Evaluation of Rotor Speed Stability Margin of a Constant Speed Wind Turbine Generator Mital G. Kanabar, Student Member, IEEE, and S. A. Khaparde, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract-Many developing countries like India have installed large number of constant speed wind turbine generators (WTGs) as they are robust and economical. Most of the countries have their own grid codes (rules and regulations) to integrate WTGs into the utility grid. One of the primary grid code for WTGs is low voltage ride through (LVRT) capability. The regulations of grid integration are likely to make LVRT requirements mandatory for WTGs with high penetration level. To demonstrate LVRT capability, a WTG has to remain connected to the grid at a specific low voltage and for a specific duration. Generally, a constant speed WTG does not satisfy LVRT requirements. This is because during a nearby fault, the rotor accelerates to a very high speed, and hence the WTG becomes unstable. This phenomenon is referred to as rotor speed instability. To satisfy LVRT requirements, the rotor speed stability margin of a constant speed WTG has to be improved. One of the methods to meet the LVRT requirements is by providing additional reactive power support which can improve the terminal voltage during a disturbance. This, in turn, will increase the electromagnetic torque and hence, the rotor acceleration can be reduced. This paper presents an evaluation of rotor speed stability margin to obtain critical slip and critical clearing time of a constant speed wind turbine generator. For this analysis, analytical formulae have been presented to determine the exact amount of additional reactive power support required to meet the LVRT capabilities. For a sample system, using simulation of the dynamic model in SIMULINK, it has been shown that the analytical value of reactive power is indeed able to make the WTG comply with the LVRT requirements. Index Terms- Constant speed (squirrel cage) induction generators, grid codes, rotor speed stability, wind turbine generating system. I. INTRODUCTION MONG all renewable resources, wind power is the /A most booming renewable technology all over the world. Further, India ranks fourth in the world with a total installed capacity of more than 7, 311 MW by the end of March, 2007 [1]. Most of the wind turbine generators (WTGs) installed in India are constant speed (squirrel cage) induction generators. This is because of their robustness, mechanical simplicity and low price. However, a constant speed WTG always demands reactive power, hence reactive Mital G. Kanabar is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India - 400076 e-mail: (mital.kanabar@gmail.com). S. A. Khaparde is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India - 400076 e-mail: (sak@ee.iitb.ac.in). 978-1-4244-1762-9/08/$25.00 2008 IEEE 1.1 1.1 .S. [ Wind plant required to remain Online 0 :.. C) a) 0.8 0.7 0 C-) a) I.. 0 '6" 0.5 1 0.4 v/ 0.3 a) 0. cd a) .ot ct ;t.0 Wind plan t Not required to remain Online 0 0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.15 0.625 - - 1.0 - - 2.0 Time (sec) WECC Standard AWEA Standard 3.0 4.0 Fig. 1. LVRT requirements for wind generation facilities. power compensation is needed. During a grid disturbance near to a WTG, severe voltage sag in the connecting network may cause a significant reduction in active power generation and rise in rotor speed. After voltage recovery, the rotor speed of the induction generator may be so high that it does not return to the prefault value. This may lead to rotor speed stability problem [2]. According to [2], rotor speed stability refers to the ability of an induction (asynchronous) machine to remain connected to the electric power system and running at a mechanical speed close to the speed corresponding to the actual system frequency after being subjected to a disturbance. As the penetration level of constant speed WTGs increases, it is critical to maintain the rotor speed stability during low voltage at point of common coupling (PCC). This is referred to as low voltage ride through (LVRT) capability of a WTG. Normally, LVRT requirements are stringent in regions with high penetration of wind power [3], [4]. AWEA recommended adoption of an LVRT requirement developed by E.ON Netz as shown in Fig. 1, if required, on a case-by-case basis. WECC (Western Electricity Coordinating Council) has put effort to lenient this stringent requirement in May 2005, and revised that machine should stay connected for 