Ultra Shallow Junction Formation Technology and Trends

advertisement
Front End Products Group
Equipment Supplier’s Perspective on
the Evolution of Si Technology
Development
Gregg S. Higashi, Ph.D.
CTO & Co-Director of the Applications
Development Center
Front End Products Group
May 2005
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
2
1998: Unit Process Physical Results
RTP’98
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
3
2003: Transistor Electrical Results
Low-energy Nitrogen Plasmas for 65-nm node Oxynitride Gate Dielectrics:
A Correlation of Plasma Characteristics and Device Parameters
P.A. Kraus1, K. Ahmed1, T.C. Chua1, M. Ershov2, H. Karbasi2, C.S. Olsen1, F. Nouri1, J. Holland1, R. Zhao1, G.
Miner1 and A. Lepert1
1
Applied Materials, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.
2
PDF Solutions, Inc., San Jose, CA, U.S.A.
Phone 408-563-6363, Fax 408-563-4884, E-mail philip_kraus@amat.com
Abstract
Norm. Electron Density (a.u.)
Ultra-thin oxynitride gate dielectrics (EOT 1.1 to 1.2 nm) have been prepared using quasi-remote inductively coupled nitrogen plasmas. A correlation has been
established, for the first time, between device characteristics and measurements of the nitrogen plasma characteristics. It is found that reducing the density of high-energy
electrons in the plasma results in 5% improved electron and hole low-field mobilities and 100% improved NBTI reliability. These improvements in plasma nitridation
technology enable the extension of oxynitride gate dielectrics to the 65-nm technology node specifications. (Keywords: plasma nitridation, oxynitride gate dielectric,
1.0
electron temperature, effective carrier mobility, NBTI)
1750
5 mT
0.8
pRF
CW
1700
Vg= -1.6V
dIdsat (%)
nMOS Gmax*Tinv (a.u.)
10
Introduction
It is likely that0.6fundamental and integration difficulties will prevent
high-κ dielectrics from becoming adopted for 65-nm nodeT=105C
CMOS manufacturing [1]. It is therefore
1650
necessary to extend plasma
nitridation to the 65-nm node, as has been recently reported [2-5]. Gate leakage and EOT specifications will require superior N profile
pRF
1600
0.4
control in the gate
dielectric because effective carrier mobility and NBTI lifetime can be degraded with increasing N concentrations or proximity of N to the channel [2Vg= -1.2V
20 mT
1550
6]. Minimizing these
degradations is then
a requirement for advanced
gate oxide nitridation processes.
0.2
+
Fig. 1 is a simulation of N2 ion implantation into 1 nm of SiO2 on
Si at ionpRF
energies of 10, 20, and 30 eV; both N profile1and the amount of N implanted into the Si
1500
CW
channel are dependent
on the ion energy. While this simulation does CW
not take into account chemistry or diffusion, it illustrates the importance of the ion
0.0
1450
0
200
400formation.
600
800
kinetic energy in gate
dielectric
An ion striking the surface
of the wafer has kinetic energy proportional to the electron temperature (kTe), which describes
10
12
14
16
Effective
Power (W)
the Maxwellian distribution
of electron
energies in the plasma [7]. A reduction
in kTe will cause
a reduction in the mean energy of the nitrogen ions (Eion) striking the
Nitrogen Concentration
(at. %)
Stress time (a.u.)
wafer surface. Simulations
pulsed (turning the source power on Nitrogen
and off at kHz content
frequencies) Ar
plasmas have been shown to have
reduced condition
time-averaged kT
Plasma
impact
Plasmaofelectron
impact
e relative
to continuous wave
(non-pulsed)
plasmas
[8].
Here,
we
report
for
the
first
time
the
use
of
pulsed
nitrogen
plasmas
for
an
abrupt
N
profile
and
hence
improved
n- and
on device NBTI
energy vs. Power
on channel mobility
pMOS device performance and reliability, and the characterization of these plasmas.
VLSI’03
Measurements show Pulsed RF Plasma reduces electron
temperature. Improved device performance and NBTI
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
4
IBM says, “Classical CMOS Scaling is Dead”
1000
Scaled Device
Voltage, V / α
WIRING
T ox (C )
100
tox/α
W/α
GATE
n+
source
n+
drain
10
classic scaling
L/α
p substrate, doping α*NA
Vdd (V)
xd/α
1
RESULTS:
SCALING:
Higher Density:
Scaling factor: α
Higher Speed:
Voltage:
V/α
Oxide:
tox /α Power/ckt:
Power Density:
Wire width: W/α
Gate width: L/α
Diffusion:
xd /α
Substrate:
α * NA
~α2
~α
~1/α2
~Constant
0.1
0.01
Vt (V)
0.1
1
Gate Length, Lgate (um)
Why deviate from "ideal" scaling?
