2015 Dividing the Waters Conference Gonzaga University School of Law, Spokane, Washington October 14-17, 2015 Established Water Rights and Changing Conditions Pre-Conference Webinar (Lunchtime, September 25): Water Law 101 Wednesday, October 14 5:00 p.m. Welcome Reception (Gonzaga University School of Law) Rachael Paschal Osborn, Presentation on Spokane River/Coeur D’Alene Basin Thursday, October 15 Emerging Water Conflicts in Changing Conditions Washington: Water Agency Decisions in a Time of Drought, Growth, and Changing Needs The Water Conflicts Headed to the Courts Administrative and Judicial Appeals from Agency Decision-Making Challenges on Judicial Review: complex science, intersecting state and federal laws The California Dilemma: Grafting Groundwater & Surface Water Rights California’s New Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and Recent Legal Developments State and Local Agencies Managing Groundwater Courts as the Final Arbiter Science for Judges: Groundwater Hydrology and Fishery Biology Experience the Challenge of Hearing – and Deciding – on Expert Science Testimony o Experienced Water Judges Will Examine Two Experts, on Hydrology & Biology o Participants Will Deliberate and Decide How to Use Science in a Mock Decision The Experts: Dr. Thomas Harter (UC Davis) and Dr. Jack Stanford (U. of Montana) Friday, October 16 Field Day in the Spokane River and Coeur D’Alene Basin Visit Key Sites Where Water Conflicts Arise and Talk to Local Water Managers City of Spokane Groundwater Extraction Facilities Groundwater-River-Power Connections Roundtable Discussion of Coeur D’Alene Basin Water Conference Dinner – Keynote Speaker: Stanford Law Professor Barton “Buzz” Thompson “Changing Course: Ensuring that Water Law is Resilient in the Face of Radical Change” Saturday, October 17 Interstate and International Water Conflict Resolution Interstate Water Conflict Resolution Comparing Supreme Court Litigation, Interstate Compacts, and Interstate Agreements International Water Conflict Resolution –1964 Columbia River Treaty, 50 Years Later Successes/Shortcomings, Updating the Treaty, Emerging Issues, Differing Perspectives Conclusion: Framing the Questions and Answers to Take Back to Your Colleagues