FSA 16/05/12
FSA Board Business Committee
Performance & Resources report
May 2016
2015/16 Quarter four results and forecast
Level 1: Outcomes – Shared responsibility
(businesses, FSA, consumers)
Level 2: FSA Performance (outputs)
Level 3: FSA Efficiency & Resources
1
Level
Contents
Page
1
Human cases of Foodborne Disease
4
1
Campylobacter in Chicken Retail Survey
5
1
Public awareness, trust and reputation of FSA
6
1
Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme
7
1
Consumer awareness – FHRS
8
1
Shellfish Hygiene
9
1
Meat Food Business Operator compliance with regulations
10
1
Meat Inspection:
Contamination identified at final FBO inspection point
11
2
Meat Inspection:
Accuracy assessment of FSA team carrying out post-mortem inspection
12
1
Animal Welfare
13
1
Incidents
14
1
Food Allergy and Food Intolerance / Coeliac Disease (annual)
15
2
FSA Change Portfolio
16
2
Level
FSA Efficiency & Resources
Page
3
Organisational Development
17
3
Resources used: FSA 15/16 Net expenditure (excluding AME) £m and Staffing FTEs
18
3
Analysis of Official Controls and Science, Research & LA Support
- FSA Programme spend
19
3
Financial Performance Forecast
20
3
Efficiency – Spending Review Trend
21
3
FSA Estates (annual)
22
3
FSA Sustainability (annual)
23
3
Level 1: Food is safe - Human cases of Foodborne Disease
It is the responsibility of people producing and supplying food to ensure it is safe and what it says it is. It’s estimated 1 million
people are affected by Foodborne Disease in UK costing the economy c£1bn. Laboratory confirmed human cases in the UK 2000
to 2015 of the four major bacterial pathogens are shown. Only a minority of cases are reported and samples sent for lab analysis.
1,600
70,000
UK lab-confirmed cases
UK lab-confirmed cases
80,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
Campylobacter
1,400
1,200
1,000
400
200
Escherichia coli O157
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Year
Year
300
UK lab-confirmed cases
UK lab-confirmed cases
600
0
0
20,000
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
800
Salmonella
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Year
250
200
150
100
50
Listeria monocytogenes
0
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Year
Systems reporting foodborne disease cases generally stabilise 3 months after the end of the reporting period, but, due to changes in reporting
systems for foodborne disease in England, the figures are taking longer to stabilise than expected and the 2015 data remains subject to
change. The changes to PHEs reporting systems are to improve how , for example, lab reports are summited and removing potential
duplication of samples from the same person. Further clarification will be reported in subsequent reports.
Source: Public Health England, Public Health Wales, Health Protection Scotland and Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland
4
Level 1: Campylobacter in Chicken Retail Survey
The FSA has a multi-year programme of work to promote industry and consumer change to reduce campylobacter. This work
includes undertaking a microbiological survey of campylobacter contamination in fresh whole UK produced chilled chickens at
retail sale. As a result of the retail survey, several retailers are now taking enhanced action and publicising their intentions.
25
20
% chicken skin samples Over 1000
cfu/g Campylobacter
21.7
1/3
Reduction
15
18.9
2/5
Reduction
14.9
10
10.7
5
0
July-Sept
Oct to Dec
2014
2015
The level of Campylobacter contamination on chicken skin is measured in terms of the number of colony forming units per gram of skin (cfu/g).
The primary focus of attention is on levels of Campylobacter over 1000 cfu/g. There was a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of
chickens (skin samples) with high levels of Campylobacter from 18.9% in Oct-Dec 2014 to 10.7% in Oct-Dec 2015.
The prevalence of highly contaminated chickens has been significantly lower than the same time the previous year for both quarters of the current
survey. Industry as a whole did not meet the target they had jointly agreed with the FSA to reduce the proportion of whole fresh chicken that were
most heavily contaminated with Campylobacter to less than 10%, measured at the end of processing, by the end of 2015. However, the FSA has
continued to press retailers and suppliers to meet this target at the earliest subsequent opportunity.
