Campus Safety and Violence Coalition: Today’s Concerns Panel Members • • • • • • Lee Helmken Aimee Janssen-Robinson Beth Kotarski Rima Shah Kim Webb Mary A. Wyandt-Hiebert Defining sexual violence, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking Kim Webb, M.Ed. Director, Relationship and Sexual Violence Prevention Center Washington University, St. Louis Mary A. Wyandt-Hiebert, PhD, MCHES, CWHC Director STAR Central, University of Arkansas Where to begin: • Many are still left with questions regarding the issues of sex offenses, domestic violence, stalking, and dating violence. Campus SaVE Act (Section 304 of VAWA) • On March 7, 2013, President Obama signed the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA) (Pub. Law 113-4), which, among other provisions, amended section 485(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), otherwise known as the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act). SaVE Act defines Sex Offenses (e.g. rape, sexual assault, sexual battery, sexual abuse, sexual coercion, incest, statutory rape) • Any sexual act directed against another person, forcibly and/or against that person’s will • Or not forcibly or against the person’s will where the victim is incapable of giving consent. Title IX defines sexual violence • Sexual violence is a prohibited form of sexual harassment and includes physical sexual acts perpetrated against a person's will or where it would be apparent to a reasonable observer that a person is incapable of giving consent due to the victim's use of drugs and/or alcohol or due to an intellectual or other disability. Examples of Sexual Violence • Rape (non-consensual sexual contact with penetration) • Sexual assault (sexual contact without consent) • Sexual battery (unwanted form of contact with an intimate part of the body that is made for purposes of sexual arousal, sexual gratification) • Sexual abuse (Sexual abuse is unwanted sexual activity, with perpetrators using force, making threats or taking advantage of victims not able to give consent), and • Sexual coercion (Sexual coercion is the act of using pressure, alcohol or drugs, or force to have sexual contact with someone against his or her will and includes persistent attempts to have sexual contact with someone who has already refused)loveisrespect.org • The HEA defines the new crime categories of domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking in accordance with section 40002(a) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 as follows: The following definitions are taken directly from DCLID: GEN-1413, published on July 14, 2014 and can be found at http://www.ifap.ed.gov/dpcletters/GEN1413.html VAWA - “Domestic Violence” means a “felony or misdemeanor crime of violence committed by • a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim, • a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, • a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner, • a person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction receiving grant monies [under VAWA], or • any other person against an adult or youth victim who is protected from that person’s acts under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction.‖ Practically speaking: Relationship/Domestic Violence • Relationship abuse is a pattern of coercive and abusive (sometimes violent) tactics employed by one partner in a relationship to gain power and control over the other partner. • Other names: domestic violence, intimate partner violence VAWA - “Dating violence” means “violence committed by a person: Who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim; and where the existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on a consideration of the following factors: •the length of the relationship; •the type of relationship; and •the frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.‖ Practically speaking: Dating Violence • Dating abuse is actual or threatened abuse or violence committed by a person who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim. Warning signs of abusive behavior • Destructive criticism and verbal attacks (direct or indirect) • Pressure tactics or threats • Threat of harm to others (ie. children, pets, etc) • Emotional abuse or manipulation • Minimizing, denying and blaming • Harassment • Economic control • Isolation • Intimidation • Physical violence • Sexual violence VAWA - “Stalking” means “engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to - fear for his/her safety or the safety of others; or suffer substantial emotional distress ▪ ―Course of conduct‖ means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person or interferes with a person’s property. ▪ ―Reasonable person‖ means a reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the victim. ▪ ―Substantial emotional distress‖ means significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling. Stalking examples • Following, harassing, or threatening someone repeatedly • Telephoning and text messaging constantly • Waiting on someone outside or inside buildings, locations • Watching someone from afar • Sending unwanted letters or e-mails • Cyber-stalking Challenges with defining • Sex offenses and domestic violence are often well defined (e.g. state laws, Title IX, Clery, etc…) and defining them within campus policy is often dependent on existing and widely accepted definitions. • With vague definitions for dating violence and stalking from HEA, much is left up to institutions to define. Thus, the challenge is to define these offenses and to have supportive argument for institutional policy. Challenges to Action • Offer clear definitions and observable behaviors in training to all employees and students. Screening for Sexual Violence, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, & Stalking Kim Webb, M.Ed. Director, Relationship and Sexual Violence Prevention Center Washington University, St. Louis Mary Wyandt-Hiebert, PhD, MCHES, CWHC Director STAR Central, University of Arkansas Who can help outside of the classroom? • • • • • • Housekeeping Staff Dining Services Staff Residential Life Staff Coaching Staff Student Group Advisors Students What are we looking for? • • • • Any of the previously stated observable behavior Altered Mood Altered Appearance Uncharacteristic Behavior (Mattress thrown out window, isolated) • Partner seems to control decisions • Seemingly unwanted touching or behavior • Pushing, shoving, pinching, etc. Faculty, advisors, etc. • Dig deeper: – What are some common maladaptive coping mechanisms for sexual and domestic violence? • alcohol abuse, drug abuse • Other observable behaviors – Aggression toward others – Disengagement – Excessive absence Campus Safety Officials • Safety assessments • Greater Understanding – Coercion – Control – Fear – Minimization – Safety/Agency – Rationalization Student Health Services • Screening for providers: 1. Screen all of your patients for sexual violence 2. Ask direct questions in a non-judgmental way 3. Validate your patient’s response 4. Evaluate, educate and make referrals Student Health Services • Providers should avoid: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Asking patients about their victimization when other people are present Only asking patients who ―seem‖ like victims about their experiences Using the term ―rape,‖ as some survivors may not label their experience as rape (Pittsburgh Action Against Rape, 2007) Using formal, technical, or medical jargon (Stevens, 2007) Only asking about specific types of violence or recent violence (PCAR, 2005) Expressing value judgments Screening Tools – Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS) - Five items that assess physical, sexual, and emotional abuse. – Screening Tools-Sexual Assault - Five items that assess sexual assault and knowledge of risk reduction strategies. – Sexual and Physical Abuse History Questionnaire - Six of the items in this scale assess sexual abuse. – Two-Question Screening Tool - One of two items assesses sexual violence. – Universal Violence Prevention Screening Protocol - Five items that assess recent physical, sexual, and emotional abuse. – Victimization Assessment Tool - Five items that assess a variety of kinds of violence, including sexual violence Screening Tools • Trauma Screening Tools: – Life Event Checklist (LEC) – PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) Who is Responsible? • Title IX definition of responsible employee: – Any employee: (a) who has the authority to take action to redress sexual harassment/misconduct; (b) who has been given the duty of reporting incidents of sexual harassment/misconduct or any other misconduct by students to the Title IX coordinator or other appropriate designee; or (c) who a student reasonably believes has this authority or duty. How do you help? • Know the resources available on your campus and in your community • Do not compromise one’s safety by asking questions in front of someone • Respect person’s choices and decisions • Share resources when appropriate • Share information with appropriate officials Essential Resources for Addressing Victimization Aimee Janssen-Robinson, M.Ed., CHES Assistant Dean of Students for Student Advocacy Indiana State University Responsible Employees • The Title IX Coordinator will annually notify those who are considered Responsible Employees under this policy. All Responsible Employees receiving reports of a potential violation of this policy must promptly contact the Title IX Coordinator. April 2011 Dear Colleague Letter Department of Educations Questions and Answers on Title IX and Sexual Violence Team Approach • Campus • Community Resources • Collaboration SANE Services • Campus • Community Marketing Services • It’s On Blue App – Students – Responsible Employees Building Transparency & Collaboration to Create a Culture of Caring Beth Kotarski, MSN, CRNP Director of University Health Services Carnegie Mellon University Rima Shah, MPH, MA Sexual Health & Violence Prevention Specialist Office of Health Promotion & Wellness DePaul University Creating a Climate of Care • ―Safety‖ is a loaded term. With regard to interpersonal violence, the work should focus on looking to intentional design of safe climates. • Creation of a climate of care—empathy building—makes all aspects of campus life safer. Health and Wellness Services are poised to take the lead in helping to create change. Incorporating Campus SaVE into the process • Primary prevention and awareness for new community members :―who we are as a community.‖ (empathy) • Safe options for bystander intervention ―what we do as a community.‖ (empathy) • Information on risk reduction ―how can I help as a member of the community?‖ • Ongoing prevention and awareness programs for students and faculty ―what are we missing?‖ Avoiding the Pitfalls • Students (and staff) can have ―checklist‖ mentality around ―training‖. Clarify ―training vs education vs ongoing awareness programming. • Climate change is pervasive and ongoing—not discreet. Online training and brief follow up is checklist mentality. • Health and Wellness departments should emphasize there is no real end point to conversations. What worked for us • Mix methods--fluid programming • Providing resources that responded fluidly on the continuum: • Rape crisis, MOU’s when necessary, education of identified groups, awareness days, big ticket guest speakers and follow up evaluation. • Looking at online ―check the box‖ with a critical eye. Campus Environment How do you create an environment that effectively addresses these forms of violence? Allow students to actively participate in creation of programs – so they are reflective of their needs and inclusive