Shear-free Dust Solution in General Covariant Hořava-Lifshitz Gravity
O. Goldoni 1 ,∗ M.F.A. da Silva 1 ,† and R. Chan
2‡
1
arXiv:1509.02685v3 [gr-qc] 18 Dec 2015
Departamento de Fı́sica Teórica, Instituto de Fı́sica,
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524,
Maracanã 20550-900, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
2
Coordenação de Astronomia e Astrofı́sica, Observatório Nacional,
Rua General José Cristino, 77, São Cristóvão 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
(Dated: December 21, 2015)
In this paper, we have studied non stationary dust spherically symmetric spacetime, in general
covariant theory (U (1) extension) of the Hořava-Lifshitz gravity with the minimally coupling and
non-minimum coupling with matter, in the post-newtonian approximation (PPN) in the infrared
limit. The Newtonian prepotential ϕ was assumed null. The aim of this work is to know if we can
have the same spacetime, as we know in the General Relativity Theory (GRT), in Hořava-Lifshitz
Theory (HLT) in this limit. We have shown that there is not an analogy of the dust solution in
HLT with the minimally coupling, as in GRT. Using non-minimum coupling with matter, we have
shown that the solution admits a process of gravitational collapse, leaving a singularity at the end.
This solution has, qualitatively, the same temporal behaviour as the dust collapse in GRT. However,
we have also found a second possible solution, representing a bounce behavior that is not found in
GRT.
PACS numbers: 04.50.Kd; 98.80.-k; 98.80.Bp
I.
INTRODUCTION
The construction of a Quantum Theory of Gravitation
is one of the unsolved problems of modern physics. The
biggest challenge faced by all the researchers, who have
tried to build a new gravitation theory, is that this new
theory must be valid at all scales. Since the gravity force
is a relatively weak one, it is not expected to be observed
any of its quantum effects. For this reason the criteria
that a new candidate quantum gravity theory must fulfill
are constrained by mathematical and self-consistency criteria, reproducing observable results, confirming General
Relativity Theory, and finally, making non-trivial predictions that may possibly be tested.
Hořava-Lifshitz gravity theory (HLT) [1] [2] has drawn
a lot of interest primarily due to its properties to solve the
perturbative non-renormalizability of quantized standard
Einstein gravity at the expense of breaking relativistic invariance at very high energies, while restoring it at low
energies. After that, further deep connections of HořavaLifshitz formalism to condensed matter physics were discovered within the framework of gauge/gravity duality
(holography).
Unfortunately, the original Hořava formulation was
contaminated by a number of serious problems which has
caused the development of various non-trivial modifications. One of the promising latter modifications is the
one without the so called projectability condition and
with an additional Abelian gauge symmetry, which in
particular solves the problem with the unphysical scalar
∗ Electronic
address: otaviosama@gmail.com
address: mfasnic@gmail.com
‡ Electronic address: chan@on.br
† Electronic
graviton. Due to the extensive works in this area, we
suggest to the reader the references [3]-[38].
In order to establish the physical relevance of any modification of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity it is very important to
check that the latter reproduces the known physically feasible properties of standard Einstein General Relativity
(EGR) at low energies. Within this condition, we have
checked whether the non-projectable version of HořavaLifshitz gravity with the extra U(1) gauge symmetry contains in the low energy limit solutions of Vaidya-type [42].
The answer was negative and, therefore, led us to the
important conclusion that in order to establish consistency with EGR at low energies the gauge field associated
with the extra U(1) gauge symmetry of the enlarged nonprojectable Hořava-Lifshitz gravity should have some interaction with the pure radiation matter generating the
Vaidya spacetime geometry.
Lin et al. (2014) [41], have proposed a universal coupling between the gravity and matter in the framework of
the Hořava-Lifshitz theory of gravity with an extra U(1)
symmetry for both the projectable and non-projectable
cases. Then, using this universal coupling they have studied the PPN approximations and they have obtained the
PPN parameters in terms of the coupling constants of
the theory.
Goldoni et al. (2014) [42], using Lin at al. (2014) [41]
approximation, have shown that there is not an analogy
of the Vaidya’s solution in Hořava-Lifshitz Theory (HLT)
without projectability, as we know in General Relativity
Theory (GRT).
In another recent paper, Goldoni et al. (2015) [43],
using again Lin at al. (2014) [41] approach, have also
shown that there is not an analogy of the Vaidya’s solution in Hořava-Lifshitz Theory (HLT) with the minimally
coupling and without projectability, again as we know in
GRT.
2
The goal of this present paper is to study the behavior
of a dust fluid solution of GRT in HLT for the infrared
limit.
We want to know if we can have the same spacetime,
as we know in GRT, in HLT in this limit.
Using again the results of Lin et al. (2014) [41] we have
studied the spherically symmetric spacetime filled by a
dust fluid, in general covariant theory (U (1) extension)
of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity with a minimally coupling [41],
in the PPN approximation and in the infrared limit. We
will analyze if a solution like this one can be described in
the general covariant HLT of gravity [22, 23]. In Section
II we present a brief introduction to HLT with the minimally coupling [41] considered here and present the field
equations of HLT modified. In Section III we show the
dust solution in the infrared limit. In Section IV we discuss the results. Finally, in the Appendix A we present
some quantities necessary in HLT field equations with
minimally coupling [41].
first terms in F and Ω to unity, we have used the freedom to rescale the units of time and space. We also have
Ñi = Ω2 (Ni + N ∇i ϕ) , g̃ ij = Ω−2 g ij .
Considering the exposed before, the matter action can
be written as
Sm =
2
g̃ij = Ω gij ,
(2)
with
F = 1 − a1 σ,
Ω = 1 − a2 σ,
(3)
where
σ ≡
A−A
,
N
1
A ≡ −ϕ̇ + N i ∇i ϕ + N ∇i ϕ (∇i ϕ) ,
2
dtd3 xÑ
p
g̃ L̃m Ñ , Ñi , g̃ij ; ψn ,
ρH (EGR) = Tµν nµ nν ≡ J t = −
(4)
and where A and ϕ are the gauge field and the Newtonian prepotential, respectively, and a1 and a2 are two
arbitrary coupling constants. Note that by setting the
(6)
δ(Ñ L̃m )
δ(Ñ )
S i (EGR) = −Tµν h(4)iµ nν ≡ J i =
where the non-projectability condition imposes that N =
N (t, xi ).
In the work of Lin et al. (2014) [41] it is proposed
that, in the IR limit, it is possible to have matter fields
universally couple to the ADM components through the
transformations
Ñ = F N, Ñ i = N i + N g ij ∇j ϕ,
Z
where ψn collectively stands for matter fields. One can
then define the matter stress-energy in the ADM decomposition, with the minimally coupling. The different
components are given by (for the details see [41])
II. GENERAL COVARIANT
HOŘAVA-LIFSHITZ GRAVITY WITH
COUPLING WITH MATTER
In this section, we shall give a very brief introduction
to the general covariant HLT gravity with the minimally
coupling. For detail, we refer readers to [22, 23, 41].
The Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) form is given by
[39],
ds2 = −N 2 dt2 + gij dxi + N i dt dxj + N j dt ,
(i, j = 1, 2, 3),
(1)
(5)
δ(Ñ L̃m )
δ(Ñi )
S ij (EGR) = Tµν h(4)iµ h(4)jν ≡
√
2 δ(Ñ g̃ L̃m )
ij
,
τ = √
δ(g̃ij )
Ñ g̃
(7)
where h(4) µν is the projection operator, defined as
h(4) µν ≡ g (4) µν +nµ nν and nµ is the normal vector to the
hypersurface t = constant, defined as nµ = N1 (−1, N i ).
Before, the prime and dot denotes the partial differentiation in relation to the coordinate r and t, respectively.
Thus, the total action of the theory can be written as,
Z
√ S = ζ 2 dtd3 x gN LK − LV + LA + Lϕ + LS +
1
,
(8)
L
M
ζ2
where g = det(gij ), N is given in the equation (1) and
LK = Kij K ij − λK 2 ,
1
LV = γ0 ζ 2 − β0 ai ai − γ1 R + 2 γ2 R2 + γ3 Rij Rij
ζ
"
2
2
1
+ 2 β1 a i a i + β2 a i i + β3 a i a i a j j
ζ
#
+β4 aij aij + β5 ai ai R + β6 ai aj Rij + β7 Rai i
#
"
1
i 2
ij
,
+ 4 γ5 Cij C + β8 ∆a
ζ
AR
,
N
ij
= ϕG 2Kij + ∇i ∇j ϕ + ai ∇j ϕ
h
2
i
+(1 − λ) ∆ϕ + ai ∇i ϕ + 2 ∆ϕ + ai ∇i ϕ K
LA = −
Lϕ
3
h
1
+ Ĝ ijlk 4 (∇i ∇j ϕ) a(k ∇l) ϕ
3
+ 5 a(i ∇j) ϕ a(k ∇l) ϕ + 2 ∇(i ϕ aj)(k ∇l) ϕ
i
+6Kij a(l ∇k) ϕ ,
LS = σ(σ1 ai ai + σ2 ai i ),
where
(9)
MSi
where
ζ2 =
1
,
16πG
C ij
Ji
(10)
where G denotes the Newtonian constant, LM is the Lagrangian of matter fields, Ĝ ijlk = g il g jk − g ij g kl [30].
Here ∆ ≡ g ij ∇i ∇j and all the coefficients, βn and γn ,
are dimensionless and arbitrary. Cij denotes the Cotton
tensor, defined by
1
eikl
= √ ∇k Rlj − Rδlj ,
g
4
(11)
π ij
with
aS = σ1 ai ai + σ2 aii ,
where
Gk =
1 ij
G (2Kij + ∇i ∇j ϕ + a(i ∇j) ϕ)
2
1
G ij ∇j ∇i (N ϕ) − G ij ∇j (N ϕai )
+
2N
2
1
− Ĝ ijkl ∇(k (al) N Kij ) + ∇(k (al) N ∇i ∇j ϕ)
N
3
2
5
− ∇(j ∇i) (N a(l ∇k) ϕ) + ∇j (N ai ak ∇l ϕ)
3
3
2
+ ∇j (N aik ∇l ϕ) + ΣS
3
1−λ
∇2 [N (∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ) ]
+
N
3
1 3 5
R − RRij Rij + 3Rji Rkj Rik + R∆R
2
2
8
(12)
+ (∇i Rjk ) ∇i Rjk + ∇k Gk ,
1 jk
3
R ∇j R − Rij ∇j Rik − R∇k R.
2
8
(13)
The Ricci and Riemann tensors Rij and Ri jkl all refer
to the 3-metric gij , with Rij = Rkikj and
Rijkl = gik Rjl + gjl Rik − gjk Ril − gil Rjk
1
− (gik gjl − gil gjk ) R,
2
1
Kij ≡
(−ġij + ∇i Nj + ∇j Ni ) ,
2N
1
Gij ≡ Rij − gij R,
2
N,i
ai ≡
, aij ≡ ∇j ai ,
N
−∇i [N (∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)ai ]
2
i
+∇ (N K) − ∇ (N Kai ) = 8πGJϕ ,
ΣS
where Ni is defined in the ADM form of the metric [39],
given by equation (1).
The variations of the action S (8) with respect to N
and N i give rise to the Hamiltonian and momentum constraints,
MSi
(19)
where,
1
= −
2N
−∇k
(14)
LK + LV + FV − Fϕ − Fλ + HS = 8πGJ t ,
(18)
and FV , Fϕ and Fλ are given in the Appendix A.
Variations of S with respect to ϕ and A yield, respectively,
with e123 = 1. Using the Bianchi identities, one can show
that Cij C ij can be written in terms of the five independent sixth-order derivative terms in the form
Cij C ij =
σ2
2σ1
∇i ai (A − A) − ∇2 (A − A)
N
N
1
j
+ aS ∇j ϕ∇ ϕ,
2
1
= − aS ∇i ϕ,
2
δLM
δ(N LM )
= −N
, Jt = 2
,
δNi
δN
= −K ij + λKg ij ,
(17)
HS =
(15)
+ ∇j π ij − (1 − λ)g ij ∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ
ij
ijkl
− ϕG − Ĝ al ∇k ϕ = 8πGJ i , (16)
(
1 ∂ √
[ gaS ]
√
g ∂t
k
k
N + N ∇ ϕ aS
)
(20)
and
R − aS = 8πGJA ,
(21)
δ(N LM )
δLM
, JA = 2
.
δϕ
δA
(22)
where
Jϕ = −
On the other hand, the variation of S with respect to
gij yields the dynamical equations,
1 ∂ √ ij gπ + 2(K ik Kkj − λKK ij )
√
gN ∂t
4
1
1
− g ij LK + ∇k (π ik N j + π kj N i − π ij N k )
2
N
1
1
ij
ij
+F − FS − g ij LS + Faij − g ij LA + Fϕij
2
2
1
ij
ij 2
j i
− (AR + g ∇ A − ∇ ∇ A) = 8πGτ ij ,
N
A.
(23)
Shear-free Dust Solution with the Minimally
Coupling in the Infrared Limit
In order to be consistent with observations in the infrared limit [41], we assume that
β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = β5 = β6 = β7 = β8 = β9 = 0,
(29)
where
√
2 δ( gN LM )
,
τ ij = √
gN
δgij
γ0 = γ2 = γ3 = γ4 = γ5 = γ6 = γ7 = γ8 = γ9 = 0, (30)
(24)
and F ij , FSij , Faij and Fϕij are given in the Appendix A.
