II. ELECTROCHEMISTRY

advertisement
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
II. ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Introduction
In 1812 Humphry Davy wrote: “If a piece of zinc and a piece of copper be brought in
contact with each other, they will form a weak electrical combination, of which the zinc will
be positive, and the copper negative; this may be learnt by the use of a delicate condensing
electrometer”.
One can consider what happens when electrodes (zinc and copper in Davy’s experiment)
are immersed in electrolyte solutions and connected via an external metallic conductor. Such
an arrangement is a typical electrochemical cell.
Electromotive force (EMF) of the cell
One can consider a cell built from a zinc electrode immersed into a solution of ZnSO 4 and
a copper electrode immersed in CuSO 4 (Daniel’s cell). The two solutions are separated by a
porous barrier, which allows electrical contact but prevents excessive mixing of the solutions
by interdiffusion. This cell can be represented by a scheme:
Zn|Zn2+|Cu2+|Cu
where vertical line denotes phase boundaries.
According to definition given by IUPAC the electromotive force (emf), E, is defined as
follows: the emf is equal in sign and in magnitude to the electrical potential of the metallic
conducting lead on the right when that of the similar lead on the left is taken as zero, the cell
being open.
Thus it can be written that:
E  Eright  Eleft
1
where Eright and Eleft would be the potentials of the right and left leads relative to some
common standard. The meaning of left and right refers to the cells as written.
Measurement of emf – the potentiometer
The definition of emf states that the potential difference is measured while the cell is open,
i.e., while no current is being drawn from the external leads. In practice E is being measured
under conditions in which the current drawn from the cell is so small as to be negligible. The
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
method, devised by POGGENDORF used a circuit known as potentiometer (a basic one is
shown in Figure 1).
Figure 1. Potentiometer scheme
The slide wire is calibrated with a scale so that any setting of the contact corresponds to a
certain voltage. With a double through switch in the standard cell position S, slide wire is set
to the voltage reading of standard cell, and rheostat is being adjusted until no current flows
through the galvanometer G. At this point the potential difference between A and B, the IR
along the section AB of the slide wire, just balances the emf of the standard cell. Then switch
of the unknown cell is being set to the X position and slide wire is being readjusted until no
current flows through galvanometer. From the new setting the emf of the cell can be read
directly from the scale of the slide wire. The most widely used standard is the Weston cell
written as:
Cd(Hg)|CdSO 4 · 8/3 H2 O|CdSO 4 (sat.sol.)|Hg2 SO4 |Hg
The cell reaction is:
8
8
Cd s   Hg 2 SO4 s   H 2 Ol   CdSO4  H 2 Os   2 Hg l 
3
3
The accuracy of the compensation method for measuring an emf is limited only by the
accuracy of the standard E and of the various resistances in the circuit. The precision of the
method is determined mainly by the sensitivity of the galvanometer used to detect the balance
between unknown and standard emf.
Reversible cells
An electrode immersed in a solution is said to constitute a half cell. The typical cell is
combination of two half cells. One should be primarily interested in so called reversible cells,
which can be recognized by the following criterion: the cell is connected with a potentiometer
arrangement for emf measurement by compensation method. The emf of the cell is measured:
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
a) with a small current flowing through the cell in one direction
b) then with an imperceptible flow of current
c) and finally with a small flow in opposite direction
If the cell is reversible, its emf changes only slightly during this sequence, and there is no
discontinuity in the value of the emf at the point of balance (b). Reversibility implies that any
chemical reaction occurring in the cell can proceed in either direction, depending on the flow
of current, and the null point of the driving force of the reaction is just balanced by the
compensating emf of the potentiometer.
One of the sources of irreversibility in cells is the liquid junction, like in the Daniel’s cell
presented before. Another one can be salt bridge which consists of a connecting tube filled
with a concentrated solution of a salt, usually KCl. Than cell scheme can be written as:
Zn|Zn2+||Cu2+|Cu
A better way to avoid irreversible effects is to avoid liquid junctions altogether, by using
single electrolyte, like in the Weston cell (CdSO 4 solution saturated with sparingly soluble
Hg2 SO4 .
Types of half cells
One of the simplest half cells consists of metal electrode in contact with solution
containing ions of the metal e.g. silver and silver-nitrate solution.
Gas electrodes can be constructed by placing a strip of nonreactive metal (platinum or gold) in
contact with both the solution and the gas stream. The hydrogen electrode consists of a
platinum strip exposed to a current of hydrogen and partly immersed in an acid solution.
Overall reaction is:
1
H2  H   e
2
2
In nonmetal-nongas electrodes, the inert metal passes into a liquid or solid phase e.g.
bromine-bromide half cell: Pt|Br2 |Br-.
In an oxidation-reduction electrode an inert metal dips into a solution containing ions in
two different oxidation states, e.g. ferric and ferrous ions in the half cal Pt|Fe 2+|Fe3+. When
electrons are supplied to the electrode the reaction is Fe 3+ + e  Fe2+. Since it is a function of
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
electrodes either to accept electrons from, or to donate electrons to ions in the solution they
are all in the sense oxidation-reduction electrodes.
Metal, insoluble salt electrodes consist of a metal in contact with one of its slightly soluble
salts; in the half cell, this salt is in turn in contact with a solution containing common anion.
An example is the silver, silver chloride half cell Ag|AgCl|Cl-(c1 ) and overall electrode
reaction is AgCl s   e

