Circuits and Systems, 2011, 2, 297-310 doi:10.4236/cs.2011.24042 Published Online October 2011 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/cs) Distortionless Lossy Transmission Lines Terminated by in Series Connected RCL-Loads Vasil G. Angelov1, Marin Hristov2 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Mining and Geology, Sofia, Bulgaria Department of Microelectronics, Technical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria E-mail: angelov@mgu.bg, mhristov@ecad.tu-sofia.bg Received July 29, 2011; revised August 26, 2011; accepted September 4, 2011 2 Abstract The paper deals with a lossy transmission line terminated at both ends by non-linear RCL elements. The mixed problem for the hyperbolic system, describing the transmission line, to an initial value problem for a neutral equation is reduced. Sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of periodic regimes are formulated. The proof is based on the finding out of suitable operator whose fixed point is a periodic solution of the neutral equation. The method has a good rate of convergence of the successive approximations even for high frequencies. Keywords: Lossy Transmission Line, RCL-Nonlinear Loads, Fixed Point, Periodic Solution 1. Introduction The principal importance of transmission lines investigations has been discussed in many papers (cf. for instance [1-8]). In a previous paper [9] we have investigated lossless transmission lines terminated by in series connected RCL-loads. In [10] we have considered a lossy transmission line terminated by a resistive load with exponential V-I characteristic. In [11] we have considered periodic regimes for lossy transmission lines terminated by parallel connected RCL-loads. Here we investigate lossy transmission lines terminated at both ends by in series connected RCL-loads but in contrast of [11] the capacitive element has a nonlinear V-C characteristic. Unlike of the usually accepted approach (cf. for instance [12,13]) we consider first order hyperbolic system instead of the Telegrapher’s equation derived from it. First we reduce the mixed problem for the hyperbolic system to an initial value problem for neutral system of equations on the boundary [14]. Extending ideas from [1517] we introduce operators whose fixed points are periodic solutions of the neutral system. Our treatment is based on the fixed point method (cf. [18]). All derivation are performed under assumption R / L G / C ( R 0, G 0 ). The last condition is known as Heaviside one and it implies that the waves propagate without distortion. We would like to mention the advantages of our Copyright © 2011 SciRes. method in comparison of the other used ones: lumped element method, finite element method and finitedifference time-domain method (cf. for instance [19-21]). If we use numerical methods we have to keep one and same accuracy. But here we consider nonlinearities of polynomial and transcendental type (for exponential ones cf. [10]). For such “bad” nonlinearities (cf. [2]) there are examples showing that if we want to keep the same accuracy it should be reduced step thousands of times. Here we obtain (even though approximate) an analytical solution for voltage and current beginning with simple initial approximations. We proceed from the system: u x, t i x, t Gu x, t 0, t x i x, t u x, t L Ri x, t 0, t x C (1) x, t x, t R 2 : x, t 0, 0, , u x,0 u 0 x , i x,0 i0 x , x 0, (2) where L, C, R and G are prescribed specific parameters of the line and 0 is its length. Here the current i x, t and voltage u x, t are unknown functions. The initial conditions for the foregoing system (1) are prescribed functions u 0 x , i0 x . The boundary conditions