From reference [41], we have that
and for the PPN approximation in minimally coupling
theory, we have
β0 = −2(γ1 + 1),
(31)
a1 = a2 = 0,
(32)
σ1 = 0,
(33)
σ2 = 4(1 − a1 ) = 4.
(34)
Ñ = Ñ (N, Ni , gij , A, ϕ),
Ñi = Ñi (N, Ni , gij , A, ϕ),
g̃ij = g̃ij (N, Ni , gij , A, ϕ).
(25)
Thus,
J t = 2Ω3
(
−ρ
)
δ Ñ
δ Ñi i 1 δg̃ij ij
.
+
S + Ñ
S
δN
δN
2 δN
Thus, we have the vanishing of the cosmological constant,
as follows
(26)
Λg ≡
Similarly, it can be shown that
J
i
=
τ ij =
JA =
Jϕ =
(
J t = −2ρ.
B ≡ −Ω
3
2a2 (1 − a2 σ) k
a1 ρ −
S (Nk + N ∇k ϕ)
N
)
−a2 (1 − a1 σ) (1 − a2 σ) gij S ij .
(28)
Note that, if we use the projectable case of HLT then
LS = 0, MSi = 0, HS = 0, ΣS = 0 and aS = 0. In order
to have these quantitities in HLT, it is only necessary the
non-projectability condition [41].
(36)
Now we consider the case of a shear-free dust [40].
Thus, the metric can be rewritten as
(37)
ds2 = −dt2 + Y (r, t)2 f (r)2 dr2 + dΩ2 .
Using the equations (1) and (14), we have
Krr = −Ẏ Y f 2 ,
(38)
Kθθ = −Ẏ Y,
(39)
Kφφ = sin(θ)2 Kθθ ,
(40)
where
(
(35)
Besides, In the infrared limit we must have
)
δ Ñ
δ Ñk k 1 δg̃kl kl
,
+
S + Ñ
S
−Ω − ρ
δNi
δNi
2 δNi
)
(
2Ω3
δ Ñ
δ Ñk k 1 δg̃kl kl
,
−ρ
+
S + Ñ
S
N
δgij
δgij
2 δgij
)
(
δ Ñk k 1 δg̃kl kl
δ Ñ
3
,
+
S + Ñ
S
2Ω − ρ
δA
δA
2 δA
(
h
i
1
1
√
−
√ (B g),t − ∇i B N i + N ∇i ϕ
N
g
)
(27)
− ∇i N Ω5 S i ,
3
1 2
ζ γ0 = 0.
2
Ẏ
,
Y
(41)
f ′ Y ′ Y − f Y ′ Y + f Y ′2
,
fY 2
(42)
f ′ Y ′ − Y ′′ f − f 3
,
f 3Y
(43)
K = −3
Rrr = 2
Rθθ =
Rφφ = sin(θ)2 Rθθ ,
(44)
5
R=2
2f ′ Y ′ Y − 2Y ′′ f Y − f ′ f Y ′2 + f 3 Y 2
,
f 3Y 4
(45)
From the dynamical equations (23) we have
Drr = 8πτ rr =
3Ẏ 2 (1 − 3λ)
,
Y2
(46)
2f ′ Y ′ Y − 2f Y ′′ Y − f Y ′2 + f 3 Y 2
,
f 3Y 4
(47)
LK =
LV = 2γ1
4
where
(1 − 3λ)(2f 2 Ÿ Y 3 +
f 2 Ẏ 2 Y 2 ),
(48)
Dθθ = 8πτ θθ =
[f 4 Y 5 A′ (f ′ Y − 2f Y ′′ ) − 4f ′′′′ f 2 Y ′ Y 3 +
2
2
2
48f ′ Y ′ Y 3 + 48f ′ f Y ′′ Y 3 − 84f ′ f Y ′ Y 2 −
20f ′ f 2 Y ′′′ Y 3 + 100f ′ Y ′′ Y ′ Y 2 −
′3
′ 2
3
80f f Y Y + 4f Y
′′′′
′′ 2
2
3
28f Y
′′′
3
− 16f Y
′2
3
′2
2
Y − 84f f Y Y −
2
(49)
2
′2
192f ′3Y ′ Y 3 + 192f ′2f Y ′′ Y 3 − 336f ′2 f Y Y 2 −
3
80f ′ f 2 Y ′′′ Y 3 + 400f ′ f 2 Y ′′ Y ′ Y 2 − 320f ′f 2 Y ′ Y +
4f ′ f 4 Y ′ Y 5 γ1 + 16f 4 Y ′′′′ Y 3 − 112f 3 Y ′′′ Y ′ Y 2 −
2
64f 4 Y ′′ Y 2 + 352f 3 Y ′′ Y ′ Y − 4f 5 Y ′′ Y 4 γ1 +
5
′2
2
3
16f Y Y − 160f Y
7
2
′4
5
′
7
6
48f Y Y − 9λf Ẏ Y + 3f Ẏ Y +
2f 7 Y 6 γ1 ],
Jr =
JA =
2
f 3Y 4
(59)
(1 − 3λ)(Ẏ ′ Y − Ẏ Y ′ )
Y2
(50)
(51)
2
[2f ′ Y ′ Y − 2f Y ′′ Y − f Y ′ + f f 3 Y 2 ], (52)
(60)
2f ′ y1′ y1 y22 − 2f y1′′ y1 y22 − f (y1′ y2 )2 + f 3 (y1 y2 )2 = 0.
(61)
Solving the above equation for f (r) we have that
f (r) = q R
2
(y1′ )2 y22
(y1′ )2 y22
dr
y1
,
1
f 3Y 5
×
[3(1 − λ)(f ′ Ẏ ′ Y 2 + f Ẏ Y ′ Y − f Ẏ ′′ Y 2 ) +
f Y ′′ Ẏ Y +
3λ(f ′ Y ′ Ẏ Y − f Y ′′ Ẏ Y + f Y ′2 Ẏ − 3f 3 Ẏ Y 4 ) −
f ′ Y ′ Ẏ Y + f Y ′′ Ẏ Y − 2f Y ′2 Ẏ + f 3 Ẏ Y 2 ].
(53)
(62)
+ c1
where c1 is a constant of integration.
Since f depends only on the coordinate r, then there
is always a combination of the functions y1 and y2 in
the equation (62) that probably transforms its right side
independent of the coordinate t. Substituting now, the
function f (r) into Jϕ = 0, from equation (53), we get
that
y2 (t) = c2 ,
Jϕ =
(58)
Taking the above condition and imposing that JA = 0,
from equation (52), we obtain
4
+ 2f Y Y γ1 −
6
Jr = 0.
Y (r, t) = y1 (r)y2 (t).
