Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Analysis Volume 2016, Article ID 4760839, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4760839 Research Article Variational-Like Inequalities for Weakly Relaxed π-πΌ Pseudomonotone Set-Valued Mappings in Banach Space Syed Shakaib Irfan and Mohammad Firdosh Khan College of Engineering, Qassim University, P.O. Box 6677, Buraidah, Al-Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia Correspondence should be addressed to Syed Shakaib Irfan; shakaib@qec.edu.sa Received 1 July 2016; Accepted 18 August 2016 Academic Editor: Julien Salomon Copyright © 2016 S. S. Irfan and M. F. Khan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We introduce and study variational-like inequalities for generalized pseudomonotone set-valued mappings in Banach spaces. By using KKM technique, we obtain the existence of solutions for variational-like inequalities for generalized pseudomonotone setvalued mappings in reflexive Banach spaces. The results presented in this paper are generalizations and improvements of the several well-known results in the literature. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries Variational inequality theory plays an important role in many fields, such as optimal control, mechanics, economics, transportation equilibrium, and engineering science. It is well known that monotonicity plays an important role in the study of variational inequality theory. In recent years, a number of authors have proposed many generalizations of monotonicity such as pseudomonotonicity, relaxed monotonicity, relaxed π-πΌ monotonicity, quasimonotonicity, and semimonotonicity, π-monotonicity. For details, refer to [1–11] and the references therein. Verma [11] studied a class of variational inequalities with relaxed monotone operators. In 2003, Fang and Huang [4] introduced a new concept of relaxed π-πΌ monotonicity and obtained the existence of solution for variational-like inequalities in reflexive Banach spaces. B. S. Lee and B. D. Lee [12] defined weakly relaxed πΌ-semipseudomonotone setvalued variational-like inequalities and generalize the result of Fang and Huang [4]. Bai et al. [1] defined relaxed ππΌ-pseudomonotone concepts for single valued mappings. For set-valued mappings, Kang et al. [13] defined relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone concepts which generalize monotone concepts for single valued mapping in Fang and Huang [4] and Bai et al. [1]. Recently Sintunavarat [14] established the existence of solution of mixed equilibrium problem with the weakly relaxed πΌ-monotone bifunction in Banach spaces. In 2013, Kutbi and Sintunavarat [15] introduce two new concepts of weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotone mappings and weakly relaxed π-πΌ semimonotone mappings and obtained the existence of solution for variational-like inequality problems in reflexive Banach spaces. Inspired and motivated by the results of Fang and Huang [4] and Kutbi and Sintunavarat [15], in this paper, we introduce the concept of weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone mapping and by using Knaster Kuratowski Mazurkiewicz (KKM) technique [16], we study some existence of solution for variational-like inequality for set-valued pseudomonotone mapping. In this paper, we suppose that πΈ is a reflexive Banach space with dual space πΈ∗ , and β¨⋅, ⋅β© denotes the pairing between πΈ and πΈ∗ . Let πΎ be a nonempty closed convex subset of πΈ and 2πΈ denote the family of all the nonempty subset of πΈ. The following definitions and results will be useful in our work. ∗ Definition 1. A mapping π : πΎ → 2πΈ is said to be weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone if there exist a mapping π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ and functions π : πΎ × πΎ → π ∪ {+∞}, πΌ : πΈ → π with πΌ(π‘, π§) = π(π‘)πΌ(π§) for π§ ∈ πΈ, where π : (0, ∞) → (0, ∞) is a function with limπ‘→0 (π(π‘)/π‘) = 0, such that β¨π’, π (π₯, π¦)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, (1) 2 International Journal of Analysis ∗ implying β¨V, π (π₯, π¦)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) for π₯, π¦ ∈ πΈ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) , V ∈ π (π¦) . (2) Remark 2. (i) If π(π₯, π₯) = 0 in Definition 1 then we have the following pseudomonotone concept defined in Kang et al. [13]: β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) ≥ 0 ∀π’ ∈ π (π₯) , (3) implying β¨V, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦ − π₯) , ∀V ∈ π (π¦) . (4) (ii) If π is single valued mappings, π(π₯, π₯) = 0, and π(π‘) = π‘π for π > 1, then we have the following relaxed ππΌ monotone concepts defined in Fang and Huang [4] and the following π-πΌ pseudomonotone concepts, defined in Bai et al. [1]: (a) For any π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ β¨ππ₯ − ππ¦, π (π₯, π¦)β© ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) . implies β¨ππ₯, π (π₯, π¦)β© ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) . (5) (6) ∀π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) , V ∈ π (π¦) . ∗ (7) β¨ππ₯ − ππ¦, π (π₯, π¦)β© ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) , ∀π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ, ∗ Definition 4 (see [4]). Let π : πΎ → 2πΈ and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΎ be two mappings and π : πΎ × πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper functional. Then π is said to be π-coercive with respect to first argument of π, if there exists π₯0 ∈ πΎ such that β¨π’ − π’0 , π (π₯, π₯0 )β© + π (π₯, π₯0 ) − π (π₯0 , π₯0 ) σ³¨→ ∞, σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯, π₯0 )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© (8) whenever βπ₯β → ∞, for all π’ ∈ π(π₯), π’0 ∈ π(π₯0 ). If π(⋅, ⋅) = π(⋅) then there exists π₯0 ∈ πΎ such that β¨π’ − π’0 , π (π₯, π₯0 )β© + π (π₯) − π (π₯0 ) σ³¨→ ∞, σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯, π₯0 )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© (9) whenever βπ₯β → ∞, for all π’ ∈ π(π₯), π’0 ∈ π(π₯0 ). If π = πΏπΎ , where πΏπΎ is the indicator function of πΎ, then Definition 4 coincides with the definition of π-coercivity in the sense of Yang and Chen [18]. (11) and then π is said to be relaxed π-πΌ monotone [4]. (ii) If π is single valued and π(π₯, π¦) = π₯ − π¦ then (10) becomes β¨ππ₯ − ππ¦, π₯ − π¦β© ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) , ∀π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ, (12) and then π is called relaxed πΌ-monotone [4]. (iii) If π(π₯, π¦) = π₯ − π¦ for all π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ and πΌ(π§) = πβπ§βπ , where π > 0 and π > 1, then (12) becomes (13) and π is called π-monotone [5, 10, 11]. Definition 7. A mapping π : πΎ → 2πΈ is said to be weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotone if there exists a function π : πΎ×πΎ → πΈ and πΌ : πΈ → R with lim πΌ (π‘π₯) = 0, (∗) π πΌ (π‘π₯) = 0 ππ‘ (∗∗) lim+ π‘→0 for all π‘ > 0 and π₯ ∈ πΈ such that β¨π’ − V, π (π₯, π¦)β© ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) , ∀π₯, π¦ ∈ πΈ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) , V ∈ π (π¦) . is continuous at 0+ . (10) Remark 6. (i) If π is single valued then (10) becomes π‘→0+ Definition 3 (see [17]). Let π : πΎ → 2πΈ and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΎ be two mappings; π is said to be π-hemicontinuous for any π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ, if the mapping defined by π : [0, 1] → R defined by π (π‘) = β¨π (π‘π¦ + (1 − π‘) π₯) , π (π¦, π₯)β© β¨π’ − V, π (π₯, π¦)β© ≥ πΌ (π₯ − π¦) , σ΅©π σ΅© β¨ππ₯ − ππ¦, π₯ − π¦β© ≥ π σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π₯ − π¦σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© , ∀π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ, (b) For any π₯, π¦ ∈ πΎ β¨ππ¦, π (π₯, π¦)β© ≥ 0 Definition 5. A multivalued mapping π : πΎ → 2πΈ is said to be relaxed π-πΌ monotone if there exists a function π : πΎ×πΎ → πΈ and πΌ : πΈ → πΈ with πΌ(π‘π§) = π‘π πΌ(π§) for all π‘ > 0, π > 1, and π§ ∈ πΈ such that (14) Remark 8. If π is single valued mapping then Definition 7 reduces to Definition 9 of [15]. Remark 9. If π is weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotone, then π is weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone mapping but the converse is not true. Definition 10 (see [16]). A mapping πΉ : πΎ → 2πΈ is said to be KKM mapping if, for any {π₯1 , . . . , π₯π } ⊂ πΎ, co{π₯1 , . . . , π₯π } ⊂ βππ=1 πΉ(π₯π ), where co{π₯1 , . . . , π₯π } denote the convex hull of π₯1 , . . . , π₯π . Lemma 11 (see [19]). Let π be a nonempty subset of a Hausdorff topological vector space π and let πΉ : π → 2π be a KKM mapping. If πΉ(π₯) is closed in π for all π₯ ∈ π and compact for some π₯ ∈ π, then β πΉ (π₯) =ΜΈ π. π₯∈π (15) International Journal of Analysis 3 The convexity of π and condition (ii) of Theorem 12 imply that 2. Existence Results In this section, we discuss the existence of the following variational-like inequality: Find π₯ ∈ πΎ such that (VLI) β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, π (π¦π‘ , π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ π ((1 − π‘) π₯ + π‘π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≤ π‘ (π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯)) , β¨Vπ‘ , π (π¦π‘ , π₯)β© = β¨Vπ‘ , π ((1 − π‘) π₯ + π‘π¦, π₯)β© ≤ (1 − π‘) β¨Vπ‘ , π (π₯, π₯)β© ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) , + π‘ β¨Vπ‘ , π (π¦, π₯)β© where πΎ is a nonempty closed convex subset of a reflexive Banach space πΈ. ∗ Theorem 12. Suppose that π : πΎ → 2πΈ is π-hemicontinuous and weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone mapping. Let π : πΎ × πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper convex function and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ be a mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold: (i) π(π₯, π₯) = 0, ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ. (ii) For any fixed π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π(π₯), the mapping π₯ → β¨π’, π(π₯, π¦)β© is convex. (iii) π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) and π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) are convex. (16) ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) , Find π₯ ∈ πΎ such that β¨V, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦ − π₯) , (17) ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, V ∈ π (π¦) . Proof. Suppose that (16) has a solution. So there exist π₯ ∈ πΎ β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, (18) ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) . πΌ (π‘ (π¦ − π₯)) π‘ π (π‘) = πΌ (π¦ − π₯) π‘ (22) for all π¦ ∈ πΎ and Vπ‘ ∈ π(π¦π‘ ). Taking π‘ → 0+ in the previous inequality and using π-hemicontinuity of π, we get (23) (24) is trivial. Therefore π₯ ∈ πΎ is solution of (16). Theorem 13. Let πΎ be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a real reflexive Banach space πΈ and πΈ∗ the dual space ∗ of πΈ. Suppose that π : K → 2πΈ is an π-hemicontinuous and weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone mapping. Let π : πΎ×πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper convex lower semicontinuous function and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ be a mapping. Assume that (i) π(π₯, π¦) + π(π¦, π₯) = 0, ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ, (ii) for any fixed π¦ ∈ πΎ and π’ ∈ π(π₯) the mapping π₯ σ³¨→ β¨π’, π(π¦, π₯)β© is convex and lower semicontinuous function, (iii) π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) and π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) are convex and lower semicontinuous, Since π is weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone, we have (19) (iv) πΌ : πΈ → R is weakly lower semicontinuous; that is, for any net {π₯π½ }, π₯π½ converges to π₯ in π(πΈ, πΈ∗ ) implying that πΌ(π₯) ≤ lim inf πΌ(π₯π½ ). Then problem (17) is solvable. Therefore π₯ ∈ πΎ is a solution of (17). Conversely, suppose that π₯ ∈ πΎ is a solution of (17) and π¦ ∈ πΎ is any point with π(π¦, π¦) < ∞. From (17) we know that π(π₯, π₯) < ∞. For π‘ ∈ (0, 1) let π¦π‘ = (1 − π‘)π₯ + π‘π¦, π‘ ∈ (0, 1); then we have π¦π‘ ∈ πΎ. Since π₯ ∈ πΎ is a solution of problem (17), it follows that = πΌ (π‘ (π¦ − π₯)) = π (π‘) πΌ (π¦ − π₯) . β¨Vπ‘ , π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0 β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, β¨Vπ‘ , π (π¦π‘ , π₯)β© + π (π¦π‘ , π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦π‘ − π₯) It follows from (21) that for all π¦ ∈ πΎ and π’ ∈ π(π₯) with π(π¦, π¦) < ∞. In case of π(π¦, π¦) = ∞ the relation Find π₯ ∈ πΎ such that ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, V ∈ π (π¦) . = π‘ β¨Vπ‘ , π (π¦, π₯)β© . β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, Then problems (16) and (17) are equivalent as follows: β¨V, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦ − π₯) , (21) (20) Proof. Define two set-valued mappings πΉ, πΊ : πΎ → 2πΈ as follows: πΉ (π¦) = {π₯ ∈ πΎ : ∃π’ ∈ π (π₯) , β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0} ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, πΊ (π¦) = {π₯ ∈ πΎ : ∃V ∈ π (π¦) , β¨V, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦ − π₯)} ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ. (25) (26) 4 International Journal of Analysis We claim that πΉ is a KKM mapping. If πΉ is not a KKM mapping, then there exist {π¦1 , π¦2 , . . . , π¦π } ⊂ πΎ such that co{π¦1 , π¦2 , . . . , π¦π } ⊆ΜΈ βππ=1 πΉ(π¦π ). This implies that there exist π¦0 ∈ co{π¦1 , π¦2 , . . . , π¦π } such that π¦ = ∑ππ=1 π‘π π¦π , where π‘π ≥ 0, π = 1, 2, . . . , π, and ∑ππ=1 π‘π = 1, but π¦ ∉ βππ=1 πΉ(π¦π ). From the definition of πΉ, we have β¨V, π (π¦π , π¦)β© + π (π¦π , π¦) − π (π¦, π¦) < 0, for π = 1, 2, . . . , π, (27) π 0 = β¨V, π (π¦, π¦)β© = β¨V, π (∑π‘π π¦π , π¦)β© π=1 π π=1 π=1 ≤ ∑π‘π β¨V, π (π¦π , π¦)β© < ∑π‘π (π (π¦, π¦) − π (π¦π , π¦)) (iii) π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) and π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) are convex and lower semicontinuous, (iv) πΌ : πΈ → R is weakly lower semicontinuous, (v) π is π-coercive with respect to π; that is, there exist π₯0 ∈ πΎ such that β¨π’ − π’0 , π (π₯, π₯0 )β© + π (π₯, π₯0 ) − π (π₯0 , π₯0 ) σ³¨→ +∞, (33) σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯, π₯0 )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© and it follows that π (ii) for any fixed π¦ ∈ πΎ and π’ ∈ π(π₯) the mapping π₯ σ³¨→ β¨π’, π(π¦, π₯)β© is convex and lower semicontinuous function, whenever βπ₯β → ∞. (28) Then problem (16) is solvable. Proof. Let π = π (π¦, π¦) − ∑π‘π π (π¦π , π¦) ≤ π (π¦, π¦) − π (π¦, π¦) = 0, σ΅© σ΅© π΅π = {π¦ ∈ πΈ : σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π¦σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© ≤ π} . π=1 which is a contradiction. This implies that πΉ is a KKM mapping. Now we prove that πΉ(π¦) ⊂ πΊ(π¦), for all π¦ ∈ πΎ. For any given π¦ ∈ πΎ and letting π₯ ∈ πΉ(π¦), we have β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0. β¨V, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦ − π₯) . (30) It follows that π₯ ∈ πΊ(π¦) and so πΉ(π¦) ⊂ πΊ(π¦). This implies that πΊ is also KKM mapping. From the assumption, we know that πΊ(π¦) is weakly closed for all π¦ ∈ πΎ. In fact since π₯ σ³¨→ β¨V, π(π¦, π₯)β© and π are two convex lower semicontinuous functions, from the definition of πΊ and weakly semilower continuity of πΌ, it is easy to see that πΊ(π¦) is weakly closed for all π¦ ∈ πΎ. Since πΎ is bounded closed and convex, we know that πΎ is weakly compact and so πΊ(π¦) is weakly compact in πΎ for each π¦ in πΎ. From Lemma 11 and Theorem 12, we obtain that β πΉ (π¦) = β πΊ (π¦) =ΜΈ π. π¦∈πΎ π¦∈πΎ Consider the following problem, π₯π ∈ πΎ ∩ π΅π , such that β¨π’π , π (π¦, π₯π )β© + π (π¦, π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) ≥ 0, ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ such that π¦ ∈ πΎ ∩ π΅π . (29) Since π is weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone, we get (31) Hence, there exists π₯ ∈ πΎ such that ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) ; (32) that is, problem (16) has a solution. Theorem 14. Let πΎ be a nonempty unbounded closed convex subset of a real reflexive Banach space πΈ and πΈ∗ the dual space ∗ of πΈ. Suppose that π : πΎ → 2πΈ is an π-hemicontinuous and weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone mapping. Let π : πΎ×πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper convex lower semicontinuous function and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ be a mapping. Assume that (i) π(π₯, π¦) + π(π¦, π₯) = 0, ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ, (35) By Theorem 13, we know that (26) has a solution π₯π ∈ πΎ ∩ π΅π ; choose π > βπ₯0 β with π₯0 as in the coercivity conditions. Then we have β¨π’π , π (π₯0 , π₯π )β© + π (π₯0 , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) ≥ 0. (36) Moreover β¨π’π , π (π₯0 , π₯π )β© + π (π₯0 , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) = − β¨π’π − π’0 , π (π₯π , π₯0 )β© + π (π₯0 , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) + β¨π’0 , π (π₯0 , π₯π )β© ≤ − β¨π’π − π’0 , π (π₯π , π₯0 )β© σ΅© σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© + π (π₯0 , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) + σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π’0 σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯0 , π₯π )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© σ΅© ≤ σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯π , π₯0 )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© ⋅( β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, (34) (37) β¨π’π − π’0 , π (π₯π , π₯0 )β© + π (π₯π , π₯0 ) − π (π₯0 , π₯0 ) σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯, π₯0 )σ΅©σ΅©σ΅© σ΅© σ΅© + σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©π’0 σ΅©σ΅©σ΅©) . Now if βπ₯β = π for all π, we may choose π large enough so that the above inequality and π-coercivity of π with respect to π imply that β¨π’π , π (π₯0 , π₯π )β© + π (π₯0 , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) < 0, (38) which contradicts β¨π’π , π (π₯0 , π₯π )β© + π (π₯0 , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) ≥ 0. (39) International Journal of Analysis 5 Hence there exist π such that βπ₯π β < π. For any π¦ ∈ πΎ, we can choose π > 0 small enough so that π ∈ (0, 1) and π’π + π(π¦ − π₯π ) ∈ πΎ ∩ π΅π . It follows from (ii) that β¨π’π , π (π₯π + π (π¦ − π₯π ) , π₯π )β© + π (π₯π + π (π¦ − π₯π ) , π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) ≥ 0, ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, ∀π’π ∈ π (π₯π ) . (40) By the assumption of π, we have β¨π’π , π (π¦, π₯π )β© + π (π¦, π₯π ) − π (π₯π , π₯π ) ≥ 0, ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, ∀π’π ∈ π (π₯π ) . (41) So π₯π ∈ πΎ is a solution of (16). It is easy to see that weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotonicity implies weakly relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotonicity. So Theorems 12, 13, and 14 are deduced to the following corollaries. ∗ Corollary 15. Suppose that π : πΎ → 2πΈ is π-hemicontinuous and weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotone mapping. Let π : πΎ × πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper convex function and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ be a mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold: (i) π(π₯, π₯) = 0, ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ. (ii) For any fixed π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π(π₯), the mapping π₯ → β¨π’, π(π₯, π¦)β© is convex. (iii) π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) and π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) are convex. Then problems (∗ ∗ ∗) and (∗ ∗ ∗∗) are equivalent as follows: Corollary 17. Let πΎ be a nonempty unbounded closed convex subset of a real reflexive Banach space πΈ and πΈ∗ the dual space ∗ of πΈ. Suppose that π : πΎ → 2πΈ is an π-hemicontinuous and weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotone mapping. Let π : πΎ × πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper convex lower semicontinuous function and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ be a mapping. Assume that (i) π(π₯, π¦) + π(π¦, π₯) = 0, ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ, (ii) for any fixed π¦ ∈ πΎ and π’ ∈ π(π₯) the mapping π₯ σ³¨→ β¨π’, π(π¦, π₯)β© is convex and lower semicontinuous function, (iii) π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) and π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) are convex and lower semicontinuous, (iv) πΌ : πΈ → R is weakly lower semicontinuous, (v) π is π-coercive with respect to π; that is, there exist π₯0 ∈ πΎ such that β¨π’ − π’0 , π (π₯, π₯0 )β© + π (π₯, π₯0 ) − π (π₯0 , π₯0 ) σ³¨→ +∞, (42) σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅© σ΅©σ΅©π (π₯, π₯0 )σ΅©σ΅© whenever βπ₯β → ∞. Then problem (16) is solvable. Remark 18. Theorems 12, 13, and 14, improve Theorems 11, 12, and 15 of results of Kutbi and Sintunavarat [15] and also Fang and Huang [4]. These results are also the extensions of the known results of Bai et al. [1] and Hartman and Stampacchia [7] and corresponding results of Goeleven and Motreanu [5], B. S. Lee and B. D. Lee [12], Siddiqi et al. [8], and Verma [9]. Find π₯ ∈ πΎ such that β¨π’, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ 0, (∗ ∗ ∗) Competing Interests The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper. ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, π’ ∈ π (π₯) , Find π₯ ∈ πΎ such that β¨V, π (π¦, π₯)β© + π (π¦, π₯) − π (π₯, π₯) ≥ πΌ (π¦ − π₯) , (∗ ∗ ∗∗) ∀π¦ ∈ πΎ, V ∈ π (π¦) . Corollary 16. Let πΎ be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a real reflexive Banach space πΈ and πΈ∗ the dual space ∗ of πΈ. Suppose that π : πΎ → 2πΈ is an π-hemicontinuous and weakly relaxed π-πΌ monotone mapping. Let π : πΎ × πΎ → R β{+∞} be a proper convex lower semicontinuous function and π : πΎ × πΎ → πΈ be a mapping. Assume that (i) π(π₯, π¦) + π(π¦, π₯) = 0, ∀π₯ ∈ πΎ, (ii) for any fixed π¦ ∈ πΎ and π’ ∈ π(π₯) the mapping π₯ σ³¨→ β¨π’, π(π¦, π₯)β© is convex and lower semicontinuous function, (iii) π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) and π₯ → π(π₯, ⋅) are convex and lower semicontinuous, (iv) πΌ : πΈ → R is weakly lower semicontinuous; that is, for any net {π₯π½ }, π₯π½ converges to π₯ in π(πΈ, πΈ∗ ) implying that πΌ(π₯) ≤ lim inf πΌ(π₯π½ ). Then problem (17) is solvable. References [1] M.-R. Bai, S.-Z. Zhou, and G.-Y. Ni, “Variational-like inequalities with relaxed π-πΌ pseudomonotone mappings in Banach spaces,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 547–554, 2006. [2] L. C. Ceng and J. C. Yao, “On generalized variational-like inequalities with generalized monotone multivalued mappings,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 428–434, 2009. [3] R. W. Cottle and J. C. Yao, “Pseudo-monotone complementarity problems in Hilbert space,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 281–295, 1992. [4] Y. P. Fang and N. J. Huang, “Variational-like inequalities with generalized monotone mappings in Banach spaces,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 327– 338, 2003. [5] D. Goeleven and D. Motreanu, “Eigenvalue and dynamic problems for variational and hemivariational inequalities,” Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–21, 1996. [6] N. Hadjisavvas and S. Schaible, “Quasimonotone variational inequalities in Banach spaces,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 95–111, 1996. 