Ag s   Cl  .

Metal, insoluble oxides electrodes are similar to the metal, insoluble salt one e.g. antimony,
antimony trioxide electrode with a scheme Sb|Sb 2 O3 |OH—and an overall reaction
Sbs   3OH 
1
3
Sb2 O3  H 2 Ol   3e . An antimony rod is covered with a thin layer of
2
2
oxide and dips into a solution containing OH- ions.
Classification of cells
When two suitable cells are connected an electrochemical cell is given. The connection is
made by bringing the solutions in the half cells into contact so that ions can pass between
them. If these two solutions are the same, there is no liquid junction, and one can have a cell
without transference. If the solutions are different, the transport of ions across the junction
will cause irreversible changes in the two electrolytes, and one can have a cell with
transference.
Cells in which the driving force is the change in concentration are called concentration
cells. The change in concentration can occur either in the electrolyte or in electrodes. The
variety of electrochemical cells is given in Figure 2.
Electrochemical cells
Chemical cells
Without
transference
With
transference
Concentrationl cells
Electrolyte
Concentration
cells
Without
transference
Electrode
Concentration
cells
With
transference
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Figure 2. Electrochemical cells
Emf and standard emf of the cell
For generalized cell reaction:
aA  bB

cC  dD

free-energy change in terms of the activities of the reactants is:
aCc a Dd
G  G  RT ln a b
a AaB
0
3
Since G=-|z|FE, division by -|z|F gives
RT aCc a Dd
EE 
ln
z F a Aa a Bb
0
4
called Nernst equation. E0 is called a standard emf of the cell. Determination of this value is
one of the most important procedures in electrochemistry. As an example lets consider cell
consisting of a hydrogen electrode and a silver-silver chloride electrode immersed in a
solution of hydrochloric acid: Pt(H2 )|HCl(m)|AgCl|Ag. The overall reaction is:
AgCl 

1
H 2 H   Cl   Ag

2
The emf of the cell is
E  E0
a Ag aCl  a H 
RT
 ln
1
F
a AgCl a H2 2
5
Setting the activities of the solid phases equal to the unity, and choosing hydrogen pressure so
that aH2 =1 (for ideal gas P=1atm) following reaction can be obtained:
E  E0 
RT
ln aCl  a H 
F
6
Introducing the mean activity of the ions defined by a ±=±m one can obtain
E  E0 
E
2 RT
2 RT
ln a   E 0 
ln   m
F
F
2 RT
2 RT
ln m  E 0 
ln  
F
F
7
8
According to the Debye-Hückel theory, in dilute solutions ln ±=Am1/2 , where A is a constant.
Hence the equation becomes:
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
E
2 RT
2 RTA
ln m  E 0 
ln m1 / 2
F
F
9
If the quantity on the left is plotted against m1/2 , and extrapolated to m=0, the intercept at m=0
gives value of E0 .
II.A. DETERMINATION OF THE EMF OF THE DANIEL’S CELL
Goal: To know the principle of electrochemical cell functioning and the method of measuring
the emf
Introduction
Daniel’s cell consist of zinc and copper electrodes immersed in its sulfate solutions. The
cell scheme is Zn|ZnSO 4 ||CuSO 4 |Cu and the cell reaction is:
Zn + CuSO 4  ZnSO 4 + Cu
The E0 is E0 R-E0 L=0.337-(-0.736)=1.1V
The Nernst equation for Daniel’s cell is:
E  E0 
RT a ZnSO4
ln
F
aCuSO4
10
where is activity of zinc and copper ions. Mean activity can be expressed as a±=±m where ±
is the activity coefficient and m is molality.
As stated before electromotive force of the cell can be determined by means of Poggendorf
method. In this technique resistance of tested and standard (Weston) cell should be chosen for
which there is no current flow through galvanometer. Voltage decrease, UX, for tested cell,
equal to its emf, EX, is given by equation:
E X  U X  I 0  RX
11
where I0 is residual current intensity and RX is resistance for which there is no current flow
through galvanometer.
Value of I0 is unknown and that is why comparative measurement with standard cell (with
known emf, EW =1,018V) should be carried out. Voltage decrease, UW , for standard cell, equal
to its emf, EW , is given by equation:
EW  U W  I 0  RW
12
Electromotive force of a tested cell can be calculated as:
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
E X  EW
RX
RW
13
Experimental procedure:
1. Prepare electrolyte solutions of given concentrations.
2. Connect electrochemical cell as given in the scheme
Scheme 1. Daniel’s cell scheme
3. Measure electromotive force of the tested cell. Repeat measurement 3 times.
Data analysis:
1. Put emf of tested cell into the table.
2. Calculate emf of tested cell by using Nernst equation. Standard electrode potentials
and mean activity coefficients are given in the tables.
3. Calculate relative error of emf measurement (%) and put it to a table.
Cell
EEXPERIMENT [V]
ET HEORY [V]
E EXPERIMENT  E THEORY
E THEORY
 100%
Standard electrode potentials, E0
Electrode
Zn, Zn2+
Cu, Cu2+
E0 [V]
-0.763
0.337
Mean activity coefficients, γ for electrolyte solutions at 25ºC
Electrolyte
Molality [mol/kg]
0.005
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.5
1
CuSO4
0.573
0.438
0.317
0.217
0.154
0.104
0.062
0.043
ZnSO4
0.477
0.387
0.298
0.202
0.15
0.104
0.062
0.043
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
II.B. DETERMINATION OF AGNO 3 CONCENTRATION IN AQUEOUS
SOLUTION BY MEAN OF POTENTIOMETRIC TITRATION
Goal: To know the principle of electrochemical cell functioning and to observe the influence
of the solution concentration on emf
Introduction
Measurement of the potential of certain electrodes offers a convenient and accurate means
for determining the end points of titrations. For example, a hydrogen electrode or a glass
electrode may be used to determine the pH during the titration of an acid by the base, Figure 3
gives the emf obtained with a hydrogen electrode and calomel electrode during the titration of
a solution of hydrochloric acid with a solution of sodium hydroxide.
Figure 3. Electromotive force obtained with a hydrogen electrode and calomel electrode
during the titration of a solution of hydrochloric acid with a solution of sodium hydroxide.
At the beginning of the titration the pH changes slowly because a considerable amount of
sodium hydroxide must be added to change the hydrogen ion concentration 10-fold. As the
end point is approached the pH changes rapidly. When the solution is neutral, the activities of
the hydrogen ions and hydroxyl ions are the same. The voltage of the hydrogen electrode
against the calomel one is E=0.6942V.
At the end point the concentration of hydrogen ions is very small in comparison to hydroxyl
ions. When weak acids and bases are used the end point will not come at pH=7, because the
salts produced in the neutralization are hydrolyzed and give an acid or alkaline reaction.
The end points in oxidation-reduction reactions may be determined by measuring the potential
difference between a platinum wire or other inert electrode and a calomel one. In Figure 4
results of a titration of ferrous sulfate with potassium dichromate are given.
Figure 4. Potentiometric titration of ferrous sulfate with potassium dichromate shoeing the use
of a plot of E/ml vs. volume to obtain the end point
In order to locate the end point more accurately, it is helpful to plot the slope E/V vs. the
volume of reagent added.
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
For determining end points in neutralization it is possible to bubble oxygen or even air over a
platinized electrode. Since the oxygen electrode is not reversible, it is not possible to set –nFE
equal to F, and no theoretical significance can be attached to the absolute voltages. But when
addition of reagents leads to a rapid change of OH- concentration and potential the end point
can be identified.
It is also possible to obtain end points in precipitation reactions. Let us consider determination
of AgNO 3 concentration with a concentration cell:
Ag|AgCl|AgCl (sat. sol.) (mAg+)1 ||AgNO 3 (mAg+)2 |AgCl|Ag
where (mAg+)1 is Ag+ concentration in AgCl saturated solution and (mAg+)2 is unknown
concentration of AG ions in AgNO 3 solution.
To the right half-cell, containing AgNO 3 solution, NaCl solution of known concentration is
being added:
AgNO 3 + NaCl  NaNO 3 + AgCl(s)
Ag+ concentration in titrated solution decreases as a result of AgCl precipitation.
Before titration silver ion concentration in titrated solution is higher than in saturated solution:
(mAg+)2 > (mAg+)1
In stoichiometric point concentrations of Ag ions in both solutions are equal:
(mAg+)2 = (mAg+)1
After this point Ag+ concentration in titrated solution is smaller than in saturated one,
(mAg+)1 > (mAg+)2 
L
m Cl
where L= (mAg+)1 = (mCl-)1 is AgCl solubility product.
According to Nernst equation following dependency of emf in function of molality can be
presented:
E
 
 
a Ag 
RT
ln
F
a Ag 
2
1

 
 
m Ag 
RT
ln
F
m Ag 
2
14
1
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
According to this equation with decrease of along with
(mAg+)2 concentration cells emf
decreases, whereas for (mAg+)1 > (mAg+)2 there is a change in emf sign, E<0, which decribes
change in character of reaction proceeding on electrodes.
Scheme of the setup is shown below.
Experimental procedure:
1. Connect electrochemical cell as given in the scheme
2. Read value of EMF on the voltage meter.
3. Add aqueous solution of NaCl (portions 0.2-0.5 mL) to AgNO 3 solution and mix it
precisely
4. Read value of EMF on the voltage meter after every addition of another portion of
NaCl solution
5. After change of the EMF value to the negative one add another 2 mL of NaCl
(portions of 0.5 mL)
Data analysis:
1. Prepare a titration graph EMF=f(VNaOH)
2. For
exact
determination
of
stoichiometric
point
prepare
derivative
graph
EMF
 f (VNaCl )
VNaCl
3. From the graph read stoichiometric point and calculate number of moles of AgNO 3 in
titrated solution
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
II.C. pH-METRIC TITRATION
Goal: Main goal of the exercise is to analyze changes in pH of the solutions during pH-metric
titrations and calculation of acid concentration in its aqueous solution.
Introduction
One of the most important examples of chemical equilibrium is the one that exists when acids
and bases are present in solution. According to the Brønsted-Lowry classification an acid is a
proton donor and a base is a proton acceptor.
These definitions make no mention of the solvent. One of the properties of central interest in
aqueous (one of the most important) solutions of acids and bases is the pH, which is defined
as
pH   log a H O 
1
3
where H3 O+ is the hydronium ion, a representation of the state of the proton in aqueous
solution. At low concentrations, the activity of hydronium ions approximately equal to their
molality and molar concentration, so the determination of pH is an indication of hydronium
ion concentration. However, many thermodynamic observables depend on pH itself, and there
is no need to make this approximation and interpretation.
Acid-base equilibrium in water
An acid HA takes part in the following proton transfer equilibrium in water:
HAaq   H 2 Ol 

H 3O  aq   A  aq 

K
a H O  a A
3
a HA a H 2O
2
where A‾ is the conjugate base of the acid. If one confine attention to dilute solutions, the
activity of water is close to 1, and the equilibrium can be expressed as:
 
aH 3O a A 
Ka 
aHA
3
where K a is the acidity constant.
To simplify the discussion if all ions are present in small concentrations one can replace
activities by numerical values of the molar concentrations [J] e.g. [HA] in moles of a
substance per liter:
H O A 


Ka
3
HA

4
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
It is common to report values of K a in terms of its negative logarithm, pK a, which gives an
insight into strength of the acid (high pK a => low K a => weak acid).
For a base B in water, the characteristic proton transfer equilibrium is
Baq   H 2 Ol 