144f ′′ f ′ f Y ′ Y 3 − 64f ′′ f 2 Y ′′ Y 3 + 122f ′′f 2 Y ′ Y 2 −
3
and
Using the equation (51), combined with equation (59),
we have that
1
H = 8πJ = 7 8 ×
f Y
[4f 4 Y 5 A′ (f ′ Y − f Y ′ ) − 16f ′′′ f 2 Y ′ Y 3 +
t
′2
(57)
For a spacetime filled by a dust fluid without pressure
we have that
2
4f 5 Y ′′ Y 3 − 40f 3 Y ′4 − 12f 5 Y ′ Y 2 ],
5
(56)
Dφφ = 8πτ φφ = sin(θ)2 Dθθ .
Y + 88f 3 Y ′′ Y ′ Y +
2
dθθ
,
2f 3 Y 6
(2f 3 Ẏ Y 3 + f 3 Ẏ 2 Y 2 ),
2
36f ′′ f ′ Y ′ Y 3 − 16f ′′ f Y ′′ Y 3 + 28f ′′ f 2 Y ′ Y 3 −
3
(55)
dθθ = −2A′′ f Y 2 + 2A′ f ′ Y 2 + 2(A + γ1 ) ×
(f ′ Y ′ Y − f Y ′′ Y + f Y ′2 ) + (1 − 3λ) ×
×
f 7Y 8
(54)
drr = 2[(A − γ1 )Y ′2 + (A + γ1 )f 2 Y 2 ] − 4A′ Y ′ Y +
FV = 0,
HS =
drr
,
2f 4 Y 6
(63)
where c2 is an arbitrary constant.
This last equation shows that the function Y does not
depend on t, i.e., Y (r, t) = Y (r). Thus, we can rewrite
the equation (62) as
f (r) = q R
2
(Y ′ )2
(Y ′ )2
Y dr
,
+ c1
(64)
6
where we have renamed the arbritrary constant c1 as c1 ≡
c1 /c22 .
From the equation (64) we can conclude that the spacetime is stationary, i.e., there is not collapse for this kind
of fluid in the IR limit of HLT. This result is in contrast
with GRT, where it is well known that there is collapse
for a pressureless fluid, possibly forming at the end a
black hole.
Let us now show that the density energy is stationary
as well, supporting the conclusion of the existence of a
stationary spacetime.
Since τ rr = 0 and Y (r, t) = Y (r) we can write from
equation (55) that
2[(A − γ1 )Y ′2 + (A + γ1 )f 2 Y 2 ] − 4A′ Y ′ Y = 0.
Ñ = 1 − A,
(73)
Ñ i = N i ,
(74)
g̃ij = gij ,
(75)
A = 0,
(76)
σ = A.
(77)
With these new parameters we have found that
(65)
J t = −2ρ(1 − A),
(78)
J i = 0,
(79)
τ ij = 0,
(80)
JA = −2ρ,
(81)
From this equation we can derive A′ obtaining A′′ .
Since τ θθ = 0 and substituting the expressions for A′
and A′′ in terms of A into equation (57), we can show
that
A(r, t) = A(r).
(66)
Using the equations (36) and (50) and taking into account that A(r, t) = A(r), we can show that
ρ(r, t) = ρ(r).
Jϕ =
(67)
This is an expected result since the metric is independent of the coordinate t. Thus, we have proved that the
spacetime is stationary.
However, it had already been shown in the reference
[41] that the projectable version of HLT excludes the minimally coupling with matter. Therefore , in the case of
dust fluid, for which the metric is projectable, it was confirmed again in this Section, as our results have led to a
static metric with a fluid density of dust ρ(r, t) = ρ(r),
contradicting the behavior of a such model with the same
fluid in GRT.
B. Shear-free Dust Solution with the
Non-Minimum Coupling in the Infrared Limit
(68)
H = 8πJ t =
1
[(1 − 3λ)(3Ẏ 2 f 3 Y 2 ) − 4f ′ Y ′ f Y +
f 3Y 4
4Y ′′ f Y − 2f 2 Y ′2 − 2f 3 Y 2 ],
(83)
Jr =
JA =
Jϕ =
1
(1 − 3λ)(Ẏ ′ − Ẏ Y ′ ),
f 2Y 4
2
(2f ′ Y ′ Y − 2f Y ′′ Y + f Y ′2 + f 3 Y 2 ),
f 3Y 4
1
f 3Y 5
(84)
(85)
[3(1 − λ)(f ′ Ẏ ′ Y 2 + f Ẏ ′ Y ′ Y − f Ẏ ′′ Y 2 ) +
f Y ′′ Ẏ Y + (1 − 3λ)(f Y ′′ Ẏ Y − f ′ Y ′ Ẏ Y ) +
(3λ − 2)f Y ′2 Ẏ + f 3 Ẏ Y 2 ].
(86)
From the dynamical equations we get
Drr = 8πτ rr =
a1 = 1,
(82)
Thus,
Let us now analyze the case where it exists a nonminimum coupling with matter [41]. In this case we have
the following conditions,
γ1 = −1,
1
(Y ρ̇ + 3Ẏ ρ).
Y
(69)
drr
,
2f 4 Y 6
(87)
where
a2 = 0,
F = 1 − A,
Ω = 1,
(70)
(71)
(72)
drr = 2[(1 − A)(Y ′2 − f 2 Y 2 )] − 4A′ Y ′ Y +
(1 − 3λ)(2f 2 Ÿ Y 3 + f 2 Ẏ 2 Y 2 ),
Dθθ = 8πτ θθ =
dθθ
,
2f 3 Y 6
(88)
(89)
7
where
dθθ = 2A′ f ′ Y 2 − 2A′′ f Y 2 + 2(1 − A) ×
(f ′ Y ′ Y + f Y ′′ Y − f Y ′2 ) +
(1 − 3λ)(2f 3 Ÿ 3 + f 3 Ẏ 2 Y 2 ),
(90)
Dφφ = 8πτ φφ = Dθθ sin2 θ.
(91)
where c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants.
Since the first solution Y (r, t) = 0 is not possible, the
only solution is the second one. Substituting this solution
into the equation (94) we obtain that A(r, t) = A(r).
Now, solving the equation for Jϕ and using the equations (78) to (86) we have that
and
Therefore, for a spacetime filled by a fluid of dust with
zero pressure and shear-free, we have Jr = 0, as in Section IV. Thus, solving equation (84) for the metric function Y (r, t), we have found that the solution admits separation of variables , i.e.,
Y (r, t) = y1 (r)y2 (t).
(92)
From equations (78) and (81), we have that
A=1−
Jt
,
JA
(93)
= 3(3λ − 1)y14 ẏ2 f 3 + 4y12 f 3 − 8y1′′ y1 f + 4y1 ′2 f +
−1
8f ′ y1 ′ y1 ] 2(f 3 y12 + 2f ′ y1 ′ y1 − 2y1′′ f y1 + y1 ′2 f )
.
