Weaving Intellectual Property Rights in Creativity, Knowledge Creation, Innovation and Commercialisation Prabuddha Ganguli MHRD IPR Chair Professor Tezpur University, Assam and CEO “VISION-IPR”, Mumbai prabuddha.ganguli@gmail.com TAA-JRD Tata Lecture TIFR, Mumbai, India 28-07-2014 pganguli©1998-2014 Government Agencies Enterprises Inter & Intra networking Funding Agencies, Financial institutions Academic Institutions Inter and intra networking R&D Institutions VENDORS Global Symbiotic networking ….possible?? pganguli©2001-2014 pganguli©2001-2014 pganguli©2001-2014 pganguli©2014 Collapsing of innovation cycle times crashing of products and services life cycles pganguli©2001-2013 IPR Institutional Asset pganguli©1998-2014 pganguli©2014 Perceptions vs Reality – Four Blindfolded Men who encountered an elephant and said “The elephant is like a wall” “The elephant is like a snake” “The elephant is like a pillar” “The elephant is like a rope” pganguli©2001-2014 Balancing of Interests Promoting Private Producer Disclosure Public User / Consumer Rights Obligations Monopoly Competition “Private Interest Must Yield Public Good” pganguli©1998-2014 pganguli©2001-2011 LAYOUT DESIGNS FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS COPYRIGHT ANTI COMPETITIVE PRACTICES IN CONTRACTUAL LICENSES pganguli©1998 Invention Facilitator…..The Patent Framework “Before [the patent regime], any man might instantly use what another had invented; so that the inventor had no special advantage from his own invention. The patent system changed this; secured to the inventor, for a limited time, the exclusive use of his invention; and thereby added the fuel of interest to the fire of genius, in the discovery and production of new and useful things.” Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln, second lecture on discoveries and inventions, delivered to the Phi Alpha Society of Illinois College at Jacksonville, Illinois, February 11, 1859 in Vol. III The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Roy P. Basler ed. (New Brunswick, N.J., Rutgers University Press, 1953) p 363. Available at http://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/ pganguli©2014 Trademarks Sumitomo Rose Scented Tyres pganguli©2014 Design Registration for Packaging of Shrimps pganguli©2001-2013 Subject matter for Industrial Design Registrations pganguli©2001-2014 TRADITIONALPOCHAMPALLY IKAT SILK SAREES …..GI pganguli©2009-2013 pganguli©2001-2014 PATENTS.......... INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE MINE BIBLIOGRAPHIC TECHNICAL LEGAL pganguli©1998-2014 PATENTS AS INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE SOURCE • STRATEGIC PROTECTION, RAISING BARRIERS FOR THE COMPETITORS & ENSURING FREEDOM TO USE INVENTIONS * TECHNICAL IFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE * MONITORING TECHNOLOGY TRENDS * IDENTIFYING EMERGING RESEARCH AREAS * SPOTTING BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES * TOOL TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL OPTIONS & THREATS * TOOL TO IDENTIFY POSSIBLE COLLABORATORS, MERGERS OF EFFIRTS, STRATEGIC ALLIANCES BASED ON TECHNOLOGICAL & GEOGRAPHICAL STRENGTHS. BUSINESS PARTNERS NOTE: Useful both in Business & Research pganguli©2001-2014 Are Patent Databases “Open Sources” that can be used freely ?? • Patent Databases are most structured “open source” for technical information and knowledge that is accessible in the most facile way on the net which can be used freely. • Patent information and knowledge can be used for research and technology development • However if the knowledge claimed in valid patents are used for commercially exploitation in subsequent inventions by others, then certain legal processes have to be followed to ensure “freedom to operate”. pganguli©2014 ANI Patent Portfolio US 062697 US 8003165 US 6692574 US 6479939 US 6582780 US 6664728 US 6630023 US 7791258 US 6885022 US 7696272 Nanomaterials US 6897603 US 6613204 CNT Composites Thermal Management Nanoparticles US 6975063 US 7611906 US 7057203 US 7563722 US 7070651 US 7560134 US 6310432 US 6296740 US 7195938 US 6312303 US 6432206 US 7531155 US 7244513 US 7514369 US7462498 pganguli©2012 ANI Patent Portfolio US 6580225 US 7960718 US 6181056 US 6573643 US 6588909 US 7854861 US 6726335 US 7842522 US 6750461 US 7176877 Nanoelectronics US 7125308 US 6819034 Nanoparticle Inks Nanoparticle Pastes Exclucent™ materials US 7078716 US 6819035 US 7057758 US 6849856 US 7040948 US 6933670 US 6504311 US 6084338 US 6979947 US 7011927 pganguli©2012 US 6572232 US 6552563 US 6573643 US 7736209 US 7728520 US 7462498 US 6411020 US 6577355 US 6417686 US 6586889 US 6213837 US 6616284 US 7306896 US 6204834 US 6629869 CNT Electron Emission Electron Emission Activities CNT Display Applications US 6635986 US 6107732 US 7057578 US 6664722 ANI Patent Portfolio US 6975063 US 6739932 US 6111354 US 6798127 US 6127773 US 6008595 US6777869 US D422575 US 6854850 US 6958576 US 6064148 US 6441543 pganguli©2012 US 7950271 US 6849911 US 7695609 US 7782462 US 7104111 US 