6 [7] P. Hartman and G. Stampacchia, “On some non-linear elliptic differential-functional equations,” Acta Mathematica, vol. 115, pp. 271–310, 1966. [8] A. H. Siddiqi, Q. H. Ansari, and K. R. Kazmi, “On nonlinear variational inequalities,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 969–973, 1994. [9] R. U. Verma, “On generalized variational inequalities involving relaxed Lipschitz and relaxed monotone operators,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 387– 392, 1997. [10] R. U. Verma, “Nonlinear variational inequalities on convex subsets of Banach spaces,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 25–27, 1997. [11] R. U. Verma, “On monotone nonlinear variational inequality problems,” Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 1998. [12] B. S. Lee and B. D. Lee, “Weakly relaxed πΌ-semi pseudomonotone setvalued variational-like inequalities,” Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education, Series B: Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 231–241, 2004. [13] M. A. Kang, N. J. Huang, and B. S. Lee, “Generalized pseudomonotone setvalued variational-like inequalities,” Indian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 251–264, 2003. [14] W. Sintunavarat, “Mixed equilibrium problems with weakly relaxed πΌ-monotone bifunction in banach spaces,” Journal of Function Spaces and Applications, vol. 2013, Article ID 374268, 5 pages, 2013. [15] M. A. Kutbi and W. Sintunavarat, “On the solution existence of variational-like inequalities problem for weakly relaxed π − πΌ monotone mapping,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 207845, 8 pages, 2013. [16] B. Knaster, C. Kuratowski, and S. Mazurkiewicz, “Ein Beweis des Fixpunktsatzes fur n-dimensionale Simplexe,” Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 1929. [17] J. C. Yao, “Existence of generalized variational inequalities,” Operations Research Letters, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1994. [18] X. Q. Yang and G. Y. Chen, “A class of nonconvex functions and pre-variational inequalities,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 359–373, 1992. [19] K. Fan, “A generalization of Tychonoff ’s fixed point theorem,” Mathematische Annalen, vol. 142, pp. 305–310, 1961. International Journal of Analysis Advances in Operations Research Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in Decision Sciences Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Applied Mathematics Algebra Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Probability and Statistics Volume 2014 The Scientific World Journal Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Differential Equations Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Submit your manuscripts at http://www.hindawi.com International Journal of Advances in Combinatorics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Mathematical Physics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Journal of Complex Analysis Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences Mathematical Problems in Engineering Journal of Mathematics Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Discrete Mathematics Journal of Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Journal of Function Spaces Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Abstract and Applied Analysis Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 International Journal of Journal of Stochastic Analysis Optimization Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Volume 2014