IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Influence of the Depth base on the Electrical parameters of a Parallel Vertical Junction Silicon Solar Cell under Polychromatic illumination 1 Oulimata MBALLO, 2Boureima SEIBOU, 3Mamadou WADE, 1Marcel Sitor DIOUF, 3Ibrahima LY, 3 Seni TAMBA, 1Grégoire SISSOKO 1 Faculty of Science and Technology, University Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar-Senegal 2 Ecole des mines de Niamey-Niger 3 Ecole Polytechnique of Thies, EPT, Thies, Senegal ABSTRACT In this paper, influence of the depth in the base on the Electrical parameters of a Parallel Vertical Junction Silicon Solar Cell under Polychromatic illumination. From the excess minority carrier’s density in solar cell, the photocurrent density the photovoltage and the capacitance are determined and studied for various depth in the base. From the I-V characteristic, the series and shunt resistances are determined for different values of the depth in the base. Keywords: parallel vertical junction – depth z – series and shunt resistances. 1. INTRODUCTION The use of photovoltaic energy on a large scale is slowed down by poor efficiency of the solar cells. Indeed the performance of a solar cell is related to its capacitance to collect maximum carriers and thus to limit the recombinations in both in the bulk and the surface. In order to improve the performance of solar cells, a new generation of solar cells called vertical junction solar cell was invented [1]. These solar cells are of two types: vertical junction solar cell series and those parallel vertical junction [1], [2], [3]. For the characterization of solar cells much research have been carried out on the behavior of carriers photocreated in a horizontal solar cell junction [4] and in a vertical junction solar cell [5]. These types solar cell were studied in the presence of an electric field [6], [7], of a magnetic field [8], [9] or under a simultaneous effect of both electric and magnetic field [10]. Our contribution in this article is to carry out a study based on the minority carriers and the electrical parameters according to the depth of a parallel vertical junction silicon solar cell. The advantage of this type of solar cell is the fact that the most important part of our study is based between two junctions through which the carriers migrate to generate current. Thus, after studying the influence of the depth on the minority carriers density, we will study the influence of the depth on the photocurrent, the phototension, the capacitance and on the series and shunt resistances. The behavior of the capacitance of the solar cell in short-circuit versus the depth will let us know the variation of the thickness of the depletion zone and later on the influence of the depth on the performance of the solar cell. 2. THEORY On figure 1 we present a series of photovoltaic cells with vertical junction connected in parallel and on figure 2 a photovoltaic cell to the silicon of the n-p-n type to parallel vertical junction under polychromatic illumination Figure 1 Series of parallel vertical junction photovoltaic cells. Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 6 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Figure 2 Structure of a photovoltaic cell of the type n-p-n to vertical junction under constant polychromatic illumination While being placed on the assumption of the Quasi Neutral Base (QNB) theory’s [11], the continuity equation which the minority carriers in the base under steady state is given by: G (z) D 2 ( x ) R (x) 0 x 2 (1) With G(z) the carriers generation rate to depth Z for the polychromatic illumination and whose expression is given by the equation [12]: 3 G(z) a e b i Z (2) i i 1 where ai et bi are the overall radiation coefficients from the generation rate modelling in solar spectrum to A.M 1,5 [13] : D 2 ( x ) is the term of diffusion where D is the diffusion coefficient of the carriers; R(x) is the x2 recombination rate of the carriers to positon x [14] : R( x) ( x) (3) and (x) is the photo-generated minority carriers density in position X of the base The solution of the equation (1) is given by the equation (4) below x x ( x , z ) Ach ( ) Bsh ( ) L L With Ci a i 3 C e b i Z (4) i i 1 L2 D where L is the diffusion length. Coefficients A and B of the equation (4) are determined by the use of the boundary conditions [13], [15]: At the junction base1-emitter1 (x=0) At the middle of the base (x=H/2) D ( x, z ) x Sf ( x, z ) x 0 (5) x 0 ( x, z ) x 0 x (6) H 2 is the junction recombination velocity. It is equal to the sum of the intrinsic recombination velocity (induced by resistance shunt and depending only on the intrinsic parameters of the photovoltaic cell) and the recombination velocity Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 7 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 which shows the leakage current induced by the external load and which defines the operating point of the photovoltaic cell. [16], [17]. To study the effect of depth on the parameters of the solar cell, we will work with a z depth between 20 and 50 microns. Indeed for a good characterization of the solar cell it is important to have a low value of the series resistance whose effect is reflected on the form factor and a large value of the photocurrent density [18, 19]. But the increase of the depth z increases the series resistance and a decrease in the photocurrent. Hence the importance of working with low values of the depth z. 2.1. Minority carriers density Figure 3 represents the variation of the minority carriers density in the base versus thickness X for various depth Z. Figure3: minority carriers density versus thickness X of the base for various depth Z (D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01cm) On this figure, we note a symmetry of the various curves of the density at the middle of the base(X = H/2). Indeed our photovoltaic cell model is in parallel vertical junction, therefore the basis of our study is done between two junctions which contribute in the same way. Thus for a given curve, one observes three zones: x < H/2, the gradient of the carriers is positive: the electrons located in this zone cross junction 1 to generate current. x=H/2, the null gradient of the density is corresponding to the maximum of the minority carriers density: carriers cross the two junctions on both sides of the base. x > H/2, the gradient of the carriers is also positive compared to transmitter 2: the electrons located in this zone cross junction 2 to take part in the photocurrent. When the depth increases, the carrier density decreases. This is explained by the fact that it has a low generation of carriers in the depth. The incident light attenuates in-depth involves a reduction in the rate of generation from where reduction in the carriers density. The study of the density of the carriers in the base leads to the photocurrent density generated within the solar cell. 2.2. Photocurrent density The expression of the photocurrent density of a solar cell is given according to the gradient of the minority carriers density by the relation: J ph 2 q D ( x, z ) x (7) x 0 with q the elementary charge. On figure 4 we represent the photocurrent density profile versus the junction recombination velocity for various depth and on figure 5 the photocurrent of short-circuit versus the depth Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 8 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X Figure 4: Photocurrent density versus junction recombinaison velocity for various depth z (D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01 cm) Figure 5: Short circuit photocurrent density versus the depth z (D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01 cm) We note an increase of the photocourant at the figure 4 when the junction recombination velocity increases. In fact, as the matter of fact, the recombination speed to the junction shows the amount of carriers that cross the junctions to be part of the photocurrent. The more it increases, the more carriers are swept towards junctions, thus increasing, the photocurrent density. To low values of the junction recombination velocity, the photocurrent density is almost nonexistent representing the situation of open circuit of the solar cell. The photogenerated carriers are thus blocked to the junction. To high values of the junction recombination velocity, the photocurrent density is maximal and corresponding to photocurrent of the short-circuit. The solar cell operates in situation of short-circuit, where the maximum of carriers cross the junctions to be part of the photocurrent. This figure shows again the decreasing of the photocurrent density of short-circuit when we go in depth, which is illustrated at figure 5. Actually, the incident light intensity decreases in depth. In such case, there is less photo-generated carriers, therefore, the photocurrent density decreases. In the following paragraph, we are going to study the photovoltage, which characterizes the solar cell potential barrier. 