7821412 Nanosensors Metal Nanoparticle Sensors Enzyme coated Carbon Nanotube Sensors Sono Photonic Sensors Ion Mobility Sensors US 7237429 US 7762121 US 7674628 US 7287412 US 7647813 US7452735 US 7575720 US 7632548 ANI Patent Portfolio US 7597788 pganguli©2012 Growth of Nanotechnology Patents, 2000, 2002, 2004. [Source: Clarkson G, DeKorte D (2006) The Problem of Patent Thickets in Convergent Technologies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1093:180-200]. pganguli©2012 Some Options for the IP proprietor • Use the IP … manufacture the product, use the process, sell by self or by contracting it to another party. • Rent (licence) the rights to someone for manufacturing but market the product by self or by contracting it to another party. • Cross License for mutually independent working and / or collaborative working • Sell (assign) the IP Rights • Set-up a Joint venture with appropriate benefit sharing arrangements. • Source of one-time or steady long term income from the license fees/royalties • Negotiate License for manufacture by and /or marketing with geographical breakup of the markets. pganguli©2001-2014 Some Options available to the IPR Holder • Barter rights • Establish a franchise system involving other parties • Take action against those who infringe the IP • Let the rights selectively lapse in certain countries pganguli©2001-2012 Inspiration or copying??? Knock Out a product of inspiration or a copy of Phone Booth Knock Out, starring Sanjay Dutt, Irrfan and Kangna Ranaut faced allegations of being an outright copy of Phone Booth starring Colin Farrell. The first case was filed by 20th Century Fox just before Knock Out was about to be released. At that time, the court had passed an injunction against the release after watching both the films. On appeal, the producers were allowed to release the film, subject to them having deposited R 1.5 cr with the court The matter was heard again and the court has decreed the case and awarded Rs 1.25 cr to Fox. The producers of Phone Booth were also not permitted to exploit their film in any manner whatsoever from March 5, 2013 onwards. pganguli©2014 Krazzy 4 ….copied portions of jingles created by Ram Sampat Sampath filed a case against the film's producer, Rakesh Roshan, and music director, Rajesh Roshan, stating that he was not given due credit for Krazzy 4's music. His name was not mentioned on Krazzy 4's audio CDs, and that's the reason he sought legal action and filed a case of copyright infringement. The court instructed the Roshans to delete two songs, Krazzy 4 and BreakFree, if they want to release the film on April 11, 2008. pganguli©2014 Krazzy 4 contd. The Judge who listened to both Sampath's work for a Sony Ericsson cellphone advertisement, and the two songs composed by Rajesh Roshan for the film stated: "To my untrained ear, the music (in two works) appeared to be similar" The judge held that though the advertisement jingle was only for a few seconds, it was the 'catch phrase or hook phrase' that was repeated in the songs. The court also stopped the sale of film's audio CDs and cassettes containing the two songs as well as the ringtones based on these songs. The judge observed that Sampath had proved 'prima facie that musical work in two songs in Krazzy 4 and their remixes were a copy of the work in the advertisement' for Sony Ericsson. Finally there was a out of court settlement with payment of Rs 2 cr to Ram Sampat pganguli©2014 Law has always been challenged by Technology Law gets amended from time to time to accommodate technology change and societal needs pganguli©2001-2014 Some Landmark US Judgements Diamond v. Chakravarti (in a matter dealing with biotechnology; 447 US 303 [1980]) Diamond v. Diehr (concerning patenting of computer related inventions; 450 US 175, 209 USPQ97 (1981)) State Street Bank & Trust Co v. Signature Financial Group (related to patenting of business methods; 47 USPQ 2d 1596 [Fed. Cir.1998], cert. Denied (US 1999 No. 98-657) Silhoutte International Schmredgesellschaft mbh & Co v. Hartlauer Handelsgesselschaft mbh ( related to parallel imports; 1998 in ECJ) A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001), affirming, 114 F.Supp.2d 896 (N.D. Cal. 2000). Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, 569 U.S. 12-398 (2013) Decision on June 13, 2013 pganguli©1998-2014 Realisable Value of IP to Potential Value of IP Knowledge Economy (E) ~fn [mind (M).concepts (C1 ).commercialisation(C2)] Product Business Life IPR Portfolio Competitive sustenance Management Protection Market acceptability Valuation Marketable Products/Processes Transactions FTO Alignment with market Enforcement Seeking Regulatory Clearances Validity marketable probables Challenges IPR Cliffs Crystallisation to tangibles Responsible Use Proof of concept Ideas Narrowing options Position in the protected To Realisation Knowledge grid (Marketing idea conception Tangibles) time Value maximisation to Business, Markets, Society pganguli©2001-2014 Product Lifecycle Managing IPR Portfolio Monitoring