15% of nominal per unit of terminal voltage for approximately 0.15 s [3]. To understand rotor speed stability for a constant speed WTG, it is necessary to model the dynamics of the wind turbine and generating system connected to the grid. Detailed dynamic modeling equations for a constant speed (squirrel jX1 Infinite Bus JX, jXtr Constant jXs jxtr Speed WTG IG Capacitor Banks rrI s -jxc Fig. 3. Equivalent circuit diagram of a sample system. Fig. 2. Single line diagram of a sample system. cage) induction generation have been described in [5]. References [6], [7] have presented a dynamic model of a wind turbine for power system analysis. An analysis of rotor speed stability has been carried out in [8], in which, active stall control strategy has been presented to enhance the B rotor speed stability of a constant speed WTG. The study of transient stability of a constant speed WTG using dynamic Fig. 4. Thevenin's equivalent circuit. simulation has been presented in [9], [10]. rr S Reference [12] examines the response of a constant speed WTG during faults and the possible impacts on the system stability when the percentage of wind generation increases. In [13], Salman etal. have investigated the factors that influence the dynamic behavior of a WTG following network fault conditions. Using this technique, torque-time characteristic of the WTG has been obtained to determine the critical clearing time. In [14], [15], Senjyu etal. have demonstrated the control of terminal voltage and power factor of a constant speed WTG with shunt capacitor banks. The dynamic behavior of a constant speed WTG with shunt capacitor banks has been reported in [16]. To calculate the exact amount of reactive power support required to satisfy the LVRT requirement, it is necessary to obtain a relation between the critical slip (scr) and the reactive power support in steady state Let us consider the steady-state equivalent model of a constant speed induction generator as shown in Fig. 3. In this figure, rl and Xl are the line resistance and reactance respectively; Xtr is the transformer reactance; Xc is the capacitive reactance; rs and Xs are the stator resistance and reactance respectively; Xm is the magnetizing reactance; r, and Xr are the rotor resistance and reactance referred to the stator side respectively and s is the rotor slip. All these above quantities are in per unit. This paper contributes towards quantification of additional reactive power support necessary to satisfy LVRT requirements for the existing constant speed WTGs. To satisfy LVRT requirements of a constant speed WTG, the rotor speed stability margin has to be improved. To evaluate rotor speed stability margin, the formulae for critical slip and critical clearing time have been obtained analytically. To obtain the torque-slip characteristics of a constant speed WTG, a Thevenin equivalent that has been derived across points A and B for the circuit in Fig. 3 is shown in Fig. 4. The organization of this paper is as follows. In section 2, steady state analysis of a constant speed WTG has been described. In this section, formula for critical slip has been obtained from torque-speed characteristic of a constant speed WTG. The calculations of critical clearing time has been detailed in section 3. Simulation results of a constant speed WTG with capacitor bank connected to the sample system have been discussed in section 4. Section 5 concludes the paper. The formula to calculate the Thevenin's voltage is indicated below: VXCXTm + Vt h (rl + jXt)[rs + j(Xsm -Xc)1 XCXsm -jXcrs where, Xlt = Xl + Xt, Xsm = Xs + Xm The values of the Thevenin resistance (rth) and Thevenin reactance (Xth) are obtained as follows: 'rth = II. STEADY STATE ANALYSIS OF A CONSTANT SPEED WTG Fig. 2 shows a single line diagram of a sample system with a constant speed WTG and capacitor banks connected to an infinite bus through a step-up power transformer. Xth= where, a c+b d 2+ bc-ad (2) (3) A. Evaluation of Critical Slip As shown in Fig. 5, the critical slip can be obtained by equating the electrical torque of the WTG with its mechanical torque. From (4), 01) Vth 2 . rr -TM [>r +rth]2 + [XI+Xth]2 (5) This leads to, -Scr -So Slip (p.u.) Vth 2 ____ Fig. 5. Tm Torque-slip characteristic of a constant speed WTG. /I ' T.r S = (r S I )22 + 2rth rth +(Xr + Xth) (6) S Finally, Bc a = = 1= Total susceptance of the capacitor banks [r2h+(X+Xth)2].s2+[2rthrr-rr'VtTmh2 I Bc[XsXtXm - rsrXm] - Xm(Xs + Xlt) =-Bc[riXsXm c =-Bc[r,X,m + r,Xlt] + rs + r, = 0 (7) This is