• unacceptable gate leakage/reliability
• additional performance at higher voltages
B. Meyerson, IBM, Semico Conf., January 2004, Taiwan.
What‘s the consequence of this deviation?
• a dramatic rise in power density
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
5
IBM says, “There’s a Power Crisis in CMOS”
1E+03
Active Power Density
1E+02
Power (W/cm2)
Leff and Vdd trends result in:
• Active Power Density growth
~1.3X/generation
• Passive Power Density growth
~3X/generation
• Gate Leakage Power Density
>4X/generation`
1E+01
1E+00
1E-01
1E-02
1E-03
1E-04
1E-05
0.01
Standby Power Density
0.1
Gate Length (µm)
The CMOS Power Crisis:
Simple scaling is no longer an option, as we have hit a “power cliff”
B. Meyerson, IBM, Semico Conf., January 2004, Taiwan.
Applied Materials External Use
1
Front End Products Group
6
Implications of Power Crisis
ƒ New materials will be introduced
– Plasma Nitrided Gate Dielectric
– High-k Gate Dielectric
– Metal Gate
ƒ New processes will be introduced
– Co-implantation of species to suppress diffusion
– Diffusion free annealing processes
– High-tilt high current implantation
ƒ Processed induced strained silicon will be adopted
– SiN overlayers
– Recessed SiGe source/drain extensions
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
7
Gate Stack Opportunities
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
8
More Detailed Look at Gate Stack
Gate Stack Bias Causes:
Inversion layer to form in Si under the
gate oxide.
Small depletion layer to form in poly-Si
electrode
Gate
EOT
CET or Tox Inversion
Well
Capacitance Equivalent Thickness (CET):
Capacitance in inversion is the true
metric governing device performance.
Q = CV
This inversion capacitance translated
into equivalent oxide thickness as CET or
Tox inversion.
CET/Tox Inversion Governs Transistor Drive Current
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
9
Gate Capacitor Considerations
C = kε0A/t
k = dielectric constant
ε0 = permittivity of free space
A = capacitor area
t = thickness of capacitor
1/Cinversion = 1/Cdielectric + 1/Cinversion layer + 1/Cpoly depletion
Assuming equal k’s:
CET = EOT + tinversion layer + tpoly depletion
CET
Jg-reduction
tdielectric
EOT
tinv. layer
tpoly depl. Technology
20Å
1x
12Å
12Å
4Å
4Å
Oxide/Poly
20Å
10x
12Å
12Å
4Å
4Å
Oxinitride/Poly
20Å
10,000x
30Å
12Å
4Å
4Å
Hi-k/Poly
16Å
10,000x
30Å
12Å
4Å
0Å
Hi-k/Metal Gate
Industry driving toward high-k and metal gates
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
10
Plasma Nitrided Gate Stack: Scaling to 65nm
1,000
Jg atVg=1v (A/cm2)
65nm HP Req
100
High
Performance
10
SiO2
1
65nm LOP Req
RTNO
Low Operating
Power
0
0.1xSiO2
0
10
12
14
16
18
EOT (Å)
DPN gate nitridation meets 65nm HP and LOP device requirements.
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
11
Gate Dielectric Leakage Reduction
with High-k/Metal Gate
ITRS Roadmap
45nm
EOT (Å)
8
Poly depletion + QM (Å)
4
Gate Leakage (A/cm2)
2,000
Gate Leakage Reduction
1e+5
1e+4
Device Cross-Section
SiO2
1e+3
Jg(Vg=Vfb-1) (A/cm2)
Poly
D
HfSiOx
(40Å)
1e+2
1e+1
1e+0
1e-1
1e-2
1e-3
1e-4
Process B
Process A
1e-5
Si
1e-6
Gate: Ta/TaN
1e-7
5
6
7
8
9
Applied Materials External Use
10 11
EOT
12
13
14
15
Front End Products Group
12
45nm Gate Stack Technology Landscape
Substrate
Gate Stack
Structure
Surface
Channel
Bulk
PD-SOI
Dielec.
WF
Requirement
Materials
P+: W, Ru, IrO2, TiAlN
N+: Ta/Si/N, Al
SiON
or
HiK
Band Edge
Dual metal
~ N+ & P+
Buried
Channel
Alloy:Ti/N, Ta/N, TaSiN
Silicide: NiSi, CoSi
SOI
FD-SOI
SiON
or
HiK
FinFET
TriGate
Applied Materials External Use
MidGap
Dual metal
~ mid gap
Front End Products Group
13
Ultra-Shallow Junction
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
14
Device Scaling and Doping Drivers
Key Parameters for Transistor Improvement
• Speed: Ion/Idsat : Increase
Resistance : Rs : Decrease
Higher Doses
Higher Anneal Temp.