can be derived from the loads and sources at the ends of the line (cf. Figure 1). CS 298 V. G. ANGELOV ET AL. Analogously for x (cf. Figure 1) we obtain t u , t E1 t R1 i , t C11 i , t d T (5) di , t dL1 i , t . i , t L1 i , t di dt Figure 1. Lossy transmission line terminated by nonlinear RCL-loads. In view of the Kirchoff’s voltage law for the voltages between the nodes a, b and d for x = 0 we obtain: u 0, t uad uba ubd uba E0 t , (3) where E0 (t ) is the source voltage. The voltage uba is: uba uR0 uC0 u 0 R0 i 0, t uC0 d 0 dt . To calculate the voltage of the condenser C0 we proceed from the relation (assuming uC0 T u T 0 ), i t dq d C0 u .u i x, d C0 u u C0 u dt dt T or t uC0 u 0, t C i 0, d . T To calculate the voltage of the inductor L0 we proceed from 1 0 u 0 dL i di d 0 L0 i i i 0 L0 i dt di dt . Therefore the first boundary condition is: t uba R0 i 0, t C01 i 0, d T di 0, t dL0 i 0, t i 0, t L0 i 0, t di dt or t u 0, t E0 t R0 i 0, t C01 i 0, d T (4) di 0, t dL0 i 0, t . i 0, t L0 i 0, t di dt Copyright © 2011 SciRes. Here R1 . , C1 . and L1 . are characteristics (in general, nonlinear functions) of RCL-loads at right end. Now we are able to formulate the initial-boundary (mixed) value problem for the hyperbolic transmission line system of equations: to find a solution system (1) for u x, t , i x, t of the hyperbolic x, t x, t R 2 : 0 x , t 0 , satisfying the initial conditions u x,0 u0 x , i x,0 i0 x for x 0, (6) and the boundary conditions t u 0, t E0 t R0 i 0, t C01 i 0, d T (7) di 0, t dL0 i 0, t i 0, t L0 i 0, t , di dt t u , t E1 t R1 i , t C11 i , t d T (8) dL1 (i , t ) di , t i , t L1 i , t di dt where u0 x , i0 x , Ek t , Rk . , Ck . and Lk (.) (k 0, 1) are prescribed functions. So the system (1) and conditions (6) - (8) form a mixed problem for a lossy transmission line equations. 2. Reducing the Mixed Problem for the Transmission Line System to an Initial Value Problem for a Nonlinear Neutral System First we present system (1) in matrix form: U U , Ux AU 1 t A2U x A3U 0 U t t x (9) C 0 0 1 G 0 where A1 , A2 1 0 , A3 0 R , 0 L ut u x u U , Ut , U x . i it ix Since A1 LC 0 , then multiplying Equation (9) by A11 we obtain CS V. G. ANGELOV U t AU x BU 0 (10) Vx Vt 1 LC 0 1 LC I x I t 0 0 1 C G C 0 , B where A . In order to tran1 L 0 0 R L 0 1 C sform the matrix A A11 A2 in a diagonal 1 L 0 form we solve the characteristic equation: 1 C 0 1 L whose roots are 1 1 LC and 2 1 LC . Denote the matrix formed by eigenvectors by C L H L C and its inverse one—by 1 1 C 1 C H 1 . 2 1 L 1 L If we denote by 1 LC 0 Acan , 1 LC 0 then Acan HAH 1 . Introduce new variables Z = HU (or U = H–1Z): u x, t V x , t 2 C I x , t 2 C i x, t V x , t 2 L I x , t 2 L . (11) (12) Replacing U H Z in Equation (10) we obtain H Z A H Z B 1 1 G C R L G C R L HBH 1 2 G C R L G C R L and then Copyright © 2011 SciRes. 1 Vt 1 It LC I LC Vx R L V 0 x R L I 0. (14) The new initial conditions we obtain from conditions (6) and system (12): V x,0 C u x, 0 L i x, 0 (15) C u0 x L i0 x I 0 x , x 0, . (16) Further on we set V x, t e R L t V x, t , J x, t e R L t R L t W ( x, t ), I x, t e I x, t R L t J x, t . (17) LC . (18) 0 x , J 0, t I 0, t I 0 x . From system (12) and denotation (17) we obtain u x, t W x, t J x, t e But or W 0, t V 0, t V Z t H AH 1 Z x H BH 1 Z 0 , i.e. Z t Acan Z x HBH 1 Z 0 . 