March 2-4, 2016
Salt Palace Convention Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
TRACK: C (AIRSIDE/
WORKSHOP: 5
ENGINEERING)
Title: Sustainability Improvements – Airfield
Electrical and Lighting Update
Moderator: David Kipp, P.E., Burns Engineering
Date: March 3, 2016
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Palace Convention Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
Title: Sustainability Improvements – Airfield
Electrical and Lighting Update
Speaker: Chuck Dennie, Burns Engineering
Date: March 3, 2016
MISSION STATEMENT
ACRP 09-09 : LED Airfield Lighting System Operation
and Maintenance
– To prepare a guidebook for airports nationwide, describing
best operating and maintenance practices for LED airfield
ground lighting systems. Include a discussion of issues to be
considered during design, construction and maintenance.
PRESENTATION AGENDA
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
LED timeline
Data collection process
LED lighting management
Warranty considerations
Fixture obsolescence and spare parts
Preventative maintenance and refurbishment
Return on investment
Environmental impacts on lighting systems
Takeaways
TIMELINE OF LED AIRFIELD
GROUND LIGHTING
48W
15W
PROJECT APPROACH
•
Analyze previously published research, reach
out to vendors and review FAA Advisory
Circulars
•
Gather basic usage data via a survey
questionnaire distributed to 49 airports
nationwide
•
In-depth investigation via case studies
selected based on survey response, 12
airports selected
•
Synthesize research into best practices
guidebook
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE – 44
AIRPORTS
CASE STUDIES – 12 AIRPORTS
LED LIGHTING MANAGEMENT
• Identify airfield ground lighting as an
asset
• Shift in maintenance philosophy
• Establish repeatable and recordable
maintenance procedures
WARRANTY CONSIDERATIONS
• Engineering Brief 67D
4.0 Minimum Warranties
4.1 – All LED light fixtures with the exception of obstruction lighting (AC
150/5345-43) must be warranted by the manufacturer for a minimum of 4
years after date of installation inclusive of all electronics.
• Fixtures under warranty sent to manufacturer for
repair
• Post warranty options:
– Extended warranty
– Service contract
– In-house repair
• Maintenance plan must allow for post warranty option
FIXTURE OBSOLESCENCE AND
SPARE PARTS
•
•
•
•
LED fixtures and components
continue to evolve as the LED
arena widens
Vendors try to standardize but
some components eventually can
no longer supported
Use maintenance practices as
guide on spare parts (whole
fixtures vs. individual components)
Develop strategy for replacement
or upkeep of unsupported fixtures
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND
REFURBISHMENT
•
•
•
•
•
•
Preventative maintenance is NOT
synonymous with system repairs
Proper training of maintenance
personnel is key
Asset management programs can
track installation date, spare stock and
warranty expiration
Refurbishment is critical with longer
life LEDs – prisms, gaskets, housing
Consult and work closely with vendors
Develop a plan to achieve
requirements of FAA AC 150/534026C – Maintenance of Airport Visual
Aid Facilities
FAA ADVISORY CIRCULAR 150/5340-26C
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
• Cost greatest barrier to
widespread adoption
• LED lighting comprises
between 20% - 50% of all
airfield lighting
• Understanding ROI of LED
vs. non-LED
– LED higher initial investment
– Non-LED higher operational
costs
ROI FACTORS
• Energy cost
– Varies from region to region
• Maintenance cost
– Significant issue impacting ROI
•
•
•
•
Fixture cost
Refurbishment cost
Fixture damage rates
MTTF
Energy Cost, 4.2
Material Cost,
24.8
Lamp
Replacement
Labor Cost, 71
MEAN TIME TO FAILURE (MTTF)
Acceptance must shift to fixture performance
Factors
Lamp Life
Photometric
Output dips
below 70%.
LED
Incandescent
Average LED life of 56,000
hours under high-intensity
conditions and more than
150,000 hours under typical
operating conditions.
Low-energy/long-life halogen
lamps are 48W with a rated
life of 1,500 hours at 6.6A
and in excess of 6,000 hours
in practical use.
Approximately the life of the
fixture.
Photometric Intensity of the
Quartz lamp may drop below
70% at 50% of the life of the
lamp.
Deterioration of
Subject to deterioration is the
Optical Lens and Subject to deterioration is the
same for either type of
Environmental same for either type of fixture.
fixture.
