Bild 1 - Karvi.fi

advertisement

Student-centered teaching and the quality of learning

Maria Weurlander

PhD, Researcher and Educational Developer

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Stockholm

Educating for an unkown tomorrow

Deep and integrated knowledge

Logical and analytical skills

Communication skills

Problem-solving skills

Ability to be creative and innovative

Ability to learn and develop

Ability to work in teams

Higher Education Ordinance

For a Degree of Bachelor the student shall

• demonstrate the ability to search for, gather, evaluate and critically interpret the relevant information for a formulated problem and also discuss phenomena, issues and situations critically

• demonstrate the ability to identify, formulate and solve problems autonomously and to complete tasks within predetermined time frames

3

”I think this course has been good. But in many other courses, the teachers were just giving out a lot of information and I didn’t understand a thing. Then you had to put the pieces together on your own as best you can. The teachers had just thrown out a lot of jigsaw pieces.”

Medical student, year 2

“The group assessment was fun and challenging, and gave the much longed-for overall picture that is so difficult to put together on your own.

Most of what we study is divided into small pieces and since the time is limited, and you don’t have time to learn everything, we often miss out on the bigger picture.”

Medical student, year 2

” I am positive towards the peer instruction. I learn a lot by first thinking through the problems by myself and then by discussing them with others. Using clickers is also good. The lectures become more fun and I also think it is good for the teachers to see how many students who really understand.

To think for myself shows what I understand. To discuss or explain to others is the best. You understand so much more by doing that.”

Engineering student, year 1

(Weurlander et al, in preparation)

Learning a new subject

Many new specific concepts

Difficult to see the overall picture

Difficult to discern what is relevant

Many students struggle to understand

(Weurlander, 2012; Weurlander et al, 2014)

Designing courses for meaningful learning

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Intended learning

Outcomes

Degree level

Meaningful learning

Context: Relating to real-life or future profession

Motivation: Challenging and stimulating

Connections: Making connections, building knowledgestructures

Wholeness: Sense of wholeness

Cooperation: learning together, through discussions

(Ausubel, 1978; Entwistle, 2009; Weurlander, 2012)

• Student-centered

• Activating/ engaging

• Facilitates meaningful learning

• Help students understand and apply

• Higher order skills

• Authentic

• Requires application of knowledge

• Assess higher order skills

• Various forms

• Formative and summative

(Fink, 2003)

Changing the assessment practice

Deep and integrated knowledge

Logical and analytical skills

Communication skills

Problem-solving skills

Ability to be creative and innovative

Ability to learn and develop

Ability to work in teams

Implementing student-centered teaching

Competent teachers

Allocated resources

Assessment for learning culture

Managerial support

12

Maria Weurlander

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Stockholm, Sweden mariaweu@kth.se

Download