1 Vx R L 0 V 0 LC I x 0 R L I 0 The initial conditions (15), (16) remain the same ones: 0 LC After multiplication from the left by H we obtain Vt 1 I t 0 Wt vWx 0, J t vJ x 0 v 1 H 1Z t AH 1 Z x BH 1 Z 0. Then HBH–1 can be simplified and the last system becomes: Then system (14) can be written in the form: H 1 Z 0 . t x Since H–1 is a constant matrix we have: We consider distortionless lossy transmission lines that means the following Heaviside condition is fulfilled: R LG C. W x, t e 1 1 G C R L V 0 . G C R L I 0 I x, 0 C u x , 0 L i x , 0 Then I x, t C u x , t L i x , t , 1 G C R L 2 G C R L C u0 x L i0 x V0 x , x 0, , V x, t u x, t Z . , U I x, t i x, t V x, t C u x, t L i x , t 299 ET AL. (13) R L t i x, t W x, t J x, t e R L t 2 C , 2 L (19) and then W x, t e R Lt J x , t e R Lt C u x, t e R Lt C u x, t e R Lt L i x, t , L i x, t . CS 300 V. G. ANGELOV ET AL. Replacing in system (19) x 0 we have u 0, t W 0, t J 0, t e i 0, t W 0, t J 0, t e R L t R L t 2 C , 2 L and replacing x — u , t W , t J , t e i , t W , t J , t e 2 C , R L t 2 L . R L t (20) (21) Now replace expressions (20) into the first boundary condition and obtain: W 0, t J 0, t e E0 t R0 W 0, t J 0, t e R L t R L t W , t J , t e (22) E1 t R1 (W , t J , t ) e R L s C11 W , s J , s e T t dL1 i , t i , t L1 i , t di d W , t J , t e R L t dt L0 t i 0, t di R L t dL1 i , t di Copyright © 2011 SciRes. L1 i , t 2 L t C11 W , J 0, T e ( R / L ) 2 L d T d L1 t W , t J 0, t T e ( R / L )t 2 L . dt Then we put t T t and change the variables in the integrals: (23) 2 C t C01 W J T e R L T T L0 t T W t T J t e R L t T 2 C E1 t T R1 W t T J t e T dL0 i 0, t 2 L 2 L d d W t J t T e R L t T dt R L t T C11 W T J e R L T 2 L di L (W 0, t J 0, t ) e 2 L , 0 2 C E0 t T R0 W t J t T e R L t T L0 i 0, t W t J t T e R L t T 2 L . R L t W , t J 0, t T e ( R / L )t t W 0, t J 0, t e L1 t i , t 2 L 2 L ds 2 C R L t t R L C01 W 0, t T J 0, e 2 L d T d L0 t W 0, t T J 0, e R L 2 L dt Introduce denotations dL0 i 0, t E0 t R0 W 0, t T J 0, t e E1 t R1 W , t J 0, t T e ( R / L )t 2 C R L t 2 C W 0, t T J 0, t e R Lt and Replacing expressions (21) into the second boundary condition we obtain the following equation We assume that the unknown functions are W , t W t , J 0, t J t . An integration along the charateristics yields W , t T W 0, t , J , t J 0, t T and then Equations (22) and (23) become 1 R L t 2 L t R L t C W 0, J 0, e 2 L d T dL0 i 0, t i 0, t L0 i 0, t di d R L t W 0, t J 0, t e 2 L . dt 1 0 R L t 1 2 C R L t dL i , t 2 L di L W , t J , t e 2 L . W , t J , t e 2 L , 2 C 2 L d d L1 t T W t T J t e R L t T dt 2 L . To solve the above equations with respect to the derivatives dW (t ) dt and dJ (t ) dt we have to divide the above equations into L0 (t T ) and L1 (t T ), respectively. But CS V. G. ANGELOV u k di d k dLk i dLk i .i dLk i i Lk i dt dt dt d i dt k 0,1 m where Lk i an i n . Then since k We also briefly recall: i t dq d C0 u .u i x, d C0 u .u C0 u dt dt T and n0 m m t uC0 u 0, t C01 i 0, d T k i i.Lk i i. an i n an i n 1 . k n 0 we get dLk i i di dLk i di m k n 0 where ck , k , h [2,3], m i nan i n 1 an i n n 0 k Introduce denotations 1 W , J t e R L t T 2 L , W t T J t 2 L . dL0 0 W , J t L0 (t T ) 0 W , J t L0 0 W , J t n0 n T 0 0 T 0 0 imply m k Lk t T n 1 an n 0 k W , J t n Lk 0 1 Lk t T 1 Lk 1 L k 0,1 where 1 L max 1 Lk : k 0,1 . This can be done if the polynomials have suitable properties (cf. 4. Numerical example). Copyright © 2011 SciRes. 1 h k u h dCk u du 1 , u W0 , W0 . 0 the inverse function exists for ck u h k h k u : W0 ,W0 then W J e 2 L i , (24) W e J 2 L i 0 du k h k hu u c h k W0 ck h k W0 , k h W h k W0 k 0 We have to ensure a strict positive lower bound for Lk t T , k 0,1 . We can find an interval i i0 such that the inequalities R L T0 dCk u Ck u uCk u n 0 1 W , J t e ck h di m 0 Ck u u dL1 1 W , J t n 1 an1 1 W , J t . R L T0 k 0, 1 h k . h 1 Since n L1 1 W , J t k u u n 1 an(0) 0 W , J t , L1 t T 1 W , J t du Since di m 0 W , J t e dCk u W t J t T Therefore h The derivatives of the functions Ck (u ) uCk (u ) are n 0 0 W , J t e 1 u / k ck h k u W0 min 0 , 1 h h 1 . m R L t T h are constants and n 0 n 1 an(k )i n , k 0,1 . ck Ck u Lk i k 301 ET AL. c h k W0 ck h k W0 , Ck1 I : k W0 , W0 , h W h k W0 0 k or Ck1 I W0 . The explicit form of the inverse function for h 2 is: ck k u k u I c k u k I 2 I 2u 2 k 2 ck2 k u 2 I 2 u k I 2 0, Ck1 I I 2 I 4 4ck2 2k I 2 2ck2 k k 0,1 . We need the derivative given below (see Equation (26)) CS 302 V. G. ANGELOV and the following estimates: I ET AL. W J T e t c k W0 min k , h k W0 k W0 ck k W0 ck k W0 h W k 0 h h R L T T W T J e t and R L T T dCk1 I dI I 2 4ck2 2k 1 I ck2 k I 2 4ck2 2k 1 I I 2 4ck2 2k 2 ck k W T J e t T W0 J 0 e T 2 2 2 4ck k R L T T W T J e R L T T 1 I 2 dCk1 I ck k dI 1 2 I ck k dt dJ t dt dJ t T dt 2e R / L t T L0 2e R / L t T L0 dW t T dt Copyright © 2011 SciRes. L1 R L T 2 L e 2 L d R L T0 R L 1 For the I-V characteristics we assume that they are polynomial functions 2 L d Rk i rn i n , k 0,1 . m k n 1 Now we are able to formulate a periodic problem for the obtained neutral system: c k W0 I 2 2ck2 k2 , I k ,0 2 2 2 k W0 I 4ck k , ck k W0 I 2 2ck2 k2 , I 0, k W0 I 2 4ck2 k2 (26) R R R / L t T W t J t T 2e LE0 t T W t J t T Z 0 L L R / L t T L e R0 W t J t T 2 L R / L t T t L 1 e C0 W J T d U W , J t . T 2 L L0 (27) R R R L t T W t T J t 2e LE1 t T L1 L L 0 R L t T k W0 2 L d ,. W t T J t Z 2e ck k W0 R L T W0 e T J 0 e 0 1 ck k W0 . R L k W0 2 L of C01 . , C11 . should satisfy the inequalities dW t , and Therefore the arguments t k W0 R L T W0 J 0 e T e 0 1 ck k W0 R L 2 L k W0 (25) W J T e 2 L d ck k W0 we obtain W 2 1 0 k 0,1 . ck k t or in view of the inequality c k W0 1 ck k W0 2 k W ck k k W0 k 0 2 L d L 2e L1 R L t T L1 L R1 e R L t T 2 L W t T J t (28) t e R L t T C11 W T J d I W , J s , t T , T T0 , T 2 L CS V. G. ANGELOV Bu W , J t : 0 t , t 0, T , W t 0 t , W t 0 t , J t t , J t t , t 0, T . 0 Bi W , J t : 0 t , t 0, T , 0 The initial functions 0 t , 0 t can be obtained from the initial conditions (7) by shifting along the characteristics of the initial functions u0 x , i0 x (cf. [9-11]). t Bu W , J t : U W , J s ds T t T 1 T T0 U W , J s ds 2 T T0 3. Main Results Here we formulate conditions for the existence-uniqueness of a periodic solution of neutral functional differential system (27), (28) (for definition of neutral equation see [15]). First we define a suitable operator generating by the right-hand sides of the Equations (27), (28). We find a T0 periodic solution of Equations (27), (28) on the interval T , T T0 coinciding with prescribed T0 periodic function on 0,T and then one can continue it periodically because our system is autonomous one. By L1,T0 T , we mean the space consisting of all measurable essentially bounded T0 periodic functions whose derivatives are also essentially bounded and T0 periodic. Introduce the sets: M u f L1,T0 T , : T T0 t T , T , M i f L1,T0 T , : t T , T . 303 ET AL. 1 T0 T T0 t U W , J s dsdt , t T , T T0 T T t Bi W , J t : I W , J s ds T t T 1 T T0 I W , J s ds 2 T T0 T T 1 0t I W , J s dsdt , t T , T T0 . T0 T T Remark 1. It is easy to see that changing the integration order one obtains T T0 t f t dt 0 f t 0 t , U W , J s dsdt T T0 T T T T0 U W , J s ds T T0 T T0 sU W , J s ds T and T T0 f t dt 0 f t 0 t , T T T0 t T T0 I W , J s dsdt T T0 I W , J s ds T T T Lemma 1. If f (.) M u (respectively f (.) M i ) then T T0 s I W , J s ds. T t F (t ) f ( )d is T0 periodic function. T Assumption (E) Ek . L1,T0 T , , T T0 Ek t dt 0, T Ek t W0 e t T , t T , T T0 , Ek T 0 k 0,1 . Lemma 3. The periodic problem (27), (28) has a solution W . , J . M u M i iff the operator B has a fixed point W , J M u M i , that is, W Bu W , J , J Bi W , J . Introduce the sets f M