HB  aq   OH  aq 

K
a HB  aOH 
a B a H 2O
5
where HB+ is is the conjugate acid of the base B. In dilute solutions, where activity of water is
1, one can express this equilibrium in terms of the basicity constant K b:
Kb 


a HB  a OH 
a B 

6
Similarly to acidic constant, basicity constant can be used to assess the strength of a base. It is
common to express proton transfer equilibrium involving a base in terms of its conjugate acid:
HB  aq   H 2 Ol 

H 3O  aq   Baq 

Ka 
a H O aB
3
a HB 
7
The acidity constant of the conjugate acid HB+ is related to the basicity constant of the base
B, which may be verified by multiplying the expressions for K a and K b:
8
K a Kb  K w
where K w is the autoprotolysis constant of the water:
2 H 2 Ol 

H 3O  aq   OH  aq 

K w  a H O  aOH 
3
9
At 25ºC, K w=1.008 × 10-14 (pK w=14), showing that only a few of a water molecules are
ionized. If, in analogy to pH, pOH=-log aOHˉ will be introduced, then it follows that
pK w  pH  pOH
10
and because molar concentrations of H3 O+ and OH- are equal in pure water then in 25ºC
pH=½pK w  7.00.
Acid base titrations
One method a chemist can use to investigate acid-base reactions is a titration. The
word "titration" comes from the Latin word "titalus", meaning inscription or title. The French
word, titre, also from this origin, means rank. Titration is by definition the determination of
rank or concentration of a solution.
The origins of volumetric analysis are in late 18th century French chemistry. Francois
ANTOINE HENRI DESCROIZILLES developed the first burette (which looked more like a
graduated cylinder) in 1791. JOSEPH LOUIS GAY-LUSSAC developed an improved version
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
of the burette that included a side arm, and coined the terms "pipette" and "burette" in a 1824
paper about on the standarization of indigo solutions. A major breakthrough in the
methodology and popularization of volumetric analysis was due to KARL FRIEDRICH
MOHR, who redesigned the burette by placing a clamp and a tip at the bottom, and wrote the
first textbook on the topic, Lehrbuch der chemisch-analytischen Titrirmethode (Textbook of
analytical-chemical titration methods), published in 1855.
A pH titration is performed by adding small, accurate amounts of standard base to an
acid of unknown concentration. The pH is recorded methodically and is plotted vs. the
volume of base added to the acid solution. The result of this plot is an "S" shaped curve. The
inflection point of this curve (middle of the "S") is indicative of the equivalance
(stoichiometric) point.
This point occurs when the acid and base in solution are
stoichiometrically equivalent. An equivalance point can be very useful in determining the
concentration of an acid or base. Chemists can also titrate using an indicator to determine the
end point of a titration. An indicator contains a molecule that exists in at least two different
forms which have different colors. The forms differ by the addition or removal of a hydrogen
ion. Thus, the color of the indicator solution changes when the pH changes past a certain
point.
Let one consider titration of a weak acid (such as CH3 COOH) and strong base (NaOH)
– the analyte (the solution being titrated). At the stoichiometric point their mixtures become
an aqueous solution of the weak acid-strong base salt (sodium acetate). It also contains ions
streaming from autoprotolysis. The presence of the Brønsted base CH3 COO - means that pH
greater then 7 can be expected (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. pH-metric titration of strong and weak acid with a strong base
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
For prediction of the pH at any stage of acid-base titration one should suppose that VA
volume of a solution of a weak acid with nominal molar concentration A0 is being titrated
with with a solution of strong base of molar concentration B. Approximations given before
are based on the fact that the acid is weak, and therefore that HA is more abundant than any
A- ions in the solution. Further more, when HA is present; it provides hydronium ions that
greatly outnumber any ions from the autoprotolysis of water. Similarly, when excess base is
present number of OH ions is much greater than that from autoprotolysis of water.
At the start of the titration, pH of the analyte solution (weak acid) can be calculated as:
1
pH  pK a  log A0
2
11
After addition of some strong base (still before stoichiometric point) concentration of A- ions
stems almost entirely from the salt that is present, for a weak acid present provides only a few
A- ions. Therefore, [A-]=S, the molar concentration of salt (base). The amount of the acid
molecules that remains is the original amount A0 V0 less the amount of HA molecules that
have been converted to the salt by addition of base, so the molar concentration of acid is
A’=A-S which ignores additional small loss of HA as a result of its ionization in the solution.
Hence
Ka 
a H O  a A
3
a HA