(94)
Then, we derive the above equation once and twice in
relation to r, in order to find the expressions for A′ and
A′′ . With these results, we can use to the dynamic equations (87) and (89) , which are identically zero. Although
we know the expression for A, the resulting equations are
very difficult to be solved individually. However, we can
notice that
f drr = 2[f (1 − A)(Y ′2 − f 2 Y 2 )] − 4f A′ Y ′ Y +
(1 − 3λ)(2f 3 Ÿ Y 3 + f 3 Ẏ 2 Y 2 ) = 0.
(95)
Thus, we can write that
4f A′ Y ′ Y − 2[f (1 − A)(Y ′2 − f 2 Y 2 )] =
(1 − 3λ)(2f 3 Ÿ Y 3 + f 3 Ẏ 2 Y 2 ),
c1 ρ1 (r) + F (r)
,
(c1 t + c2 )3
(100)
where the function ρ1 (r) and the arbitrary function F (r)
are dependent only to r.
Using the equation (81) for JA we get that
ρ=−
2f ′ Y ′ Y − 2f Y ′′ Y + f Y ′2 + f 3 Y 2
.
f 3Y 4
(101)
Using the equations (85) and (100) we get three possible solutions:
1. f (r) = 0, which is physically impossible,
2. c1 = 0, which gives the same results without the
minimally coupling,
thus
A
ρ(r, t) =
3. F (r) = 0, which allows the density ρ dependent of
t, i.e., ρ(r, t).
With the third condition, we obtain that
ρ(r, t) =
c1 ρ1 (r)t
.
(c1 t + c2 )3
(102)
We can see that the non-minimum coupling produces
interesting results. It is still necessary analyze the temporal behavior of the energy density, in order to verify
if this solution admits a gravitational collapse process,
as expected in GRT. Thus, deriving the energy density
given in the equation (102), we get
ρ̇(r, t) =
c1 ρ1 (r)(c2 − 2c1 t)
.
(c1 t + c2 )4
(103)
Analyzing ρ(r, t) at t = 0, we have
(96)
where the right hand of this equation can be substituted
in equation (95), giving
2A′ f ′ Y 2 − 2A′′ f Y 2 + 2(1 − A)(f Y ′ Y + f Y ′′ Y −
f Y ′2 + 4f A′ Y ′ Y − 2[f (1 − A)(Y ′2 − f 2 Y 2 )] = 0.
(97)
Again, as in previous Section, solving this last equation in relation to y1 (r) and y2 (t), we get two possible
solutions
Y (r, t) = 0,
(98)
Y (r, t) = y1 (r)(c1 t + c2 ),
(99)
or
ρ̇(r, t = 0) =
c1 ρ1 (r)
.
c32
(104)
Since the energy density as well as its temporal rate of
change should be always positive, in order to insure a
physically acceptable collapsing fluid, we have to impose
some conditions on the constants c1 , c2 and on the function ρ1 (r).
Let us study two cases: Case (1) ρ1 (r) > 0 and Case
(2) ρ1 (r) < 0 (see Figure 1).
1. Since ρ ≥ 0, them c1 and c2 must have the same
signs. Besides, when ρ̇ > 0 then 0 ≤ t < tc1 and
ρ̇ < 0 then t > tc1 , where t = tc1 = |c1 |/(2|c2 |)
represents the time of the inversion of sign of ρ̇.
Thus, this case describes a situation of an initial
contraction followed by an expansion, without the
formation of a singularity.
8
Note that we have also found a second possible solution,
representing a bounce behavior that is not expected in
GRT.
Acknowledgments
The financial assistance from FAPERJ/UERJ
(MFAS) are gratefully acknowledged.
The author (RC) acknowledges the financial support from
FAPERJ (no. E-26/171.754/2000, E-26/171.533/2002,
E-26/170.951/2006, E-26/110.432/2009 and
E-26/111.714/2010). The authors (RC and MFAS) also
acknowledge the financial support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientı́fico e Tecnológico CNPq - Brazil (no. 450572/2009-9, 301973/2009-1 and
477268/2010-2). The author (MFAS) also acknowledges
the financial support from Financiadora de Estudos e
Projetos - FINEP - Brazil (Ref. 2399/03). The authors
(OG and MFAS) also thank the financial support from
CAPES/Science without Borders (no. A 045/2013). We
also would like to thank Dr. Anzhong Wang for helpful
discussions and comments about this work.
IV.
FIG. 1: Temporal behavior of the density ρ(r, t), given by
equation (102). For ρ1 > 0 we have used the values ρ1 = 1,
c1 = 1 and c2 = 1, where t = tc1 represents the time of the
inversion of sign of ρ̇. For ρ1 < 0 we have used the values
ρ1 = −1, c1 = 1 and c2 = −1, where t = tc2 denotes the time
of divergence of ρ̇.
The quantities F ij , FSij , Faij , Fϕij and FSij are given by
F
2. Again, since ρ ≥ 0, thus c1 and c2 must have the opposite signs. Besides, when ρ̇ > 0 then 0 ≤ t < tc2
and ρ → ∞ at t = tc2 = |c2 |/|c1 |. Thus, this case
describes a typical gravitational collapse situation,
which is consistent with the results of GRT.
III.
CONCLUSION
In this present work, using again the results of Lin et
al. (2014) [41] we have studied the spherically symmetric
spacetime filled by a dust fluid, in general covariant theory (U (1) extension) of HLT with the minimally coupling
[41], in the PPN approximation in the infrared limit. We
have analyzed if a solution like this one can be described
in the general covariant HLT of gravity [22, 23].
Although we do not have a realistic model, we can
describe the gravitational collapse as we can see in GRT.
Besides, confirming what was found in the reference [41],
the projectable HLT excludes the minimally coupling,
and it does not reproduce the well known results in GRT.
However, when using non-minimum coupling with
matter, we have shown that the solution admits a process
of gravitational collapse, leaving a singularity at the end.
APPENDIX A: DEFINITION OF F ij , FSij , Faij ,
Fϕij AND FSij
ij
√
1 δ(− gN LR
V)
= √
gN
δgij
X
=
γ̂s ζ ns (Fs )ij , nb
(105)
s=0
FSij = −σ σ1 ai aj + σ2 aij
aS
N (i ∇j) ϕ
+
(∇i ϕ)(∇j ϕ) + 2
2
N
σ2 (i j)
ij σ2
∇k [ak (A − A)],
+ ∇ [a (A − A)] − g
N
2N
√
1 δ(− gN LaV )
ij
Fa = √
gN
δgij
X
=
(106)
βs ζ ms (Fsa )ij ,
s=0
Fϕij
√
ϕ
1 δ(− gN LV )
= √
gN
δgij
X
=
µs (Fsϕ )ij ,
s=0
FSij = −σ σ1 ai aj + σ2 aij
N (i ∇j) ϕ
aS
(∇i ϕ)(∇j ϕ) + 2
+
2
N
σ2 (i j)
ij σ2
+ ∇ [a (A − A)] − g
∇k [ak (A − A)],
N
2N
(107)
9
with
γ̂s =
ns =
ms =
µs =
5
3
1
1
γ0 , γ1 , γ2 , γ3 , γ5 , − γ5 , 3γ5 , γ5 , γ5 , γ5 ,
2
2
8
2
(2, 0, −2, −2, −4, −4, −4, −4, −4, −4),
(0, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −2, −4),
4 5 2
(108)
2, 1, 1, 2, , , , 1 − λ, 2 − 2λ .
