiation interaction at the atomic level ▬ Molecular change ▬ Cellular damage ▬ Organic damage 35 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. S OURCES OF I ONIZING R ADIATION Natural radiation (natural background radiation) ▬ Terrestrial radiation (uranium-238, radium-226 and thorium- 232 in crust of earth) ▬ Cosmic radiation (from the sun (solar) and beyond the solar system (galactic) ▬ Internal radiation from radionuclides Manmade (artificial) radiation ▬ Consumer products ▬ Nuclear fuel ▬ Atmospheric fallout from nuclear weapons testing ▬ Nuclear power plant accidents ▬ Medical radiation 36 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. M EDICAL R ADIATION Medical radiation exposure results from the use of diagnostic x-ray machines and radiopharmaceuticals in medicine The two largest sources of artificial radiation are 1. Diagnostic medical x-ray 2. Nuclear medicine procedures 37 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. VARIABILITY OF P T D OSE FOR I MAGING P ROCEDURES Because of the large variety of radiologic equipment and differences in imaging procedures and in individual radiologist and radiographer technical skills, the patient dose for each examination varies according to the facility providing imaging services The amount of radiation received by a patient may be indicated in terms of 1. Entrance Skin Exposure (ESE) and glandular dose 2. Bone marrow dose 3. Gonadal dose 38 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. R EDUCING O CCURRENCE P OSSIBILITY OF THE OF G ENETIC D AMAGE IN F UTURE G ENERATIONS THE Through efficient application of radiation protection measures on the part of the radiographer. By limiting the widespread substitution by many emergency department facilities of unnecessary CT scans for simple chest x-ray studies. 39 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. N EW D ATA ON M EDICAL R ADIATION E XPOSURE NCRP Report No. 160, released on March 3, 2009, reflects usage patterns through 2006. The number of medical procedures involving ionizing radiation has increased dramatically since the 1980s. Because of this, exposure of the U.S. population from medical sources has increased. Increased use of imaging modalities such as CT and cardiac nuclear medicine examinations NCRP Report No. 160 “estimates the total amount of radiation delivered in 2006 and compares those amounts to the estimates published in 1987” 40 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. D IFFERENCES IN R ADIATION E XPOSURE FROM 1980 TO 1982 AND D ATA FROM 2006 In NCRP Report No. 93, medical radiation was estimated to contribute 0.54 mSv to manmade background radiation. In 2006, that number had increased to 3.0 mSv, an increase of more than a factor of 5. The main reason for the increase is increased usage of CT. With the advent of multislice spiral CT, the utility of this imaging modality in areas such as emergency medicine has increased dramatically. In 1980, use of CT resulted in a collective dose of 3700 personsieverts. In 2006, that number rose to 440,000 person-sieverts. 41 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. M EDICAL B ENEFIT OF CT The use of CT does have tremendous medical benefit in the diagnosis of disease and trauma. New total annual background radiation ▬ The new total annual background radiation, 6.25 mSv per person, is almost twice as large as the old estimate of 3.6 mSv. 42 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. T HE END! Review the questions at the end of the chapter. 43 Copyright © 2011, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1993, 1983 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc.