MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE B: PROJECT FILE UPDATE BALMORAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION Prepared by: Hatch Mott MacDonald 301 - 200 S. Syndicate Avenue Thunder Bay, Ontario P7E 1C9 (807) 623-3449 (phone) (807) 623-5925 (fax) January 2016 353364 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The City of Thunder Bay initiated a Class Environmental Assessment for the Balmoral Street corridor between the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway and Beverly Street to address concerns with a deteriorated roadway condition, drainage, provide intersection improvements for the Balmoral Street & Harbour Expressway, Balmoral Street & Sibley/Hewitson and the Balmoral Street & Amber/Alloy intersections as these intersections are currently operating under an undesirable level of service, and integrate the City’s Active Transportation multi-use trail network as the existing network is incomplete between the north and south section of Balmoral. 2. Class Environmental Assessment Process This project is being planned as a Schedule ‘B’ municipal transportation project in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA 2011 version). A key component of the Class EA process is to inform and consult with the public and concerned agencies. According to the Class EA planning and design process, the public, review agencies and the Ministry of the Environment will be notified on the completion of the study. Subject to any comments being received during the 30 day review period following the Notice of Completion, and assuming that no Part II orders are received, the City may proceed to the design and construction stages. 3. Problem and Opportunity Statement The existing road surface along this section of Balmoral Street has reached a deteriorated condition since the last resurfacing improvements that were carried out between the mid 80’s to early 90’s. Traffic volumes have increased and additional traffic control measures are required for turning movements at intersections. There is an existing gap in the City’s Active Transportation Plan for a multi-use trail between the north and south section of Balmoral Street. There is an opportunity to rehabilitate and reconstruct the roadway structure along with geometric, active transportation and storm water improvements. 4. Review of Alternative Planning Solutions The following list of alternative solutions to satisfy the Problem and Opportunity Statement were developed and evaluated: Do nothing Resurface the roadway maintaining existing geometrics Complete intersection improvements Full roadway reconstruction as well as completing intersection improvements HMM353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page ES - 1 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Based on the evaluation, the preferred planning solution is to complete a full roadway reconstruction. This solution addresses the problem and opportunities statement by providing an urban road cross-section, improved intersection geometrics to accommodate existing/future traffic volumes, improves roadway and property drainage and provides pedestrians with an active transportation facility. 5. Review of Alternative Design Solutions Various design alternatives were proposed and evaluated to further refine the project. The preferred project was developed, and the main components are noted as follows: Construction of a full urban road cross-section including the implementation of concrete curb and gutter, storm sewers and landscaped boulevards. Geometric improvements at the Balmoral Street/Harbour Expressway including increased storage lanes and widening the intersection to facilitate double left-turn lanes, as warranted. Traffic movement safety improvements at the Balmoral Street/Hewitson Street and Balmoral Street/Amber Drive intersections, as warranted. Integration of a new multi-use trail along Balmoral Street consistent with the City’s Active Transportation Plan. Storm water drainage improvements by means of green infrastructure, low impact development and piped storm sewers. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 2 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Executive Summary Table of Contents 1. STUDY BACKGROUND & PURPOSE ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 STUDY PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION AND STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................... 2 1.4 REFERENCES & BACKGROUND STUDIES...................................................................................................... 2 1.5 CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) PROCESS ................................................................................... 3 1.6 PROJECT TEAM ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.7 STUDY SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.8 CONSULTATION WITH REVIEW AGENCIES, SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS AND THE PUBLIC – PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED 3 1.9 COMPLETION OF STUDY (SUBMISSION OF PROJECT FILE)............................................................................... 5 2. INVENTORY OF THE ENVIRONMENT....................................................................................... 6 2.1 EXISTING AND FUTURE TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS................................................................................. 6 2.1.1 Existing Pavement Structure .............................................................................................. 6 2.1.2 Existing Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Future Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................... 6 2.1.4 Intersection Analysis .......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 EXISTING DRAINAGE .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST FACILITIES ......................................................................................................... 9 2.5 EXISTING LAND USES ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.6 TERRESTRIAL HABITAT ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.7 WATER-CROSSINGS / FISHERIES HABITAT .................................................................................................. 9 2.8 PROBLEM AND OPPORTUNITY STATEMENT ................................................................................................. 9 3. ALTERNATIVES TO THE UNDERTAKING ...............................................................................11 3.1 IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS ........................................................................................... 11 3.2 PLANNING ALTERNATIVES CRITERIA AND EVALUATION ................................................................................ 11 3.3 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 Alternative 1: Do Nothing .................................................................................................11 3.3.2 Alternative 2: Resurface the Balmoral Street Roadway ....................................................12 3.3.3 Alternative 3: Complete Intersection Improvements .......................................................12 3.3.4 Alternative 4: Full Roadway Reconstruction, Intersection Improvements and Active Transportation Connectivity .............................................................................................12 3.3.4.1 3.3.4.2 3.3.4.3 4. Impact on Natural Environment................................................................................................. 12 Impact on Social Environment ................................................................................................... 12 Utilities ....................................................................................................................................... 13 3.4 RECOMMENDED PLANNING ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................ 13 ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS ..............................................................................................................14 4.1 KEY FEATURES OF THE RECOMMENDED PLANNING ALTERNATIVE .................................................................. 14 4.2 DESIGN CRITERIA ................................................................................................................................ 14 4.2.1 Roadway Alignment ..........................................................................................................15 4.2.2 Concrete Curb & Gutter and Storm Drainage ...................................................................15 4.2.3 Active Transportation .......................................................................................................15 4.2.4 Pavement Rehabilitation ..................................................................................................16 4.2.5 Intersection Improvements ..............................................................................................16 4.2.6 Beautification & Landscaping ...........................................................................................17 4.2.7 Roadway Lighting ..............................................................................................................18 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 4.2.8 Transit ………………………………………………………………………………….19 4.2.9 Accessibility .......................................................................................................................19 4.2.10 Additional Considerations .................................................................................................19 4.2.11 Preliminary Design Drawings and Concepts .....................................................................20 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................21 5.1 DESCRIPTION OF ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................ 21 5.2 CONSTRUCTION STAGING...................................................................................................................... 21 5.3 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS .................................................................................................................. 21 5.4 APPROVALS........................................................................................................................................ 22 5.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES............................................................................ 22 5.5.1 Noise Impacts....................................................................................................................22 5.5.2 Water Crossings ................................................................................................................22 5.5.3 Erosion and Sediment Control ..........................................................................................22 5.5.4 Air Quality Impacts............................................................................................................23 5.5.5 Emergency Spill Response ................................................................................................23 5.5.6 Waste Management .........................................................................................................23 5.5.7 Heritage and Archaeological .............................................................................................23 5.5.8 Accessibility .......................................................................................................................23 5.5.9 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................23 6. CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................................................24 6.1 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................... 24 6.2 CLASS EA STATUS ............................................................................................................................... 24 List of Figures Figure 1: Project Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 2 Appendix A Public Comment Invited Notice, Letter to Property/Business Owners & Complete Mailing Lists Appendix B Environmental Assessment Communication Log Appendix C Preliminary Design Drawings and Concepts City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 1. Study Background & Purpose 1.1 Study Background The City of Thunder Bay has identified the need to: Reconstruct the existing road surface on Balmoral Street as the roadway has reached a deteriorated condition since the last resurfacing improvements that were carried out between the mid 80’s to early 90’s; Provide intersection improvements for the Balmoral Street & Harbour Expressway, Balmoral Street & Sibley/Hewitson and the Balmoral Street & Amber/Alloy intersections as these intersections are currently operating under an undesirable level of service; Integrate the City’s Active Transportation multi-use trail network as the existing network is incomplete between the north and south section of Balmoral, and; Improve storm water drainage. 1.2 Study Purpose The purpose and objectives of this study are to: Enhance traffic and pedestrian safety along the corridor; Address existing/projected vehicular capacities at the traffic signal controlled Balmoral Street/Harbour Expressway intersection; Address existing turning movement safety concerns at the uncontrolled Balmoral Street & Sibley/Hewitson and Balmoral Street & Amber/Alloy intersections; Integrate the City’s Active Transportation multi-use trail network plan between the north and south section of the study area; Implement green infrastructure and low impact developments, as applicable, to improve storm water management, and; Identify a technically preferred alternative design to address opportunities and anticipated deficiencies; 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 1 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 1.3 Project Location and Study Area The primary study area for assessment of alternatives is generally defined as Balmoral Street between the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway and Beverly Street as illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Study Area 1.4 References & Background Studies References, including previous studies completed in the vicinity of the study area reviewed and referenced in the text of this report are outlined below. 353364 City of Thunder Bay Official Plan, 2005 Geotechnical Investigation Report: Balmoral Street Reconstruction, DST, August 2015. Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 2 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, Municipal Engineers Association, 2011. West Intercity Area Transportation Study, DS-Lea Consultants Ltd., December 1995 Balmoral/Hewitson and Harbour Expressway Review, DS-Lea Consultants Ltd., June 2000. City of Thunder Bay Engineering Development Standards, 2015. City of Thunder Bay Department of Transportation & Works Contract Documents Manual, 2000. 1.5 Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Process This project was planned as a Schedule “B” municipal transportation project in accordance with the Municipal Engineers Association Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, 2011 version. The Class EA for this undertaking includes the resurfacing of the existing road, intersection improvements, the addition of bicycle paths and pedestrian pathways and sidewalks and an extension of the existing storm sewer systems. The project was organized generally to conform to the phases detailed in the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment document. 1.6 Project Team Hatch Mott MacDonald (HMM) was retained by the City of Thunder Bay in May 2015 to complete the Class Environmental Assessment planning and public consultation process, detailed design and construction supervision for this project. As part of HMM’s team, Goel Group Ltd. was contracted to complete the traffic signal design and tendering aspects of the project, and DST Consulting Engineers was contracted to complete the geotechnical investigations and Pavement Design Report for this project. 1.7 Study Schedule The study was initiated in May 2015. The major milestones are summarized as follows: Project Initiation Notice of Commencement of Study Notice of Completion May 2015 October 31, 2015 January 2016 The project is expected to proceed in three stages with the first stage of construction tentatively scheduled for 2016. 1.8 Consultation with Review Agencies, Special Interest Groups and the Public – Public Comment Invited Initial contact was made with the public and the government review agencies during Phase Two of the project. This is a mandatory point of contact under the Class EA. A Public Comment Invited notice was published in the following local publications on the following dates: 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 3 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Chronicle Journal – Saturday, October 31, 2015 Chronicle Journal – Wednesday, November 4, 2015 Letters with the Public Comment Invited Notice were delivered to government review agencies and other interest groups, as well as all property/business owners abutting the project limits. A copy of the Notice as well as a copy of the letter is included in Appendix A. The following is a list of the government review agencies and special interest groups that were provided written notification of the study: Ministries Aboriginal Affairs Environment & Climate Change Municipal Affairs & Housing Natural Resources & Forestry Transportation Aboriginal Groups Métis Nation of Ontario – Head Office Métis Nation of Ontario – Thunder Bay Fort William First Nation Red Sky Métis Independent Nation Agencies & Authorities Thunder Bay Police Services City of Thunder Bay Fire & Rescue Lakehead Region Conservation Authority Utilities TBayTel Shaw Cable Union Gas Thunder Bay Hydro HydroOne TELUS Corporation MTS Allstream City of Thunder Bay Transportation and Works Department Office of the City Clerk Community Services – Parks Division City of Thunder Bay Mayor and Council Members The Thunder Bay Community Economic Development Commission A detailed mailing list of the above is included in Appendix A. A number of comments/concerns were received and are generally summarized below: Active Transportation Trail (ATT) vs concrete sidewalks; Lighting at pedestrian crossings and along the proposed ATT; Pedestrian/cyclist safety; Lack of bicycle/active transportation facilities and pedestrian access to businesses; Harbour Expressway intersection configuration (proposed double lefts); Landscaping and vegetation; Green infrastructure and low impact development storm water management; Transit accessibility. A general email response was provided to all those who commented on the Public Comment Invited Notice, stating that the comments/questions will be reviewed and taken into consideration. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 4 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Concerned business owners whose limits are being directly impacted by the proposed improvements were met on an individual basis to ensure specific property issues and concerns were addressed. Copies of the comments and responses can be found in Appendix B. 1.9 Completion of Study (Submission of Project File) A Notice of Completion will be published in local newspapers at the time of submission of the updated Project File. The Notice of Completion for the updated Project File identifies any additional locations where the document can be viewed as well as notify the public and other stakeholders of their right to request a Part II Order, and how and when such a request must be submitted. The public is encouraged to contact the City of Thunder Bay or their consultants if there are questions or concerns about this project. If, after consulting with City staff or their consultants serious environmental concerns remain unresolved, it is the public’s right to request that the project be subject to an individual Environmental Assessment. The decision rests with the Minister of the Environment. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 5 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 2. Inventory of the Environment 2.1 Existing and Future Transportation Conditions Balmoral Street is a four-lane undivided major arterial roadway primarily running north-south through the City of Thunder Bay, Ontario. The posted speed limit on Balmoral Street is 60 km/hr from the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway to Lithium Drive and reducing to 50 km/h from Lithium Drive to the northern end of the study area. 2.1.1 Existing Pavement Structure DST Consulting Engineers was retained by HMM to complete the geotechnical investigation for this project. The existing pavement along Balmoral Street consists of 110 to 195 mm of hot-mix asphalt. Crushed sand and gravel with trace silt was encountered underlying the asphalt with a thickness of this layer ranging from 76 mm to 670 mm. A heterogeneous mixture of fine to coarse grained sand with gravel and trace silt was encountered beneath the sand and gravel layer with thickness ranging from thickness of this layer ranged from 0.255 m to 2.17m. 2.1.2 Existing Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes were obtained from the City of Thunder Bay for the following intersections: Balmoral Street & Harbour Expressway Balmoral Street & Hewitson Street/Sibley Drive Balmoral Street & Alloy Drive/Amber Drive The remaining intersections (Balmoral and William Street, Central Avenue, Lithium Drive, Jasper Drive, Beverly Street) along the corridor were not analyzed as part of this project. 2.1.3 Future Traffic Conditions The existing traffic volumes along Balmoral Street were estimated using a conservative annual growth rate of one percent. The existing traffic volumes were forecasted to a 20-year horizon from 2015 to 2035. 2.1.4 Intersection Analysis The relative performance of an intersection is measured in terms of level of service (LOS), which ranges from A (excellent) to F (beyond capacity). The City of Thunder Bay considers Level of Service (LOS) “D” at capacity and they have indicated that ideally they would like to see all intersections operating at a LOS “C” where feasible. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 6 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Balmoral Street and Harbour Expressway Intersection This signalized intersection is currently operating at an overall LOS “D” as the westbound movement experiences heavy congestion in the PM peak hour, specifically the westbound through and westbound left (WBL) movements. Due to the high left turning volumes and existing signal timings, the WBL movement is currently operating at close to capacity and experiences long queues which frequently exceed the existing vehicle storage capacity of the left turning lane. With the addition of the projected traffic growth and the existing configuration, the overall intersection operation decreases to LOS “F”. With the addition of the project traffic growth and the implementation of dual lefts, the overall intersection operation remains at a LOS “D”. In order to achieve a LOS “C” at the Balmoral Street and Harbour expressway intersection, the widening of both Balmoral Street and Harbour Expressway from 2 through lanes to 3 lanes through lanes would be required as this reduces the congestion and shortens delay times. It was agreed upon by the City that a LOS “D” would be acceptable at the Balmoral & Harbour Expressway intersection. Balmoral Street and Hewitson Street/Sibley Drive Intersection This unsignalized intersection is currently operating at an overall LOS “F”. As a result of the heavy north/south traffic volumes, the eastbound and westbound through and left movements are not supplied with sufficient gaps to allow for safe execution of those movements. This causes the traffic along Hewitson Street and Sibley Drive to experience critical delay times and queuing in both the AM and PM peak hours. With the addition of the projected traffic growth and the implementation of a partial median, the overall intersection operation will increase to a LOS “A”. The partial median restricts the eastbound/westbound through movements and northbound/southbound left turn movements from Hewitson Street/Sibley Drive. The implementation of traffic signals at this intersection was not considered as an existing signalized intersection is in close proximity. Balmoral Street and Alloy Drive/Amber Drive Intersection This unsignalized intersection is also currently operating at an overall LOS “F”. Similar to the Hewitson Street/Sibley Drive intersection, the heavy north/south traffic volumes along Balmoral Street cause the eastbound and westbound left movements to operate at an unsatisfactory LOS “F”. With the addition of the projected traffic growth and the implementation of a partial median, the overall intersection operation will increase to a LOS “A”. The partial median restricts the 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 7 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 eastbound/westbound through movements and northbound/southbound left turn movements from Alloy Drive/Amber Drive. The implementation of traffic signals at this intersection was not considered as an existing signalized intersection is in close proximity. 2.2 Existing Drainage The existing drainage patterns of the Balmoral Street corridor within the study area generally flow in a north to south direction along the corridor and in a west to east direction across the corridor. The existing surface drainage system is comprised of a series of roadside ditches, shallow swales and a variety of flexible pipe culverts crossing various intersections. The study section of Balmoral Street also contains a number of independent storm sewers systems along the roadway that outlet directly into the adjacent ditches along the roadway. Various businesses that rear face Balmoral Street along the study area have their parking lots draining into the existing roadside ditches. 2.3 Utilities Thunder Bay Telephone (TBayTel) The TBayTel Engineering Department identified that they possess both aerial and buried plants within the Balmoral Street corridor. An aerial distribution cable traverses the Balmoral Street corridor, affixed to poles owned and operated by Thunder Bay Hydro. Shaw Cable Shaw Cable has aerial and underground plants within the study section of the Balmoral Street corridor. The aerial distribution cable piggybacks the Thunder Bay Hydro poles. Thunder Bay Hydro Thunder Bay Hydro has an extensive distribution system throughout the study area. All of the existing utility poles along this section of the Balmoral Street corridor are owned by Thunder Bay Hydro. The majority of wooden poles running along the east side of the corridor carry roadway illumination and some poles on the west side carry roadway luminaries as well. Union Gas Union Gas has a gas distribution line that runs underground in various areas along the corridor. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 8 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Hydro One Hydro One owns and operates a four circuit, high transmission line that runs west to east along the Harbour Expressway and crosses the intersection of Balmoral Street and the Harbour Expressway. 2.4 Pedestrian and Cyclist Facilities There is an existing sidewalk along the eastern side of the corridor from the Balmoral Street and Beverly Street intersection southerly to the Balmoral Street and Jasper Drive intersection. A continuous pedestrian sidewalk does not exist throughout the limits of the corridor. There are currently no designated cycling or active transportation facilities throughout the study area. 2.5 Existing Land Uses Light commercial as well as institutional land uses are located throughout the corridor. Balmoral Street provides access to existing businesses in the area. Institutional land use within the area includes Lakehead University, Evangel Church, Grassroots Church and the City of Thunder Bay Police Services Station. 2.6 Terrestrial Habitat No species at risk have been identified within the corridor, and there is not a significant amount of clearing to be completed for the proposed works. 2.7 Water-Crossings / Fisheries Habitat There is one water-crossing within the limits of this project, the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway that would be subject to the Lakehead Region Conservation Authority’s (LRCA) Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulations . The LRCA own and maintain the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway, including the Diversion Structure, portions of the Neebing River banks, the banks and bed of the Diversion Channel and the widened deepened Floodway channel out into Lake Superior. Notification was received from the LRCA in December of 2015 that in general, any development within the approximate regulated area may require a permit under the Authority Regulations. 2.8 Problem and Opportunity Statement The existing road surface along this section of Balmoral Street has reached a deteriorated condition since the last resurfacing improvements that were carried out between the mid 80’s to early 90’s. Traffic volumes have increased and additional traffic control measures are 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 9 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 required for turning movements at intersections. There is an existing gap in the City’s Active Transportation Plan for a multi-use trail between the north and south section of Balmoral Street. There is an opportunity to rehabilitate and reconstruct the roadway structure along with geometric, active transportation and storm water improvements. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 10 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 3. Alternatives to the Undertaking 3.1 Identification of Alternative Solutions Based on the review of the Problem and Opportunity Statement, the following alternative solutions were developed and evaluated during the Class EA process. These alternatives include: Do nothing Resurface the roadway maintaining existing geometrics Complete intersection improvements Full roadway reconstruction as well as completing intersection improvements 3.2 Planning Alternatives Criteria and Evaluation The evaluation criteria listed below were developed following the requirements and guidelines of the Municipal Class EA document, and include comments received during the consultation process. Transportation Service Intersection capacity Traffic safety Transit operations Accommodation of pedestrians and cyclists Natural Environment Neebing-McIntyre Floodway Stormwater drainage Social Impacts Community Growth Engineering Utility relocation Capital costs Operating costs The planning alternatives were evaluated based on the ability of the alternative to address the problem statement, including impacts to transportation and environmental impacts. 3.3 Impact Assessment 3.3.1 Alternative 1: Do Nothing The ‘Do Nothing’ alternative does not address existing capacity deficiencies and safety issues with turning movements at intersections. It also does not address the deteriorated condition of the roadway, existing roadway and property drainage and lack of active transportation facilities. Therefore, this alternative will not be evaluated further. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 11 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 3.3.2 Alternative 2: Resurface the Balmoral Street Roadway The alternative of resurfacing Balmoral Street roadway will address the deteriorated condition of the roadway. However, it does not address the capacity deficiencies and safety issues with the turning movements at intersections, existing roadway and property drainage concerns and lack of active transportation facilities. Therefore, this alternative will not be evaluated further. 3.3.3 Alternative 3: Complete Intersection Improvements The alternative of completing intersection improvements will address the additional capacity required for turning movements. However, it does not address the deteriorated condition of the roadway, existing roadway and property drainage concerns and lack of active transportation facilities. Therefore, this alternative will not be evaluated further. 3.3.4 Alternative 4: Full Roadway Reconstruction, Intersection Improvements and Active Transportation Connectivity Full roadway reconstruction to an urban design cross-section and completing intersection improvements has the capacity to address existing and projected traffic volumes for turning movements at intersections. The implementation of an active transportation trail will provide connectivity to the existing trail network on the north and south limits. Also, to address storm water management, the implementation of green infrastructure and low impact developments will be introduced. This alternative will address all the issues noted in the Problem and Opportunity Statement. 3.3.4.1 Impact on Natural Environment Much of the area (mainly for the boulevards) to be constructed is old natural vegetation, secondary growth and grass cover. Roadway related storm drainage facilities will collect storm water and discharge it to the existing Neebing-McIntyre Floodway. A bio-retention/bio-filtration drainage swale and catch basin system will be implemented along the City’s right-of-way to ensure positive drainage along the low lying properties along the corridor. Sediment and erosion control devices will be constructed at the discharge point to the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway, the details of which will be confirmed during detailed design and the necessary permits obtained from the LRCA. 3.3.4.2 Impact on Social Environment The existing roadway platform will be retained with boulevards being filled in to facilitate active transportation facilities. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 12 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 3.3.4.3 Utilities The existing Thunder Bay Hydro poles along the entire east side of the corridor will be impacted by the proposed roadway reconstruction, mainly due to the implementation of active transportation facilities in the boulevard. The alignment of the existing hydro poles is not the concern; it is the filling/cutting activities around each pole required to build the active transportation facilities. Almost all of the existing poles will have a cut/fill greater than 0.2m with several with 1.0m or greater which warrant a pole replacement. Thunder Bay Hydro (TBH) will upgrade their facilities as part of the relocations. Thunder Bay Telephone and Shaw Cable have aerial plants on the existing Thunder Bay Hydro poles, and will relocate their plant as part of the TBH relocations. 3.4 Recommended Planning Alternative Balmoral Street is an important transportation corridor in the City of Thunder Bay. It provides a north-south link to many businesses in the City of Thunder Bay’s intercity area. Providing adequate capacity in this corridor is critical to planning for the economic growth and well-being of the City. Based on the assessment and evaluation of the alternatives to the undertaking, the preferred and recommended planning solution is Alternative 4, full roadway reconstruction complete with intersection improvements, implementation of active transportation facilities and implementation of storm water management measures. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 13 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 4. Alternative Designs The preferred planning alternative is to reconstruct the full roadway along the corridor. This section provides a review and summary of several design alternatives. 4.1 Key Features of the Recommended Planning Alternative Major features of the recommended planning alternative include the following: Construction of a full urban road cross-section including the implementation of concrete curb and gutter, storm sewers and landscaped boulevards. Geometric improvements at the Balmoral Street/Harbour Expressway including increased storage lanes and widening the intersection to facilitate double left-turn lanes, as warranted. Traffic movement safety improvements at the Balmoral Street/Hewitson Street and Balmoral Street/Amber Drive intersections, as warranted. Integration of a new multi-use trail along Balmoral Street consistent with the City’s Active Transportation Plan. Storm water drainage improvements by means of green infrastructure, low impact development and piped storm sewers. 4.2 Design Criteria The following geometric design criteria were developed using the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Geometric Design Manual (GDM) guidelines and City of Thunder Bay Standards and were followed during the planning of this project. Harbour Expressway Design speeds = 70 km/h for northbound (NBL) and southbound (SBL) lanes, 80 km/h for eastbound lanes (EBL) and westbound lanes (WBL) Lane widths = 3.75 m EBL and WBL = 3.50 m NBL and SBL Balmoral Street – from the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway northerly to Lithium Drive Design speed = 70 km/h Lane widths = 3.50 m, and the curb lane = 4.5 m Balmoral Street – from Lithium Drive northerly to Beverly Street Design speed = 60 km/h Lane widths = 3.50 m, and the curb lane = 4.5 m 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 14 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 4.2.1 Roadway Alignment The right of way width along the Balmoral Street is generally 30m wide from the NeebingMcIntyre Floodway to Beverly Street. The existing centerline of the road was retained. The vertical alignment was reviewed with respect to the City of Thunder Bay and TAC guidelines, and it was confirmed that the existing alignment is well within the standards. Therefore, there are no modifications proposed to the vertical alignment, other than minor adjustments to accommodate the recommended pavement strategy and to ensure positive drainage on the roadway curb and gutter system. 4.2.2 Concrete Curb & Gutter and Storm Drainage Concrete curb and gutter is proposed to be constructed along both sides of the roadway which is consistent with the City of Thunder Standards for an urban roadway. Storm drainage will be provided by a piped storm sewer system, which will allow the retirement of the existing roadside ditches in this area. Two bio-retention/bio-filtration swales will be constructed in areas where the new boulevard and existing low lying properties exist. The roadside drainage along the section of Balmoral Street between William Street and the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway will remain as open ditch. This open ditch will improve the water quality entering the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway by providing valuable filtering of the storm water through vegetation. 4.2.3 Active Transportation The City has developed an overall Active Transportation Plan which identifies Commuter Routes and Recreational Trails. The Balmoral Street corridor is identified as a commuter route between the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway and Beverly Street. The volume/demand for separate commuter cyclist facilities is not high enough to warrant the addition of both an active transportation trail and commuter lanes. Existing active transportation trails terminate at the southerly and northerly limits of the study area, leaving a gap along the Balmoral Street corridor without any means of safe pedestrian travel. The proposed design will incorporate an active transportation trail on the east and west sides of the roadway, enabling pedestrian connectivity to side streets and businesses along the entire corridor. The City roads department is currently looking to incorporating snow removal and winter maintenance along the active transportation trail into their budget. A connection between the active transportation trail/sidewalk and existing businesses is feasible with the expression of interest from businesses on a case-by-case basis. This will be included with the Notice of Completion of the EA. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 15 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 The addition of a connection along Sibley Drive from the new active transportation trail to the existing active transportation trail within the Confederation College property will be a provisional item, provided there is room in the budget. The appropriate trail/pedestrian signage will be installed in accordance to the Ontario Traffic Manual (OTM) requirements for Cycling Facilities and Pedestrian Crossings (Book 18 & 15). CTB is currently in the process of developing a program for the possibility of future installation of mid-block pedestrian crossings. The release of an educational program for mid-block pedestrian crossings is expected in 2016. The possibility of installing inlet basins or curb bubbles as an alternative to traditional curb and gutter catch basins along the roadway will not be considered through this corridor, as active transportation trails are being implemented on both the east and west sides of the roadway. Accessible rest areas with benches will be included intermittently along both sides of the length of the project as per AODA requirements and with the guidance of the Built Environment Accessible Standards. 4.2.4 Pavement Rehabilitation DST Consulting Engineers completed the geotechnical investigation for the project. The Geotechnical Report dated August 2015 recommends pavement structure rehabilitation consisting of performing in place processing to reclaim the existing pavement to its full depth followed by placement of 50mm of Granular ‘A’ distribution for grading and cross fall purposes, and finishing the process by placing 120mm of either Superpave or HL4 asphalt on top of the Granular ‘A’. 4.2.5 Intersection Improvements All of the signalized intersections will be designed in compliance with OTM Book 15 for Pedestrian Crossing Facilities and OTM Book 18 for Cyclist Facilities, as well as in accordance with the requirements under the AODA. Balmoral Street & Harbour Expressway Intersection The merge lanes onto and off of the Harbour Expressway will be designed to meet the required specifications as per the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC ) Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads. To alleviate the proposed concerns with the addition of double left turn lanes, the following points have been considered: 353364 The intersection design is based on peak traffic flows (current and projected over the lifespan of the intersection) in order to maintain functionality through the intersections Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 16 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 presently and in the future. The double left turns are required to meet the increase in vehicular traffic and to allow the intersection to operate at a safe level of service. The intersection design will include controlled left turns, restricting through-left movements that would conflict with pedestrian/cyclist crossing. Countdown pedestrian signals will be incorporated to prevent pedestrians from crossing without adequate time to reach the opposite side. The intersection dimensions will increase by 3.5m, a minimal distance that will be accounted for when programming the timing of the signals. This is expected to improve the flow of traffic through the intersection, ultimately reducing the wait times for drivers. The right turn radius of a tractor trailer must be able to safely make the turn without impeding into the inside lane and/or going over the curb. This will be considered when completing the final design with regards to reconfiguring the ramps with tighter radii to slow vehicles and provide a further line of sight to pedestrian crossings. The geometrics of the Harbour Expressway intersection in combination with the Sibley/Hewitson intersections are too close together to consider the integration of wide radius corners and the removal of right turn ramps. The implementation of the City of Thunder Bay’s first roundabout into a higher speed, high traffic area is not feasible. The ideal location for a pilot project would likely be a residential, lower speed/traffic area. A roundabout in this area would not be pedestrian-friendly due to the large volume of truck traffic and the lack of public education on the proper use of a roundabout. Uncontrolled Intersections All of the unsignalized intersections will be designed in compliance with the OTM Book 15 for Pedestrian Crossing Facilities and OTM Book 18 for Cyclist Facilities, as well as in accordance with the requirements under the AODA. The Jasper Drive and Lithium Street intersection geometrics will remain unchanged. 4.2.6 Beautification & Landscaping Trees will be planted along the corridor where space permits. Climate tolerant vegetation is proposed to be implemented along the design fore slopes of the boulevard. Consultations with the City Forester and the City Parks Department will take place during detailed design with regards to these measures. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 17 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Green Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development (LID) measures and practices will also be incorporated where both functionally and economically feasible to compliment standard storm water management plans with the goal of reducing the storm water impact on the underground storm system and improving runoff quality and quantity. GI practices will be included throughout the length of the project with the goal of improving the quality of the environment by reducing air pollutants and noise emissions as well as beautifying the natural environment and enhancing the biodiversity along the corridor. The high water table in the limits of the project greatly affect the ability to implement certain LID measures in regards to water retention/storage. The water table reduces the available vertical storage throughout the project, ensuing additional costs to incorporate many of these options which ultimately eliminates their feasibility. In the event of a rainstorm, the massive volume of water and the high flows attributed to the drainage areas that will flow into the storm water system along this corridor will not be reduced to a large enough degree to warrant the financial expenditure of implementing retention areas. Upon recommendation from the Earth Care Sustainability Plan and the Urban Design Guidelines, some of the LID techniques that will be incorporated into this project include, grassed areas, bio-retention/bio-filtration swales and maintaining the existing open ditches that reside south of William Street with flows entering the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway. The existing open ditches that will remain along the section of Balmoral Street between William Street and the NeebingMcIntyre Floodway will aid in storm water retention directly preceding water distribution into the Floodway. Pedestrian facilities (recycling/waste receptacles, rest areas) will be considered with reference to the Earth Care Sustainability Plan and the Clean, Green & Beautiful policy and in compliance with the AODA requirements. Options to incorporate GI into the islands of the Harbour Expressway intersection as an alternative to the traditional asphalt islands will be investigated and incorporated if economically feasible. 4.2.7 Roadway Lighting Street lighting along the corridor will be reviewed and upgraded as necessary to meet current standards. Existing hydro poles will be utilized where practical for mounting the street lighting arms. LED lighting will be installed on any new poles as required. The existing lighting will remain as is on existing poles that are not replaced. Lighting will be installed at all transit stops and pedestrian crossings to meet the guidelines and requirements of the Thunder Bay Transit Master Plan, City of Thunder Bay (CTB) Multi-Year Accessibility Plan and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 18 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 4.2.8 Transit The proposed design supports and references the Thunder Bay Transit Master Plan. Transit facilities will be in compliance with the City of Thunder Bay 2013-2018 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, meeting the requirements of the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation under the AODA as a designated public sector organization (effective January 1, 2016). Transit will be consulted during the detailed design phase to ensure that any future transit stop locations will be considered in the current design to minimize future construction interruptions. Connections from the sidewalk/ATT to all transit stops is a requirement under the AODA and will be included in the detailed design where required. 4.2.9 Accessibility All components of the design will be in compliance with the City of Thunder Bay 2013-2018 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan, meeting the requirements of the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation under the AODA as a designated public sector organization (effective January 1, 2016). Future AODA requirements will be considered during the design of the project (pedestrian crossing educational program beginning in 2016, future bus shelter installations, etc.). The design for all exterior routes (sidewalks, ramps, connections, etc.) will be done with reference to Sections 5 and 8 of the Final Proposed Accessible Built Environment Standard and in compliance with the relevant AODA requirements. Consideration will be given to the location of the sidewalk/ATT and the safety of mobility device users with respect to the possibility of spills, tips or getting caught on lips or trip edges. The roadway, sidewalk facilities and the active transportation trail will include provisions for access for physically restricted persons by way of sloped curbs and entrance ways, and ramped sidewalks and paths, which allow for maximum access and ease of movement. 4.2.10 Additional Considerations The impact of increased traffic volumes to the surrounding areas as a result of detours will be considered during the next phase of the design. During construction, the construction and project management team will be in constant communication with the surrounding business owners with regards to future construction delays/sequences that may affect potential customers. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 19 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 The CTB Engineering Division will coordinate the construction of this project with other local improvement projects and/or other roadwork in the immediate vicinity to avoid overlapping traffic detour impacts. The placement of manholes to avoid the wheel track will be considered during both the detailed design and construction phases. The following plans, policies, guidelines and standards (and any other applicable documents) will be referenced and implemented where possible throughout all components of the detailed design: Final Proposed Accessible Built Environment Standard Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act Ontario Traffic Manual Book 15 for Pedestrian Crossing Facilities Ontario Traffic Manual Book 18 for Cyclist Facilities Urban Forest Management Plan Storm Water Master Plan draft EarthCare Sustainability Plan City of Thunder Bay 2013-2018 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan Urban Design Guidelines Active Transportation Plan Clean, Green & Beautiful policy 4.2.11 Preliminary Design Drawings and Concepts The proposed improvements to the Balmoral Street corridor between the NeebingMcIntyre River and Beverly Street in previous sections are further presented in the preliminary design drawings and concepts shown in Appendix C. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 20 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 5. Project Description 5.1 Description of Elements of the Project The improvements to Balmoral Street are summarized as follows: Full pavement rehabilitation Concrete curb and gutter along the entire study area Piped storm sewers and storm water drainage improvements Geometric improvements at the Harbour Expressway including the implementation of dual left-turns The implementation of a partial median at the Hewitson Street/Sibley Drive and Alloy Drive/Amber Drive intersections Active transportation trail on both sides of the reconstructed roadway Landscaping including grassed areas, bioswales and tree planting Street lighting improvements Utility relocations 5.2 Construction Staging The project is anticipated to be completed in several stages, generally estimated as follows: Stage 1 – Year 2016 From the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway northerly to Alloy Drive/Amber Drive intersection (including the geometric modifications at the Harbour Expressway intersection) Stage 2 – Year 2017 From the Alloy Drive/Amber Drive intersection northerly to Central Avenue Stage 3 – Year 2014 From Central Avenue northerly to the Beverly Street intersection The extent and timing of the various stages may vary pending available funding. 5.3 Estimated Project Costs Project costs were estimated based on preliminary designs and concepts. Below is an outline of the current preliminary cost estimates for Stages 1, 2 and 3. STAGE 353364 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Stage 1 – Year 2016 (including Harbour Expressway) $4,200,000 Stage 2 – Year 2017 $1,200,000 Stage 3 – Year 2018 $3,500,000 TOTAL $8,900,000 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 21 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 It is anticipated that this project will be funded by the tax supported budget including applications to provincial and federal governments. 5.4 Approvals The following approvals will be required prior to construction of the works: Ministry of the Environment, per OCWA Section 53 for the storm sewers. Lakehead Region Conservation Authority – storm sewer discharges to the NeebingMcIntyre Floodway. 5.5 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures The City of Thunder Bay Engineering Development Standards, 2010 was referenced to complete this section of the report. The work for environmental protection, including the management and disposal of excess materials, control of water in dewatering, temporary erosion control measures and the use of explosives is covered in Section 01561 of the manual. Below is a summary of pertinent environmental considerations for this project. 5.5.1 Noise Impacts During construction the Contractor will control noise emission from equipment and plant to local authorities’ noise emission requirements. Construction hours may also be limited to minimize impacts on the surrounding environment. 5.5.2 Water Crossings The effects resulting from municipal transportation projects including the alteration of composition of the vegetation through the loss of topsoil, removing/disturbing significant trees and/or ground flora, and the increased exposure of trees in the right-ofway can result in habitat loss for wildlife. Mitigating measures to reduce the potential for adverse environmental effects include replacing topsoil, providing a buffer zone and minimizing tree removal. There is no work in-water anticipated for proposed works for this project at any of the water crossings, and erosion and sediment control measures will be utilized to ensure materials generated during construction activities do not affect the waterways. 5.5.3 Erosion and Sediment Control The potential for erosion or sedimentation in this project is minimal. The project does not involve any significant earth works and no large areas will be exposed. Potential areas for erosion include culvert replacement/extensions, storm sewer outlets/outfalls and culvert and ditch cleanouts. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 22 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 Sediment controls, typically silt fence, will be installed at those locations to mitigate sedimentation. These efforts will be in addition to any monitoring requirements identified by the regulatory agencies such as the MOE, MNR and the Lakehead Region Conservation Authority. 5.5.4 Air Quality Impacts The effects of construction on air quality must be addressed to ensure the protection of public health. All emissions must comply with Ministry of environment guidelines. Mitigating measures during construction include utilizing water trucks for dust suppression as needed and limiting on site stockpiles. 5.5.5 Emergency Spill Response Direct responsibility for containment and cleanup of spills and abandoned material rests with the owner of the material and person in control of the material at the time of the spill or abandonment. 5.5.6 Waste Management Management and disposal of excess materials will follow guidelines as set in Ontario Provincial Standard Specification (OPSS) 180. 5.5.7 Heritage and Archaeological During the construction activities should any heritage or archaeological artifacts be identified, the work on site will stop immediately and the appropriate authorities will be notified. The site or area of the discovery will be separated and secured until the investigation is complete. 5.5.8 Accessibility Accessibility for the public will be maintained during construction. This includes provisions of temporary walkways, driveway accesses, pathways, etc. Access for emergency vehicles will be provided at all times. 5.5.9 Monitoring Environmental commitments made during this study are monitored during and after construction. The construction administration staffs check for compliance with design and construction commitments in environmental assessment documentation. The monitoring will include any requirements identified by the regulatory agencies such as the MOE, MNR and the LRCA. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 23 City of Thunder Bay Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction Project File Update: January 2016 6. Conclusion 6.1 Conclusions The preferred planning alternative for this study is to complete full roadway reconstruction including intersection improvements and implementation of active transportation facilities. 6.2 Class EA Status The filing of this of Schedule B Project File on the public record marks the conclusion of Phase 4 of the Municipal Engineers Association Class Environmental Assessment process for this study. Subject to any comments received during the review period, and assuming that no Part II order requests are submitted, the project will be considered to be approved under the Class EA. The City of Thunder Bay may then proceed to the detailed design and implementation stages. 353364 Hatch Mott MacDonald Page 24 APPENDIX A: Public Comment Invited Notice Letter to Property/Business Owners Complete Mailing Lists City of Thunder Bay Class Environmental Assessment Improvements to Balmoral Street from the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway north to Beverly Street Public Comment Invited The City has identified deficiencies in the Balmoral Street corridor between the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway Bridge and Beverly Street. The existing road surface has reached a deteriorated condition since the last resurfacing improvements that were carried out between the mid 80’s to early 90’s. Vehicular traffic volumes have increased and the lack of sidewalks is a concern with pedestrian safety in the area. The City is therefore considering the following alternatives as solutions to the problem: Do-Nothing; Resurface the Roadway; Complete Intersection Improvements; Full Roadway Reconstruction including implementation of storm sewer, intersection improvements and boulevard construction complete with sidewalk and active transportation trail (preliminary preferred solution). In accordance with the requirements for Schedule B projects of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, preliminary study material and plans will be available for review at the offices of the consulting engineer. Information is also available on the City’s and the Consultants website: www.thunderbay.ca website: www.enl-tbay.com/balmoral.html. For further details on this project, or to inspect a copy of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment, please contact: Joseph De Luca, P. Eng., Project Engineer Hatch Mott MacDonald 301-200 S. Syndicate Avenue Thunder Bay, ON P7E 1C9 Telephone (807) 625-8707 e-mail: joseph.deluca@hatchmott.com Public input and comments are invited, for incorporation into the planning and design of this project, and will be received until December 2nd, 2015. Subject to comments received and the receipt of necessary approvals, the City of Thunder Bay intends to proceed with the planning, design and construction of this project by mid-2016. This Notice issued October 31, 2015. Mike Vogrig, P. Eng. Project Engineer City of Thunder Bay October 31, 2015 «NameOwner» «Address» «City», «Prov» «PostalCode» Dear Sir/Madam: RE: Public Comment Invited Improvements to Balmoral Street The City of Thunder Bay has retained Hatch Mott MacDonald for the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment of proposed improvements to the Balmoral Street corridor between the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway and Beverly Street. The purpose of this letter is to introduce the study and invite any comments or concerns you may have about the project. The Public Comment Invited notice is attached which includes a location map and details about the project. If you have any comments or concerns or would like additional information about the study, please contact Hatch Mott MacDonald as indicated in the notice. Sincerely, Joseph De Luca, P. Eng. Project Engineer Enclosure cc: 353364 Mike Vogrig, P.Eng., City of Thunder Bay J. De Luca, HMM/file Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Summary of Contacts Ministries Aboriginal Affairs Environment & Climate Change Municipal Affairs & Housing Natural Resources & Forestry Transportation Aboriginal Groups Fort William First Nation Métis Nation of Ontario – Head Office Métis Nation of Ontario – Thunder Bay Council Red Sky Métis Independent Nation Ministries Hatch Mott MacDonald Utilities Tbay Tel Shaw Union Gas Thunder Bay Hydro Hydro One Bell TELUS MTS Allstream City of Thunder Bay (see list below) Mayor Council Other Community Economic Development Commission Conservation Authority Student Transportation Services CONTACT DEAR COMMENT Rachael Manson-Smith, Senior Advisor Aboriginal Relations and Ministry Partnerships Division Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs 9th Floor, 160 Bloor Street East Toronto ON M7A 2E6 Ms. Manson-Smith A copy of this notice has also been sent to: Fort William First Nation, the Métis Consultation Unit, the Thunder Bay Métis Council and the Red Sky Métis Independent Nation. Carrie Hutchinson, Environmental Planner/EA Coordinator Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change 435 James St. S., Suite 331 Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S7 Ms. Hutchinson Ms. Shannon Dodd Smith, Manager Community Planning and Development Municipal Services Office – North (Thunder Bay) Ministry of Municipal Affairs & Housing 435 James Street South, Suite 223 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Ms. Dodd Smith 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Aboriginal Groups Hatch Mott MacDonald Rik Aikman, Resources Operations Supervisor Thunder Bay District Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Ontario Government Building Suite B001, 435 James Street South Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6E3 Mr. Aikman Iain Galloway, Manager, Engineering Office Northwestern Region Ministry of Transportation 615 South James Street, P.O. Box 1177 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6P6 Mr. Galloway Chief Peter Collins Fort William First Nation Suite 200, 90 Anemki Dr. Thunder Bay, ON P7J 1L3 Chief Collins Métis Consultation Unit Métis Nation of Ontario Head Office 500 Old St. Patrick Street, Unit D Ottawa, ON K1N 9G4 Sir/Madam Bryanna Scott, President Métis Nation of Ontario Thunder Bay Métis Council 226 May St. S. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 1B4 Ms. Scott Red Sky Métis Independent Nation 406 E. Victoria Ave. Thunder Bay, ON P7C 1A5 Sir/Madam The Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs has previously recommended that we contact your office to notify the appropriate Métis communities that may have an interest in this project. A copy of this Notice has also been sent to the Thunder Bay Métis Council and the Red Sky Métis Independent Nation. 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Emergency Service Providers Utilities Hatch Mott MacDonald Thunder Bay Police Service 1200 Balmoral St. Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5Z5 Sir/Madam City of Thunder Bay Fire & Rescue Services 330 Vickers St. N. Thunder Bay, ON P7C 4B2 Sir/Madam Superior North Emergency Medical Services HEADQUARTERS 401 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V1 Sir/Madam Paul Mascarin TBay Tel OPE Specialist TBayTel 1050 Lithium Drive Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6G3 Mr. Mascarin John Komar Shaw System Planner Shaw Cable 1635 Paquette Rd. Thunder Bay, ON P7G 2J2 Mr. Komar Don McClusky Union Gas 1211 Amber Drive Thunder Bay, ON P7A 8B2 Mr. McClusky Don Zimak, V.P. Power Systems Thunder Bay Hydro Power Systems Division 34 Cumberland St. N. Thunder Bay, ON P7A 4L4 Mr. Zimak 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Bishop Racicot HydroOne P.O. Box 10309 255 Burwood Rd Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6T8 Mr. Racicot Bell Canada 229 Vickers St. S. Thunder Bay, ON P7B6T8 City of Thunder Bay Hatch Mott MacDonald Eros Spadotto, Executive Vice-President, Technology Strategy TELUS Corporation 510 W. Georgia St., 23rd Floor Vancouver, BC V6B 0M3 Mr. Spadotto Chief Technology & Information Officer MTS Allstream P.O. Box 6666 333 Main Street Winnipeg, MN R3C 3V6 Sir/Madam Kayla Dixon, Director – Engineering City of Thunder Bay Infrastructure & Operations Engineering Division Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Ms. Dixon Mark Smith – General Manager City of Thunder Bay Development & Emergency Services Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Mr. Smith 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Hatch Mott MacDonald John Hannam, City Clerk City of Thunder Bay Corporate Services Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Mr. Hannam Kerri Marshall, Manager – Environment City of Thunder Bay Infrastructure & Operations Environment Division Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Ms. Marshall Darrell Matson, General Manager City of Thunder Bay Infrastructure & Operations Administration Division Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Mr. Matson Brad Adams, Manager – Roads City of Thunder Bay Infrastructure & Operations Roads Division Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Mr. Adams Adam Krupper, Active Transportation Coordinator City of Thunder Bay Transportation & Works Department Engineering Division Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Mr. Krupper 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Hatch Mott MacDonald Paul Fayrick, Manager of Parks City of Thunder Bay Community Services Parks Division Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Avenue South P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Mr. Fayrick Brad Loroff, Manager – Transit City of Thunder Bay Transportation & Works Department Transit Division 570 Fort William Rd. Thunder Bay, ON P7B 2Z8 Mr. Loroff Shelley Vescio City Forester City of Thunder Bay Community Services – Parks 111 S. Syndicate Ave. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S4 Ms. Vescio Ron Furioso Capital Projects Supervisor P.O. Box 800 Thunder Bay, ON P7C5K4 Mr. Furioso Sarah Kerton, HBES, BEd, MNRM Community Environmental Action Plan Coordinator Environment Division, Victoriaville Civic Centre 111 Syndicate Ave. S. PO Box 800 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7C 5K4 Ms. Kerton Mayor Keith Hobbs City of Thunder Bay 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Mayor Hobbs 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Hatch Mott MacDonald Andrew Foulds Member of Council, Current River Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Foulds Trevor Giertuga Member of Council, McIntyre Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Giertuga Paul Pugh Member of Council, McKellar Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Pugh Linda Rydholm Member of Council, Neebing Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Rydholm Shelby Ch’ng Member of Council, Northwood Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Ch’ng Brian McKinnon Member of Council, Red River Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor McKinnon 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Hatch Mott MacDonald Joe Virdiramo Member of Council, Westfort Ward Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Virdiramo Iain Angus Member of Council Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Angus Rebecca Johnson Member of Council Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Johnson Larry Hebert Member of Council Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Hebert Frank Pullia Member of Council Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Pullia Aldo Ruberto Member of Council Office of the City Clerk City Hall, 500 Donald St. E. Thunder Bay, ON P7E 5V3 Councilor Ruberto 353364 Mailing List – Balmoral Road Improvements/Reconstruction Municipal Class EA August 2015 – Notice of Study Other T. Douglas Murray, CEO The Thunder Bay Community Economic Development Commission (CEDC) Customer Contact Centre and Transportation P.O. Box 800 Suite 201, 34 Cumberland Street North Thunder Bay, ON P7C 5K4 Mr. Demmings Tammy Cook, Watershed Manager Lakehead Region Conservation Authority P.O. Box 10427 130 Conservation Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6T8 Ms. Cook Student Transportation Services of Thunder Bay Suite 2001, 715 Hewitson St. Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6B5 Hatch Mott MacDonald 353364 Balmoral Road Reconstruction Property Owners Mailing List Name/Owner Lakehead University Board of Governors The Trustees of Grass Roots Church Greek Orthodox Community Of The Holy Trinity The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada C/O GARY WILSON Handicapped Action Group Inc Corporation of the City of Thunder Bay Address 955 OLIVER RD City THUNDER BAY Prov ON PostalCode P7B 5El Re Property 955 Oliver Rd 1250 BALMORAL ST 651 BEVERLY ST Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 5Z5 P7B 6N2 1250 Balmoral St 651 Beverly St 1260 BALMORAL ST Thunder Bay ON P7B 5Z5 1260 Balmoral St 1201 JASPER DR SUITE A 500 DONALD ST E Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 6R2 P7C 5K4 1526454 Ontario Limited Northco Partners Group Inc 601 SQUIER ST 1001 WILLIAM ST SUITE 101B 1184 ROLAND ST SUITE 600 1048 BALMORAL ST 1001 WILLIAM ST SUITE 10lB 1164 ROLAND ST 1154 ROLAND ST Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B4A7 P7B 6M1 1201 Jasper Dr 750 Tungsten St 1200 Balmoral St 1130 Lithium Dr 1131 Lithium Dr 1131 Alloy Dr 1204 Roland St 1001 William St Thunder Bay ON P7B 5M4 Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 5T9 P7B 6M1 1184 Roland St 1118 Roland St 1174 Roland St 1001 William St 302 Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 5M4 P7B 5M4 1164 Roland St 1154 Roland St 739 HAROLD CRES 1001 WILLIAM ST SUITE lOlB 200 PORTAGE AVE SUITE 403 Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7C 5H8 P7B 6MI 1142 Roland St 1134 Roland St Winnepeg MB R3C 3X2 745 Hewitson St, Thunder Bay, ON 1126 MAHOGANY PL 1001 WILLIAM ST FLOOR 1 BOX 2718 STNM 615 MCLEOD TRAIL S UNIT 700 Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Calgary ON ON AB P7K OA3 P7B 6M1 T2P 3C2 1126 Roland St 615 Sibley Or 1048 Balmoral St Northco Realty Group Ltd 1062842 Ontario Inc Northco Management 2000 Inc 1358829 Ontario Ltd. 1062842 Ontario Inc C/O AUTO HOME PAINTS (THUNDER BAY) LIMITED KA Whent Inc Panda Bay Estates (1990) Ltd Bank Of Nova Scotia C/O MAN & NWO CENTR ACCTG UNIT 988429 Ontario Ltd Northco Harbour Land Limited 2042728 Ontario Inc 353364 Balmoral Road Reconstruction Property Owners Mailing List Aldo-Mar Holdings Ltd Dunpar Management Ltd Lakehead Region Conservation Authority McBus Holdings Limited Thunder Bay Husky Travel Centre 353364 BALMORAL COMPLEX 1081 BARTON ST 1095 BARTON ST PO BOX 10427 Thunder Bay ON P7B 5N3 1081 Barton St Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 5N3 P7B 6T8 1095 Barton St 958 Balmoral St 1121 BARTON ST 1120 Alloy Dr. Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 5N3 P7B 5W3 1121 Barton St 1120 Alloy Dr. Balmoral Road Reconstruction Property Owners – ROLAND ST & BARTON ST. Mailing List Note – this list was sent out on November 24, 2015 (additional property owners added as per the City of Thunder Bay) Name/Owner Mastrangelo Fuels 1670747 Ontario Inc SUNCOR ENERGY PRODUCTS. PARTNER TAXA North West Hydraulics Ltd Norm McKinnon 1796612 Ontario Inc W Waite Holdings Inc Pierce Florcraft Ltd Wolseley Canada Inc 1304827 Ontario Ltd. 1304828 Ontario Ltd. 1902033 Ontario Ltd Bu Duncan Enterprises Inc 1333440 Ontario Ltd 1526454 Ontario Limited Northco Realty Group Ltd 1062842 Ontario Inc 1358829 Ontario Ltd. 1062842 Ontario Inc C/O AUTO HOME PAINTS (THUNDER BAY) K A Whent Inc Panda Bay Estates (1990) Ltd 988429 Ontario Ltd Northco Realty Group Ltd 2042728 Ontario Inc Aldo-Mar Holdings Ltd Dunpar Management Ltd McBus Holdings Limited 353364 Address 3275 REBECCA AVE City Oakville Prov ON PostalCode L6L 6N5 Re Property 1095 ROLAND ST 1105 ROLAND ST 1125 ROLAND ST PO BOX 10519 1141 ROLAND ST 880 LAURENTIAN DR 1165 ROLAND ST THUNDER BAY Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON ON ON ON ON ON P7B 5M5 P7B 5M5 P7B 5M5 P7B 6T9 P7B 5M5 L7N 3V6 P7B 5M5 1095 Roland St 1105 Roland St 1173 ROLAND ST 2225 LACEWOOD DR 665 HEWITSON ST 601 SQUIER ST 1184 ROLAND ST SUITE 600 1048 BALMORAL ST 1164 ROLAND ST 1154 ROLAND ST Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON ON ON ON P7B 5M5 P7K 1C4 P7B 5V5 P7B 4A7 P7B 5M4 1173 Roland St 1177 Roland St 1185 Roland St 1204 Roland St 1184 Roland St Thunder Bay Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON ON P7B 5T9 P7B 5M4 P7B 5M4 1174 Roland St 1164 Roland St 1154 Roland St 739 HAROLD CRES 1001 WILLIAM ST SUITE 101B 1126 MAHOGANY PL 1184 ROLAND ST SUITE 600 BOX 2718 STN M 615 MCLEOD TRAIL S UNIT 700 Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7C 5H8 P7B 6M1 1142 Roland St 1134 Roland St Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7K 0A3 P7B 5M4 1126 Roland St 1118 Roland St Calgary AB T2P 3C2 1048 Balmoral St BALMORAL COMPLEX 1081 BARTON ST 1095 BARTON ST 1121 BARTON ST Thunder Bay ON P7B 5N3 1081 Barton St Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7B 5N3 P7B 5N3 1095 Barton St 720 Hewitson St 1125 ROLAND ST 1135 Roland St 1141 Roland St 1149 Roland St 1165 Roland St 1121 Barton St Balmoral Road Reconstruction Property Owners – ROLAND ST & BARTON ST. Mailing List Note – this list was sent out on November 24, 2015 (additional property owners added as per the City of Thunder Bay) 2182568 Ontario Inc Thunder Bay Real Estate Board The Canadian Red Cross Society FAT KATS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD. Jeffrey James Clara Clara Real Estate Ltd Howardson John Jr Trustee Peterson Elizabeth A Trustee Habib Ahsanul Trustee Curans Health Centre Corp Thunder Bay Husky Travel Centre 353364 394 GERTRUDE AVE SUITE 301 1135 BARTON ST 5700 CANCROSS CT 1151 BARTON ST SUITE 101 35 JEWELL ST WINNIPEG MB R3L 0M6 1127 Barton St Thunder Bay P7B 5N3 L5R 3E9 P7B 5N3 1141 Barton St Thunder Bay ON ON ON Thunder Bay ON P7A 6H5 1151 Barton St 947 BLIND CREEK DR Thunder Bay ON P7A 0C6 1151 Barton St 169 AUTUMNWOOD DR 1120 Alloy Dr. Thunder Bay Thunder Bay ON ON P7A 3L4 P7B5W3 1165 Barton St MISSISSAUGA 1145 Barton St 1151 Barton St 1120 Alloy Dr APPENDIX B: Environmental Assessment Communication Log City of Thunder Bay Balmoral Street Reconstruction Environmental Assessment Communication Log Date Organization 4-Nov-15 4-Nov-15 4-Nov-15 5-Nov-15 The Balmoral St. Neighbourhood Group The Balmoral St. Neighbourhood Group Position Comments / Questions / Concerns Response Provided Resident HMM received an email - Her email reads, Dear Mr. De Luca, I support a Full Roadway Reconstruction of Balmoral. It is overdue. Thank you for your professional tact and solution to this much needed improvement. Reciept of email sent via email. Representative / Resident Came by the office of HMM - his group would like to see both sides of Balmoral include an active transportation trail. Also indicated a interest in providing input during the design of the project. Stated he was going to forward information regarding active transportation trails and also forward a letter that his group had previously submitted to City regarding active transportation trails in Thunder Bay. Representative / Resident HMM received a followup email regarding above comments (See attached letter written to CTB regarding multi-use paths, photos of winter multi-use paths from Finland, a triple use path in Montreal, and a 27m cross section illustrating the suggestions). His main concerns included: 1) Eliminating the need for bikes to cross Balmoral more than once per trip, preventing cyclists from making bad decisions about where to cross. There are few good places to cross Balmoral To be addressed in the updated Project and the updated design will not address this deficiency. Crossing cyclists are at risk and disrupt File the flow of motor vehicle traffic; 2) Access to businesses on the East side of Balmoral by cyclists of all ages and abilities (including children); 3) Travel between businesses on the East side of Balmoral by bike; 4) Enhanced bike route connectivity options for future East-West expansion. Resident HMM received an email - His mail concerns included: 1) Could an active transportation path exist on both sides of the street; 2) Controlled intersections - very dangerous and the project does not show any forward thinking around pedestrian or cyclist crossing; 3) Is there anough traffic throughout the day to support double left turn lanes, working against traffic calming; 4) Uncontrolled intersections - this has been handled well in other locations throughout the city so its expected we will see similar road markings and possibly even raised crossings; 5) Is there more information on intersection design coming; 6) It would be helpful to visualize what the bus stops would look like along this route - the sidewalk bulbs added recently on Junot are very nice but are challenging when a cyclist is forced to overtake a stopped bus; 7) Security/Public Safety - Balmoral is a significant arterial in Thunder Bay. In a lot of ways the preliminary solution is a much better, safer more public route for everyone who needs to travel across the city rather then using the existing secluded recreational path along the river. It could only be enhanced by innovative design supporting an active transportation trail on both sides of the road and appropriate crossing infrastructure; 8) It does not appear that there are any public information events scheduled but would be useful considering the likely cost and potential effects to storm water management, traffic and business. 1 of 17 Explained that his comments will be reviewed with the City and taken into consideration. Response to questions via email on Nov 9, 2015 6-Nov-15 HMM received an email, the main comments/concerns included: 1) Curbs on both sides of the road provides us with the height necessary for those in mobility devices, with strollers, and those with assistive devices to have an easier time boarding due to the almost parallel ramp deployed from the vehicle; 2) Providing sidewalks connected to each transit stop on both sides To be addressed in the updated Project CTB Transit Services Planning & Marketing of the road is preferred to a multi-use trail due to the improved winter maintenance schedule and clear, delineated paths of travel (or a concrete transit loading zone with paved connection Division Analyst File to trail if trail is chosen); 3) Private participation in creating paths of travel between sidewalk(s) and businesses; 4) Install a pedestrian crossover between Beverly and Central to provide consistent crossing experience; 5) Sizing of concrete apron for bus stop; 6) Provided a link to a map of current bus stop locations. 9-Nov-15 Red Sky Metis Independent Nation Community Consultant HMM received an email, the main concern as follows: 1) The increased volume of traffic on the To be addressed in the updated Project alternate routes; 2) Accessibility to the businesses in the area; 3) The amount of time it will take to complete; 4) Requested that an estimate timeline of potential road closures if the Full File Roadway Reconstruction would to take place be provided. 9-Nov-15 CTB Parks and Open Spaces Planning Supervisor HMM received an email requesting a hard or electronic copy of the preliminary drawings for review and indicated that a summary of the comments from Parks and Open Spaces will be provided upon review of the drawings. 11-Nov-15 12-Nov-15 13-Nov-15 Center for Research on Safe Driving, Lakehead University Auto Home Paints To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: It is imperative that any repairs, upgrades to roads include multi-use plans, i.e. active transportation or bike lanes, and pedestrian sidewalks. I'm To be addressed in the updated Project pleased that this is the preferred option. As a faculty member of Lakehead University who File commutes several days a week to the University from May-late October, I have had to cycle on Balmoral rd on a number of occasions to get to Central Ave. It is a dangerous road for cyclist. Faculty HMM received an email, reading as follows: Regarding the Balmoral Street plans, this is the year 2015 and it is incumbent upon government and citizens to be planning and supporting more active forms of transport. Thus is is imperative that any upgrades to roads include multiuse plans that physically separate bikes, motor vehicles and pedestrian. The city has done an To be addressed in the updated Project excellent job with this on Junot recently and I'm pleased that this is the preferred option. As a File faculty member of Lakehead University who commutes several days a week to the University, I have had to cycle on Balmoral rd on a number of occasions to get to Central Ave; it is clearly a dangerous road for cyclists. I wish you the very best with this planning. Business Owner HMM received an email requesting to be included in any further communication and study findings for the proposed construction of Balmoral St. 2 of 17 CTB responded via email Nov 13/15, providing link for public comments on preliminary design options 20-Nov-15 Various Businesses 22-Nov-15 23-Nov-15 23-Nov-15 23-Nov-15 Dave Jones from Auto Home Paints organized a group of interested business owners that would be affected by the Balmoral Street reconstruction project - meeting took place at Auto Home Paints with the interested business representatives, CTB & HMM representatives. Concerns/questions included 1) What is the proposed traffic staging plans during construction; To be addressed in the updated Project File 2) Concerned with construction activities and the loss of business due to construction delays/road closures; 3) Concerned with directing traffic to Barton/Roland during construction; 4) The businesses would like to have ample amount of notice prior to any proposed road closures and/or traffic detours that may affect their businesses. Lakehead University Physical Plant Resident HMM received an email - his main concerns included: 1) Multi-use trails should be built on both sides of Balmoral Street to