Improving the accuracy of EMI emissions testing James Young Rohde & Schwarz Q&A Who uses what for EMI? ⇒ Spectrum Analyzers (SA) ⇒ Test Receivers (TR) CISPR, MIL-STD or Automotive? Software or front panel ? Novice, Capable, Fluent or Expert ? Overview EMI Equipment comparison ⇒ Spectrum Analyzers (SA) ⇒ Test Receivers (TR) Making accurate measurements ⇒ RF / IF overload and Preselection ⇒ EMI Detectors and Filters ⇒ Preamps, where and when Spectrum Analyzers for EMI Spectrum Analyzers for EMI Level [dBµV] 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 30M 50M 70M 100M 200M 300M 500M 700M 1G SA setup for EMI Example - Set Start freq, stop freq, RBW and detector from standard - Span of 1G-30MHz = 970 MHz / 1000 = 1 MHz resolution - x samples in RBW are stored, 500 or 1000 are displayed - samples within RBW analyzed or weighted by the detector - QP “integrates” voltage in RBW, applies CISPR weighting Spectrum Analyzers for EMI Question - What was wrong with the previous setup? 30M 50M 70M 100M 200M 300M 500M 700M 1G Answer - Frequency and amplitude accuracy depend on many samples falling within each measurement bin (also called display pixel). - Next “bin” will be 1 MHz away (nearly 10 x 120 kHz)! - Frequency resolution much too course for EMI - Solution? Spectrum Analyzers for EMI Level [dBµV] 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 -20 30M 50M 70M 100M 200M 300M 500M Example Revisited - Span of 970 MHz / 1001 = 1 MHz resolution - If using 120 KHz RBW, CISPR recommends 60 KHz “bin” points (17 x finer than 1 MHz) - Solution: subrange in the span 700M 1G Spectrum Analyzers for EMI Frequency Accuracy of SA - SA frequency resolution is far too course for EMI without sub-ranging the CISPR span - SA frequency accuracy when exploring peaks influenced by Span, RBW, VBW, marker accuracy Amplitude Accuracy of SA - 6 dB (EMI) filters QP and AVE detector times are observed Data correction for system transducers EUT specific timing issues are considered Subranges set properly for sample # RF and IF stages are not overloaded Spectrum Analyzers for EMI Conclusion ⇒ SA lacks 2 control parameters for EMI - STEP SIZE between measurement bins - DWELL TIME at each measurement bin - Lacks dynamic range and overload protection (later slides) ⇒ Sub-ranging and zero span is an attempt to make SA measure like TR Test Receivers for EMI Test Receivers for EMI Receivers for EMI - Frequency Span (start / stop) - RBW Filter and detector - DWELL TIME at each measurement point - FREQUENCY INCRIMENT (step size independent of RBW) - TR adjusts sample x and bins depending on span - x is often 16,000 – 100,000+ - Span / x = frequency resolution Sample Points Example 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 30M 50M 70M 100M 200M 300M 500M 700M 1G Level [dBµV] 57.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 79.94M 85M 90M 95M Frequency [Hz] 100M 109.63M Example: TR (green) vs. SA (blue) sample points Samples and Bins samples Freq error RBW RBW Integration of samples Peak Lost detector Peak detector peak peak QP QP Ave Ave RMS RMS Display BIN • • Bin amplitude is detector value, Bin freq is reported in center SA has 1001 bins, TR accesses 100,000 bins (from memory) QP Display BIN Receiver Measurements • CISPR 16 recommends Step size ≤ RBW / 2 Frequency Range 6-dB Bandwidth 150 kHz to 30 MHz 9 kHz 4 kHz 7,463 30 MHz to 1 GHz 120 KHz 50 KHz 19,400 Step Size (<1/2 RBW) # of meas Bins VS 80M 85M 90M 95M Frequency [Hz] 100M 110M Test Receivers for EMI Conclusion ⇒ TR incorporates EMI control parameters - STEP SIZE between measurement bin - DWELL TIME at each measurement bin - # of measurement bins as necessary for accuracy Time Penalty ? - Time dependant on detector and EUT, not measurement speed of instruments Best Instrument for EMI? Pros and Cons of Each - SA is faster for initial preview - SA can also be used for RX and TX measurements - TR has little little use use outside outside EMI, EMI, expensive expensive unit for one use - SA sub-ranging negates any speed advantage over TR for EMI - SA frequency / amplitude accuracy easily skewed by improper settings and interpretation Which one to use? Use SA or TR to develop “hit