LED LIGHTING CONSIDERATIONS Heather Johnson, LC, IES April 23, 2015 Today’s Objectives: How has the LED “revolution” changed the way we figure lighting needs? What has changed, what is the same? How can you be sure you give your customers what they need? What are the important facts to gather? Where can we get easy, accurate, inexpensive calculation software? Lumen Maintenance – Traditional Sources Source: U.S. Department of Energy | Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Source: U.S. Department of Energy | Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Also causing lower light levelsLamps Die! The “average life” is determined when 50% of the lamps initially installed are still operating. 90-100% 70-89% 50-69% Failed Time 12,000 hours Economic vs. Rated Life of Traditional Systems Source: Venture Lighting Lumen Maintenance Comparison HPS PSMH CMH INDUCTION LED (L70) Rated Life (HRS) 24,000 15,000-20,000 15,000-20,000 100,000 50,000-120,000 Lumen Maintenance 70-80% 40-59% 70% 60% 90-95% Mortality Rate 35% 55% 50% 40% ? Lumen Maintenance Comparison Light Loss Factors If leds last “forever” why can’t we use 1.0 for LLF What are the factors that cause light levels to drop How different are these factors from what we’re used to Lumen Maintenance: HID vs. LED The “Old” Story Lumen Maintenance: HID vs. LED The “New” Story Understanding Lumen Maintenance Current Methodology of reporting Lumen Maintenance: 1. Reference singular Lxx values tied to undisclosed operating ambient temperature 2. Intentionally relate the Lxx value to the legacy source (ex: L90 to Fluorescent) 3. Provide reference table for customer to identify implications of anticipated operating ambient temperature So the big difference In using LEDs 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Lumen Maintenance – the light level stays even System Life – much longer, we do not even know yet Energy cost saving$ Better uniformity of Light Ease of controls Instant-on On-off switching Dimming How Long do they Last? 50,000 Hours • • • • • • • 130 Years at 1 hour/day 68.5 Years at 2 hours/day 34.2 Years at 4 hours/day 22.8 Years at 6 hours/day 17.1 Years at 8 hours/day 11.4 Years at 12 hours/day 5.7 Years at 24 hours/day Verify • Ask for proof of lumen maintenance, ask for the LM80 data. This information should be readily available • LEDs can last a very long time, but remember that this is predicated on good thermal performance Choosing an LED lighting systemA long term decision Light Loss Factor – Dirt Depreciation The one factor that has NOT changed in favor of LEDs. In fact, you may need to take out MORE to account for dirt because they will last longer, not be relamped they will not be cleaned BECAUSE they aren’t relamped Luminaire Dirt Depreciation Affects All Systems Category of Luminaire Operating Environment • Clean: filtered air circulation; retail, offices, institutional • Moderate: air enters through windows, doors, non-filtered; light industry or manufacturing • Dirty: normal activities produce significant dirt Industrial Luminaires Industrial Luminaires have 6 maintenance categories, and 15 environments to consider. Dirt Depreciation Over Time Luminaire Dirt Depreciation – LDD (Outdoor) Luminaire Cleaning • Collect recommended cleaning procedures from luminaire manufacturers • Evaluate location types • Determine optimum cleaning frequency. • Do periodic audits • Contrary to expectations, LED luminaires will acquire dirt and need to be cleaned LDD Field Testing Results from DOE Projects LDD ~ 3-5% per year over 1-2 year period. More studies needed. Only 2 sites, very limited data & length of service. LDD/Yr 3.7% 3.0% 5.3% 4.2% To Summarize Light Loss Factors HID, Fluorescent: • LLD x BF x LDD = Total Light Loss Factor • LLD should include mortality • Sometimes Ambient Temperature Factor, Lamp Tilt Factor LED (SSL): • LMF x LDD = Total Light Loss Factor • Sometimes Ambient Temperature Factor Sources of Site Information Where does the project site information come from? Best case What is in-between? Worst case Necessary Data The data needed to complete most jobs is as follows: • • • • • • • • • • Fixture type, spec sheet, & IES file Fixture locations, if existing Mounting height & type Surface reflectances: ceiling, walls, floor (indoors) Footcandle criteria Maintenance plans Light loss factor (LLF) Interior: Ceiling height Exterior: Building height Correctly scaled site or building plan Cad File = Best case PDF Files • Easily transmitted electronically • Easily opened by most everyone • Can be printed to any size • Can magnify and print certain areas • Can be marked using editing tools found within the software • Not easily cleaned of extraneous material • No dimension lines, hard to confirm scale • PDF converting software available • Large file size • Colors and hatching do not convert • Text becomes distorted, sometimes illegible Data Source Type 3 PDF Files- scale?? • Insert example Satellite imagery as survey • Gaining popularity • Saves cost of actual site survey • Image files easily shared electronically • Easier for older sites when no drawings exist • Many sites provide visibility • Google, Zillow, Bing • Heavy landscaping limits visibility • Skewed views are common • Dimensions are estimates or not available • Requires time-consuming AutoCAD trace • Accurate scaling is not possible • “Zooming in” can result in pixilation and fuzziness. Data Source Type 4 Satellite Imagery Example This site looks pretty clear right? Let’s zoom in to find pole locations. Can you outline the shape of that island? Can you tell where that pole is? Can you accurately dimension with those parking spaces? Satellite Imagery Considerations • Tracing can add 2-8 hours of additional work • Landscaping may hinder visibility of pertinent details • If image is old, additions or site modification may not be shown • Incorrect scaling can result in lighting errors • Skewed view will distort shapes Satellite Imagery Considerations Cocktail napkin, verbal description Data Source Type 5 Sources for lighting software • Lighting Manufacturers – Design tools available online – Software program available for a fee – Sophisticated program available for free • Independent software companies – Fairly steep fee to pay for all upkeep, profit – Must pay for training and annual renewal