a quadratic equation in 's', and following are its roots (scr,s3) (as shown in Fig. 5) + rsXitXm] + Xm(rs + ri) b s+(r;)2 Equation (8) (in next page) shows that s,. is mainly a function of the parameters such as rth, Xth and Vth. The value of these parameters also depends on Bc (the amount of reactive power compensation in per unit). d = Bc [rsrl - XitXsm] + Xs +X + X+lt From Fig. 4, the electromagnetic torque (in p.u.) of a constant speed WTG can be determined as follows: III. CALCULATION OF CRITICAL CLEARING TIME Vh 12 [>r + rth ]2 + . rr S [XI +Xth1]2 (4) Using (4), the torque versus slip characteristic has been obtained, and is shown in Fig. 5. In the normal operating condition, the electromagnetic and mechanical torques will be equal; hence, the WTG will operate at slip so (point Q). When a severe fault occurs close to the WTG, the terminal voltage of the WTG falls drastically. This will reduce the electrical torque to almost zero. Consequently, the rotor will oscillate, and the slip of the WTG will increase gradually. Once the fault is cleared, the terminal voltage and electrical torque will again increase to its nominal value and thereby, the rotor will decelerate. If the fault is cleared after the critical clearing time (ter), the rotor may accelerate to a higher than critical slip (scr) value. In this case, although the fault is cleared and the terminal voltage is recovered, the rotor will continue to accelerate (beyond scr), and therefore, the WTG will enter the unstable region. This phenomenon implies that if the rotor slip crosses the point P (as shown in Fig. 5), the WTG will get disconnected from the grid due to over-speed protection. In practice, over-speed protection circuit disconnects the WTG from the grid when the speed of the WTG exceeds 1.2 p.u. Let us consider rotor dynamics to obtain the critical clearing time, Tm-Te ds dt (10) 2H where, s is the slip in p.u., Tm is the mechanical torque in p.u., Te is the electromagnetic torque in p.u., H is the combined inertia constant of the WTG system in sec. Integration of (10) leads to, Jter dt 2H dt m - e Jscrd s (1 1) It has been assumed that during the fault Tm - Te remains approximately constant. Finally, tcr = IH (Scr - So) - Te m (12) From (12), it can be observed that the critical clearing time is directly proportional to the inertia constant and the difference of the critical and initial slip, and inversely proportional to the difference between the mechanical and electromagnetic torque. Ilr - rIr -[2rthrr-rr Scr 2[rt2h + (XI and, -[It 1 sO +hl2 ] + -[2rthr-r = -[2rthT-/ r. 2122 4(r )2 [r2h + (XI + Xth)21 + Xth)2] rliV ,2 -4r)2r ]'-[2rthrrrTl ]2-4r)2[rh+ 2[rt2h + (XI + Xth)2] (8) 2 (XI +Xth)21 (9) TABLE I PARAMETERS OF A CONSTANT SPEED WTG Parameters Value Rated Power Rated Phase Voltage Rated Frequency Number of Poles Stator Resistance (r,) Stator Leakage Reactance (X18) Rotor Resistance (re) Rotor Leakage Reactance (X;r) Magnetizing Reactance (Xm) Inertia constant (J) 600 kW 690 V 50 Hz 4 0.016 p.u. 0.15 p.u. 0.01 p.u. 0. 11 p.U. 7.28 p.u. 18.029 kg.m2 IV. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Modeling of the constant speed WTG, capacitor banks and grid has been carried out using MATLAB/SIMULINK software tool. Currents from the WTG have been added to the currents from the capacitor banks. The total current is then injected into the grid. From this injected current, the terminal voltage is calculated which is then given as an input to the WTG and capacitor banks. As shown in Fig. 2, a 600 kW constant speed WTG with capacitor bank is simulated using MATLAB/SIMULINK. Dynamic model of this 600kW constant speed WTG is same as given in reference [5]. The network transients are neglected. The machine parameters are listed in table I [15]. This WTG is stall controlled (Type Ao) and hence, it does not possess blade-pitch control. - A. Effect of Additional Reactive Power Support With the help of simulation, it has been shown that this 600 kW constant speed WTG does not comply with the LVRT requirements (as shown in Fig. 8). Hence, the WTG has to be disconnected from the grid due to rotor speed instability whenever a fault occurs in its vicinity. However, by providing additional reactive power support, rotor speed stability of the WTG can be enhanced such that it can satisfy the LVRT requirements. This phenomenon has been discussed in this section with the help of simulation results. Further, the exact quantification of reactive support required to achieve particular values of