5
Level 1: Public awareness, trust and reputation of FSA
100%
Public Awareness of FSA
FSA’s Reputation
100
80%
80
60%
60
40%
40
20%
20
0%
0
64.6
Apr-14
72.8
73.2
71.1
Oct-14
Mar-15
Nov/Dec-15
100
80
Trust in the FSA
100%
80%
71.1
62.7
60
I neither trust nor distrust it
Net: Trust
Net: Distrust
60%
40%
20%
0%
Base: All respondents aware of the FSA, W11: England, Northern Ireland and Wales, W1-11: Weighted
base (W11: 1354, W1 - W10: 737 - 1507), Unweighted base (W11: 1445 W1 - W9: 758- 1670)
40
20
0
Food Standards Agency (FSA)
UK public sector average
FSA’s reputation continues to be significantly ahead
of the UK public sector average
(+8.6, up from +7.5 in the last report)
Trust has significantly increased from Nov 2013 –
the time of the horsemeat incident. 65% of those
aware of the FSA also trust the Agency to do its job
– no change from the last report.
6
Level 1: Food is safe - Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme
FHRS is operated in partnership with local authorities in England, Northern Ireland and Wales. Ratings range from 5 (‘Very
good’) to 0 (‘Urgent improvement necessary’). Ratings visits are carried out by Local Authorities.
% of FHRS all countries
% of FHRS 5 Ratings
80
100%
1pp increase
(to 62.2% since
Dec 2015)
% of rated businesses
75
80%
60%
70
65
60
55
50
45
40%
Mar-16
Dec-15
Sep-15
Jun-15
Mar-15
Dec-14
0.2pp increase
(to 93.6% since
Dec 2015)
85
England
N Ireland
Wales
7
Mar-16
Dec-15
Sep-15
Jun-15
Mar-15
80
Dec-14
Percentage point (pp) increases in ‘5 – very good’ and ‘3 or better’
ratings are consistent with increases seen in previous quarters.
Sectors with the highest proportion of ‘3 or better’ ratings are Schools
/ colleges (99.3%) and Hospitals/childcare/caring premises (98.6%).
Take-aways continue to have the lowest proportion at 85.2% but this
is an improving picture, up 1.6 pp from a level of 83.7% a year ago
(March 2015). All other sectors have over 90% of ratings of
‘3 or better’.
90
Sep-14
0 - Urgent improvement necessary
Jun-14
•
1 - Major improvement necessary
Mar-14
•
2 - Improvement necessary
95
Dec-13
•
3 - Generally satisfactory
% of rated businesses
100
4 - Good
Sep-14
% of FHRS Ratings 3 and above
0%
5 - Very good
Jun-14
20%
Mar-14
Dec-13
40
Level 1: Consumer awareness - FHRS
% consumers believing / accepting FSA’s
messages (overall and not limited to FHRS)
Consumer use of FHRS ratings website (food.gov.uk/ratings)
1
100%
Millions
0.8
80%
0.6
60%
0.4
40%
0.2
46%
42%
42%
Oct-14
Mar-15
Nov/Dec-15
26%
20%
0
Q2 14/15
Q3 14/15
Q4 14/15
Q1 15/16
Unique visits
Q2 15/16
Q3 15/16
Q4 15/16
0%
Apr-14
Total visits
Ways consumers report knowing about the hygiene standards of places they eat
at or buy food from (Nov 2010 – Nov 2015)
100%
80%
Recognition of FHRS
(public attitudes tracker Nov 2015)
Proportion of respondents who reported that they had
seen or heard of FHRS when shown the name ‘Food
Hygiene Rating Scheme’ (up from 34%)
100%
60%
40%
80%
20%
60%
0%
Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3 Wave 4 Wave 5 Wave 6 Wave 7 Wave 8 Wave 9 Wave 10 Wave 11
(Nov 10) (May (Nov 11) (May (Nov 12) (May (Nov 13) (May (Nov 14) (May (Nov 15)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
General appearance of premises
Hygiene certificate
Appearance of staff
Hygiene sticker
The proportion of respondents who report using hygiene stickers (36%) as a
method of knowing about hygiene standards has not changed significantly from
the previous wave (35%) but have increased compared with waves 1-8(12-30%).
40%
20%
0%
Nov-14
May-15
Nov-15
8
Level 2: Food is safe - Shellfish hygiene
Shellfish production areas are classified according to the extent to which shellfish sampled from the area are contaminated with E coli. The
classification determines the treatment required before harvested molluscs can be placed on the market. In England and Wales shellfish
samples are taken by local authorities and in Northern Ireland by contractor, local authority or the Loughs Agency.
