TEST REPORT
Report Number: 100739395MIN-005
Project Number: G100739395
Testing performed on the
USB Fieldbus Interface
To
IEC 61326-1: 2005
Class B for Emissions, Basic Immunity Test Requirements
47 CFR, Part 15:2010, §15.107 and §15.109, Class B
ICES-003, Issue 4:2004
For
Emerson Process Management
Test Performed by:
Intertek Testing Services NA, Inc.
7250 Hudson Blvd., Suite 100
Oakdale, MN 55128 USA
Prepared by:
Test Authorized by:
Asset Optimization Business Unit of FisherRosemount Systems, Inc.
12001 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
Date: June 26, 2012
Clay Huff
Reviewed by:
Date: June 26, 2012
Norman Shpilsher
This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its
Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no
liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage
occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then
only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material,
product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are
relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever
been under an Intertek certification program.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE (EUT) ................................................................................. 3
2.0
TEST SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Statement of the Measurement Uncertainty.............................................................................. 4
3.0
EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST ....................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Power Configuration ..................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 EUT Configuration......................................................................................................................... 5
3.3 Environmental conditions ............................................................................................................. 5
3.4 Performance level ......................................................................................................................... 6
4.0
TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS........................................................................................ 7
4.1 Line Conducted Emissions .......................................................................................................... 7
4.2 Radiated Emissions .................................................................................................................... 11
4.5 Immunity Requirements.............................................................................................................. 15
4.5.1 Electrostatic Discharge ...................................................................................................... 15
4.5.2 Radiated, Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field ....................................................... 17
5.0
TEST EQUIPMENT..................................................................................................................... 19
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 2 of 19
1.0
DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE (EUT)
Model:
USB Fieldbus Interface
Type of EUT:
USB to Foundation Fieldbus Communication Interface
Serial Number / Intertek Sample ID:
MIN1206080941-003
Company:
Emerson Process Management
Customer:
Mr. Anis Ahmad
Address:
Asset Optimization Business Unit of Fisher-Rosemount
Systems, Inc.
12001 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
Phone:
(952) 828-3946
Fax:
e-mail:
Test Standards:
(952) 828-3299
Anis.Ahmad@emerson.com
EN 55022:2010 / AC:2011, Class
EN 55011:2009 +A1:2010, Group , Class
47 CFR, Part 15:2010, §15.107 and §15.109, Class B
EN 55014-1:2006 +A1:2009 +A2:2011
ICES-003, Issue 4:2004
IEC 61326-1:2005
Class B for Radiated and Conducted Emissions
Basic Immunity Test Requirements
Immunity Test Requirements for Industrial Locations
EN 60601-1-2:2001 +A1:2006
EN 61000-6-3:2007 +A1:2011
EN 61000-6-4:2007 +A1:2011
EN 61000-3-2:2006 +A1:2009 +A2:2009
EN 61000-3-3:2008
EN 61000-6-1:2007
EN 61000-6-2:2005
EN 55024:2010
EN 55014-2:1997 +A1:2001 A2:2008
Other
Date Sample Submitted:
May 30, 2012
Test Work Started:
June 7, 2012
Test Work Completed:
June 8, 2012
Damaged
Poor (Usable)
Prototype
Production
Good
Test Sample Conditions:
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Used
Page 3 of 19
2.0
TEST SUMMARY
Referring to the performance criteria and the operating mode during the tests specified in this report, the
equipment complies with the requirements according to the following standards.
TEST STANDARD
TEST
RESULT
CISPR 11 / FCC Part 15.109
Radiated Emissions
Pass
CISPR 11 / FCC Part 15.107
Conducted Emissions
Pass
IEC 61000-3-2
Harmonic Current Emissions
N/A
IEC 61000-3-3
Voltage Fluctuations Emissions
N/A
IEC 61000-4-2
Electrostatic Discharge Immunity
Pass
IEC 61000-4-3
Radiated Electromagnetic Field Immunity
Pass
IEC 61000-4-4
Burst Immunity
N/A
IEC 61000-4-6
Conducted RF Immunity
N/A
IEC 61000-4-5
Surge Immunity
N/A
IEC 61000-4-8
Rated Power-Frequency Field Immunity
N/A
IEC 61000-4-11
Voltage Dips/Short Interruptions Immunity
N/A
Notes:
2.1
1. Harmonic Current Emissions, Voltage Fluctuations Emissions, Burst Immunity, Conducted RF
Immunity, Surge Immunity, Voltage Dips/Short Interruptions Immunity tests were not
performed as EUT is DC powered equipment and all I/O cables are less then 3.0m in length.
