Review of IC Fabrication Technology MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY A Review of IC Fabrication Technology Dr. Lynn Fuller Webpage: http://people.rit.edu/lffeee Microelectronic Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology 82 Lomb Memorial Drive Rochester, NY 14623-5604 Tel (585) 475-2035 Email: Lynn.Fuller@rit.edu Department webpage: http://www.microe.rit.edu Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor 7-7-2014 Review.ppt Page 1 Review of IC Fabrication Technology ADOBE PRESENTER This PowerPoint module has been published using Adobe Presenter. Please click on the Notes tab in the left panel to read the instructors comments for each slide. Manually advance the slide by clicking on the play arrow or pressing the page down key. Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 2 Review of IC Fabrication Technology OUTLINE § § § § § § § § § § § Constants Periodic Table Material Properties Oxide Growth Diffusion Resistivity, Sheet Resistance, Resistance Mobility pn Junction MOSFET Vt Ion Implantation Conclusion Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 3 Review of IC Fabrication Technology CONSTANTS Electronic charge Speed of light in vacuum Permittivity of vacuum Free electron Mass Planck constant Boltzmann constant Avogadro’s number Thermal voltage q c o mo h k Ao kT/q 1.602 E -19 Coulomb 2.998E8 m/s 8.854 E -14 F/cm 9.11E-31 Kg 6.625E-34 J s 1.38 E-23 J /°K = 8.625E-5 eV/°K 6.022E23 molecules/gm- mole @ 300 °K = 0.02586 PLAY Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 4 Review of IC Fabrication Technology 1 PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS 1.0079 2 He H 0.1787 Helium 0.0899 Hydrogen 3 6.914 4 Be 0.53 Lithium 1.85 Beryllium 1122.9898 12 Density g/cm3 24.305 Na Mg 0.97 Sodium 1.74 Magnesium 47.90 K Ca Sc Ti 0.86 Potassium 1.55 Calcium 3.0 Scandium 4.50 Titanium 38 87.62 39 88.906 40 91.22 Sr Y Zr 1.53 Rubidium 2.8 Strontium 4.5 Yttrium 6.49 Zirconium 132.90 56 137.33 57 138.906 58 23 50.941 24 V Rb 55 14 20.086 Si Cr 7.19 5.8 Vanadium Chromium 41 92.906 Nb 178.49 51.996 42 95.94 25 54.938 180.95 183.85 27 58.9332 28 29 63.546 30 65.238 14.0067 8 15.9994 9 18.9984 10 20.179 B C N O F Ne 2.34 Boron 2.62 Carbon 1.251 Nitrogen 1.429 Oxygen 1.696 Fluorine 0.901 Neon 13 58.70 7 12.011 26.9815 14 20.086 15 30.97376 16 32.06 17 35.453 18 39.948 Al Si P S Cl Ar 2.70 Aluminum 2.33 Silicon 1.82 Phosphorous 2.07 Sulfur 3.17 Clorine 1.784 Argon 31 69.72 32 72.59 33 74.9216 34 78.96 35 79.904 36 83.80 Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr 7.43 Manganese 7.86 Iron 8.90 Selenium 8.90 Nickel 8.96 Copper 7.14 Zinc 5.98 Gallium 5.32 Germanium 5.72 Arsenic 4.80 Selenium 3.12 Bromine 3.74 Krypton 43 Mo 60 55.847 6 10.81 Mn 98 Tc 8.55 10.2 11.5 Niobium Molybdenum Technetium 59 26 5 Name 2.33 Silicon 19 39.0983 20 40.08 21 44.9559 22 85.468 Atomic Weight Symbol Atomic Number 9.01218 Li 37 4.0026 61 186.207 44 101.07 45 102.9055 46 47 106.4 107.868 48 112.41 49 114.82 50 118.69 51 121.75 26 55.847 26 127.60 54 131.30 Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te Fe Xe 12.2 Rhodium 12.4 Rhodium 12.0 Palladium 10.5 Silver 8.65 Cadmium 7.31 Indium 7.30 Tin 6.68 Antimony 6.24 Tellurium 7.86 Tellurium 5.89 Xenon 76 77 78 84 85 190.2 192.22 195.09 79 196.9665 80 200.59 81 204.37 82 207.2 83 206.980 209 210 86 222 Cs Ba La Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Tl Pb Bi Po At Rn 1.87 Cesium 3.5 Barium 6.7 Lanthanum 13.1 Hafnium 16.6 Tantalum 19.3 Tungstem 21.0 Rhenium 22.4 Osmium 27.16 Iridium 21.4 IPlatinum 19.3 Gold 13.53 Mercury 11.85 Thallium 11.4 Lead 9.8 Bismuth 9.4 Polonium ??? Astatine 9.91 Radon 89 104 261 105 262 106 263 87 223 88 226.02 Fr Ra ??? Francium 5 Radium 227.02 Ac PLAY Unq Unp Unh 10.07 ???? Unnilpentium ???? Actinium Unnilquadium Unnilhexium 58 140.12 59 140.91 60 Ce Pr 144.24 Nd 61 145 Pm 62 150.4 63 151.96 64 157.25 Sm 6.78 6.77 7.00 6.475 7.54 Cerium PraseoymiumNeodymium Promethium Samarium 90 232.0 Th 91 231 92 238.02 Pa U 93 237 Np 11.7 15.4 18.90 20.4 Rochester Institute of Technology Thorium Protactinium Uranium Neptunium Microelectronic Engineering 94 237 Eu Gd 5.26 7.89 Europium Gadolinium 95 243 96 247 65 158.92 66 162.5 67 164.93 68 167.26 69 169.93 70 173.04 71 174.97 Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu 8.27 Terbium 8.54 Dysprosium 8.90 Holmium 9.06 Erbium 9.33 Thulium 6.98 Ytterbium 9.84 Lutetium 97 247 98 251 99 252 Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es 19.8 13.6 PlutoniumAmericium 13.511 Curium ???? Berkelium ???? Californium ???? Einsteinium © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor 100 257 101 Fm 258 Md ???? ???? Fermiumr Mendelevium Page 5 102 259 103 260 No Lr ???? Nobelium ???? Lawrencium Review of IC Fabrication Technology MATERIAL PROPERTIES Symbol Atoms per unit cell Atomic Number Atomic weight Lattice constant Atomic density Density Energy Gap 300°K Relative permittivity Index of refraction Melting point Specific heat Thermal diffusivity Coefficient expansion Intrinsic carrier conc Electron Mobility Hole Mobility Density of States conduction Density of States valance Breakdown Electric Field Effective mass electron Effective mass hole Electron affinity Z MW ao No d Eg r n Tm Cp K Dth ni µn µp Nc Nv E mn*/mo mp*/mo qX Units g/g-mole nm cm-3 g cm-3 eV °C J (gK)-1 w(cmK)-1 K-1 cm-3 cm2/Vs cm2/Vs cm-3 cm-3 V/cm eV Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering Si 8 14 28.09 0.54307 5.00E22 2.328 1.124 11.7 3.44 1412 0.70 0.87 2.5E-6 1.45E10 1417 471 2.8E19 1.04E19 3E5 1.08 0.81 4.05 Ge 8 32 72.59 0.56575 4.42E22 5.323 0.67 16.0 3.97 937 0.32 0.36 5.7E-6 2.4E13 3900 1900 1.04E19 6.0E18 8E4 0.55 0.3 4.00 GaAs 8 31/33 144.64 0.56532 2.21E22 5.316 1.42 13.1 3.3 1237 0.35 0.44 5.9E-6 9.0E6 8800 400 4.7E17 7.0E18 3.5E5 0.068 0.5 4.07 GaP 8 31/15 100.70 0.54505 2.47E22 4.13 2.24 10.2 3.3 1467 SiO2 Si3N4 14/8 60.08 14/7 140.28 0.775 1.48E22 3.44 4.7 7.5 2.0 0.004 5.3E-6 2.20E22 2.19 8~9 3.9 1.46 1700 1.4 0.32 5E-6 300 100 20 10E-8 6~9E6 0.5 0.5 4.3 1.0 From Muller and Kamins © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 6 0.17 2.8E-6 Review of IC Fabrication Technology OXIDE GROWTH Oxide Thickness Xox 0.46 Xox Original Silicon Surface Silicon Consumed Dry oxide O2 only Wet oxide O2 bubbled through water Steam burn H2 in O2 to make H20 (steam) Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor PLAY Page 7 Review of IC Fabrication Technology WET OXIDE GROWTH CHART 10 1 Xox ,(um) 10-1 10-2 1 10 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering t, Time, (min) 100 PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 8 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DRY OXIDE GROWTH CHART 10 1 xox ,(um) 10-1 10-2 10 100 1,000 t, Time, (min) Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor PLAY Page 9 Review of IC Fabrication Technology OXIDE GROWTH CALCULATOR OXIDE.XLS Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 10 Review of IC Fabrication Technology EXAMPLES 1. Estimate the oxide thickness resulting from 50 min. soak at 1100 °C in wet oxygen. 2. If 1000 Å of oxide exists to start with, what is resulting oxide thickness after an additional 50 min. soak at 1100 °C in dry oxygen. Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 11 Review of IC Fabrication Technology OXIDE THICKNESS COLOR CHART Thickness 500Å 700 1000 1200 1500 1700 2000 2200 2500 2700 3000 3100 3200 3400 3500 3600 3700 3900 4100 4200 4400 4600 4700 Color Tan Brown Dark Violet - Red Violet Royal Blue Blue Light Blue - Metallic Blue Metallic - very light Yellow Green LIght Gold or Yellow - Slightly Metallic Gold with slight Yellow Orange Orange - Melon Red Violet Blue - Violet Blue Blue Blue Blue - Blue Green Light Green Green - Yellow Green Yellow Green Yellow Light Orange Carnation Pink Violet Red Red Violet Violet Blue Violet Thickness 4900 5000 5200 5400 5600 5700 5800 6000 6300 6800 7200 7700 8000 8200 8500 8600 8700 8900 9200 9500 9700 9900 10000 Color Blue Blue Blue Green Green Yellow Green GreenYellow Yellow -"Yellowish"(at times appears to be Lt gray or matellic) Light Orange or Yellow - Pink Carnation Pink Violet Red "Bluish"(appears violet red, Blue Green, looks grayish) Blue Blue Blue Green - Green "Yellowish" Orange Salmon Dull, LIght Red Violet Violet Blue Violet Blue Blue Blue Blue Green Dull Yellow Green Yellow - "Yellowish" Orange Carnation Pink Nitride Thickness = (Oxide Thickness)(Oxide Index/Nitride Index) Eg. Yellow Nitride Thickness = (2000)(1.46/2.00) = 1460 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering Blue PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 12 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION FROM A CONSTANT SOURCE PLAY STOP N(x,t) = No erfc (x/2 Dt ) N(x,t) Solid Solubility Limit, No p-type n-type Wafer Background Concentration, NBC Xj Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 13 x into wafer Review of IC Fabrication Technology Concentration/Surface Concentration = N/No ERFC FUNCTION 10-0 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 0.0 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 14 = x / 4Dt Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION CONSTANTS AND SOLID SOLUBILITY DIFFUSION CONSTANTS BORON TEMP DRIVE-IN 900 °C 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1.07E-15 cm2/s 4.32E-15 1.57E-14 5.15E-14 1.55E-13 4.34E-13 1.13E-12 2.76E-12 PHOSPHOROUS PHOSPHOROUS PRE 2.09e-14 cm2/s 6.11E-14 1.65E-13 4.11E-13 9.61E-13 2.12E-12 4.42E-12 8.78E-12 BORON PHOSPHOROUS DRIVE-IN SOLID SOLUBILITY NOB 7.49E-16 cm2/s 4.75E20 cm-3 3.29E-15 4.65E20 1.28E-14 4.825E20 4.52E-14 5.000E20 1.46E-13 5.175E20 4.31E-13 5.350E20 1.19E-12 5.525E20 3.65E-12 5.700E20 PLAY Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 15 SOLID SOLUBILITY NOP 6.75E20 cm-3 7.97E20 9.200E20 1.043E21 1.165E21 1.288E21 1.410E21 1.533E21 Review of IC Fabrication Technology TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF DIFFUSION CONSTANTS PLAY Temperature Dependence: D = D0 Exp (-EA/kT) cm2/sec Boron D0 = 0.76 EA = 3.46 k = 8.625E-5 eV/°K T in Kelvins Phosphorous D0 = 3.85 EA = 3.66 Temperature Dependence of the Solid Solubility of Boron and Phosphorous in Silicon NOB = 3.5E17T + 1.325E20 cm-3 NOP = 2.45E18T - 1.53E21 cm-3 T in Celsius T in Celsius Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 16 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION FROM A LIMITED SOURCE N(x,t) = Q’A(tp) Exp (- x2/4Dt) Dt for erfc predeposit Q’A (tp) = QA(tp)/Area = 2 No PLAY for ion implant predeposit Q’A(tp) = Dose PLAY (Dptp) / Dose Where D is the diffusion constant at the drive in temperature and t is the drive in diffusion time, Dp is the diffusion constant at the predeposit temperature and tp is the predeposit time Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 17 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION MASKING CALCULATOR Select Boron or Phosphorous