• Leakage: Ioff : Reduce
Junction Depth: Xj : Decrease
Lower Implant Energies
Shorter Anneal Time
Gate Length: Requirement = smaller
Physical gate length. Typically, Lg is smaller than design rule
(technology node).
Lg
Contact/Extension/Channel Resistance: Requirement = lower
Reducing resistance in Contact/Extension/Channel path
Increases conductance and raises switching speed
Gate
Source
Ext
Ext
Xj
EOT
Drain
Lch
Channel Length: Requirement = smaller
Effective gate length, which is smaller than Lg.
Junction Depth: Requirement = shallower
As channel length decreases, electric field interaction
results in leakage from Drain to Source when transistor
is Off (Short Channel Effect – SCE).
Shallower Xj reduces SCE leakage
Scaling Challenges Implant and Anneal Systems
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
15
Technology Curve for Current PTORs and Process
ƒ Boron TED is a
10000
limiting factor to USJ
formation
of B in Si and fast
diffusion of B must
be overcome
ƒ Shallow and Abrupt
implant profiles
required
ƒ Productivity is
challenge for USJ
doping
- lower energies
- higher doses
- additional implants
Sheet Resistance (ohms/sq)
ƒ Solid solubility limit
Low Energy Implant and
Spike Anneal
1000
65nm
90nm
130nm
Need to push to lower Xj/Rs
to meet requirements
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Junction Depth (A)
Current Generation tools and typical low energy implant/spike anneal
process do not meet ITRS requirements
Applied Materials External Use
600
Front End Products Group
16
Technology Curves for Shallow Junctions
Key Metrics/trend
10000
Challenges
Implant
Productivity
Minimizing
diffusion during
activation step
Sheet Resistance (ohms/sq)
Xj
Rs
Abruptness
Quantum/Radiance
1000
65nm
90nm
Quantum III and
Radiance Plus
with LE Ge PAI
and F
130nm
Overlap formation
without diffusion
Channel Strain
Tailoring
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Junction Depth (A)
Process and hardware improvements extend Quantum and Radiance to 90nm
Applied Materials External Use
600
Front End Products Group
17
65nm USJ: Carbon Co-Implant + Spike Anneal
Partnership with IMEC
SIMS B 0.5KeV 7E14 cm-2
1E+21
D03: Ge+F+B
D12: Ge+C+B
D04: Si+F+B
D14: Si+C+B
Concentration (cm-3)
D09: C+B
1E+20
D05: In+B
1E+19
In
Si+C
Ge+C
C
Ge+F
Si+F
1E+18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Depth (nm)
ƒ Junction depth and abruptness improved with C co-implant
Quantum X + RadiancePlus
extend to meet customers’ 65nm requirements.
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
18
Millisecond Anneal Capability for 65nm USJ
10000
1E+22
Millisec Anneal
500 Ω/sq.
Rs
(Ω/sq)
Radiance
Spike
Anneal
Millisec
Anneal
1E+21
[B]
Higher
Activation
-3
(cm )
1E+20
1000
ITRS
45nm
ITRS
ITRS
65nm
90nm
1E+19
1E+18
Reduced
Diffusion
As Implanted
Ge 5keV, 1E15/cm2
B 0.5keV, 1E15/cm2
0
100
100
Radiance
1050°C Spike
380 Ω/sq.