improve access to roads and businesses on both sides of the street; 2) How the intersections will co-operate with multi-use trail users and cyclists; 3) Forwarded concerns to the engineering Thunder Bay drivers do not know how to use right turn ramps, and these ramps do not mix well department for review and comment on with bicycles - cyclists end up having to wait for vehicles to use the ramps before crossing even Nov 22/15 though they have the right-of-way; 4) Suggested removing right turn ramps and integrating wide radius corners (see attached intersection configuration used in Poland); 5) Widen the multi-use trail on both sides and remove the sidewalk. Resident HMM received an email - main concerns included: 1) The need for an active transportation trail to along Balmoral from Beverly St to William St on the west side; 2) To preserve the existing To be addressed in the updated Project marsh ecosystem in the ditch areas along Balmoral; 3) Sidewalks are not necessary as the File trail can be shared; 4) Budgeting for the roads dept. to pave along the curb for winter snow kill is also not necessary. Director HMM received an email, reading as follows: The preferred solution of full roadway reconstruction including implementation of storm sewer, intersection improvements and boulevard construction complete with sidewalk and active transportation trail is our preferred option. The roadway surface does need to be replaced and the addition of storm sewers and sidewalks/active transportation trails will be a welcome addition to the roadway that abuts our campus. Resident HMM received an email - his main design concerns included: 1) The cost and full extent of the components of the redesign; 2) Would there be potential to reduce lanes to 3.5m and add additional green space on the sides of the roads - spaces for storm mitigation or flowerbeds for To be addressed in the updated Project File bees/monarch butterflies; 3) Wondering if there has been any talk with Thunder Bay Hydro about adding means of producing renewable power (small solar panels) to the side of the roadway; 4) Are there plans/talk regarding future development along this area of Balmoral St. 3 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File 24-Nov-15 CTB Engineering Division 24-Nov-15 24-Nov-15 26-Nov-15 27-Nov-15 27-Nov-15 CTB Engineering Division Days Inn CTB staff will be meeting to discuss proposed design of Balmoral Street Friday Nov 27/15, would like a response to the following questions/concerns to discuss in said meeting 1) Current Level of Service at major intersections for cyclists, pedestrians, transit and automobiles 2) Target Level of Service for above modes of transportation 3) Which multi-modal Level of Service measure is HMM using to determine this 4) What is the 85th percentile Level of Responded to concerns via email Service for automobiles at major intersections 5) Details of HMM's three-step bicycle facility Mobility Coordinator correspondance Nov 24/15 (CTB) and section process as per Traffic Manual Book 18 6) Draft configuration for pedestrian and cyclist Nov 25/15 (HMM) crossings at Harbour Exrpessway, Alloy/Amber & Hewitson/Sibley intersections 7) Proposed location and alignment of multi-use trail and sidewalk 8) Provide rational/reasoning for proposing a sidewalk instead of a multi-use trail on the east side of Balmoral 9) Indicate whether there will be physical trail connections between pedestrian and cyclist facilities and transit stops. Resident In response to previous phone call: 1) Provided a link to a City of Ottawa resource used to aid in adressing right turn ramp and pedestrian crossing issues (See attached document Pedestrian Intersection Safety Countermeasure Handbook, Pg. 39-41); 2) Suggested visiting Memorial/Harbour intersection as a pedestrian and crossing every direction to get an idea of what cyclists experience. Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: I am in support of the full roadway reconstruction option. Most importantly, I believe that the active transportation trail is important along this corridor. I often commute on bicycle between downtown Port Arthur and downtown Fort William To be addressed in the updated Project and there are no reasonable and safe options between Sixth Ave. and Northern. While the File Memorial Link is essential, having an active transportation trail along this stretch of Balmoral would provide another option crossing the City. I encourage pursuance of active transportation infrastructure along this route. Resident HMM received an email - his main concerns/suggestions included: 1) Adding multi-use trails on both sides of Balmoral; 2) Adding pedestrian crosswalks ascross the yield lanes exiting/entering the Expressway - raised crosswalks that are well marked and lit to slow vehicle To be addressed in the updated Project traffic; 3) Add pedestrian controlled crosswalks across Balmoral at Alloy/Amber and File Sibley/Hewitson intersections and tighten curb radius to slow turning vehicle traffic; 4) Plant vegetation/trees along the edge of street and incorporate Low Impact Development to manage runoff; 5) Beutify area by adding park benches, garbage and recycling receptacles. To be addressed in the updated Project File Additional request for information regarding previous email inquiry (dated Nov 24-15): 1) Do you have an estimated construction cost for expanding the Balmoral and Harbour Expressway To be addressed in the updated Project Mobility Coordinator from its current configuration to the preferred double turning lane configuration; 2) Clarification File regarding request related to the 85th percentile Level of Service for automobiles at major traffic intersections along Balmoral St. General Manager A meeting took place at Days Inn with Tracy and Gord from Days Inn and CTB & HMM representatives. Concerns/questions included: 1) Concerned with access to the Days Inn To be addressed in the updated Project during construction and detour routes; 2) Concerned with construction activities and the loss of File business due to construction delays/road closures; 3) Concerned with directing traffic to Barton during construction; 4) 4 of 17 27-Nov-15 29-Nov-15 29-Nov-15 30-Nov-15 1-Dec-15 Resident HMM received a phone call from xxxxx - her comments/questions included: 1) How are double lefts determined for an intersection; 2) Concerned with the proposed pedestrian crossing area To be addressed in the updated Project at the Balmoral/Harbour intersection, the addtion of extra lanes makes it harder for pedestrians File to cross the interesection; 3) Who did the mail outs go to with regards to the proposed construction? Resident HMM received an email, reading the following: I am writing because my family and I are very interested in using the active transportation lanes on Balmoral Street. We live in between May To be addressed in the updated Project and balmoral. We would feel much safer if there were lanest on both sides of the road. As it is File now I feel very nervous crossing the very busy road to get home or to the businesses on that side of the road. Please seriously consider having the two side safe for families and bikers. Resident HMM received an email - main comments/concerns include: 1) Concerns with there only being one active transportation trail and having to cross Balmoral to engage in commerce at To be addressed in the updated Project businesses on the East side, especially when utilizing the trail system with his small children; 2) Aside from morning and afternoon rush hours, the turn lanes are rarely backed up enough to File justify double turn lanes - wider intersection for pedestrians and cyclists to cross seems to be in opposition to making active transportation safer and more accessible in the city. Resident HMM received an email - his main concerns included: 1) Construct right turn lane going south off Balmoral St. turning west onto William St. and possibly use right-turn green arrow at this intersection; 2) Design the placement of the sewers and manholes so they are not in the wheel track; 3) Investigate the timing of the traffic lights at both William St and Central Ave that would permit approaching traffic leaving a green light at Balmoral & the Harbour to get a green To be addressed in the updated Project light at these intersections; 4) Possibility of making the right turn south off of Balmoral to west File onto the Harbour Expressway a true merge lane - find it challenging to enter the higher speed traffic on the Harbour Expressway; 5) Would it be possible to bury the hydro and other utility wires that run along Balmoral, they are so unslightly. Perhaps there is funding for some form of infrastructure resiliency action such as burying hydro lines to protect then from ice storm damage. Resident HMM received an email, which reads as follows: Thank you for inviting public input on the Balmoral St Redesign. I am a young home owner in the city and want to see our roads To be addressed in the updated Project become increasingly safe and usable vehicles, bikes and pedestrians. I support Alternative #4 File Full Roadway Reconstruction and believe a multi-use trail down the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. 5 of 17 1-Dec-15 CTB Parks and Open Spaces Planning 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 Faculty of Education, Lakehead University Supervisor HMM received an email outlining the comments from the CTB Parks & Open Spaces Section (See attached document). Main concerns/suggestings included: 1) Discrepancies & agreeances with existing conditions; 2) Alternative planning solution recommendations; 3) Preferred planning alternative design regarding traditional grey infrastructure; 4) Ambiguities with regards to landscaped boulevards; 5) Recommendations to include all adjecent city owned lands into study area; 6) Recommendations & suggestions on tree and vegtation planting; 7) Incorporating green infrastructure; 8) General design elements and considerations, including multi-use trail recommendations, commuter cyclists, accessibility considerations and maintenance considerations. To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email - her main concerns included: 1) Putting a multi-use trail on each side of Balmoral St. to make the current system more functional; 2) Based on the current drawing for the Harbour Expressway I am very concerned for the safety of cyclists and pedestrians. If To be addressed in the updated Project the trail is only on one side of the street people will try crossing at unsafe areas or will ride with File or against traffic due to the inconvenience of the trail being only accessible on one side. Please when you think of active transportation think of convenience just like you do for motorists. Resident HMM received an email, reading the following: I support Alternative #4 - Full Roadway Reconstruction with a multi-use trail down the west side, but there should be raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. I am troubled by the lack of a safe pedestrian crossing at Balmoral and Sibley/Hewitson though and would like to see a controlled intersection there to allow students and workers in the area easier access to shopping and restaurants in the intercity area. To be addressed in the updated Project File Adjunct Professor HMM received an email, reading the following: I support Alternative #4 - Full Roadway Reconstruction and believe a multi-use trail down the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, the main concerns included: 1) Comparing the proposed design to a study titled 'Narrower Lanes, Safer Streets,' the lanes proposed by the design are far too wide and rather unsafe. The study recommends the lanes should be reduced to 3.3m for both inner and outer lanes and turn lanes should be reduced to 2.8m. This reduced width would force drivers to travel at slower speeds closer to the posted speed limit; 2) There is also no bike lanes, but rather an active transport trail in the current design. With limited drive way access to balmoral it would make much more sense to build a segregated cycle route on the western side To be addressed in the updated Project of the road. By reducing the lane widths to 3.3m for all 4 lanes a cycle route could be built File along the western side for little to no additional cost; 3) The intersection plans do not include any planned interaction other than how cars interact. Pedestrian crossings, and cyclists integration needs to be designed into how intersections operate; 4) I would also like to see a pedestrian crossings midway between most of the intersections as there is nearly a half KM between most intersections and crossing at any other location is illegal. These long gaps between intersections must be bridged with cross walks so people can safely walk in the area. 6 of 17 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 Fresh Air Resident HMM received an email, his main concerns included: 1) I am in favour of the Full Roadway Reconstruction option because, although it will undoubtedly be the most expensive option (at least in the short-run), it is the only one that truly addresses the need for this corridor to be a safe one for non-auto-mobile users; 2) I do not agree with building additional lanes at the Harbour Expressway intersection. Providing more space at the intersections induces demand for car-centric transportation. Additionally, additional lanes increases the hazard for pedestrians (including those in wheelchairs) and cyclists as they have a greater span of intersection to To be addressed in the updated Project cross; 3) I would like to see the active transportation route be constructed on both sides of File Balmoral. I believe that it is important to have the active transportation be as accessible as possible and given that there are long stretches of Balmoral without intersections and/or crosswalks, I believe it is a necessary convenience and safety measure to have the AT routes on both sides; 4) I believe that beautification through landscaping and greenery, as well as attractive street-lighting, is vital. Trees and shrubs, in addition to being attractive, can provide pedestrians with a sense of protection (physical barrier) from vehicular traffic. Treed boulevards to separate auto-mobiles and active transportation should be a component of the redesign. Resident HMM received an email, his main concerns included: 1) I urge you to remove dual left turn lanes in all quadrants from the design for the Harbour Expressway and Balmoral intersection and maintain a single left turn lane in all quadrants; 2) Provide active transportation facilities on both sides of Balmoral; 3) Carefully consider the needs of all users in the design of the intersections. Community Engagement Mgr To be addressed in the updated Project File HMM received an email, their main concerns included: 1) The biggest need has been a north /south lane that allows residents to travel between the two cores or the residential areas to the institutional centres. Balmoral St lends itself to a multi-use trail and sidewalk. We applaud your To be addressed in the updated Project task of looking at this; 2) Would it not be safer, cheaper and more useful to have a multi-use File trail on both sides; 3) From Sibley Dr, if there was a merge ramp heading east bound, it would allow vehicle traffic to head East,or North to access Balmoral without having to turn left at Sibley and Hewitson, reducing stress at this intersection; 4) If the east side of Balmoral’s sidewalk or multi use trail went as far as Norah Crescent, safety would be enhanced. Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: I believe that it is incredibly important to start restructuring our city to make it more active transport friendly, reducing our reliance on fossil fuels in order to navigate the city. I support Alternative #4 - Full Roadway Reconstruction and believe a multi-use trail down the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: I favour the full reconstruction, especially To be addressed in the updated Project sidewalks and active transportation corridors. Would also like to see storm water catchment and treatment areas using wetlands, seating areas along the active transportation corridors and File energy efficient and wild life friendlier down lighting. Please add me to the email list. 7 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 1-Dec-15 School of Outdoor Recreation, Parks & Tourism, Lakehead University Eye Care Center Faculty HMM received an email, his concerns included: 1) The project should extend further south to Arthur St. as that part of the street also needs attention; 2) I do not see a need to double left turn lanes at the Harbour Expressway; 3) I like the idea of the partial medians at Alloy and To be addressed in the updated Project Hewiston. It will eliminate or reduce the left turns onto Balmoral that are at times dangerous. File Trucks leaving the Husky station often bully their way onto Balmoral making left turns. However, if they cannot make that left turn, they will be forced to make left turns onto Alloy, Tungsten and Central to get to Balmoral. Tungsten St, in particular is not suitable for increased truck traffic as it is narrow and in poor repair. Optometrist HMM received an email, her comments/concerns included: 1) I support the current preliminary preferred solution of a full roadway reconstruction. In particular I welcome the planned sidewalks and active transportation paths for improved safety and convenience for pedestrians, To be addressed in the updated Project cyclists and motorists; 2) Accessing the nearby bus stops from the west side of Balmoral currently requires walking to the Harbour intersection or crossing the street which is difficult File and not very safe; 3) This is an opportunity to make Balmoral Street more walkable, more accessible for cyclists, to apply "low-impact development" or LID principles to storm water management and to enhance the area’s aesthetics. Resident HMM received an email, his comments/concerns included: 1) There are numerous other intersections along this corridor of which nothing is mentioned. For example, what is proposed at Jasper Drive, Lithium Drive, Central Avenue and William Street; 2) There is mention made of no unusual plant species but no mention of the existing wildlife corridor and how, or, if wildlife/vehicular collisions will be mitigated or even addressed; 3) Is it anticipated that the proposed construction can in fact be constructed within the existing r-o-w or is property acquisition anticipated; 4) There is no mention of existing or future traffic volumes but design proposals to accommodate heavy(?) traffic volumes (left turns). There is no mention of collision To be addressed in the updated Project statistics to support planning (design) proposals. Are there plans to mitigate collision File experience; 5) Design proposals appear to be more restrictive to existing traffic patterns, forcing traffic along existing unsuitable municipal streets. There is no mention of the impact on these other municipal roads or improvements required to support increased traffic and heavy loads; 6) The proximity of intersections to the Harbour Expressway suggests that other alternatives should be considered or at least evaluated, such as closure, right in right out, or relocating intersections further downstream; 7) Is there a potential for a left turn lane(s) turning into a two-way left tun lane to accommodate turning manouvres; 8) Please keep me informed and add me to the mailing list. 8 of 17 1-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 Resident HMM received an email with additional questions as listed: 1) Has the double turning lanes on Golf Links improved safety or made it worse; 2) Does making roads wider or providing additional lanes increase safety; 3) How long is Thunder Bay's rush hour; 4) How will uncontrolled intersections be handled along Balmoral given the new infrastructure; 5) How will off-ramp crossings be handled for the Harbour Expressway with the added multi-use trail and sidewalk; 6) What is the estimated increase to transit load if the additional pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure is put in place; 7) How will storm water be improved / managed with the addition of more impermeable surfaces (sidewalk, multiuse trail, additional turning lanes); 8) The Harbour Expressway intersection needs serious design consideration – the pedestrian point of view is Ramp, Median, Lane, Lane, Turning Lane, Turning Lane, Middle Median, Lane, Lane, Median, Ramp, Relief as you reach the safety of a multi-use trail again. CTB responded via email on Dec 3, 2015 Resident HMM received an email, which reads as follows: I support Alternative #4 - Full Roadway Reconstruction and believe a multi-use trail down the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. Thank you for considering my input as somebody that would like to bicycle year round on Balmoral. To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, her comments/concerns included: 1) Pedestrian lighting - If you are having street light poles facing traffic, I see no reason why the wiring could not be done at the same time to accommodate lighting on the pedestrian/cycling side, making it safer for all trail/sidewalk users. 2) If using LED lighting, after the initial set up costs, I would suspect operating costs would be insignificant. To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: I support Alternative #4 - Full Roadway Reconstruction and believe a multi-use trail down the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, his comments included: 1) I am very pleased to see that an active transportation route has been incorporated into the design. I think it is imperative that providing actual lane(s) for cyclist in the design as the standard for any major transportation routes in the To be addressed in the updated Project city; 2) Further, in the warmer weather I frequently commute to work via bicycle traveling on the path though the university/college/Chapples. I will definitely use the proposed active File transportation route to commute to work; 3) I appreciate the City's efforts to create painted bike lanes on a number of streets in the past years. I applaud your consideration in creating actual lane(s) in this design. 9 of 17 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 Thunder Bay District Health Unit Director of Health Promotion HMM received a letter via email (See attached), indicating that TBDHU supports and commends the Preferred Planning Alternative 4: Full Roadway Reconstruction but has the following comments/concerns: 1) Consider sidewalks on both sides of Balmoral Street, with additional dedicated cycling facilities. The municipality is obliged to comply with the standards outlined in the AODA for a redevelopment that will reach substantial completion after Jan 1, 2016. Using a multiuse trail on the west side of Balmoral does not meet the needs of the To be addressed in the updated Project community, as there is a need for functional travel at all time, efficient access to bus stops, and File reliability of a winter maintenance schedule; 2) Reconsider the need for double left-turning lanes at the intersection of Balmoral Street and the Harbour Expressway; 3) Consider a pedestrian crossover between Beverly Street and Central Avenue; 4) Consider extending the sidewalk/multiuse trail on Balmoral Street to connect with the sidewalk on William Street, or negotiate a cost-share alternative with TBDHU to improve connectivity and enable pedestrian to access the west side (entrance) of TBDHU. A meeting took place between the CTB and the Accessibility Advisory Committee on December 1, 2015. The following recommendations were presented: 1) At bus stop locations, the importance of curbs for bus mobility devices and hard surface pads (preferably concrete) are a requirement for safe access to buses; 2) Consideration should be given to direct connection from trails or sidewalks to bus stops and if possible to business along the Balmoral corridor 3) Sidewalks or multiuse trail should be installed level with the surrounding ground. Small lips can cause mobility devices to get stuck or tip; 4) Some separation should be provided between sidewalk or multiuse trails and curbs or steep slopes. Close proximity to curbs or steep slopes near walking trails can be a hazard for those using mobility devices Original Minutes provided by M. Vogrig causing users to topple or get stuck. Extra attention needs to paid near traffic when a chair can at CTB on Dec 2/15; Scott Garner sent tip over into traffic; 5) Sidewalk Ramps should be installed with a tactile surface similar to the his version with additional comments new ramps installed at May street. This is a requirement of the new AODA guidelines. In Dec 4/15 addition, similar treatment should be given to asphalt ramps so the visually impaired can tell whether or not they are entering a street or are on an asphalt trail. Concrete sidewalks are preferred as they are more visible and easier to differentiate from asphalt roads; 6) Ramp locations should be clearly defined, in particular their edges as mobility devices can tip if they go over the curb section. Wider is better; 7) Ramps should be placed parallel to the lane of travel/crossing. Visually impaired persons may cross diagonally if ramp sections are created around an entire radius; 8) At intersection crossings, audible pedestrian signal are a must; 9) Tactile surface indicators should also be placed squarely to the lane of travel to avoid diagonal crossing at an intersection by persons with visual impairment. Accessibility Advisory Committee Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: I support Alternative #4 - Full Roadway Reconstruction and believe a multi-use trail down the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. But to be SAFER, the multi-use trail should be physically separated from the roadway. That would make drivers and cyclists/roller bladers/wheelchair users much more comfortable. 10 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 Walkability Committee Resident HMM received an email, her comments read as follows: The harbour expressway and balmoral form part of my route to work each morning. Each morning I curse the drivers heading west on the harbour that turn south into balmoral into the wrong lane in order to turn into Tim Hortons. There is no proper turning or lane changing and traffic routinely backs up on the ramp. It is my submission that this needs to be alleviated with the redesign. I suggest eliminating that entrance altogether as it is too close to the intersection in the first place and is quite hazardous. Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: Quick note to let you know that after reading the details regarding this project I support Alternative number 4 which includes a well designed active transportation trail. Chair HMM recieved a letter via email (see attached), the comments/concerns included: 1) Preferred exterior walkway option is a multiuse trail on both sides, also having a sidewalk on the east side. It is imperative that the City ensures that any multiuse trail, where it is serving the purpose of a sidewalk along this arterial, is maintained as a sidewalk throughout the winter; 2) Improve the connectivity by ensuring transit stops are in close proximity and physically connected to trail/sidewalks, and provide walkways into existing businesses; 3) In regards to pedestrian lighting, pedestrian-scale lighting should be installed in addition to proposed street lights if spillover from street lights is not enough to illuminate pedestrian paths and install lighting at all transit stops; 4) Consider the placement of a pedestrian crossover between Beverly and Central (1.2km stretch). During the reconstruction of Balmoral Street, include any electrical provisions to be able to easily install a crossover at a future date. After the reconstruction is complete, conduct a study to determine the best location for pedestrian crossover in terms of safety and meeting the needs of the community; 5) Consider longer pedestrian crossing To be addressed in the updated Project signals at intersections, countdown pedestrian crossing signals, audible pedestrian crossing File signals, automatic pedestrian signals at intersections, pedestrian crossing islands, rest areas throughout the length of the corridor (The City should consult with the Accessibility Advisory Committee to determine appropriate rest areas), ramped curbs on sidewalks at intersections to improve accessibility for pedestrians using mobility devices; 6) Green infrastructure/vegetation considerations - the use of Low Impact Development Stormwater Management elements, include diverse vegetation and trees, not only on boulevards but also consider the use of vegetation on medians; 7) Harbour Expressway intersection considerations - reconsider the need for double-turning lanes at this intersection, and if the intersection is increased to six lanes, consider pedestrian refuge medians in the intersection and safer merging lanes (smaller curb radii); 8) Additional safety concerns include: establish a consistent speed limit throughout the corridor (50km/h), include well-marked pedestrian/cyclist crossing facilities where multiuse trail(s) cross intersections, install raised and marked crosswalks for pedestrians across merge lanes at the intersection of Balmoral Street and Harbour Expressway, reconstruct the intersections of Sibley/Hewitson & Balmoral and Alloy & Balmoral with smaller curb radii. 11 of 17 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: Option 4 - I don't know about the strategy to change the actual road way but I do know that sidewalks or oversized trails providing access to Ontarioworks, and other social offices, as well as the hospital and L.U. and the Jasper Court Area are really needed. Now and then a poor fellow in a wheel chair tries to navigate Balmoral and its terrifying. I live in downtown FW. and would like the opportunity to walk to work but frankly its hazardous. Please move ahead to supply a means for pedestrian traffic, not just bikes, to have safe access. I have sent alderman this request over the years and am very happy to see that this is being considered. Resident HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) I am glad that your group is considering the 4th alternative or the preferred planning alternative design; 2) Lighting on the trail - a trail with lighting will help keep cyclists and walkers off the roadways but allow them to see the trail in front of them; 3) Rest areas along the way can be a great addition especially for those students walking back from the Superstore to LU with bags of groceries; 4) Connections to the local businesses so bikers and pedestrians can access them; 5) Ensuring winter plowing allows the season to be extended and recreation and commuting to continue year round; 6) I support the ideas of both pedestrian crossovers and green space and vegetation additions. 12 of 17 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 CTB, Parks and Open Space Planning SUCCI Urban Forest Program Specialist President A meeting amongst EarthCare's Community Greening Working Group was held on Nov 24/15 (See attached document), comments/concerns included: 1) The Project File does not identify Green Infrastructure (GI) as an opportunity in the Project File. The main area of concern for the Working Group was consistently related to the absence of GI in the proposed road reconstruction. We would like to see GI incorporated into the road reconstruction plans from the outset; 2) The Working Group questioned where the new storm sewer outlet would be located and how the water would be treated. We recommend that the Stormwater Master Plan be referenced to determine how to effectively incorporate GI into the design as the primary infrastructure being used for localized stormwater management; 3) We would like GI to be identified clearly as an opportunity on the Balmoral Street Project File as there are numerous benefits; 4) We would like the Project File to incorporate the Urban Forest Management Plan, the Storm Water Master Plan draft, the EarthCare Sustainability Plan, the Accessibility Plan, the Urban Design Guidelines, alongside the Active Transportation Plan and the Clean, Green & Beautiful policy, during the planning of this project; 5) We recommend that a greater level of study be undertaken that will not overlook the existence and benefits of the wetland habitat and ecosystem that is situated along the adjacent ditches and low lying areas, which have been identified for drainage and burial; 6) We recommend that trees be planted on both sides of the corridor on the far side of the recreation trail and sidewalk, rather than being planted as a buffer directly beside the street. Some trees or shrubs may be planted in a GI boulevard that is designed to deal with the salt conditions on this boulevard; 7) We recommend that the Accessibility Plan and the Active Transportation Plan be referred to for guidance on BMP designs that will help to support accessibility and safety for pedestrians and cyclists of all ages and abilities at this intersection. We also recommend that GI in the form of LID be installed in and around the Harbour Expressway intersection, to manage storm water runoff as close to the source as possible, rather than sending it into the storm sewer; 8) We recommend that onstreet cycling facilities be installed to meet the needs of commuter cyclists, who do not belong on recreational trails. This could take the form of elevated cycle tracks, separated bike lanes, or as a last resort painted bike lanes; 9) We would like to see ‘landscaped boulevards’ be replaced with “Green Infrastructure,” where it will be possible to incorporate LID, permeable soils, and appropriate species of trees, shrubs, perennials, and other impermeable surfaces that will be able to withstand the salt conditions along this corridor; 10) We would like to recommend the following cross-section design, from left to right, facing north: Swale -> Trees > AT Trail -> Lighting & Salt tolerant GI -> Cycle Track -> Road -> Cycle Track -> Salt tolerant GI -> Sidewalk -> Tree planting -> Swale. HMM received an email, reading as follows: I have previously endorsed the Balmoral Street Neighborhood presentation, but felt it didn't go far enough to safely connect students and staff at Confederation College to Balmoral street. Currently there are no sidewalks on Sibley Drive, or William Street for people to safely access the businesses located on Balmoral street in that area from the college. It would be great if the multi use pathway could safely connect the campus to the proposed new trail along Balmoral street. 