Water Technology:
Innovation Workshop
Foreword
Globally, the water sector faces many challenges
in delivering safe, sustainable water for the needs
of mankind whilst minimising its impact on the
environment. These challenges include scarcity,
growing demand, increasing energy costs and the
impact on water use on the environment.
Arup is active in the water sector worldwide and
recognises the need to provide innovate solutions
to fast growing and developing countries through
to industrialised countries with different
requirements. In order for Arup to meet its
aspiration to ‘To Build a Better World’, we
actively seek new and innovative ways of
delivering engineering solutions.
We recognise Israel as one of the leading
countries innovating in the water sector and
therefore initiated this Innovative Water
Workshop to help build UK – Israeli partnerships
to deliver better value in the water sector globally.
Mark Fletcher
Global Water Leader, Arup
The British Government is convinced that the
creativity of Israeli innovation, partnered with the
strength and reach of the UK's companies, can be
a world-beating combination. Together we can
offer solutions to some of the world's most
important problems - new therapies for diseases,
new systems for harnessing energy, new ideas for
exploiting the internet, and new ways to address
the world's rising demand for safe, clean water.
This is why we have invested in the UK Israel
Tech Hub, an innovative new team based at the
British Embassy in Israel tasked with building
partnerships in between the two countries.Water
technology is one of our priority sectors, and the
economic logic of a UK/Israel partnership in
water is compelling. Israeli water tech can go
global by partnering with leading British
companies, like Arup, who have expertise in
delivering major infrastructure projects
worldwide. And those British companies can
gain a global competitive advantage from
partnering with Israeli water companies who have
world-beating expertise in overcoming water
scarcity and making every last drop count.
I am grateful to Arup for hosting this workshop
and for their visionary approach to innovation in
the global water industry. I am absolutely
convinced that their model of combining in-house
capabilities and expertise with the best solutions
coming out of Israel is a powerful one that will
yield exciting results, and one from which other
British companies can learn.
Matthew Gould
HM Ambassador
Overview
On the 4 March 2013, Arup hosted a delegation of 14 Israeli water technology
companies and a number of their UK counterparts at an innovation workshop, to share
their expertise and market knowledge and to identify opportunities to collaborate
globally. The event was organised in partnership with the UK Israel Tech Hub, whose
mission is to strengthen technology partnerships between the two countries. The
representatives of the water industry in the UK and Israel shared with the group the
structure of the industry, the challenges they face and the innovations that help address
both global and local needs.
Although the water technology sectors of the UK and Israel share many similarities,
it was obvious that there are a number of key differences which are driven by factors
such as local governance and regulations, water availability/water scarcity, and their
impact on the ‘value’ of water.
As well as providing an opportunity to get to know each other through a series of
interactive sessions, the output of the workshop identified specific collaboration
opportunities, some of which are outlined in this report.
Mark Fletcher,
Global Water Leader, Arup
4 March 2013
3
About the sponsors
About Arup
Arup is an independent firm of designers, planners, engineers and technical specialists
offering a diverse range of professional services to clients around the world. The firm
provides expertise in all aspects of water engineering, management and technology,
covering the entire water cycle in temperate, arid and tropical environments. In 2011
Arup was named by the Infrastructure Journal as the Global Technical Adviser of the
Year, acknowledging our position as the pre-eminent technical advisor in the
infrastructure market. Arup has a great history of research, foresight and innovation,
working with clients to explore drivers of change, to generate innovative ideas about
business futures, and to evaluate new technology.
About UK Israel Tech Hub
The UK Israel Tech Hub at the British Embassy Israel helps drive economic growth in
both countries by helping British companies partner with the best of Israeli innovation.
The goal is to create partnerships in which British companies help Israeli innovation
go global, and Israeli innovation gives British companies a global competitive edge.
The Hub was launched in October 2011 as an initiative of Ambassador Matthew
Gould, and focuses its activities within sectors identified as having unique synergies
between the UK and Israel, including Digital, Biomed, Cleantech, Arabic Internet,
Government IT and Finance.
About British Embassy Israel
The British Embassy Israel develops and maintains relations between the United
Kingdom and Israel, and supports Britain’s security, prosperity and well-being, and
regional peace, through partnership with Israel.
.
4
Agenda
The agenda was developed in collaboration with UK Israel Tech Hub based at the UK
Embassy in Israel.
The purpose of the workshop was to identify opportunities for companies to
collaborate in the water technology sector. These opportunities were discussed in a
series of facilitated workshop sessions which helped to highlight a number of areas of
interest and future collaboration between the water sectors of the two countries.
08.30
Arrivals, refreshments
09.30
Welcome and introduction
Mark Fletcher, Arup
Yoni Dolgin, UK Israel Hub
09.40
Water innovation: Necessities, realities and priorities
David Owen, Envisager Ltd
Global Water Investment
Jonathan Yates, Arup
Water foresight – key drivers for the water sector
Workshop session
10.45
Coffee break
11.15
Current Water Challenges
Short thought-provoking inputs from UK and Israel water tech companies
12.15
Lunch
13.15
‘Speed Dating’ on Water Issues
Open discussions in small groups
14.30
Tea break
15.00
Opportunities for collaboration: Local to Global
Workshop session
16.00
Plenary discussion & feedback
Final remarks
17.00
Followed by
Drinks and canapés
5
Workshop delegates
UK and Israeli companies were selected and invited to the workshop based at
Arup’s London office.
Name
Company
Contact details
James Kitson
Yorkshire Water
James.Kitson@yorkshirewater.co.uk
Prof Roy Kalawsky
Loughborough University
r.s.kalawsky@lboro.ac.uk
David Lloyd Owen
Envisager
david@envisager.co.uk
Phil Henry
Polypipe
Phil.Henry@polypipe.com
Matthew Axford
Polypipe
mathew.axford@polypipe.com
Mark Fletcher
Arup
mark.fletcher@arup.com
Martin Shouler
Arup
martin.shouler@arup.com
Jennifer Schooling*
Arup
jennifer.schooling@arup.com
Justin Abbott
Arup
justin.abbott@arup.com
Peter Edwards
Arup
peter.edwards@arup.com
Jonathan Yates
Arup
jonathan.yates@arup.com
Siraj Tahir
Arup
siraj.tahir@arup.com
Mark Tindale
Arup
mark.tindale@arup.com
Ori Ainy
Applied Cleantech
ori@actsrs.com
Refael Aharon
Applied Cleantech
refael@actsrs.com
Ezra Barkai
RWL Nirosoft
EBarkai@nirosoft.com
Yossi Yaacoby
Mekorot
yyaacoby@mekorot.co.il
Moshe Sela
AGM Communications& Control
selamo@cabri.org.il
Danny Handler
Top-It-Up
goldan18@gmail.com
Marc Krieger
Aqwise - Wise Water Technologies
Marc@aqwise.com
Zeev Fisher
Mapal Green Energy
zeev@mapal-ge.com
Yoni Dolgin
UK Israel Tech Hub
Yoni@UKIsraelHub.com
Naomi Krieger
UK Israel Tech Hub
naomi@ukisraelhub.com
Simon Spier
Israeli Embassy London
simon.spier@israeltrade.gov.il
∗ Facilitator
6
UK and Israeli delegates
7
Water Innovation and Global Water Investment
Two presentations were given to help stimulate the opportunities in the water sector:
Water innovation:
Necessities, realities and priorities
Keynote presentation by Dr David Lloyd Owen, CEO of Envisager Ltd
Dr David Lloyd Owen presented the key drivers for the UK Water Industry since
privatisation. As well as the situation in the UK, David highlighted how investment
in water supply and drainage can lead to an increase in a nation’s GDP.
See Annex A for David Lloyd Owen’s presentation.
Global Water Investment
A presentation by Jonathan Yates, Associate Director, Arup
Jonathan Yates, Arup covered the global investment treads in the water sector. He
shared work with group, identifying where the money was coming from and to
where it was going in the global water market.
See Annex B for Jonathan Yates’ presentation.
8
Water foresight:
key drivers for the water sector
Workshop session
A facilitated workshop was held to consider the global challenge for the water sector.
The Arup Drivers of Change (Water) cards (www.driversofchange.com) were used to
get the participants reflect on specific water-related issues and how they impact on the
environment, economy and society. Groups were asked to select the three most
important issues affecting water globally and consider how the opportunities and
challenges for the water technology sector.