IPR Policing IPR Enforcing IPR OUTPUT INNOVATION PROCESS CONCEPTS Fit in IPR Portfolio Transacting IPR Exploring Tech transfer IPR Landscaping Exploratory Filings/Registrations Strategy for IP Foreign Filings Licensing Options Joint Developments Exploring Tech Transfer Managing Intellectual Property Rights MARKET Record Maintenance & Updating IPR Information pganguli©2001-2014 Beware !!!! pganguli©2001-2014 TODAY in Transition YESTER Times R&D and Business TOMORROW and The Day After Tailoring for tomorrow Co-Production of Upstream Knowledge and Concurrent Transfer thereby Blurring of boundaries and collapsing of timelines for knowledge bridging and integration Search for knowledge tributaries and development of commercialisation distributaries, and /or networking in clusters for optimized use of global knowledge base Intra-Enterprise resources Extra-Enterprise inputs / cross institutional collaborations Organisational frameworks for rapid conversion of ideas to marketables Dynamic equilibrium in working between “For Profit” and “ Not for Profit Institutions” Quantification of Knowledge Ownership and formalised benefit sharing between partners …..IPR Management (creation and transaction) will hold the key Pre-competitive cross industry consortia for cooperation in knowledge creation between competing stake holders with mutual understanding for exclusivity in commercial use. Regulatory frameworks to oversee anticompetitive practices Timely Technical Support In Legal Proceedings INSTITUTIONAL IPR AWARENESS POLICING IPR PORTFOLIO TRACKING COMPETITION IPR monitoring Planning oppositions, blocking moves, etc. Facilitating New Business Institutional IPR Gateway TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER CHECK POST Agreements / Contracts Negotiations / IP Transactions Clearance for use FTO Reports WINDOW TO IPR INFORMATION IN PROJECT TEAMS Research Proposals Identify innovations Appropriate IPR protection Publication clearance GATEWAY Attorneys IPR Authorities National/International agencies pganguli©2001-2014 …...Several Science and Technologies getting orphaned due to non availability of funds to progress IPRs on global scale …….inadequate infrastructure, management skills, negotiation acumen, inadequate venture capital culture ………...No clout to negotiate due to fragmented research approaches ……..lack of patent information base search skills, avoiding of “reinventing the wheel” pganguli©2001-2014 …...What are the safeguards that products of nature are not getting into the IPR domain …….What are the safeguards that standards setting is not getting linked to IPR and private ownerships? ……..Will prices of products and services go up due to IPR protection? ………Will investors put in their money if there is no proper IPR Protection? pganguli©2001-2014 …Social cost of granting wrong patents …….high cost of litigation …………when is traditional knowledge legitimate prior art and under what circumstances should it be considered as socio-piracy? ……..Is the IPR System only for the rich?? pganguli©2001-2014 Are IPR led innovators and Society Non Convergent in thought and deed? pganguli©2001-2014 Are they both going wrong somewhere??? Is a convergence possible????? pganguli©2001-2014 Where there is a will, there is a way!! pganguli©2001-2014 Books and edited volumes in IPR by the Author • • • • • • • • “Gearing up for Patents – The Indian Scenario” P. Ganguli; Universites Press (India) Ltd. Hyderabad, India, (1998) (Associate of Orient Longman) “Intellectual Property Rights … Unleashing the Knowledge Economy” P. Ganguli; Tata McGraw Hill, India (2001) IPR manual titled “Shaping the Future” , P. Ganguli, designed for the Indian Machine Tools Industry… a project sponsored by UNIDO and jointly worked with WIPO was released as a joint publication of UNIDO-WIPO-IMTMA in August 2005 Guest editor, P. Ganguli, of the September 2005 Special Issue on “Technology Transfer with IPR” of the Journal of Intellectual Property Rights published by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India Co-edited a volume titled “Technology Transfer issues in Biotechnology”, P. Ganguli, Dr Ben Prickril (France) and Dr Rita Khanna(USA) published by Wiley-VCH(Germany) in 2009 “Geographical Indications……its evolving contours” was released on the internet for free download from www.iips.ac.in on July 18, 2009 “Nanotechnology Intellectual Property Rights….Research, Design, and Commercialization”, P. Ganguli and S.Jabade, CRC Press (Francis and Taylor Group), USA, June 2012 Notice • All the slides in this presentation are original works of the author during the period 1998 to 2014 • The copyright to these slides belong to the author • These slides may be used for educational purposes with proper reference to the author and details provided in the title slide of this presentation • Any other uses of these slides than what is indicated should be done only with the prior permission of the author. Professor Prabuddha Ganguli prabuddha.ganguli@gmaiil.com pgang@mtnl.net.in Mumbai, India, 28.07.2014