2. Rated Power-Frequency Field Immunity test was not performed as the EUT contains no
magnetic sensitive devices.
Statement of the Measurement Uncertainty
Note 1: The measured result in this report is within the specification limits by more than the
measurement uncertainty; the measured result indicates that the product tested complies with
the specification limit.
The expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for radiated emissions from 30 to 1000 MHz has been determined to be:
±4 dB at 10m and ±5.4 dB at 3m
The expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for conducted emissions from 150 kHz to 30 MHz has been determined to
be:
±2.6 dB
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 4 of 19
3.0
EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST
3.1
Power Configuration
120VAC
500 mA
50Hz
1 Phase
Rated voltage:
Rated current:
Rated frequency:
Number of phases:
3.2
230VAC
400VAC
5 VDC from Local Computer
60Hz
3 Phases
EUT Configuration
The equipment under test was operated during the measurement under the following conditions:
- Standby
- Continuous Normal Operation (see details below)
- Test program
Operating modes of the EUT:
No. Description
1
Power segment Mode of operation. Running the ConfigUtility on the local PC and communicating with the
Fieldbus transmitter. The EUT is connected to PC/Laptop using USB cable. The other side of the EUT is
connected to the Foundation Fieldbus power hub which is connected to the pressure transmitter.
Monitoring of the EUT:
No. Description
1
Reading live Dynamic values from the device continuously on the Local PC Display using USB cable
for continuous updating Dynamic Values.
Cables:
No.
1
2
Type
2-wire shielded
USB shielded
Length
2.0 m
1.0 m
Designation
Note
Power
USB
Support equipment/Services:
No.
Item
1
2
3
4
GT-41052-1524
300S1AFM5
Dell Computer
FIELDBUS Power Hub FCS-PH-PL
General notes:
Description
FieldBus Power Source
Pressure transmitter Device
Local Computer
FieldBus Hub
None
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 5 of 19
3.3
Environmental conditions
During the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges:
Temperature:
15-35 ° C
Humidity:
30-60 %
Atmospheric pressure:
3.4
86-106 kPa
Performance level
The test results shall be classified in terms of the loss of function or degradation of performance of the
equipment under test, relative to a performance level defined by its manufacturer or the requestor of the test,
or agreed between the manufacturer and the purchaser of the product.
Definition related to the performance level:
based on the used product standard
based on the declaration of the manufacturer, requestor or purchaser
Criterion A:
Normal performance within the specification limits.
Criterion B:
Temporary degradation or loss of function or performance which is self-recovering.
Criterion C:
Temporary degradation in performance or loss of function or performance which requires operator intervention
or system reset.
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 6 of 19
4.0
TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS
4.1
Line Conducted Emissions
Test result:
Pass
Frequency range:
0.15MHz-30MHz
Max. Emissions margin:
3.1dB below the limits
Notes: The EUT powered at 5VDC from USB port of the Local Computer, therefore, testing was performed at
AC port of the Local Computer.