3 3 3
Thus, FV , Fϕ and Fλ are given, respectively, by
"
#
β1
i 2
k i
i
i
FV = β0 (2ai + ai a ) − 2 3(ai a ) + 4∇i (ak a a )
ζ
"
#
β2
2 2
i 2
k
+ 2 (ai ) + ∇ (N ak )
ζ
N
"
#
β3
1 2
j i
i j
i
+ 2 − (ai a )aj − 2∇i (aj a ) + ∇ (N ai a )
ζ
N
"
#
2
β4
+ 2 aij aij + ∇j ∇i (N aij )
ζ
N
"
#
β5
i
i
+ 2 − R(ai a ) − 2∇i (Ra )
ζ
"
#
β6
ij
ij
ij
+ 2 − ai aj R − ∇i (aj R ) − ∇j (ai R )
ζ
"
#
β7
1
+ 2 Raii + ∇2 (N R)
ζ
N
"
#
2 i
β8
i 2
(109)
+ 4 (∆a ) − ∇ [∆(N ∆ai )] ,
ζ
N
2
Fϕ = −G ij ∇i ϕ∇j ϕ, − Ĝ ijkl ∇l (N Kij ∇k ϕ),
N
"
#
4 ijkl
− Ĝ ∇l (∇k ϕ∇i ∇j ϕ)
3
"
5
+
− Ĝ ijkl [(ai ∇j ϕ)(ak ∇l ϕ) + ∇i (ak ∇j ϕ∇l ϕ)
3
#
+∇k (ai ∇j ϕ∇l ϕ)]
"
#
1
2 ijkl
+ Ĝ [aik ∇j ϕ∇l ϕ + ∇i ∇k (N ∇j ϕ∇l ϕ)] ,
3
N
(110)
(
Fλ = (1 − λ) (∇2 ϕ + ai ∇i ϕ)2 −
−
2
∇i (N K∇i ϕ)
N
)
2
∇i [N (∇2 ϕ + ai ∇i ϕ)∇i ϕ] .
N
(111)
(Fn )ij , (Fsa )ij and Fqϕ
are given, respectively, by
ij
, defined in equation (24),
1
(F0 )ij = − gij ,
2
1
1
(F1 )ij = Rij − Rgij + (gij ∇2 N − ∇j ∇i N ),
2
N
1
(F2 )ij = − gij R2 + 2RRij
2
2 gij ∇2 (N R) − ∇j ∇i (N R) ,
+
N
1
(F3 )ij = − gij Rmn Rmn + 2Rik Rjk
2
1h
k
− 2∇k ∇(i (N Rj)
)
+
N
i
+∇2 (N Rij ) + gij ∇m ∇n (N Rmn ) ,
1
(F4 )ij = − gij R3 + 3R2 Rij
2
3
gij ∇2 − ∇j ∇i (N R2 ),
+
N
1
(F5 )ij = − gij RRmn Rmn
2
+Rij Rmn Rmn + 2RRik Rjk
1h
+
gij ∇2 (N Rmn Rmn )
N
−∇j ∇i (N Rmn Rmn )
+∇2 (N RRij ) + gij ∇m ∇n (N RRmn )
i
m
N R) ,
−2∇m ∇(i (Rj)
1
l
+ 3Rmn Rmi Rnj
(F6 )ij = − gij Rnm Rln Rm
2
3 h
+
gij ∇m ∇n (N Ram Rna )
2N
i
+∇2 (N Rmi Rjm ) − 2∇m ∇(i (N Rj)n Rmn ) ,
1
(F7 )ij = − gij R∇2 R + Rij ∇2 R + R∇i ∇j R
2
1h
gij ∇2 (N ∇2 R) − ∇j ∇i (N ∇2 R)
+
N
+Rij ∇2 (N R) + gij ∇4 (N R) − ∇j ∇i (∇2 (N R))
i
1
−∇(j (N R∇i) R) + gij ∇k (N R∇k R) ,
2
1
2
(F8 )ij = − gij (∇m Rnl ) + 2∇m Rin ∇m Rnj
2
1h
n
)
2∇n ∇(i ∇m (N ∇m Rj)
+∇i Rmn ∇j Rmn +
N
−∇2 ∇m (N ∇m Rij ) − gij ∇n ∇p ∇m (N ∇m Rnp )
(F9 )ij
l
−2∇m (N Rl(i ∇m Rj)
) − 2∇n (N Rl(i ∇j) Rnl )
i
l
) ,
+2∇k (N Rlk ∇(i Rj)
h
i
1
1
= − gij ak Gk + ak Rk(j ∇i) R + a(i Rj)k ∇k R
2
2
−ak Rmi ∇j Rmk − ak Rn(i ∇n Rj)k
10
i
1h
ai Rkm ∇m Rkj + aj Rkm ∇m Rki
2
(
3
3
R∇k (N ak )Rij
− a(i R∇j) R +
8
8
−
h
i
h
i
+gij ∇ R∇k (N ak ) − ∇i ∇j R∇k (N ak )
2
1
+
4N
(
(F8a )ij
)
h
i
1
− ∇m ∇(i N aj) ∇m R + ∇(i (∇j) R)N am
2
+∇2 (N a(i ∇j) R) + gij ∇m ∇n (N am ∇n R)
h
i
k
k
+∇m ∇(i (∇j) Rm
)N ak + ∇(i (∇m Rj)
)N ak
k
k
)
) − 2gij ∇m ∇n (N ak ∇(n Rm)
−2∇2 (N ak ∇(i Rj)
h
p
p
+ N am Rj )
−∇m ∇i ∇p (N aj Rm
i
p
+∇j ∇p (N ai Rm
+ N am Rip )
p
+2∇2 ∇p (N a(i Rj)
)
)
(112)
(F0a )ij =
(F1a )ij =
(F2a )ij =
(F3a )ij =
(F4a )ij =
(F5a )ij =
(F6a )ij =
−gij ∇m ∇n (N am an ) ,
1
(F7a )ij = − gij Rakk + akk Rij + Raij
2
1h
gij ∇2 (N akk ) − ∇i ∇j (N akk )
+
N
1
(F1ϕ )ij = − gij ϕG mn Kmn
2
√
1
ν
Rj)ν
∂t ( gϕGij ) − 2ϕK(i
+ √
2 gN
1
+ ϕ(KRij + Kij R)
2 1
Gij ∇k (ϕNk ) − 2Gk(i ∇k (Nj) ϕ)
+
2N
+gij ∇2 (N ϕK) − ∇i ∇j (N ϕK)
+2gij ∇m ∇n ∇p (N a(n Rm)p ) ,
1
− gij ak ak + ai aj ,
2
1