list” Use SA or TR for maximization Att 30 dB AUTO FREQUENCY LEVEL QPK 10 dBµV 20 100 MHz 60 200 MHz 30 300 MHz RBW 120 kHz MT 1 s PREAMP ON 931.9200000 MHz dBµV 40 400 MHz 50 500 MHz 60 600 MHz 70 700 MHz 800 MHz 80 90 900 MHz 50 FCC15RB 1 PK CLRWR SGL 40 30 20 10 TR is optimum for final (dwell time, step size and auto attenuator) 0 -10 -20 30 MHz Date: 1 GHz 8.SEP.2003 14:13:12 Making accurate measurements Overload protection Detectors for EMI RBW Filters for EMI Preamps Accurate Measurement Dynamic range of SA / TR is ~160 dB 160 dB = 10e8 or 8 orders of magnitude EMC engineers don’t know what signals they are looking for initially Accuracy killers - Overloads (RF and IF) - Incorrect detector settings - Preamplifiers improperly used - Improper RBWs RF Overdrive RF: Watch for harmonics of large signals - Use attenuator to set mixer input level Max Input Level Ref Level RF Attenuation sets mixer input level 1st mixer Input Mixer Level RF Overload Example MARKER 1 496 MHz Ref 0 dBm 1 * Att RBW 3 MHz VBW 10 MHz SWT 10 ms 10 dB 0 Marker 2 [T1 ] -48.80 996.000000000 Marker 3 [T1 ] -48.60 1.500000000 -10 1 SA AVG Marker 1 [T1 ] 3.03 dBm 496.000000000 MHz -20 dBm MHz dBm GHz -30 -40 2 3 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 Center 1 GHz Date: 23.JUN.2004 200 MHz/ 20:33:37 Example: amplified signal at 500 MHz Span 2 GHz A IF Overdrive IF: Watch for overload flags - Use Ref Level to set IF Gain Ref Level - Set IF gain using “ref Level” Ref Level sets IF Gain IF Gain 1st mixer Input Mixer Level IF Overload Example RF ATTENUATION 10 dB Ref 0 dBm * Att 10 dB 1 RBW 3 MHz VBW 10 MHz SWT 5 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] 6.13 dBm 502.053410569 MHz 0 OVLD 1 AP CLRWR A -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 Center 502.0534106 MHz Date: 23.JUN.2004 99.02160153 MHz/ 20:55:20 Example: +6 dBm Pulse Span 990.2160153 MHz Preselection Filtering Preselector is a “tracking” RF filter - ALL RF power (noise & signals) go into mixer - high amplitude signals outside displayed span can influence amplitude and may be aliased Cure: preselect filtering of signals before RF or IF - SA may not warn of RF or IF overdrive - IF overload won’t show on display - Signals outside display ruin amplitude reading Preselection Simple Mixer stage Pre-selection V (f) V(f) B2 B1 f Overdrive and Preselection MARKER 1 1.000272533 Ref 0 dBm GHz * Att 20 dB RBW VBW SWT 3 MHz 10 MHz 10 ms 0 Marker [T1 ] -43.41 1.000272533 Marker [T1 ] -54.36 1.501204189 -10 1 PK * CLRWR 1 dBm GHz 2 dBm GHz -20 -30 -40 1 -50 2 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 Start Date: 400 MHz 8.SEP.2003 141.6135906 MHz/ Stop 1.816135906 GHz 13:03:46 Example: +10 dBm signal at 500 MHz causing overdrive A Overdrive and Preselection START FREQUENCY 600 MHz Ref 0 dBm * Att 20 dB RBW VBW SWT 3 MHz 10 MHz 10 ms 0 Marker [T1 ] -43.41 1.000272533 Marker [T1 ] -54.58 1.501204189 -10 1 PK * CLRWR 1 dBm GHz 2 dBm GHz A -20 -30 -40 1 -50 2 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 Start Date: 600 MHz 8.SEP.2003 121.6135906 MHz/ Stop 1.816135906 GHz 13:04:13 Example2: Moving overload off screen won’t clear overload Overdrive and Preselection MARKERFREQUENCY START 1 1.000272533 600 MHz Ref 0 dBm GHz * Att 20 dB RBW VBW SWT 3 MHz 10 MHz 10 ms 0 Marker [T1 ] -43.41 -62.14 1.000272533 Marker [T1 ] -54.36 -54.58 -63.57 1.501204189 -10 1 PK * CLRWR 1 dBm GHz 2 dBm GHz A -20 -30 -40 1 PS 1 -50 2 1 -60 2 2 -70 -80 -90 -100 Start Date: 400 600 MHz 8.SEP.2003 141.6135906 121.6135906 MHz/ Stop 1.816135906 GHz 13:04:47 13:03:46 13:04:13 Example3: Example3: Activating Activating Preselector Preselector clears clears overload overload by by filtering filtering the the fundamental fundamental PRF, Dwell time and Detectors EUT / Detector dwell time requirements - Must capture “worst case” emissions of EUT - Cycle time, modulation, and pulse repetition frequency may require extended dwell in each subrange (QP,AVE, RMS) - Test Receivers include this parameter -Since tuning each bin, can dwell as long as necessary - Spectrum Analyzers have a workaround -Zero Span is a way to trick SA into dwelling at tuned bin -Must do calculation since overall sweep time