Assumption (IN) 0 t ,0 t are essentially bounded T0 periodic functions where T mT0 , m 2,3, 4,5, , X u f M u : f t W0 e 0 0 0 0 0, 0 t W0 , 0 t J 0 . Here W0 , J 0 Xi are prescribed positive constants. Lemma 2. If the assumptions (IN) and (E) are fulfilled and W , J M u M i then R0 0 W , J t , t R1 1 (W , J )(t ) , 0 t 0 W , J d t T and 1 t 1 W , J d are T0 periodic funcT tions. Define the operator B Bu , Bi on the set M u M i by the formulas: Copyright © 2011 SciRes. i : f t J0 e , t T , T T . t T t T , t T , T T0 , 0 Here the constant 0 will be prescribed below. The sets X u and X i turn out into metric spaces with metrics W ,W ess sup e t T W t W t : t T , T T0 , (W , W ) ess sup e (t T ) W (t ) W (t ) : t [T , T T0 ] , ( J , J ) ess sup e (t T ) J (t ) J (t ) : t [T , T T0 ] , CS 304 V. G. ANGELOV R L T W0 e T J 0 e 0 1 ck k W0 R , . R L L k W0 2 L ( J , J ) ess sup e (t T ) J (t ) J (t ) : t [T , T T0 ] . Define a metric on X u X i in the following way: W , J , W , J Theorem 1. Let the assumptions (LC), (E) and (IN) be fulfilled. Then there exists a unique T0 periodic solution W , J X u X i of the problem (27), (28). Proof: Define the operator B ( Bu , Bi ) : X u X i X u X i by the above formulas. In what follows we show max W ,W , J , J , W ,W , J , J . e Assumption (LC): e W R L T0 J 0 e T 0 W e R L T0 0 T J0 i , 0 2 L i , W (t ) W0 e (t T ) J (t ) J 0 e (t T ) 0 2 L Bu W0 e (t T ) Bi J 0 e ( t T ) . W0 J 0 e T e R L T0 1 ck k W0 , R L k W0 2 L Bu (W , J )(t ) t U (W , J )( s )ds T 1 T0 ET AL. 1 2 Using inequality (24) and proceeding as in [11] we obtain (for sufficiently large R / L ): T T0 U (W , J )( s )ds T T T0 t 0 0 1 T ( t T ) e U W J s s t e e J0 ( , )( )d d 0 T T T ( 0 2)e 0 0 2 R Z 0 W0 J 0 e 2 L W0 (e T 1) R L T0 ( 0 2)e 0 2 0 2 e L0 R L 0 2 0 L L0 1 L0 n 1 rn(0) W0 J 0 e T m n 2 L n ( n 1) R L T0 2e 0 3 0 2 1 e e ( t T )W0 . 2 2 0 (n 1) R nR n 1 For the second component of the operator we obtain Bi (W , J )(t ) 1 t T T0 I (W , J )( s)ds 2 T I (W , J )( s)ds T 1 T0 T T0 t I (W , J )( s)ds dt T T e (t T ) W0 e T e 0 0 1 0 W0 e T 1 R L Z 0 L1 2e 0 0 2 e 30 2 / 2 0 L1 m 0 0 2 2 0 4 e R L T 0 rn(1) W0 e T J 0 n 1 2 L n 1 n n e R L T0 1 L W0 e T 1 L1 R L n ( n 1) R L T0 1 e J 0 e ( t T ) . (n 1) R nR Therefore the operator B maps the set X u X i into itself. In what follows we show that B is contractive operator. We need the following preliminary inequalities 0 (W , J )(t ) 0 W , J (t ) 1 (W , J )(t ) 1 W , J (t ) Copyright © 2011 SciRes. e R L ( t T ) 2 L e R L ( t T ) 2 L W ,W J , J e , T W ,W e T J , J , CS V. G. ANGELOV 0 W , J (t ) 0 (W , J )(t ) n n e R L T0 W 0 1 (W , J )(t )n 1 W , J (t ) n e R L T0 W e T 0 n 2 L J 0 e T J0 305 ET AL. n 1 e R L ( t T ) W ,W J, J e 2 L . T n 2 L n 1 e R L ( t T ) W ,W e T 2 L . J , J Then for the first operator component we obtain: Bu W , J (t ) Bu W , J (t ) T T0 t t T 1 T T0 U W , J ( s ) U W , J ( s ) ds U W , J ( s )ds U W , J ( s )ds 2 T T T T0 e 1 T0 T T0 t t U W , J (s)ds U W , J (s)ds dt T T T 0 T ( 0 2)e 0 0 2 1 e T W , J , W , J ) e 0 1 e 2 0 0 2 ( t T ) 1 R L Z 0 L0 L0 r m n 1 (0) n ne ( n 1) R / L T0 (W0 J 0 e T ) n 1 2 L n 1 2 1 W0 0 c L R L 0 0 e (t T ) K u W , J , W , J . Further on we have Bi (W , J )(t ) Bi (W , J )(t ) T T0 t t T 1 T T0 I (W , J )( s ) I (W , J )( s ) ds I (W , J )( s )ds I (W , J )( s )ds 2 T T T T0 e 1 T0 T T0 t t I (W , J )(s)ds I (W , J )(s)ds dt T T ( t T ) T 0 e 0 1 e T ( 0 2)e 0 0 2 (e T 1) ((W , J ), ( J , W )) 2 0 0 2 ( n 1) R / L T0 (W0 e T J 0 ) n 1 2 m (1) ne 2 R L Z 0 L0 rn 1 W0 1 n 1 L c L R L n 1 1 1 1 2 L e (t T ) K i W , J , J ,W . Finally we have to obtain an estimate for t [T , T T0 ] . It is easy to prove the following inequalities: Copyright © 2011 SciRes. CS 306 V. G. ANGELOV ET AL. Bu (W , J )(t ) Bu (W , J )(t ) U (W , J )(t ) U (W , J )(t ) e ( t T ) 1 T0 T T0 U (W , J )( s )ds T T T0 U (W , J )( s )ds T T R Z e 0 0 1 1 e 1 T 0 ((W , J ), (W , J )) e L L L 0 0 0 m n 1 (0) n r ne ( n 1) R L T0 W 0 2 L J 0 e T n 1 n 1 L0 c0 R L 2 1 W0 0 e (t T ) K u W , J , J , W . For the derivative of the second component of B we obtain B (W , J )(t ) B (W , J )(t ) i i I (W , J )(t ) I (W , J )(t ) 1 T0 T T0 I (W , J )( s)ds T T T0 I (W , J )( s )ds T e 0 0 1 (e T 1) e (t T ) ((W , J ), (W , J )) e T 0 R Z e 1 0 n rn(1) L L L 1 1 n 1 m R ( n 1) T0 L (W0 e T J 0 ) n 1 (2 L ) n 1 e (t T ) K i W , J , J , W . The above inequalities imply ( B(W , J ), B(W , J )) K ((W , J ), (W , J )) c1 L1 R L 2 1 W0 1 We choose 2 1012. Then T0 0 2 and T 6 109 2 1012 T0 12000 T0 . Consequently where K max K u , K i , K u , K i should be chosen T 2 1012 6 10 smaller than 1. Therefore B is contractive operator and has a unique fixed point in M (cf. [18]). It is a unique periodic solution of system (26), (27). Theorem 1 is thus proved. R L 0.0029 (0.45 106 ) 0.6 104 , e R L T0 0 e( R / L )T 4. Numerical Example R L 1012 , e For a transmission line with length 1m, L 0.45 H m, C 80 pF m , cross-section area S 6 mm 2 , specific resistance for the cuprum c 0.0175 , that is, R c S 3.103 , v 1 LC 1 (6 109 ) 1.66 108 , 9 Z 0 L C 75 . Then T LC 6 10 sec . Let us check the propagation of millimeter waves 0 1 6 103 m . We have f 0 1 0 LC 1012 Hz T0 1 f 0 1012. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. 9 12 103 e T 0 , RT L 0, RT L e0 1 R L 2 1012 104 1012 (2 108 ) 2 1012 , 0 1 6.6 106 , R L T0 e 0 e R L T0 e2 . We choose resistive elements with the following V-I characteristics R0 (u ) R1 (u ) 0.028u 0.125u 3 i.e. r1 0.028, r2 0, r3 0.125 , and inductive element with L0 (i ) L1 (i ) 3 i 1 12 i 3 . Then L (i ) i dL (i ) di L (i ) 6 i 1 3 i 3 . 0 0 0 If we choose i0 1 one obtains 6i 1 3 i 3 6 1 3 17 / 3 and consequently 1 L 3 17 . Let us take C0 (u ) C1 (u ) c 1 u c u , where h 2, c 50 pF 5 1011 F and 0.4 V CS V. G. ANGELOV W0 0.4 . Then the inequalities of Theorem 1 become e W R L T0 0 e 2W0 e J0e T 0 e J0 2 2 L 2 R L T0 W0 e 2 1 2 L 1 2 L 1 W 2 L e W e J 2 L 1 2 L 1 J 2 L e cW0 W0 J 0 e2 1 0 2 L 2 0 0.18 10 W0 2c L e2 1 W0 min 13.252 0.4; 0.18 103 0.18 103 , 0.18 103 , T 0 307 ET AL. 3 J0 and cW0 W0 2 c L W0 (e 2 1) W0 6 106 ; 1 2 R Z 0 (4e2 2) L 1 e2 1 0,125W02 e6 2e 4 1 e 0, 028 1, L L L L 2 L 24 1 R Z 0 L L (e2 3) L W0 e 2 2 0,125 J 03 6 2 2 e W 0.028 J ( e 1) (e 1) J 0 , 0 0 L 2L 12 L 3e4 W02 e2 1 R Z 0 1 K u 0.028 0.125 2 L L L 4L 3e 4 J 02 e2 1 R Z0 1 K i 0.028 0.125 2 L L L 4L 2 1 (W0 / ) / ( Lc) 1, 2 1 (W0 / ) / ( Lc) 1. Taking into account R L Z 0 L 104 (0.6 13.24 10 4 ) 0.6 104 , W0 0.18 103 and J 0 3 106 we see that 1/ (2 1012 ) 4.44 104 5.58 0.45 106 13 / 17 0.118 3.4 1, 106 8 0.83 0.54 106 (3.375 10 12 )404 / 5.4 6, K u , K i K i K u (2,1/ 1012 )(0.6 104 0.072 0.0036)13 107 1. Most often the initial approximation is chosen to be simple functions, namely: W sin 0 t , t [0, T ] W (0) (t ) 0 ; 0, t [T , T T0 ] J sin 0 t , t [0, T ] J (0) (t ) 0 0, t [T , T T0 ] ((W ,J 1.13 107 ), (W ,J ( n) 7 t (1) t 2 L e W (t ) J (t T ) Copyright © 2011 SciRes. 