Factors
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Vibration
Moisture
Heat
Cold
Insects
Sand
Glycol
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
• Vibration
– Higher incident of failure
of T/W CL fixtures at high
speed exits
– Complex forces placed on
in-pavement fixtures
– May have an affect on
bolts
– Difficult to pinpoint effect
excessive vibration has
on fixture components
Empty operating weight: 353,000 lbs.
Max landing weight: 524,000 lbs.
Max takeoff weight: 660,000 lbs.
Max fuel capacity: 45,000 US gals.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
• Vibration
– Higher incident of failure
of T/W CL fixtures at high
speed exits
– Complex forces placed on
in-pavement fixtures
– May have an affect on
bolts
– Difficult to pinpoint effect
excessive vibration has
on fixture components
Empty operating weight: 353,000 lbs.
Max landing weight: 524,000 lbs.
Max takeoff weight: 660,000 lbs.
Max fuel capacity: 45,000 US gals.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
• Moisture
– Most common issue
airports are reporting with
LED lights
– Many airports have
constant presence of water
in their lighting systems
– Older LED fixtures were
susceptible to electrical
shorts on the circuit boards
– Lights seem to be
refurbished less often due
to longer life of light source
PARTING THOUGHTS
• Go get the guidebook
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/online
pubs/acrp/acrp_rpt_148.pdf
• Many other topics such as
signs, monitoring, circuit
configuration and heaters
• Topics consider all sizes
and types of airports
• LED lighting technology, is
forcing a shift from
traditional maintenance
methods
Acknowledgements
…and all airports who completed the survey!
Contact
Chuck Dennie, PE
• cdennie@burns-group.com
• D: (215) 979-7700 Ext. 7762
• C: (302) 540-4912
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Palace Convention Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
Title: Sustainability Improvements: Airfield
Electrical and Lighting Update
Speaker: Stephen Major, ADB Airfield Solutions
Date: March 3, 2016
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Asset Management
for Airfields
Stephen Major
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
“Successful businesses understand that the optimized management of
their assets is vital to operational performance and profitability”
Asset Management
Topics
for Airfields
•
•
•
•
Why, What, Who and How of Asset Management
Asset Management Standards and Systems
Factors Shaping AGL Maintenance
Asset Management Application
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Why, What, Who and How
of Asset Management
Why Asset Management for Airports?
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Make better investment
decisions
Full visibility across all
operational silos with
Integrated Data and
Financial Analysis
Align all Stakeholders to
a common purpose
Asset Management
Policies, Strategies and
Plans
Extend Asset Life, Reduce
Downtime, Better
Control over Performance
Finding the Optimal
Maintenance and
Economic Strategy
Respond Easier to
Changes in Regulations
and Commercial
Environment
Move from Reactive to
Proactive Decision
Making
ACRP Report 69, Transportation Research Board, Sponsored by FAA
Better Value
for your Money
Examples:
• 13.5%
increase in
pavement life
• Pavement
levels of
service
maintained
with 30%
reduction in
budget
What Asset Management is…
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
• A New Way of Thinking – Lifecycle
• Integration of Multiple
Information Systems
•
•
•
•
Computerized
Maintenance
Management System
(CMMS)
Enterprise Asset
Management System
(EAMS)
Computer Aided Facility
Management (CAFM)
Geographic Information
System (GIS)
New Asset
Decommission
Who will benefit from Asset Management?
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
All
Stakeholders
CEO and
Board
Better understanding of future needs to service customers
competitively…Better executive decisions
Budget and
Finance
Reduce unforeseen post-budget capital needs; 10 year and
beyond forecast of capital, operations, and maintenance
needs
Planning
Manager
Planning requirements for infrastructure and assets included
in airport asset management plans
Design &
Engineering
Manager
Greater lead time on project work load, processes for
continuous improvement in design\construction standards,
improved engineering records and data management
Operations
Manager
Support for and focus on achieving operating efficiency and
effectiveness, and service level outcomes
Maintenance
Manager
Increased support for improved maintenance processes and
practices. Input into investment and design decisions.
