CONCERNS IN CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Transient Response

advertisement
ELEC 304
1
CONCERNS IN CONTROL SYSTEM
DESIGN
!! Transient Response
"! Speed of the Response
"! Overshoot Level
!! Stability
!! Steady-State Response
ELEC 304
2
WE NOW ADDRESS STABILITY
•! The output is
For a system to be stable:
ZIR shouldn!t grow
ZSR shouldn!t grow
1
3
ELEC 304
STABILITY
Based on ZIR (Initial conditions should not produce
a growing response)
#! Only left hand plane poles: System is stable
#!Some right hand plane poles: System is unstable
#! Left hand plane poles and imaginary axis poles
(with multiplicity 1): System is marginally stable
#! Some imaginary axis poles with multiplicity
greater than 1: System is unstable
4
ELEC 304
STABILITY (Based on ZSR)
BIBO Stability
All Bounded (magnitude) Inputs should have
Bounded Outputs.
#! Only left hand plane poles: System is Stable
#! Otherwise: System is Unstable
2
ELEC 304
5
Given the Transfer Function
Figure out whether it is a stable
system or not?
Equivalent question= where are the
poles located?
6
ELEC 304
ROUTH TABLE
•! We use Routh table to determine whether
there exists any unstable poles?
•! So what is a Routh table?
3
7
ELEC 304
Suppose we are interested in the roots of the
polynomial
a4s4+a3s3+a2s2+a1s1+a0
Initial layout for
Routh table
8
ELEC 304
Completed
Routh table
4
ELEC 304
9
Routh Hurwitz Method.htm
Slide 4
10
EXAMPLE
ELEC 304
5
ELEC 304
11
Special Case 1: Routh Table Containing
a zero in the first column
T(s)=10/(s5+2s4+3s3+6s2+5s+3)
12
ELEC 304
Special Case 2: Routh Table Containing all
zeros in a row
Example: T(s)=10/(s5+7s4+6s3+42s2+8s+56)
6
13
ELEC 304
Root positions
to generate
even
polynomials:
A , B, C,
or any
combination
14
ELEC 304
Example: T(s)=20/(s8+s7+12s6+22s5+39s4+59s3+48s2+38s+20)
7
15
ELEC 304
16
ELEC 304
Stability Design Via Routh-Hurwitz
8
17
ELEC 304
18
ELEC 304
9
19
ELEC 304
Routh table for antenna control
case study .
Conclusion: 0<K<2623
10
Download