Annual Report 2011 - 12 Delhi Urban Art Commission India Habitat Centre,Core-6A Lodhi Road New Delhi - 110 003 Annual Report 2011-12 28 DELHI URBAN ART COMMISSION Upto 2.6.2011 Chairman Prof. K.T. Ravindran Members Prof. M. Shaheer Prof. Nayanjot Lahiri Shri Ratish Nanda Dr. M.M. Kutty, JS(DL) From 3.6.2011 Chairman Shri Raj Rewal Members Smt. Sonali Bhagwati Shri Eric P. Mall Shri Satish Khanna Additional Secretary (UD) Officers Shri Navneet Kumar Shri Vinod Kumar Shri Amit Mukherji Annual Report 2011-12 Secretary Assistant Secretary (Tech.) Administrative Officer 29 The Delhi Urban Art Commission is an autonomous body set up by an Act of Parliament in 1973 to advise the Government of India in the matter of preserving, developing and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design within Delhi, and to provide advice and guidance to any local body in respect of any project of building operations or engineering operations or any development proposal which affects or is likely to affect the skyline or the aesthetic quality of the surroundings or any public amenity provided therein. Annual Report 2011-12 30 Contents Page Nos. 1. Cityscape 31-33 2. City Level Projects 34-36 3. Guidelines for individual proposals 37-39 4. Significant Projects 40-42 5. Administration and Organization 43-45 6. Annexure-I 46-47 7. Annexure-II 48-56 8. Annexure-III 57-64 Acknowledgement 65 Annual Report 2011-12 31 Cityscape Delhi, a multi-layered City has been witnessing unprecedented growth over the past decade on account of the metro network, the recent Commonwealth Games and being the capital city of an economically progressive country. The City has over a period of time developed quality infrastructure at the same time respecting its heritage and continues to remain one of the most attractive cities of the World. With no other city in the Country being of comparable standards and being an economic hub of the country the city has high level of population influx which has resulted in mushrooming of slums and unauthorized colonies, mounting pressure on its overburdened civic system,. Needless to say that the growth of the city needs to be channelized in a careful manner to avoid uncontrolled and haphazard development. The current economic slow down provides an opportunity to consolidate our gains and learn from our mistakes. As such, the Commission has been sceptical of those proposals which were out of sync with the overall urban form and were defeating the very objective for which they had been proposed. For instance, despite large number of fly-over proposals in the City, the traffic scenario continues to be far from satisfactory. Consequently, the Commission has been emphasizing that mega projects should not be considered in isolation but in the context of an overall perspective. The Delhi Urban Art Commission was set up by an Act of Parliament with a view to advise the Central Govt. in the matter of preserving, developing and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design within Delhi and to provide advice and guidance to any local body in respect of any project of building operation or engineering operations or any development proposals which affects or is likely to affect the sky-line or the aesthetic quality of surroundings or any public amenity provided therein. The Act came into force with effect from May 1, 1974. One of the important functions of the Delhi Urban Art Commission in terms of its mandate is ‘to promote and secure the development/redevelopment or beautification of any area in Delhi in respect of which no proposal in that behalf has been received from any local body’. The Commission was reconstituted in June 2011. One of the very first steps by the Commission on assuming office was to hold series of meetings with its advisors, architect community, heads of Public Sector Undertakings and a cross-section Annual Report 2011-12 32 of other experts to chalk out its agenda for the future. Based on the deliberation at these meetings the Commission sent a proposal to the Government for taking up key city level issues on which the Commission felt that it can make valuable contribution. Further details in this regard are contained in a separate chapter. With a view to streamline the system internally the Commission made an indepth introspection of the existing system and after detailed review it formulated a set of criteria which play a significant role related to aesthetics of a public building. The Commission decided to obtain an undertaking from the owner and architect of the public buildings while referring proposals to the Commission that they would meet these criteria. Once such an undertaking is received, it requires minimal examination on the part of the Commission and would thereby expedite approvals of such buildings. The Commission has incorporated these criteria in its proforma required to accompany project proposals. The concerned local authorities have also been informed about the revised procedure. The streamlining of the procedure helped in significant reduction in the consideration time in respect of proposals referred to the Commission. Another area where the Commission felt that needs to be given due attention is acknowledging the contribution of architect, engineer and owner of existing and proposed public buildings. The Commission felt that all existing public buildings need to be maintained properly with due respect and intent of the original architect who designed it. Accordingly, the Commission decided to take up with all concerned that in case any changes are desired on the external façade by the owner and the architect is alive it should be done with his consent and approval. In case the architect is not alive, the changes need to be done in a sensitive manner with respect to the original design. To acknowledge the contribution of professionals engaged in public buildings, it was also decided that a plaque indicating the name of the architect, engineer, builder etc at a suitable location in all existing and proposed projects should be installed. On the basis of its decision, the Commission has written to authorities of all important public buildings in Delhi for compliance on the above aspects. In terms of the present guidelines of the Central Vigilance Commission and the Government of India selection of architects is being done on the basis of bids. The existing procedure has the possibility of overlooking the talent of the architect and Annual Report 2011-12 33 giving predominance to financial criteria. With a view to secure the best talent for a project the Commission has suggested to Ministry of Urban Development that existing procedure should be modified to provide for architectural competitions in respect of public buildings. The Jury of the competition needs to be announced in advance and the Jury should comprise of eminent architects. The architect’s selection on the panel should be based on merit of their professional expertise and not on the basis of annual turnover of their professional income. The fee and the stages of payment to the architect selected on the basis of the competition need to be done in terms of the guidelines laid down by the Council of Architecture. The recommendations of the Commission have also been endorsed by the Council of Architecture. The Commission continued to update its website to reflect the changes taken place during the year and put maximum information in the public domain in terms of the provisions of the Right to Information Act. Its web based technical programme which can be accessed by different stakeholders provides information about status of proposals from the time of submission till its final disposal. The Commission made substantial progress during the last few years in implementation of the provisions of the Official Language Policy of the Government. An inspection by the High level Parliamentary Committee on Official Languages was conducted successfully during the year. Annual Report 2011-12 34 City Level Projects Despite three Master Plans and the presence of a number of local agencies in Delhi, the quality of life in the City is far from satisfactory for most citizens. The Commission feels it is important that planning process need to give due importance to ground realities and plans need to be reviewed periodically taking into cognizance changing dynamics of the City. With this intent, the Commission held a series of