14. – Faraday Generator Construct a homopolar electric generator. Investigate the electrical properties of the device and find its efficiency. Problem – Rotating magnets – Stationary magnets • Interpretation • Basic explanation p • Theory • Measurements description • Results • Conclusion – Rotating magnets – Stationary magnets • Construction C i Contents Faraday’s y experiment p Disk Rotating Rotating St ti Stationary Magnets g Stationary Rotating R t ti Rotating N No Yes Yes Voltage g induced • In later experiments with cyllindrical magnets the following results were achieved: Interpretation p Lorentz force acting on electrons rotating inside the disk Velocity of the disk relative to the magnets = 0 → Explanation somewhat questionable → Understanding the nature of U d t di th t f magnetism and Lorentz force o 2. Magnets rotating with the disk o 1. Stationary magnets y g Basic explanation p ( ) Ei – intensity i t it off electric l t i fifield ld ω – angular velocity r – inner radius R – outer radius r r r FL r r r r FL = q v × B ⇒ Ei = = v × B q R r 2 2 r r R −r B – magnetic induction Ui = ∫ Ei ⋅ d r = B ω v – velocity 2 r • Lorentz force St ti Stationary magnets t Theory • Magnetic field is a consequence of moving charged particles →Electric and magnetic fields in different frames of refference connected by transformations • Magnets modeled by an inductor producing a h homogenous magnetic field of magnetic i fi ld f i induction B Moving magnets Theory Coulomb force acting on the left • In the frame reference of the electron we obtain a v ωr • Currents of charged particles • Velocity of negative particles in the reference frame of the moving electron larger on the right side then on the left side → larger length contraction v → larger density of positive particles • Analogous observation → larger d it f iti ti l th density of positive particles on the left side Moving magnets Theory x’ x B r P y yy’ ω’r’ ω r γ= (ω' r' )2 1− 2 c 1 β= c ω' r' ω' – angular velocity of rotating l l f system rr’=r – r distance of P from the center ω’r’ – linear velocity of point P B – magnetic field of the rotating g g inductor S – frame of refference of point P S’ – laboratory frame of refference Moving magnets Theory (ω ' r ' ) 2 1− c2 R2 − r2 = ∫ E y dr = B ω 2 r [1] Edward M. Purcell: Elecromagnetism, McGraw-Hill Ey = Uy ′ ′ ω 'r' Ez = 0 ′ Bz = B Ey = 0 R ′ Ez = 0 ′ Ez = γ (Ez − βcBy ) Bx = 0 By = 0 B ′ Ex = 0 ′ E y = γβ cB ′ E x = Ex ′ Ey = γ (Ey + βcBz ) E x= 0 S’ S Transformations [1] Fields acting in point P Moving magnets Theory • In both variations the same disk and axle are used • Diameter of disk ‐ 40 mm, axle ‐ 5 mm – Large range of velocities – Simple assembly Si l bl • 2 variants – 2 variants stationary magnets and magnets rotating with the disk • The generator is powered by a machine lathe Construction • The disk and the axle are turned from one piece of aluminium • The brushes are made from curved aluminium to the same curvature as the axle and the disk Construction • Magnets are attached to the disk using an double sided sealing tape and are also connected by their own magnetic force Construction rotatingg magnets g • Magnets attached with double sided sealing tape to polycarbonate housing which separates the disk and magnets The housing is not in the disk and magnets. The housing is not in contact with the disk Stationary magnets Construction • Open load voltage and the short circut current are measured using a digital multimeter Measurements – 0.0032N for each variant (same system of brushes) • Moment of torque – dinamometer – 0.22 T for the distance of the rotationg magnets T f th di t f th t ti t – 0.15 T for the distance of the stationary magnets • Rotation frequency – Rotation frequency stroboscope • Magnetic induction – hall probe Measurements Results 0 2 4 6 8 0 50 150 Angular velocity [m/s] 100 200 Measured voltage Calculated voltage Comparisson of theroetical and experimental induced voltage for rotating magnets Voltage [mV] Voltage [m mV] 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 20 40 80 100 Angular velocity [rad/s] 60 120 140 160 Measured voltage Calculated voltage Comparisson of theroetical and experimental induced voltage for stationary magnets Results Current [mA] 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0 20 40 60 100 120 Angular velocity [rad/s] 80 140 Rotating magnets 160 • Short circut voltage Sh t i t lt 180 200 0 00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0 20 Results Current [mA] 40 80 100 Angular velocity [rad/s] 60 120 Stationary magnets 140 160 • Input mechanical power – Calculated from angular momentum of friction and angular velocity – P = ωM • Output power O t t – Calculated from voltage on load and short circut i t current t – Maximal output power: P = UI/2 • Efficiency – ratio of output and input power η = Efficiencyy Pt Pu Efficien ncy 5.0e-8 1.0e-7 15 7 1.5e-7 2.0e-7 2.5e-7 3.0e-7 3.5e-7 4.0e-7 4.5e-7 20 40 60 100 120 140 Angular velocity [rad/s] 80 Rotating magnets Efficiencyy 160 180 200 Efficiency 2.0e-8 4.0e-8 6 0e 8 6.0e-8 8.0e-8 1.0e-7 1.2e-7 1.4e-7 1.6e-7 20 40 60 100 Angular velocity [rad/s] 80 Stationary magnets Efficiencyy 120 140 160 • Two variations of the homopolar generator were constructed • In‐depth explanation comparring two d h l interpretations (magnetism and special relativity) l • The difference between the induced voltages between the stationary and rotating construction arises only because of different distances between the magnets Summaryy and conclusion • Measured and calculated open load voltage are in very good agreement • The resistance in the stationary system very small, but when the disk is rotating the y resistance increases dramatically because of the irregularities on the surface → very small efficiency • The construction leaves a lot of space for improvement which would increase the effeciency by large amounts. ff i b l Summaryy and conclusion 1. Edward M. Purcell: Electromagnetism, McGraw‐Hill g 2. The homopolar motor: A true relativistic engine Jorge Guala‐Valverde, Pedro Mazzoni, and Ricardo Achilles Am. J. Phys. 70, 1052 (2002) 3. Serway, Jewett, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 7th edition, Thomson 2007. 4. Layton, Simon, A different twist on the Lorentz force and L t Si A diff t t i t th L t f d Faraday's law, Phys. Teach. 36, 474 (1998) 5. http://www.physics.umd.edu/lecdem/outreach/QOTW/arch 11/q218unipolar.pdf 6. http://www.stardrivedevice.com/over‐unity.html 7 ttp://www.rexresearch.com/trombly/trombly.htm 7. ttp://www rexresearch com/trombly/trombly htm References Thank you for your attention! Bx = 0 Bz = B By = 0 ′ Bx = Bx β ′ By = γ (By − Ez ) c β ′ Bz = γ (Bz + Ey ) c ′ Ez = γ (Ez − βcBy ) ′ E x = Ex ′ Ey = γ (Ey + βcBz ) Transformations [1] Ez = 0 Ey = 0 E x= 0 S Fields acting in point P S’ ′ B z = γB z ′ Ez = 0 ′ Bx = 0 ′ By = 0 ′ Ex = 0 ′ E y = γβ cB z Moving magnets Theory