aH O S
3
A'
12
The derivation has made the doubtful approximation that the activity of the A- ions is close to
1. It follows that:
 A' 
pH  pK a  log 
S
13
called the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, which in general form, after recognition that A’ is
molar concentration of acid in solution and S is molar concentration of base, is:
pH  pK a  log
acid 
base
14
When the molar concentrations of acid and salt are equal pH=pK a – hence pK a can be
measured directly from the pH of the mixture.
At the stoichiometric point, the H3 O+ ions in the solution stem from the influence of the
OH- ions on the autoprotolysis equilibrium, and the OH- ions are produced by the proton
transfer equilibrium from H2 O to A-. Because only a small amount of acid is formed in this
way, the concentration of A- ions is almost exactly that of the salt, and one can write that [ALodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
]=S. The number of OH- ions arise from the proton transfer equilibrium greatly outnumber
those produced by the water autoprotolysis, that is why one can set [HA]=[OH-]:
Kb 
a HA aOH 
a A
OH 

 2
15
S
At this point pH can be calculated as:
pH 
1
1
1
pK a  pK w  log S
2
2
2
16
When surplus of strong base has been added that the titration has been carried out well past
stoichiometric point, the pH is determined by the excess base present. Then, [H3 O+] =
Kw/[OH-] and
pH  pK w  log B'
17
where B’ is the molar concentration of excess base.
Experimental procedure:
1. Calibrate a pH-meter with a phthalate buffer (pH=4)
2. Prepare an aqueous solution of strong acid (10 mL of strong acid, 20 mL of acetone
and 20 mL of distilled water)
3. Fill a burette with a NaOH solution (0.2 mol/L)
4. Titrate an acid solution by adding 0.1-0.5 mL of a base
5. Prepare an aqueous solution of weak acid (10 mL of strong acid, 20 mL of acetone and
20 mL of distilled water)
6. Fill a burette with a NaOH solution (0.2 mol/L)
7. Titrate an acid solution by adding 0.1-0.5 mL of a base
Strong acid - HCl
VNaOH [mL]
pH
Weak acid - CH3 COOH
( pH )
V NaOH
VNaOH [mL]
pH
( pH )
V NaOH
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Data analysis:
1. Prepare a titration graph pH=f(VNaOH) for a strong and weak acid separately. Inflexion
point of titration curve denotes stoichiometric point.
2. For
exact
determination
of
stoichiometric
point
prepare
derivative
graph
( pH )
 f (VNaOH )
VNaOH
3. Calculate number of moles and concentrations of acids in solution
4. For a weak acid prepare a graph log
VNaOH 0  VNaOH
VNaOH
 f VNaOH  and determine its
pK a. Compare it with theoretical one (hint: you can find it in chemical tables).
Problems to solve:
1. Estimate the pH of 0.1M HClO(aq). pK a=7.43
2. The stoichiometric point of a titration of 25 mL of 0.1M HClO(aq)with 0.1M
NaOH(aq) occurs when the molar concentration of NaClO is 0.05M (volume of the
solution increased to 50 mL). Calculate pH.
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
II.D. CONDUCTOMETRIC TITRATION
Goal: Main goal of the exercise is to analyze changes in conductivity of the solutions during
conductometric titrations and calculations of acid concentration in its aqueous solution.
Introduction
The connection between chemistry and electricity is a very old one, going back to
ALESSANDRO VOLTA'S discovery, in 1793, that electricity could be produced by placing
two dissimilar metals on opposite sides of a moistened paper – Volta’s batteries consisted of a
series of zinc or silver disks, arranged alternately with paper soaked in salt water between
them. In 1800, Nicholson and Carlisle, using Volta's primitive battery as a source, showed
that an electric current could decompose water into oxygen and hydrogen. This was surely
one of the most significant experiments in the history of chemistry, for it implied that the
atoms of hydrogen and oxygen were associated with positive and negative electric charges,
which must be the source of the bonding forces between them. By 1812, the Swedish chemist
BERZELIUS could propose that all atoms are electrified, hydrogen and the metals being
positive, the nonmetals negative. In electrolysis, the applied voltage was thought to overpower
the attraction between these opposite charges, pulling the electrified atoms apart in the form
of ions (named by Berzelius from the Greek for “travelers”).
It would be almost exactly a hundred years later before the shared electron pair theory
of G.N. LEWIS could offer a significant improvement over this view of chemical bonding.
Meanwhile the use of electricity as a means of bringing about chemical change continued to
play a central role in the development of chemistry. HUMPHREY DAVEY prepared the first
elemental sodium by electrolysis of a sodium hydroxide melt. It was left to Davey's former
assistant, MICHAEL FARADAY, to show that there is a direct relation between the amount
of electric charge passed through the solution and the quantity of electrolysis products.
JAMES CLERK MAXWELL immediately saw this as evidence for the “molecule of
electricity”, but the world would not be receptive to the concept of the electron until the end
of the century
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Conductance and conductivity
The electric current in an electrolyyic solution consist of a flow of ions; in a metal, it
consists of a flow of electrons. The fundamental measurement used to study the motion of
ions is that of the electrical resistance, R, of the solution. The standard technique is to
incorporate a conductivity cell into one arm of the resistance bridge (Figure 1) and to search
for the balance point.
Figure 1. Conductometer scheme
The conductance, Γ, of a solution is the inverse of its resistance R: Γ=1/R. As resistance
is expressed in ohms, Ω, the conductance of a sample is expressed in Ω -1 , which officially is
designated as siemens, S, and 1 S = 1 Ω -1 . The conductance of a sample decreases with its
length l and increases with its cross-sectional area A. Therefore one can write:

A
l
1
where κ is the conductivity in siemens per meter, S m-1 .
The conductivity of a solution depends on the number of ions present, and it is normal to
introduce the molar conductivity, Λ m , which is defined as
m 

c
2
where c is the molar concentration of the added electrolyte. The SI unit of molar conductivity
is siemens metre-squared per mole (S m2 mol-1 ).
The molar conductivity of an electrolyte would be independent of concentration if κ
were proportional to the concentration of the electrolyte. However, in practice, the molar
conductivity is found to vary with the concentration. One reason for this variation is that the
number of ions in the solution might not be proportional to the concentration of the
electrolyte. For instance, the concentration of ions in the solution of weak acid depends on the
concentration of acid in a complicated way, and doubling the concentration of the acid added
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
does not double the number of ions. Secondly, because ions interact strongly with one
another, the conductivity of a solution is not exactly proportional to the number of ion present.
The concentration dependence of molar conductivities indicates that there are two classes of
electrolyte. The characteristics of a strong electrolyte is that its molar conductivity decreases
only slightly as its concentration is increased. The characteristic of a weak electrolyte is that
its molar conductivity is normal at concentrations close to zero, but decreases sharply to low
values as the concentration increases. The classification depends on the solvent employed as
well as the solute: e.g. lithium chloride is strong electrolyte in water but a weak one in
propanone.
Strong electrolytes
Strong electrolytes are substances that are virtually fully ionized in solution, and
include ionic solids and strong acids. As a result of their complete ionization, the
concentration of ions in solution is proportional to the concentration of strong electrolyte
added.
In
an
extensive
series
of measurements
during
the
XIXth
century,
FRIEDRICH
KOHLRAUSCH showed that at low concentrations the molar conuctivities of strong
electrolytes vary linearly with the square root of the concentration:
 m  0m  K c
3
This variation is called Kohlrausch’s law. The constant 0m is the limiting molar conductivity,
the molar conductivity in the limit of zero concentration (when the ions are effectively
infinitely apart from each other and do not interact with one another). The constant K is found
to depend more on the stoichiometry of the electrolyte (that is, whether it is of the form MA,
or M2 A, etc.) than on its specific identity.
Kohlrausch was also able to show that 0m can be expressed as the sum of contributions from
individual ions. If the limiting molar conductivity of the cations is denoted   and of the
anions   , then his law of the independent migration of ions states that
0m          
4
where   and   are the numbers of cations and anions per formula unit of electrolyte.
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Weak electrolytes
Weak electrolytes are not fully ionized in the solution. They include weak Brønsted acids and
bases, such as CH3 COOH and NH3 . The marked concentration dependence of their molar
conductivities arises from the displacement of the equilibrium
HAaq   H 2 Ol 