Enter Temperature and Time Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering From: Hamilton and Howard © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 18 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION MASKING Phosphorous Masking Boron Masking From: Hamilton and Howard Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 19 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION AND DRIVE IN CALCULATIONS DIFFUSION.XLS Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 20 Review of IC Fabrication Technology DIFFUSION FROM A LIMITED SOURCE GIVEN Starting Wafer Resistivity Starting Wafer Type VALUE Rho = n-type = 1 p-type = 1 Pre Deposition Ion Implant Dose UNITS 10 ohm-cm 1 1 or 0 0 1 or 0 4.00E+15 ions/cm2 Drive-in Temperature Drive-in Time 1000 °C 360 min CALCULATE Diffusion Constant at Temperature of Drive-in VALUE UNITS 1.43E-14 cm/sec CALCULATION OF DIFFUSION CONSTANTS IonImplt.xls D0 (cm2/s) EA (eV) 0.76 3.46 3.85 3.66 Boron Phosphorous CALCULATIONS Substrate Doping = 1 / (q µmax Rho) VALUE UNITS 4.42E+14 cm-3 RESULTS Pre deposition Dose xj after drive-in = ((4 Dd td/QA) ln (Nsub (Ddtd)^0.5))^0.5 average doping Nave = Dose/xj mobility (µ) at Doping equal to Nave Sheet Resistance = 1/(q (µ(Nave))Dose) Surface Concentration = Dose/ (pDt)^0.5 VALUE 4.00E+15 1.25 3.21E+19 57 27.6 1.28E+20 UNITS atoms/cm2 µm atoms/cm3 cm2/V-s ohms cm-3 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 21 Review of IC Fabrication Technology EXAMPLE 1. A predeposit from a p-type spin-on dopant into a 1E15 cm-3 wafer is done at 1100°C for 10 min. Calculate the resulting junction depth and dose. 2. The spin-on dopant is removed and the Boron is driven in for 2 hours at 1100 °C. What is the new junction depth? Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 22 Review of IC Fabrication Technology RESISTANCE, RESISTIVITY, SHEET RESISTANCE Resistance = R = L/Area = s L/w Resistivity = 1/( qµnn + qµpp) ohms PLAY ohm-cm Sheet Resistance s = 1/ ( q µ(N) N(x) dx) ~ 1/( qµ Dose) ohms/square PLAY s = / t I q = 1.6E-19 coul L slope = 1/R Area w t V R Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 23 Review of IC Fabrication Technology CALCULATION OF CARRIER CONCENTRATIONS B h o r ni Nc/T^3/2 Nv/T^3/2 1.11E+03 6.63E-34 Jsec 8.85E-14 F/cm 11.7 1.45E+10 cm-3 5.43E+15 2.02E+15 Nd = Ed= Na = Ea= Temp= 3.00E+16 0.049 8.00E+15 0.045 cm-3 eV below Ec cm-3 eV above Ev Donor Concentration Acceptor Concentration 300 °K Donor and Acceptor Levels (eV above or below Ev or Ec) Boron 0.044 Phosphorous 0.045 Arsenic 0.049 carrier_conc.xls CALCULATIONS: (this program makes a guess at the value of the fermi level and trys to minimize the charge balance) KT/q 0.026 Volts Eg=Ego-(aT^2/(T+B)) 1.115 eV Nc 2.82E+19 cm-3 Nv 1.34E+01 cm-3 Fermi Level, Ef 0.9295 eV above Ev free electrons, n = Nc exp(-q(Ec-Ef)KT) 2.17E+16 cm-3 Ionized donors, Nd+ = Nd*(1+2*exp(q(Ef-Ed)/KT))^(-1) 2.97E+16 cm-3 holes, p = Nv exp(-q(Ef-Ev)KT) 3.43E-15 cm-3 Ionized acceptors, Na- = Na*(1+2*exp(q(Ea-Ef)/KT))^(-1) 8.00E+15 cm-3 Charge Balance = p + Nd+ - n - Na3.22E+12 cm-3 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering Click on Button to do Calculation Button Button © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 24 Review of IC Fabrication Technology RESISTIVITY OF SILICON VS DOPING Impurity Concentration, N, cm-3 1021 1/(qµ(N)N) 1020 1019 Because µ is a function of N and N is the doping, the relationship between resistivity and N is given in the figure shown, or calculated from equations for µ(N) 1018 Boron 1017 1016 1015 Phosphorous 1014 1013 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 