Annual Report
2011 - 12
Delhi Urban Art Commission
India Habitat Centre,Core-6A
Lodhi Road
New Delhi - 110 003
Annual Report 2011-12
28
DELHI URBAN ART COMMISSION
Upto 2.6.2011
Chairman
Prof. K.T. Ravindran
Members
Prof. M. Shaheer
Prof. Nayanjot Lahiri
Shri Ratish Nanda
Dr. M.M. Kutty, JS(DL)
From 3.6.2011
Chairman
Shri Raj Rewal
Members
Smt. Sonali Bhagwati
Shri Eric P. Mall
Shri Satish Khanna
Additional Secretary (UD)
Officers
Shri Navneet Kumar
Shri Vinod Kumar
Shri Amit Mukherji
Annual Report 2011-12
Secretary
Assistant Secretary (Tech.)
Administrative Officer
29
The Delhi Urban Art Commission is an autonomous body
set up by an Act of Parliament in 1973 to advise the
Government of India in the matter of preserving, developing
and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and
environmental design within Delhi,
and to provide advice and guidance to any local body
in respect of any project of building operations or
engineering operations or any development proposal
which affects or is likely to affect the skyline or the
aesthetic quality of the surroundings or any public
amenity provided therein.
Annual Report 2011-12
30
Contents
Page Nos.
1.
Cityscape
31-33
2.
City Level Projects
34-36
3.
Guidelines for individual proposals
37-39
4.
Significant Projects
40-42
5.
Administration and Organization
43-45
6.
Annexure-I
46-47
7.
Annexure-II
48-56
8.
Annexure-III
57-64
Acknowledgement
65
Annual Report 2011-12
31
Cityscape
Delhi, a multi-layered City has been witnessing unprecedented growth over the past
decade on account of the metro network, the recent Commonwealth Games and being
the capital city of an economically progressive country. The City has over a period of
time developed quality infrastructure at the same time respecting its heritage and
continues to remain one of the most attractive cities of the World. With no other city in
the Country being of comparable standards and being an economic hub of the country
the city has high level of population influx which has resulted in mushrooming of slums
and unauthorized colonies, mounting pressure on its overburdened civic system,.
Needless to say that the growth of the city needs to be channelized in a careful manner
to avoid uncontrolled and haphazard development.
The current economic slow down provides an opportunity to consolidate our
gains and learn from our mistakes. As such, the Commission has been sceptical of those
proposals which were out of sync with the overall urban form and were defeating the
very objective for which they had been proposed. For instance, despite large number of
fly-over proposals in the City, the traffic scenario continues to be far from satisfactory.
Consequently, the Commission has been emphasizing that mega projects should not be
considered in isolation but in the context of an overall perspective.
The Delhi Urban Art Commission was set up by an Act of Parliament with a view
to advise the Central Govt. in the matter of preserving, developing and maintaining the
aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design within Delhi and to provide advice
and guidance to any local body in respect of any project of building operation or
engineering operations or any development proposals which affects or is likely to affect
the sky-line or the aesthetic quality of surroundings or any public amenity provided
therein. The Act came into force with effect from May 1, 1974.
One of the important functions of the Delhi Urban Art Commission in terms of its
mandate is ‘to promote and secure the development/redevelopment or beautification
of any area in Delhi in respect of which no proposal in that behalf has been received
from any local body’. The Commission was reconstituted in June 2011. One of the very
first steps by the Commission on assuming office was to hold series of meetings with its
advisors, architect community, heads of Public Sector Undertakings and a cross-section
Annual Report 2011-12
32
of other experts to chalk out its agenda for the future. Based on the deliberation at
these meetings the Commission sent a proposal to the Government for taking up key
city level issues on which the Commission felt that it can make valuable contribution.
Further details in this regard are contained in a separate chapter.
With a view to streamline the system internally the Commission made an indepth introspection of the existing system and after detailed review it formulated a set
of criteria which play a significant role related to aesthetics of a public building. The
Commission decided to obtain an undertaking from the owner and architect of the
public buildings while referring proposals to the Commission that they would meet these
criteria. Once such an undertaking is received, it requires minimal examination on the
part of the Commission and would thereby expedite approvals of such buildings. The
Commission has incorporated these criteria in its proforma required to accompany
project proposals. The concerned local authorities have also been informed about the
revised procedure. The streamlining of the procedure helped in significant reduction in
the consideration time in respect of proposals referred to the Commission.
Another area where the Commission felt that needs to be given due attention is
acknowledging the contribution of architect, engineer and owner of existing and
proposed public buildings. The Commission felt that all existing public buildings need to
be maintained properly with due respect and intent of the original architect who
designed it. Accordingly, the Commission decided to take up with all concerned that in
case any changes are desired on the external façade by the owner and the architect is
alive it should be done with his consent and approval. In case the architect is not alive,
the changes need to be done in a sensitive manner with respect to the original design.
To acknowledge the contribution of professionals engaged in public buildings, it
was also decided that a plaque indicating the name of the architect, engineer, builder
etc at a suitable location in all existing and proposed projects should be installed. On the
basis of its decision, the Commission has written to authorities of all important public
buildings in Delhi for compliance on the above aspects.
In terms of the present guidelines of the Central Vigilance Commission and the
Government of India selection of architects is being done on the basis of bids. The
existing procedure has the possibility of overlooking the talent of the architect and
Annual Report 2011-12
33
giving predominance to financial criteria. With a view to secure the best talent for a
project the Commission has suggested to Ministry of Urban Development that existing
procedure should be modified to provide for architectural competitions in respect of
public buildings. The Jury of the competition needs to be announced in advance and the
Jury should comprise of eminent architects. The architect’s selection on the panel should
be based on merit of their professional expertise and not on the basis of annual turnover
of their professional income. The fee and the stages of payment to the architect selected
on the basis of the competition need to be done in terms of the guidelines laid down by
the Council of Architecture. The recommendations of the Commission have also been
endorsed by the Council of Architecture.
The Commission continued to update its website to reflect the changes taken
place during the year and put maximum information in the public domain in terms of the
provisions of the Right to Information Act. Its web based technical programme which
can be accessed by different stakeholders provides information about status of
proposals from the time of submission till its final disposal.
The Commission made substantial progress during the last few years in
implementation of the provisions of the Official Language Policy of the Government. An
inspection by the High level Parliamentary Committee on Official Languages was
conducted successfully during the year.
Annual Report 2011-12
34
City Level Projects
Despite three Master Plans and the presence of a number of local agencies in Delhi, the
quality of life in the City is far from satisfactory for most citizens. The Commission feels it
is important that planning process need to give due importance to ground realities and
plans need to be reviewed periodically taking into cognizance changing dynamics of the
City. With this intent, the Commission held a series of deliberations with the local
bodies, architect’s community, urban designers, urban planners and other experts.
After, in-depth deliberations and on the basis of support received from different cross
sections of experts with whom the Commission interacted, the Commission proposes to
initiate suo-moto action on the following proposals
1.
Site specific design for wards
After completion of the exercise for preparation of Master Plan-2021 by the DDA
as next step Zonal plan have also been prepared and notified by the DDA in
respect of the each zone in Delhi except for Zone-D. The exercise for finalization
of Zone-D plan is also in progress. The next step would involve preparation of
local area plans or wards plans in respect of each zone. The DUAC is a forum
which has expertise for conducting three dimensional studies in respect of these
areas. The Commission accordingly proposed to the Govt. for developing ward
plans in consultation with the RWA, concerned MLA etc. which shall have site
specific design for each ward.