The results highlighted the following shared view of the key drivers for the
water sector:
•
•
•
•
•
Water security (availability)
Growing global population
The pricing of water and its real value
Opportunities for water re-use
Food production and water use
Water Drivers
9
Current water challenges
Short water bursts of information from UK and Israel water tech companies
Seven speakers from a wide range of experience were selected to give a five minute
presentation on ‘front of mind’ issues which they were working on.
Presenter
Company
Presentation title
1. Booky Oren
Booky Oren Global
Water Technologies
Building a Global Water
Innovation Hub
2. Ezra Barkai
RWL Nirosoft
Global drive and demand for
water treatment and
desalination
3. Ori Ainy
Applied Cleantech
Transforming wastewater:
from burden to commodity
Retrofit and upgrade of
wastewater treatment facilities
- the need of the hour
4. Marc Krieger
Aqwise
5. Matt Axford
Polypipe
Opportunities Local and
Global
6. Professor Roy Kalawsky
Loughborough
University
Innovation in Water
Technology
7. James Kitson
Yorkshire Water
A view from Yorkshire Water
See Annex C for presentations from the ‘Water Burst’ sessions.
10
Opportunities for collaboration: local to global
Workshop session
Four key areas were identified for discussion. These were:
01 Buildings & Districts – decentralised water systems
02 Developed Markets
03 Emerging Markets
04 Water Efficiency
Delegates were asked to contribute potential opportunities from both a local and
global perspective under each of the above headings. Links to other organisations
were also identified.
See Annex D for a summary of the discussions in these four sessions.
11
Opportunity for collaboration: Action plans
In the final session of the day delegates discussed specific opportunities that might
arise, based on the day’s discussions. These were developed in response to the
following questions:
What is the opportunity?
Why is this important?
Who should be involved?
How will they cooperate?
When?
Opportunities: Arising during the workshop
Opportunity 1: Extend Nirosoft's partial water purification capability!
What
Extend Nirosoft's partial water purification capability to embrace the
entire purification cycle, including pre-treatment.
Why
High global demand exists for an end-to-end capability (particularly
applicable to water treatment for industry).
Who
Nirosoft to work with Aqwise and others, facilitated by Arup.
How
Generate a partnership to address a broader spectrum of
contamination types and levels than Nirosoft is able to do alone.
Through technical liaison with Arup engineers, a full-range treatment
services architecture could be created and offered to the market and
to Arup clients.
When
Research can begin immediately.
12
Opportunity 2: Promote waste water retrofits and upgrades capability
What
Promote waste water retrofits and upgrades capability.
Why
A large population of end-of-life or over-capacity treatment plants
exists. This is a limiting factor in urban development.
Who
Aqwise to work with appropriate utilities, together with suitable
engineering consultancies (e.g. Arup) to develop the service.
How
Aqwise could provide the technology component and this could be
marketed as a particular feature of the retrofit package ('Aqwise
inside' akin to 'Intel inside'). The package could be presented as a derisked financial, functional and business model to utilities. A systems
architecture is needed, to show how the various functional
components inter-relate; this can be facilitated by Arup's water
engineers.
When
Can begin immediately.
Opportunity 3: Further Arup-Israeli industry and clients liaison
What
Further Arup-Israeli industry and client liaison.
Why
A mutually valuable cross-pollination opportunity exists. The liaison
could help Arup better to understand the technologies that are
available from Israeli companies and to develop consulting and
design business in Israel.
Who
Arup; Nirosoft; Aqwise; other workshop participant companies.
How
Discussions and evaluation of opportunities with prospective Arup
clients. The work should be underpinned by a suitable industry
taxonomy, to structure the services and capabilities offered by the
industry participants involved.
When
Next quarter.
13
Opportunity 4: Retrofit floating fine bubble aeration for wastewater treatment
What
Retrofit floating fine bubble aeration for wastewater treatment.
Why
It can be installed ‘live’, rather than installing with draw-down. It can
save up to 70% in energy costs and up to 80% in O&M costs.
Who
Arup/Mapal. To UK water utilities.
How
Demonstration project? (reference project). Facilitate discussions
with UK water utilities and Arup process experts.
When
To be confirmed.
Opportunities: Arising subsequently from contacts provided
Opportunity 5: AGM communication and control – interfaces to legacy control
and monitoring systems
What
AGM provides comms and control solutions for SCADA and other
legacy systems, to facilitate their connection and interoperation with
more modern IT systems.
Why
The interface provided by AGM is particularly relevant to retrofit
work of the type that is particularly necessary in upgrading and
improving developed countries’ water (and other utilities)
infrastructure.
Who
AGM (www.agm.co.il) and Arup.
How
Further liaison regarding technical solutions offered, global
capability, pricing structures, future development plans.
When
Q2 2013.
14
Opportunity 6: TaKaDu – Cloud-based water network monitoring
What
TaKaDu provides Software-as-a-Service solutions for monitoring water
distribution networks, to provide real-time control and visibility over
network events. The firm offers advanced statistical and mathematical
algorithms to provide alerts, in real-time, on leaks, bursts, in efficiencies
and other anomalies.
Why
The application of advanced analytics offers substantial promise in
water service providers efforts to improve operations through
innovation. However, the capital cost of installing in-house
equipment is high and this makes difficult the preparation of a
compelling business case. TaKaDu’s service-based offering transfers
the load from Capex to Opex and this may make more palatable to
many providers the initial exploration of such innovative technology.
Who
TaKaDu, Arup and potentially Arup’s existing water provider
customers (e.g. United Utilities, Yorkshire Water, Welsh Water).
How
Potential for evaluation projects leading to practical case studies.
When
Q2 2013.
Opportunity 7: Whitewater – water network management
What
Whitewater offers smart water network management software,
intended to help water services providers to increase operational
efficiency. The company’s products facilitate knowledge sharing,
managing workflows, optimizing plant and distribution operations by
better exploiting data that already exists in utilities’ IT and
operational technology environments.
Why
Services that are proven in the ‘smarter water’ space are an attractive
component of a ‘smart city’ programme and are also relevant to
water services providers seeking to optimise their operations and to
assure regulatory compliance. Hence, Whitewater’s offering may
provide a useful element in Arup’s strategic advice and designs.
Who
Arup, Whitewater, potentially existing clients for evaluation and
possible demonstration.
How
Further evaluation of Whitewater capabilities by Arup specialists,
potentially followed by practical demonstration and proof of concept
work.
15
When
Q2-Q3 2013.
Opportunity 8: Booky Oren Global Water Technologies – ‘Global Water
Partnership Hub’
What
Booky Oren is involved with numerous water services providers and
associated industries and plays a facilitating and integrating role.
Why
Booky may be able to offer useful introductions both of Arup to
potential clients and of firms whose products and services may be of
interest to Arup and its clients.
Who
Direct liaison Arup staff with a focus on water, and Booky Oren
GWT.
How
Arup to provide the ‘Smarter Water’ capability statement to Booky
when it is ready for circulation.
When
Q2 2013.
!
!
16
Opportunity 9: IOSight - infrastructure facility management and water
data management
What
IOSight provides FM and data management services to several
utilities sectors, including water, energy and manufacturing. Their
focus is on data collection, analysis and reporting.
Why
Analytics applied to the water industry will underpin many of the
innovative changes that will be required to improve operational
performance, resilience, energy efficiency and regulatory
compliance. An awareness of IOSight’s capabilities will be
important to Arup, with potential for collaborative work on behalf of
clients.
Who
Arup, IOSight, potentially existing Arup clients with innovation
programmes.
How
Initially liaison to increase awareness of service and product
offerings. Potentially evaluation including practical demonstrators.
When
Q2-Q3 2013.
17
Summary
The workshop provided representatives from the UK and Israeli water sector to
build new relationships and understand the challenges, as they see them in, both
local and global water markets.
Collaborative ideas were developed through a series of facilitated workshops. These
and other opportunities will be pursued in order to bring new and associated
industries.
The workshop also provided an opportunity to strengthen relationships between the
UK and Israel.