− gij (ak ak )2 + 2(ak ak )ai aj ,
2
1
− gij (akk )2 + 2akk aij
2
i
1h
2∇(i (N aj) akk ) − gij ∇α (aα N akk ) ,
−
N
1
− gij (ak ak )aββ + akk ai aj + ak ak aij
2
i
1h
1
−
∇(i (N aj) ak ak ) − gij ∇α (aα N ak ak ) ,
N
2
1
− gij amn amn + 2aki akj
2
i
1h k
∇ (2N a(i aj)k − N aij ak ) ,
−
N
1
− gij (ak ak )R + ai aj R + ak ak Rij
2
i
1h
gij ∇2 (N ak ak ) − ∇i ∇j (N ak ak ) ,
+
N
1
− gij am an Rmn + 2am Rm(i aj)
2
1 h k
2∇ ∇(i (aj) N ak ) − ∇2 (N ai aj )
−
2N
i
i
1
−∇(i (N Raj) ) + gij ∇k (N Rak ) ,
2
1
2
= − gij (∆ak ) + (∆ai )(∆aj ) + 2∆ak ∇(i ∇j) ak
2
1h
∇k [a(i ∇k (N ∆aj) ) + a(i ∇j) (N ∆ak )
+
N
−ak ∇(i (N ∆aj) ) + gij N aβk ∆aβ − N aij ∆ak ]
i
−2∇(i (N aj)k ∆ak ) ,
(113)
+2∇k ∇(i (Kj)k ϕN ),
−∇2 (N ϕKij ) − gij ∇α ∇β (N ϕKαβ ) ,
1
(F2ϕ )ij = − gij ϕG mn ∇m ∇n ϕ
2
1
−2ϕ∇(i ∇k Rj)k + ϕR∇i ∇j ϕ
2
1
1
−
− (Rij + gij ∇2 − ∇i ∇j )(N ϕ∇2 ϕ)
N
2
1
−∇k ∇(i (N ϕ∇k ∇j) ϕ) + ∇2 (N ϕ∇i ∇j ϕ)
2
gij
+ ∇α ∇β (N ϕ∇α ∇β ϕ)
2
1
k
k
−Gk(i ∇ (N ϕ∇j) ϕ) + Gij ∇ (N ϕ∇k ϕ) ,
2
1
(F3ϕ )ij = − gij ϕG mn am ∇n ϕ
2
−ϕ(a(i Rj)k ∇k ϕ + ak Rk(i ∇j) ϕ)
1
+ Rϕa(i ∇j) ϕ
2 1
1
−
− (Rij + gij ∇2 − ∇i ∇j )(N ϕak ∇k ϕ)
N
2
i
1 h
− ∇k ∇(i (∇j) ϕN ϕ) + ∇(i (aj) ϕN ∇k ϕ)
2
1
+ ∇2 (N ϕa(i ∇j) ϕ)
2
gij α β
+ ∇ ∇ (N ϕaα ∇β ϕ) ,
2
1
(F4ϕ )ij = − gij Ĝ mnkl Kmn a(k ∇l) ϕ
2
1
√
+ √
∂t [ gGijkl a(l ∇k) ϕ]
2 gN
11
+
1 αh
∇ aα N(i ∇j) ϕ + N(i aj) ∇α ϕ
2N
i
−Nα a(i ∇j) ϕ + 2gij Nα ak ∇k ϕ
1
∇(i (N Nj) ak ∇k ϕ)
N
+ak Kk(i ∇j) ϕ + a(i Kj)k ∇k ϕ
+
(F5ϕ )ij
(F8ϕ )ij
−Ka(i ∇j) ϕ − Kij ak ∇k ϕ,
1
= − gij Ĝ mnkl [a(k ∇l) ϕ][∇m ∇n ϕ]
2
−a(i ∇k ∇j) ϕ∇k ϕ − ak ∇k ∇(i ϕ∇j) ϕ
+a(i ∇j) ϕ∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ∇i ∇j ϕ
1
+
∇k (N ϕak ∇i ϕ∇j ϕ)
2N
−2∇(i (N ∇j) ϕak ∇k ϕ)
+gij ∇α (∇α ϕak ∇k ϕ) ,
1
(F6ϕ )ij = − gij Ĝ mnkl [a(m ∇n) ϕ][a(k ∇l) ϕ]
2
1
− (ak ∇i ϕ − ai ∇k ϕ)(ak ∇j ϕ − aj ∇k ϕ),
2
1
ϕ
(F7 )ij = − gij Ĝ mnkl [∇(n ϕ][am)(k ][∇l) ϕ]
2
1 k
1
− ak ∇i ϕ∇j ϕ − aij ∇k ϕ∇k ϕ
2
2 1
k
+a(i ∇j) ϕ∇k ϕ −
− ∇(i (N aj) ∇k ϕ∇k ϕ)
2N
[1] P. Hořava, JHEP, 0903, 020 (2009) arXiv:grqc/0812.4287; Phys. Rev. D79, 084008 (2009) arXiv:grqc/0901.3775; Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 161301 (2009)
arXiv:gr-qc/0902.3657.
[2] E.M. Lifshitz, Zh. Eksp. Toer. Fiz., 11, 255 (1941).
[3] M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D80, 025011 (2009) arXiv:grqc/0902.0590; arXiv:gr-qc/0912.4757; C. Germani, A.
Kehagias and K. Sfetsos, arXiv:gr-qc/0906.1201.
[4] D. Blas, O. Pujolas and S. Sibiryakov, Phys. Rev. Lett.
104, 181302 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0909.3525; JHEP, 1104,
018 (2011) arXiv:1007.3503.
[5] I. Kimpton and A. Padilla, J. High Energy Phys. 07, 014
(2010) arXiv:gr-qc/1003.5666.
[6] H. Lü, J. Mei and C.N. Pope, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103,
091301 (2009) arXiv:gr-qc/0904.1595.
[7] G. Calcagni, J. High Energy Phys., 09, 112 (2009)
arXiv:gr-qc/0904.0829.