2.
Rehabilitation of Unauthorised colonies/Slums in Delhi
With the fast economic growth of the country, Delhi has become a hub for trade
and commercial activities. This has increased the scope for employment
opportunities in the City, leading to large influx of population from different
parts of the country. Due to absence of low cost housing large section of the
population reside in slums. The number of slums in the city is 2000 plus. The
unplanned growth of the slums makes life very difficult for the inhabitants. To
name a few problems :
-
Lack of civic amenities like Water, electricity, drainage etc.
-
Lack of public toilets.
Annual Report 2011-12
35
-
Lack of medical facilities.
-
Absence of garbage disposal system
-
Absence of proper roads.
-
Water logging in monsoon.
These slums cannot be washed away. There is an urgent need for improving
quality of life for the inhabitants of these slums. DUAC propose to take up a
study for rehabilitation of ten slums and ten unauthorised colonies.
3.
Vision for Delhi
Delhi is a dynamic city which has both heritage value and modern architectural
and engineering structures. The City also has substantial unauthorised
development. The influx of population in Delhi is very high. These are some of
the factors which necessitate a review of vision for Delhi so that the future
development is not at cost of its heritage.
4.
High Rise developments proposals along metro corridors.
The development of metro in Delhi has had an unprecedented impact on the
Cityscape. It is natural that property development along metro corridors
intensifies in due course of time. To ensure that such development takes place in
planned manner and not in a haphazard manner the DUAC propose preparation
of development plans for high rise development along existing metro corridors in
Delhi
5.
Rejuvenation of Delhi Gardens
Delhi has large number of gardens, however, except few like Lodhi Garden the
landscape elements and amenities at these gardens are less than expected.
There is, therefore, a need to make these gardens live places for different cross
section of the society. The possibility of providing garden restaurants, museums,
amphitheatre, public amenities etc. could be envisaged. While provisions exist in
MPD-2021 on providing such amenities each garden's requirements/needs to be
reviewed on a case-to-case basis. The Commission proposes to take up study of
ten gardens under the DDA and ten gardens under the CPWD .
Annual Report 2011-12
36
6.
Preparation of design and prototype for high-tech public toilets
The Commission has observed the deplorable condition of public toilets in Delhi.
It is estimated that there are above 25 lakh women in Delhi who go for their
necessary functions before dawn every morning in the open fields. The
Commission considers this an unfortunate state of affairs. It is estimated that
about 5 lakh toilets need to be provided near basti's and slum areas and also
along areas where there are large number of persons who require such facilities.
However, to start with 200 public toilets could be put up in different areas. Our
aim is self cleaning high-tech toilet which requires minimum maintenance and
which would be industrially prefabricated. The design manufacture would be
through an open competition in which architects, industrial designers can
compete to produce a proto-type design with the help of the industry which will
be inspected, approved and installed by the DUAC.
The competition would be held in two stages :-
Stage I :
Four approved designs with drawings & models
Stage II :
Four proto-type manufactured by the industrial unites based on approved
designs
7.
Unified Building bye-laws for Delhi
One of the primary assignments undertaken by the reconstituted Commission is
simplification of existing Building Bye-laws of Delhi with the intent to make them
user-friendly, clear cut and work towards a single window system. In this
direction, the Commission constituted a Committee of experts who are working
in consultation with the local authorities. Based on the check list requested from
concerned bodies in the next phase, it is proposed to develop a software which
would enable a project proponent to know the approvals from different agencies
that would be required for his project and the criteria that he would require to
fulfill for obtaining approval for his project.
Annual Report 2011-12
37
Guidelines for individual proposals
Master Plan for Delhi-2021 envisages major initiatives for proper development of
the city in consonance with the requisites of modern living and acceptable
environmental parameters. In the light of this, it envisages that this would lead to large
scale development/ redevelopment activity the role of DUAC therefore becomes all the
more relevant to evaluate things in an overall perspective and act as a watchdog to
ensure that the development/redevelopment of the capital city is taking place in a
proper manner.
The Commission has an advisory role to the Central Government and local bodies
in Delhi in terms of its mandate has taken proactive initiative in pursuing the national
mission on sustainable habitat.
The Commission during the course of introspection of its existing system felt that
there are certain common aspects pertaining to all proposals which ensures aesthetics
of a public buidling at minimal maintenance in the long run. As such, if such aspects are
taken care of in respect of public buidlings it would facilitate and expedite consideration
of a proposal.
With a view to reduce the consideration time on individual proposals received,
the Commission after detailed deliberation revised the proforma which is to accompany
proposals and which is signed by the owner and the architect of the proposed building.
The proforma now includes an undertaking to be given by the owner and architect on
the criteria mentioned hereunder.



The permanent finishing material like stone, bricks, glass, ceramic tiles, concrete
with silicon finish, metal panel, aggregate finish shall be provided in the external
facade elevation of the building and cleaning arrangement will be planned and
provided (this is required in case of a building of 4 storey or higher);
All coolers, air conditioners, pipes and ducts shall be hidden / concealed and not
surface mounted / hung on the façade;
Overhead water tanks, mumties and services on the roof shall be integrated as
part of architectural elements;
Annual Report 2011-12
38








Proper signage shall be provided which shall be prominently displayed near
entrance gate for easy access as an important feature of the complex;
Glass of quality to ensure that unwanted summer heat and glare does not disturb
interiors only will be used and the building will be energy efficient and glass on
west and south side will be high performance / have shading device;
Solid boundary wall shall not be more than 4 feet high from ground level and
beyond 4 feet it shall be transparent with steel grills or any other transparent
material; (not applicable for building where there is high security requirements
as per approval of the competent authority).
Wherever applicable green spaces for community use shall be well maintained.
Plaque will be put up in the building premises at a prominent location indicating
name of architect, engineer and builder;
In case of any changes proposed to the external façade consent of the original
architect who designed the building will be obtained and incase the architect is
not alive, the changes will be done in sensitive manner with respect to the
original design;
Minimum 1% of project cost will be spent on works of art in the building
complex. (this is required only for public buildings).
Once an undertaking is received from the project proponent that the aforesaid
aspects will be ensured the consideration time by the Commission gets
substantially reduced.
The Commission encourages promoters/architects to approach it directly for
conceptual approval. While the proposals are routed through the local body in terms of
the DUAC Act, conceptual approval helps in saving time and energy at latter stage.
An important area where the Commission continued to play an active role is
encouraging art in public places. The guidelines issued by the Government exists since
1972 for earmarking 2% of the project cost on art work. However, hardly any creative
work in the light of above guidelines have come to the fore. On account of
unsatisfactory quality of art work, the Commission organized a workshop few years back
on “Public Art and Commonwealth Games Projects”. On the basis of deliberations at the
workshops detailed guidelines relating to public art have been issued which could be
perused at Annexure-I.
An area where the Commission has always given special attention is ensuring
that the provisions for Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunity, Protection and Right
and Full Participation) Act, 1995 are implemented in both later and spirit. The
Annual Report 2011-12
39
Commission believes that design aspect plays a vital role in enabling accessibility to a
building by differently- abled persons.