18
Annexes
Annex A:
Water innovation: Necessities, realities and priorities
Keynote presentation by Dr David Lloyd Owen, CEO of Envisager Ltd
Annex B:
Global Water Investment
A presentation by Jonathan Yates Associate Director, Arup
Annex C:
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
C.1 Building a Global Water Innovation Hub
A short burst by Booky Oren, Booky Oren Global Water Technologies
C.2 Global drive and demand for water treatment and desalination
A short burst by Ezra Barkai, RWL Nirosoft
C.3 Transforming wastewater: from burden to commodity
A short burst by Ori Ainy, Applied Cleantech
C.4 Retrofit and upgrade of wastewater treatment
facilities - the need of the hour
A short burst by Marc Krieger, Aqwise
C.5 Opportunities local and global
A short burst by Matt Axford, Polypipe
Innovation in Water Technology
A short burst by Professor Roy Kalawsky, Loughborough University
Annex D:
‘Speed Dating’ on water issues
D.1 Buildings and Districts: Facilitated by Martin Shouler, Arup
D.2 Developed marketing: Facilitated by Peter Edwards
D.3 Emerging markets: Facilitated by Jonathan Yates
D.4 Water efficiency: Facilitated by Justin Abbott
20
Annex A
Water innovation:
Necessities, realities and priorities
Keynote presentation by Dr David Lloyd Owen, CEO of Envisager Ltd
Innovation: Necessities,
Realities & Priorities
Water Tech Hub, Arup
4th March 2013
Dr David Lloyd Owen
Envisager Limited
Necessities: Threats to water
security and biodiversity
Vörösmarty (Nature, 2010) looked at the impact of
climate change and population growth globally at
the 50x50 Km level
“What we're able to outline is a planet-wide pattern
of threat”
Data used is 5-10 years old…the reality is worse
Water security will not come cheap
3.4 bn people highlighted as being under threat
Prevailing patterns of threat to
human water security & biodiversity
Necessities: Millennium Development
Goals targets versus outcomes
% of people without safe drinking water
2000 2010 2015 2015
Proj. Target
MDG ‘unimproved’
Unsafe (water quality)
Unsafe (water & sanitary risk)
23% 12%
9% 12%
37% 28% 26% 18%
53% 42% 46% 26%
Int. J. Environ. Res Public Health, 2012, 9, 880-894
CJ Vörösmarty et al. Nature 467, 555-561
(2010) doi:10.1038/nature09440
Millennium Development Goals
Who really has safe drinking water ?
Status of access to ‘safe’ drinking water in 2010
Low sanitary risk
Elevated sanitary risk
Unsafe
Unknown safety
Unimproved
No data
Global Total
Million people
3,180
1,260
1,020
380
780
300
6,900
Range
2,510-3,220
740-2,130
746-1,610
380
780
300
Int. J. Environ. Res Public Health, 2012, 9, 880-894
Necessities: The domestic agenda
Leakage reduction is coming up the agenda
Coping with floods and droughts
Competition as an ideological tool?
Water Framework Directive trundles on to 2029
Bathing Water Directive – a real time world in 2015
Ofwat opens to innovation and efficiency
But wants the sector to share the price pain
Necessities: The energy cost crunch
Electricity as a cost factor in England & Wales
% of operating costs
2003-04
2009-10
Water & sewerage
Sewerage
Sewage treatment
Sludge treatment
8%
14%
27%
10%
13%
24%
38%
6%
Mobile Communications and water:
An Indian Summer
% with
2000
2008
2010
Piped water
‘Improved’ sanitation
Fixed line phones
Mobile phones
20%
25%
1%
0%
22%
31%
1%
22%
23%
34%
1%
63%
Something happens when you have a choice
Innovation has its disruptive charms
Water and CleanTech VC
$998 m of $35,210 m CleanTech VC funding in
2007-11 went to water companies
$80 m out of $3,910 m smart Cleantech VC
funding in 2007-11 went to water companies
Average investment is for $5.0 m
Shift away from early stage since 2006
Water is seen as a peripheral element
Only one dedicated fund (XPV Capital)
Responses:
Mobile Communications and water
In 2008, Kenyan subscribers spent 17% of
household income on mobile phones
They choose this because of the benefits
People unhappy with water services but no change
African networks are offering mobile bill paying
World Bank’s water and sanitation ‘hackathons’
Upraisemyloo – real time logging of household
sanitation data…a bottom up approach
Responses: Smart Water
The addressable market covers advanced
metering, monitoring, automation, testing,
communications, data management and
advanced irrigation systems
Global smart water revenues $0.5-1.0 bn in 2010
(0.5-0.9% of addressable market)
Forecasts for 2020 market size range from $5-16
bn (2.9-9.4% of addressable market)
Responses: Singapore
Water security recognised as a priority issue
Public Utilities Board – charged with making
Singapore self-sufficient by 2060 via its ‘Four
National Taps’ project
Smart grid to monitor all inland water quality
294 private sector R&D projects supported in
2002-10, one improved wastewater recovery
energy efficiency by 300% over seven years
PUB uses PSP when it is more efficient
Responses: Israel
Responses: Malta
Mekorot: 2004, set up the Water Technologies
Entrepreneurship Centre in 2004 for trialling new
ventures via its technological standards
New Efficiency Water Technologies program has
attracted $700 m in private funding for 26 water
technology incubators, underwriting the
innovation installation risk
Utilities have financial incentives to minimise
leakage and to maximise water recovery
Severe water shortages and dependence on desal
(energy accounts for 75% of its opex)
National utility smart metering plan drawn up in
2008-09 supporting demand management
Every household to have an integrated smart water
and electricity meter
Field trial of 5,000 meters in 2010
National roll out 2011-13 at €163 per meter
Responses: England & Wales perceived
Priorities: Spending money – Capex
needed for universal access by 2050
Contradictory policy development, especially
between Ofwat and Defra creates an incoherent
framework for innovation
Water ignored except in flood or drought
No high profile framework for assisting the
financing, mentoring, benchmarking and
commercialisation of UK water innovation
Testing and benchmarking still perceived to be at a
utility rather than a national level
$190-225 bn pa capex is needed against current
capex spend of $170 bn
($ billion)
Urban water
Urban sewage
Rural watsan
Global total
OECD
843-845
1,496-1,479
93-97
2,434-2,441
ROW
1,373-1,934
2,704-3,768
392-467
4,776-6,169
Source: 2CEWWT / Envisager, 2011
Priorities: Infrastructure & GNI per
capita (atlas method, current US$)
Year Singapore
Korea
Malaysia
UK
1962
1970
1980
1990
2000
2009
110
270
1,810
6,000
9,910
19,830
300
400
1,830
2,390
3,450
7,350
N/A
2,230
8,510
16,600
25,910
41,370
450
960
1,910
12,050
23,350
37,220
90% of urban population with:
Red = water, Green = sewerage, Brown = WW treatment
Priorities: UK water policy
Make our water management policy coherent – An
asset intensive industry needs predictability
Accelerate the metering programme – Ofwat will
allow 64-80% by 2020 and 90% by 2030
Get smart – appreciate the role smart water has in
driving innovation, sustainability and efficiency
Tariff Flexibility – Tendring Hundreds per capita
use is 80% of E&W norm
Develop a formal set of water consumption targets
on a river basin basis
Priorities: Enabling innovation
Towards a smarter water policy
Water & wastewater will always be Cleantech’s
‘poor cousin’ – there’s no new dawn looming
This also means the need for innovation is greater
than ever – that will be our golden age
Unless your offering is both better and cheaper
than what’s out there, who should be excited?
Are you getting your message across? Do
potential customers understand your offering?
Management isn’t about bringing a new idea to the
table, it is about managing the entire process
Across the world, water as a sector is often seen
as a proxy for a variety of political debates
Moving from a supply management led paradigm
to a demand management model is essential for
securing supplies in an affordable way
Linkages between water and energy will play a
major role in encouraging efficiency
Innovators can thrive when management can get
the message across
Annex B
Global Water Investment
A presentation by Jonathan Yates Associate Director, Arup
Global Water Investment: what does
that mean for governments,
technology companies and investors?
This presentation will focus on recent
trends in the water sector in the
context of the need for global
investment.
Global Water Investment
Innovation in water technology – 4 March 2013
Global Water Investment
• What type of investments?
What type of investment?
• What is the global need for water investment?
• What are the recent trends?
• How do we facilitate this investment?
3
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
Start-up funding
Clean Tech
Start-up funding
Clean Tech
SME’s
Corporate finance
5
SME’s
Corporate finance
Project finance
Project finance
Leveraged M&A deals
Leveraged M&A deals
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
6
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
• Global access to clean water and sanitation/
What is the global need for water
investment?
<80% urban
population
access to
sanitation
>95%
urban
population
access to
water
Source: World Bank (2012)
8
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
• Real impact on population living in cities/
• Significant increase in
urbanisation
50%
6.8 billion
% of World Population
living in Cities (2012)
3.5
billion
75%
World Population
living in Cities (2012)
% of World Population
living in Cities (2050)
Source: Arup/ C40 UrbanLife - Water Resilience for Cities Report, January 2011
9
Vietnam – Ho Chi Minh City
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
This could mean that 4-6 billion more
people will need access to water and
sanitation by 2050. Conservatively,
this might cost $400 billion in capex.