deliberations with the local bodies, architect’s community, urban designers, urban planners and other experts. After, in-depth deliberations and on the basis of support received from different cross sections of experts with whom the Commission interacted, the Commission proposes to initiate suo-moto action on the following proposals 1. Site specific design for wards After completion of the exercise for preparation of Master Plan-2021 by the DDA as next step Zonal plan have also been prepared and notified by the DDA in respect of the each zone in Delhi except for Zone-D. The exercise for finalization of Zone-D plan is also in progress. The next step would involve preparation of local area plans or wards plans in respect of each zone. The DUAC is a forum which has expertise for conducting three dimensional studies in respect of these areas. The Commission accordingly proposed to the Govt. for developing ward plans in consultation with the RWA, concerned MLA etc. which shall have site specific design for each ward. 2. Rehabilitation of Unauthorised colonies/Slums in Delhi With the fast economic growth of the country, Delhi has become a hub for trade and commercial activities. This has increased the scope for employment opportunities in the City, leading to large influx of population from different parts of the country. Due to absence of low cost housing large section of the population reside in slums. The number of slums in the city is 2000 plus. The unplanned growth of the slums makes life very difficult for the inhabitants. To name a few problems : - Lack of civic amenities like Water, electricity, drainage etc. - Lack of public toilets. Annual Report 2011-12 35 - Lack of medical facilities. - Absence of garbage disposal system - Absence of proper roads. - Water logging in monsoon. These slums cannot be washed away. There is an urgent need for improving quality of life for the inhabitants of these slums. DUAC propose to take up a study for rehabilitation of ten slums and ten unauthorised colonies. 3. Vision for Delhi Delhi is a dynamic city which has both heritage value and modern architectural and engineering structures. The City also has substantial unauthorised development. The influx of population in Delhi is very high. These are some of the factors which necessitate a review of vision for Delhi so that the future development is not at cost of its heritage. 4. High Rise developments proposals along metro corridors. The development of metro in Delhi has had an unprecedented impact on the Cityscape. It is natural that property development along metro corridors intensifies in due course of time. To ensure that such development takes place in planned manner and not in a haphazard manner the DUAC propose preparation of development plans for high rise development along existing metro corridors in Delhi 5. Rejuvenation of Delhi Gardens Delhi has large number of gardens, however, except few like Lodhi Garden the landscape elements and amenities at these gardens are less than expected. There is, therefore, a need to make these gardens live places for different cross section of the society. The possibility of providing garden restaurants, museums, amphitheatre, public amenities etc. could be envisaged. While provisions exist in MPD-2021 on providing such amenities each garden's requirements/needs to be reviewed on a case-to-case basis. The Commission proposes to take up study of ten gardens under the DDA and ten gardens under the CPWD . Annual Report 2011-12 36 6. Preparation of design and prototype for high-tech public toilets The Commission has observed the deplorable condition of public toilets in Delhi. It is estimated that there are above 25 lakh women in Delhi who go for their necessary functions before dawn every morning in the open fields. The Commission considers this an unfortunate state of affairs. It is estimated that about 5 lakh toilets need to be provided near basti's and slum areas and also along areas where there are large number of persons who require such facilities. However, to start with 200 public toilets could be put up in different areas. Our aim is self cleaning high-tech toilet which requires minimum maintenance and which would be industrially prefabricated. The design manufacture would be through an open competition in which architects, industrial designers can compete to produce a proto-type design with the help of the industry which will be inspected, approved and installed by the DUAC. The competition would be held in two stages :- Stage I : Four approved designs with drawings & models Stage II : Four proto-type manufactured by the industrial unites based on approved designs 7. Unified Building bye-laws for Delhi One of the primary assignments undertaken by the reconstituted Commission is simplification of existing Building Bye-laws of Delhi with the intent to make them user-friendly, clear cut and work towards a single window system. In this direction, the Commission constituted a Committee of experts who are working in consultation with the local authorities. Based on the check list requested from concerned bodies in the next phase, it is proposed to develop a software which would enable a project proponent to know the approvals from different agencies that would be required for his project and the criteria that he would require to fulfill for obtaining approval for his project. Annual Report 2011-12 37 Guidelines for individual proposals Master Plan for Delhi-2021 envisages major initiatives for proper development of the city in consonance with the requisites of modern living and acceptable environmental parameters. In the light of this, it envisages that this would lead to large scale development/ redevelopment activity the role of DUAC therefore becomes all the more relevant to evaluate things in an overall perspective and act as a watchdog to ensure that the development/redevelopment of the capital city is taking place in a proper manner. The Commission has an advisory role to the Central Government and local bodies in Delhi in terms of its mandate has taken proactive initiative in pursuing the national mission on sustainable habitat. The Commission during the course of introspection of its existing system felt that there are certain common aspects pertaining to all proposals which ensures aesthetics of a public buidling at minimal maintenance in the long run. As such, if such aspects are taken care of in respect of public buidlings it would facilitate and expedite consideration of a proposal. With a view to reduce the consideration time on individual proposals received, the Commission after detailed deliberation revised the proforma which is to accompany proposals and which is signed by the owner and the architect of the proposed building. The proforma now includes an undertaking to be given by the owner and architect on the criteria mentioned hereunder. The permanent finishing material like stone, bricks, glass, ceramic tiles, concrete with silicon finish, metal panel, aggregate finish shall be provided in the external facade elevation of the building and cleaning arrangement will be planned and provided (this is required in case of a building of 4 storey or higher); All coolers, air conditioners, pipes and ducts shall be hidden / concealed and not surface mounted / hung on the façade; Overhead water tanks, mumties and services on the roof shall be integrated as part of architectural elements; Annual Report 2011-12 38 Proper signage shall be provided which shall be prominently displayed near entrance gate for easy access as an important feature of the complex; Glass of quality to ensure that unwanted summer heat and glare does not disturb interiors only will be used and the building will be energy efficient and glass on west and south side will be high performance / have shading device; Solid boundary wall shall not be more than 4 feet high from ground level and beyond 4 feet it shall be transparent with steel grills or any other transparent material; (not applicable for building where there is high security requirements as per approval of the competent authority). Wherever applicable green spaces for community use shall be well maintained. Plaque will be put up in the building premises at a prominent location indicating name of architect, engineer and builder; In case of any changes proposed to the external façade consent of the original architect who designed the building will be