200
300
400
Depth (Å)
50
150
250
350
450
550
Xj @ 1E18 /cm3 (Å)
Tech. Node
90nm
Rs <660Ω/sq
Xj
<250Å
Abruptness 4.1nm/dec
Technology
Spike
spike
65nm
45nm
30nm
<760Ω/sq
<170Å
2.8nm/dec
830Ω/sq
<100Å
2.0nm/dec
940Ω/sq
<70Å
1.4nm/dec
transition
Advanced
Advanced
Advanced Annealing Potential:
ƒ Preserves as-implanted profile with <25Å
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
diffusion
High activation due to peak temp ~1200°C
High throughput (>40 wph/chamber)
Lower total power required than Radiance
Activation without Diffusion will extend USJ to the 45nm node
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
19
Technology Curves for Shallow Junctions
Key Metrics/trend
10000
Challenges
Implant
Productivity
Minimizing
diffusion during
activation step
Sheet Resistance (ohms/sq)
XJ
Rs
Abruptness
Quantum/Radiance
Quantum X and
Advanced Anneal
1000
65nm
90nm
Overlap formation
without diffusion
Channel Strain
Tailoring
Quantum III and
Radiance Plus
with F co-implant
130nm
Quantum X and
Radiance Plus
with C co-implant
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Junction Depth (A)
Process and hardware improvements extend Quantum and Radiance to 90nm
New technology development enables Xj/Rs scaling to continue
Applied Materials External Use
600
Front End Products Group
20
Strained Silicon
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
21
Applied Materials Suite of Stress Inducing Films
Spacer
Offsets/Oxide/
Nitride
PMD
3
3
Stress Inducing Nitride
4
4
Ni Silicide
Ni Silicide
Si1-x
Gexx
1-x
Strained
Si Channel
MDD
MDD // Halo
Halo &
&
Retrograde
Well
Retrograde Well
Heavily
Heavily Doped
Doped Substrate
Substrate
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PMD
1&2
Source
Source
5
5
Stress Inducing Nitride
Gate
Unlanded
Contact
Shallow
Trench Isolation
Pre-Metal Dielectric (PMD)
Tensile Silicon Nitride (NMOS)
Compressive Silicon Nitride (PMOS)
Tensile - HARP PMD
Tensile - HARP STI
Selective Epitaxial Silicon Germanium
APPLIED MATERIALS
CONFIDENTIAL/INTERNAL
USE ONLY
Applied Materials
External Use
Ni Silicide
Drain
Drain
Si1-x
Gexx
1-x
Front End Products Group
22
High Stress Nitride for NMOS/PMOS Ion-Ioff (IBM, 2003)
Low
tensile
stress
NMOS
High
tensile
stress
Low
tensile
stress
PMOS
90nm
90nm MOSFET,
MOSFET, Tensile
Tensile stress
stress
1.4GPa
1.4GPa in
in etch
etch stop
stop
(Conventional
(Conventional <0.7Gpa)
<0.7Gpa)
High
Stress
SiN
High
tensile
stress
Better
Better NMOS
NMOS performance
performance (8%)
(8%) and
and
no
no PMOS
PMOS degradation.
degradation.
Optimized
Optimized strain
strain engineering
engineering
enabling
enabling high
high performance
performance NMOS
NMOS
with
with no
no impact
impact on
on PMOS
PMOS
performance
performance with
with minimum
minimum
manufacturing
manufacturing complexity.
complexity.
Ref.: V. Chan et al, “High speed 45nm Gate Length CMOSFETs Integrated Into a 90nm Bulk Technology Incorporating Strain Engineering,” IBM
Microelectronics (SRDC), IEDM 2003, Washington DC.
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
23
Strain Engineering for High Performance Logic
NMOS
PMOS
TEM of PMOS device where SiGe in the
source/drain areas are used to induce
compressive stress in the Si channel (25%
improvement in Idsat)
Ref.: T. Ghani et al, “A 90 nm High Volume Manufacturing Logic Technology Featuring Novel
TEM of 45 nm gate length device using SiN in
tensile stress to improve NMOS drive current (10%
improvement in Idsat))
45nm Gate Length Strained Silicon CMOS Transistors,” Intel Corp., IEDM 2003, Washington, D. C.
Intel uses both SiN overlayer and SiGe recessed S/D for strained Si
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
24
Modeling Localized Strain
1.8 GPa compressive
stress in SiGe S/D
Compressive stress
in channel
1.2 GPa tensile
stress in cap layer
Tensile stress in channel
800 MPa tensile
stress in silicide
Compressive stress
in channel
Simulations courtesy of Synopsys
JDP with Synopsys provides understanding for process optimization
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
25
10
-5
10
10
10
10
e
r
-6
S/D Elevation = e/r
-7
A 0 elev
B 40nm elev
C 60nm elev
Ref
-8
-9
150
250
350
450
550
On-state current [µA/µm]
Applied/IMEC/Synopsys Collaboration
Channel Stress Change (%)
Off-state current [A/µm]
Elevation improves device performance
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
25
50
75
100
S/D Elevation (%)
S/D elevation improves drive current but the effect saturates at ~40nm
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
26
Recent Recessed SiGe IMEC Transistor Data
Off-state Current [A/µm]
1.E-03
1.E-04
30% Ion Improvement
~60% Ion improvement at 40nA
SiGe
SiGe
1.E-05
1.E-06
60% Ion Improvement
1.E-07
Ref
Depth V2
1.E-08
SiGe
SiGe
1.E-09
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
On-state Current [uA/µm]
Applied/IMEC/Synopsys Collaboration
60% drive current improvement demonstrated with 120nm recessed etch.
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
27
AMAT/IMEC/Synopsys Strained Si IEDM 2004 Paper
Leading Development on Recessed S/D Strained SiGe
Applied Materials External Use
Front End Products Group
28
nMOS and pMOS stress contours
pMOS Geometry
nMOS Geometry
Includes stress from
tesile STI and tensile ESL
Includes stress form tensile STI,
SiGe and compressive ESL
Courtesy of Synopsys
Applied Materials External Use
Download