In size, this is approximately 1/3 of
UK Government spending in
2011/12.
Source: Arup estimate/ Guardian
World Population
living in Cities (2050)
Source: Arup/ C40 UrbanLife - Water Resilience for Cities Report, January 2011/ World Bank/ United Nations
10
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
What are the recent trends?
• Global investment flows (M&A)/
• Private Sector delivery – by project type
$19bn
$2bn
$8bn
$5bn
$11bn
$6bn
<$1bn
<$1bn
Source: Mergermarket analysis
13
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
Source: World Bank
14
• Private Sector delivery – by geography
• Private Sector delivery – by value
Source: World Bank
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
Source: World Bank
16
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
• What can facilitate private
sector investment?
• IFC: “3 R’s”
How do we facilitate this investment?
-  Risk
-  Reward
-  Regulation
• Stable political environment
• Stable economy/ demand
• Sustainable tariffs
• Public (or government)
willing to pay
Arup
15
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
Catchment Highland PPP, Scotland
18
Global Water Investment (4 March 2013)
Arup recent experience is that there is
an continuing appetite amongst the
infrastructure investment community
for high-quality assets in the water
sector. These can only succeed if
they meet the basic investment
criteria and provide balance of risk
and reward.
Annex C
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
C.1 Building a Global Water Innovation Hub
A short burst by Booky Oren, Booky Oren Global Water Technologies
C.2 Global drive and demand for water treatment
and desalination
A short burst by Ezra Barkai, RWL Nirosoft
C.3 Transforming wastewater: from burden to
commodity
A short burst by Ori Ainy, Applied Cleantech
C.4 Retrofit and upgrade of wastewater treatment
facilities - the need of the hour
A short burst by Marc Krieger, Aqwise
C.5 Opportunities local and global
A short burst by Matt Axford , Polypipe
C.6 Innovation in Water Technology
A short burst by Professor Roy Kalawsky, Loughborough University
Annex C.1
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
Building a Global Water Innovation Hub
A short burst by Booky Oren, Booky Oren Global Water Technologies
Booky Oren – Bio
Over the past 28 years, Booky Oren has been active
in a variety of global and local industries and markets;
Turned from the high-tech industry to the water industry
and served as CVP - Business Development at Netafim,
the world's largest drip irrigation company;
The Global Water Technologies Partnership Hub
Executive Chairman of Mekorot, Israel National Water
Company. Initiated and implemented WaTech™ – utilizing the
Mekorot's facilities as beta sites for external innovation;
Co-Founder, President and CEO, later became the
Executive Chairman of Miya, which became the world leader
in the field of urban water losses;
Booky Oren Global Water Technologies LTD.
March 2013
2
Booky Oren – Bio
The Innovation Catch
Chairman of WATEC Israel. The events (2007, 2009 and 2011)
were leading global water events.
In Watec 2011 there were over 28,000 participants from
104 countries, and more than 1,000 international entities;
The existing players cope with
the challenge of i2i innovation To implementation;
In 2011, Oren initiated – Booky Oren Global Water Technologies Ltd.
focuses on implementation of innovative water solutions and operates the: “Global Water
Partnership Hub”.
Challenges in identifying relevant
technologies and solutions;
Challenges in defining the
proper business mechanism.
The will is there … the way is yet to be clear!
3
4
A New Approach - Global Water Partnership Hub
Currently Dozens of Entities are Involved
Initiation of new collaborations
between the existing market players;
Leveraging relevant technological
solutions;
Creating sustainable business
mechanism based on partnerships.
The Global Water Partnership Hub – Win-Win-Win-Win Solution
5
And it is continuously expanding in ALL dimensions…
6
The Global Water Partnership Hub Turns to Reality
And it is a Continuous Process
ONTARIO CLEAN WATER AGENCY
(OCWA) & MEKOROT
SOUTHERN NEVADA WATER AUTHORITY
(SNWA) & MEKOROT
CITY OF AKRON & MEI NETANYA
THE CITY OF GUELPH & MEI NA
PAVIA ACQUE & MEI CARMEL
7
Herzliya, Israel ,September 12, 2012
Connecting the Dots 1
Israel
MWP
Canada/
Ontario
Xylem
…
US
…
9
Innovative Technologies
Connecting the Dots 2
…
Innovative Technologies
Water Utilities Worldwid
Israel
Mekorot
WaTech
US
Reliable Suppliers
Connecting the Dots 3
Israel
Canada/
Ontario
…
OCWA
SNWA
….
Early Adopters
Mekorot
WaTech
MWP
Canada/
Ontario
Xylem
…
US
…
…
Reliable Suppliers
Water Utilities Worldwid
Innovative Technologies
MWP
OCWA
Xylem
…
SNWA
….
Early Adopters
…
Proven Innovations
Reliable Suppliers
Water Utilities Worldwid
Connecting the Dots 4
Israel
Mekorot
WaTech
Canada/
Ontario
US
…
Innovative Technologies
MWP
OCWA
Global
Water
Partnership
Hub
Thank You
…
SNWA
….
Early Adopters
Xylem
Booky Oren Global Water Technologies Ltd.
Chairman &CEO
M:+972 54 6667077
T:972-72-2224008/3 F:972-72-2224005
89, Medinat Hayehudim St., Bldg. E, 8th Fl.
Herzliya, Israel 46766
…
Proven Innovations
Reliable Suppliers
Water Utilities Worldwid
Annex C.2
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
Global drive and demand for water treatment and
desalination
A short burst by Ezra Barkai, RWL Nirosoft
Typical Worldwide Demand
Global&drive&and&
demand&for&water&
treatment&and&
desalina2on!
Acuamed,%Spain!
California,%Desalina3on%!
Desalina3on%in%Israel!
ARUP%04.03.2013!
Israel water resources
California SW desalination
Hadera%Desalina3on%Plant%
127%M%cum/year%
!
Ashdod,%Palmachim%and%Soreq%
Desalina3on%Plants%
200%M%cum/year!
Ashkelon%Desalina3on%Plant%
118%M%cum/year!
Moss%Landing%&%Monterey!
Hun3ngton%Beach%Desalina3on%Plant!
Eilat%Desalina3on%Plant!
Acuamed - Major desalination plants
Carlsbad%Desalina3on%Plant%
50%M%cum/year!
Typical(Seawater(Desalina1on(!
Project%Name:%Episkopi%Desalina3on%Plant%
Loca3on:%%%%%%%%%%Cyprus%
Capacity:%%%%%%%%%%50,000%m3/day%
Market:%%%%%%%%%%%%Municipal%
Delivery:%%%%%%%%%%2012%
Project%Descrip3on((
• ((Open(intake(
• ((Pre6treatment(by(ultrafiltra1on(
• ((Seawater(reverse(osmosis(
• ((IX(Boron(removal((
• ((Remineraliza1on(
• ((Product(pumping(sta1on(and(storage(
(Supply%of%desalina3on%island%%
BOT%for%20%years%
Dual%membrane%system%(UF%&%RO)%offers%smaller%
footprint%and%higher%reliability%
%
Seawater(Desalina1on(!
Project%Name:%Moni%Desalina3on%Plant%
Loca3on:%%%%%%%%%%Cyprus%
Capacity:%%%%%%%%%%22,000%m3/day%
Market:%%%%%%%%%%%%Municipal%
Delivery:%%%%%%%%%%December%2008%%
• ((
Project%Descrip3on%
• ((Open(intake(
• ((Pre6treatment(by(ultrafiltra1on(
• ((Seawater(reverse(osmosis(
• ((Remineraliza1on(
• ((Product(pumping(sta1on(and(storage(
((
(
Moni%was%built%in%a%record%3me%of%eight%months%
Short\term%BOT%for%three%years%
EPC%
www.nirosoft.com
Annex C.3
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
Transforming wastewater: from burden to
commodity
A short burst by Ori Ainy, Applied Cleantech
Transforming WWTPs
Wastewater
Treatment
What is Common Between These?
Wastewater
Recycling
Applied CleanTech
Applied CleanTech
Applied CleanTech
The Sludge Problem
Typical WWTP : 12,000 tonnes/year of sludge
New Business for WWTPs in
Old Market
Environmental and economic burden
50% operation costs
30% capital investment of new plant
Limiting factor to increase capacity
Ori Ainy VP Marketing and Sales, March 2013
Applied CleanTech
Sludge “Solutions”
Transforming Wastewater
Landfill Disposal
Burden
GHG emissions
Valuable
Commodity
Seepage
Agriculture “Fertilizer”
Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and
Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2005
Costly process
Contaminates
Incineration
Costly
Huge capital investment
Harmful air pollution
Requires ash disposal
Disposal and Recycling Routes for Sewage Sludge.