2.3. Photovoltage The solar cell photovoltage is given by the relation of Boltzmann: N V ph VT ln 2B (0, z ) 1 n i Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 (8) Page 9 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X With VT is the thermal voltage: NB the base doping density; ni the intrinsic carriers density at thermal equilibrium; k the Boltzmann constant ; T the absolute temperature and q the electron charge. Figures 6 and 7 respectively represent the variation of the photovoltage versus the junction recombination velocity for various values depth and that of the photovoltage versus the depth. Figure 6 : Photovoltage versus junction recombinaison velocity for various depth (D=26 cm2.s-1; L=0,01 cm) Figure 7 : Open circuit photovoltage versus depth z (D=26 cm2.s-1; L=0,01 cm) We notice in the figure 6 that the photovoltage is maximal and equal to the open circuit photovoltage for the low junction recombination velocity (Sf) values then it decreases until tending to an almost null value with the great values of Sf (in the vicinity of the short circuit). In fact for low Sf values, the charge carriers do not acquire a sufficient energy to cross the junction. Thus, these carriers are blocked at the junction increasing the photovoltage consequently. For the great values of the junction recombination velocity, the carriers manage to traverse the junction involving thereafter the considerable fall of the photovoltage. When we advance in the depth, the carriers number decreases. We can notice the reduction in the open circuit photovoltage what confirms figure 7. 2.4. I-V characteristics We study in this paragraph the characteristics I-V of the photovoltaic cell. Figure 8 represents the I-V characteristics for various depth. Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 10 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Figure 8: I-V Characteristics of the photovoltaic cell for various depth z (D=26 cm2.s-1; L=0,01 cm) We notice on this figure that the photocurrent density is maximum with the low values of the photovoltage corresponding to the short circuit photocurrent then it decreases for the great values of the photovoltage corresponding to the open circuit situation of the solar cell. We also notice the reduction in the photocurrent density and the photovoltage with the depth Z. From the I-V characteristics of the solar cell, studies showed that the solar cell behaves like [18], [20]. i) an ideal voltage generator to the neighborhood of the open circuit, ii) an ideal current generator to the neighborhood of the short circuit. In each case, an equivalent electrical model of the solar cell was proposed. Using these electrical model the series and shunt resistances can be determined. 2.4. Series resistance The series resistance characterizes the ohmic and resistive effects of the material and the contact device. It is an important parameter that affects the performance of a solar cell. It is therefore important to determine this parameter to get a reliable characterization of the solar cell. There are several methods for determining the series resistance [18] – [21]. To determine series resistance, we consider the solar cell operation in open circuit. Figure 9 below shows the equivalent diagram of the solar cell in the vicinity of the open circuit [17], [20] where Rs is the series resistance; Rch is the external load and Voc is the open circuit photovoltage. Figure 9: Solar cell equivalent circuit operating in open circuit The literal expression of the series resistance is given by: R S ( Sf ) V OC V J ph ( Sf ) (9) ( Sf ) ph Figures 10 and 11 respectively illustrate the profile of series resistance versus the junction recombination velocity for various depth and the series resistance versus the depth. Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 11 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X Figure 10: Series resistance versus junction recombinaison velocity for various depth (D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01 cm) Figure 11: Series resistance versus depth z (Sf = 2 102 cm/s; D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01 cm) On figure 10 the series resistance is low and almost. Series resistance increases with the depth z (figure 11). Indeed as underlined previously, when the values of Z increases, the carriers generation rate decreases. 2.5. Shunt resistance Shunt resistance characterizes the eddy currents within the solar cell. There are several methods for determining the shunt resistance [20], [21]. To determine shunt resistance, we consider the solar cell operation in short circuit. Thus, the solar cell is regarded like a generator of current in parallel with the shunt resistance Rsh and series whith the external charge Rch whose equivalent electrical model is represented on the figure 12 [15], [ 22]. Figure 12: Solar cell equivalent circuit operating in short circuit Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 12 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 By applying the nodes law, the shunt resistance can be expressed by: R Sh ( Sf ) V ph ( Sf ) J CC J ( Sf ) ph (10) We represent on the figure 13 the shunt resistance versus the junction recombination velocity for various depth Z. In the expression of shunt resistance the currents Jph and Jcc as well as the Vph tension depend on depth Z, therefore we represent on the figure 14 the profile of shunt resistance versus the depth Z Figure 13 : Shunt resistance versus junction recombinaison velocity for various depth z (D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01 cm). Figure 14: Shunt resistance versus depth z (Sf = 8108cm/s; D=26 cm2.s-1 ; L=0,01 cm). At figure 13, we observe a considerable increasing in shunt resistance with the junction recombination velocity because more the movement of the carriers in the base is accelerated, more the eddy current of the solar cell reduces. Besides, we note also the raising in shunt resistance with the depth like illustrates on figure 14. Indeed, when the Z values increases, the incident light intensity decreases involves the reduction in the leakage currents and the increasing of the shunt resistance. 2.6. Capacitance The solar cell capacitance under illumination is given by : C q no (0, z) q VT VT (11) Figure 15 illustrates the profile of the capacitance versus the junction recombination velocity for various depth and figure 16 illustrates the capacitance of solar cell near the short circuit versus the depth. Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 13 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Figure 15 : Capacitance versus junction recombinaison velocity for various depth (D=26 cm2.s-1; L=0,01cm) Figure 16 : capacitance of the solar cell operating in short circuit versus the depth Z (D=26cm2.s-1; L=0,01cm) On these various curves, the capacitance is maximum in the vicinity of the open circuit (0< Sf< 2.102cm/s). This is due to the blocking of the carriers to the junction when the junction recombination velocity is low. On the other hand the capacitance decreases markedly in short-circuit (Sf > 5.105cm/s): almost all the carriers take part to photocurrent generation. In addition, the decrease of the capacitance is noted when the Z values increases. Indeed the space charge region varies with the depth. It's reduces because of the weak generation in depth of the carriers. We notice also on figure 16 that the capacitance of solar cell operating in short circuit decreases with the depth. From this figure we determined the values of capacitance of solar cell operating in short circuit when the depth Z varies to see the influence of the depth on the widening of the space charge region. We obtain the table below. Table 1: values of capacitance of solar cell operating in short circuit when the depth Z varies Depth Z (cm) 10 – 3 2 10 - 3 3 10 - 3 4 10 - 3 5 10-3 Capacitance in short circuit Ccc (F/cm2) 2,337 10-8 1,189 10-8 7,478 10-9 5,461 10-9 4,406 10-9 We notice that the more the depth Z increases, weaker the capacitance of solar cell in short circuit becomes. This reduction of the capacitance of solar cell in short circuit corresponds to a widening of the thickness X of the depletion region which is comparable with a plane capacitor. Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 14 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X 3. CONCLUSION The purpose of this work was to study influence of the depth base on the electrical parameters of a parallel vertical junction solar cell under polychromatic illumination. The study showed that when depth Z increases the minority carriers density as well as the electrical parameters such as the photocurrent density, the photovoltage and the capacitance decrease because of attenuation of the incident ligth. This study showed also that the series and shunt resistances increase when the depth increases. Références [1] Wise J. F., “Vertical junction hardened solar cell,” U.S patent 3690953, 1970. [2] Gover A. and Stella P., “Vertical multijunction solar-cell one dimensional analysis,” IEEE Transactions on electron devices, 21(6), pp. 351-356, 1974. [3] Green M. A., “Silicon solar cells: Advanced principles & practice,” Center for photovoltaic devices and systems university of new south wales, pp. 259-26, 1995. [4] Madougou S., Made F., Boukary M.S. and Sissoko G., “I –V Characteristics For Bifacial Silicon Solar Cell Studied Under a Magnetic Field,” Advanced Materials Research, Vol.18-19, pp. 303-312, 2007. [5] Ngom M.I., Zouma B., Zoungrana M., Thiame M., Bako Z.N., Camara A.G. and Sissoko G., “Theoretical study of a parallel vertical multi-junction silicon cell under multispectral illumination: influence of external magnetic field on the electrical parameters,” International Journal of Advanced Technology & Engineering Research (IJATER), ISSN: 2250-3536, 2(6), pp. 