Environmental
Manager
Awareness of the environmental consequences of
infrastructure failures and ability to pre-plan mitigations
Information
Technology
Greater awareness and understanding of the specific system
functionalities needed to support the business
ACRP Report 69, Transportation Research Board, Sponsored by FAA
How to Develop an Asset Management Plan
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
10 Step Process to Asset Management … Answers 5 Core Questions
1. What is the current state of
my assets?
2. What is my required Level
of Service?
1
2
Asset
Performance
and Failure
Modes
3
6 Determine
Business Risk
(Criticality)
7
Optimize
Operations &
Maintenance
Investment
8
Develop
Asset Registry
3. What assets are
critical to sustained
performance?
Determine
Residual Life
Optimize
Capital
Investment
4 Determine
Life Cycle &
Replacement
Costs
9 Determine
Funding
Strategy
4. What are my best O&M
and CIP investment
strategies?
Source: IIMM and US EPA Asset Management
5 Set Target
Levels of
Service (LoS)
10 Build Asset
Management
Plan
5. What is my best longterm funding strategy?
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Asset Management
Standards and Systems
Asset Management Standards
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
No current U.S. standard for holistic infrastructure asset management
International Infrastructure Management Manual (IIMM):
1996, 2002, 2006, 2011
Produced & published by Institute of Public Works Engineering, Australia (IPWEA)
National Asset Management Steering Group, New Zealand (NAMS)
•
•
PAS 55: 2008 [Publicly Available Specification]
•
•
•
•
Part 1: 28-point requirements for the optimal management of physical assets
Part 2: Guidelines for the application of PAS 55-1
International successful since first publication in 2004
PAS 55:2008 update developed by 50 organizations from 15 industry sectors in 10
countries.
ACRP Report 69: 2012
•
•
•
•
Airport Corporate Research Program Report (FAA Sponsored)
75 Airports Participated in Surveys and Site Visits
Primer: Outlines the “what” and “why” of asset management directed at executive staff
Guidebook: Summarizes the “how” directed at implementers
ISO 55000 Asset Management Series: 2014
•
•
•
•
•
Published March 2014, derived from the PAS 55:2008
ISO 55000: Overview, principles and terminology
ISO 55001: Management systems requirements
ISO 55002: Management systems guidelines for application of 55001
Most significant change is the target scope which is designed to apply to any asset type not
just physical assets
ACRP Report 69, Transportation Research Board, Sponsored by FAA
Asset Management Systems
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Market Leadership for Enterprise Asset Management Systems (EAMS)
Survey Results
from the 75 Airports who participated
in the ACRP Guidebook development
• 63% use a Computerized
Maintenance Management
System (CMMS)
• 35% used either
• Maximo (by IBM)
• Infor EAMS (Enterprise Asset
Management System)
• Oracle WAM
(Work and Asset
Management)
The Magic Quadrant is a graphical representation
of the Delivery Utility EAM marketplace at and for
a specific time period. It depicts Gartner’s analysis
of how certain vendors measure against criteria for
that marketplace, as defined by Gartner.
The Magic Quadrant is copyrighted November 2011 by Gartner, Inc.
Asset Management Systems
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS)
Proteus V CMMS software
Provides Asset management,
Preventive Maintenance
Scheduling, Inventory
management and Work order
management
ProCMMS Helps airports
increase profitability through
improved asset life,
optimized asset utilization,
and reduced asset
maintenance costs
Qware Preventive
maintenance solutions for
airports, hangars, and
parking garages, runways
and taxiways.
FacilityONE Transforms any
facility’s fragmented information
into one organized easily
accessible solution for intelligent
management.
Cityworks is a GIS-centric asset
management solution to perform
intelligent and cost-effective
inspection, monitoring, and
condition assessment.
AirSide is a airfield lighting
focused asset management
solution to perform intelligent and
cost-effective inspection,
monitoring, and condition
assessment.
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Factors Shaping
AGL Maintenance Strategies
Airfield Ground Lighting
Factors Shaping AGL Maintenance Strategies
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airport Safety Standards
Airport Strategic &
Asset Management Plans
AGL
Maintenance
International Standards & Regulations
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
ICAO Annex 14, Chapter 10.