Bed closures and prohibitions excl.
voluntary closures
Bed Classifications
350
300
10
250
8
200
6
150
4
100
50
2
0
0
A
B
C
De
A
B
C
De
A
B
C
De
A
B
C
De
As at end of Jun As at end of Sep As at end of Dec As at end of Mar
2015
2015
2015
2016
The charts show the number of shellfish beds in England,
Wales and Northern Ireland and corresponding closures
or prohibitions of these beds in 2015/16
600
500
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb March
2014-15
0
1
8
2
4
2
0
1
0
0
3
0
2015-16
1
1
2
9
3
1
2
10
0
0
0
2
Number of samples analysed
400
-
Class A - harvested for direct human consumption
-
Class B - human consumption after purification /
relaying in an approved area / approved heat treatment
-
Class C - human consumption only after relaying in an
approved area for at least two months / by treatment
in a purification centre / after approved heat treatment
-
Declassified beds - sites that are currently not being
harvested, but continued to be monitored to allow reclassification if required
300
200
100
0
Phytoplankton (Water) tests
Toxin (flesh) tests
9
Microbial (E.coli) tests
Level 1: Food is safe – Meat Food Business
Operator compliance with regulations
It is the responsibility of food business operators to comply with regulations. In addition to routine official controls and inspections, the FSA
carries out audits to verify compliance and works with FBOs to identify where improvements are necessary. Where an audit finds that a food
business operator is non-compliant with regulations, urgent improvement is necessary.
60
England, Wales & Northern Ireland since Aug 2015
England
900
800
0
20
1
21
2
16
1
22
3
19
3
16
0
18
0
22
No of Establishments
20%
Wales
increase in
establishments
achieving ‘Good’
388
363
357
356
347
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
3
37
38
38
38
38
39
36
34
30
16
17
17
18
19
19
21
22
20
0
334
Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16 Mar-16
Northern Ireland
500
60
400
50
300
200
388
392
413
425
431
439
452
461
100
0
Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16
Good
Improvement necessary
Feb-16 Mar-16
Generally satisfactory
Urgent improvement necessary
No of Establishments
No of Establishments
396
377
0
1
40
10
700
600
50
0
2
40
0
2
0
2
30
14
22
0
0
0
2
3
3
3
15
12
11
11
12
21
23
25
25
24
1
1
14
22
1
0
1
15
20
10
27
0
Aug-15 Sep-15
Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
Jan-16
Feb-16 Mar-16
10
Level 1: Food is safe – Meat Inspection
Contamination identified at final FBO inspection point
Average carcass compliance levels in England and Wales following post-mortem inspection verification checks are used as a measure of how well an FBO's
food safety management controls have worked. Where contamination is observed, the FBO has to take rectification before meat may pass into the food chain.
Traffic light banding is used to direct FSA inspection resource to those FBO’s who are least compliant. There is no acceptable level of contamination.
Average contamination levels recorded
by Throughput
100%
10%
Targets
8%
Cattle
80%
60%
Cattle &
Sheep/Goats
Pigs
2%
0%
Q2
Q3
Cattle
Q4
Q1
2015/16
Q2
Q3
Sheep/Goats
In all NI approved red meat slaughterhouses
contamination levels are recorded at final inspection
with monitoring and follow up action undertaken by
DARD Veterinary Public Health Programme (VPHP).
Data is also provided to FSA in NI for discussion and
trend analysis on a monthly basis.
Contamination levels
<6% <10% 10%+
Sheep/Goats <6% <10% 10%+
Pigs
<3%
43
39
52
<6%
6%+
38
14
28
12
29
12
24
123
135
139
140
9
42
6
41
9
44
9
37
112
127
127
123
128
21
12
19
14
13
39
30
44
76
77
67
Q1
Q2
2015/16
Q3
22
54
73
75
79
46
49
35
100%
80%
60%
54
56
61
40%
20%
100
18
73
72
84
34
39
35
19
46
0%
80%
Pigs
Cattle
50
100%
Q4
Pigs
Q1
2014/15
61
0%
Sheep/Goats
4%
56
40%
20%
6%
Contamination level recorded
by establishment
60%
34
49
47
58
57
Q1
Q2
2014/15
Q3
Q4
34
40%
20%
57
39
32
80
0%
Q4
11
Level 2: Food is safe – Meat Inspection
Accuracy assessment of FSA teams carrying out Post-Mortem Inspection
An important function for FSA inspectors is to inspect carcasses and offal at post-mortem inspection. At slaughterhouses in England and Wales, as part of our
qualitative performance monitoring, the Official Veterinarians (OV) will check a sample of carcasses and offal that have been health marked (or inspected, in
the case of poultry). In NI, post mortem inspection is carried out by Official Auxiliaries from DARDs VPHP, accuracy is verified on a daily basis by DARD OVs
or Senior Meat Inspectors.
