Nonlinear Dynamics of Fluid Motion “Nonlinear Dynamics” has deepened our understanding of fluid dynamics, and taught us many lessons about nonlinear phenomena. No movies in this version; some may be found at www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/Gollub/lab.html Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Thanks to Collaborators Postdocs and graduate students: G. Voth, JC Tsai, W. Losert, A. Kudrolli, D. Vallette, B. Gluckman, J. Liu, O. Mesquita, T. Solomon, F. Simonelli, A. Dougherty, M. Heutmaker, M. Lowe, S. Ciliberto. Undergraduate collaborators: E. Henry, B. Pier, Antony Bak, David G.W. Cooper, David Rothstein, David Schalk, Mark Buckley, and Ben Bigger and many previous students. NSF - DMR-0072203 (Haverford) and DMR-0072203 (Penn) Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Central Ideas from Nonlinear Dynamics Using phase space to describe fluid systems: mode amplitudes and their evolution. Geometrical thinking: attracting and repelling fixed points; multiple attractors; limit cycle attractors; chaotic attractors representing nonperiodic flows. Understanding instabilities as bifurcations or qualitative changes in the phase space of a system, e.g. birth or death of fixed points. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Central ideas - II Common features shared by disparate systems: Supercritical vs. subcritical transitions Bifurcation scenarios The central role of symmetry Patterns and spatiotemporal chaos described by generic amplitude equations in large systems Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 A Few Examples The role of stretching in fluid mixing Clustering of particles suspended in a liquid. Nonlinear waves on fluid interfaces Multiple stability in granular flow Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 1. Stretching and Fluid Mixing Measuring fluid stretching can illuminate mixing and illustrate nonlinear dynamics. Greg Voth, George Haller, Greg Dobler, Tim Saint. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Types of Fluid Mixing Turbulent mixing: Random structures produced by fluid instability at high Reynolds number Re stretch and fold fluid elements. Chaotic mixing: Some laminar flows at modest Re can produce complex distributions of material. Fundamental process: Non-reversible stretching and folding of fluid elements, with diffusion at small scales. Chaos in real space. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Background on Stretching in Chaotic Mixing Chaotic mixing has been well studied, and the importance of stretching was emphasized and investigated by J. Ottino and colleagues Khakhar, Swanson, and Muzzio. Others (Rom-Kedar, Leonard, Wiggins) have illuminated the connection between nonlinear dynamics and mixing theoretically. What is new in our work is the experimental measurement of space and time resolved stretching fields. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Apparatus: 2D Magnetically Driven Fluid Layer Glycerol and water a few mm thick, containing fluorescent dye. Electrodes Magnet Array Top View: Periodic forcing: I(t) = I 0 sin(2πft) Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Precise Particle Tracking z ~ 800 fluorescent particles tracked simultaneously. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Velocity Fields 0.9 cm/sec 0 (p=5, Re=56) Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Why Do Periodic Flows Mix? Breaking Time Reversal Symmetry To mix, the flow can be time periodic, but must not be time reversible: V (t ) ≠ − V (−t ) relative to any starting time. Finite Reynolds number Re=VL/ν can break time Velocity at equal intervals reversal symmetry: before and after the moment of minimum velocity. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 10 Vx Vy 8 2 < ((v(t) + v(-t)) > 1/2 (mm/s) Breaking of Time Reversal Symmetry 6 4 2 0 0 50 100 150 200 Reynolds Number Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Structures in the Poincaré Map of the Flow Displacements in one period, color coded. Hyperbolic Fixed Points A small part (6%) of the flow. Elliptic Fixed Points 0 cm 1.7 cm Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Manifolds of Hyperbolic Fixed Points Unstable Manifold Stable Manifold Typical of Hamiltonian Chaos Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Definition of Stretching L Stretching = lim (L/L0) L0 0 Past Stretching Field: Stretching that a fluid element has experienced during the last ∆t. (Large near unstable man.) L0 Future Stretching Field: Stretching that a fluid element will experience in the next ∆t. (Large near stable man.) Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Past Stretching Field Stretching is organized in sharp lines. Re=45, p=1, ∆t=3 Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Future and Past Stretching Fields Future Stretching Field (Blue) marks the stable manifold. Past Stretching Field (Red) marks the unstable manifold. Circles mark hyperbolic points. A “heteroclinic tangle”. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Understanding the Dye Concentration Field Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Unstable manifold (past stretching field) and the dye concentration field Lines of large past stretching (unstable manifold) are aligned with the contours of the concentration field. This is true at every time (phase). Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Stretching is Inhomogeneous: PDF Probability Log(stretching) Stretching over one period (Finite Time Lyap. Exp.) λ/<λ> (Re=100,p=5) Solid: Re=45, p=1, <λ>=1.9 per-1 Dotted: Re=100, p=5, <λ>=6.4 per-1 Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Decay of the Dye Concentration Field Re=25 Re=55 Re=85 Re=100 Re=115 Re=145 Re=170 Log Contrast Log of Standard Deviation of Dye Intensity 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (periods) Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Can Mixing Rates Be Predicted? Antonsen et al. predict the long time decay of concentration variance based on the prob. dist. P(h,t) of finite time Lyapunov exponents (stretching) Using our measured P(h,t) and their theory, we predict mixing (variance decay) rates a factor of 10 larger than is observed. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Predicting Mixing Rates - (cont.) Why is mixing so slow? Large system Æ Transport over long distances is important. Enhanced or “eddy” diffusion: By watching particles diffuse, we can succesfully predict the rate of decay of a scalar field. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Future The onset of non-periodic flow (2D turbulence) does not dramatically change mixing rates, to our surprise. Are the main features of non-periodic mixing captured by the periodic case discussed here? What will be the topological properties of stretching fields for non-periodic flows? Papers: G.A. Voth et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002) and Phys. Fluids (2003) Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 2. Structure and Dynamics of Hydrodynamically Mediated Particle Clusters Fluid mediated interactions between particles lead to forces between them. zA variety of tunable patterns are produced, including chaotic states. zGreg Voth, Charles Thomas, Ben Bigger, Mark Buckley, Michael Brenner, Howard Stone, and JPG. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Observations of Clustering f=50 Hz Γ=4.5 Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Related Phenomena Sedimentation – when particles fall in a fluid, they influence each other. Fluidized beds, widely used for catalysis. Here: An example of physical self-assembly of ordered particulate structures Chaos in a system of interacting particles Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Rayleigh Streaming Streaming flow for a particle in a fluid - no boundary From Van Dyke, An Album of Fluid Motion Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Origin of Long Range Attraction Rayleigh: steady streaming flow away from poles and toward the equator generated outside the viscous boundary layer (0.2 mm) surrounding the particle. Predicted inflow velocity V (r ) = −0.53 Aa 2 ων / r 3 (via collaborators M. Brenner and H. Stone). Particles follow this flow as they approach each other. However, see Voth and Otto, KC004, Tuesday Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 08:39 Approach Curves for 2 Particles F=20 Hz; Γ=2.9; A=0.4 mm (periodic) time 0.0 s •Dashed: theory; Solid:experiments; -2 s t = 0 at F=50 Hz; Γ=4.6; endA=0.15 of approach. mm (chaotic) •At higher excitation amplitude, the particles do not touch. Æ Repulsive force also. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Trapezoidal Cluster - Chaotic Motion 1.0 Particle Three N=4, Γ=2.97. (a) trajectories; (b) spacings vs. time. Note transitions. y position (mm) 0.5 Particle Four 0.0 -0.5 Particle Two -1.0 Particle One -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 x position (mm) 1.8 pair separations (mm) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 Particles 2 & 1 Particles 3 & 1 Particles 4 & 2 Particles 4 & 3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 200 400 600 Fluid time (s) Dynamics Prize800 Lecture – Copyright1000 Jerry Gollub, 2003 1200 Fluctuating Five Particle Cluster 1.5 1.0 (a) Trajectories (Γ=2.96) (b) separations vs. time. Nonperiodic oscillations. Particle Five y position (mm) 0.5 Particle Four Particle Three 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -1.5 Particle Two -1.0 Particle One -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 x position (mm) 1.8 1.6 pair separation (mm) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 Particles 2 & 1 Particles 3 & 1 Particles 3 & 2 Particles 4 & 1 Particles 4 & 3 Particles 5 & 2 Particles 5 & 3 Particles 5 & 4 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 200 400 600 time (s) Fluid Dynamics800Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 1000 1200 Large Cluster Trajectories 6 6 Γ=5.53 4 4 2 2 y position (mm) y position (mm) Γ=3.44 0 0 -2 -2 -4 -4 -6 -6 -6 -4 -2 0 x position (mm) 2 4 6 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 x position (mm) Large cluster trajectories, for several accelerations. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Main Conclusions - Interacting Particles Many different structures, ordered, disordered, chaotic Observations suggest an effective interaction potential for two particles. But pairwise interactions do not suffice for many particles. Large and small clusters behave differently. More: Voth et al. PRL 88, 234301 (2002); C.C. Thomas & JPG, in preparation. Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Complex wave patterns Kudrolli, Pier, Edwards, JPG Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Quasicrystalline wave pattern Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Sheared Granular Flow Shearing induces order; order modifies Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 Conclusions Ideas from nonlinear dynamics contribute to understanding fluid phenomena. Equally, fluids illuminate nonlinear dynamics and can be used to teach it. Fluids ought to play a larger role in physics teaching. I make a case for this in Physics Today, December 2003: “One of the oddities of contemporary physics education is the nearly complete absence of continuum mechanics…” Movies: www.haverford.edu/physicsastro/Gollub/lab.html Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003 END Fluid Dynamics Prize Lecture – Copyright Jerry Gollub, 2003