101 102 103 104 PLAY Resistivity, ohm-cm © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 25 Review of IC Fabrication Technology PLAY electrons 20 10 ^ 19 10 ^ 18 10 ^ 17 10 ^ 16 10 ^ 15 10 ^ 14 holes 10 ^ 13 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 10 ^ Mobility (cm2/ V sec) ELECTRON AND HOLE MOBILITY Electron and hole mobilities in silicon at 300 K as Arsenic functions of the total dopant Boron Phosphorus concentration (N). The values plotted are the results of the curve fitting measurements from several sources. The mobility curves can be generated using the equation below with the parameters shown: Total Impurity Concentration (cm-3) (µmax-µmin) PLAY µ(N) = µ mi+ {1 + (N/Nref)} Institute of Technology FromRochester Muller and Kamins, 3rd Ed., pg 33 Microelectronic Engineering Parameter µmin µmax Nref © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Arsenic 52.2 1417 9.68X10^16 0.680 Page 26 Phosphorous 68.5 1414 9.20X10^16 0.711 Boron 44.9 470.5 2.23X10^17 0.719 Review of IC Fabrication Technology TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON MOBILITY Derived empirically for silicon for T in K between 250 and 500 °K and for N (total dopant concentration) up to 1 E20 cm-3 µn (T,N) = 88 Tn-0.57 + 1250 Tn-2.33 1 + [ N / (1.26E17 Tn 2.4)] ^0.88 Tn -0.146 PLAY µp (T,N) = 54.3 Tn-0.57 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 407 Tn-2.33 + 1 + [ N / (2.35E17 Tn 2.4)]^ 0.88 Tn -0.146 Where Tn = T/300 From Muller and Kamins, 3rd Ed., pg 33 © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 27 Review of IC Fabrication Technology EXCELL WORKSHEET TO CALCULATE MOBILITY MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 3/13/2005 CALCULATION OF MOBILITY Dr. Lynn Fuller To use this spreadsheed change the values in the white boxes. The rest of the sheet is protected and should not be changed unless you are sure of the consequences. The calculated results are shown in the purple boxes. CONSTANTS Tn = T/300 = 1.22 VARIABLES Temp= N total 365 °K 1.00E+18 cm-3 n-type p-type <100> CHOICES 1=yes, 0=no 1 0 Kamins, Muller and Chan; 3rd Ed., 2003, pg 33 mobility= Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 163 cm2/(V-sec) mobility.xls © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 28 Review of IC Fabrication Technology EXCELL WORKSHEET TO CALCULATE RESISTANCE Resistors_Poly.xls Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 29 Review of IC Fabrication Technology UNIFORMLY DOPED PN JUNCTION P+ Phosphrous donor atom and electron P+ Ionized Immobile Phosphrous donor atom BB- Ionized Immobile Boron acceptor atom + Space Charge Layer n = ND p = NA B- + B- + B- p-type Boron acceptor atom and hole B- B- charge density, qNA W1 =qND W2 P+ P+ P+ P+ P+ P+ P+ P+ P+ +VR n-type +qND -W1 x W2 -qNA Electric Field, Potential, Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor +VR Page 30 Review of IC Fabrication Technology UNIFORMLY DOPED PN JUNCTION Built in Voltage: = KT/q ln (NA ND /ni2) ni = 1.45E10 cm-3 Width of Space Charge Layer, W: with reverse bias of VR volts WW1W2= [ (2q+VR) (1/NA 1/ND)]1/2 W1 width on p-side W1= W [ND/(NA ND)] W2 width on n-side W2= W [NA/(NA ND)] Maximum Electric Field: = - [(2q/+VR) (NA ND/(NA ND))]1/2 Junction Capacitance per unit area: Cj’rW= r[(2q+VR) (1/NA 1/ND)]1/2 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering o r = 8.85E-12 (11.7) F/m = 8.85E-14 (11.7) F/cm © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 31 Review of IC Fabrication Technology EXAMPLE Example: If the doping concentrations are Na=1E15 and Nd=3E15 cm-3 and the reverse bias voltage is 0, then find the built in