2015/16 Quarter 3
Cattle
Sheep/ Goats
Pigs
Poultry
Average carcase accuracy
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
Number of carcases checked
43,478
73,235
41,892
970,898
Average offal accuracy
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
-
Number of offal checked
43,189
70,330
40,951
-
Accuracy recorded by establishment
Cattle
100%
11
6
11
7
5
4
5
2
129
141
132
136
143
140
142
135
80%
60%
40%
Management
guidelines for
accuracy of Post
Mortem Inspection
>98%
<98%
Sheep / Goats
28
18
16
14
10
11
8
5
107
124
121
123
131
125
133
124
20%
0%
100%
80%
40%
Poultry
4
2
1
4
2
2
0
3
1
4
1
2
2
92
94
97
94
91
95
58
61
62
61
60
63
67
60
Q3
Q4
Q1
2015/16
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
2014/15
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
2015/16
Q2
Q3
11
6
6
88
96
Q1
2014/15
Q2
60%
Pigs
20%
0%
12
Q4
Level 1: Food is what it says it is – Animal Welfare
The FSA enforces animal welfare legislation at slaughterhouses in England and Wales and reports instances of non-compliance. The data
below show the instances categorised as either ‘major’ (i.e. likely to compromise animal welfare but where there is no immediate risk to
animals, may lead to a situation that poses a risk to animals) or ‘critical’ (i.e. poses a serious and imminent risk to animal welfare or one
where avoidable pain distress or suffering has been caused). Reported non-compliances are followed up by appropriate enforcement action.
Q4 Red meat
Q4 Poultry
(includes cattle, calves, goats, pigs, sheep)
(includes broilers, ducks, guinea fowl, hens, turkeys)
Number of instances
recorded
Number of animals
slaughtered
53
(31 Major & 22 Critical)
5,330,857
Number of instances
recorded
Number of establishments
recording issues
29
38
(out of 216 Approved)
(12 Major & 26 Critical)
Operational non-compliances
Red Meat Species
30
Number of establishments
recording issues
17
226,014,360
(out of 79 Approved)
Operational non-compliances
Poultry Species
30
25
20
Bleeding
15
Stunning
Handling
10
No. of instances
25
20
15
10
Operation
5
Design
5
Critical
Major
Mar-16
Feb-16
Jan-16
Dec-15
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
-
Mar-16
Feb-16
Jan-16
Dec-15
Nov-15
Mar-16
Feb-16
Jan-16
Dec-15
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
-
Mar-16
Feb-16
Jan-16
Dec-15
Nov-15
Oct-15
Sep-15
Major
Oct-15
0
0
Sep-15
No. of instances
Number of birds
slaughtered
Critical
In 2016/17 we will be implementing enhanced routine reporting and performance monitoring on animal welfare controls,
as part of the Board's commitment to openness.
13 13
Level 1: Food is what it says it is - Incidents
An incident is defined by the FSA as: ‘Any event where, based on the information available, there are concerns about actual or suspected
threats to the safety or quality of food and feed that could require intervention to protect consumers’ interests.’
Alerts Raised
Notifications Received
80
70
400
60
50
300
40
200
30
20
100
10
0
0
Q1
Q2
Q3
2014/15
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
2015/16
Q4
Allergy Alerts / PRINs Raised
500
Incident Notifications Received
90
RASFFs Received
50
600
160
45
140
40
120
35
100
30
25
80
20
60
15
RASFFs Raised
100
40
10
20
5
0
0
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
2014/15
Q2
Q3
Q4
2015/16
No of RASFFs Received for Action by UK
No of Product Recall Information Notices Raised
No of Incident Notifications Received
No of Allergy Alerts Raised
No of RASFFs Raised
Food business operators are required, under Article 19 of European Regulation No. 178/2002, to inform the competent authorities where
they have reason to believe that a foodstuff that they have imported, produced, manufactured or distributed is not in compliance with food
safety requirements. In the case of the UK, the competent authorities are the Food Standards Agency and the food authorities (local and port
health authorities). Food safety information is communicated between the European Commission and Member States using the Rapid Alert
for Food and Feed (RASFF) system.