Economic Report, European Commission, 2005
Applied CleanTech
Applied CleanTech
Sewage Recycling
Sludge Treatment Equipment Market
Global Water Intelligence, “Removing the
grudge against sludge" - Vol 13, Issue 12
Sewage mining system
Traps suspended solids from the influent and turns it into a
new commodity:
Sludge management reduce its volume
RecylloseTM: Dry, Sterilized , Odorless and Clean
The smaller the volume the lower the costs
Applied CleanTech
Applied CleanTech’s Framework
Applied CleanTech
Out-Of-The-Box Approach
Prevent sludge formation rather than treat it
Recycle trapped solids into usable
commodity
In a new profitable business model
11
Applied CleanTech
Applied CleanTech
What is Common Between These?
Applied CleanTech
Annex C.4
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
Retrofit and upgrade of wastewater treatment
facilities - the need of the hour
A short burst by Marc Krieger, Aqwise
Annex C.5
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
Opportunities local and global
A short burst by Matt Axford, Polypipe
Opportunities local and global
Water Conservation
Local and global drivers include
Climate change
Legislation
Cost
Planning
Urban development
Mathew Axford
Market Development Director
Water conservation - Polypipe solutions
Rainwater Harvesting
Greywater Harvesting
Blue roof technology
Attenuation
Combined systems a holistic approach
1
Opportunities local and global
Carbon reduction
Local and global drivers include
Legislation – Kyoto - 2020 (1.2 million tonnes pa) and 2050 (80% reduction)
Commercial issues – carbon offsetting
Polypipe solutions
Twin wall pipes negating the need for concrete surrounds as we as reducing soil away and
reducing transportation impacts
Manufacturing excellence – Only UK company to be awarded carbon standard.
Materials substitution
-
Plastics are lighter, stronger, thinner than traditional materials
New materials – Bio-plastics made from biomasses such as vegetable fat or oil
New sales Channels
Internet based sales such a ‘’Screwfix’’
Smart phone apps -Internet Webinar
Export
Driven by depressed global credit crunch
3
2
Annex C.6
Presentations from the short ‘Water Burst’ sessions:
Innovation in Water Technology
A short burst by Professor Roy Kalawsky, Loughborough University
Designing for Adaptability and evolutioN in System of Systems Engineering
Innovation in
Water Technology
Prof Roy S. Kalawsky
Email: r.s.kalawsky@lboro.ac.uk
Systems of Systems
R.S.Kalawsky
Characteristics of a System of System
€12m Project
Tel +44 (0)1509 635678
R.S.Kalawsky
DANSE Consortium
Loughborough
University
THALES
OFFIS
Co-ordinator
Carmeq
INRIA
Rennes
EADS Germany
SODIUS
Advanced Laboratory on
Embedded Systems
EADS France
Industry
IBM Haifa
Israel Aerospace
Industries
Tool Vendor
Research
R.S.Kalawsky
Evolutionary SoS Architecture
R.S.Kalawsky
R.S.Kalawsky
Test Case 1: Integrated Water Treatment and Supply
R.S.Kalawsky
Integrated Water Treatment and Supply
Design Exploration through Run Time analysis
Function and structure
FOAK Method
(SysML)
«bl oc k»
DMS_Technical
Water
Engineering
& Planning
Drinking Water
Supply &
Distribution
power 1..*
Design Exploration
New
Environmental
For Each Silo:
Monitoring & Control
Quality Management
Power Management
Asset Management
Usage analytics & prediction
Maintenance optimization
Forecasting
Rivers and lakes
Underground
water
Water
Sources
doo rClosedS ensors
door Lock edSensor s
output
output
Objectives
Specification
par [block ] EPS_Technic al [Cost_Algebra]
«bl ock, cat alog »
PDB
d oorLatched Sensors
1..*
lo ckAct uat ors
lat chActuator s
Sys tem_Cost:RhpReal
1..*
RDC s
4
network
1..*
PDB_Costs [1.. *]:RhpReal
Constraints
Sys tem_Cost = PDB_Costs ->sum( ) + Cables _Costs ->su...
out up t
outp ut
DM S_ Fun ct io n al.do ors _R:DoorFu nc tiona lit y
1..*
switches
outp ut
«Func tio n»
Clo se Se ns ing
L atc power
hSen sin g
« allo cate »
c ontro l
Stormwater
Management
Run Time analysis
1
c ont ro l
1
R.S.Kalawsky
R.S.Kalawsky
SoS Architecture Analysis & Optimisation
SoS
Specification
SoS Goals
& Contracts
NAF/DoDAF
Systems
Models
Abstraction
UPD
M
Groove
(Graph Grammar)
SoS
SMC Properties
Contracts Specs
System Traces
SoS: Checking & Verification
• Statistical Model Checking
• Contracts Verification
po wer :ni t
1
«b ol ck ,Varyi ng Par »t
DMS Exp anded.DoorCl so edSenso r @ Door2 147:Door Clo sed
Sensor
c ontro l
1
«bol c ,V
k ary nig Par t»
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.RD C@ Doo
rLi2_155:
n k _90 088
RDC
1
power: ni t
bl k V i Pt
Lin k _7 2066
DMS_E
x panded . DoorL atc hActu at or @Door 4_17 7: Doo
r Latc hAct u
a t or
co ntr ol
Lin k _720 70
weig ht:fl oat =
0 . 31 8
na alo g:i nt
devi ce
po wer :ni t
power: ni t
«bol c k,Vary ing Par t»
DMS_E
x panded . Doo
r Lock Act uato r @ Do
o r 4_178: DoorL ockActu at ro
1
bl k V i Pt
DMS_E
x panded . Doo
r Latc hActu at or @Door 2_15 3: Doo
r Latc hAct u
a t or
Lin k _9008 9
Ope r a toi n s
Lin k_ 72071
Op e ar t oi n s
network
Lin k _110 106
netw or k
c ontr ol
power ni: t
co ntr ol
1
«b lo kc ,Vra niy gP
a tr »
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockAct u
a t or@ Door 6_2 26: Doo
r LockAct uato r
power: ni t
bl k V i P t
DMS_Expanded . Do
o r Latc hActu at ro @ Door 6_2 25:D oo
r Latc hActu at or
Linout
k p_1ut
1 0104
«bloc k ,Vra yni gPart»
1
D MS
_ Expand
e d.D o r Clo sedS
e nsor @Door 4_171 : DoorCl o
s edSenso r
power :ni t
c ont or l
ou t up t
1
«bol c k,Vary ing Par t»
1 DMS_E
x panded . Doo
r Lock Act uato bl
r @k Do
o r 4_178: DoorL ockActu at ro
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorL ocked Senso
r @ Door 4_1 74:D o r Lock edSen
s or
1
«bloc ,k Vary in gPart»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL ockActu at ro @ Door _2 154:Door Lo
c kAct uat or
po wer :ni t
power: ni t
power ni: t
Lin k _110 107
power: ni t
Lin k _900 86
c ont ro l
«bloc k, VaryLiin gP
k ar
_90
t» 0 84
DMS_E
x panded . RDC@ Door 6_ 229:R DC
power:i nt
de v ci e
power:i nt
1
b« olc k ,Var yni gP
a rt »
DMS_Exp
a nded.Contr olle r @ Avio nic s Bay_1 02: Con
tro
l el r
«bol c k,Vary in gPar »t
DMS_E
x panded . w
S ti ch @Swit ch Bay 1_113 : Swit ch
outp ut
power: ni t
1
networ k [NumOfPor st ]
1
«bloc k »
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorL ocked Senso
r @ Door 6_2 22:D o r Lock edSen
s or
co ntr ol
Lin k _110 106
c ont ro l
1
Op e ra t oi n s
bl k V i P t
DMS_Expanded . Do
o r Latc hActu at o
r @ Door 6_2 25:D oo
r Latc hActu at or
netw or k
power n:i t
c ontr ol
power :ni t
Li nk _110104
1
bl k V i Pt
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.Door o
L ckAct au t or @Door 1_14 2: Doo
r LockA tc uato r
power: ni t
c ontro l
power :ni t
1
1
bl k V i P t bl k V i Pt
DMS_Exp anded.