voltage, width of the space charge layer, width on the n-side, width on the pside, electric field maximum and junction capacitance. Repeat for reverse bias of 10, 40, and 100 volts. = Vbi = KT/q ln (NA ND /ni2) = WW1W2= [ (2/q) (+VR) (1/NA 1/ND)]1/2 = W1 = W2 = Emax = Cj = Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 32 Review of IC Fabrication Technology EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS PN.XLS Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 33 Review of IC Fabrication Technology LONG CHANNEL THRESHOLD VOLTAGE, VT Xox Flat-band Voltage VFB = ms - Qss C’ox p-type substrate (n-channel) Bulk Potential : Work Function: Difference p = -KT/q 1 X (x) dx C’ox 0 Xox n-type substrate (p-channel) Qss = q Nss n = +KT/q ln (NA /ni) M S = M - ( X + Eg/2q + [p]) M S = M Maximum Depletion Width: (Wdmax) 4 s[p] qNa Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering - ( X + Eg/2q - [n]) 4 s[n] qNd Threshold Voltage: VT = VFB + 2 [p] + 1 p-type substrate C’ox Threshold Voltage: VT = VFB - 2 [n] n-type substrate ln (ND /ni) 1 C’ox 2 s q Na ( 2[p]) 2 s q Nd ( 2[n]) PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 34 Review of IC Fabrication Technology LONG CHANNEL Vt Gate work function, n+, p+, aluminum Substrate doping, Nd or Na Oxide thickness, Xox Surface State Density, Nss or Qss also Substrate to Source voltage difference Threshold Voltage +3 +4 650Å +2 +3 250Å +1 +2 150Å 0 PLAY +1 -1 n+ poly gate left scale p+ poly gate right scale -2 Qf = 0 Vbs = 0 -3 implant dose = zero Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 150Å 250Å 650Å 1014 1015 1016 1017 Substrate doping, Nd or Na © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 35 0 -1 -2 Review of IC Fabrication Technology VT ADJUST IMPLANT Assume that the total implant is shallow (within Wdmax) +/- Vt = q Dose*/Cox’ where Dose* is the dose that is added to the Si Cox’ is gate oxide capacitance/cm2 Boron gives + shift Cox’ = or / Xox Phosphorous gives - shift Example: To shift +1.0 volts implant Boron through 1000 Å Kooi oxide at an energy to place the peak of the implant at the oxide/silicon interface. Use a Dose = Vt Cox’/q =(1.0)(3.9)(8.85E-14)/(1.6E-16)=2.16E11 ions/cm2 but multiply by 2 since 1/2 goes into silicon Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 36 Review of IC Fabrication Technology MOSFET THRESHOLD VOLTAGE CALCULATION MOSFETVT.XLS Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 37 Review of IC Fabrication Technology ION IMPLANT EQUATIONS Gaussian Implant Profile N’ -(X-Rp)2 N(x) = exp [ ] 2Rp 2Rp2 Rp = Range Rp = Straggle N’ = Dose = } From Curves I mqA dt concentration cm-3 after implant after anneal at 950 C, 15 min Ni Approximation used in Vt calculations After Anneal x N’ -(X-Rp)2 N(x) = 2Rp2 + 2Dt exp [ 2(Rp2+Dt) ] xi where D is diffusion constant at the anneal temperature t is time of anneal Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 38 Approximation N’ = Ni xi Review of IC Fabrication Technology ION IMPLANT RANGE Projected Range, Rp ,(um) 1 As 10-1 B P Sb 10-2 10 100 Implantation Energy (KeV) Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor 1,000 PLAY Page 39 Review of IC Fabrication Technology Standard Deviation, Rp ,(um) ION IMPLANT STANDARD DEVIATION 0.1 B 0.01 P As Sb 0.001 10 Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 100 Implantation Energy (KeV) © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor 1,000 PLAY Page 40 Review of IC Fabrication Technology ION IMPLANT MASKING CALCULATOR Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering 11/20/2004 IMPLANT MASK CALCULATOR DOPANT SPECIES B11 1 BF2 0 P31 0 Lance Barron