Annual Report 2011-12
40
Significant Projects
Metro Phase-III
Metro is the most significant intervention on the cityscape impacting it both
aesthetically and functionally. The primary concern of the Commission while considering
metro proposals was coordination of the stations and related movements with the
surrounding city fabric. Metro has now initiated action on the Phase-III routes which
covers 123 kms. The DMRC made a presentation on metro phase-III proposals before the
Commission. The Commission while lauding the work done by the DMRC emphasized
the need for having the Metro underground in densely populated areas and areas where
aesthetics of the area was at stake . The proposal of Metro Phase-III was generally found
acceptable with the following recommendations:1.
The Commission strongly felt that in certain sensitive areas namely the
Nizamuddin area and New Moti Bagh area, the Metro should be underground
rather than elevated.
2.
The underground line should be preferably under the area where there are no
structures above and the alignment should take into consideration the ground
situation.
3.
So as to understand the impact of the proposals, there was need to develop
visual walk throughs/simulations in sensitive areas. The Commission requested
DMRC to submit details/information about the proposal so that it could
understand and appreciate the proposals, in context of the ground situation in
spatial context.
4.
The design of the station should incorporate the urban landscape and urban
design aspects. It was suggested that the design of stations should be finalised by
inviting the best talent for doing this job, on the basis of open competition.
Comprehensive development of Outer Rind Road and Ring Road Corridors
in North Delhi
While considering traffic and transport proposals the Commission invariably associates
experts from the field of traffic and transport, urban designers etc. The important
proposals considered during the year were :Annual Report 2011-12
41
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Comprehensive development of Elevated Corridor (Outer Ring Road) between
Vikaspuri & Meera Bagh.
Comprehensive development of Corridor (Outer Ring Road) between Mangolpuri
and Madhuban Chowk.
Comprehensive development of Corridor (Outer Ring Road) between Madhuban
Chowk and Mukarba Chowk.
Comprehensive Development of Corridor NH-1/Road no.50 between Mukarba
Chowk to Wazirabad Chowk.
Comprehensive development of Corridor on Ring Road between Azadpur and
Prembari Pul.
In general, the Commission, in respect of such proposals has been of the view
that there is a need to have an integrated plan for the proposed traffic movement in the
National Capital Territory of Delhi wherein the corridors which need development may
be formally identified. In recent years there has been a tendency to implement elevated
roads as piecemeal solution in numerous parts of the City. The elevated carriageway
needs to be understood with regard to their physical and visual impact on the built up
areas through which they pass as well as their impact on the connected networks.
Redevelopment of ISBT, Sarai Kale Khan
The proposal for redevelopment of Inter State Bus Terminus at Sarai Kale Khan
gained importance on account of the site being in the vicinity of a protected monument
namely, Humanyun’s Tomb and falling in a low laying area adjacent to the river Yamuna.
On account of this, the Commission considered the proposal in depth. The Commission
recommended that :
1.
The multi storeyed building block as proposed was not acceptable. The
buildings should not be more than 2-3 floors high and the development should
be low-rise.
2.
Since no proposals on the adjacent site of hotel was shown the Commission
observed that the basic controlling parameters particularly height should be
prescribed in context of the suggested low rise development proposal for ISBT.
The hotel should also be a low rise development.
EWS Housing Scheme
In view of the high level of influx of population into the capital city for economic reasons
a need for affordable housing has been felt for quite some time to cater to a significant
Annual Report 2011-12
42
section of the city’s population. The EWS housing proposals that received were
therefore welcome. The following proposals were considered by the Commission during
the year :1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-1, Sector-34,
Rohini.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-3 Sector-34,
Rohini.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Pocket-III, SectorG8, Narela.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Pocket-II, SectorG2-G6, Narela.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-6A, Sector-35,
Rohini.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-4A, Sector-34,
Rohini.
Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-2, Sector-34,
Rohini.
The main recommendations of the Commission on the proposal were as follows :
1.
To improve the open space system inside, the blocks on outer periphery to be
made parallel to the outside green.
2.
The elevations need to be improved.
3.
The system of garbage disposal be shown in plans.
4.
The water tanks should not be placed on outer edge at terrace level and placed
in such a manner so that these are not visible from the street.
5.
The location of the staircase in blocks should be towards the open green.
6.
Explore the possibility of shifting central green to a better location so that more
residents could use it.
7.
The community centre blocks could be brought closer to the green.
8.
The ESS block need to be re-located and placed nearer to the road.
Annual Report 2011-12
43
Administration and Organization
In terms of its mandate the Commission is required to meet atleast twice a
month. The Commission met 24 times during the year 2011-12. While proposals
received complete in all respects were considered on first come first served basis,
important projects were considered on priority.
The number of proposals received during the year is listed at Annexure-II. The
break-up of these proposals as on 31.3.2012 is as follows:1.
2.
3.
4.
Proposals approved
Proposals considered and on which observations given
Proposals on which material pending
Proposals considered and returned/rejected/deferred
Total
187
19
00
02
................
208
DUAC is a non-commercial, non-earning body which functions in public interest
free of cost to the beneficiaries. The Commission does not have any revenue generation
of its own. The entire financial requirement is non-plan in nature and is met by grant-inaid from the Central Government.
For the year 2011-12 the Budget outlay (BE) of DUAC as approved by the
Government was Rs.230.00 lakhs and Revised Estimated (RE) was Rs.280.00 lakhs. The
grant received from the Government was Rs.280.00 lakhs. Against this the expenditure
during the year was Rs.271.00 lakhs and balance carried over to the next financial year
for payment of salary for the month of March 2012 during first week of April 2012 and
of the administrative expenses during April 2012. The first instalment of grant-in-aid is
received only towards the end of April each year.
Official Language Policy of the Govt.
An inspection by the high level Parliamentary Committee on Official Language on
compliance of the provisions of the Official Language Act by the Commission in its dayto-day functioning was conducted in September 2011. Active steps have been taken for
implementation of the recommendations of the Committee and implementation report
sent to the Ministry on all recommendations. With a view to increase the use of Hindi
Annual Report 2011-12
44
for official work quarterly Karyashalas (Workshops) were arranged during the year.
Besides the officers/employees of the Commission attended Karyashalas arranged by
other organisations.
Vigilance Activities
The Secretary of the Commission functions as its Chief Vigilance Officer. In its
day-to-day functioning the Commission takes due care to observe the provisions of the
vigilance manuals and other guidelines pertaining to purchases etc. brought out by the
Central Vigilance Commission.
To bring about transparency in its functioning the Commission has been
uploading the minutes of its meetings on the DUAC website. Further, to facilitate the
stakeholders they can now view the status on their proposal on the DUAC website
(www.duac.org) from the date of reference to final disposal. The stakeholders can also
observe the status of their proposal vis-à-vis other proposals referred to the
Commission.
During the year 2011-12 no case of corruption or any other vigilance matter was
registered.
In terms of the guidelines prescribed by the Government, the Commission
organized a Vigilance Awareness Week in the month of November 2011. The week
started with the Pledge administered by the Chief Vigilance Officer to the other officers
and staff of the Commission. Banners and posters on vigilance awareness were
displayed, lectures organized on conduct rules and vigilance awareness in general.