Aerodrome Maintenance
 Preventative Maintenance
Programs
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14
– Aeronautics and Space Part 139
 139.301 Records
 139.327 Self-inspection Program
 139.339 Airport condition
reporting
FAA AC 150/5340-26
Maintenance of Airport Visual Aid
Facilities
 3.2 Maintenance Records
 3.3.4 Preventative Maintenance
Inspection Program
Transport Canada AC 302-008
Maintenance of Runway & Taxiway
Lighting Systems
 9.0 Preventative Maintenance
Inspection Check Procedures
FAA National Part 139 CertAlert
 CFR 14 Part 139
 5340-26
 5340-30
 Engineering Brief 83
Transport Canada CASA 2014-05
 TP 312 stipulates detailed
preventative maintenance
program
 AC 302-00
Maintenance Management
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Types of Maintenance Strategies
Reactive
Emergency
[Unplanned]
Breakdown
Maintenance
Strategy
Proactive
Corrective
Run to Failure
[Planned]
Usage-based Maintenance UBM
Regular examination of equipment for defects
by means of PM checklists and sensory
perception
Condition Based Maintenance CBM
Regular examination of equipment to determine
what corrective actions should be performed
with best timing
Preventive
UBM
Predictive
CBM
Deferred /
Programmable
Immediate
Systematic
Routine
Statistical-Based
Condition-Based
Proactive vs. Reactive Maintenance
Salt Lake City, Utah
Total Affect on Workload
Total Workload
100%
% Total Maintenance Man
Hours
March 2-4, 2016
25% Potential
Reduction
80%
60%
Proactive
Maintenance
40%
Reactive
Maintenance
20%
0%
0
1
2
3
Years
Life Cycle Engineering article http://www.lce.com/pdfs/The-PMPdM-Program-124.pdf
Proactive vs. Reactive Maintenance
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Total Affect on Maintenance Investments
Proactive
Maintenance
Optimal
Maintenance
Reactive
Maintenance
High $
Total Cost
Maintenance Investment
Costs ($)
Optimum
Costs
Reactive
Maintenance Costs
[Emergency Repair]
Proactive Maintenance
Costs
[Preventive/Predictive]
Low $
Low
Number of Failures
High
Energies, Open Access Energy Research, Engineering and Policy Journal, http://www.mdpi.com
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Asset Management Application
Airfield Lighting
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
10 Step Process to Asset Management
Work sessions with Operations and Maintenance Staff
1
2
Asset
Performance
and Failure
Modes
3
6 Determine
Business Risk
(Criticality)
7
Optimize
Operations &
Maintenance
Investment
8
Develop
Asset Registry
Determine
Residual Life
Optimize
Capital
Investment
4 Determine
Life Cycle &
Replacement
Costs
9 Determine
Funding
Strategy
Source: US EPA Asset Management Training
5 Set Target
Levels of
Service (LoS)
10 Build Asset
Management
Plan
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Asset Hierarchy Example: 3 Levels
Level
1
Assets
100
Airfield
200
Building, Structure and
Fabric
300
Level
2
Assets
201
Runway Lights
Baggage
202
Taxiway Lights
Safety, Security and Fire
203
Approach Lighting
Information and
Communications
204
Guidance Signs
205
Control Systems
600
People and Related Transport
206
Power Equipment
700
Areas, Railways and Vehicles
207
Transformers & Cables
800
Services and Utilities
208
Obstruction & Beacons
Infrastructure Level
209
Windcones
210
Apron Lighting
211
Installation & Mounting
400
500
Asset Group Level
ACRP Report 69, p. 53
Hierarchy is Built
To Maintenance Managed
Item (MMI)
Level
3
Assets
301
Cable
302
Housing
303
Power Supply
304
Light Engine
305
Gaskets / Seals
306
Lighting Arrestors
307
Fuses
308
Circuit Breakers
309
Printed Circuit Board (PCB)
310
Power Transformer
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Asset Hierarchy Example: 4 Levels
Level
2
Assets
201
Runway Lights
202
Taxiway Lights
203
Approach Lighting
204
Guidance Signs
205
Control Systems
206
Power Equipment
207
Transformers & Cables
208
Obstruction & Beacons
209
Windcones
210
Apron Lighting
211
Installation & Mounting
Asset Group Level
Hierarchy is Built
To Maintenance Managed