is controlled -Dwell time = sweep time / measurement bins Detector Settings Quasipeak ???? ⇒ QP is an attempt to quantify a signals Impact on a radio receiver (annoyance) - Factors: amplitude, frequency, pulse repetition frequency Quasipeak restrictions - Dwell time (per step or subrange) at least 1 second - PRF issues increase dwell time requirements Detector Settings Peak Detector - Peak gives “worst case” - Safest detector: Often fast enough to see most signals even if instrument settings are not “optimum” Average or RMS Detector - Average detector used above 1 GHz for FCC and CE tests - RMS for ultra wide band, dwell time critical for integration - dwell for at least 100 mS at each bin for proper integration - Watch RBW (1MHz or 120 KHz above 1GHz?) Detector Settings Example Ref -20 dBm Att 10 RBW VBW SWT dB 120 kHz 1 MHz 175 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] -49.64 280.000000000 dBm MHz -20 A -30 1 RM * CLRWR -40 1 -50 -60 -70 -80 -90 -100 -110 -120 Start Date: 0 Hz 23.JUN.2004 50 MHz/ Stop 500 MHz 21:44:15 Example: -40 dBm signal at 280 MHz measures with RMS Detector Settings Example Ref -20 dBm Att 10 RBW VBW SWT dB 120 kHz 1 MHz 175 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] -56.89 -49.64 280.000000000 dBm MHz -20 A A -30 -30 1 1 AV RM * * CLRWR CLRWR -40 -40 1 -50 -50 1 -60 -60 -70 -70 -80 -80 -90 -90 -100 -100 -110 -110 -120 -120 Start Start Date: Date: 0 0 Hz Hz 23.JUN.2004 23.JUN.2004 50 50 MHz/ MHz/ Stop Stop 500 500 MHz MHz 21:44:41 21:44:15 Example2: Same -40 dBm but with Ave and same settings Detector Settings Example Ref -20 dBm Att 10 RBW VBW SWT dB 120 kHz 1 MHz 175 ms Marker 1 [T1 ] -56.89 -76.57 -49.64 280.000000000 dBm MHz -20 A A -30 -30 1 AV 1 QP RM * * CLRWR CLRWR -40 -40 1 -50 -50 1 -60 -60 -70 -70 1 -80 -80 -90 -90 -100 -100 -110 -110 -120 -120 Start Start Date: Date: 0 0 Hz Hz 23.JUN.2004 23.JUN.2004 50 50 MHz/ MHz/ Stop Stop 500 500 MHz MHz 21:45:04 21:44:41 21:44:15 Example3: Same -40 dBm but with QP and same settings Transducers and PRF Transducer correction - CISPR needed a way to eliminate effects of variability in chambers, antennas and cable losses - Standards require normalization of these effects to compare results to limit line - Chamber ruled by Normalized Site Attenuation (NSA) - Transducers and connections used correction factors derived from actual calibrations Resolution Bandwidth Filters Ref Lvl 9 7 d B ÌV RBW VBW SWT 100 kHz 10 MHz 5 ms RF Att Uni t 20 dB d B ÌV 97 A 90 3dB RBW 80 70 60 6dB RBW I N1 1 MA 2 MA 1M A X 2V I EW 50 40 30 20 10 0 -3 Center 100 MHz 100 kHz/ Span 1 MHz Preamps Preamps: When are they needed? - Generally needed above 7 GHz - Below 7 GHz ONLY if stringent limit line or long cables Preamps: Where to put them? - Preamps amplify signal and noise - Real Real goal goal of of preamp preamp is is PRESERVE PRESERVE signal to noise ratio (best at the antenna) antenna) - Low level signals require amplification at antenna, before signal is subjected to path loss of cables Preamps Preamp S/N Ratio example S N S N S N Preamp near EMI receiver Common Cables loss ½ dB per meter at 1GHz S N 3 dB per meter at 40 GHz Preamp at antenna S N S N Preamps Preamps - Noise Figure equation states the 1st gain/loss encountered has the most impact on s/n ratio - Must have high gain & low noise figure (amp contributed noise) - 1-18 GHz gain around 30 dB with NF of 3.2 dB or less - 18-26 GHz gain around 35 dB with NF of 3.0 dB or less - 26-40 GHz gain around 50 dB with NF of 2.8 dB or less Noise contributed by preamp (NF) S N RF Thermal Noise (N0) Preamps Know your Preamp overload range and behavior - Must keep preamp in linear region - Know the preamp range (what is the max signal input without compression or damage) - Watch RF input levels to 1stst mixer system check if unsure (variable attenuator) - Non-wave guide guide antennas have a direct connection to the FET, watch static discharge Preamps Conclusion TR vs. SA Span Subranges step size resolution dwell time overloading preselection RF & IF Overloads RF -> Harmonics Attenuator IF -> If overload flag Ref Level Preamps amplify at antenna know linear region system check (attenuator) static below 1gz