DMS_Ex
DoorL ockAct
p anded.
u at
Do
oor
r@
L atDoor
c hAct
6_226:
uat orDoor
@Door
L
o ckAct
1_141 u
a: tDoor
or L atc hAct au t or
Lin k _65 062
power: ni t
c no tr ol
dev ci e
1
de v ci e
power:i nt
«bloc k V
,1 ar yni gP
a rt»
«bol c ,V
k ary nig Par t»
DMS xEpanded . RDC@ Door 1145: RDC
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.RD C@ Doo
r 6_229:RDC
network
Lin k_ 65059
Lin k _1101 03
Lin k _65 058
po wer :ni t
1
«bl oc k, V
a ry in gPart»
D MS_Expand
e d.C n
ot o
r l er@ Avio nic s Bay_105:Contr olle r
netw or k
1
b« clo k ,Vra yni gP
a rt »
DMS_Exp
a nded.Contr olle r @ Avio nic s Bay_1 02: Con
tro
l le r
Li nk _81044
power:i nt
c ontr ol
po wer :ni t
netw ro k
Lin k _650 44
networ k
power: ni t
c ontro l
1
bl k V i Pt
DMS_Exp anded.DoorL atc hAct uat or @Door 1_141 : DoorL atc hAct u
a t or
outp ut
Lin k _1 10106
co ntr ol
po wer :ni t
power:i nt
1
11
«b lo kc »
«b
« lb o
c k, V
aV yr ni gP
P ar
a t»
r
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockedS
DM
e nsor
_SExpan
@Dd ed.
or D
1_1
oor
3 8:LatDoor
chAct
L ocke
u ato
d rSensor
@ Door6_225:Door Lat chActu ato r
Li nk_ 40044
co ntr ol
1
bl k V i Pt
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.Door L
o ckAct au t or @Door 1_14 2: Doo
r LockA tc uato r
power :i nt
outp ut
po wer :ni t
outp ut
power ni: t
power: ni t
1
«bloc ,k Vary ni gPart»
1
«bloc k ,Var yni gP
a rt »
1
«bloc k V
, ar yni gP
a rt»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL ockActu at ro @ Door 3_ 166:Door Lo
c kAct au t or
D MS_Expanded D
. o r Clo sedSen sor @D o r 6_220 : DoorC o
l es dSenso
Dr MS_Expand
e d.D o r Clo sedS
e nsor @D o r 1_136 : DoorCl so edSenso r
Lin k _65 062
outp ut
power :i nt
1
«bol c k»
Lin k _100 098
c ontro l
D MS
_ Expand
e d.D1oor Lo
c kedSen
s or @ Doo
r 5_210«b
: olDoor
c k,Var
L yocked
in gPra t»Sensor
DMS_E
x panded . DoorL ockA ct uato r @ Doo
r 5_214:DoorL ockActu at ro
power: ni t
1
«bol c k,Vary nig Par t»
DMS xEpanded . S
w itc h @ Swit ch Bay 1 10 8: Swit ch
Lin k _81 080
power: ni t
dev ci e
1
«bloc k V
, ra yni gP
a rt»
DMS xEpanded . RDC@ Door 1145: RDC
networ k[ NumOfPor ts ]
power:i nt
network
Lin k _650 44
c ontr ol
1
«b ol ck V
, aryi ng Par t»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL at h
c Act uat or @D o r 5_213 : DoorL at h
c Act uat or
power: ni t Li nk _10009 3
Lin k _1 00095
outp ut
1
«b lo ck »
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockedSen sor @D o r 3_162 : DoorL ocked Sensor
po wer :ni t
Lin k _100 044
power ni: t
1
bl k V i P t
po wer :ni t
DMS_Exp
a nded.
de S
v wi
ci te ch
1 @Swi ct h Bay 1_113:
«bol c ,V
k ar
Swi
y tgni Pa
ch
r t»
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.RD C@ Doo
r 3_167:RDC
netw or k N
[ umOf oPr st ]
netw or k
Lin k _41
Lin 0k 49
_81 077
ou tp ut
power ni: t
1
1
outp ut
1
«b lo kc »
power: ni t
«bl oc »k
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockedSen sor @D o r 3_162 : DoorL ocked Sensor
DMS_Expanded . Doo
r Lock edSenso r @ Door 5_ 210:Door Lo
c kedSen sor
network 1
b« ol ck ,Vary nig Par »t
DMS_Expan ded.Cont o
r le r @ Avio nic s Bay_102: Contr olle r
po wer :ni t
Lin k _81 077
de v ci e 1
«bol c k,Vary nig Par t»
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.RD C@ Doo
r 3_167:RDC
power n:i t
1
«bloc k V
, ar yni gP
a rt »
D MS_Expanded D
. o r Clo sedSen sor @D o r 5_207 : DoorC o
l se dSenso
r
«b ol ck ,Vra yi ng Par t»
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorCl so edSen
s or @ Door3_159:Door Clo sed Sensor
outp ut
Li nk _10009 8
1
«b lo ck ,Vary nig Par »t
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL at h
c Act uato r @ Do
o r 5_213: DoorL at ch
A tc uato r
po wer :ni t
c ontr ol
c ontro l
Li nk_ 65062
outp ut
1
«bl oc k, Vary ni gPart»
D MS_Expanded R
. DC@ Door _1 145:RD C
po wer :ni t
1
Lin k _6 5044
1
«b ol ck ,Vra yni gP
a tr »
DMS_Exp anded.DoorL atc hAct uat or @Door 3_165 : DoorL atc hAct u
a t or
«bol c k,Vary nig Par t»
DMS_Expanded . Doo
r Lock Act uato r @D o r 3_166: DoorL ockActu at ro
power: ni t
Li nk_ 65059
power:i nt
Lin k _81077
dev ci e 1
«bloc k ,Var yni gP
a rt »
DMS_E
x panded
. RDC@ Door 3_16 7: RDC
outp ut
1
«bl oc k, Vary ni gPart»
DM _SExpan
d ed.Door Clo sed
Sensor @Door 1_13 6: DoorCl so edSen
s or
power: ni t
network
Li nk_ 81075
Component Data
Lin k _81 079
power:i nt
Agent-based
Sim
Toolnetconnections
Objectives
Specification
SV-10c
(e.g. SysML
State-Machine)
Co-Simulation
Operational
Performance
Analysis
Human
Aspects
(Decisions)
Performance
TBD
Component Data
CS native
models
FMI
FMI
Emergent
Behaviour
Analysis
c ont ro l
outp ut
Lin k _6 5058
power: ni t
Li nk _81080
1
«bol c k,Vary ni gPart»
DMS_Expan ded.DoorC o
l sed Senso
r @ Door 3_1 59: Doo
r Clo sedSen sor
bl k V i Pt
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorL atc hAct u
a t or @Door 1_14 1: DoorL atc hAct u
a t or
power ni: t
power :i nt
net work
c ontro l
c ont ro l
Lin k _810 44
1
«bl oc k»
D MS_Expand
e d.D o r Lock edSen
s or @ Doo
r 3_162:Door L
o ckedS
e nsor
1
Lin k_ 65061
po wer :ni t
devi c e
Lin k _81079
power ni: t
1
«bloc k, Vary ni gPart»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL ockActu at ro @ Door _5 214:Door Lo
c kAct uat or
po wer :ni t
1
«b lo ck »
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockedS
e nsor @D o r 1_13 8: DoorL ocked Sensor
power: ni t
1
«bloc k ,Vra yni gP
a rt»
D MS_Expand
e d.D o r Clo sedS