Item (MMI)
Level
3
Assets
301
Touchdown Zone W
Level
4
Assets
302
Centerline W/R
401
Cable
303
Centerline W/W
402
Housing
304
High Intensity Edge
403
Power Supply
305
404
Light Engine
306
405
Gaskets / Seals
307
406
Lighting Arrestors
308
407
Fuses
309
408
Circuit Breakers
310
409
Printed Circuit Board (PCB)
Asset Sub-Group Level
410
Power Transformer
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Asset Library
Load Library with all types of Airfield Lighting Assets
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Asset Registry
Description
Asset Type
Location
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Asset Tagging / Locations
ALCMS
LED PAPI
Taxiway
Edge Lights
Runway
TDZ Lights
Taxiway
Signs
Runway CL
Lights
Runway
Edge Lights
All AGL assets are tagged
RFID, Barcodes, QR Codes
Taxiway
C/L Lights
Runway
Guard Lights
Approach
Constant Current
Regulators
(Lighting Vault)
Location Loaded
in AGL Asset Registry
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Asset Validation & Hand-over
“Poor Asset Handover Processes result in a loss of asset data and information, which
negatively affects the ability of the asset manager to determine strategies to maintain
service levels and manage risk until those data and information gaps are closed”
Airports need a defined
process for asset
validation and handover…
•
•
•
Asset performance validated
Support material delivered
(manuals / drawings)
Training completed
(Operations and
Maintenance)
Asset Management Systems can
provide a method for management
to control and visualize asset
validation / acceptance
ACRP Report 69, p. 40
ACRP Report 69, p. 40
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Lighting Data Collection
Inspect Airfield Assets
Work Order Management
[Plan, Schedule, Repair & Close]
Report / Update
Asset Condition
Electronic Part 139 Inspection
Electronic
Logging
Asset Management
Analysis Tools & Reports
Airport Asset
Management (AM)
System
MM Data
Input
into EAM
Airfield Assets
Database
(CMMS)
Asset Management Application
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Part 139 Inspection Dashboard
Asset Management for Airfields
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Asset Management for Airfields
Summary
Airport
Executive Staff
Endorsed
Enhanced
Customer
Experience
Reduced
Costs
Asset
Management
Policy / Plans
Increased
Operational
Efficiency
Data Collection /
Integration /
Analysis
Optimize
Maintenance
Strategy
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Palace Convention Center
Salt Lake City, Utah
Title: Sustainability Improvements – Airfield
Electrical and Lighting Update
Speaker: Kathryn Masters, City of Atlanta
Date: March 3, 2016
Project Overview
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
• Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International
Airport
• FC-7036 Airfield LED Lights
• Engineer – Chris Rogers, City of Atlanta
• Project Manager – Kenny Goggins, City of
Atlanta
• Contractor – Brooks-Berry-Haynie &
Associates, Inc.
• Vendors – ADB, Lumicurve, etc?
Sustainability Benefits
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
• LED longer life cycle reduces number airfield
light fixtures being produced, packaged,
transported and ultimately decreasing the
disposal of light fixtures.
• LED lights use less power therefore reducing
the amount of power generated by the utility
company
• All incandescent fixtures that are removed are
being recycled
Power Savings
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
South Airfield Power Consumption
$25,000
160,000
140,000
$20,000
Baseline
100,000
Total
kWh
80,000
$10,000
60,000
40,000
$5,000
20,000
Sep-15
Aug-15
Jul-15
Jun-15
May-15
Apr-15
Mar-15
Feb-15
Jan-15
Dec-14
Nov-14
Oct-14
Sep-14
Aug-14
Jul-14
Jun-14
May-14
Apr-14
Mar-14
Feb-14
Jan-14
Dec-13
Nov-13
0
Oct-13
$0
kwh
Monthly Cost
$15,000
120,000
Total
Cost
Power Savings
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Month
13-Oct
13-Nov
13-Dec
14-Jan
14-Feb
14-Mar
14-Apr
14-May