[8] R. G. Cai, L. M. Cao and N. Ohta, Phys. Rev. D80,
024003 (2009) arXiv:gr-qc/0904.3670; A. Kehagias and
K. Sfetsos, Phys. Lett. B678, 123 (2009) arXiv:grqc/0905.0477; M.-i. Park, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 123
(2009) arXiv:gr-qc/0905.4480; A. Ghodsi and E. Hatefi,
Phys. Rev. D81, 044016 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0906.1237;
K. Izumi and S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D81, 044008
(2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0911.1814; E. Kiritsis, Phys. Rev.
D81, 044009 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0911.3164; G. Koutsoumbas, E. Papantonopoulos, P. Pasipoularides and
+∇k (N a(i ∇j) ϕ∇k ϕ)
gij
+ ∇k (N ak ∇m ϕ∇m ϕ)
2
1 k
− ∇ (N ak ∇i ϕ∇j ϕ) ,
2
1
= − gij (∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)2
2
−2(∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)(∇i ∇j ϕ + ai ∇j ϕ)
1
− 2∇(j [N ∇i) ϕ(∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)]
−
N
α
2
k
+gij ∇ [N (∇ ϕ + ak ∇ ϕ)∇α ϕ] ,
1
(F9ϕ )ij = − gij (∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)K
2
−(∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)Kij
−(∇i ∇j ϕ + ai ∇j ϕ)K
√
1
∂t [ g(∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)gij ]
+ √
2 gN
1
−
− ∇(j [Ni) (∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)]
N
1
+ gij ∇α [Nα (∇2 ϕ + ak ∇k ϕ)]
2
1
k
−∇(j (N K∇i) ϕ) + gij ∇k (N K∇ ϕ) .
2
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
(114)
M.Tsoukalas, Phys. Rev. D81, 124014 (2010) arXiv:grqc/1004.2289.
P. Hořava, Class. Quantum Grav. 28, 114012 (2011)
arXiv:gr-qc/1101.1081.
A. Borzou, K. Lin and A. Wang, JCAP, 05, 006 (2011)
arXiv:gr-qc/1103.4366.
T. Sotiriou, M. Visser and S. Weinfurtner, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 102, 251601 (2009) arXiv:gr-qc/0904.4464; J. High
Energy Phys., 10, 033 (2009) arXiv:gr-qc/0905.2798.
E. Kiritsis and G. Kofinas, Nucl. Phys. B821, 467 (2009)
arXiv:gr-qc/0904.1334.
A. Wang and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024009
(2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0907.1748.
A. Padilla, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 259, 012033 (2010)
arXiv:gr-qc/1009.4074; T.P. Sotiriou, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
283, 012034 (2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1010.3218; T. Clifton,
P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, arXiv:grqc/1106.2476.
S. Mukohyama, Class. Quantum Grav. 27, 223101 (2010)
arXiv:gr-qc/1007.5199.
bibitemBS C. Bogdanos and E. N. Saridakis, Class.
Quant. Grav. 27, 75005 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0907.1636.
Y.-Q. Huang, A. Wang and Q. Wu, Mod. Phys. Lett. 25,
2267 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/1003.2003.
A. Wang and Q. Wu, Phys. Rev. D83, 044025 (2011)
arXiv:gr-qc/1009.0268.
C. Charmousis, G. Niz, A. Padilla and P.M. Saffin, JHEP,
12
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
08, 070 (2009) arXiv:gr-qc/0905.2579; D. Blas, O. Pujolas and S. Sibiryakov, JHEP 10, 029 (2009) arXiv:grqc/0906.3046; K. Koyama and F. Arroja, JHEP 03,
061 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0910.1998; A. Papazoglou and
T.P. Sotiriou, Phys. Lett. B685, 197 (2010) arXiv:grqc/0911.1299.
A.I. Vainshtein, Phys. Lett. B 39, 393 (1972); V.A.
Rubakov and P.G. Tinyakov, Phys. -Uspekhi, 51, 759
(2008); K. Hinterbichler (2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1105.3735.
K. Izumi and S. Mukohyama (2011) arXiv:grqc/1105.0246.
A.E. Gumrukcuoglu, S. Mukohyama and A. Wang (2011)
arXiv:gr-qc/1109.2609.
T. Zhu, Q. Wu, A. Wang and F.-W. Shu, Phys. Rev.
D84, 101502 (R) (2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1108.1237.
T. Zhu, F.-W. Shu, Q. Wu and A. Wang, Phys. Rev.
D85, 044053 (2012) arXiv:gr-qc/ 1110.5106.
P. Hořava and C.M. Melby-Thompson, Phys. Rev. D82,
064027 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/1007.2410.
A. Wang and Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. D83, 044031 (2011)
arXiv:gr-qc/1009.2089.
Y.-Q. Huang and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D83, 104012
(2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1011.0739.
A.M. da Silva, Class. Quantum Grav. 28, 055011 (2011)
arXiv:gr-qc/1009.4885.
J. Kluson, Phys. Rev. D83, 044049 (2011) arXiv:grqc/1011.1857.
K. Lin, A. Wang, Q. Wu and T. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D84,
044051 (2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1106.1486.
K. Lin and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D87, 084041 (2013).
I. Bengtsson and J.M.M. Senovilla, Phys. rev. D79,
024027 (2009).
[32] Y.-Q. Huang, A. Wang, and Q. Wu (2012) arXiv:grqc/1201.4630.
[33] J. J. Greenwald, V.H. Satheeshkumar, and A. Wang,
JCAP, 12 , 007 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/1010.3794; J. Greenwald, J. Lenells, J. X. Lu, V. H. Satheeshkumar, and
A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D84, 084040 (2011) arXiv:grqc/1105.4259; A. Borzou, K. Lin, and A. Wang, JCAP,
02, 025 (2012) arXiv:gr-qc/1110.1636.
[34] J. Alexandre and P. Pasipoularides, Phys. Rev. D 83,
084030 (2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1010.3634; ibid., D84, 084020
(2011) arXiv:gr-qc/1108.1348.
[35] K. Lin, S. Mukohyama, and A. Wang (2012) arXiv:grqc/1206.1338.
[36] C. Bogdanos, and E. N. Saridakis, Class. Quant. Grav.
27, 075005 (2010) arXiv:gr-qc/0907.1636.
[37] K. Lin and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D87, 084041 (2013).
[38] K. Lin, S. Mukohyama and A. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 86,
104024 (2012).
[39] C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation (W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco,
1973), p. 484-528.
[40] Gonçalves, S.M.C.V. Shear-free gravitational collapse is
strongly censored. Phys. Rev. D 69, 021502 (2004).
[41] K. Lin, S. Mukohyama, A. Wang and T. Zhu, Phys. Rev.
D 89, 084022 (2014).
[42] O. Goldoni, M.F.A. da Silva, G. Pinheiro and R. Chan,
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 23, 1450068 (2014).
[43] O. Goldoni, M.F.A. da Silva, G. Pinheiro and R. Chan,
Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 24, 1550021 (2015).