I will first introduce the concept of magnetic circuits, an ohm’s law equivalent for magnetism. First let’s make an analogy with electric circuits: π¬ = −πV π π, πππ‘ π― = ππ΄ π€ππππ π΄ ππ π‘ππ magnetic π πππππ potential For we to define “A”, the system . π― β ππ = 0 , so we must define that a specific place/plane isn’t part of In this problem, we may choose this place as the plane inside of the circular loop: Now we can define π― = ππ΄ Let’s continue the analogy. π΅ ππ΄π΅= π¬ β ππ π΄ π± = ππ¬ πΌ= π = πΌπ π = πΏ ππ Battery A B π¦πππππ π± β ππΊ π¦πππππ π¦πππππ π¦πππππ π¦πππππ π΅ π΄π΄π΅= π― β ππ π΄ π© = ππ0 π― π= π© β ππΊ π΄ = πβ ; β = ππππ’ππ‘ππππ β= πΏ ; π = π π’πππππ ππππ ππ0 π ππ΄π΅= π΅ π¬ π΄ β ππ = πππ Electric current loop π΅ π΄π΄π΅= π― β ππ = πΌ π΄ A B If we have an inductor, with inductance L, we have: πΌ/β = π = πΏ πΌ π¦πππππ πΏ = 1/β Now let´s solve the problem. Let’s separate the problem in 2 cases: i) ii) The diameter of the electric wire is approximately ‘d’ (L is small) The diameter of the electric wire is λ << d (L is big) The first case: We may assume that all the flux that goes through the current loop will go through the π ferromagnetic, because, neglecting the reluctance of the ferromagnetic π β« π , passing through the ferromagnetic , the field line will go through “d” in the air, against at least “π d” if it passed through the air near the wire, which has a bigger reluctance. πΌ = πβ β ≈ π= πΌ β 4π ππ²π0 π= πΌ ππ²π0 4π ¹ πΈ0 = ππΌ ππ²π0 = πΌ² 2 8π The magnetic flux through the circular loop is constant, because it is made of a superconducting material. So the energy far away from the ferromagnetic is: πΈ1 = πΏπΌ² π² ππ2 π0 ππ2 π0 = = πΌ² 2 2πΏ 8π 4ππΏ The work done is the difference of energy: π = βπΈ = πΌ 2 ππ2 π0 8π ππ2 π0 ππ2 π0 − 1 ≈ πΌ2 4ππΏ 8π ππ2 π0 π²π4 π0 ² = πΌ2 4ππΏ 32π²πΏ If we don’t say use ππ β« π, β ≈ 4π 8π 8ππ + 4ππ + 2 = 2 π0 ππ π ππ0 π2 πππ0 πΈ0 = ππΌ πΌ 2 π2 πππ0 = 2 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΏπΌ² π² πΌ 2 π2 πππ0 π2 πππ0 πΈ1 = = = 2 2πΏ 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) π = βπΈ = πΌ 2 π2 πππ0 π2 πππ0 −1 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) The second case: The diameter of the electric wire λ << d: Now just a little part of the magnetic flux will go through the ferromagnetic, because the 4π 1 reluctance of this path β ≈ ππ ²π β« πΏ , because d >>π λ 0 The most part of the magnetic flux will through a region really near the wire. The reluctance of the path that doesn’t pass through the ferromagnetic will be β0 = 1/πΏ This is because most of the flux will pass in the region really near the wire, the region with the least reluctance, so the reluctance of this is small volume is ≈1/L β= 1 π = πΏ πΌ β0 = π0 π 1 ≈ = πΌ πΌ πΏ So we will have a parallel association or reluctances, the reluctance of the path that don’t pass through the ferromagnetic, and of the path that does pass. The reluctance of the path that passes through the ferromagnetic won’t change much because of this: the surface area of this new path, will be ππ2 − π, π€ππππ π ππ π‘ππ π π’πππππ ππππ ππ π‘πππ πππ€ πππ‘π. 4 π΅π’π‘ π~ d² βͺ a², π π π‘ππ π π’πππππ ππππ π′ π‘ππππππ, πππ ππππ‘πππ ππππ π‘ππ πππ π‘ππππ. 1 4π The reluctance of one path is βΆ , πππ π‘ππ ππππ’ππ‘ππππ ππ π‘ππ ππ‘πππ πππ‘π ππ ≈ 2 πΏ ππ π0 Let βπππ’ π is the equivalent reluctance of the system. 