3 R L ( s T ) R0 0 (W (0) , J (0) )( s ) L (s T ) ds 0 2 L R L ( s T ) R0 (i0 ) L (s T ) ds 0 T t L0 (t T ) , J (1) , W (0) , J (0) , We notice that L0 (i ) L1 (i ) 6i 1 3 i 3 imply ( R / L )( t T ) T (n 1, 2 ) 6 e 6 e ( R / L )(t T ) W (t T ) J (t ) 2 L 2 L e )) 1 1.13 10 W n 3 and therefore (recall 0 i0 1, 1 i0 1 ): J ( n 1) (t ) Bi (W ( n ) , J ( n ) ) (n 0,1, 2,) and (n) , L1 (t T ) Then we have W ( n 1) (t ) Bu (W ( n ) , J ( n ) ), ( n 1) 1 3 e ( R / L )(t T ) W (t T ) J (t ) 2 L ( 0 2π T0 ) and E0 (t ) E1 (t ) E0 sin 0 t . ( n 1) 1 3 e ( R / L )(t T ) W (t ) J (t T ) 2 L 2 L e R L ( s T ) 0, 028 0,125 ( L )ds T 0.31L L e R L T0 LR 0.074 10 1 12 0. Analogously CS 308 V. G. ANGELOV t 2 L e R L ( s T ) R1 1 (W (0) , J (0) )( s ) ET AL. R LT L1 ( s T )ds 6 L 17 0.028 0.125 e 0 1 L R 0. T We find the first approximation t t T 1 T T0 U (W (0) , J (0) )( s )ds W (1) (t ) Bu (W (0) , J (0) )(t ) U (W (0) , J (0) )( s )ds T 2 T T 0 1 T0 T T0 t U (W T (0) , J (0) )( s )dsdt T t t T T J 0 sin 0 t R L J 0 sin 0 s ds 2 E0 L e R L ( s T ) sin 0 s L0 s T ds t t R L ( s T ) C01 s R L ( T ) e Z 0 J 0 sin 0 s L0 s T ds 2 L J 0 sin 0 d ds e T T L0 ( s T ) 2 L T T T0 T T0 t T 1 R L ( s T ) sin 0 s L0 s T ds Z 0 J 0 sin 0 s L0 s T ds 2 E0 L e 2 T T T0 2 L T T0 T 1 T0 T T0 T R L ( s T ) J s R L ( T ) e C01 0 e sin 0 d ds L0 ( s T ) 2 L T t t R L ( s T ) sin 0 sL0 ( s T )ds J 0 sin 0 t R L J 0 sin 0 sds 2 E0 L e T T t t R L ( s T ) J s R L ( T ) e C01 0 e sin 0 d ds dt. Z 0 J 0 sin 0 s L0 s T ds 2 L T T L0 ( s T ) 2 L T t Since R L J 0 sin 0 s ds J 0 109 and T R L ( s T ) s 2 L L R L T0 e R L ( T ) 1 J 0 1 W0 3.6 108 0 sin 0 d ds W0 C e L (s T ) 0 2 L e L R T 0 T t 2 L we can disregard this terms and obtain t W (1) (t ) J 0 sin 0 t 2 E0 L e R L ( s T ) t sin 0 s ds Z 0 J 0 sin 0 s L0 ( s T ) ds L0 ( s T ) T T T T0 T T0 t T 1 2 E0 L e R L ( s T ) sin 0 s L0 ( s T ) ds Z 0 J 0 sin 0 s L0 ( s T ) ds 2 T T T0 1 T0 T T0 T t t R L ( s T ) sin 0 s L0 ( s T ) ds Z 0 J 0 sin 0 s L0 ( s T ) ds dt , 2 E0 L e T T and then W (1) (t ) W (0) (t ) J 0 2 E0 L L RL e R L T0 t 1 Z 0 J 0 L e ( s T ) ds E0 L L RL e R L T0 1 T Z0 J 0 2L T T0 e ( s T ) ds T 5 L3 2 LR e R L T0 1 T0 T T0 T 2E L t L RL e R L T0 1 Z 0 J 0 L e ( s T ) ds dt J 0 T 0 2L 1 E0 5Z 0 J 0 e 0 1 e 0 J 0 e 2 J 0 . Copyright © 2011 SciRes. CS V. G. ANGELOV 309 ET AL. For the derivative we have 1 W (1) (t ) U (W (0) , J (0) )(t ) T0 0 J 0 cos 0 t T T0 U (W (0) , J (0) )( s )ds T E0 L 2e R J 0 sin 0 t L L0 (t T ) R L ( t T ) 2e Z 0 J 0 sin 0 t L0 R L ( t T ) L R 0 (W (0) , J (0) )(t ) L (t T ) 0 T T0 R L ( t T ) 1 L 1 t 2e R L ( s T ) C0 0 (W (0) , J (0) )( )d 2 E L e L0 (t T ) T T T0 T T0 1 Z 0 J 0 sin 0 T0 T L (s T ) ds 2 0 T T0 L e R L ( s T ) L0 ( s T ) ds R0 0 (W (0) , J (0) )( s ) T L (s T ) ds 0 T T0 R L ( s T ) s e 1 L 2 C01 0 (W (0) , J (0) )( )d ds . T0 T L0 ( s T ) T Then we obtain W (1) (t ) W (0) (t ) Z R Z 0 0 0 (e 0 1) 0 J 0 2 L L e RT0 L L L 2 L L 0.028 0.125 e RT0 Since e RT0 L 1 RT0 L 1, L (e RT0 L L e RT0 L 1 RT0 L E0 W0 1) RT0 L 2 L L e RT0 L 1 RT0 L W0 . E0 0.5 V we have 225(e2 1) 3 0.45 106 W (1) (t ) W (0) (t ) 2π 1012 0, 6.104 2 6W0 0, 612 3.768 107. J0 34 17 (1) (0) 6 It follows W ,W 18.84 10 . Consequently 1.13 10 )) 7 ((W ( n 1) ,J ( n 1) ), (W ( n) ,J (n) n 1 1.13 107 3.8 107 (n 0,1, ) W ( n 1) (t ) W ( n ) (t ) 7.4(1.13 107 ) n 3.8 107 (1.13 107 ) n (2.82) 108. or In the same way we can obtain an estimate for the second component of the operator B: J (1) (t ) Bi (W (0) , J (0) )(t ) W0 sin 0 t T T t T 1 T T0 1 0t (0) (0) (0) (0) I ( W , J )( s )d s I ( W , J )( s )d s I (W (0) , J (0) )( s )dsdt 2 T T0 T T T T0 t t RW0 t e R L ( s T ) sin d 2 ds s s E L 0 0 L T T L1 ( s T ) T T0 R L ( s T ) T T0 t T 1 W sin 0 s W0 sin 0 s e 2 E0 L ds ds Z 0 0 ds 2 L1 ( s T ) T L1 ( s T ) T L1 ( s T ) T T0 t Z0 1 T0 T T0 T t R L ( s T ) t W0 sin 0 s e E L 2 0 L (s T ) ds Z 0 L (s T ) ds dt. T 1 T 1 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. CS 310 V. G. ANGELOV 5. Acknowledgements The research described in this paper was carried out within the frame work of Contract No. DUNK-01/03 -12.2009 (UNIK). 