School Climate and Bullying Denise C. Gottfredson, Ph.D. University of Maryland Presented at the Workshop on Increasing Capacity for Reducing Bullying and its Impact on the Lifecourse of Youth Involved Institute of Medicine and National Research Council April 9, 2014 What is “School Climate” Personality is to the individual what ‘climate’ is to the organization School Climate and Bullying-related Attitudes and Behaviors Students in schools with higher student/teacher ratios reported greater frequency of bully victimization and reduced perceptions of safety. 95 elementary and middle schools Source: Bradshaw, C.P., Sawyer, A.L., & O’Brennan, L.M. (2009). School Climate and Willingness to Seek Help Students in schools with high levels of perceived teacher and school staff support are more willing to seek help for bullying and aggressive behavior Ninth grade students from 291 Virginia High Schools Source: Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). School Climate and Bullying Students in schools with consistent enforcement of school discipline and availability of caring adults experienced lower levels of bullying and victimization Ninth grade students from 290 Virginia High Schools Source: Gregory, A., Cornell, D., Fan, X., Sheras, P., & Shih, T. (2010). School Climate and Victimization/ Delinquency -- Important Dimensions Student/teacher ratio, # different students taught Sense of community Discipline management Safe School Study 1976 national sample of 642 secondary schools Extensive data collection Principal, teacher, and student surveys Census data on the school communities Extensive questioning Victimization experiences, personal characteristics, and characteristics of schools Source: Gottfredson & Gottfredson, 1985 School Climate Predictors of Victimization: Safe School Study Large Schools with larger # of different students taught Ambiguous sanctions Low perception of firm and clear rule enforcement Higher School Victimization Source: Gottfredson & Gottfredson, 1985 Low perception of fairness and clarity of rules Punitive teacher attitudes National Study of Delinquency Prevention in Schools 1998 national sample of 1,287 schools Extensive data collection Principal, teacher, and student surveys Census data on the school communities Extensive questioning Victimization experiences, personal characteristics, and characteristics of schools Source: Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2005) School Climate Predictors of Victimization and Delinquency: NSDPS Structural Controls - % male students Social Climate - Concentrated poverty/AA - Size & Urbanicity - Residential Crowding - Grade Level Discipline Management Teacher Victimization Student Delinquency Student Victimization Source: Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., & Gottfredson, N. C. (2005) School Size and Student Victimization Structural Controls Student Enrollment _ Personal Victimization - Community Concentrated Disadvantage - Urbanicity/Mobility - Racial/Ethnic Student Composition - Average Student Age Student-Teacher + Ratio Number of Different + Students Taught Source: Gottfredson, D. C. and DiPietro, S. M. (2011) Property Victimization School Culture Mediates Effect Structural Controls - Community Concentrated Disadvantage - Urbanicity/Mobility - Racial/Ethnic Student Composition - Average Student Age Student/Teacher Ratio Consensus about Norms Personal Victimization Communal Social Organization (CSO) Schools in which “…members know, care about, and support one another, have common goals and sense of shared purpose, and…actively contribute and feel personally committed” (Solomon et al., 1997) Effects of CSO on Delinquent Behavior Structural Controls - Percent Students Male - Concentrated Poverty/AA - Size and Urbanicity Communal Social Organization Student Bonding - Residential Crowding - Grade Level Source: Payne, A.A., Gottfredson, D.C., and Gottfredson, G.D. (2003) Student Delinquency Lessons from School Shootings Ethnographic study of factors related to school shootings experienced in the 1990s. Teams of ethnographers worked in 6 different communities that had experienced lethal school shootings Interviewed people; collected records relevant to the incidents and what happened in their aftermaths. Source: National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2003) Characteristics of the Communities Gulf between youth culture and adults Shooters intensely concerned about status and protecting themselves Adults had poor understanding of children’s experiences Shooters felt there was “nowhere to turn” Specific warnings given and missed School Climate and Victimization/ Delinquency -- Important Dimensions Student/tchr ratio, # different students taught Sense of community Discipline management Can school climate be altered to reduce bullying? Of historical interest: 1980’s OJJDP “Alternative Education Initiative” Project STATUS Project PATHE Project STATUS Program Description: “school-within-a school;” integrated social studies and English class, including a law-related education curriculum and instructional methods emphasizing student participation, cooperative learning Participants: high risk students in grades 7 an 9 Implementer: school teachers Duration/Intensity: 1 school year, 2 hours per day Effect of Program: decreased crime (.36*) decreased anti-social behavior (.23) decreased substance use (.40*) Source: Gottfredson (1990) Project PATHE Program Description: comprehensive program to alter school organization and management structures; designed to reduce school disorder and improve the school environment to enhance students’ experiences and attitudes about school Participants: middle and high school students Implementer: school staff Duration/Intensity: 2 years (middle) or 1 year (high) Effect of Program: decreased crime (middle