obtained and incase the architect is not alive, the changes will be done in sensitive manner with respect to the original design; Minimum 1% of project cost will be spent on works of art in the building complex. (this is required only for public buildings). Once an undertaking is received from the project proponent that the aforesaid aspects will be ensured the consideration time by the Commission gets substantially reduced. The Commission encourages promoters/architects to approach it directly for conceptual approval. While the proposals are routed through the local body in terms of the DUAC Act, conceptual approval helps in saving time and energy at latter stage. An important area where the Commission continued to play an active role is encouraging art in public places. The guidelines issued by the Government exists since 1972 for earmarking 2% of the project cost on art work. However, hardly any creative work in the light of above guidelines have come to the fore. On account of unsatisfactory quality of art work, the Commission organized a workshop few years back on “Public Art and Commonwealth Games Projects”. On the basis of deliberations at the workshops detailed guidelines relating to public art have been issued which could be perused at Annexure-I. An area where the Commission has always given special attention is ensuring that the provisions for Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunity, Protection and Right and Full Participation) Act, 1995 are implemented in both later and spirit. The Annual Report 2011-12 39 Commission believes that design aspect plays a vital role in enabling accessibility to a building by differently- abled persons. Annual Report 2011-12 40 Significant Projects Metro Phase-III Metro is the most significant intervention on the cityscape impacting it both aesthetically and functionally. The primary concern of the Commission while considering metro proposals was coordination of the stations and related movements with the surrounding city fabric. Metro has now initiated action on the Phase-III routes which covers 123 kms. The DMRC made a presentation on metro phase-III proposals before the Commission. The Commission while lauding the work done by the DMRC emphasized the need for having the Metro underground in densely populated areas and areas where aesthetics of the area was at stake . The proposal of Metro Phase-III was generally found acceptable with the following recommendations:1. The Commission strongly felt that in certain sensitive areas namely the Nizamuddin area and New Moti Bagh area, the Metro should be underground rather than elevated. 2. The underground line should be preferably under the area where there are no structures above and the alignment should take into consideration the ground situation. 3. So as to understand the impact of the proposals, there was need to develop visual walk throughs/simulations in sensitive areas. The Commission requested DMRC to submit details/information about the proposal so that it could understand and appreciate the proposals, in context of the ground situation in spatial context. 4. The design of the station should incorporate the urban landscape and urban design aspects. It was suggested that the design of stations should be finalised by inviting the best talent for doing this job, on the basis of open competition. Comprehensive development of Outer Rind Road and Ring Road Corridors in North Delhi While considering traffic and transport proposals the Commission invariably associates experts from the field of traffic and transport, urban designers etc. The important proposals considered during the year were :Annual Report 2011-12 41 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Comprehensive development of Elevated Corridor (Outer Ring Road) between Vikaspuri & Meera Bagh. Comprehensive development of Corridor (Outer Ring Road) between Mangolpuri and Madhuban Chowk. Comprehensive development of Corridor (Outer Ring Road) between Madhuban Chowk and Mukarba Chowk. Comprehensive Development of Corridor NH-1/Road no.50 between Mukarba Chowk to Wazirabad Chowk. Comprehensive development of Corridor on Ring Road between Azadpur and Prembari Pul. In general, the Commission, in respect of such proposals has been of the view that there is a need to have an integrated plan for the proposed traffic movement in the National Capital Territory of Delhi wherein the corridors which need development may be formally identified. In recent years there has been a tendency to implement elevated roads as piecemeal solution in numerous parts of the City. The elevated carriageway needs to be understood with regard to their physical and visual impact on the built up areas through which they pass as well as their impact on the connected networks. Redevelopment of ISBT, Sarai Kale Khan The proposal for redevelopment of Inter State Bus Terminus at Sarai Kale Khan gained importance on account of the site being in the vicinity of a protected monument namely, Humanyun’s Tomb and falling in a low laying area adjacent to the river Yamuna. On account of this, the Commission considered the proposal in depth. The Commission recommended that : 1. The multi storeyed building block as proposed was not acceptable. The buildings should not be more than 2-3 floors high and the development should be low-rise. 2. Since no proposals on the adjacent site of hotel was shown the Commission observed that the basic controlling parameters particularly height should be prescribed in context of the suggested low rise development proposal for ISBT. The hotel should also be a low rise development. EWS Housing Scheme In view of the high level of influx of population into the capital city for economic reasons a need for affordable housing has been felt for quite some time to cater to a significant Annual Report 2011-12 42 section of the city’s population. The EWS housing proposals that received were therefore welcome. The following proposals were considered by the Commission during the year :1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-1, Sector-34, Rohini. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-3 Sector-34, Rohini. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Pocket-III, SectorG8, Narela. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Pocket-II, SectorG2-G6, Narela. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-6A, Sector-35, Rohini. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-4A, Sector-34, Rohini. Plans in respect of 18600 EWS Houses on Prefab Technology at Site-2, Sector-34, Rohini. The main recommendations of the Commission on the proposal were as follows : 1. To improve the open space system inside, the blocks on outer periphery to be made parallel to the outside green. 2. The elevations need to be improved. 3. The system of garbage disposal be shown in plans. 4. The water tanks should not be placed on outer edge at terrace level and placed in such a manner so that these are not visible from the street. 5. The location of the staircase in blocks should be towards the open green. 6. Explore the possibility of shifting central green to a better location so that more residents could use it. 7. The community centre blocks could be brought closer to the green. 8. The ESS block need to be re-located and placed nearer to the road. Annual Report 2011-12 43 Administration and Organization In terms of its mandate the Commission is required to meet atleast twice a month. The Commission met 24 times during the year 2011-12. While proposals received complete in all respects were considered on first come first served basis, important projects were considered on priority. The number of proposals received during the year is listed at Annexure-II. The break-up of these proposals as on 31.3.2012 is as follows:1. 2. 3. 4. Proposals approved Proposals considered and on which observations given Proposals on which material pending Proposals considered and returned/rejected/deferred Total 187 19 00 02 ................ 