101- 109, 2012. [6] Diouf M.S., I. Gaye, Thiam A., Fall M.F.M., I. Ly and Sissoko G., “Junction recombination Velocity Induced Open Circuit Voltage For a Silicon Solar Cell Under External Electric Field,” Current Trends in Technology and Science, ISSN: 2279- 0535 3(5), pp. 372-375, 2014. [7] Zoungrana M., Dieng B., Lemrabott O.H., Touré F., Moujtaba M.A. Ould El, Sow M.L. and Sissoko G., “External Electric Field Influence on Charge Carriers and Electrical Parameters of Polycrystalline Silicon Solar Cell,” Research Journal of applied sciences, Engineering and technology, 4(17), pp. 2967-2972, 2012. [8] Dieng A., Zerbo I., Wade M., Maiga A. S. and Sissoko G., “Three-dimensional study of a polycrystalline silicon solar cell: the influence of the applied magnetic field on the electrical parameters,” Semiconductor Science and technology, 26(9), pp. 473-476, 2011. [9] Thiam Nd., Diao A., Ndiaye M., Dieng A., Thiam A., Sarr M., Maiga A.S. and Sissoko G., “Electric equivalent models of intrinsic recombination velocities of a bifacial silicon solar cell under frequency modulation and magnetic field effect,” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(22), pp. 4646-4655, 2012. [10] Sow O., Zerbo I., Mbodji S., Ngom M.I., Diouf M.S. and Sissoko G., “Silicon solar cell under electromagnetic waves in steady state: electrical parameters determination using the i-v and p-v characteristics,” International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 1(4), pp. 230 – 246, 2012. [11] Pulfrey, D. L., “Understanding Modern Transistors and Diodes,” Cambridge University Press, 2010. [12] Furlan, J. and S. Amon. “ Approximation of the carrier generation rate in illuminated silicon,” Solid State Electron, 28, pp. 1241–43, 1985. [13] Mohammad S. N., “An alternative method for the performance analysis of silicon solar cells,” J. Appl. Phys, 62(2), pp. 767-772, 1987. [14] Barro F.I., Zerbo I., Lemrabott O.H., Zougmore F. and Sissoko G., “Bulk and surface recombination parameters measurement in silicon double sided surface field solar cell under constant white bias light,” Proc.17th European PVSEC Munich 36, pp. 368-371, 2001. [15] Sissoko, G., C. Museruka, A. Corréa, I. Gaye and A. L. Ndiaye, “Light spectral effect on recombination parameters of silicon solar cell,” Renewable Energy 3, pp. 1487-1490, 1996. [16] Sissoko G., Sivoththananm S., Rodot M. and Mialhe P., “Constant Illumnation- Induced Open Circuit Voltage Decay ( CIOCVD ) method, as applied to high efficiency Si Solar cells for bulk and back surface characterization,” Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 15 IPASJ International Journal of Electrical Engineering (IIJEE) A Publisher for Research Motivation........ Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Web Site: http://www.ipasj.org/IIJEE/IIJEE.htm Email: editoriijee@ipasj.org ISSN 2321-600X 11th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, poster 1B, 12-16, Montreux, Switzerland, pp. 352-354, 1992. [17] Diallo H. L., Maiga A. S., Wereme A. and Sissoko G., “New approach of both junction and back surface recombination velocities in a 3D modeling study of a polycrystalline silicon solar cell,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys., 42, pp. 193- 211, 2008. [18] Bashahu M. and Habyarimana A., “Review and test of methods for determination of the solar cell series resistance,” Renewable Energy, 6(2), pp. 129- 138, 1995. [19] Pysch D., Mette A. and Glunz S. W., “A review and comparison of different methods to determine the series resistance of the solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials & solar cells, 91, pp. 1698 - 1706, 2007. [20] El-Adawi M. K. and Al-Nuaim I. A., “A method to determine the solar cell series resistance from a single I-V characteristic curve considering its shunt resistance – new approach,” Vacuum, 64, pp. 33- 36, 2002. [21] Bouzidi K., Chegaar M. and Bouhemadou A., “Solar cells parameters evaluation considering the series and shunt resistance,” Solar Energy Materials & solar cells, 91, pp. 1647- 1651, 2007. [22] Mbodji S., Ly I., Diallo. H. L., Dione M. M., Diasse O. and Sissoko G., “Modeling study of n+/p solar cell resistances from single I-V characteristic curve considering the junction recombination velocity (Sf),” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(1), pp. 1-7, 2011. AUTHOR Miss Oulimata Mballo was born in Oussouye, Senegal in 1988.She is working on her doctoral thesis in the laboratory of semiconductors and renewableergy of the Faculty of Science and Technology of the University Cheikh Anta Diop in Dakar, Senegal. His research interest is in the field renewable energy, Semiconductor devices characterization and electronics Volume 4, Issue 7, July 2016 Page 16