Demonstrate admin transparency and care Spread prevention messages Raise awareness about resources and programs available Collaborate, collaborate, collaborate! Two Successful Examples from DePaul 1. SLATE (Student Leaders Advocating Together for Empowerment) 2. Letter to parents/guardians encouraging family dialogue around consent and respect 1. SLATE What? •Student Leaders Advocating Together for Empowerment •Created late 2014 •Comprises of 22 diverse student leaders •Brings together student leaders with a demonstrated commitment to sexual and relationship violence prevention & survivor support 1. SLATE Includes students from: Office of Multicultural Student Success LGBTQA Student Services Residential Life Women’s Center Department of Women’s and Gender Studies Athletics Theater School Student Government Greek Life Feminist Front Peer Health Exchange Vagina Monologues 1. SLATE Why? •Bridge the gap – so all constituencies are aware of programs offered •Create a space – where students can share ideas and concerns •Create stronger, better attended, more impactful programs together •Build trust and transparency What has success looked like so far? •Growing membership •Increased attendance at events •Increased access of survivor support services •Student Conduct Process Input •Successful Consent Tagline Competition! 2. Letter to Parents/Guardians What? •Letter in all new student orientation folders •Encourages family dialogue around making responsible choices and ensuring consent prior to any sexual activity •Initiated in 2012 2. Letter to Parents/Guardians Why? •High prevalence – admin cannot do this alone! •An additional way to spread prevention messages and information about resources available •Opportunity to demonstrate care and transparency •Opportunity to stress Take Care DePaul philosophy What has success looked like so far? •Increased conversations between students and their parents around these issues •Parents actively reaching out to learn additional ways they can educate and support their students Building a Community Approach to Prevention Lee Helmken, MPH, CHES Health Educator, Health Promotion Georgia Institute of Technology Overview of VOICE • Georgia Tech’s sexual violence prevention and response initiative. • Led by the Women’s Resource Center and Health Promotion. • Vision: Everyone has the right to live and learn and Georgia Tech, free of violence or the threat of violence. • Mission: To create a campus culture that encourages respect, communication, and equity among the Georgia Tech community. Violence as a Public Health Issue http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/publichealthapproach.html Guiding Frameworks • Social Ecological Model • Primary Prevention vs. Risk Reduction Image Source: White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault, April 2014 Keys to Effective Prevention 1. Engage the majority of our community. 2. Shift campus norms around consent and bystander intervention. 3. Create a survivor-supportive campus community. Adapted from Office of Violence Against Women (OVW) Campus Technical Assistance & Resource Project – Training Institute, June 2014 1. Engage Campus Stakeholders Sexual Violence Prevention Alliance • • • • • Athletic Association Christian Campus Fellowship Counseling Center Department of Housing Faculty: School of History, Technology & Society and International Affairs • Georgia Tech Police Department • Local Rape Crisis Center • Greek Affairs • • • • • • • • Health Promotion Health Services Legal Affairs Office of Human Resources Office of Student Integrity Office of Minority Education Parking & Transportation Student Government Association • Title IX/Office of Compliance • Women’s Resource Center Key Programs/Services • Education/Community Engagement: – – – – – – – – – New Student Orientation Online Education Health Classes Greek Trainings (Safe Sister & Fraternity Men Against Violence) Athletics Trainings Open Bystander Intervention Trainings Key staff departments (Housing, Police, Counseling, etc.) Gold Folder Initiative: all faculty and staff And more! • Advocacy & Support Services for Survivors • Student Groups – Peer Education Program – PAUSE Student Organization – SGA Student Advisory Board 2. Shift Community Norms 3. Create a Culture of Support Working Towards Prevention Make our topic inclusive and approachable Implement programming/ intervention Culture & Behavior Shift Violence Prevention Adapted from Office of Violence Against Women (OVW) Campus Technical Assistance & Resource Project – Training Institute, June 2014 Rape Culture Denigration of Women Hyper-masculinity Calloused Sexual Attitudes Sexism Adapted from D. Lisak Moving Beyond Checking Boxes • This is an exciting, yet challenging time to be doing this work! • It is critical that we aren’t only focused on compliance or mandates • There is no quick fix or simple solution • Implement comprehensive community-level approaches that integrate prevention & traumainformed response • Break down silos across health topics and departments/divisions Future Directions • Continue to establish the role and expertise of college health in the national landscape • Support each other to sustain this work and build the field This year the Safety & Violence Coalition wants to hear from you! What are you doing on your campus? Discussion Resources • http://www.acha.org/Topics/violence.cfm • http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/clinicalpractice/life-event-checklist-lec.pdf • http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/clinicalpractice/SAMSA_TIP_Trauma.pdf • https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/de ar_colleague_sexual_violence.pdf • http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/qa -201404-title-ix.pdf • http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/ publichealthapproach.html