208 DUAC is a non-commercial, non-earning body which functions in public interest free of cost to the beneficiaries. The Commission does not have any revenue generation of its own. The entire financial requirement is non-plan in nature and is met by grant-inaid from the Central Government. For the year 2011-12 the Budget outlay (BE) of DUAC as approved by the Government was Rs.230.00 lakhs and Revised Estimated (RE) was Rs.280.00 lakhs. The grant received from the Government was Rs.280.00 lakhs. Against this the expenditure during the year was Rs.271.00 lakhs and balance carried over to the next financial year for payment of salary for the month of March 2012 during first week of April 2012 and of the administrative expenses during April 2012. The first instalment of grant-in-aid is received only towards the end of April each year. Official Language Policy of the Govt. An inspection by the high level Parliamentary Committee on Official Language on compliance of the provisions of the Official Language Act by the Commission in its dayto-day functioning was conducted in September 2011. Active steps have been taken for implementation of the recommendations of the Committee and implementation report sent to the Ministry on all recommendations. With a view to increase the use of Hindi Annual Report 2011-12 44 for official work quarterly Karyashalas (Workshops) were arranged during the year. Besides the officers/employees of the Commission attended Karyashalas arranged by other organisations. Vigilance Activities The Secretary of the Commission functions as its Chief Vigilance Officer. In its day-to-day functioning the Commission takes due care to observe the provisions of the vigilance manuals and other guidelines pertaining to purchases etc. brought out by the Central Vigilance Commission. To bring about transparency in its functioning the Commission has been uploading the minutes of its meetings on the DUAC website. Further, to facilitate the stakeholders they can now view the status on their proposal on the DUAC website (www.duac.org) from the date of reference to final disposal. The stakeholders can also observe the status of their proposal vis-à-vis other proposals referred to the Commission. During the year 2011-12 no case of corruption or any other vigilance matter was registered. In terms of the guidelines prescribed by the Government, the Commission organized a Vigilance Awareness Week in the month of November 2011. The week started with the Pledge administered by the Chief Vigilance Officer to the other officers and staff of the Commission. Banners and posters on vigilance awareness were displayed, lectures organized on conduct rules and vigilance awareness in general. Redressal of Public Grievances The Commission has minimal direct dealing with the public. It receives very few grievances/complaints from the public. However, Commission has already appointed its Secretary as Nodal Officer for receiving the complaints from the public and acknowledge the same within 48 hours. For redressal and final decision in respect of any particular complaint, the same is placed before the Commission at its next meeting from the date of receipt by the Nodal Officer. The Commission’s decision in response to the complaint is conveyed within a fortnight. Annual Report 2011-12 45 Citizen’s Charter The Citizen’s Charter of DUAC is available on its website (www.duac.org). It contains information as required to be displayed in terms of the Right to Information Act. In terms of guidelines of the Prime Minister’s Office to implement good governance model in Government organizations a self-assessment was carried out by the Commission. The proposal was accepted by the Ministry of Urban Development. The results of the self-assessment are contained at Annexure-III. Right to Information The Administrative Officer has been designated as the Central Public Information Officer of the Commission. He is assisted by an Assistant Central Public Information Officer. Secretary of the Commission also acts as the First Appellate Authority for the purpose of RTI Act. During the year 2011-12 the Commission received 45 RTI applications. Of these replies were sent in all cases. There was no case for first and second appeal. The Secretariat of the Commission has a total strength of 30 officials headed by Secretary and assisted by the Assistant Secretary (Tech.) and the Administrative Officer for day-to-day functioning. The Secretariat of the Commission has also been entrusted with the added responsibility of functioning as the Secretariat of the Heritage Conservation Committee which is headed by the Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India and the Secretary DUAC is the MemberSecretary of the Committee. No new posts were created during the year nor any fresh appointment made for the functioning of HCC. The Results Framework Document of DUAC for the year 2011-12 was prepared and finalised in terms of guidelines issued by the Government. Anti-Terrorism Day was observed on 21.5.2011 and Sadbhavna Diwas on 19.11.2011. Annual Report 2011-12 46 Annexure-I No. 1(2)82-DUAC March 11, 2011 Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.5 MEMORANDUM Sub: Use of Traditional building crafts in buildings as Work of Art. The Central Government in 1972 through the then Ministry of Works and Housing Memorandum No.18012(23)-W1 dated 5th June 1972 issued guidelines in terms of which every public project should earmark atleast 1% of the project cost for the work of art in public buildings. Unfortunately these orders, except in the case of a few prestigious buildings, have largely not been acted upon. Often it is observed that the work of art is added to a building project as an afterthought. In many cases there is lack of clarity on the nature of work of art. Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, Not Bold Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, Not Bold The Delhi Urban Art Commission has from time to time emphasized that the work of art in public projects needs to be an integral part of the project and could include the following :1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Outdoor sculptures Murals and frescos Mobiles and bas-relief Folk and Tribal Art Artisan craft Indoor sculptures Other art forms relevant to the habitat Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.38", Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: sing Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 3, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligne at: 0.25" + Tab after: 0.75" + Indent at: 0.75", Tab stops: Not at 0.75" Formatted: Bullets and Numbering The Commission at its meeting held on 09.03.2011 has further resolved that building elements created using traditional building craft techniques, using traditional materials and tools and used as an integral part of the building will be considered as 'art work' required to be included in public buildings. This can include hand carved stone elements, hand carved wood, terracotta, decorative wrought iron, amongst other traditional materials. Each region of India has traditional building crafts and this step is taken to encourage this craftsmanship in construction of new buildings and encourage the sensitive use of traditional materials. It may be ensured that the work of art is conceptualized at the time of formulation of the project itself and be brought to the Commission so that it can be completed alongwith the building project. The Commission while considering cases for grant of NOC for completion certificates entertains applications for the same only if these are accompanied with photographs of the works of art in place. Each project of work of art will be assessed separately on a case to case basis by the Commission. ..............2............. Annual Report 2011-12 47 Formatted: Normal, Justified, Indent: First line: 0.5", Tab stops: Not at 5" Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, Not Bold, Not Italic Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, Not Bold, Not Italic Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 pt, Not Bold, Not Italic Formatted: Normal, Right, Indent: First line 0.5", Tab stops: Not at 5" Formatted: Normal, Justified, Indent: First line: 0.5", Tab stops: Not at 5" -2- The local bodies and other local authorities while sending proposals to the Commission are requested to ensure that the amount spent by the project proponent on the work of art is in terms of the aforesaid guidelines of the Government. Formatted: No Spacing, Tab stops: Not at 5" Sd/(¶ãÌã¶ããè¦ã ‡ã슽ããÀ) ÔããäÞãÌã 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 18. 19. 20. 