e nsor @D o r 1_136 : DoorCl so edSenso r
1
«bl oc k, Vary ni gPart»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL ockActu ato r @ Door _1 142:Door Lo
c kAct au t or
po wer :ni t
ne t work [NumOf Por ts ]
Lin k _10 0095
ou pt ut
power :ni t1
outp ut
c ontr ol
1
«bloc k ,Var yni gP
a rt »
DMS_Expan ded.Swit ch @ Switc h B ay _1 108:Swi ct h
Lin k _8107 5
Li nk _100044
power ni: t Li nk_ 100093
power: ni t
Lin k _81 080
Lin k _400 44
po wer :ni t
netw or k
outp ut
po wer :ni t
1
«bloc k, Vary in gPart»
c ontro l DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL ockActu at ro @ Door 3_ 166:Door Lo
c kAct u
a t or
1
«b ol ck ,Var niy gP
a tr »
DMS_Exp anded.DoorL atc hAct uat or @Door 3_165 : DoorL atc hAct u
a t or
power:i nt
power: ni t
networ k 1
«bloc k, Vary ni gPart»
Lin k _100 098
c ontro l
1
DMS_E
x panded . Con
t «b
r ol cel k,V
r ar
@yAvi
ni gPraon
t»i cs Bay_ 105:C o
nt o
r l er
DMS_E
x panded . DoorL ockA ct uato r @ Doo
r 5_214:DoorL ockActu at o
r
power ni: t
«b ol ck ,Vra yi ng Par t»
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorCl so edSen
s or @ Door3_159:Door Clo sed Sensor
outp ut
Lin k _65 058
c ontr ol
Li nk _81044
Lin k _81079
Lin k _8107 5
networ k
1
«b ol ck ,Varyi ng Par t»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL at h
c Act uat or @D o r 5_213 : DoorL at h
c Act uat or
Lin k_ 65059
Lin k _1100 49
Lin k _44 049
power: ni t
dev ci e 1
b« ol ck V
, ar yi ng Par t»
DMS_Exp
a nded.RDC @Door 5_21 6: RDC
Lin k _1000 97
c ontr ol
outp ut
Design
Patterns
power: ni t
Lin k _65 061
networ k
c ontr ol
Graph
Grammars
power: ni t
1
«b ol ck V
, aryi ng Par t»
D MS
_ Expand
e d.D o r Lo
c kAct uat or @Door 4_178 : DoorL ockActu ato r
Lin kLi_6
n k5 _061
1 10107
power i: nt
Li nk _44049
power: ni t
«bol c k,Vary gni Par »t
DMS E
x panded . S
w itc h @ Swit ch Bay 1 10 8: Swit ch
Lin k _100 044
Lin k _1 00095
dev ci e 1
«b lo ck V
, ar iy ng Par t»
DMS_Exp
a nded.RDC @Door 5_21 6: RDC
1
«bloc k V
, ary ni gPart»
D MS_Expand
e power
d.D o r ni:Clto sedS
e nsor @Door 5_207 : DoorCl so edSenso r
networ k
Statistical
Models
power: ni t
po wer :ni t
al te nc y: ofl at= 50.0
Lin k _90 089
Li nk_ 40044
Lin k_ 110049
1
power: ni t Li nk _10009 3
outp ut
de v ci e 1
«b ol ck V
, ary gin Par t»
DMS_Expan ded.RDC @D oo
r 5_216: RDC
CSL
1
bl k V i P t
D MS_Expanded D
. o r Latc hActu at ro @ Door 4_1 77:D oo
r Latc hActu at or
Li nk_ 90088
1
«bol c ,V
k ary nig Par t»
DM S
_ Expan
d ed.RD C@ Doo
r 4_179:RDC
network
Lin k_ 110103
1
bl kV i P t
DMS_Expan ded.DoorC o
l se dSenso
r @ Door 6_ 220:D o r Clo sedSen sor
netw or k
power :i nt
1
«bol c k»
D MS
_ Expand
e d.Door Lo
c kedSen
s or @ Doo
r 5_210: DoorL ocked
Sensor
networ k[ NumOfPor ts ]
1
«bloc k V
, rya ni gPart»
D MS_Expand
e d.D o r Clo sedS
e nsor @Door 5_207 : DoorCl so edSenso r
Lin k _1000 97
SoS Integrated Modelling & Simulation Environment
Optimization of water supply based on predetermined priorities
Energy consumption optimization
Regulation of overall water quality by balancing of
inputs and outputs of the constituent systems:
Enhancement of the water supply system resilience
in an integrated net of water supply sources as
structural changes occur over time
Enhancement of the water supply system
robustness in emergency situations
R.S.Kalawsky
c ont ro l
power:i nt
al te nc y fl: oat 5= 0.0
power:i nt
network
power :ni t
Li nk _44049
outp ut
FMI
UPDM/ NAF etc
power: ni t
«b ol ck V
, ar yni gP
a rt »
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorL atc hAct u
a t or @Door 2_15 3: DoorL atc hAct u
a t or
1
«bloc k ,Var niy gP
a t»r
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockActu at o
r @ Door 2_1 54: Doo
r Lock Act uato r
power ni: t
ou t up t
power :ni t
«bloc k, Vary in gPart»
DMS_E
x panded . RDC@ Door 4_ 179:R DC
dev ci e
«bloc ,k Vary ni gPart»
DMS_E
x panded . RDC@ Door _6 229:R DC
power i: nt
Lin k _90049
power: ni t
po wer :ni t
«bl oc ,k V
a yr ni gPart»
1
D MS_Expand
e d.C n
o t ro l er@ Avio nic s Bay_105:Contr olle r
Lin k _41 049
outp ut
outp ut
Li nk _10009 7
C4I System –
decentralized
w/ TETRA
Architecture
Modelling
c ontr ol
power: ni t
bl k V i Pt
DMS_E
x panded . DoorL atc hActu at or @Door 4_17 7: Doo
r Latc hAct u
a t or
1
bl k
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockedS
e nsor @D o r 4_17 4: DoorL ocked Sensor
Li nk _90086
1
Lin k _110 107
dev ci e 1
Lin k_ 110103
Lin k_ 110049
«bol c k,Vary in gPar t»
DMS_E
x panded . w
S ti ch @Swit ch Bay 1_113 : Swit ch
networ k [NumOfPor st ]
networ k
FOAK Method
(SysML)
«expand,c atalo g»
loc k Act u ato rs :Do o rLo c kActu at or
«ex pand,c atalog»
d oorClo sedS ens ors: Do orClos edSe nso r
Operational
Sequence/ Behaviour
Goals: Integrated water treatment and supply (IWTS)
SoS : Joint Simulation
• Joint Simulation
• Performances Evaluation
outp ut
po wer :ni t
1
«b ol ck ,Vra yni gP
a rt »
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockAct u
a t or@ Door 6_2 26: Doo
r LockAct uato r
Lin k_ 72068
Li nk_ 90084
Lin k _11 0104
1
«bol c k»
outp D
ut MS
_ Expand
e d.Door Lo
c kedSen
s or @ Doo
r 6_222: DoorL ocked
Sensor
1
bl kV i P t
DMS_Expan ded.DoorC lo es dSenso
r @ Door 6_ 220:D o r Clo sedSen sor
1
«ex pand,c atalog»
1
lat chActu ato rs :Do orLat chAct
1
1
SV4
R.S.Kalawsky
SoS
Structure
1
Lin k _90 088
power:i nt
Lin k _9008 9
out up t
1
«b ol ck ,Vary ing Par t»
power: ni t
DMS_Exp
«bloca knded.