school=.31* / high school=.15*) decreased anti-social behavior (middle school=.16* / high school=.21*) decreased substance use (middle school=.33* / high school=.15*) Source: Gottfredson (1986, 1990) Safe Dates Program Description: School activities: theater production performed by peers, a 10-session curriculum, and a poster contest. Participants: middle/high school students Implementer: teachers Duration/Intensity: 10 45-50 minute sessions Effect of Program: 25% less psychological perpetration 60% less sexual violence perpetration 60% less violence perpetrated against a current dating partner Source: Foshee, V.A., Bauman, K.E., Ennett, S.T., Suchindran, C., Benefield, T., & Linder, G.F. (2005) Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Program Description: School team approach; Team establishes expectations for positive behaviors to encourage and reinforce; Positive reinforcement system; Discipline system: Clear rules, consistently enforced – emphasis on classroom management Participants: elementary schools Implementer: teachers and administrators Duration/Intensity: five years Effect of Program: Improved organizational health Reduced aggressive behavior (teacher reports) Reduced peer rejection (teacher reports) Source: Bradshaw CP, Koth CW, Bevans KB, Ialongo N, Leaf PJ (2008); Waasdorp, T.E., Bradshaw, C. P., and Leaf, P. J. (2012). School Climate and Delinquency -Important Dimensions Student/tchr ratio, # different students taught Sense of community Discipline management Gaps in Research Efforts to combine ideas from earlier and contemporary school climate research to design more potent school-wide bully prevention programs. Rigorous tests of the effects of these promising ideas on bullying (large RCTs at school level). Research on how the school climate influences the effectiveness of individually-targeted interventions such as SEL-type programs. Thank You! Denise C. Gottfredson Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice University of Maryland gott@umd.edu References Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. Sch Psychol Q. 23(4):462-473. doi:10.1037/a0012883. Bradshaw, C.P., Sawyer, A.L., & O’Brennan, L.M. (2009). A social disorganization perspective on bullying-related attitudes and behaviors: The influence of school context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43 (3-4), 204-220. Cook, P. J., Gottfredson, D. C, & Na, C. (2010). School Crime Control and Prevention. In Tonry, M. (ed). Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 533–553. References, Continued Foshee, V.A., Bauman, K.E., Ennett, S.T., Suchindran, C., Benefield, T., & Linder, G.F. (2005). Assessing the effects of dating violence prevention program "Safe Dates" using random coefficient regression modeling. Prevention Science, 6(3), 245-257. Gottfredson, D.C. (1986). An empirical test of school-based environmental and individual interventions to reduce the risk of delinquent behavior." Criminology , 24, 705-731. Gottfredson, D.C. (1990). “Changing school structures to benefit high risk youths.” in Understanding Troubled and Troubling Youth: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by P. E. Leone. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Gottfredson, D. C. and DiPietro, S. M. (2011). School Size, Social Capital, and Student Victimization Sociology of Education 84, 69-89 Gottfredson, D. C. & Gottfredson, G. D. (2002). Quality of School-Based Prevention Programs: Results from a National Survey. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 1, 3-35. References, Continued Gottfredson, G. D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (1985). Victimization in schools. New York: Plenum. Gottfredson, G. D., Gottfredson, D. C., Payne, A. A., and Gottfredson, N. C. (2005). School Climate Predictors of School Disorder: Results from the National Study of Delinquency Prevention in Schools. Jnl of Rsch in Crime and Delinquency, 42, (4), 412-444. Gregory, A., Cornell, D., Fan, X., Sheras, P., & Shih, T. (2010). Authoritative school discipline: High school practices associated with lower student bullying and victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 483-496. Klein, J., & Cornell, D. (2010). Is the link between large high schools and student victimization an illusion? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 933-946. doi: 10.1037/a0019896 National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2003) Deadly Lessons: Understanding Lethal School Violence. Case Studies of School Violence Committee. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. References, Continued Payne, A.A., Gottfredson, D.C., & Gottfredson, G.D. (2003). Schools as communities: The relationships among communal School organization, student bonding, and school disorder. Criminology, 41, 749-777. Solomon, D., Battistich, V., Kim, D., & Watson, M. (1997). Teacher practices associated with students' sense of the classroom as a community. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 235-267. Waasdorp, T.E., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2012). The impact of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer rejection: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 166(2),149-156. Project STEP Program Description: Redefines role of homeroom teacher to be more central in students’ lives; reorganizes classes so students stay with one set of classmates and small team of teachers for four periods Participants: middle school students transitioning to high school Implementer: school staff Duration/Intensity: 1 year Effect of Program: Increased GPA and attendance Increased perceptions of positive school environment (teacher support, affiliation, involvement) Long term follow-up showed decreased drop out rate (43% vs 24%) Source: Felner, Ginter and Primavera (1982); Felner and Adan (1988)