6. References [1] M. Shimura, “Analysis of Some Nonlinear Phenomena in a Transmission Line,” IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1967, pp. 60-68. doi:10.1109/TCT.1967.1082648 [2] L. O. Chua and P.-M. Lin, “Machine Analysis of Electronic Circuits,” in Russian, Energy, Moscow, 1980. [3] D. M. Pozar, “Microwave Engineering,” 2nd Edition, New York, Wiley, 1998. [4] P. Chirlian, “Analysis and Design of Integrated Electronic Circuits,” Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., New York, 1987. [5] C. R. Paul, “Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines,” Wiley-Interscience Publications, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 1994. [6] L. O. Chua, C. A. Desoer and E. S. Kuh, “Linear and Nonlinear Circuits,” McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1987. [7] A. H. Zemanian, “Hyperreal Waves on Transfinite, Terminated Distortionless and Lossless Transmission Lines,” International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2005, pp.183-193. doi:10.1002/cta.314 [8] S. Rosenstark, “Transmission Lines in Computer Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1994. [9] V. G. Angelov, “Transmission Lines Terminated by Series Nonlinear RLC-Loads,” Annual of the University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Vol. 41, Sofia, 2000-2001, pp. 9-29. [10] V. G. Angelov, “Lossy Transmission Lines Terminated by Nonlinear R-Loads with Exponential V-I Chara- cteristics,” Journal Nonlinear Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2007, pp. 579-589. Copyright © 2011 SciRes. ET AL. [11] V. G. Angelov, “Periodic Regimes for Distortionless Lossy Transmission Lines Terminated by Parallel Connected RCL-Loads,” In: Transmission Lines: Theory, Types and Applications. Ser. Electrical Engineering Developments, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2011. [12] S. Grivet-Talocia, H. M. Huang, A. E. Rudehli, F. Canavero and I. M. Elfadel, “Transient Analysis of Lossy Transmission Lines: An Efficient Approach Based on the Method of Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2004, pp. 45-56. doi:10.1109/TADVP.2004.825467 [13] V. Rasvan, “Functional Differential Equations and OneDimensional Distortionless Propagation,” Tatra Mountains Mathematical Publications, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 215228. [14] K. L. Cooke and D. W. Krumme, “Differential-Difference Equations and Nonlinear Initial Boundary Value Problems for Linear Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1968, pp. 372-387. doi:10.1016/0022-247X(68)90038-3 [15] A. D. Myshkis, “Linear Differential Equations with Retarded Arguments,” in Russian, Nauka, Moscow, 1972. [16] M. A. Krasnoselskii, “The Shift Operator along the Trajectories,” in Russian, Moscow, 1970. [17] Y. G. Borisovich, “Nonlinear Fredholm Mappings and Periodic Solutions of Functional Differential Equations,” in Russian, Proceedings of Mathematical Faculty, Vol. 10, 1973, pp. 12-25. [18] V. G. Angelov, “Fixed Points in Uniform Spaces and Applications,” Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2009. [19] T. Dhaene and D. D. Zutter, “Selection of Lumped Models for Coupled Lossy Transmission Lines,” IEEE Transaction on Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 11, No. 7, 1992, pp. 805-815. doi:10.1109/43.144845 [20] S. Y. Lee, A. Konrad and R. Saldanha, “Lossy Transmission Line Transient Analysis by the Finite Element Method,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1993, pp. 1730-1732. doi:10.1109/20.250739 [21] Taflove and S. C. Hagness, “Computational Electromagnetics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method,” 2nd Edition, Artech House, Boston, 2000. CS