14
Level 1: Food Allergy and Food Intolerance / Coeliac
Disease: admissions to hospital
Food Allergy
Trends in hospital admissions in England, Wales & Northern Ireland
Hospital admissions
6000
5000
4000
3000
NI
2000
E&W
1000
0
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Food Intolerance and Coeliac Disease
Trends in hospital admissions in England, Wales & Northern Ireland
Hospital admissions
10000
8000
6000
NI
4000
E&W
2000
0
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Source: Health & Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) website, NHS Wales Informatics Service websites and Department of Health, Social
Services & Public Safety Northern Ireland. Data for hospital admissions in Northern Ireland are not yet available for 2014-15.
15
Level 2: FSA Change Portfolio Q4
Programme
Q4 Milestones
Next steps in FY 16/17 Q1
Campylobacter:
Delivery of 2013 refresh of strategy
Year 2 Q2 retail survey results
published
Publication of year 2 Q3 retail
survey results
Regulating our Future (previously
Future Delivery Models):
Support capability to sustain delivery
of Official Controls
The scope for revised programme
and undertake Gate A review will
be completed in Q1 16/17.
Public stakeholder events are now
complete and communication
and engagement strategy created.
Scope will be confirmed at the
end of April following the
outputs from an initial
Discovery phase
Our Ways of Working:
Creating a vibrant learning
organisation that attracts and retains
the best staff, each of whom are
engaged, highly motivated to deliver,
innovative, collaborative, well led,
and supported with the right tools
Consultation on people offer and
physical spaces options
Complete review of ‘Give it a
Go’ and consultation outputs
Completed
Financial case developed for
full business case
The programme is being defined
and developed ready for Gate B.
The review will be held in May,
rather than April.
Undertake Gate B review and
subject to Portfolio Board
approval, move into delivery
phase.
Science, Evidence and
Information Strategy
Implementation
Delivery confidence
(at 26/01/16)
GA
Unchanged
A
Unchanged
G
Unchanged
G
Unchanged
16
Level 3: Organisational Development
Being the best organisation we can be
Recruitment
Resource: Headcount & turnover
Avg campaign duration to offer - FY 15/16
1200
40
24
20
0
Duration to offer
Q3
Starters
Leavers
200
FY 14/15
Q4
Building capability - Training
Leadership &
Management
(61k) 31%
Campaigning
(5k) 3%
Open Policy
Making (2k) 1%
Value For
Money (£20k)
10%
FY 15/16
Note: The high level of leavers in FY 14/15 is due to the FSS transfer, with 142 staff
transferring on 31/03/2015.
Increasing Diversity & Inclusivity
Corporate training spend by capability theme in 15/16
Personal
Development
(68k)
34%
Headcount
-300
Q2
Note: Stage 3 and Stage 4 campaigns currently reported together. We aim to
differentiate for future reports.
Technical
Skills (40k)
20%
700
14
9
3
Q1
Total roles
Employees
Working days
60
Use of Evidence
/ Collaborating
(£2k) 1%
Three key priorities for this year have been identified through
analysis, and consultation with staff.
Progression opportunities for BAME staff
Investigating and reducing any bias within the
recruitment / interview process
Increasing our declaration rates, to gain a better
understanding of our employee population
These will form the basis of progress reporting in D&I this year.
