Instructions Please save your completed review using the filename XXXXXXXX_Review, where XXXXXXXX is the filename you have been sent. So, for example, if you are reviewing the document 12345678.pdf, save it to 12345678_Review.pdf and upload to Moodle. Number of Paper Being Reviewed: Abstract (max 300 words) A concise summary of the whole report. Introduction Clearly introduce the topic to be discussed and state aims and objectives. Description and analysis of the subject Demonstrate that appropriate and varied (Books, Journals, Conferences – not just the Internet) sources of information have been investigated. Appropriate critical analysis of source material Conclusions Clear summary and conclusions drawn on the information presented. Presentation 1500-2000 words Presented clearly and in a logical manner. Correct and concise use of English. Correct use of citation guidelines. Reference points in the text and a full list of references at the end of the document. Harvard (author name/date) or IEEE (numbered) system acceptable. Correct use made of sections and headings. Appropriate diagrams and tables. Total General Comments Marks Comments 18085991.pdf 3/5 The abstract sort of covers the relevant points of the review. No need to mention from what sources the information comes from as it should be clear from the way it is referenced. 3/5 Clear introduction to the topic. I think that using AI to deliver services and supply to remote areas is only one aspect, and other applications should be discussed. 10/20 Some points of the analysis contradict each other first is said that patients are willing to use AI and afterwards is said they don’t trust it. No other applications of AI are discussed except its use in remote communities. No varied opinions are given from other researchers or critical analysis of the literature from the author. Too much in text citations. It will be better if the content of the literature is summarised in the author’s own words. 3/5 The conclusion is not delivered very clearly. No need to mention other sectors as the topic is only health. 8/15 Good structure of the report. Correct use of referencing. When a website is used should say at what date was accessed as the information tend to change on the web. A lot of grammar mistakes. May be English is a second language? The use of shorter sentences will make it easier to understand the author’s thoughts. No diagrams or tables used. The saying is that “a picture is a thousand words”. It might have been helpful. 27/50 Some work needs to be done on using concise and correct English.