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 7 of 19
Test Setup Photos
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 8 of 19
Result:
June 7, 2012
Clay Huff
FCC Part 15.107, Class B
Line 1 and Line 2
See page 5
None
Date:
Tested by:
Standard:
Test Point:
Operation mode:
Note:
Pass
Table 1
Line 1
Frequency
MHz
QP
dBµV
AVG
dBµV
Cable Loss
dB
QP Lim
dBµV
AVG Lim
dBµV
0.155
0.259
0.520
6.530
20.510
21.120
50.2
45.2
39.8
34.5
51.4
49.4
34.2
42.0
29.8
28.5
44.4
43.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.6
1.1
1.1
65.7
61.5
56.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
55.7
51.5
46.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Frequency
MHz
QP
dBµV
AVG
dBµV
Cable Loss
dB
QP Lim
dBµV
AVG Lim
dBµV
0.161
0.302
0.552
15.900
21.200
21.230
48.3
44.7
36.7
44.8
41.7
52.3
39.8
41.7
30.2
40.5
32.7
45.8
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.0
1.1
1.1
65.4
60.2
56.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
55.4
50.2
46.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
QP Margin AVG Margin
dB
dB
-15.4
-16.2
-16.0
-24.9
-7.5
-9.5
-21.4
-9.4
-16.0
-20.9
-4.5
-5.6
Line 2
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
QP Margin AVG Margin
dB
dB
-17.0
-15.4
-19.1
-14.2
-17.2
-6.6
-15.5
-8.4
-15.6
-8.5
-16.2
-3.1
Page 9 of 19
Graph 1
Graph 2
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 10 of 19
4.2
Radiated Emissions
Test location:
OATS
Anechoic Chamber
Test distance:
10 meters
3 meters
Test result:
Pass
Frequency range:
30MHz-1000MHz
Max. Emissions margin:
9.8dB below the limits
Notes: The Radiated Emissions Testing was performed in the Anechoic chamber at 3m measurement
distance (see Tables 2-3 and Graphs 3-4);
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 11 of 19
Test Setup Photos
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 12 of 19
Result:
June 7, 2012
Clay Huff
CISPR 11, Class B / FCC Part 15.109
Enclosure
See page 5
None
Date:
Tested by:
Standard:
Test Point:
Operation mode:
Note:
Pass
Table 2
(CISPR 11 Limits)
Frequency
Antenna
Ant. CF Cable loss Pre-amp QP Reading Total @ 3m
MHz
Polarity Hts(cm) dB1/m
dB
Gain (dB)
dBµV
dBµV/m
Limit
dBµV/m
Margin
dB
31.62
43.54
114.53
143.20
249.99
797.51
V
V
V
V
V
V
107
107
107
107
107
107
18.9
12.4
12.6
11.9
13.0
20.9
0.5
0.6
1.1
1.3
1.7
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.2
9.6
15.1
12.6
21.5
7.5
26.6
22.6
28.8
25.8
36.2
31.8
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
47.0
47.0
-13.4
-17.4
-11.2
-14.2
-10.8
-15.2
30.20
143.74
249.99
400.86
400.91
797.80
H
H
H
H
H
H
107
107
107
107
107
160
19.7
11.9
13.0
16.4
16.4
20.9
0.5
1.3
1.7
2.3
2.3
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.4
5.5
16.2
11.4
11.2
11.6
23.6
18.6
30.9
30.1
29.9
35.9
40.0
40.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
47.0
-16.4
-21.4
-16.1
-16.9
-17.1
-11.1
Comments
Table 3
(FCC 15.109 Limits)
Frequency
Antenna
Ant. CF Cable loss Pre-amp QP Reading Total @ 3m
Limit
MHz
Polarity Hts(cm) dB1/m
dB
Gain (dB)
dBµV
dBµV/m
dBµV/m
Margin
dB
31.62
43.54
114.53
143.20
249.99
797.51
V
V
V
V
V
V
107
107
107
107
107
107
18.9
12.4
12.6
11.9
13.0
20.9
0.5
0.6
1.1
1.3
1.7
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.2
9.6
15.1
12.6
21.5
7.5
26.6
22.6
28.8
25.8
36.2
31.8
40.0
40.0
43.5
43.5
46.0
46.0
-13.4
-17.4
-14.7
-17.8
-9.8
-14.2
30.20
143.74
249.99
400.86
400.91
797.80
H
H
H
H
H
H
107
107
107
107
107
160
19.7
11.9
13.0
16.4
16.4
20.9
0.5
1.3
1.7
2.3
2.3
3.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.4
5.5
16.2
11.4
11.2
11.6
23.6
18.6
30.9
30.1
29.9
35.9
40.0
43.5
46.0
46.0
46.0
46.0
-16.4
-24.9
-15.1
-15.9
-16.1
-10.1
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Comments
Page 13 of 19
Graph 3
Graph 4
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 14 of 19
4.5
Immunity Requirements
4.5.1
Electrostatic Discharge
Date:
Tested by:
Standard:
Test Point:
Operation mode:
Note:
Result:
June 8, 2012
Clay Huff
IEC 61000-4-2
Enclosure
See Page 5
None
Pass
Test specification
Contact discharge voltage:
Air discharge voltage:
Discharge impedance:
Discharge factor:
Number of discharges:
Type of discharge:
Polarity:
Test Setup:
Discharge location:
2 kV
2 kV
330 Ω / 150 pF
4 kV
4 kV
6 kV
6 kV
8 kV
Other:
≥ 1 sec.