Redressal of Public Grievances
The Commission has minimal direct dealing with the public. It receives very few
grievances/complaints from the public. However, Commission has already appointed its
Secretary as Nodal Officer for receiving the complaints from the public and acknowledge
the same within 48 hours. For redressal and final decision in respect of any particular
complaint, the same is placed before the Commission at its next meeting from the date
of receipt by the Nodal Officer. The Commission’s decision in response to the complaint
is conveyed within a fortnight.
Annual Report 2011-12
45
Citizen’s Charter
The Citizen’s Charter of DUAC is available on its website (www.duac.org). It
contains information as required to be displayed in terms of the Right to Information
Act.
In terms of guidelines of the Prime Minister’s Office to implement good
governance model in Government organizations a self-assessment was carried out by
the Commission. The proposal was accepted by the Ministry of Urban Development. The
results of the self-assessment are contained at Annexure-III.
Right to Information
The Administrative Officer has been designated as the Central Public Information
Officer of the Commission. He is assisted by an Assistant Central Public Information
Officer. Secretary of the Commission also acts as the First Appellate Authority for the
purpose of RTI Act. During the year 2011-12 the Commission received 45 RTI
applications. Of these replies were sent in all cases. There was no case for first and
second appeal.
The Secretariat of the Commission has a total strength of 30 officials headed by
Secretary and assisted by the Assistant Secretary (Tech.) and the Administrative Officer
for day-to-day functioning. The Secretariat of the Commission has also been entrusted
with the added responsibility of functioning as the Secretariat of the Heritage
Conservation Committee which is headed by the Additional Secretary in the Ministry of
Urban Development, Government of India and the Secretary DUAC is the MemberSecretary of the Committee. No new posts were created during the year nor any fresh
appointment made for the functioning of HCC.
The Results Framework Document of DUAC for the year 2011-12 was prepared
and finalised in terms of guidelines issued by the Government.
Anti-Terrorism Day was observed on 21.5.2011 and Sadbhavna Diwas on
19.11.2011.
Annual Report 2011-12
46
Annexure-I
No. 1(2)82-DUAC
March 11, 2011
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5
MEMORANDUM
Sub:
Use of Traditional building crafts in buildings as Work of Art.
The Central Government in 1972 through the then Ministry of Works and Housing
Memorandum No.18012(23)-W1 dated 5th June 1972 issued guidelines in terms of which every
public project should earmark atleast 1% of the project cost for the work of art in public
buildings. Unfortunately these orders, except in the case of a few prestigious buildings, have
largely not been acted upon. Often it is observed that the work of art is added to a building
project as an afterthought. In many cases there is lack of clarity on the nature of work of art.
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri),
11 pt, Not Bold
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri),
11 pt, Not Bold
The Delhi Urban Art Commission has from time to time emphasized that the work of art
in public projects needs to be an integral part of the project and could include the following :1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Outdoor sculptures
Murals and frescos
Mobiles and bas-relief
Folk and Tribal Art
Artisan craft
Indoor sculptures
Other art forms relevant to the habitat
Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging:
0.38", Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: sing
Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1,
3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligne
at: 0.25" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at:
0.75", Tab stops: Not at 0.75"
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
The Commission at its meeting held on 09.03.2011 has further resolved that building
elements created using traditional building craft techniques, using traditional materials and tools
and used as an integral part of the building will be considered as 'art work' required to be
included in public buildings. This can include hand carved stone elements, hand carved wood,
terracotta, decorative wrought iron, amongst other traditional materials. Each region of India
has traditional building crafts and this step is taken to encourage this craftsmanship in
construction of new buildings and encourage the sensitive use of traditional materials.
It may be ensured that the work of art is conceptualized at the time of formulation of
the project itself and be brought to the Commission so that it can be completed alongwith the
building project. The Commission while considering cases for grant of NOC for completion
certificates entertains applications for the same only if these are accompanied with photographs
of the works of art in place. Each project of work of art will be assessed separately on a case to
case basis by the Commission.
..............2.............
Annual Report 2011-12
47
Formatted: Normal, Justified, Indent: First
line: 0.5", Tab stops: Not at 5"
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri),
11 pt, Not Bold, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri),
11 pt, Not Bold, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri),
11 pt, Not Bold, Not Italic
Formatted: Normal, Right, Indent: First line
0.5", Tab stops: Not at 5"
Formatted: Normal, Justified, Indent: First line:
0.5", Tab stops: Not at 5"
-2-
The local bodies and other local authorities while sending proposals to the Commission
are requested to ensure that the amount spent by the project proponent on the work of art is in
terms of the aforesaid guidelines of the Government.
Formatted: No Spacing, Tab stops: Not at 5"
Sd/(¶ãÌã¶ããè¦ã ‡ã슽ããÀ)
ÔããäÞãÌã
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
18.
19.
20.
21.
The Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
The Additional Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
The Joint Secretary (DL), Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
The Director (DD), Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Sectt., I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
The Chief Town Planner, TCPO, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
The Director General, CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
Additional Director General (Arch.), CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
Engineer-in-Chief, PWD (GNCTD), MSO Bldg., I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
Vice-Chairman, DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi.
The Commissioner, MCD, Town Hall, Delhi.
The Chairperson, NDMC, Palika Kendra, New Delhi.
Commissioner (Plng.), DDA, Vikas Minar, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
Chief Town Planner, MCD, Nigam Bhawan, Kashmere Gate, Delhi.
Executive Engineer (Bldg.), HQ, MCD, Town Hall, Delhi.
The Director (Bldg.), DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi.
The Chief Architect, NDMC, Palika Kendra, New Delhi.
The Chief Architect, DDA, Vikas Minar, I.P. Estate, New Delhi.
The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, DMRC, Metro Bhawan, Fire Brigade Lane,
Barakhamba Road, New Delhi.
The Chief Engineer, DTTDC, 10th floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi.
The Additional Commissioner (Land & Bldg.), Delhi Police, Police HQ, MSO Bldg., I.P.
Estate, New Delhi.
The General Manager (Arch.), Airport Authority of India, Operational Offices, Gurgaon
Road, Delhi-37.
Copy to:
1.
Chairman, DUAC
2.
Members, DUAC
3.
Notice Board
4.
Website
5.
AS(T)/AO
6.
All concerned in the office.
Annual Report 2011-12
48
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 p
Not Bold, Not Italic
Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 p
Annexure-II
LIST OF PROPOSALS
Approved
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 63, SUNDER
NAGAR
PLANS IN R/O BOUNDARY WALL FOR SOUTH BLOCK, DALHOUSIE ROAD
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 45, SUNDER
NAGAR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O ROOPVILLA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 2, SECTOR-19B,
DWARKA
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION & STAFF QUARTERS AT KHAJURI KHAS
DEMOLITION/RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O RAJASWA BHAWAN - NATIONAL TAX
HEAD QUARTER AT KASTURBA GANDHI MARG
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENCE ON HOUSE NO. 4579/15 AT DARYA GANJ.
REVISED LAYOUT PLAN FOR GURU GOVIND SINGH GOVT. HOSPITAL AT
RAGHUBIR NAGAR
PLANS FOR WCDMA TOWER AT 412, AIR FORCE STATION, RACE COURSE.