1 βπππ’π = 1 1 ππ2 π0 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 + =πΏ+ = β0 β1 4π 4π βπππ’π = 4π 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 The flux will be: π= πΌ 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 =πΌ β 4π The energy is: πΈ0 = ππΌ 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 = πΌ² 2 8π The energy far away from the ferromagnetic is: πΈ1 = πΏπΌ² π² 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 = = πΌ² 2 2πΏ 8π 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 4πΏπ The work done is the difference of energy: 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 4πΏπ + ππ2 π0 πΏ ππ2 π0 π = βπΈ = πΌ² − 1 = πΌ² + 8π 4πΏπ 2 8π 2 4 2 2 π π π0 ππ π0 = πΌ2 + 32πΏπ 8π ππ2 π0 4πΏπ And as we can see, the work is always positive! If L β« π ≈ πΌ2 ππ 2 π 0 4 , ππ2 π0 8π If we don’t use ππ β« π, β1 ≈ 1 βπππ’π = 4π 8π 8ππ + 4ππ + = π0 ππ2 π2 ππ0 π2 πππ0 1 1 π2 πππ0 πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) + π2 πππ0 + =πΏ+ = β0 β1 8ππ + 4ππ 8ππ + 4ππ βπππ’π = π= πΌ πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) + π2 πππ0 =πΌ β 8ππ + 4ππ ππΌ πΌ 2 πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) + π2 πππ0 = 2 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΈ0 = πΈ1 = πΌ 2 πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) + π2 πππ0 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΌ 2 πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ + π2 πππ0 2 8ππ + 4ππ π = βπΈ = ππ 2 π 0 4 = πΏπΌ² π² πΌ 2 πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) + π2 πππ0 = = 2 2πΏ 2 8ππ + 4ππ βπΈ = If L β« 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) + π2 πππ0 πΌ2 2 1+ π2 πππ0 πΏ(8ππ + 4ππ) π2 πππ0 πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ π2 πππ0 π4 π 2 π2 π0 ² + 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ 2 , π≈ πΌ2 2 π2 πππ0 8ππ + 4ππ Now let´s try the solutions with some numbers, knowing that the inductance of a circular loop is: πΏ = π0 π 4π 1 lnβ‘( − 2 + ) 2 λ 4 If π = 2000 , π = 50ππ, π = 1ππ, µ0 = 4π × 10−7 V·s , A·m πΌ =1π΄ λ = 1 cm πΏ = 1.88 β 10−6 πΌπ πΌ 2 π2 πππ0 π2 πππ0 − 1 = 1.10 β 10−4 π½ 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ π = βπΈ = π = βπΈ = πΌ2 2 π2 πππ0 π4 π 2 π2 π0 ² + 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ 2 = 1.32 β 10−4 π½ A difference of 20% Now with λ = 0,0005 cm = 0.005mm = 5μm πΏ = 3.8 ∗ 10−6 (πΌπ) using π = βπΈ = πΌ 2 π2 πππ0 π2 πππ0 − 1 = 4.9 β 10−5 π½ 2 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ But using: π = βπΈ = πΌ2 2 π2 πππ0 π4 π 2 π2 π0 ² + 8ππ + 4ππ πΏ 8ππ + 4ππ 2 = 7.0 β 10−5 π½ A difference of 42% from the first value. As we can see, the smaller the diameter of the wire, the bigger the difference. But this difference is big just for really small values of λ so it can be neglected almost all the times. ¹ The proof that the energy is equal to πβπΌ 2 from the fact that the energy is π΅π» ππ is below. Let’s consider the magnetic field of an arbitrary loop with current I . dl dS I Let’s divide the entire field in small tube, whose generatrices are the field lines of B. In the figure is shown one of them. It’s energy is BH/2 dl dS. Let’s find the energy in the volume of the entire tube. The flux dπ = π΅ ππ through the tube cross section is constant along the tube, so it can be taken out of the integral: ππΈ = ππ 2 π» ππ = πΌ ππ 2 Now, summing the energy of all elementary tubes: 1 πΈ= πΌ 2 ππ = πΌπ 2 This formula can only be applies when the dependence of B vs H is linear, in other words, when π΅ = ππ0 π», which is the case of this problem. Bibliography: ‘Basic laws of electromagnetism, I.E Irodov’ ‘Eletromagnetismo, William H. Hayt Jr’