≥ 10 per each test level and polarity
Direct Discharge
Air Discharge
Direct Discharge
Contact Discharge
Indirect Discharge
Contact Discharge
Positive
Negative
see photo of the test set-up
all external locations accessible by hand
horizontal plate (HCP)
vertical coupling plate (VCP)
Notes: During the test no deviation was detected to the selected operation mode(s).
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 15 of 19
Test Setup Photos
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 16 of 19
4.5.2
Radiated, Radio-frequency, Electromagnetic Field
Test location:
Immunity Anechoic Chamber
Date:
Tested by:
Standard:
Test Point:
Operation mode:
Note:
June 8, 2012
Clay Huff
IEC 61000-4-3
Four sides of EUT
See Page 5
None
3 meters Anechoic Chamber
Result:
Pass
Test specification
Frequency range and
Field strength:
EUT - antenna separation:
Modulation:
Frequency step:
Antenna polarisation:
80 to 1000 MHz
1.4 to 2.0 GHz
10 V/m
10 V/m
3 V/ m
3 V/m
1 V/ m
1 V/m
2.5 m
AM: 80 %
sinusoidal 1000Hz
PM duty cycle 50% 100Hz
900 MHz Pulse Modulation
1 % with 3 sec dwell time
horizontal
vertical
2.0 to 2.7 GHz
10 V/m
3 V/m
1 V/m
Notes: During the test no deviation was detected to the selected operation mode(s).
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 17 of 19
Test Setup Photos
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 18 of 19
5.0
TEST EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION
MANUFACTURER
MODEL
SERIAL NO.
INTERTEK
ID
CAL DUE
Spectrum Analyzer
R&S
ESU
100398
25283
12/09/2012
Bicono-Log Antenna
Schaffner-Chase
CBL 6112 B
2468
9734
11/08/2012
LISN
Fischer Custom
Communications
FCC-LISN-50-32-2-01
97-01
9835
01/24/2013
System
Quantum Change
TILE! Instrument Control
Ver. 3.4.K.29
15259
VBU
Power Amplifier
IFI
SMX150
N987-0809
26024
VBU
Signal Generator
R&S
SMT 03
DE12157
9950
11/17/2012
ESD Simulator
Schaffner
NSG 438
311
17071
03/07/2013
Radiant Arrow
Antenna
Amplifier Research
AT5080
304256
12723
VBU
Power Meter
HP
HP 437B
3125U15049
17661
01/26/2013
Power Sensor
HP
8482H
1545A01012
MIN-0076
05/15/2013
Power Amplifier
Milmega
ASO104-30/30BB
980047
12665
VBU
EMC Report No: 100739395MIN-005
Page 19 of 19
USED
7250 Hudson Blvd., Suite 100, Oakdale, MN 55128
Tel.: 1 651-730-1188, Fax: 1 651-730-1282
Test Verification of Conformity
On the basis of the tests undertaken, the sample(s) of the below product have been found
to comply with the essential requirements of the referenced specifications at the time the
tests were carried out.
Applicant Name & Address
: Asset Optimization Business Unit of Fisher-Rosemount
Systems, Inc.
12001 Technology Drive
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
Product(s) Tested
: USB to Foundation Fieldbus Communication Interface
Model(s)
: USB Fieldbus Interface
Brand name
: Emerson Process Management
Relevant Standard(s)/Specification(s)
: IEC 61326-1:2005,
Class B for Radiated and Conducted Emissions
Basic Immunity Test Requirements
47 CFR, Part 15:2010, §15.107 and §15.109, Class B
ICES-003, ISSUE 4: 2004
Verification Issuing Office Name &
Address
: Intertek, Oakdale, Minnesota
Date of Test(s)
: June 7, 2012 – Jun 8, 2012
Verification/Report Number(s)
: 100739395MIN-005
EMC Department
NOTE : This verification is part of the full test report(s) and should be read in conjunction with it.
This Verification is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and
liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the
agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this Verification. Only the Client is authorized to copy or distribute this Verification. Any use
of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The
observations and test results referenced from this Verification are relevant only to the sample tested. This Verification by itself does not imply that the material,
product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.
Signature:
Name:
Norman Shpilsher
Position:
EMC Team Leader
Date:
www.intertek.com
June 26, 2012
SD 12.3.1 (4/29/08) Mandatory