21. The Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. The Additional Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. The Joint Secretary (DL), Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. The Director (DD), Ministry of Urban Development, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, Delhi Sectt., I.P. Estate, New Delhi. The Chief Town Planner, TCPO, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. The Director General, CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. Additional Director General (Arch.), CPWD, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. Engineer-in-Chief, PWD (GNCTD), MSO Bldg., I.P. Estate, New Delhi. Vice-Chairman, DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi. The Commissioner, MCD, Town Hall, Delhi. The Chairperson, NDMC, Palika Kendra, New Delhi. Commissioner (Plng.), DDA, Vikas Minar, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. Chief Town Planner, MCD, Nigam Bhawan, Kashmere Gate, Delhi. Executive Engineer (Bldg.), HQ, MCD, Town Hall, Delhi. The Director (Bldg.), DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi. The Chief Architect, NDMC, Palika Kendra, New Delhi. The Chief Architect, DDA, Vikas Minar, I.P. Estate, New Delhi. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, DMRC, Metro Bhawan, Fire Brigade Lane, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. The Chief Engineer, DTTDC, 10th floor, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi. The Additional Commissioner (Land & Bldg.), Delhi Police, Police HQ, MSO Bldg., I.P. Estate, New Delhi. The General Manager (Arch.), Airport Authority of India, Operational Offices, Gurgaon Road, Delhi-37. Copy to: 1. Chairman, DUAC 2. Members, DUAC 3. Notice Board 4. Website 5. AS(T)/AO 6. All concerned in the office. Annual Report 2011-12 48 Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 p Not Bold, Not Italic Formatted: Font: (Default) +Body (Calibri), 11 p Annexure-II LIST OF PROPOSALS Approved 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 63, SUNDER NAGAR PLANS IN R/O BOUNDARY WALL FOR SOUTH BLOCK, DALHOUSIE ROAD BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 45, SUNDER NAGAR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O ROOPVILLA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 2, SECTOR-19B, DWARKA BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION & STAFF QUARTERS AT KHAJURI KHAS DEMOLITION/RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O RAJASWA BHAWAN - NATIONAL TAX HEAD QUARTER AT KASTURBA GANDHI MARG BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENCE ON HOUSE NO. 4579/15 AT DARYA GANJ. REVISED LAYOUT PLAN FOR GURU GOVIND SINGH GOVT. HOSPITAL AT RAGHUBIR NAGAR PLANS FOR WCDMA TOWER AT 412, AIR FORCE STATION, RACE COURSE. BUILDING PLANS IN R/O BHARTI COLLEGE AT C-4, JANAKPURI ADDITION/ALTERATIONS IN R/O SPECIAL WARD BLOCK , 5TH AND 6TH BLOCK, SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL, RAJENDER NAGAR BUILDING PLANS IN R/O FILLING-CUM-SERVICE STATION FOR IOCL AT POOTH KHURD ADDITION/ALTERATIONS OF EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING OF THE SADHU VASWANI INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL FOR GIRLS AT SHANTI NIKETAN BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INTEGRATED OFFICE COMPLEX FOR ISRO AT PLOT NO. 7, PLANNING AREA CENTRE, SADIQ NAGAR REVISED PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 5 MAN SINGH ROAD LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O HOTEL AT PLOT NO. A-2, COMMUNITY CENTRE,ROAD NO. 43, PITAMPURA LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O HOTEL AT PLOT NO. A-1, COMMUNITY CENTRE,ROAD NO. 43, PITAMPURA PLANS IN R/O P.C. TEACHING BLOCK AT AIIMS, ANSARI NAGAR LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMUNITY CENTRE AT PLOT NO. A, BLOCK-A, VIKAS PURI. PLANS FOR UNDERGROUND CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN EXISTING SUPREME COURT & PROPOSED ADDITIONAL OFFICE COMPLEX AT MATHURA ROAD BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 8B RAJPUR ROAD, CIVIL LINES ADDITION/ALTERATIONS OF BUILDING PLANS IN R/O TESTING & DEVELOPING LAB & OFFICE FOR IIP, NORTHERN REGION OF PLOT NO. 21, FIE PATPARGANJ DEMOLITION/RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O 16, KAUTILYA MARG BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIALGROUP HOUSING NEAR SUBHASH NAGAR METRO STATION, SUBHASH NAGAR PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOUSING NEAR SUBHASH NAGAR METRO STATION, SUBHASH NAGAR LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O GLOBAL MALL, PITAMPURA BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 80, SUNDER NAGAR Annual Report 2011-12 49 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 PLANS IN R/O ELECTRIC SUB STATION AT CANNING LANE PLANS IN R/O ELECTRIC SUB STATION AT RAJINDER PRASAD LANE REVISED PLANS IN R/O EXTENSION OF PARLIAMENT HOUSE ANNEXE PLANS IN R/O BOUNDARY WALL FOR PARLIAMENT HOUSE ANNEXE, SANSAD MARG PLANS FOR LUXURY HOTEL AT ASSET NO. 3, DELHI AEROCITY, INDIRA GANDHI INT. AIRPORT. LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTILEVEL CAR PARKING WITH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT ROHINI METRO STATION WEST LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL CAR PARKING WITH COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT RAJOURI GARDEN ADD./ALT. IN R/O I.P. BUS DEPOT AT I.P. ESTATE,ITO LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION-CUM-DCP OFFICE AT DABRI LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL & MULTI LEVEL PARKING AT PLOT NO. P-2,NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, DISTT. CENTRE WAzIRPUR. BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION & STAFF QUARTERS AT JYOTI NAGAR, SHAHDARA LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL PARKING WITH COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AT METRO STATION, JANAKPURI WEST BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 4578/15, AGGARWAL ROAD, DARYA GANJ REVISED ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O SWEDEN EMBASSY, 4-5, NYAYA MARG, CHANAKYA PURI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O KABIR SR. SEC. SCHOOL AT POCKET-B-5,SECTOR-3, ROHINI LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE POST ON PLOT NO. 4, POCKET-4, BINDAPUR, DWARKA BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SR. SEC. SCHOOL FOR MONTFORT AT ASHOK VIHAR PH.I LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SHUBH LAXMI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 13-B, SECTOR-6, DWARKA PLANS IN R/O HOSTEL BLOCK 1,2,3 AND DINNING BLOCK FOR ATTENDANTS OF PATIENTS AT AIIMS, ANSARI NAGAR BUILDING PLANS IN R/O REFURBISHMENT & EXTENSION OF ESIC HOSPITAL AT BASAI DARAPUR ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O BUNGALOW NO. 4, KUSHAK ROAD LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DIN CGHS AT PLOT NO. 3, SECTOR-4, DWARKA DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O PLOT NO. 8, AMRITA SHERGILL MARG REVISED LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SARAI BUILDING FOR HELP SOCIETY AT SERVICE CENTRE NO.11, VILLAGE DALLUPURA PLANS FOR FLATTED FACTORY BUILDING AT PLOT NO. F-79-80 IN OKHLA INDUSTRIAL AREA PH-1 ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O EXTENSION TO PRESIDENT ESTATE AUDITORIUM IN SCHEDULE 'B', PRESIDENT'S ESTATE, RASHTRAPATI BHAWAN LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION AT 'C' BLOCK, JANAKPURI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O ESIC DISPENSARY & HEALTH CENTRE AT NARELA PLANS FOR DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O 31, BABAR ROAD BUILDING PLANS IN R/O KRISHNA TEMPLE BUILDING FOR ISKCON AT PLOT NO. Annual Report 2011-12 50 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 3, SECTOR-25, ROHINI PHASE-III LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION CUM STAFF QTRS.AT SECTOR-16C, DWARKA LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RAM LAL ANAND COLLEGE AT PLOT NO. 5, DHAULA KUAN REVISED LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATIONS AND STAFF QUARTERS AT NEW ASHOK NAGAR. ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O ST. THOMAS SCHOOL AT MANDIR MARG DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O 54, GOLF LINK COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O TYPE-VII BUNGALOW AT 30 GURUDWARA RAKAB GANJ ROAD REVISED PLANS IN R/O COMMUNITY FACILITY AT REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH (EAST) LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT PLOT NO. 40, BLOCK-A, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PASCHIM PURI. PLANS IN R/O UNDERGROUND PARKING AT ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AIIMS REVISED LAYOUT PLAN FOR KASTURBA BALIKA VIDHYALAYA SR. SEC. SCHOOL, HARIJAN SEVAK SANGH, ISHWAR NAGAR BUILDING PLANS IN R/O EXAMINATION BUILDING AT UNIVERSITY OF DELHI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTISTOREYED STAFF HOUSING FOR IGIB AT MATHURA ROAD CAMPUS ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O JESUS & MARY COLLEGE, CHANAKYA PURI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT AT ROHINI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MAHARISHI BALMIKI HOSPITAL AT POOTH KHURD BUILDING PLANS IN R/O REFURBISHMENT AND EXTENSION OF ESIC HOSPITAL AT BASAI DARAPUR. REVISED PLANS IN R/O 40, AMRITA SHERGILL MARG LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DAP LINES & RESIDENCES, SECTOR-9 DWARKA DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O BRITISH SCHOOL SOCIETY, CHANAKYA PURI ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O JUDGES CHAMBERS AT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O. SERVICE APARTMENT PLOT NO. 4B, MAYUR VIHAR DISTRICT CENTRE. LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SANMATI CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 19A, SECTOR-6, DWARKA LAYOUT AND BUILDING PLANS IN R/O APNI CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 5B, SECTOR11, DWARKA PHASE-I PLANS IN R/O REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH(EAST) TYPE-VIII BUNGLOW NO. 1 TO 14 LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MAHARISHI DAYANAND CGHS LTD., PLOT NO. B-4, VASANT KUNJ. ADDITION/ALTERATION OF SHRI GANINATH CGHS AT PLOT NO.1, SECTOR-5, DWARKA ADDITION/ALTERATION FOR ISPAT CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 29, SECTOR-4, DWARKA LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SHAMAN VIHAR CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 9, SECTOR-23, DWARKA, PHASE-I Annual Report 2011-12 51 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 AICTE HEAD QUARTERS BUILDING AT JNU CAMPUS PROPOSED BUILDING PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND FLATTED FACTORY COMPLEX AT PLOT NO. 15, SWANTANTRA BHARAT MILLS (SBM) COMPLEX SHIVAJI MARG LAYOUT PLAN OF NATIONAL AGRICULTURE SCIENCE CENTRE (NASC), IARI, PUSA CAMPUS LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O GULISTAN CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 1B, SECTOR-13, DWARKA REVISED PLANS IN RESPECT OF IMD COMPLEX AT LODHI ROAD LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O NANDA DEVI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 19. SECTOR-10, DWARKA DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O 4 BHAGWAN DAS ROAD BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE FOR SOCIALIST EDUCATION AT PLOT NO.L 9/1, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, ARUNA ASAF ALI MARG. DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION IN R/O 119, GOLF LINK REVISED PLANS IN R/O LITTLE THEATRE GROUP AT COPERNICUS MARG POLICE HOUSING SECTOR 19 PH 1 DWARKA PLANS IN R/O BUNGALOW NO 1 AT 7 MOTI LAL NEHRU PLACE PLANS IN R/O BUNGALOW NO 2 AT 7 MOTI LAL NEHRU PLACE ADDITION / ALTERATION IN R/O NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA EXTENSION TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE BUILDING PLOT NO 32 SECTOR 14 DWARKA PHASE 2 PLANS IN R/O 14 SUNEHRI BAGH LBZ AREA PLANS IN R/O 10 SUNEHRI BAGH LBZ AREA REVISED PLANS IN R/O 47 AMRITA SHERGILL MARG PLANS IN R/O P.C. TEACHING BLOCK AT AIIMS, ANSARI NAGAR, NEW DELHI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE STATION & STAFF HOUSING AT GREATER KAILASH-1 LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR LALA SHER SINGH MEMORIAL JEEWAN VIGYAN TRUST SOCIETY AT SECTOR-22. DWARKA BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING FOR NATIONAL TRUST FOR THE HANDICAPPED AT A-2, SPECIAL INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SHAHEED JEET SINGH MARG PLANS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BHARTY REALTY AT ASSET NO. 11 AT HOSPITALITY DISTT. DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PLANS FOR BIRD AIRPORT HOTELS AT ASSET NO. 10, HOSPITALITY DISTRICT, DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DEMOLITION & RECONSTRUCTION OF PLANS IN R/O 17, KAUTILYA MARG PLANS IN R/O ACCOMMODATION FOR ESSENTIAL OPERATIONAL STAFF OF NORTHERN RAILWAY CHANAKYA PURI LAYOUT PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL BUILDING COMPLEXD FOR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AT PRAGATI MAIDAN LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DCP OFFICE & RESIDENTIAL QUARTERS FOR DELHI POLICE AT SECTOR-5, ROHINI BUILDING PLANS FOR RESIDENTIAL AND FLATTED FACTORY COMPLEX, EWS BLOCK NO. 1,2,3,4 & 5 AT SWATANTRA BHARAT MILLS (SBM) COMPLEX, SHIVAJI MARG REVISED LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O VICTORIA GARDEN GROUP HOUSING AT RING ROAD AZADPUR Annual Report 2011-12 52 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O POLICE POST AT ANAND PARBAT BUILDING PLANS IN R/O LABORATORY BLOCK FOR CHEMISTRY DEPTT. AT DELHI UNIVERSITY NORTH CAMPUS COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O QUETTA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 5C, SECTOR-22, DWARKA PLANS IN R/O 18600 EWS HOUSES ON PREFAB TECHNOLOGY AT SITE-4A, SECTOR-34, ROHINI. PLANS IN R/O 18600 EWS HOUSES ON PREFAB TECHNOLOGY AT SITE-6A, SECTOR-35, ROHINI. PLANS IN R/O PRIDE HOTEL AT ASSET NO. 5A, DELHI AEROCITY, DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BHARTI REALITY AT ASSET NO. 8, DELHI AEROCITY, DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O NEW DELHI KALI BARI TEMPLE, MANDIR MARG PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BHARTI REALITY AT ASSET NO. 7, DELHI AEROCITY, DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT REVISED BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 10, JAMUNA ROAD, CIVIL LINES LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE FOR LIVER & BILLIARY SCIENCE HOSPITAL AT SECTOR-D-I & D-II, VASANT KUNJ LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AT SECTOR-9, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O LAXMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AT HAUZ KHAS COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O GROUP HOUSING AT E-BLOCK, GREATER KAILASH1. COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART)& MOTI BAGH(EAST)- TYPE VI, TOWER NO. 8 COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O TYPE VI, TOWER NO. 7, REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH (EAST) COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL AT SECTOR-C, VASANT KUNJ COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O SLEUTHS CGHS AT PLOT NO. 6, SECTOR - 19B, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O FLATTED FACTORY COMPLEX, BLOCK - 4, 15 SHIVAJI MARG COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O REDEVELOPMENT OF GPRA (A) TYPE-II HOUSING (300 NOS.) (B)11 KV ESS AT ALIGANJ JOR BAGH COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENCE AT 15, CENTRAL LANE, BENGALI MARKET COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENCE AT 3, TILAK MARG COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O BALAJI MEDICAL & DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH CENTRE AT PLOT NO. 8, I.P. EXT., SHAHDARA. COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT 196, GOLF LINKS COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O GIRLS SR. SEC. SCHOOL FOR HELEN JERWOOD MEMORIAL EDU. SOCIETY AT PLOT NO. 4A, NORTH END, MODEL TOWN III. COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. 195, GOLF LINK COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O FAKRUDDIN MEMORIAL CGHS AT PLOT NO. 18, SECTOR 10, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MAHAGUN HOTEL AT PLOT NO. 32, CBD SHAHDARA Annual Report 2011-12 53 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O VIDYUT CGHS AT PLOT NO. 2, SECTOR-22, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O NEW RAJPUT CGHS AT PLOT NO. 23, SECTOR-12, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O TYPE-IV MULTI-STOREYED TOWER-9, REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR(PART)& MOTI BAGH (EAST) COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O ESS NO. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 &10, REDEVELOPMENT OF NETAJI NAGAR (PART) & MOTI BAGH (EAST) COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O THE UPKARI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 9, SECTOR-12, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. D-9, DISTT. CENTRE NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, WAZIRPUR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MAHAJAN SHREE CGHS AT PLOT NO. 13, SECTOR23, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O DHARAM CGHS AT PLOT NO. 18, SECTOR-18, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT PLOT NO. 8, MANGLAM PLACE, SECTOR-3, ROHINI COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O VVIP GUEST HOUSE FOR GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL AT 2 CIRCULAR ROAD, CHANAKYAPURI. COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O FOREIGN SERVICE TRAINING INSTITUTE AT OLD JNU CAMPUS LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O COMMONWEALTH GAMES VILLAGE NEAR AKSHARDHAM TEMPLE COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O WHITE ROSE CGHS AT PLOT NO.7, SECTOR-13, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O EROS METRO MALL AT PLOT NO. 8, SECTOR-14, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 9 PANCHSHEEL MARG COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL PARKING CUM COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT SAROJINI NAGAR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MULTI LEVEL PARKING-CUM-COMMERCIAL COMPLEX AT BABA KHARAK SINGH MARG COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 2, S.P. MARG COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O S.B. YOUTH CGHS AT PLOT NO. 6B, SECTOR-2, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O INDEPENDENT CORPORATE OFFICE BUILDING FOR INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AT SADIQ NAGAR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O DELHI COMMONWEALTH WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION AT KAILASH COLONY EXTN. ZAMRUDPUR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O JAWAHARLAL NEHRU BHAWAN, 23-D, JANPATH COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O THE DELHI STATE NEWSPAPAER EMPLOYEES FEDERATION CGHS LTD. AT PLOT NO. 1 SECTOR-19, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O JAI MATA KALYANI CGHS AT PLOT NO. 31, SECTOR4, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O SERVICE APARTMENT IIDL PLOT NO. 4A, DISTT. CENTRE MAYUR VIHAR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O B.R. DHAWAN CHARITABLE TRUST HOSPITAL AT SECTOR-12,DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O CHITRAKOOT DHAM CGHS LTD. PLOT NO. 2, SECTOR-2, SECTOR-19, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 54 TODARMAL ROAD Annual Report 2011-12 54 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC FINANCE AND POLICY AT PLOT NO. A-17, SOUTH OF IIT COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 14&16, AURANGZEB ROAD COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/O PROPERTY KNOWN AS CBI HEADQUARTERS ENVELOP-5-B, CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O VEENA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 5D, SECTOR-22, DWARKA COMPLETION OF COMMERCIAL COMPLEX FOR PRESTIGE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. AT PLOT NO 02 ROAD NO 44 PITAMPURA COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/O SADBHAWANA CGHS PLOT NO 11 SECTOR 11 DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O 19 BABAR ROAD COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/O DR. LAL PATHOLOGY LABORATORY SECTOR 18 ROHINI COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O HOTEL BUILDING PLOT NO 3B1 TWIN DISTTRICT CENTRE SECTOR-10 ROHINI COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL CENTRE AT PLOT NO. B-7, NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE, DISTRICT CENTRE WAZIRPUR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O PLOT NO. 3, TEES JANUARY MARG COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O BHAI VEER SINGH SAHITYA SADAN, BHAI VEER SINGH MARG, GOLE MARKET COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT PLOT NO. B-1, NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE,WAZIRPUR DISTT. CENTRE COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O HOTEL BUILDING FOR BRILLIANT BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. AT SHALIMAR BAGH COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O GUEST HOUSE FOR GOVT.OF MADHYA PRADESH AT PLOT NO. 12, IHC POCKET, VASANT VIHAR COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O CHANKYA CGHS AT PLOT NO. 23, SECTOR-4, DWARKA COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O MINISTER'S BUNGALOW AT PLOT NO. 15, SUNEHRI BAGH COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O AMERICAN EMBASSY SCHOOL, CHANDERGUPTA MARG, CHANAKYA PURI COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O BPCL MODERN SERVICE STATION, JANPATH, CONNAUGHT PLACE COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O PEARLS BUSINESS PARK PLOT NO. D-7, DISTRICT CENTRE (NETAJI SUBHASH PLACE) WAZIRPUR Annual Report 2011-12 55 Observations given 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. LAYOUT PLAN IN R/O RAJ KUMARI AMRIT KAUR COLLEGE OF NURSING AT LAJPAT NAGAR LAYOUT PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (GROUP HOUSING)AT VISHWAVIDYALAYA METRO, CIVIL LINES REVISED LAYOUT PLAN OF ESIC HOSPITAL COMPLEX, SECTOR-15, ROHINI COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O INSTITUTE OF INDIAN SYSTEM OF MEDICINES AT VILLAGE KHERA DABUR, NAJAFGARH LAYOUT PLAN OF GOVT. SR. SEC. SCHOOL AT VILLAGE HASTSAL PROPOSED DIABETIC ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC CARE CENTRE AT GTB HOSPITAL SHAHDARA DELHI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O RESIDENTIAL PLOT NO. 1-D, NORTH END ROAD, CIVIL LINES REVISED LAYOUT PLAN OF DEEPAK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AT PLOT NO. 5-6, VIKAS MARG EXTN. KARKARDOOMA PLANS IN R/O 268 EWS HOUSING AT VACANT POCKET BEHIND RAMGARH COLONY, JAHANGIRPURI BUILDING PLANS IN R/O DESHBANDHU COLLEGE, KALKAJI REDEVELOPMENT OF ISBT AT ANAND VIHAR BUILDING PLANS IN R/O OFFICE BUILDING FOR INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION (ISRO) AT SADIQ NAGAR PLANS IN R/O PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK HEADQUARTERS, PLOT NO. 4, SECTOR-10, DWARKA REVISED LAYOUT PLAN FOR GENERAL POOL OFFICE BUILDING, PUSHPA BHAWAN AT PUSHP VIHAR ADDITION/ALTERATION IN R/O HOTEL QUEEN ROAD, 19, ASHOK ROAD BUILDING PLANS IN R/O NARAINA VIHAR CLUB AT NARAINA VIHAR BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MAHARAJA SURAJMAL INSTITUTE AT C-4, JANAKPURI ADDITION/ALTERATION OF PLANS IN R/O SOUTH INDIA CLUB, SOUTH INDIA ASSOCIATION, MANDIR MARG LAYOUT & BUILDING PLANS IN R/O MULTILEVEL PARKING AT PLOT NO. P-1, DISTT. CENTRE WAZIRPUR Annual Report 2011-12 56 Rejected/ returned/deferred 1. COMPLETION PLANS IN R/O HOTEL PROJECT PLOT NO.1A, DISTRICT CENTRE, HARI NAGAR. 2. LAYOUT PLAN FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ON NANGLOI NAJAFGARH ROAD, BAPROLA. Annual Report 2011-12 57 Annexure-III Template for Service Delivery Statement Vision Statement Guidance Text : ‘VISION’ is the long term goal of the Ministry/Department Vision of the Ministry/Department Preserving developing and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design within Delhi. Mission Statement Guidance Text : ‘MISSION’ is the short-term strategy or plan for achieving the vision. Mission for the year (i) (ii) To advise the Central Government in the matter of preserving, developing and maintaining the aesthetic quality of urban and environmental design of Delhi, and To advice the local authorities in respect of any project of building and engineering operation or any development proposal which affects or is likely to affect the aesthetic quality of the surroundings or any public amenity provide therein. Objectives for the year identified by the Ministry/Department Guidance Text : State the objectives identified along with measurable performance targets that have been set for these objectives No. 1. Objectives Measurable Performance Targets a) To bring about value addition on building and engineering proposals on aspects relating to functionality and aesthetics. b) To scrutinize and give statutory decision on proposals referred to the Commission in terms of its mandate. c) Interactions with