Electricity and Magnetism From Parlor Games to Maxwell’s Equations Electrical children, 1748 E & M as “finalized” physics Four “moments” in any topic of physics – – – – Identify the relevant phenomena Quantity relevant aspects of phenomena Create explanatory theories Apply the theories in technology Most areas of classical physics not finalized as quickly as E & M – Heat, light, energy all slow to be “finalized” – Laws of motion, astronomy (celestial mechanics) “finalized” more quickly Task of lecture Pre-sciences of electricity and magnetism-separate phenomena 18th-century phenomena and theories Marriage of E & M in 19th century Field theories Mathematical descriptions An aether returns! A European network of researchers involved E & M--unrelated phenomena Electrum = amber in Greek – Attractive quality, ignored by Aristotle – Named “electric” by Gilbert in 1600 Magnesia = Turkish area rich in iron – Compass invented in 4th-century China Technology without any theoretical explanation Gilbert’s De magnete, 1600 – Experiments showed E and M unrelated Amber draws many bodies, magnet only iron Amber draws only light bodies, magnet heavy bodies – Offered two separate theories (Aristotelian language) “Innate sympathy” for magnets (special powers) “Effluvia” for electricity (moist particles released by rubbing attract dry particles in bodies) 18th-century electrostatics The apparatus Glass and amber rods Electric machines Leyden jars--a “terrible instrument” discovered by accident in 1746 The phenomena Attraction and repulsion made more visible Conductors and insulators Sparks and shocks Lightning as electricity – First known research death in physics, 1753 18th-century theories 2-fluid theory (Dufay, Nollet), 1740s – Fluids flow in both directions, toward (paper bits) and away (sparks) from “electrics” – Opposites attract; likes repel 1-fluid theory (Franklin), 1746 – Electric fluid repels itself, attracts ordinary matter, is CONSERVED – All ordinary matter contains some electric fluid – Surplus or lack of electric fluid, created by rubbing, produces phenomena No closure on this debate in 18c Phenomena generally not quantified Some phenomena ignored, others stressed On-going disagreement over shape of lightning rods Electroscope action as example 2 fluids 1 fluid Like charges repel Electric fluid repels itself Opposites attract Ordinary matter has Ordinary matter has some electric fluid + and - charge + + - - - Glass rod + _ + + + + + Both theories + explain the + + + phenomenon! + Quantification of electrostatics Quantity of charge (Q) – Quantified with electroscope, first electrical phenomenon to be so Intensity of charge (T=tension) – Length of sparks, length of wire melted (Leyden jar) Force (Fe) measured by Coulomb in 1785 – Coulomb’s Law: Fe = kc Q1Q2/R2 Form analogous to Newton’s law of gravity! – Coulomb = measure of charge (a big unit) – Electrical forces in atoms much stronger than gravitational forces Fe is 1041 > Fg, between proton and electron in hydrogen atom Current electricity discovered Galvani’s accidental discovery of “animal electricity,” 1791 in Bologna Muscle twitches when: – Scalpel on nerve and electric machine sparks – Muscle hung on iron fence with brass hook – Muscle placed in iron-zinc arc Concluded that animals generate a special electricity, with muscles acting like Leyden jars Volta’s battery, 1800 in Pavia – Rejects “animal electricity”; claims that muscle is a detector, not a generator, of electricity – Electricity produced by 2 dissimilar metals in contact – Zinc-silver-cardboard “piles” worked best – Electric potential pushes charge in circuit Current electricity exploited Technological applications by 1805 – Carbon arcs in circuit produce light – Decomposition of chemical compounds (hydrogen from water, chlorine gas from saltwater) Competing theories of “current” in pile Shifts in electrical studies ca. 1800 – – – – From parlor to factory From qualitative to quantitative laws Linked to heat, light, muscle action Boundaries still fluid (animal magnetism) Marriage of E & M in 1820s Oersted’s non-accidental discovery of electromagnetism, 1820 in Copenhagen – Moving current in wire makes magnetism – Hypothesized “circular force” in space (not central force like gravity!) Ampere’s electromagnet, 1820 in Paris – Theorizes magnet as current loops in atoms, reducing magnetism to electricity N N S S Faraday’s research, 1820-50 First “professional” physicist we have discussed in Physics 1 Self-taught at evening science lectures Full-time employee of Royal Institution from 1813 Visual thinker, not a mathematician Electromagnetism makes motion, 1821 Mercury-magnetic motor Electric motor with electromagnet as armature (also a galvanometer!) Faraday’s motors Bar magnets N S Electromagnet with changing polarity - N S + Battery Principle of the galvanometer, a new electromagnetic instrument! Electromagnetic induction Magnetism makes electricity, 1831 Theory-driven: magnet causes “electrotonic strain” in conductor or medium Moving bar magnet makes electricity Electromagnet turned on/off makes electricity Invents dynamo, 1830s Mechanical work rotates electromagnet which generates electric current Faraday’s field theory, 1838 New conceptual tools: “strained” space – Object (A) generates field throughout space – Field of (A) exerts force on charged test element (q) placed in field A + Fe q Electric field, E = Fe/q E has direction! + + - Faraday’s field theory, cont. Magnetic fields, named B Exist wherever force of magnetic origin is exerted on a test magnet (have direction) N S Thus, a field defines properties of space! Maxwell’s unification of E&M 1st prof exp. physics, Cambridge 1871 Unified math description of E, B fields produced by given currents and charges, with 4 equations Summarized many experimental results – – – – – – – Coulomb’s law and idea of E fields Changing E field produces B fields No free magnetic charges (no free poles) Electric charge is conserved Changing B field produce E fields Forces between current-carrying wires Light moves at speed of c (300,000,000 m/sec) Maxwell’s aether Electric current flows from A to B; rotating cells represent magnetic field; rotating spheres flow of electricity Heuristic model, not Cartesian ontology