critical slip and critical clearing time has been obtained theoretically. Finally, using the dynamic model of the system, it has been shown that dynamic simulation results (critical slip and time) match with the analytically calculated results using (8) and (12). Fig. 6. Torque-slip characteristics of the WTG with nominal and additional reactive power. Fig. 6 shows the torque-slip characteristics of a 600 kW WTG with two different value of reactive power injection. Equation (4) shows that the electromagnetic torque is a function of Vth, rth and Xth. For a given set of machine parameters, Vth, rth and Xth are functions of BC (the value of reactive power compensation) as shown in (1), (2) and (3) respectively. For nominal reactive power support, the value of BC is 0.23 p.u., and with an additional capacitor bank of 0.22 p.u., the value of BC will be 0.45 p.u. As indicated in Fig. 6, an additional value of BC will shift the torque-slip characteristic upwards. Consequently, the value of critical slip will increase from -0.118 p.u. to -0.15 p.u. Improvement of sc, because of additional BC can also be obtained numerically using (8). Similarly, using (12), t, has been calculated as 0.12 s with the nominal capacitor bank, and 0.155 s with an additional capacitor bank. The equations for s, and t, (as a function of Bc) have been verified using a dynamic-simulation model of the sample system. A severe three phase-to-ground fault has been created on the system such that the terminal voltage at the constant speed WTG should remain as per LVRT requirements. To consider the worst condition, the wind velocity has been kept constant at its rated value in the simulation. Therefore, the mechanical torque of the turbine will remain at 1 p.u. during the fault. As per LVRT requirements (refer Fig. 1), a WTG should remain stable for 0.15 s with a terminal voltage of 0.15 p.u. This means that to satisfy the LVRT requirement, a WTG should have a critical clearing time of at least 0.15 s. CD=3 2 X-. 0 E -4 E 2 ,2 aD -22 - LL] 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.12 4.5 5 5.5 aD LL] 2 0.9i 2 Time (Sec.) Fig. 7. Electromagnetic torque and rotor speed without additional capacitor bank for a fault of duration 0.12 s. i 4 l lA . -2 0 -4 -r 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.15 4.5 5 2j a 1.8 -o CD CD 3 3.5 4 4.15 4.5 5 5.5 6 4.5 5 5.5 6 , i~~~~ "/ (X)1.4- 3.5 4 .1 Tim(Sec.) 45 3 3.5 4 4.15 Time (Sec.) Fig. 9. Electromagnetic torque and rotor speed with additional capacitor bank for a fault of duration 0.15 s. 6 ~~~/ i 1.6 ° 1.2 5.5.5 2.5 executing the dynamic model again, it has been observed that the WTG remains stable even for 0.15 s. The rotor accelerates to -0.15 p.u. slip, and after the fault is cleared, the rotor comes back to its nominal value of -0.005 p.u. slip as shown in Fig. 9. Additional capacitor bank remains connected only during transient condition. Further, capacitor bank should be switched on before the critical clearing time of the WTG. 2 0 aD) T -o CD o5 1.00 75 LL] 2.5 .15 CD CD E r -4 0 -b 6 ,1.1 C3 _X r~ H0 TABLE II SUMMARY OF THE RESULTS / Cases 212 Fig. 8. Electromagnetic torque and rotor speed without additional capacitor bank for a fault of duration 0.15 s. Fig. 7 shows the electromagnetic torque and rotor speed in per unit. The fault has been simulated at 4 s such that the terminal voltage of the WTG remains 0.15 p.u (as per LVRT requirements). During the fault, the value of Te will reduce to almost zero. Hence, the rotor will accelerate to -0.11 p.u. slip within 0.12 s. The numerical values of the critical slip and time are calculated to be -0.118 p.u. and 0.12 s from (8) and (12) respectively. If the fault persist for more than the critical clearing time (0.12 s), the rotor will continue to accelerate and the WTG becomes unstable. Fig. 8 shows the electromagnetic torque and rotor speed for a fault of duration 0.15 s. The speed of the WTG ramps up gradually and it has to be disconnected from the grid before the mechanical constraint on the rotor speed (1.2 p.u.) is reached. However, as per LVRT requirements, a constant speed WTG should remain connected for at least 0.15 s, which is not satisfied for this 600 kW WTG with nominal value of reactive power compensation. a To meet the LVRT requirements, an additional capacitor bank has been employed in parallel with the WTG. With this, Nominal reactive power Additional reactive power Analytically scr dynamic simulation (p.u.) (p.u.) -0.118 -0.150 Cases Analytically Nominal