13 of 17 Resident HMM received an email, her main comments/concerns included: 1) Multi use path on both sides, at best on the west side linking up with the multiuse trail near cameron street and Balmoral leading into Chapels, with sidewalk on East side; 2) Safe pedestrian crosswalks at major intersections as well as on longer stretches with no stoppages for cars; 3) Decrease in the turning radius' at intersections to encourage drivers to slow down and give pedestrians the rite of way; 4) More greening, planting trees, local species and low impact development to manage storm water; 5) Include garbage cans and park benches for people to rest which will allow people to walk farther distances or wait while their 3 year old is having a meltdown. 2-Dec-15 Resident HMM received an email, her comments/concerns included: 1) Active transportation on both sides of the road are a necessity, even if it involves cycle and pedestrian traffic moving together; 2) It is very difficult for cyclists to operate like vehicles (as they are required to by To be addressed in the updated Project law) if they need to cross a road but are salmoning up that road against traffic. For example, File with the active transport route on the west side of balmoral, if I am travelling north on my bike and have to cross traffic to get to a side street like hewitson, how do I safely navigate the traffic flow when I am biking against the nearest lane of cars? 2-Dec-15 Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: While my preference for Balmoral would be a To be addressed in the updated Project raised bike lane on each side of Balmoral, of the options presented #4 with a 3 m wide multiuse File trail is strongly preferable. Resident CTB received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) I agree with some version of "Option 4", which would include "Active Transportation" options; 2) I don't know that there is a necessity for a 'path" on both sides, but definitely a need on the west side. Cannot a common, wider path serve pedestrians and cyclists; 3) Would be nice to be able to take sidewalk to busstop in winter; 4) The businesses which back onto Balmoral between William St. and Sibley/Hewitson all face onto a side street, so don't need sidewalk access on both sides, perhaps; 5) Problem is, unless new lights are added, the busy street prevents people from crossing to access the rec trail if they're walking on side that doesn't have the rec-trail/sidewalk; 6) The area is also lacking in sidewalks for students of College to get to Intercity area, as I recall. I think students deserve better!! They are our future, and we should make them safe and welcome; 7) A trail, AWAY FROM ROADWAY is the right option. A white line does not give me the feeling of safety; 8) Im also curious as to what is meant by "restriction of east/west movements" on the drawings of the Alloy/Amber and other intersection; 9) I do not see a new traffic light. Are any new lights proposed; 10) Is there a public meeting being held? 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 14 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File CTB responded via email on Dec 2, 2015 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 Resident HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) Both pedestrians and cyclists need to be accommodated on both sides of the road. Separating pedestrians and cyclists be providing infrastructure for both, either in the form of bike lanes in addition to sidewalks, or multiuse trails with signage indicating proper usage to reduce the likelihood of collisions (i.e. walking traffic stay right, cyclists pass on left, etc.) be incorporated into the design; 2) Multiuse trails should be maintained year round as they will serve as linkages between transit and business areas; 3) Lighting should be positioned to service both the road and the implemented To be addressed in the updated Project multiuse trails and sidewalks; 4) Consider the use of Low Impact Development Storm Water File Management elements and include diverse vegetation (preferably native species) and trees throughout the development; 5) The project should include basic amenities to service the anticipated increase in pedestrian usage of this route, including, but not limited to benches, sheltered rest/transit stops and waste/recycling receptacles for litter prevention. Site preparation may be necessary for these installations and should be considered at the time of reconstruction. Resident HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) Grade separated bike lanes on both sides of Balmoral to make cycling easier; 2) Sidewalks on both sides with pedestrian crosswalks at intersections to encourage, and make is safer for, people to walk; 3) Changing To be addressed in the updated Project the wide turn radius at intersections, preventing high speed turns by vehicles; 4) More File trees/plantings and Low Impact Development to manage storm water; 5) Park benches and garbage/recycling recepticles to create a people friendly space; 6) Dedicated transit corridor for future Bus Rapid Transit use. Resident HMM received an email, her main comments/concerns included: 1) I am pleased to see that there will be sidewalks and multiuse trails in the new design; 2) At the Harbour Expressway intersection, the plan to build double turn lanes is not safe for pedestrians, cyclists or vehicles; 3) There needs to be a multiuse trail on both sides to accomodate both pedestrians and cyclists, to allow them to travel northbound safely and access amenities and streets on the east side not near a controlled crossing (stoplight); 4) It is critical that there be a sidewalk linking businesses close to intersections to the intersections - demonstrated by the trail worn by pedestrians through the ditch linking Montanas to the Harbour, and from the Harbour to the To be addressed in the updated Project Royal Bank builidng, from the Harbour onto the Keg/Bank of Nova Scotia area; 5) File Intersections at Alloy, Central, Lithium, Jasper, Hewitson, William, Forest, etc. need to be designed with the pedestrian and cyclist in mind. There needs to be a right angle curb so that there is the narrowest distance for pedestrians and cyclists to cross the intersection (eg. Arundel and West Lyon Blvd south side of Blvd. Lake); 6) Transit stops need to be incorporated into the design, and there needs to be a study on key destinations in the area around Alloy drive to ensure that people who take transit from the north or south can safely access those destinations on the opposite side of Balmoral; 7) Please add me to your mailing list. Resident HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) Please, please, please incorporate some sort of separated bike/walking path into your plans. The need for more active, safe active transportation routes are IMPERITIVE; 2) It would be nice if the paths connected to the LU/College recreation paths somehow, but if that can not be done at least have a path that bikers/hikers can travel down Balmoral safely; 3) Lights would be really, really nice and some trees (similar to Golf Links). 15 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) I love the idea of including active transportation routes to the construction plans; 2) Will there be lights on both sides of Balmoral To be addressed in the updated Project that will allow pedestrians/bikes to cross safely at Alloy Drive and Hewitson/Sibley Drive; 3) File Will there be adequate lighting on the bike path? Resident HMM received a phone call from Morley - comments/concerns included: 1) Possible implementation of roundabouts at the Harbour-Balmoral intersection; 2) Install count down traffic lights to improve driver awareness (used in Europe). To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: I wanted to let it be known that as a resident of Thunder Bay who is looking to become a more active cyclist, that I support alternative # 4, the full roadway reconstruction, as I believe that a multi-use trail on the west side is the next best thing to raised bike lanes on each side of the roadway. To be addressed in the updated Project File Resident HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) Trees should be installed to line the entire route, two-wide if possible, and on both sides of the street; 2) Light-Industrial Development should line the area between the street and sidewalk and between the street and active transportation route; 3) The existing sections of cat-tails (north of Harbour Expwy on the east side) should be left intact and expanded as part of the LID; 4) It is very important to include the sidewalk and active transportation pathway, as is proposed; 5) I don't see a need To be addressed in the updated Project to expand to double turning lanes, unless this has been proven by a traffic study. Resources File should be spent on integrating pedestrian access and native vegetation; 6) Adequate crosswalks need to be installed along Balmoral St. in the major intersections, and potentially a pedestrian crosswalk) with a short stop signal for traffic) for pedestrians crossing Balmoral St. (especially College and University pedestrian traffic) near the Alloy Drive intersection; 7) I am very supportive of reconstructing this route. 3-Dec-15 Resident HMM received an email, reading as follows: Regarding the improvements to Balmoral Street from the floodway to Beverly Street, I hope that the city will be incorporating active To be addressed in the updated Project transportation planning, especially in bicycle infrastructure along the route. Balmoral Sterrt is a File critical north/south link for bicycling in the city connecting major businesses like the College, University and TBRHSC. Please include my comments in your assessment. 4-Dec-15 CTB Employee / Resident 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 2-Dec-15 HMM/CTB received an email, reading as follows: One of the suggestions I am going to make is that we install a traffic circle at one of the intersections. Please give that some thought. 16 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File 4-Dec-15 4-Dec-15 16-Dec-15 17-Dec-15 27-Jan-16 Resident EarthCare Water Working Group Chair HMM received an email, comments/concerns included: 1) Please provide provision for both walking and cycling, separated from auto traffic, on both sides of the road. A bike/walking trail on one side of the road only is not practical; 2) Please pay careful attention to intersections. These are just as important as the trails themselves and highly dangerous, with or without lights; 3) Trails must be on both sides of a road, with special attention paid to intersections. If not a very dangerous situation is being constructed due to stray cyclists and pedestrians crossing the roads at random points because the intersections, in reality, are not safe or it is too far between intersections to be practical for pedestrians, especially elderly pedestrians; 4) As work continues to develop trails, please pay attention not only to the trails, but to access points to and from the trail, especially at major businesses and institutions and also at intersections/street crossings, which are extremely dangerous. To be addressed in the updated Project File HMM received a letter via email (see attached), comments/concerns included: 1) We request that stormwater management be identified as a concern that needs to be adressed for this Project; 2) Please develop a comprehensive stormwater management plan that will adress water quality impacts and identify areas for improvement; 3) Please identify and evaluate To be addressed in the updated Project areas where green infrastructure can be incorporated within the Balmoral Street road corridor; File 4) Please develop an erosion and sediment control plan to control the potential for increased erosion and sediment during construction; 5) Generally, we support the Preferred Planning Alternative Design, however it appears that stormwater management and water protection has been overlooked and needs to be incorporated into the Project. EarthCare Advisory Committee HMM received a letter via email (see attached) requesting that the design consider the following: 1) Stormwater management that includes Low Impact Development (LID) and green infrastructure to increase infiltration, enhance water quality, and decrease risks associated with To be addressed in the updated Project Chair & Sustainability severe weather; 2) Green infrastructure, tree, and vegetation for beautification and other coFile Coordinator benefits; 3) Adequate cycling and pedestrian infrastructure to encourage sustainable modes of transportation that are safe including adequate pedestrian lighting on both sides of street, rest areas, and garbage recepticles. CTB Engineering Division HMM received a letter via email (see attached document), comments/concerns included: 1) General design recommendations for signalized intersections; 2) Harbour Expressway and Balmoral Street intersection design recommendations; 3) Balmoral Street and Central Avenue To be addressed in the updated Project intersection design recommendations; 4) Balmoral Street and Central Avenue intersection Mobility Coordinator design recommendations; 5) Balmoral Street and Jasper Drive intersection design File recommendations; 6) The inclusion of pedestrian crossovers; 7) Incorporating a multi-use trail on both sides of the roadway; 8) Trail lighting; 9) Crossride implementation for unsignalized intersections; 10) General design considerations. Husky Travel Center General Manager HMM spoke with GM of the Husky via phone, comments included: 1) Ensuring the detour routes would not have weight restrictions for truck traffic; 2) Maintaining access to both entrances of the business on Alloy Drive; 3) Wanted to know the approximate timeframe that the construction would impact the business area. Notes: Acronyms used throughout the table are as follows; HMM - Hatch Mott MacDonald CTB - City of Thunder Bay 17 of 17 To be addressed in the updated Project File APPENDIX C: Preliminary Design Drawings and Concepts Existing Active Transportation Route PRO Proposed Active Transportation Route JECT LIMI T BEVERLY ST ± SP JA Existing Sidewalk - ATT to Tie Into ER DR LITHIUM DR Proposed Active Transportation Route CENTRAL AVE Proposed Active Transportation Route INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (PARTIAL MEDIAN) ALLOY DR AM BER DR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (IMPLEMENTATION OF DOUBLE LEFT-TURNS) SSW AY HARBOUR EXPRE HEWITSON SIBLEY DR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS (PARTIAL MEDIAN) Proposed Active Transportation Route Proposed Active Transportation Route Existing Active Transportation Route Existing Active Transportation Route WILLIAM ST Nee b in g Flo /McIn odw ty ay re PROJECT LIMIT Imagery Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstop, and the GIS User Community OVERALL STUDY PLAN City of Thunder Bay Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction from the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway to Beverly Street PRO JECT LIMI T BEVERLY ST ± SP JA ER DR Bioretention / Biofiltration Swale and Salt / Climate Tolerant Vegetation LITHIUM DR CENTRAL AVE Bioretention / Biofiltration Swale and Salt / Climate Tolerant Vegetation ALLOY DR E B M A R D R GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN MEDIANS WITH SALT TOLERANT VEGETATION SSW AY HARBOUR EXPRE HEWITSON SIBLEY DR Bioretention / Biofiltration Swale and Salt / Climate Tolerant Vegetation WILLIAM ST BEAUTIFICATION & LANDSCAPING CONCEPTUAL PLAN FLOODWAY TO WILLIAM ST - EXISTING DITCHES TO REMAIN Nee b in g Flo /McIn odw ty ay re PROJECT LIMIT Imagery Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstop, and the GIS User Community City of Thunder Bay Class Environmental Assessment Balmoral Street Reconstruction from the Neebing/McIntyre Floodway to Beverly Street