14-Jun
14-Jul
14-Aug
14-Sep
14-Oct
14-Nov
14-Dec
15-Jan
15-Feb
15-Mar
15-Apr
15-May
15-Jun
15-Jul
15-Aug
15-Sep
Airfield Lighting South Vault
Peak KW
Average
Meter Read Billing Days Total kWh Demand Total Cost
cost
Baseline
115,371
10/22/2013
30
112,200
438
$10,938
9.75
115,371
11/19/2013
28
112,200
564
9.02
$10,118
115,371
12/19/2013
30
136,800
552
$11,480
8.39
115,371
1/22/2014
34
146,400
564
8.42
$12,321
115,371
2/20/2014
29
127,200
558
$11,259
8.85
115,371
3/23/2014
31
119,400
576
$10,927
9.15
115,371
4/22/2014
30
114,000
576
$10,605
9.3
115,371
5/21/2014
29
101,400
414
$8,853
8.73
6/22/2014
32
106,800
582
$13,766
12.89 115,371
7/22/2014
30
112,800
576
$15,445
13.69 115,371
115,371
8/21/2014
30
104,400
570
$17,852
17.1
9/22/2014
32
126,000
582
$21,068
16.72 115,371
115,371
10/22/2014
30
117,000
444
$10,997
9.4
115,371
11/19/2014
28
102,600
288
$8,247
8.04
115,371
12/21/2014
32
124,200
528
$11,038
8.89
115,371
1/22/2015
32
138,000
480
$11, 733
8.5
115,371
2/22/2015
31
111,600
456
$10,030
8.99
115,371
3/23/2015
29
109,800
456
$9,908
9.02
115,371
4/22/2015
30
85,200
342
$7,686
9.02
115,371
5/21/2015
29
64,200
210
$5,550
8.65
6/22/2015
32
71,400
306
$10,248
14.35 115,371
7/27/2015
35
79,200
306
$12, 060 15.23 115,371
8/24/2015
28
61,800
312
$10,777
17.44 115,371
9/23/2015
30
70,200
192
$8,839
12.59 115,371
Savings
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$502.75
$2,721.80
$4,423.70
$6,311.19
$5,507.92
$9,342.06
$5,687.61
$34,497.03
Airfield LED Lights Prior to Project
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Airfield Electrical Geek Data
March 2-4, 2016
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Salt Lake City, Utah
3 Lighting Vaults (North, Center, South)
More than 20, 000 lights
150 Lighting Circuits
700 Guidance Signs
Airfield Lighting Monitoring & Control System with
remote access control from Air Traffic Control Tower
Redundant Utility Feeds with generator backup at
North and South Airfield Lighting Vaults
Center Airfield Lighting Vault has one utility feed and
back generator
All runway CCRs are 5 step
All taxiway CCRs are 3 step
Project Geek Data
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
•
Project Scope: Convert all existing airfield incandescent guidance signs, taxiway and runway lights
to LED lighting technology. The project included 4 runways ranging from 9,000 to 12, 500 linear
feet, 11 taxiways and 52 taxiway exits.
•
Project Cost: $15,929,313.79
•
Project Schedule: May 30, 2014 to August 1, 2015
•
•
•
Number of LED Lights Installed: Approx. 13, 000
Runway Lights – 2, 000 High Intensity
Taxiway Lights – 11, 000
•
Number of LED Airfield Guidance Signs Installed: 700
•
Linear of Footage of Cables Replaced: 160, 000 LF of 5Kv
•
•
•
•
Equipment New and Revised:
4 new 30kw 5 step 6.6A CCRs
Adjusted KW output taps on 111 CCR to accommodate reduce LED load consumption
39 CCR were identified to be replaced in an upcoming project (Taxiway Edge light circuits)
Project Goals
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
• Compliance with Current FAA AC to Eliminate
any Question of Interspersed Lights
• Increased Safety – Reduced Maintenance
• Reduce Cost – Replacement of Lights
• Reduce Cost – Lower Electrical Consumption
Project Challenge/Resolution
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
• Runway Edge Lights – FAA Funding
• Runway Centerline Lights – Sole Certified
• Transformer & Light Premature Death
Project Challenge/Resolution
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
• Phasing – Pilot Approach Visibility
• Phasing Implimentation:
– Runways
• Edge Lights
• Centerline & Touchdown Lights
• Signs
– Taxiways North to South
• Centerline & Edge
• Signs
Pretty Pictures
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Pretty Pictures
March 2-4, 2016
Salt Lake City, Utah
Bragging
March 2-4, 2016
•
•
•
•
Salt Lake City, Utah
First Hub Airport 100% LED
Completion one (1) YEAR ahead of schedule
Completion under budget
Zero Safety Issues or Incidents