reactive power Additional reactive power (sec.) 0.120 0.155 From -0.110 -0.150 tcr From dynamic simulation (sec.) 0.120 0.150 V. CONCLUSIONS To obtain rotor speed stability margin of a constant speed WTG, the analytical formulae for s, and t, are presented. Enhancement of the rotor speed stability margin has been achieved with the help of additional reactive power compensation. Steady state analysis has been carried out to calculate the exact amount of additional reactive power required to satisfy LVRT requirements. This extra reactive power would recover the voltage and hence, the electromagnetic torque. Therefore, the rotor acceleration reduces and the value of tcr increases. Proposed analytical model for the evaluation of Scr and tcr are validated using dynamic simulation results in MATLAB/SIMULINK. Further, it has been shown that with this nominal value of reactive power support (BC=0.23 p.u.), tc, is 0.12 s. However, according to the LVRT requirements, t, should be at least 0.15 s. Therefore, analytically calculated reactive power support of (BC=0.22 p.u.) has been connected additionally. This extra reactive power increases the value of t, to 0.15 s, which is in compliance with the LVRT requirements. From Table II, it can be inferred that analytically calculated values of s, and t, match with those obtained by dynamic simulation. Though the requirements vary according to severity and location of fault, this evaluation would still be applicable to any generic WTG system. REFERENCES [1] (2007). [Online]. Available: http:llwww.windpowerindia.com [2] 0. Samuelsson and S. Lindahl, "On speed stability", IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1179-1180, May 2005. [3] R. Zavadil, N. Miller, A. Ellis, and E. Muljadi, "Making connections", IEEE Power Energy Mag., pp. 26-37, Nov. 2005. [4] "Large scale integration of wind energy in the european power supply: analysis, issues and recommendations", European Wind Energy Association, Tech. Rep., Dec. 2005. [5] P. C. Krause, Analysis of Electric Machinery. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1987. [6] T. Ackermann, Wind Power in Power Systems. England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2005. [7] J. G. Slootweg, H. Polinder, and W. L. Kling, "Initialization of wind turbine models in power system dynamics simulations", in Proc. International Power Tech. Conference, Porto, 2001. [8] M. G. Kanabar, C. V. Dobariya, and S. A. Khaparde, "Rotor Speed Stability Analysis of Constant Speed Wind Turbine Generators", in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems, PEDES, Dec. 2006. [9] P. Ledesma, J. Usaola, and J. L. Rodriguez, "Transient stability of a fixed speed wind farm", Renewable Energy, vol. 28, pp. 1341-1355, May 2003. [10] J. M. Rodriguez, J. L. Fernandez, D. Beato, R. Iturbe, J. Usaola, P. Ledesma, and J. R. Wilhelmi, "Incidence on power system dynamics of high penetration of fixed speed and doubly fed wind energy systems: study of the Spanish case", IEEE Trans. on Power Sytems, vol. 17, pp. 1089 - 1095, Nov. 2002. [11] W. Freitas, J. C. M. Vieira, A. Morelato, L. C. P. da Silva, V. F. da Costa, and F. A. B. Lemos, "Comparative analysis between synchronous and induction machines for distributed generation applications", IEEE Trans. on Power Sytems, vol. 21, pp. 301 - 311, Feb. 2006. [12] C. Chompoo-inwai, C. Yingvivatanapong, K. Methaprayoon, and W. J. Lee, "Reactive compensation techniques to improve the ride-through capability of wind turbine during disturbance", IEEE Trans. on Industry Applications, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 666-672, May 2005. [13] S. K. Salman and A. L. J. Teo, "Windmill modeling consideration and factors influencing the stability of a grid-connected wind power-based embedded generator", IEEE Trans. on Power Sytems, vol. 18, pp. 793802, May 2003. [14] T. Senjyu, R. Kuninaka, N. Urasaki, Y. Miyazato, H. Fujita, and T. Funabashi, "Enhancement of stable operation for induction generators in wind form", in Proc. Power Engineering Conference, IPEC, Nov. 2005. [15] T. Senjyu, N. Sueyoshi, R. Kuninaka, K. Uezato, H. Fujita, and T. Funabashi, "Study on terminal voltage and power factor control of induction generator for wind power generation system", in Proc. IEEE Power System Technology, POWERCON, Nov. 2004, pp. 753-758. [16] K. C. Divya and P. S. N. Rao, "Study of dynamic behavior of grid connected induction generators", in Proc. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, vol. 2, 2004, pp. 2200 - 2205.