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O BHARTI COLLEGE AT C-4, JANAKPURI
ADDITION/ALTERATIONS IN R/O SPECIAL WARD BLOCK , 5TH AND 6TH BLOCK,
SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL, RAJENDER NAGAR
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O FILLING-CUM-SERVICE STATION FOR IOCL AT POOTH
KHURD
ADDITION/ALTERATIONS OF EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING OF THE SADHU
VASWANI INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL FOR GIRLS AT SHANTI NIKETAN
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INTEGRATED OFFICE COMPLEX FOR ISRO AT PLOT NO.
7, PLANNING AREA CENTRE, SADIQ NAGAR
REVISED PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 5 MAN SINGH ROAD
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O HOTEL AT PLOT NO. A-2, COMMUNITY
CENTRE,ROAD NO. 43, PITAMPURA
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O HOTEL AT PLOT NO. A-1, COMMUNITY
CENTRE,ROAD NO. 43, PITAMPURA
PLANS IN R/O P.C. TEACHING BLOCK AT AIIMS, ANSARI NAGAR
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMUNITY CENTRE AT PLOT NO. A,
BLOCK-A, VIKAS PURI.
PLANS FOR UNDERGROUND CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN EXISTING SUPREME
COURT & PROPOSED ADDITIONAL OFFICE COMPLEX AT MATHURA ROAD
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 8B RAJPUR ROAD, CIVIL
LINES
ADDITION/ALTERATIONS OF BUILDING PLANS IN R/O TESTING & DEVELOPING
LAB & OFFICE FOR IIP, NORTHERN REGION OF PLOT NO. 21, FIE PATPARGANJ
DEMOLITION/RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O 16, KAUTILYA MARG
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIALGROUP HOUSING NEAR SUBHASH NAGAR
METRO STATION, SUBHASH NAGAR PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL GROUP
HOUSING NEAR SUBHASH NAGAR METRO STATION, SUBHASH NAGAR
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O GLOBAL MALL, PITAMPURA
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 80, SUNDER
NAGAR
Annual Report 2011-12
49
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
PLANS IN R/O ELECTRIC SUB STATION AT CANNING LANE
PLANS IN R/O ELECTRIC SUB STATION AT RAJINDER PRASAD LANE
REVISED PLANS IN R/O EXTENSION OF PARLIAMENT HOUSE ANNEXE
PLANS IN R/O BOUNDARY WALL FOR PARLIAMENT HOUSE ANNEXE, SANSAD
MARG
PLANS FOR LUXURY HOTEL AT ASSET NO. 3, DELHI AEROCITY, INDIRA GANDHI
INT. AIRPORT.
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTILEVEL CAR PARKING WITH
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT ROHINI METRO STATION WEST
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL CAR PARKING WITH
COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT RAJOURI GARDEN
ADD./ALT. IN R/O I.P. BUS DEPOT AT I.P. ESTATE,ITO
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION-CUM-DCP OFFICE AT
DABRI
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL & MULTI LEVEL PARKING AT
PLOT NO. P-2,NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, DISTT. CENTRE WAzIRPUR.
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION & STAFF QUARTERS AT JYOTI NAGAR,
SHAHDARA
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL PARKING WITH COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT METRO STATION, JANAKPURI WEST
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 4578/15, AGGARWAL
ROAD, DARYA GANJ
REVISED ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O SWEDEN EMBASSY, 4-5,
NYAYA MARG, CHANAKYA PURI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O KABIR SR. SEC. SCHOOL AT POCKET-B-5,SECTOR-3,
ROHINI
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE POST ON PLOT NO. 4, POCKET-4,
BINDAPUR, DWARKA
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SR. SEC. SCHOOL FOR MONTFORT AT ASHOK VIHAR
PH.I
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SHUBH LAXMI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 13-B,
SECTOR-6, DWARKA
PLANS IN R/O HOSTEL BLOCK 1,2,3 AND DINNING BLOCK FOR ATTENDANTS OF
PATIENTS AT AIIMS, ANSARI NAGAR
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O REFURBISHMENT & EXTENSION OF ESIC HOSPITAL AT
BASAI DARAPUR
ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O BUNGALOW NO. 4, KUSHAK ROAD
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DIN CGHS AT PLOT NO. 3, SECTOR-4,
DWARKA
DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O PLOT NO. 8, AMRITA
SHERGILL MARG
REVISED LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SARAI BUILDING FOR HELP
SOCIETY AT SERVICE CENTRE NO.11, VILLAGE DALLUPURA
PLANS FOR FLATTED FACTORY BUILDING AT PLOT NO. F-79-80 IN OKHLA
INDUSTRIAL AREA PH-1
ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O EXTENSION TO PRESIDENT ESTATE
AUDITORIUM IN SCHEDULE 'B', PRESIDENT'S ESTATE, RASHTRAPATI BHAWAN
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION AT 'C' BLOCK, JANAKPURI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O ESIC DISPENSARY & HEALTH CENTRE AT NARELA
PLANS FOR DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O 31, BABAR ROAD
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O KRISHNA TEMPLE BUILDING FOR ISKCON AT PLOT NO.
Annual Report 2011-12
50
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
3, SECTOR-25, ROHINI PHASE-III
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION CUM STAFF QTRS.AT
SECTOR-16C, DWARKA
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RAM LAL ANAND COLLEGE AT PLOT NO. 5,
DHAULA KUAN
REVISED LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATIONS AND STAFF
QUARTERS AT NEW ASHOK NAGAR.
ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O ST. THOMAS SCHOOL AT MANDIR
MARG
DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O 54, GOLF LINK
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O TYPE-VII BUNGALOW AT 30 GURUDWARA RAKAB
GANJ ROAD
REVISED PLANS IN R/O COMMUNITY FACILITY AT REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI
NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH (EAST)
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT PLOT NO. 40,
BLOCK-A, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PASCHIM PURI.
PLANS IN R/O UNDERGROUND PARKING AT ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL
SCIENCES AIIMS
REVISED LAYOUT PLAN FOR KASTURBA BALIKA VIDHYALAYA SR. SEC. SCHOOL,
HARIJAN SEVAK SANGH, ISHWAR NAGAR
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O EXAMINATION BUILDING AT UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTISTOREYED STAFF HOUSING FOR IGIB AT
MATHURA ROAD CAMPUS
ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O JESUS & MARY COLLEGE, CHANAKYA PURI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AT ROHINI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MAHARISHI BALMIKI HOSPITAL AT POOTH KHURD
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O REFURBISHMENT AND EXTENSION OF ESIC HOSPITAL
AT BASAI DARAPUR.
REVISED PLANS IN R/O 40, AMRITA SHERGILL MARG
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DAP LINES & RESIDENCES, SECTOR-9
DWARKA
DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O BRITISH SCHOOL SOCIETY,
CHANAKYA PURI
ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O JUDGES CHAMBERS AT SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O. SERVICE APARTMENT PLOT NO. 4B, MAYUR
VIHAR DISTRICT CENTRE.
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SANMATI CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 19A,
SECTOR-6, DWARKA
LAYOUT AND BUILDING PLANS IN R/O APNI CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 5B, SECTOR11, DWARKA PHASE-I
PLANS IN R/O REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH(EAST)
TYPE-VIII BUNGLOW NO. 1 TO 14
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MAHARISHI DAYANAND CGHS LTD., PLOT
NO. B-4, VASANT KUNJ.