17
Level 3: Resources used: FSA 15/16 Net
expenditure (excluding AME) £m and Staffing FTEs
1,800
£140.0m
£127.4m
1,561 FTE inc Contractors
1,600
£120.0m
1,400
£32.1m
514
£100.0m
£80.0m
1,200
£95.3m Net
expenditure
inc Capital
exc AME
£36.9m
£60.0m
£18.2m
£40.0m
External funding
(income) for Official
Controls
All Official Controls net
cost inc support
Science, Research &
Local Authority support
800
590
600
Policy & Devolved
£15.2m
£20.0m
£22.1m
-
1,000
400
Corporate Services
Westminster
Capital inc
Depreciation
£2.9m
15/16 Net Expenditure Outturn (Provisional)
£m
200
168
82
207
Staff Numbers
FTEs inc Contractors
18
Level 3: Analysis of Official Controls and Science,
Research & LA Support – FSA Programme spend
19
Level 3: Financial Performance
G
Provisional outturn subject to audit
FSA
FSA provisional outturn (subject to
audit) shows all Government 15/16
limits were met
15/16
Actual
£m
15/16
Budget
£m
Var
Var
£m
%
Northern Ireland
8.5
8.8
0.3
3%
G
Wales
3.3
3.5
0.2
7%
G
Westminster net RDEL inc
Capital exc AME
83.5
84.5
1.1
1%
Westminster total incl
AME
83.9
94.1
10.2
11%
- Programme expenditure
47.7
46.9
(0.8)
(2%)
- Programme depreciation
0.2
0.3
0.1
35%
- Admin expenditure
33.0
34.5
1.6
5%
- Admin depreciation
1.8
1.8
-
-
- Resource AME
0.5
9.6
9.1
95%
- Capital DEL
0.9
1.0
0.2
15%
Note : Favourable / (Adverse)
Northern Ireland and Wales are within limits
G
G
G
Westminster is within limits.
• Westminster Programme, Admin and
Capital expenditure was managed closely
within the control limits set by HM Treasury
• AME is non-controllable expenditure
largely relating to pensions and cannot be
switched into other budget categories
• Capital is predominantly for IT initiatives
and drives depreciation
20
Level 3: Efficiency – Spending Review Trend
G
FSA (England, Wales & Northern Ireland) Resource DEL (exc Capital & AME) 2010-2020
FSA has maintained
‘Programme’ expenditure on
front line delivery.
FSA has reduced ‘Admin’
expenditure whilst maintaining
the resources dedicated to
supporting Science, Research
& Local Authority support.
Devolved budgets for 17/18 to
19/20 have not been set
FSA Westminster Admin (exc Depreciation) net expenditure 2010 - 2016
Reduced ‘Admin’ expenditure
delivered through a reduction
mainly in IT and Estates
expenditure
21
Level 3: Estates – VfM indicators
Since 2010/11, we have reduced our total estate from 8197sqm (7156sqm excluding St Magnus House) to 5076sqm, and we
have reduced our estate costs from £8.7m to £4.4m. The amount of space we use per person is also decreasing. The
Government has a target of 10sqm per FTE by the end of 2015 and 8sqm per FTE by 31 April 18.
Size of Estate
8000
8
6000
6
4000
2000
4
2
0
2010/11
2011/12
2012/13
2013/14
Aviation House, London
Clarendon Quay, Belfast
St Magnus House, Aberdeen
2014/15
0
2015/16
2010/11
Southgate House, Cardiff
Foss House, York
14
8
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
2015/16 Private sector average
2015/16 Government average
14
12
10
Sqm
10
2012/13
16
2015 Target
2018 Target
12
2011/12
Average Sqm per FTE by Location
Average Sqm per FTE for Total Estate
Sqm
Cost of Estate
10
£ Millions
Sqm
10000
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
2013/14
Private Sector
2014/15
Government
2015/16
Food Standards Agency
Aviation House, Southgate House, Clarendon Quay, Foss House, York
London
Cardiff
Belfast
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
22
Level 3: FSA Sustainability
Baseline figures were set on the 2009/10 usage. After the 2010 election the Government set targets based on the 2009/10
usage. Revised targets were set by FSA management for 2015/16.
Water Consumption
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Actual
Target
2009/10
Baseline
2013/14
2014/15
m3
Tonnes
Waste
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Sheets (thousands)
Paper Consumption
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (CO2e)
5000
2500
4000
2000
3000
1500
Actual
Target
1000
Target
2009/10
Baseline
2015/16
2000
Actual
Actual
1000
Target
500
0
0
2009/10
Baseline
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
2009/10
Baseline
2013/14
2014/15
2015/16
Water consumption increased due to a number of contributing factors: over 1000 additional people visited Aviation House in Q3 and maintenance
engineers needed to use pressure washers for a significant amount of time to clean cooling units. Although higher than the FSA management
targets for 2015/16 we still reduced our water consumption by half and lowered our waste in comparison to the 2009/10 Government baseline
23