stakeholders on city level issues. d) Quick redressal of Grievances e) Meeting with statutory obligations (a) No targets can be set as number of proposals referred by local bodies is not known in advance. (b) However, targets are set in respect of macro level exercises. Annual Report 2011-12 58 w.r.t. Parliament. Client Groups and their requirements from the Ministry/ Department Guidance Text : Identify client groups along with their requirements. Client Groups Requirement 1. Local bodies – NDMC, MCD, DDA Advice on proposals referred by them 2. Govt. Department Advice on specific exercise entrusted to the Commission 3. Architect/Promoters Advice on conceptual proposals referred to the Commission by them. Consultation with Stakeholders Guidance Text : Give the details of stakeholders involved/contacted in charter formulation and for arriving at the above stated Objectives/Targets Constitution of Charter Task Force Designation Details of individuals/institutions consulted 1. Department officials Consulted 2. Representative from concerned departments 3. Supplier of Services/Products -- 4. NGOs -- 5. RWAs -- 6. Unions -- 7. Citizens/Representatives -- 8. Any other other -- Various experts Consultation Meetings Conducted/Consultations Carried Out 1. -- -- 2. -- -- Annual Report 2011-12 59 Charter Characteristics and Dissemination Guidance Text : Indicate whether the characteristics given below are present in the charter and method of dissemination utilized (Yes/No) Language Simplicity Adequacy Local Language Tabular Form Time Norms Hindi Simple Language Documents Required English Brief Statements Exceptions Reference to Details Fees/Charges Remedial Measures Any Methods for Dissemination 1. Meetings, Seminars and Conference The Commission organizes meetings in terms of its Conduct of Business Regulations, 1976 for disposal of work allocated in terms of its mandate. It also organizes seminars, workshops/exhibition from time to time on important issues 2. Newspaper advertisements -- 3. Leaflets -- 4. Brochures -- 5. Information printed in documents given to customers -- 6. Public Address System at Citizen interface points -- 7. Any Other -- Means Available for obtaining feedback Guidance Text : Indicate whether the means indicated below are available/used and whether DARPG guidelines regarding these are being followed. No. Means by which Department obtains feedback (Yes/No) DARPG Guidelines (Yes/No/NA) 1. Written Communication handed personally by Yes Annual Report 2011-12 60 clients/citizens 8. 2. Written Communication through Post/Courier Yes 3. Telephone Yes 4. Verbal through Personal Visit Yes 5. Website 6. Workshops/Seminars and Conferences 7. Complaint/Suggestion Boxes -Yes Any aggrieved, individual etc. can approach the Commission or its Secretary and the representation is duly considered. Any other -- Recording and analyzing feedback Guidance Text : Indicate whether there exists a process for classification of feedback and give the results obtained from this process Is there a process for classifying feedback (Yes/No) No Does this process cover the following communication types Communication Type State Yes/No 1. Suggestions - 2. Grievances - 3. Compliments - 4. Queries - After analyzing feedback in each of the above categories, briefly state which are the grievance prone areas requiring process changes/or additional outlays -- Annual Report 2011-12 61 Norms for Grievance Handling Guidance Text : Indicate time norms (if decided) for acknowledgement/redressal and interim/final reply to petitioner Grievance state Time Norm present (Yes/No) Relevant Time Norm Acknowledgement of Grievance 2 days -- Redressal of complaints 15 days -- Interim/Final reply 15 days -- Achievement of Objectives Guidance Text : Mention specific Objective and Performance Target along with the action needed/planned for them Have performance target been achieved for each objective Yes/No State the following for each objective set by the Ministry/Department in the previous year Objective The minutes of the Commission’s meetings are uploaded on its website immediately after the Performance Target meeting. The web based system for tracking the progress of proposals referred to the Commission Actual Performance till the time of its disposal to bring about greater Reasons for not achieving (if actual transparency in the organization has been put in performance doesn’t match/exceed place. performance target) The Annual Report of the Commission indicating the Action Needed/Planned performance during the year is also being uploaded on its website every year. Learning Initiatives based on lessons learnt Guidance Text : Mention specific initiatives undertaken based on learnings above. Initiatives planned for Setting/Improving standards and achieving them 1. File tracking system has been introduced based on the requirements of the stakeholders. Tracking Citizen/Client Satisfaction Annual Report 2011-12 62 Guidance Text : Mention if there is a process to determine stakeholder satisfaction and briefly describe the issues after analysis. Is there a process in place to track Citizen/Client satisfaction Grievience Redressal System is in place. Public If yes, state whether it incorporates the following indicators No. Indicators of Citizen Satisfaction Compiled (Yes/No) 1. Newspaper Reports Yes 2. Inspection Report Comments Yes 3. Senior Officer Visit Comments -- 4. Client Survey Indicators -- 5. Any other -- Briefly state the issues identified by the above process Efficiency and transparency of the organisation. Strengths The Commission comprises a body of eminent experts who act as a watch-dog in respect of the City’s development. Areas requiring improvement The concerns of the Commission include : 1. Maintenance of heritage sites which are under threat due to pressures of development activities. 2. Keeping a check on the green cover of the city and trying to develop a network of green areas in the city. 3. Despite high level of investment on road infrastructure the traffic scenario in Delhi continues to be dismal. This calls for proper traffic management plans and their effective implementation. Any other Significant Issues -- Improving Citizen/Client Focus and satisfaction Guidance Text : Briefly state the measures planned in areas identified from the analysis of stakeholder satisfaction No. Measures for making improvement in above identified areas Annual Report 2011-12 63 -- -- Improving Employee Capabilities Is the required infrastructure available No. Minimum Guidelines Yes/No Infrastructure Last Updation Comment on Date Current Status 1. Adequate Furniture Yes Yes 2. Availability of Toilet/s Yes Yes 3. Availability of Electricity Yes Yes 4. Any other relevant issues State areas that need attention While the working environment of the employees is conducive their service conditions compared to their counterparts in the Central Govt. is poor which has a demoralizing effect on them. The service conditions need to be brought at par with other similar organizations and the Govt. employees to bring out the best output from the employees. Action Planned in the above identified areas Pension Scheme at par with Central Government employees Medical Scheme for retired employees Residential Accomodation Guidance Text : Briefly state the capability building efforts being made in the Ministry/department along with the areas focused and improvements resulted Trainings Details (Duration, Location etc.) -- Focus Area/s Improvement Achieved Computer proficiency Almost all employees are computer literate Counseling Details (Duration, Location etc.) -- Focus Area/s Improvement Achieved -- -- Focus Area/s Improvement Achieved Other Tools Details (Duration, Location etc.) Annual Report 2011-12 64 -- -- -- Minimum Infrastructure Requirement Guidance Text : Briefly state whether required infrastructure is available, whether Ministry/Department has issued guidelines in this regard and indicate areas that need attention along with Action planned in these area. Annual Report 2011-12 65 Acknowledgement The Commission would like to place on record its thanks to its Advisors, Officers of Government Departments, the Delhi Development Authority, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, the New Delhi Municipal Council and practicing architects who have unhesitatingly given their time and assistance to the Commission in the performance of its functions. Annual Report 2011-12 66