ADDITION/ALTERATION OF SHRI GANINATH CGHS AT PLOT NO.1, SECTOR-5,
DWARKA
ADDITION/ALTERATION FOR ISPAT CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 29, SECTOR-4,
DWARKA
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SHAMAN VIHAR CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 9,
SECTOR-23, DWARKA, PHASE-I
Annual Report 2011-12
51
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
AICTE HEAD QUARTERS BUILDING AT JNU CAMPUS
PROPOSED BUILDING PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND
FLATTED FACTORY COMPLEX AT PLOT NO. 15, SWANTANTRA BHARAT MILLS
(SBM) COMPLEX SHIVAJI MARG
LAYOUT PLAN OF NATIONAL AGRICULTURE SCIENCE CENTRE (NASC), IARI, PUSA
CAMPUS
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O GULISTAN CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 1B,
SECTOR-13, DWARKA
REVISED PLANS IN RESPECT OF IMD COMPLEX AT LODHI ROAD
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O NANDA DEVI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 19.
SECTOR-10, DWARKA
DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O 4 BHAGWAN DAS ROAD
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE FOR SOCIALIST EDUCATION AT PLOT NO.L
9/1, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, ARUNA ASAF ALI MARG.
DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O 119, GOLF LINK
REVISED PLANS IN R/O LITTLE THEATRE GROUP AT COPERNICUS MARG
POLICE HOUSING SECTOR 19 PH 1 DWARKA
PLANS IN R/O BUNGALOW NO 1 AT 7 MOTI LAL NEHRU PLACE
PLANS IN R/O BUNGALOW NO 2 AT 7 MOTI LAL NEHRU PLACE
ADDITION / ALTERATION IN R/O NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA
EXTENSION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE BUILDING PLOT NO 32 SECTOR
14 DWARKA PHASE 2
PLANS IN R/O 14 SUNEHRI BAGH LBZ AREA
PLANS IN R/O 10 SUNEHRI BAGH LBZ AREA
REVISED PLANS IN R/O 47 AMRITA SHERGILL MARG
PLANS IN R/O P.C. TEACHING BLOCK AT AIIMS, ANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION & STAFF HOUSING AT GREATER
KAILASH-1
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR LALA
SHER SINGH MEMORIAL JEEWAN VIGYAN TRUST SOCIETY AT SECTOR-22.
DWARKA
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING FOR NATIONAL TRUST FOR
THE HANDICAPPED AT A-2, SPECIAL INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SHAHEED JEET
SINGH MARG
PLANS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BHARTY REALTY AT ASSET NO. 11 AT
HOSPITALITY DISTT. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
PLANS FOR BIRD AIRPORT HOTELS AT ASSET NO. 10, HOSPITALITY DISTRICT,
DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O 17, KAUTILYA MARG
PLANS IN R/O ACCOMMODATION FOR ESSENTIAL OPERATIONAL STAFF OF
NORTHERN RAILWAY CHANAKYA PURI
LAYOUT PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BUILDING COMPLEXD FOR SUPREME COURT
OF INDIA AT PRAGATI MAIDAN
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DCP OFFICE & RESIDENTIAL QUARTERS FOR
DELHI POLICE AT SECTOR-5, ROHINI
BUILDING PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND FLATTED FACTORY COMPLEX, EWS
BLOCK NO. 1,2,3,4 & 5 AT SWATANTRA BHARAT MILLS (SBM) COMPLEX,
SHIVAJI MARG
REVISED LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O VICTORIA GARDEN GROUP
HOUSING AT RING ROAD AZADPUR
Annual Report 2011-12
52
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE POST AT ANAND PARBAT
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O LABORATORY BLOCK FOR CHEMISTRY DEPTT. AT DELHI
UNIVERSITY NORTH CAMPUS
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O QUETTA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 5C, SECTOR-22,
DWARKA
PLANS IN R/O 18600 EWS HOUSES ON PREFAB TECHNOLOGY AT SITE-4A,
SECTOR-34, ROHINI.
PLANS IN R/O 18600 EWS HOUSES ON PREFAB TECHNOLOGY AT SITE-6A,
SECTOR-35, ROHINI.
PLANS IN R/O PRIDE HOTEL AT ASSET NO. 5A, DELHI AEROCITY, DELHI
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BHARTI REALITY AT ASSET NO. 8,
DELHI AEROCITY, DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O NEW DELHI KALI BARI TEMPLE, MANDIR MARG
PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BHARTI REALITY AT ASSET NO. 7,
DELHI AEROCITY, DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
REVISED BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 10, JAMUNA
ROAD, CIVIL LINES
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE FOR LIVER & BILLIARY SCIENCE
HOSPITAL AT SECTOR-D-I & D-II, VASANT KUNJ
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT
DEVELOPMENT AT SECTOR-9, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O LAXMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AT HAUZ KHAS
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O GROUP HOUSING AT E-BLOCK, GREATER KAILASH1.
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART)&
MOTI BAGH(EAST)- TYPE VI, TOWER NO. 8
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O TYPE VI, TOWER NO. 7, REDEVELOPMENT OF
NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH (EAST)
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL AT SECTOR-C, VASANT KUNJ
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O SLEUTHS CGHS AT PLOT NO. 6, SECTOR - 19B,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O FLATTED FACTORY COMPLEX, BLOCK - 4, 15
SHIVAJI MARG
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O REDEVELOPMENT OF GPRA (A) TYPE-II HOUSING
(300 NOS.) (B)11 KV ESS AT ALIGANJ JOR BAGH
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENCE AT 15, CENTRAL LANE, BENGALI
MARKET
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENCE AT 3, TILAK MARG
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O BALAJI MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH CENTRE
AT PLOT NO. 8, I.P. EXT., SHAHDARA.
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 196, GOLF LINKS
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O GIRLS SR. SEC. SCHOOL FOR HELEN JERWOOD
MEMORIAL EDU. SOCIETY AT PLOT NO. 4A, NORTH END, MODEL TOWN III.
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 195, GOLF
LINK
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O FAKRUDDIN MEMORIAL CGHS AT PLOT NO. 18,
SECTOR 10, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MAHAGUN HOTEL AT PLOT NO. 32, CBD
SHAHDARA
Annual Report 2011-12
53
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O VIDYUT CGHS AT PLOT NO. 2, SECTOR-22, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O NEW RAJPUT CGHS AT PLOT NO. 23, SECTOR-12,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O TYPE-IV MULTI-STOREYED TOWER-9,
REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR(PART)& MOTI BAGH (EAST)
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O ESS NO. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 &10, REDEVELOPMENT OF
NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH (EAST)
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O THE UPKARI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 9, SECTOR-12,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. D-9, DISTT.
CENTRE NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, WAZIRPUR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MAHAJAN SHREE CGHS AT PLOT NO. 13, SECTOR23, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O DHARAM CGHS AT PLOT NO. 18, SECTOR-18,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT PLOT NO. 8,
MANGLAM PLACE, SECTOR-3, ROHINI
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O VVIP GUEST HOUSE FOR GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL
AT 2 CIRCULAR ROAD, CHANAKYAPURI.