H 3O  aq   A  aq 

Ka 
 
aH 3O a A 
aHA
5
towards products at low molar concentrations.
The conductivity depends on the number of ions in the solution, and therefore on the
degree of ionization, , of the electrolyte. The degree of ionization is defined so that, for the
acid HA at molar concentration c, at equilibrium
H O   c A   c HA  1   c


3
6
If we ignore activity coefficients, the acidity constant, K a, is approximately
Ka 
 2c
1
7
Conductometric titration
The electrical conductance of a solution serves as a means for determining the end
point in chemical reactions, such as titrations of acids and bases, or precipitations.
For example, when a strong acid is added to a strong base (hydrochloric acid and sodium
hydroxide), the conductance decreases to a minimum, at which the base is completely
neutralized, and then it increases, owing to the excess of acid, as shown in the Figure 2.
6
5
4

3
2
1
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
V HCl
Figure 2. Conductometric titration of strong base by strong acid
The two lines AB and CD intersect at the point E, which is the end point. The OH‾ ions of the
base and the H+ ions of the acid have much greater motilities than the sodium and chloride
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
ions, and so the conductance is least at the end point E where the acid and the base are present
in exactly equivalent portions, and there is no excess of either OH‾ ions or H+ ions. In order
that the lines AB and CD shall be straight and thus permit calculations from set of only two
points, it is desirable to keep the volume constant throughout the titration. In order to
approach this condition, the added reagent must be concentrated, whereas the solution which
is being titrated must be dilute.
If the same titration is carried out with a weak acid (e.g. acetic acid) instead of a strong acid,
as shown in Figure 3, the excess acid beyond the end point will not cause such a sharp
increase in conductance.
6
5
4

3
2
1
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
V CH3COOH
Figure 3. Conductometric titration of strong base by weak acid
In fact, with acetic acid a horizontal line is obtained after all the sodium hydroxide has been
neutralized, because the number of ions being added in the excess of acetic acid is small,
particularly in the presence of the sodium acetate. The sharp change in the slope of the line is
useful, however, in determining end points. In the colored or turbid solutions, where a colored
indicator cannot be used, this determination of end points by means of conductance
measurements is particularly useful.
Conductance measurements are used for a variety of testing and control operations, such, for
example, as concentration of acids or salts by evaporation, leakage of salt solutions, hardness
of water, moisture content of soil or wood, and rates of chemical reaction in which the
products have a different conductance from that of the reactants.
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Experimental procedure:
1.
Fill a burette with a NaOH solution (0.2 mol/L)
2.
Fill a beaker with 5 mL of an acid (HCl) and adequate volume of water to cover
conductivity cell
3.
Read and write initial value of conductivity
4.
Titrate an acid solution by adding 0.1-0.5 mL of a base
5.
Fill a beaker with 5 mL of an acid (CH3 COOH) and adequate volume of water to cover
conductivity cell
6.
Read and write initial value of conductivity
7.
Titrate an acid solution by adding 0.1-0.5 mL of a base
Strong acid - HCl
VNaOH [mL]
Weak acid – CH3 COOH
Γ [S]
VNaOH [mL]
Γ [S]
Data analysis:
1.
Prepare a titration graph Γ=f(VNaOH) for a strong and weak acid separately. Inflexion
point of titration curve denotes stoichiometric point.
2.
Calculate number of moles and concentrations of acids in solution
Problems to solve:
A conductance cell was calibrated by filling it with a 0.02N solution of potassium chloride (κ
= 0,002768 S cm-1 ) and measuring the resistance at 25 ºC, which was found to be 457.3 ohms.
The cell was then filled with calcium chloride solution containing 0.555 gram of CaCl2 per
liter. Then measured resistance was 1050 ohms. Calculate (a) the cell constant for the cell, (b)
the specific conductance of the CaCl2 at this concentration.
The following table gives the specific conductance of a solution of hydrochloric acid, to 100
ml of which have been added various amounts of an 8N solution of sodium hydroxide. If the
dilution effect of the small amount of hydroxide solution added is neglected, what is the
normality of the HCl solution?
NaOH [ml]
0,32
0,92
1,56
2,34
Conductance [S]
0,0322
0,0186
0,0164
0,0296
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Lodz University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Laboratory
of Chemistry
Download