» DoorCl ose dSenso
r @ Door 4_ 171:Door Clo sedS
e nsor
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorL ocked Senso
r @ Door _2 150:D o r Lock edSen
s or
co ntr ol
Lin k _90 049
outp ut
Lin k _41 049
«ex pand,catalo g»
c on trolle rs :Con trolle r
«expand,c at alog»
d oo rL atch ed Sen so rs:Do orL a
Enablers
Sewage Treatment
1
Lin k _72 071
Ope r a toi n s
network
po wer :ni t
c ont ro l
Lin k _72070
weig ht: olf at= 0.1 38
analo g:ni t
Ope r a oti n s
1
Lin k _720 49
power i: nt
1
«bol c k»
D MS
_ Expand
e d.Door Lo
c kedSen
s or @ Doo
r 6_222: DoorL ocked
Sensor
«blo c k »
T ech nica l::DMS_T ech nica l
«ex pand ,catalo g»
1
1
SV4
SV1
po wer :ni t
1
«b ol ck V
, ary ing Par t»
DMS Exp
a nded.DoorCl ose dSenso r @ Door 2147:Door Clo sed
Sensor
Lin k _720 66
bl k V i P t
DMS_E
x panded . RDC@ Door 2_ 155:R DC
al te nc y :fl oat 5= 0.0
outp ut
TotalCost:RhpReal
« allo cate »
dev ci e 1
Waste Water
(Sewage)
Management
power: ni t
«b ol ck ,Var yni gP
a rt »
DMS_E
x panded
. DoorL atc hAct u
a t or @Door 2_15 3: DoorL atc hAct u
a t or
1
«bloc k ,Vra yni gP
a rt»
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockActu at ro @ Door 2_1 54: Doo
r Lock Act uato r
out up t
1
power:i nt
dev ci e
outp ut
«opti mi zed»
« At tribut e»
Sy stemCost:RhpReal
« allo cate »
«a l ocat e»
« a lo cate »
« alloc ate»
po wer Bays
do orLo cked Se ns ors:
SV1
c ontr ol
power :ni t
1
bl k
DMS_Expan ded.DoorL ockedS
e nsor @D o r 4_17 4: DoorL ocked Sensor
Li nk _90086
dev ci e
Lin k _90 049
network
power
1
C4I System –
centralized
w/ LTE
1
Lin k _72 071
power:i nt
po wer :ni t
1
«b lo ck ,Vary nig Par t»
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorCl ose dSenso
r @ Door _4 171:Door Clo sedS
e nsor
Li nk_ 90084
PowerCable
po wer :ni t
c ont ro l
Lin k _72070
weig ht: ofl at= 0.1 38
analo g:ni t
outp ut
out pu t
«block,catal og»
«Function»
Lo ck ing
«Func tio n»
1
Functional::DMS_ Functi
Storm water
FMI
«bloc ,k Vary ni gPart»
DMS_E
x panded . RDC@ Door _4 179:R DC
power i: nt
Lin k _72068
Lin k _72 049
1
«Func tio n»
1
Functional::DM S_Funct
L oc kSen sin g
1
«bol c k»
D MS_Expand
e d.D o r Lo
c kedSen
s or @ Doo
r 2_150:DoorL ockedS
e nsor
«Func tion»
1
La tc hin g
«Func tion»
1
« alloc ate »
Desalination
Constituent
Systems
Models
bl k V i P t
DMS_E
x panded . RDC@ Door _2 155:R DC
1
dev ci e
Ope r a toi n s
«Func ti on»
1
po wer
«b lo ck ,Vary nig Par t»
1
DMS Exp
a nded.DoorCl ose dSenso r @ Door 2147:Door Clo sed
Sensor
Lin k _720 66
1
Lin k _72 049
network
1
power
control
control
power
Irrigation
Systems
R.S.Kalawsky
power :i nt
1
«bol c k»
D MS_Expand
e d.D o r Lo
c kedSen
s or @ Doo
r 2_150:DoorL ockedS
e nsor
Lin k _72068
Cables_Cos ts[1..*]:RhpReal
«Func tio n»
contr ollers
network
Architectures on
efficient frontier
TotalCost:RhpReal
« Const rai ntP ropert y»
EPS_Techni cal.CF:CostF ormulae
output
Optimization Problem
Formulation (CPLEX)
«catal og»
1
swit chToSwitchConnector
1 ..*
1..*
2
Water Purification
Water
Management
pow er 1..*
power
power
1
«bloc k, Vary ni gPart»
D MS_Expanded D
. o r Latc hActu at ro @ Door 3_1 65:D oo
r Latc hActu at or
power: ni t
power: ni t
1
«b lo ck »
DMS_Exp
a nded.DoorL ocked
Sensor @Door 1_13 8: DoorL ocked Senso
r
power :ni t
power: ni t
Annex D
‘Speed Dating’ on water issues
D.1 Buildings and Districts
Facilitated by Martin Shouler, Arup
D.2 Developed marketing
Facilitated by Peter Edwards, Arup
D.3 Emerging markets
Facilitated by Jonathan Yates, Arup
D.4 Water efficiency
Facilitated by Justin Abbott, Arup
Annex D.1
‘Speed Dating’ on water issues
Buildings and Districts
Facilitated by Martin Shouler, Arup
Martin Shouler – Arup (Facilitator)
Danny
Marc
Derendran
Yoni
HJK
Ori
Roy K – Loughbourgh University
Matt Axford –Polypipe
Siraj Tahir
Refal Aharon –Applied Cleantech
RSimons
1.
2.
3.
4.
Easier to
Existing Build Retrofitting
No incentive
New Build
Innovate
Non-potable water systems
Decentralised Systems
Buildings & Districts
Energy relationships
Is there sufficient Infrastructure Capacity?
Costs
What is the appropriate scale of
decentralised systems?
Why, Who What
Scale
Water
Technology to enable
Decentralisation is now available
Water supply
Water Re-use
Energy use
Carbon
Intensity
Needs
-Sub Quality (Non Potable)
- Need for water quality standards
Water Quality
Water Footprint
Water Scarcity
Florida is an example of
centralised non-potable water
supply (e.g. Conserv II)
Global
Need to identify
areas of water
scarcity
Behaviour Change
Peer pressure (Psychological pressure)
Awareness
Perception (Acceptability?)
Issues
Annex D: Buildings & Districts
Used to this type of
decision making
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. Lack of competition
2. Should be 30% cheaper than supplied mains water
3. Wastewater should be considered as a resource
Water reuse
Separation
Natural systems
Energy recovery
Technology
Incentives/ Disincentives:
Who is responsible?
Who has ability to deal
with strategic issues?
Risks?
Governance
Easier to demonstrate to a private commercial user
than to a water utility
Return on Investment
Industrial:
Commercial: Easier than residential
Residential: Difficult to organise
Annex D.2
‘Speed Dating’ on water issues
Developed marketing
Facilitated by Peter Edwards
Delay/stop
Drive
Can’t
cope
Environmentalists
Social
media
+ more
constrained by
Better/faster
decisions
E.g. “Smart Cities”
Developed
Markets
Value
proposition and
legislation
main focus
*Driver = Energy cost
*Old
Infrastructure
-
Technology (eg
smart metering
g.m. bugs?
Behavioural
change
Dynamic
tariffs
Local
treatment
plants?
Energy
decentralise
linkage
Water
Emerging upgrade
market
“Don’t touch it!”
* Old heterogeneous
infrastructure
Need
higher
quality
Drivers
Inhibitor
Opportunities
Technologies
*can afford more
sophisticated
technology?
*Insufficiently
holistic
approach
Industry investment much easier
Established
=> “Fixed”
overcome
conservative
Regulatio
n
Security
-upgrade/fix leaks etc
-retrofit
Opportunities/
Challenges
Need
resilience
SLOWER
to react
IT to be =>
real time info
*Less “hungry” (for
innovation/change)
*Bigger
picture focus
*More
extremes
(climate)
*Hard to get
new
ideas/innovation
into acceptance
Annex D: Developed Markets
Annex D.3
‘Speed Dating’ on water issues
Emerging markets
Facilitated by Jonathan Yates
Market
(influences)
leaders:
Elected?
Consultants/engineers
National ??? e.g. subsidy
56%
Demand to treat
waste water (or
water)
Clients
Designers
Financial institutions
Manufacturers
EPC contractors
Regulatory authorities/Government
Public
Stakeholders
Emerging markets
Risk – changing political
environment (maybe quickly)
Regional banks e.g. Africa
East bank
-????? as
product/resource
-i.e. water reuse for
irrigation
Other benefits
For emerging
markets
“appropriate”
regulation +
standards
Regulatory
platform
Influence:
Demand for
services
-Performance payments (flow/quality)
-Service/O&M
Right commercial
model?
Water
quality (to
Health!)
Risk
SUITATION
WATER
EDUCATION
Annex D: Emerging Markets
Pre-conceived ideas
(of solutions) and
politics …
Market access
developers in
emerging markets
Simple process
(appropriate)
PILOT
STDUY
Not metering
consent
Done elsewhere
(other markets)
Risk averse
consultants?
Over-cautious
approach/specification
(in Govt contracts)
Affordable +
cost effective
solutions
More land (???
not a problem)
Annex D.4
‘Speed Dating’ on water issues
Water efficiency
Facilitated by Justin Abbott
Green
deal
•Crop per drop
Data
manage
ment
Information
on water use
Agricultu
re (non
food)
Data
sensors
New crop
strains
Quality
AGRICULTURE A LOT TO DO
Water
footprint
Borrow
Annex D: Water efficiency
Over
irrigate
Better
seniors
Drip
irrigation
Incentives
water
recycling
Micro
pollutants
End users
250l/h/d
Engage
ment
Education
Simulation
DATA
what to
monitor?
Water Efficency
BEHAVIOURS
•priorities
Bang for
your buck
$ 20m3 $2.5/m3
$5.0/m3
Modelling
Knowledge
Retrofit
Alternative water
CAPEX
Innovate on
retrofit
Welfare
DATA
Pollution
AMR AMI
Metering
Leakage
DESAL
EFFICIENCY
Maintaining
water quality
Technological
efficiency
Catchment
efficiency
Health
How to collect info
without information
No metering – no
dynamic
tariffs with energy
Health
service
Drug
Knowledge
on the
community
Production on
low tariffs and
storage
Base load on
electricity
costs