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O FOREIGN SERVICE TRAINING INSTITUTE AT OLD
JNU CAMPUS
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMONWEALTH GAMES VILLAGE NEAR
AKSHARDHAM TEMPLE
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O WHITE ROSE CGHS AT PLOT NO.7, SECTOR-13,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O EROS METRO MALL AT PLOT NO. 8, SECTOR-14,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 9 PANCHSHEEL MARG
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL PARKING CUM COMMERCIAL
COMPLEX AT SAROJINI NAGAR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL PARKING-CUM-COMMERCIAL
COMPLEX AT BABA KHARAK SINGH MARG
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 2, S.P. MARG
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O S.B. YOUTH CGHS AT PLOT NO. 6B, SECTOR-2,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O INDEPENDENT CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING FOR
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AT SADIQ NAGAR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O DELHI COMMONWEALTH WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION
AT KAILASH COLONY EXTN. ZAMRUDPUR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O JAWAHARLAL NEHRU BHAWAN, 23-D, JANPATH
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O THE DELHI STATE NEWSPAPAER EMPLOYEES
FEDERATION CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 1 SECTOR-19, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O JAI MATA KALYANI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 31, SECTOR4, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O SERVICE APARTMENT IIDL PLOT NO. 4A, DISTT.
CENTRE MAYUR VIHAR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O B.R. DHAWAN CHARITABLE TRUST HOSPITAL AT
SECTOR-12,DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O CHITRAKOOT DHAM CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 2,
SECTOR-2, SECTOR-19, DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 54 TODARMAL ROAD
Annual Report 2011-12
54
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC FINANCE AND
POLICY AT PLOT NO. A-17, SOUTH OF IIT
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 14&16, AURANGZEB ROAD
COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/O PROPERTY KNOWN AS CBI HEADQUARTERS
ENVELOP-5-B, CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O VEENA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 5D, SECTOR-22,
DWARKA
COMPLETION OF COMMERCIAL COMPLEX FOR PRESTIGE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD.
AT PLOT NO 02 ROAD NO 44 PITAMPURA
COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/O SADBHAWANA CGHS PLOT NO 11 SECTOR 11
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 19 BABAR ROAD
COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/O DR. LAL PATHOLOGY LABORATORY SECTOR
18 ROHINI
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O HOTEL BUILDING PLOT NO 3B1 TWIN DISTTRICT
CENTRE SECTOR-10 ROHINI
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL CENTRE AT PLOT NO. B-7, NETAJI
SUBHASH PLACE, DISTRICT CENTRE WAZIRPUR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O PLOT NO. 3, TEES JANUARY MARG
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O BHAI VEER SINGH SAHITYA SADAN, BHAI VEER
SINGH MARG, GOLE MARKET
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. B-1, NETAJI
SUBHASH PLACE,WAZIRPUR DISTT. CENTRE
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O HOTEL BUILDING FOR BRILLIANT BUILDTECH PVT.
LTD. AT SHALIMAR BAGH
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O GUEST HOUSE FOR GOVT.OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT PLOT NO. 12, IHC POCKET, VASANT VIHAR
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O CHANKYA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 23, SECTOR-4,
DWARKA
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MINISTER'S BUNGALOW AT PLOT NO. 15, SUNEHRI
BAGH
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O AMERICAN EMBASSY SCHOOL, CHANDERGUPTA
MARG, CHANAKYA PURI
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O BPCL MODERN SERVICE STATION, JANPATH,
CONNAUGHT PLACE
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O PEARLS BUSINESS PARK PLOT NO. D-7, DISTRICT
CENTRE (NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE) WAZIRPUR
Annual Report 2011-12
55
Observations given
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
LAYOUT PLAN IN R/O RAJ KUMARI AMRIT KAUR COLLEGE OF NURSING AT
LAJPAT NAGAR
LAYOUT PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (GROUP HOUSING)AT
VISHWAVIDYALAYA METRO, CIVIL LINES
REVISED LAYOUT PLAN OF ESIC HOSPITAL COMPLEX, SECTOR-15, ROHINI
COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE OF INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINES AT
VILLAGE KHERA DABUR, NAJAFGARH
LAYOUT PLAN OF GOVT. SR. SEC. SCHOOL AT VILLAGE HASTSAL
PROPOSED DIABETIC ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC CARE CENTRE AT GTB
HOSPITAL SHAHDARA DELHI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL PLOT NO. 1-D, NORTH END ROAD, CIVIL
LINES
REVISED LAYOUT PLAN OF DEEPAK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT PLOT NO. 5-6,
VIKAS MARG EXTN. KARKARDOOMA
PLANS IN R/O 268 EWS HOUSING AT VACANT POCKET BEHIND RAMGARH
COLONY, JAHANGIRPURI
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DESHBANDHU COLLEGE, KALKAJI
REDEVELOPMENT OF ISBT AT ANAND VIHAR
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O OFFICE BUILDING FOR INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH
ORGANISATION (ISRO) AT SADIQ NAGAR
PLANS IN R/O PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK HEADQUARTERS, PLOT NO. 4,
SECTOR-10, DWARKA
REVISED LAYOUT PLAN FOR GENERAL POOL OFFICE BUILDING, PUSHPA
BHAWAN AT PUSHP VIHAR
ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O HOTEL QUEEN ROAD, 19, ASHOK ROAD
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O NARAINA VIHAR CLUB AT NARAINA VIHAR
BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MAHARAJA SURAJMAL INSTITUTE AT C-4, JANAKPURI
ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O SOUTH INDIA CLUB, SOUTH INDIA
ASSOCIATION, MANDIR MARG
LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTILEVEL PARKING AT PLOT NO. P-1,
DISTT. CENTRE WAZIRPUR
Annual Report 2011-12
56
Rejected/ returned/deferred
1. COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O HOTEL PROJECT PLOT NO.1A, DISTRICT CENTRE,
HARI NAGAR.
2. LAYOUT PLAN FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ON NANGLOI NAJAFGARH ROAD,
BAPROLA.
Annual Report 2011-12
57
Annexure-III
Template for Service Delivery Statement
Vision Statement
Guidance Text : ‘VISION’ is the long term goal of the Ministry/Department
Vision of the Ministry/Department
Preserving developing and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental
design within Delhi.
Mission Statement
Guidance Text : ‘MISSION’ is the short-term strategy or plan for achieving the vision.
Mission for the year
(i)
(ii)
To advise the Central Government in the matter of preserving, developing and
maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design of Delhi, and
To advice the local authorities in respect of any project of building and engineering
operation or any development proposal which affects or is likely to affect the
aesthetic quality of the surroundings or any public amenity provide therein.
Objectives for the year identified by the Ministry/Department
Guidance Text : State the objectives identified along with measurable performance
targets that have been set for these objectives
No.
1.
Objectives
Measurable Performance Targets
a) To bring about value addition on
building
and
engineering
proposals on aspects relating to
functionality and aesthetics.
b) To scrutinize and give statutory
decision on proposals referred to
the Commission in terms of its
mandate.
c) Interactions with stakeholders on
city level issues.
d) Quick redressal of Grievances
e) Meeting with statutory obligations
(a) No targets can be set as number of
proposals referred by local bodies is
not known in advance.
(b) However, targets are set in respect of
macro level exercises.
Annual Report 2011-12
58
w.r.t. Parliament.
Client Groups and their requirements from the Ministry/ Department
Guidance Text : Identify client groups along with their requirements.
Client Groups
Requirement
1.
Local bodies – NDMC, MCD, DDA
Advice on proposals referred by them
2.