Dr. Lynn Fuller Enter 1 - Yes MASK TYPE Resist Poly Oxide Nitride 0 1 0 0 Thickness to Mask >1E15/cm3 Surface Concentration 0 - No in white boxes ENERGY 60 KeV 4073.011 Angstroms This calculator is based on Silvaco Suprem simulations using the Dual Pearson model. In powerpoint click on spread sheet to change settings for a new calculation Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Lance Baron, Fall 2004 Page 41 Review of IC Fabrication Technology REFERENCES 1. Basic Integrated Circuit Engineering, Douglas J. Hamilton, William G. Howard, McGraw Hill Book Co., 1975. 2. Micro Electronics Processing and Device Design, Roy a. Colclaser, John Wiley & Sons., 1980. 3. Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, Richard S. Muller, Theodore I. Kamins, Mansun Chan, John Wiley & Sons.,3rd Ed., 2003. 4. VLSI Technology, Edited by S.M. Sze, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1983. 5. Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Vol. 1., Stanley Wolf, Richard Tauber, Lattice Press, 1986. 6. The Science and Engineering of Microelectronic Fabrication, Stephen A. Campbell, Oxford University Press, 1996. Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 42 Review of IC Fabrication Technology HOMEWORK - REVIEW OF IC TECHNOLOGY 1. If a window is etched in 5000 Å of oxide and the wafer is oxidized again for 50 min in wet O2 at 1050 °C what is the new thickness (where it was 5000 Å), the thickness in the etch window, and the step height in the silicon if all the oxide is etched off the wafer. Draw a picture showing original Si surface. 2. A Boron diffusion is done into 5 ohm-cm n-type wafer involving two steps. First a short predeposit at 950 C for 30 min., followed by removal of the diffusion source and a drive in at 1100 C for 2 hours. Calculate the junction depth and the sheet resistance of the diffused layers. Estimate the oxide thickness needed to mask this diffusion. 3. For a pn junction with the p side doping of 1E17 and the n side at 1E15 calculate, width of space charge layer, width on p side, on n side, capacitance per unit area, max electric field. 4. Calculate the threshold voltage for an aluminum gate PMOSFET fabricated on an n-type wafer with doping of 5E15, a surface state density of 7E10, and gate oxide thickness of 150 Å. What is the threshold voltage if the surface state density is 3E11? 5. Calculate the ion implant dose needed to shift the threshold voltage found in the problem above to -1 Volts. Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering PLAY © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 43 Review of IC Fabrication Technology HOMEWORK - EXACT CALCULATION OF SHEET RESISTANCE FOR A DIFFUSED LAYER 1. A Boron p-type layer is diffused into an n-type silicon wafer (1E15 cm-3) at 1100 °C for 1 hour. Calculate the exact value of the sheet resistance and compare to the approximate value. Sheet Resistance s = 1/ ( q µ(N) N(x) dx) ~ 1/( qµ Dose) ohms/square (µmax-µmin) µ(N) = µ min + } {1 + (N/N ) ref for Boron µmin µmax Nref 44.9 470.5 2.23X10^17 0.719 Let Q’A(tp) = 5.633E15 cm-2 D= 1.55E-13 cm2/s t = 1 hour N(x,t) = Q’A(tp) Exp (- x2/4Dt) Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Dt Page 44 Review of IC Fabrication Technology HW SOLUTION - EXACT CALCULATION OF SHEET RESISTANCE FOR A DIFFUSED LAYER Divide the diffused layer up into 100 slices and for each slice find the doping and exact mobility. Calculate the sheet resistance from the reciprocal of the sum of the conductance of each slice. N(x) NBC x xj Rochester Institute of Technology Microelectronic Engineering © July 7, 2014 Dr. Lynn Fuller, Professor Page 45