Govt. Department
Advice on specific exercise entrusted to
the Commission
3.
Architect/Promoters
Advice on conceptual proposals referred
to the Commission by them.
Consultation with Stakeholders
Guidance Text : Give the details of stakeholders involved/contacted in charter
formulation and for arriving at the above stated Objectives/Targets
Constitution of Charter Task Force
Designation
Details of individuals/institutions consulted
1.
Department officials
Consulted
2.
Representative
from
concerned departments
3.
Supplier of Services/Products
--
4.
NGOs
--
5.
RWAs
--
6.
Unions
--
7.
Citizens/Representatives
--
8.
Any other
other
--
Various experts
Consultation Meetings Conducted/Consultations Carried Out
1.
--
--
2.
--
--
Annual Report 2011-12
59
Charter Characteristics and Dissemination
Guidance Text : Indicate whether the characteristics given below are present in the
charter and method of dissemination utilized (Yes/No)
Language
Simplicity
Adequacy
Local Language
Tabular Form
Time Norms
Hindi 
Simple Language
Documents Required
English
Brief Statements 
Exceptions
Reference to Details
Fees/Charges
Remedial Measures
Any
Methods for Dissemination
1.
Meetings, Seminars and Conference
The Commission organizes meetings
in terms of its Conduct of Business
Regulations, 1976 for disposal of
work allocated in terms of its
mandate.
It
also
organizes
seminars,
workshops/exhibition
from time to time on important
issues
2.
Newspaper advertisements
--
3.
Leaflets
--
4.
Brochures
--
5.
Information printed in documents given to customers --
6.
Public Address System at Citizen interface points
--
7.
Any Other
--
Means Available for obtaining feedback
Guidance Text : Indicate whether the means indicated below are available/used and
whether DARPG guidelines regarding these are being followed.
No.
Means by which Department obtains feedback
(Yes/No)
DARPG Guidelines
(Yes/No/NA)
1.
Written Communication handed personally by
Yes
Annual Report 2011-12
60
clients/citizens
8.
2.
Written Communication through Post/Courier
Yes
3.
Telephone
Yes
4.
Verbal through Personal Visit
Yes
5.
Website
6.
Workshops/Seminars and Conferences
7.
Complaint/Suggestion Boxes
-Yes
Any aggrieved, individual
etc. can approach the
Commission or its Secretary
and the representation is
duly considered.
Any other
--
Recording and analyzing feedback
Guidance Text : Indicate whether there exists a process for classification of feedback
and give the results obtained from this process
Is there a process for classifying feedback (Yes/No) No
Does this process cover the following communication types
Communication Type
State Yes/No
1.
Suggestions
-
2.
Grievances
-
3.
Compliments
-
4.
Queries
-
After analyzing feedback in each of the above categories, briefly state which are the
grievance prone areas requiring process changes/or additional outlays
--
Annual Report 2011-12
61
Norms for Grievance Handling
Guidance Text : Indicate time norms (if decided) for acknowledgement/redressal and
interim/final reply to petitioner
Grievance state
Time Norm present
(Yes/No)
Relevant Time Norm
Acknowledgement of Grievance
2 days
--
Redressal of complaints
15 days
--
Interim/Final reply
15 days
--
Achievement of Objectives
Guidance Text : Mention specific Objective and Performance Target along with the
action needed/planned for them
Have performance target been achieved for each objective
Yes/No
State the following for each objective set by the Ministry/Department in the previous year
Objective
The minutes of the Commission’s meetings are
uploaded on its website immediately after the
Performance Target
meeting. The web based system for tracking the
progress of proposals referred to the Commission
Actual Performance
till the time of its disposal to bring about greater
Reasons for not achieving (if actual transparency in the organization has been put in
performance doesn’t match/exceed place.
performance target)
The Annual Report of the Commission indicating the
Action Needed/Planned
performance during the year is also being uploaded
on its website every year.
Learning
Initiatives based on lessons learnt
Guidance Text : Mention specific initiatives undertaken based on learnings above.
Initiatives planned for Setting/Improving standards and achieving them
1.
File tracking system has been introduced based on the requirements of the
stakeholders.
Tracking Citizen/Client Satisfaction
Annual Report 2011-12
62
Guidance Text : Mention if there is a process to determine stakeholder satisfaction and
briefly describe the issues after analysis.
Is there a process in place to track Citizen/Client satisfaction
Grievience Redressal System is in place.
Public
If yes, state whether it incorporates the following indicators
No.
Indicators of Citizen Satisfaction
Compiled (Yes/No)
1.
Newspaper Reports
Yes
2.
Inspection Report Comments
Yes
3.
Senior Officer Visit Comments
--
4.
Client Survey Indicators
--
5.
Any other
--
Briefly state the issues identified by the above process
Efficiency and transparency of the organisation.
Strengths
The Commission comprises a body of eminent experts who act as a watch-dog in respect of
the City’s development.
Areas requiring improvement
The concerns of the Commission include :
1. Maintenance of heritage sites which are under threat due to pressures of development
activities.
2. Keeping a check on the green cover of the city and trying to develop a network of green
areas in the city.
3. Despite high level of investment on road infrastructure the traffic scenario in Delhi
continues to be dismal. This calls for proper traffic management plans and their effective
implementation.
Any other Significant Issues
--
Improving Citizen/Client Focus and satisfaction
Guidance Text : Briefly state the measures planned in areas identified from the analysis
of stakeholder satisfaction
No.
Measures for making improvement in above identified areas
Annual Report 2011-12
63
--
--
Improving Employee Capabilities
Is the required infrastructure available
No.
Minimum
Guidelines
Yes/No
Infrastructure
Last Updation
Comment on
Date
Current Status
1.
Adequate Furniture
Yes
Yes
2.
Availability of Toilet/s
Yes
Yes
3.
Availability of Electricity
Yes
Yes
4.
Any other relevant issues
State areas that need attention
While the working environment of the employees is conducive their service conditions
compared to their counterparts in the Central Govt. is poor which has a demoralizing
effect on them. The service conditions need to be brought at par with other similar
organizations and the Govt. employees to bring out the best output from the employees.
Action Planned in the above identified areas
Pension Scheme at par with Central Government employees
Medical Scheme for retired employees
Residential Accomodation
Guidance Text : Briefly state the capability building efforts being made in the
Ministry/department along with the areas focused and improvements resulted
Trainings
Details (Duration, Location etc.)
--
Focus Area/s
Improvement Achieved
Computer proficiency Almost all employees are
computer literate
Counseling
Details (Duration, Location etc.)
--
Focus Area/s
Improvement Achieved
--
--
Focus Area/s
Improvement Achieved
Other Tools
Details (Duration, Location etc.)
Annual Report 2011-12
64
--
--
--
Minimum Infrastructure Requirement
Guidance Text : Briefly state whether required infrastructure is available, whether
Ministry/Department has issued guidelines in this regard and indicate areas that need
attention along with Action planned in these area.
Annual Report 2011-12
65
Acknowledgement
The Commission would like to place on record its thanks to its
Advisors, Officers of Government Departments, the Delhi
Development Authority, the Municipal Corporation
of Delhi, the New Delhi Municipal Council and practicing
architects who have unhesitatingly given their time
and assistance to the Commission in the
performance of its functions.
Annual Report 2011-12
66